Chirurgie robotique en gynécologie : état des connaissances. Revue de la littérature

Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction - Insights From the One of the Largest Centers in Asia

BACKGROUND

The use of robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) with immediate direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction in treatment of breast cancer has been a controversial topic. The adoption of robotic surgery in breast cancer treatment has gained traction globally due to its minimally invasive nature, potential for improved cosmetic outcomes and better intraoperative visualization. This study provides insights on safety and feasibility robotic mastectomy at one of the largest centers in Asia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) with immediate direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction from April 2018 to September 2024. Our endpoints were mainly focused on perioperative outcomes, patient satisfaction, and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 266 procedures were included in our series, with 233 patients undergoing unilateral R-NSM with either DTI reconstruction or a tissue expander, and 33 patients underwent surgery on both breasts. Postoperative complications were recorded in 11 patients (4.14 %). The median follow-up of this study is 37.2 ± 23.3 months. Locoregional recurrence (LRR) was observed in 6 patients (2.5 %), with isolated skin recurrence being the most common. Distant metastasis was observed in 9 patients (3.86 %). The 3-year overall survival rate was 98.3 %.

CONCLUSION

Robotic NSM is a safe and feasible novel minimal invasive surgical approach for breast cancer surgery, providing both excellent cosmetic results and oncological outcomes that are noninferior to conventional or endoscopic approaches.

Prospective Pilot Study of Robotic-Assisted Harvest of the Latissimus Dorsi Muscle: A 510(k) Approval Study with U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption

BACKGROUND

There are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications for robotic plastic surgery. This study was designed to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the robotic latissimus dorsi harvest for FDA approval.

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm study was conducted under an investigational device exemption through the FDA for obtaining 510(k) approval. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events attributable to harvest. Primary efficacy endpoints included muscle viability after harvest and conversion to open technique. Secondary endpoints included postoperative pain and upper extremity function.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients enrolled, with a mean age of 50 ± 10 years and a mean body mass index of 25 ± 4 kg/m2. There were no adverse events, all muscles were viable after harvest, and there were zero conversions to open procedures. Visual analogue scale scores for pain progressively decreased postoperatively and returned to baseline, indicating resolution of postoperative pain. Physical therapy assessment demonstrated recovery of function in all range-of-movement domains by 36 weeks. There was no difference in function of the operated extremity between baseline and 36 weeks' follow-up for Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire (p = 0.87); QuickDASH Work Module (p > 0.05); and QuickDASH Sports Module (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System is safe based on zero adverse events attributable to harvest and efficacious based on 100 percent muscle viability after harvest and zero conversions to open technique. There appears to be little to no long-term functional deficit or pain from muscle harvest. Given these results and their own prestudy guidelines, the robotic latissimus dorsi qualifies for 510(k) submission by Intuitive Surgical and approval by the U.S. FDA.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Training for next generation surgeons: a pilot study of robot-assisted hysterectomy managed by resident using dual console

PURPOSE

To assess feasibility of a standardized robot-assisted hysterectomy managed by resident and supervised by senior surgeon using dual-console on a 21-step grid (max score = 42) assessing resident autonomy.

METHODS

A total of seven patients managed between September 2019 and March 2020 by six residents in gynecology and obstetrics were included. Standardized robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer or adenomyosis was performed.

RESULTS

No conversion to laparotomy, no intra- or post-operative incidents were reported. Mean score on the evaluation scale was 29.8 out of 42 (SD = 7.3). Mean operative time was 104 min (SD = 23). Mean average suturing time was, respectively, 335 s (SD = 57 s) and 270 s (SD = 53 s) for the first and the fourth knot. There was a 65 s improvement between the first and the fourth intracorporeal knot (p = 0.043). The perceived workload evaluated with the NASA TLX score showed a low level of stress (Temporal demand = 1.6 /10), and a low level of frustration (Frustration level = 3.6/10). Experience gained during the surgery was felt to be important (Commitment = 8.6/10).

CONCLUSION

Standardized robot-assisted hysterectomy managed by a resident supervised by a senior surgeon using the dual-console seems feasible. This tool could be useful to assess residents' surgical skills.

Functional Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Free Flap Oropharyngeal Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgical systems provide a clear, magnified 3-dimensional visualization as well as precise, stable instrumental movement, thereby minimizing technical difficulties that may be encountered in the surgical treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. This study assessed the outcomes of robotic-assisted free flap oropharyngeal reconstruction compared with those of conventional free flap reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 47 patients who underwent reconstructive operations using a free radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap for oropharyngeal defects was conducted over a 20-month period (May 2013-December 2014). Complications were evaluated for a robot-assisted reconstruction group and a conventional reconstruction group; postoperative complication rates and revision rates were further evaluated. The Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale (FIGS) was adopted for functional outcome assessment.

RESULTS

This study recruited 47 people who underwent reconstructive operations using a free radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap for oropharyngeal defects (14 robot-assisted and 33 conventional reconstructions). The mean postoperative FIGS score was 10.29 ± 2.02 in the robot-assisted group (P = 0.010) and 8.42 ± 2.29 in the conventional group at 1 month postoperatively. The mean postoperative FIGS score was 12.57 ± 1.91 in the robot-assisted group (P = 0.005) and 9.91 ± 3.09 in the conventional group at 3 months postoperatively. Complication rates between the robot-assisted and conventional groups were similar for flap failure (P = 0.531), partial necrosis, wound infection, hematoma or seroma formation (P = 0.893), wound dehiscence, and fistula formation (P = 0.515). The number of flap revision operations requiring additional surgery (P = 0.627) was comparable between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in complications or revision rates between the robot-assisted and conventional oropharyngeal reconstructions. The functional postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted reconstructions are superior to those of conventional reconstructions. Robotic surgical systems provide a safe option with optimal postoperative oral function for the free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects without lip or mandible splitting.

Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study

BACKGROUND

We previously devised and reported on an innovative surgical technique of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction. Here we describe the outcome of the first 29 such consecutive procedures performed on breast cancer patients to assess feasibility, reproducibility and safety.

METHODS

The following morbidity factors were tested: operation time, conversion rate to open technique, length of hospitalization, registration of complications for 1 year postoperatively and their characterization as either minor, major, or multiple, depending on clinical severity and treatment required.

RESULTS

The total duration of the final robotic surgeries of our series was around 3 h, showing a very rapid learning curve. The conversion rate due to technical problems was 2 of the 29 procedures (6,9%). No major complications, including hematoma, seroma, skin or nipple-areola injury or necrosis or infection were observed for any case. Two patients had a small degree of blistering from internal electrocautery in the breast skin flap, both of which resolved in one week without any specific therapy. No systemic complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

The low conversion rate to open surgery, the rapid learning curve and the low rate of post-operative complications observed in this preliminary series lead us to endorse a prospective study aimed at evaluating patient satisfaction.

Robot-assisted free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal cancer--a preliminary report

BACKGROUND

The robotic surgical system provides a clear, magnified, 3-dimensional (3D) view as well as a precise and stable instrumental movement, which minimizes many technical difficulties that may be encountered in the surgical treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. A preliminary result of transoral robot-assisted free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal cancer is presented herein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May and December 2013, the Da Vinci Surgical System (Da Vinci Si, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) was used in 5 (4 men and 1 woman) cases of oropharyngeal reconstruction. Robot-assisted reconstruction was performed for inset of the flap and for performing a venous anastomosis of the free radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap.

RESULTS

All of the reconstructive surgeries were successful without flap failure or take-backs. There were no wound infections or fistulas.

CONCLUSION

The application of a robotic surgical system seems to be a safe option in the free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects without lip or mandible splitting.

Robotic, intraperitoneal harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle

BACKGROUND

The rectus abdominis muscle is a workhorse for free and pedicled muscle coverage. Traditional harvest violates the anterior rectus sheath and requires an abdominal incision. Robotic harvest can be reliably and efficiently performed using three ports and no additional incisions.

METHODS

Ten robotic rectus muscle harvests were performed at three institutions as free flaps for extremity coverage and pedicled flaps for minimally invasive pelvic surgery requiring soft-tissue reconstruction. Three contralateral ports and an intraperitoneal approach were used in each harvest. Demographic information, operative variables, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

All cases were completed robotically by three surgeons at three different institutions. Four muscles were harvested as free flaps for lower extremity and six muscles were used as pedicled flaps, three for abdominopelvic defect reconstruction and two for protection of visceral repair following salvage prostatectomy or anterior pelvic exenteration. Average robotic setup time was 15 minutes. Average robotic harvest time was 45 minutes. Two 8-mm ports and one 12-mm port were used in each case. One patient developed a grade I decubitus ulcer during an extended operation. There were no other complications. All muscles were completely viable following harvest. There were no conversions to open technique, and no hernias or bulges were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic rectus muscle harvest is safe, efficient, and reproducible. The anterior rectus sheath can be left completely intact, eliminating incisional morbidity. The cumulative incisional length can be less than 2 inches even for extensive, multiservice pelvic procedures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle: principles and clinical applications

Harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle requires an abdominal incision as well as violation of the anterior rectus sheath, creating the potential for significant surgical-site morbidity (bulges, hernias, infections, seromas). Laparoscopic or endoscopic techniques, although feasible, have not become popular among plastic surgeons due to multiple technical shortcomings. Robotic surgery on the other hand has an easier learning curve, enhanced precision, tremor elimination, motion scaling, high resolution, three-dimensional optics and an intuitive interface. As a result of these advantages, robotic surgery has permeated into the plastic surgery specialty, assuming a role in the harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle flap and other reconstructive procedures. In this review, the authors discuss its applicability in the harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle.

The place of robotics in gynecologic surgery

Robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery has undergone widespread development in recent years. The surgical literature on this subject continues to grow. The goal of this article is to summarize the principal indications for robotic assistance in gynecologic surgery and to offer a general overview of the principal articles dealing with robotic surgery for both benign and malignant disease.

Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series

BACKGROUND

The latissimus dorsi muscle is a workhorse of reconstructive surgery. Traditional harvest technique requires a long, posterior donor-site incision. Endoscopic harvest is limited by technical challenges. Robotic technology permits a simpler, minimally invasive harvest technique.

METHODS

Seven consecutive robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvests were performed by a single surgeon. Two were used as free flaps for scalp reconstruction and the remaining five as pedicled flaps for breast reconstruction; three were for immediate, implant-based reconstruction with nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomies, and two were for radiated breasts when the expander was exchanged for an implant. Harvest technique employed a short, axillary incision for pedicle dissection and two to three additional ports for robotic instrumentation.

RESULTS

All seven muscle flaps were harvested without converting to an open technique. Both free flaps were successfully transferred. All pedicled flaps resulted in successful breast reconstructions. Flap harvest complications included a single, temporary radial nerve palsy in the contralateral extremity, likely from positioning. There were no donor-site hematomas, seromas, or cutaneous thermal injuries. Robotic harvest time decreased from over 2 hours to about an hour over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic harvest of the latissimus dorsi is a novel and effective method of muscle harvest. It offers technical advantages over endoscopic harvest and aesthetic advantages over the open technique.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.