Reproductive health care in Catholic-owned hospitals

Catholic Hospital Affiliation and Postpartum Contraceptive Care and Subsequent Deliveries

Importance

In recent years, the number of Catholic hospitals has grown, raising concerns about access to contraception. The association between living in an area in which the closest hospital is Catholic and the probability of postpartum contraception and subsequent deliveries is unknown.

Objective

To assess whether living in an area in which the closest hospital was Catholic was associated with the probability of postpartum contraception and subsequent deliveries.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases, State Emergency Department Databases, and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases for 11 states (California, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, and Wisconsin). Female patients with a delivery from 2016 to 2019 who lived within 20 miles of a nonfederal acute care hospital were included, with patients followed up for 1 to 3 years. Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients based on the county-level percentage of the population affiliated with Catholic churches and urbanicity, and the zip code-level number of hospitals within 5 and 20 miles, median household income, and percentage of the population by race and ethnicity. Data were analyzed from April 2022 to November 2023.

Exposures

Residence in a zip code in which the closest hospital was Catholic.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Probabilities of delivery at a Catholic hospital, surgical sterilization within 1 year of delivery, receipt of long-acting reversible contraception at delivery, and subsequent delivery within 3 years.

Results

The sample consisted of 4 101 443 deliveries (1 301 792 after matching), with 14.5% of patients living in exposed zip codes (ie, where the closest hospital was Catholic). Living in exposed zip codes was associated with a 21.26-percentage point (pp) increase in the probability of delivery at a Catholic hospital (95% CI, 19.50 to 23.02 pp; 237.3% relative to the mean in unexposed zip codes; P < .001). Additionally, comparing exposed vs unexposed zip codes, the probability of surgical sterilization at delivery decreased by 0.95 pp (95% CI, -1.14 to -0.76 pp; P < .001) and the probability of sterilization in the year after discharge further decreased by 0.21 pp (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.13; P < .001). Subsequent deliveries within 3 years increased 0.47 pp (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.97 pp; 2.3% relative to the mean in unexposed zip codes; P = .07).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study finds that living in a zip code in which the closest hospital was Catholic was associated with a modest decrease in the probability of postpartum surgical sterilizations and a modest increase in the probability of subsequent deliveries.

Association of Medicaid Reimbursement Policies with Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in the Postpartum Period, 2012-2018

Background: To address reimbursement challenges associated with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in the postpartum period, state Medicaid programs have provided additional payments ("carve-outs"). Implementation has been heterogeneous, with states providing separate payments for the device only, procedure only, or both the device and procedure. Methods: Claims data were drawn from 210,994 deliveries in the United States between 2012 and 2018. Using generalized estimating equations, we assess the relationship between Medicaid carve-out policies and the likelihood of LARC placement at (1) 3 days postpartum, (2) 60 days postpartum, and (3) 1 year postpartum, in Medicaid and commercially insured populations. Results: Among Medicaid beneficiaries, the likelihood of receiving LARC was higher in states with any carve-out, compared with states without carve-outs, at 3 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49 [95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.67], p < 0.001), 60 days (aOR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.35-1.46], p < 0.001), and 1 year postpartum (aOR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.11-1.20], p < 0.001). Adjustments were made for geographic region, seasonality, and patient age. Heterogeneity was observed by carve-out type; device carve-outs were consistently associated with greater likelihood of postpartum LARC placement, compared with states with no carve-outs. Similar trends were observed among commercially insured patients. Conclusion: Findings support the effectiveness of Medicaid carve-outs on postpartum LARC provision, particularly for device carve-outs, which were associated with increased postpartum LARC placement at 3 days, 60 days, and 1 year postpartum. This outcome suggests that policies to address cost-related barriers associated with LARC devices may prove most useful in overcoming barriers to immediate postpartum LARC placement, with the overarching aim of promoting reproductive autonomy.

U.S. physicians' perspectives on the complexities and challenges of permanent contraception provision

OBJECTIVES

Evidence shows many misconceptions exist around permanent contraception, and there are numerous barriers to accessing the procedure. This qualitative study explored physician perspectives regarding patients' informational and decision-support needs, the complexities and challenges of counseling and access, and how these factors may differ for people living on lower incomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted 15 semistructured, telephone interviews with obstetrician-gynecologists in three geographic regions of the United States to explore their perspectives on providing permanent contraception counseling and care. We analyzed the interviews using content analysis.

RESULTS

Physicians discussed a tension between respecting individual reproductive autonomy and concern for future regret; they wanted to support patients' desire for permanent contraception but were frequently concerned patients did not have the information they needed or the foresight to make high-quality decisions. Physicians also identified barriers to counseling including lack of time, lack of continuity over the course of prenatal care, and baseline misinformation among patients. Physicians identified additional barriers in providing a postpartum procedure even after thedecision was made including lack of personnel and operating room availability. Finally, physicians felt that people living on lower incomes faced more challenges in access primarily due to the sterilization consent regulations required by Medicaid.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians report numerous challenges surrounding permanent contraception provision and access. Strategies are needed to support physicians and patients to enhance high-quality, patient-centered sterilization decision making and ensure that patients are able to access a permanent contraceptive procedure when desired.

IMPLICATIONS

This qualitative study demonstrates the various challenges faced by physicians to support permanent contraception decision making. These challenges may limit patients' access to the care they desire. This study supports the need to transform care delivery models and improve the federal sterilization policy to ensure equitable patient-centered access to desired permanent contraception.

DISCLAIMER

Although the term permanent contraception has increasingly replaced the word sterilization in clinical settings, we use sterilization in some places throughout this paper as that was the standard terminology at the time the interviews were conducted and the language the interviewed physicians used.

Prevalence and County-Level Distribution of Births in Catholic Hospitals in the US in 2020

This study uses American Hospital Association data to examine the volume and distribution of births in Catholic US hospitals and quantify county-level patterns of Catholic and non-Catholic hospital births.

Catholic sole community hospitals are associated with decreased receipt of postpartum permanent contraception among Medicaid recipients

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association of Catholic hospitals with receipt of postpartum tubal ligation and long acting, reversible contraception among Medicaid recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of live births from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016 to female Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States between ages 21 and 44. Our main exposure was the presence of a Catholic-affiliated sole community hospital, and our primary outcome was highly effective postpartum contraception. We examined rates of postpartum permanent contraception, along with the use of a long acting, reversible form of contraception (LARC) at 3 and 60 days are postpartum. We compared counties that had only a Catholic-affiliated hospital with counties with only a non-Catholic hospital.

RESULTS

Our study population included 14,545 postpartum Medicaid beneficiaries. Study participants came from 88 counties across 10 United States states. Only 7.7% of women in counties with Catholic sole community hospitals received permanent contraception by 3 days postpartum, compared to 11.3% in counties with non-Catholic sole community hospitals (RD: -3.92%; 95% CI: -6.01%, -1.83%). This difference was not mitigated by receipt of outpatient procedures or long-acting, reversible contraception. Importantly, women residing in counties with Catholic sole community hospitals were much less likely to return postpartum for an outpatient visit between 8 and 60 days postpartum than women in counties with non-Catholic sole community hospitals (35.4% vs 45.4%, RD: -9.29%; 95% CI: -16.71%, -1.86%).

CONCLUSIONS

In counties where the only hospital was Catholic, Medicaid recipients giving birth were significantly less likely to receive permanent contraception and to return for postpartum care.

IMPLICATIONS

Catholic hospitals are increasing in the United States, which may restrict access to postpartum contraception, particularly in rural areas. We found that Medicaid recipients giving birth at a Catholic sole community hospital were less likely to receive permanent contraception and to return for care.

Short-Interval Pregnancy in the Illinois Medicaid Population Following Delivery in Catholic vs non-Catholic Hospitals

OBJECTIVE

Catholic hospitals restrict access to comprehensive reproductive health services that could impact patient outcomes. We sought to determine whether delivery at a Catholic hospital is associated with shorter pregnancy intervals among patients insured by Medicaid in Illinois.

STUDY DESIGN

We used Illinois Medicaid data files to conduct a retrospective cohort study. We used billing codes to identify deliveries in 2010 and 2011 and classified each by hospital of delivery, maternal age, race/ethnicity, and residential zip code. We calculated the interval from index birth to subsequent conception using an established method, and used Cox proportional hazards regression to compare the rate of subsequent pregnancy between enrollees who delivered in Catholic vs non-Catholic hospitals, adjusting for individual characteristics. We also computed differences in the rates of conception within 6, 12 and 18 month intervals.

RESULTS

We identified 96,293 index births and 18,627 subsequent conceptions. Twenty eight percent (26,775) of index births occurred in a Catholic hospital. Women who delivered in a Catholic hospital had a 12% greater risk of conception in the following 18 months (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity and rural residence. At 18 months, 23.9% of enrollees delivering in a Catholic hospital had become pregnant as compared to 21.2% for enrollees delivering in a non-Catholic hospital (difference of 2.6%, 95% CI 1.8-3.6).

CONCLUSION

Illinois Medicaid enrollees who deliver at Catholic hospitals have an increased risk of short-interval pregnancy. As the market share of Catholic hospitals grows, providers must work with patients to acknowledge and address these potential impacts on reproductive health outcomes and policies must change to promote equitable access.

IMPLICATIONS

Delivery at a Catholic hospital is associated with increased risk of short-interval pregnancy. Further attention from providers, researchers and policy makers alike, is necessary to identify the mechanisms through which these differences manifest such that effective interventions can be developed.

Faith-based provision of sexual and reproductive healthcare in Malawi

Faith-based organisations constitute the second largest healthcare providers in Sub-Saharan Africa but their religious values might be in conflict with providing some sexual and reproductive health services. We undertake regression analysis on data detailing client-provider interactions from a facility census in Malawi and examine whether religious ownership of facilities is associated with the degree of adherence to family planning guidelines. We find that faith-based organisations offer fewer services related to the investigation and prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and the promotion of condom use. The estimates are robust to several sensitivity checks on the impact of client selection. Given the prevalence of faith-based facilities in Sub-Saharan Africa, our results suggest that populations across the region may be at risk from inadequate sexual and reproductive healthcare provision which could exacerbate the incidence of STIs, such as HIV/AIDS, and unplanned pregnancies.

Increasing Access to Abortion: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 815

Individuals require access to safe, legal abortion. Abortion, although legal, is increasingly out of reach because of numerous restrictions imposed by the government that target patients seeking abortion and their health care practitioners. Insurance coverage restrictions, which take many forms, constitute a substantial barrier to abortion access and increase reproductive health inequities. Adolescents, people of color, those living in rural areas, those with low incomes, and incarcerated people can face disproportionate effects of restrictions on abortion access. Stigma and fear of violence may be less tangible than legislative and financial restrictions, but are powerful barriers to abortion provision nonetheless. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, along with other medical organizations, opposes such interference with the patient-clinician relationship, affirming the importance of this relationship in the provision of high-quality medical care. This revision includes updates based on new restrictions and litigation related to abortion.

Disestablishing Hospitals

We argue that concentration of power in religious hospitals threatens disestablishment values. When hospitals deny care for religious reasons, they dominate patients' bodies and convictions. Health law should - and to some extent already does - constrain such religious domination.

Market Share of US Catholic Hospitals and Associated Geographic Network Access to Reproductive Health Services

IMPORTANCE

Access to reproductive health services is a public health goal. It is unknown how geographic and health plan network availability of Catholic and non-Catholic hospitals may be associated with access to reproductive health services in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the market share of Catholic hospitals in the United States, both overall and within Marketplace health insurance plans' hospital networks.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study of US counties used data on hospitals' Catholic affiliation and discharges, hospital networks in Marketplace health insurance plans, and US Census population data to construct a national, county-level data set. The Catholic hospital market share overall in each county and in Marketplace plans' hospital networks in each county were calculated. The study examined whether the Catholic hospital market share was different within Marketplace networks compared with the counties they served. Data analysis was conducted in May and June 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The overall Catholic hospital market share was calculated on the basis of the share of discharges in Catholic hospitals in a county compared with all hospital discharges. Overall market share was categorized as minimal (≤2%), low (>2% to ≤20%), high (>20% to ≤70%), or dominant (>70%). The Catholic hospital market share in Marketplace networks was calculated as the share of Catholic hospital discharges in each Marketplace network.

RESULTS

The sample included 4450 hospitals in 3101 counties. Overall, 26.1% of US counties had minimal Catholic hospital market share, 38.6% had low Catholic hospital market share, and 35.3% had high or dominant Catholic hospital market share; 38.7% of US reproductive-aged women resided in counties with high or dominant Catholic hospital market share. Among counties with Catholic hospital market share greater than 2%, the distribution of the median Marketplace network's Catholic hospital market share (median [interquartile range], 4.6% [0%-24.3%]) was lower than overall Catholic hospital market share (median [interquartile range], 18.5% [8.1%-36.5%]). The median Marketplace hospital network had a lower Catholic hospital market share than the county overall in 68.0% of US counties with Catholic hospital market share greater than 2%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this national study, 35.3% of counties had high or dominant Catholic hospital market share serving an estimated 38.7% of US women of reproductive age. Marketplace health insurance plans' hospital networks included a lower share of Catholic hospitals than the counties they serve.