Low virological response and high relapse rates in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis despite adequate therapeutic dosing

Liver stiffness measurements and FIB-4 are predictors of response to sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens in 7256 chronic HCV patients

Objectives: To assess the role of baseline liver stiffness (LS) by Transient elastography (TE) and FIB-4 in the prediction of virological response to sofosbuvir - based regimens in chronic HCV patients.Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study including 7256 chronic HCV patients who received different sofosbuvir-based regimens. Baseline demographic and laboratory data were recorded. TE was performed with FIB-4 calculation at baseline.Results: Sustained virological response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12) was 91.4%. Pretreatment TE values and FIB-4 were significantly lower among sustained responders (17.8 ± 11.5 kPa, 2.66 ± 1.98, respectively) versus relapsers (24.5 ± 13.9 kPa, 4.02 ± 3.3, respectively). Best cutoff levels for LS by TE and FIB-4 score for prediction of failure to treatment response were 16.7 kPa and 2.4, respectively. Among different treatment protocol, patients with FIB-4 > 2.4, TE values >16.7 kPa are more prone to treatment failure except when using SOF/SIM treatment regimens.Conclusion: Baseline LS by TE and FIB-4 score may be useful for predicting treatment outcome in the new era of DAAs and could be integrated into pretreatment assessment of chronic HCV patients for better optimization of patient management.

Efficacy of direct-acting antiviral treatment in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: A multicenter study

AIM

Although the development of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has markedly advanced, the effects of cirrhosis on DAA treatment remain unclear. We aimed to clarify the impact of cirrhosis on DAA treatment of patients infected with HCV.

METHODS

This large-scale, multicenter, retrospective study consisted of 2130 HCV genotype 1b-infected patients who were treated with one of the following DAA combination therapies: asunaprevir/daclatasvir (ASV/DCV), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), or paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir (PTV/OBV/r). Ninety-two patients (4.3%) previously received DAA-based treatment. Seven hundred and forty-five patients (34.9%) had cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Overall, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 93.0%. The SVR rates in patients who received ASV/DCV, LDV/SOF, or PTV/OBV/r were 90.0%, 96.9%, and 97.6%, respectively. The SVR rate in patients with cirrhosis (89.1%) was significantly lower than that in patients without cirrhosis (95.1%, P = 6.94 × 10^-7 ). In the multivariate analysis for the overall cohort, absence of cirrhosis (P = 1.26 × 10^-3 ), no previous DAA-based treatment (P = 2.54 × 10^-14 ), low HCV-RNA levels (P = 1.64 × 10^-6 ), wild-type non-structural protein 5A L31/Y93 (P = 7.33 × 10^-13 ), and DAA regimen (LDV/SOF or PTV/OBV/r) (P = 1.92 × 10^-14 ) were independent factors contributing to SVR. Except for patients with DAA-based treatment history, absence of cirrhosis (P = 2.15 × 10^-3 ; odds ratio, 2.51) was an independent factor contributing to SVR in 2038 DAA-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the presence of cirrhosis reduces the SVR rate of DAA treatment, regardless of the type of DAA treatment.

Regulation of interferon signaling and HCV‑RNA replication by extracellular matrix

Although interferon (IFN)‑based treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is widely applied, treatment resistance is often observed in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. Given that the molecular mechanisms of IFN resistance in liver fibrosis remain elusive, the present study investigated the effects of extracellular matrix (ECM) on IFN signaling in hepatic cells. The native HuH‑7 human hepatoma cell line and HuH‑7 cells were stably transfected with full‑length HCV‑RNA fused with Renilla luciferase (OR6 cells) were cultured on ECM‑coated dishes or non‑coated plastic dishes (NDs), and treated with human IFN‑α. In Huh‑7 cells cultured on coated dishes, the IFN‑stimulated response element (ISRE) luciferase activity was measured following ISRE plasmid transfection and the expression of IFN‑stimulated genes (ISG) were significantly lower than those in cells cultured on NDs. In addition, after IFN‑α treatment, the amount of HCV‑RNA and viral protein produced by OR6 cells cultured on coated dishes was higher than that produced by cells cultured on NDs. When cells were treated with β1‑integrin‑blocking antibody to disrupt the cell‑matrix interaction, the ISRE luciferase activity was restored, and the protein expression of ISG was increased, while that of HCV proteins was suppressed. Treatment of cells with integrin‑linked kinase (ILK) inhibitor or focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor restored the ISRE luciferase activity and expression of ISG proteins. These results suggested that β1‑integrin‑mediated signals affected the IFN signaling and promoted HCV replication. Therefore, the accumulation of ECM in liver fibrosis may impair IFN signaling through β1‑integrin‑mediated signaling involving ILK and FAK.

Demographic profile, host, disease & viral predictive factors of response in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection at a tertiary care hospital in north India

Background & objectives:

Standard of care for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in India is peginterferon and ribavirin (RBV). The response to treatment in real life stetting is unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the demographic profile and assess the virological response and predictors of response in CHC patients.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with CHC were included in this study. Detailed clinical history, risk factors, and predictive factors of response were noted. Patients were treated with peginterferon α2b (1.5 µg/kg/wk) and RBV (12 mg/kg/day) for 6 to 18 months based on response.

Results:

A total of 211 patients were included in the analysis, mean age 40.6±12.3 yr, 144 (68%) were males and 71 (34%) had compensated cirrhosis. Commonest risk factor for acquiring CHC was previous transfusion and surgery (51%). Genotype 3 (72%) was most common followed by genotype 1 (23%). Overall sustained virologic response (SVR) was 64 per cent [95% CI 57.1%-70.4%]. The SVR was 66.5 per cent [95% CI 58.34-73.89%] for genotype 3 and 61.2 per cent [95% CI 46.23 to 74.80%] for genotype 1. Non-cirrhotics had better SVR rates compared to cirrhotics (76 vs 41%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥23 kg/m², HOMA-IR ≥2, compliance (≤80%), and fibrosis >2 were predictors of low SVR.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Genotype 3 was the commonest HCV genotype. The commonest source of infection was previous transfusion and surgery. SVR rates for genotypes 3 were better than genotype 1 patients. Predictors of non-response were high BMI, insulin resistance, significant fibrosis and inadequate compliance.

Role of assessing liver fibrosis in management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Fibrosis progression is common in hepatitis C. Both host and viral factors influence its natural history. Liver fibrosis is a key predictive factor for advanced disease including endpoints such as liver failure, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METAVIR fibrosis stages F3-F4 have been considered as the threshold for antiviral therapy. However, this aspect is controversial after the advent of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) because they show an excellent efficacy and safety profile. Moreover, in the DAA era, fibrosis stage seems not to be a predictive factor of a sustained virological response (SVR). Viral eradication decreases liver damage by improving the inflammation, as well as by regressing fibrosis irrespective of the treatment regimen. Non-invasive methods are useful in the assessment of liver fibrosis, replacing liver biopsy in clinical practice; but their usefulness for monitoring fibrosis after SVR needs to be demonstrated. Fibrosis regression has been demonstrated after the eradication of hepatitis C virus infection and is associated with a lower risk of hepatic cirrhosis and liver cancer. However, patients showing advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis must be followed-up after SVR, as risks of portal hypertension and HCC remain.

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: Between prediction/prevention of outcomes and cost-effectiveness

The assessment of the fibrotic evolution of chronic hepatitis has always been a challenge for the clinical hepatologist. Over the past decade, various non-invasive methods have been proposed to detect the presence of fibrosis, including the elastometric measure of stiffness, panels of clinical and biochemical parameters, and combinations of both methods. The aim of this review is to analyse the most recent data on non-invasive techniques for the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis with particular attention to cost-effectiveness. We searched for relevant studies published in English using the PubMed database from 2009 to the present. A large number of studies have suggested that elastography and serum markers are useful techniques for diagnosing severe fibrosis and cirrhosis and for excluding significant fibrosis in hepatitis C virus patients. In addition, hepatic stiffness may also help to prognosticate treatment response to antiviral therapy. It has also been shown that magnetic resonance elastography has a high accuracy for staging and differentiating liver fibrosis. Finally, studies have shown that non-invasive methods are becoming increasingly precise in either positively identifying or excluding liver fibrosis, thus reducing the need for liver biopsy. However, both serum markers and transient elastography still have “grey area” values of lower accuracy. In this case, liver biopsy is still required to properly assess liver fibrosis. Recently, the guidelines produced by the World Health Organization have suggested that the AST-to-platelet ratio index or FIB-4 test could be utilised for the evaluation of liver fibrosis rather than other, more expensive non-invasive tests, such as elastography or FibroTest.

Interleukin-28B gene non-TT allele strongly predicts treatment failure for genotype 1 infected chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis: a case control study

BACKGROUND

The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of interleukin (IL)-28B in predicting therapeutic response of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (PR) for genotype 1 infected chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis (AF) is limited. The aim of this study is to assess its role in predicting sustained virologic responses (SVR) to treatment.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with biopsy proven hepatitis C virus (HCV) related AF (group A; Ishak fibrosis score, ≥4) and 126 sex- and HCV genotype-matched patients without AF (group B; Ishak fibrosis score, ≤3) were recruited into study. All patients received PR therapy for 24 weeks. Baseline and on-treatment clinical, virological and host factors were evaluated for treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

The SVR rate was significantly lower in group A than group B patients with genotype 1 infection (24% vs. 53.3%; p=0.011). However, it was similar in those with genotype non-1 infection (76.5% vs. 76.5%; p=1.0). IL-28B rs8099917 genotype TT is the strongest predictor for SVR in genotype 1 infection. Patients who had TT genotype and achieved RVR in group A had similar SVR rates with those in group B (44.4% vs. 53.3%; p=0.614). One third of patients in group A developed hematological adverse effects and had required modified doses during antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In HCV genotype 1 infected AF receiving 24 weeks of PR treatment, patients with IL28B rs8099917 genotype TT, achieving RVR had similar SVR rate with those without AF. In contrast, patients with IL-28B rs8099917 non-TT genotype without achieving RVR are suggested to stop therapy.

Evaluation of the prognostic value of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus treated with triple or dual antiviral therapy: A prospective pilot study

AIM: To evaluate the association between liver stiffness (LS) prior to the initiation of dual/triple therapy and viral response.

METHODS: LS was measured in all patients before treatment was administered. The therapeutic approach was based on hepatic, virological, and immunological evaluations and considered the fact that patients with severe fibrosis (F3) or compensated cirrhosis (F4) in Child-Pugh class A are the primary candidates for triple therapy. In total, 65 hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients were treated with Peg-interferon/ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV); 24 patients were classified as genotypes 1/4 (36.92%), and 41 patients were classified as genotypes 2/3 (63.08%) (dual therapy). In addition, 20 HCV treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients were treated with PegIFN-RBV and boceprevir (triple therapy). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare the groups.

RESULTS: LS significantly differed between dual therapy and triple therapy (P = 0.002). The mean LS value before dual therapy treatment was 8.61 ± 5.79 kPa and was significantly different between patients achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR) 24 weeks after therapy and those who did not (7.23 ± 5.18 kPa vs 11.72 ± 5.99 kPa, respectively, P = 0.0003). The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 4.45 (95%CI: 2.32-8.55). The attributable risk of non-response to therapy was 49%. The mean LS value before triple therapy treatment was 13.29 ± 8.57 kPa and was significantly different between patients achieving and not achieving SVR24 (9.41 ± 5.05 vs 19.11 ± 9.74, respectively; P = 0.008). The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 5.57% (95%CI: 1.50-20.65). The attributable risk of non-response to therapy (70%) was increased compared with dual therapy patients. Pre-treatment stiffness > 12 kPa was significantly associated with non-SVR (P < 0.025) in both groups.

CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment liver stiffness may be useful for predicting the response to treatment in patients treated with either dual or triple anti-HCV therapy.

Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 treatment roadmap for resource constrained settings

AIM: To use existing hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral therapies as access to new treatments is limited.

METHODS: A PubMed search for randomised control trials or meta-analysis related to response-guided therapy of HCV genotype 1 patients was undertaken using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PR), boceprevir (B) and telaprevir (T) and lead-in where response-guided therapy at TW4(TW4), 8(TW8), 10(TW10), or 12(TW12) based on HCVRNA(+) or HCVRNA(-). Studies presented at major conferences were also used. Where necessary, a post-hoc analysis was performed. A response-guided management roadmap was created based on sustained virological response (SVR).

RESULTS: Starting with PR, those with HCVRNA(-) at TW4 have > 86% SVR, while those are HCVRNA(+) have 34%-41.7% SVR. HCVRNA(-) TW4 patients can have 24 wk PR if HCVRNA < 400000 IU/mL. Alternatively, 28 wk BPR has similar SVR. If HCVRNA(+) at TW4, 72 wk PR leads to 53% SVR, hence BPR is a better option, and if HCVRNA(-) by TW8, 28 wk therapy is sufficient. If HCVRNA(+) at TW8, then HCVRNA should be checked at TW10 and TW12. By TW12, HCVRNA ≥ 100 IU/mL activates the stopping rule. This roadmap is applicable for treatment-naïve, treatment failures and cirrhotic patients. Validation from an Asia Pacific early access boceprevir program confirmed the findings that HCVRNA(-) at TW4, or TW8 conferred > 80% SVR, leading to the “80-80” rule.

CONCLUSION: Using a roadmap based on HCVRNA(-) at TW4 or TW8 (the “80-80” rule), high SVR can be achieved, and guide the best choices for treatment, and also reduces drug exposure in poor responders.

The host HLA-A*02 allele is associated with the response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles are associated with both the progression of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and the sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy. HLA-A*02 is the most common HLA allele in people of European/Caucasian descent and the Chinese and Japanese population. Therefore, we investigated whether HLA-A*02 expression is associated with disease outcome in Chinese CHC patients. Three hundred thirty-one treatment-naïve CHC patients were recruited in this study. The expression of HLA-A*02 was tested by FACS and LABType SSO assays. All patients were treated weekly with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) according to a standard protocol. Virological response was assessed by TaqMan assay at the 4th, 12th, 24th, and 48th week of therapy, and again at the 24th week post-therapy. By the end of the study, 293 CHC patients, including 144 HLA-A*02-positive patients and 149 HLA-A*02-negative patients, were evaluable for analysis. There were no statistical differences in clinicopathological parameters between HLA-A*02-positive and negative patients before antiviral therapy (P > 0.05). The HLA-A*02-positive patients had a higher rapid virological response (RVR, 74.3 % versus 62.4 %, P = 0.03) and SVR (78.5 % versus 64.4 %, P = 0.01) and a lower relapse rate (4.2 % versus 11.9 %, P = 0.03) than HLA-A*02-negative patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HLA-A*02 expression, liver fibrosis stages <S3, HCV genotype 2a, IL-28B rs8099917 TT, and RVR were independent predictive factors of SVR (P < 0.05). Host HLA-A*02 allele expression is associated with SVR, highlighting the importance of considering HLA-A*02 as a predictor of the response to PEG-IFN/RBV treatment in the Chinese population with CHC.

The hepatitis C genotype 1 paradox: cost per treatment is increasing, but cost per cure is decreasing

Significant attention has been focused on the perceived increase in the cost of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C genotype 1 infection since the approval of the first direct-acting antiviral agents in 2011. Using Canadian list prices, the present analysis points out a paradox: while the cost per antiviral regimen is increasing, the cost per cure is decreasing, especially with interferon-free therapy. In a publicly funded health care system, the lowest cost per cure is a more valuable measure of value for public money than the cost per regimen.

Hepatitis C virus treatment in the 'real-world': how well do 'real' patients respond?

BACKGROUND

Published clinical trials of the treatment of HCV are largely multicentre prospective pharmaceutical trials. Patients in clinical trials tend to have more favorable outcomes than patients in the 'real-world', due to strict patient selection and differences in treatment conditions and available resources.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of Hepatitis C infected patients treated at the Barwon Health Liver Clinic with combination Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and Ribavirin (RBV) therapy and to determine factors associated with a treatment response.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who received treatment for Hepatitis C at our institution's Liver Clinic from January 2001-September 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment-related parameters and side effects were extracted from medical records and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients (120 male, 70 female) with a mean age of 42.8 years (range 20-68 years) commenced treatment. The most common genotype was genotype 3 (48.9%), followed by genotype 1 (42.6%). 150 of 190 patients (78.9%) completed treatment and had end of treatment data available. 107 of 182 patients, (58.8%) for whom sustained virologic response (SVR) rate data was available achieved an SVR. Overall response rates were; 46.9%, 68.8% and 62.4% in genotypes 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The response rate was significantly lower in 29 patients with documented cirrhosis (20.7%). Age, diabetes and alcohol abuse did not predict treatment response in our cohort. Side effects reported in 81.6% of patients included general malaise, hematological disturbance and psychiatric issues, and necessitated cessation of therapy in 16 patients (8.4%) and dose reduction in 26 patients (13.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates to combination PEG-IFN and RBV therapy at our institution are comparable to other 'real-world' and pharmaceutical registration trials. Side effects of combination therapy were prominent but resulted in fewer discontinuations of therapy compared to pharmaceutical trials.

Community-based HCV screening: knowledge and attitudes in a high risk urban population

Background

In an attempt to curtail the rising morbidity and mortality from undiagnosed HCV (hepatitis C virus) in the United States, screening guidelines have been expanded to high-risk individuals and persons born 1945–1965. Community-based screening may be one strategy in which to reach such persons; however, the acceptance of HCV testing, when many high-risk individuals may not have access to HCV specific medications, remains unknown.

Methods

We set out to assess attitudes about HCV screening and knowledge about HCV disease at several community-based testing sites that serve high-risk populations. This assessment was paired with a brief HCV educational intervention, followed by post-education evaluation.

Results

Participants (n = 140) were surveyed at five sites; two homeless shelters, two drug rehabilitation centers, and a women’s "drop-in" center. Personal acceptance of HCV testing was almost unanimous, and 90% of participants reported that they would still want to be tested even if they were unable to receive HCV treatment. Baseline hepatitis C knowledge was poor; however, the brief educational intervention significantly improved knowledge and increased acceptability of testing when medical access issues were explicitly stated.

Conclusions

Despite inconsistencies in access to care and treatment, high-risk communities want to know their HCV status. Though baseline HCV knowledge was poor in this population, a brief on-site educational intervention improved both knowledge and acceptability of HCV testing and care. These data support the establishment of programs that utilize community-based screening, and also provide initial evidence for acceptance of the implementation of the recently expanded screening guidelines among marginalized communities.

Triple therapy with first-generation protease inhibitors for patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: recommendations of the Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF)

The first-generation Protease Inhibitors Boceprevir and Telaprevir administered in triple therapy regimens with Peg-interferon alpha and Ribavirin have been proven effective in increasing the rate of Sustained Virological Response in both naive and treatment-experienced patients with chronic genotype-1 hepatitis C. However, at the individual level, the therapeutic advantage of triple therapy is highly variable and results from the combination of multiple factors related to the characteristics of patient, viral status and liver disease. The recommendations presented are promoted by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, with the aim to help the physician in the decision-making process as well as to manage patients during treatment with triple therapy.

Baseline high viral load and unfavorable patterns of alanine aminotransferase change predict virological relapse in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 or 2 obtaining rapid virological response during antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Rapid virological response (RVR) strongly predicts sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), and abbreviates antiviral therapy in some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors predicting virological relapse (VR) in CHC patients who attained RVR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of 133 CHC patients with an RVR after completing 24 weeks of antiviral therapy (a combination of pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and on-treatment responses were compared between the patients with an SVR and those with VR. Patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at weeks 4 and 12 and at the end-of-treatment (EoT) and patients with elevated, but constantly decreasing, ALT levels were classified as having favorable patterns of ALT change. A trend of increasing ALT levels either between weeks 4 and 12 or between weeks 12 and EoT was classified as unfavorable. A high viral load (HVL) was defined as a baseline HCV RNA ≥ 600000 IU/mL.

RESULTS

In total, 116 (87.2%) patients had a SVR and 14 (10.5%) had VR. The VR rates were comparable between patients with genotype-1 (13.1%) and genotype-2 infection (8.7%) (P = 0.572). Multivariate analysis revealed that HVL (P = 0.015; odds ratio [OR] = 14.754; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.671-130.240), and unfavorable ALT patterns (P = 0.039; OR = 4.397; 95% CI = 1.078-17.930) independently predicted VR. In subgroup analysis, low viral load (LVL) patients had a minimal VR rate (1.8%). Among the HVL patients, the VR rate of those using peg-IFN-α-2a was relatively low (9.1%). Patients using peg-IFN-α-2b had a slightly higher VR rate (23.8%; P = 0.128), and patients with favorable patterns of ALT changes had a lower VR rate (10.3%) compared to the 53.8% in patients with unfavorable ALT patterns (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In southern Taiwan, 24 weeks of antiviral therapy achieved a high SVR rate in patients with CHC attaining RVR, except in the subgroup of patients treated with peg-IFN-α-2b with HVL and on-treatment unfavorable ALT patterns.

Long-term leukocyte natural α-interferon and ribavirin treatment in hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with leukocyte natural α-interferon (ln-α-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV).

METHODS: Forty-six patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence received 3 MU three times a week of ln-α-IFN plus RBV for 1 mo; then, patients with good tolerability (n = 30) were switched to daily IFN administration, while the remaining were treated with the same schedule. Patients have been treated for 12 mo after viral clearance while non-responders (NR) entered in the long-term treatment group. Liver biopsies were planned at baseline, 1 year after sustained virological response (SVR) and at 36 mo after start of therapy in NR. MedCalc software package was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: About 16.7% of genotype 1-4 and 70% of genotype 2-3 patients achieved SVR. Nine patients withdrew therapy because of non-tolerance or non-compliance. A significant improvement in serum biochemistry and histological activity was observed in all SVR patients and long-term treated; 100% of patients with SVR achieved a histological response (fibrosis stabilization or improvement) with a significant reduction in mean staging value (from 2.1 to 1.0; P = 0.0031); histological response was observed in 84% of long-term treated patients compared to 57% of drop-out. Six patients died during the entire study period (follow-up 40.6 ± 7.7 mo); of them, 5 presented with severe HCV recurrence on enrollment. Diabetes (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.08-0.59, P = 0.01), leukopenia (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.03-0.57, P = 0.03) and severe HCV recurrence (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.25-0.69, P = 0.0003) were variables associated to survival. Long-term treatment was well tolerated; no patients developed rejection or autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment improves histology in SVR patients and slows disease progression also in NR, leading to a reduction in liver decompensation, graft failure and liver-related death.

A retrospective study of peginterferon plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who had undergone previous antiviral therapy

AIM: To evaluate the virologic responses and safety of peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy for treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in patients who had undergone previous antiviral therapy.

METHODS: All patients were divided into two groups based on the type of previously used interferon. Virologic responses, including rapid virologic response (RVR), early virologic response (EVR), end-of-treatment virologic response (ETR) and sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse rate and discontinuation rate were assessed after retreatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin.

RESULTS: For CHC patients previously treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin, retreatment by the same regimen might be associated with lower RVR, EVR, ETR and SVR rates (21.1% vs 40.5%, 26.3% vs 43.2%, 47.4% vs 56.8%, 31.6% vs 46.0%) and a higher relapse rate (33.3% vs 19.0%), but no significance was found compared with those treated with standard interferon (all P > 0.05). Achieving EVR might be a positive factor for achieving SVR in patients previously treated with interferons (IFNs) (OR = 20.43, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION: Peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy is effective for CHC patients previously treated with IFNs; however, retreatment with the same regimen for CHC patients previously treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin is not recommended. Achieving EVR might be a positive factor for achieving SVR in patients previously treated with IFNs.

Estimates of HCV-1 patients attaining RVR following dual therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Given the significant side-effects and healthcare costs associated with telaprevir- or boceprevir-combination therapy, identifying patients likely to respond to dual therapy peg-interferon (Peg-IFN)/ribavirin is highly desirable. Since the perception of how large the pool of patients who may achieve rapid virologic response (RVR) is vaguely ascertained, we searched the literature for this information.

METHODS

Studies on patients treated with Peg-IFN/ribavirin were identified by searching MEDLINE and analyzed by meta-analysis. The primary end point was weighted estimates of RVR. The influence on race/ethnicity, baseline viremia, type of Peg-IFN, ribavirin dosage, and significant hepatic fibrosis on the results was evaluated.

RESULTS

Across 38 studies on 13,219 patients, the fraction of RVR patients was 19.6 %. The only baseline factor influencing RVR was race/ethnicity, with higher rates in Asian (26.7 %) and Caucasian patients (22.5 %). Of the 1,735 RVR patients, 85.1 % attained sustained virologic response (SVR). In these, SVR was influenced by ribavirin dose (86.8 vs. 72.8 % for high or low), type of Peg-IFN (91.8 % for alpha-2b vs. 82.9 % for alpha-2a), and treatment duration (91.7 % for 48 weeks vs. 79.4 % for 24 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

One fifth to one fourth of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) patients can be safely treated with dual therapy of Peg-IFN/ribavirin, and may be spared from cost and inconvenience of regimens considering the addition of HCV protease inhibitors.

Assessing the cost utility of response-guided therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 in the UK using the MONARCH model

BACKGROUND

European guidelines advocate the measurement of on-treatment hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in order to determine optimal therapy duration (response-guided therapy [RGT]) in patients with rapid virological response (RVR) or delayed virological response (DVR). Treatment response is highly dependent upon the extent of liver fibrosis yet there is little evidence quantifying the cost effectiveness of RGT particularly conditional upon fibrosis stage.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes an economic model designed to assess the costs and benefits of RGT compared with standard duration of therapy (SDT) in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 patients.

METHODS

A Markov cohort simulation model with lifetime perspective was developed to undertake a cost utility analysis of RGT in the UK. Patients entered the model at Metavir disease stages F0-F4, and progressed through these stages via age and duration of HCV infection-dependent transition probabilities. Treated patients were partitioned according to virological response and shortened or extended duration of therapy was applied following European guidelines.

RESULTS

For all patients, SDT and RGT was associated with an increase of 2.14 and 2.20 QALYs and £2,374 and £2,270 costs, respectively, compared with no treatment. Overall, RGT was a dominant scenario being associated with a lower risk of complications, increased QALYs (0.08) and cost saving (£101). RGT across fibrosis stages was either highly cost effective or dominant; in all cases RGT was associated with an increase in QALYs, driven by a reduction in complications in DVR subjects and reduced exposure to treatment disutility in RVR subjects; costs were lower in F1 and F2 fibrosis stages. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY, overall RGT across fibrosis stages F2-F4 were associated with the highest probability of being cost effective. At this threshold, the probability of reduced/extended therapy in RVR/DVR patients being cost effective is 0.35 and 0.88, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that the treatment of HCV genotype 1 patients in fibrosis stage F2 has the greatest potential for maximizing health benefit and cost saving within an RGT protocol. Predicting those patients most likely to respond to treatments is important from both a clinical and cost perspective and the tailoring of treatment duration with the current standard of care is likely to remain a priority for payers with budgetary constraints.

Revisiting the predictors of a sustained virologic response in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus

Several host (age, sex, race, fibrosis stage, interleukin 28B polymorphism) and viral factors (hepatitis C virus [HCV] genotype, viral load) allow estimating the response to interferon-based therapies (which includes first-generation protease inhibitors) before treatment. However, treatment should not be denied to any patient based on unfavorable factors alone. Metabolic conditions associated with poor response (diabetes, insulin resistance, obesity) and alcohol abuse can be influenced before starting treatment. "On-treatment" predictors of response allow treatment to be tailored to the individual need of the patient. Patients with undetectable HCV RNA after 4 weeks (rapid virologic response [RVR]) have the highest chance for cure (>85%) both by dual and triple therapy. For triple therapy, the decision to shorten treatment requires that the virus remains undetectable for an additional 8 (telaprevir) to 20 (boceprevir) weeks (extended RVR). Based on viral kinetics, an even earlier prediction after 2 weeks of treatment with direct acting antivirals appears feasible.

HCV genotype 1a shows a better virological response to antiviral therapy than HCV genotype 1b

Background

The impact of viral subtype on the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy in patients chronically infected with hepatitis C genotype 1 subtype 1a and 1b has not been extensively investigated. The aim of this study is to determine whether the HCV genotype 1 subtypes 1a and 1b respond differently to treatment with PEGylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin.

Methods

For 48 weeks, 388 “naïve”genotype 1 patients were treated weekly with PEG-IFN α-2a or PEG-INF α-2b combined with daily ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day). The numbers of patients in whom HCV-RNA was undetectable were compared after 4 (rapid virological response, RVR), 12 (early virological response, EVR), and 48 (end treatment virological response, ETR) weeks of treatment as well as 24 weeks after the last treatment (sustained virological response, SVR).

Results

The rate of SVR was higher in subtype 1a patients than subtype 1b patients (55% vs. 43%; p < 0.02). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that infection with genotype 1a (odds ratio(OR) : 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4 to 4.1), age < 50 years (OR:7.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 21.2), alanine aminotransferase level (ALT)<100 IU/ml (OR:2.1; 95% CI: 1.3 to3.5), HCV-RNA < 5.6 log₁₀ IU/ml (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.7 to 6.9) and fibrosis score < S3 (OR: 3.8; 95% CI:3.2 to 7.4), were all independent predictors of SVR.

Conclusion

Dual antiviral therapy is more effective against HCV subtype 1a than against subtype 1b and this difference is independent of other factors that may favour viral clearance.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01342003

Treatment of patients with HCV related cirrhosis: many rewards with very few risks

Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is aimed at the persistent eradication of the virus, the so-called sustained virological response (SVR), with the aim ultimately being to prevent the development of liver-related complications and improve patients' survival. Patients with HCV-related compensated cirrhosis are the group most likely to benefit from viral clearance, as several retrospective studies have shown liver complications rates to be positively modified by the achievement of a SVR. Whether these benefits rely on viral clearance or on the histological improvements seen following successful interferon (IFn)-based therapies has recently been a matter for debate, as studies have shown cirrhosis to regress in some patients with a SVR. Whatever the mechanisms, cirrhosis has the uncanny ability to be both a dominant indication for therapy, as well as one of the strongest baseline factors associated with reduced efficacy of any IFn-based regimen. This has led to the development of alternative treatment strategies, such as low dose pegylated IFn (PegIFn) monotherapy, that unfortunately has proven to be of limited efficacy. For this reason regimens able to clear the virus without relying on the broad antiviral effect of IFN are eagerly awaited.

Differences in clinical outcomes among hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a meta-analysis

Background

With the development of new direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C, the backbone peginterferon alpha used may be of importance in maximizing treatment outcomes. To this end, the rates of sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse, and treatment discontinuation among hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin were determined using a meta-analysis.

Methods

Randomized trials examining peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b co-administered with ribavirin for 48 weeks were included. Data were extracted on SVR, relapse, and treatment discontinuations for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Pooled proportions using fixed and random effects meta-analysis were calculated.

Results

Twenty-six trials provided data on patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, and 19 trials provided data on patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Five trials were direct head-to-head evaluations. In the subset of trials that included head-to-head evaluations, no significant differences were observed between the two treatments for treatment-naïve (relative risk [RR]: 1.07, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.97–1.18) and treatment-experienced patients (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.58–2.77). Using only active trial arms, a larger proportion of the treatment- naïve patients who were provided peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin achieved a SVR (47%), which is greater than that of treatment-naïve patients who were provided peginterferon alpha- 2b plus ribavirin (40% SVR achievement); however, a larger proportion of treatment- experienced patients who were provided peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin achieved a SVR (16%) when compared with treatment-experienced patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin (12% SVR achievement). A larger proportion of relapses occurred among both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, when compared with treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients taking peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment was greater among treatment-naïve patients taking peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, but smaller among treatment-experienced patients.

Conclusion

There are small differences in treatment outcomes for different types of peginterferon- alpha. Patient status and complexity of administration may differentiate clinical outcomes.

Serum PAI-1 is a novel predictor for response to pegylated interferon-α-2b plus ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Obesity and insulin resistance have been reported as negative predictors for sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infected patients treated with pegylated interferon-α plus ribavirin. They are also known to affect serum levels of several cytokines including adipocytokines. But the association between these cytokines and treatment outcome has not been fully elucidated. We examined pretreatment serum levels of 14 cytokines among 190 patients who were treated with pegylated interferon-α-2b plus ribavirin for chronic HCV-1b infection with high viral load (≥ 5 log IU/mL) and analyzed their contribution to treatment response. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), vascular endothelial growth factor, and 11 clinical factors showed significant association with SVR in univariate logistic regression analysis. Four significant factors in multivariate analysis; serum PAI-1 (odds ratio [OR] = 15.42), body mass index (OR = 4.56), rs8099917 (OR = 4.95) and fibrosis stage (OR = 5.18) were identified as independent predictors. We constructed a simple and minimally invasive prediction score for SVR based on the presence of these factors except for fibrosis stage. The accuracy of this score was 73%, and was confirmed using an independent validation cohort consisting of 31 patients (68%). The strongest correlation was between PAI-1 level and platelet count (r = 0.38, P = 1.8 × 10(-7)), and PAI-1 level was inversely correlated with fibrosis stage. Serum PAI-1 is a novel predictor for the response to combination therapy against chronic HCV-1b infection and may be associated with liver fibrosis.

Future treatment of patients with HCV cirrhosis

Of all hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, those with cirrhosis are most in need of treatment because of increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment with pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) (PR) has definitely shown the benefits of successful treatment by improving fibrosis, causing the regression of cirrhosis and reducing and preventing cirrhosis-related complications. However, the sustained virological response (SVR) is lower in patients with cirrhosis. First generation protease inhibitors (boceprevir and telaprevir) in combination with PR are a major advancement in the treatment of both naïve and treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients. In naïve patients, the SVR rate with the triple regimen with boceprevir was increased by 14% in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with PR. This benefit was lower than that observed in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis (30%). The SVR rate of the triple regimen with telaprevir was increased by 10-30% compared with PR in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with nearly 30% in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis. In treatment-experienced patients, previous relapsers have the highest increase in SVR with the triple regimen compared with PR, whatever the status of fibrosis. Previous partial or non-responder patients with cirrhosis had lower SVR rates than those without cirrhosis. However, the benefits of telaprevir and boceprevir vs PR was maintained. Previous non-responder patients with cirrhosis benefited the least from treatment. The relapse rate was always higher and side effects were more frequent in patients with cirrhosis compared with those without. First generation protease inhibitors plus PR appear to be a new step forward in the management of HCV genotype 1 patients with cirrhosis.

Clinical drivers in naïve patient eligibility for treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a major health problem, being a leading cause of cirrhosis and liver transplantation worldwide. Viral eradication achieved by Peginterferon and Ribavirin therapy is the only therapeutic option that can prevent fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis and liver-related complications in cirrhotic patients. Unfortunately, the occurrence of potentially serious side effects argues against universal treatment of HCV-infected patients. Indeed most scientific societies suggest that eligibility for therapy be based on baseline factors, the so called clinical drivers for treatment eligibility. Current international guidelines recommend focusing on the severity of liver disease, likelihood of treatment response in terms of chances of sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy and risk of serious adverse events when making treatment decisions. However, evidence exists that treatment may benefit also patients with mild fibrosis and that baseline predictions of a SVR are inaccurate because of the key role of HCV kinetics while on-therapy. An extended treatment programme is further supported by the fact that an increase in the number of patients treated would ultimately result in a long-term reduction of liver-related deaths.

A review of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Cirrhosis developing during chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) poses a risk of anticipated liver-related death, therefore representing a dominant indication to anti-HCV therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the efficacy and safety of treatment of HCV infection in cirrhotic patients with respect to the clinical stage of the disease.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, as well as the conference proceedings from the annual meetings of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the European Association for the Study of the Liver, and the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, were searched for articles published in English from January 1990 through May 2010, fulfilling the following criteria: (1) randomized, prospective observational, retrospective, or meta-analysis; (2) involving adult patients with chronic HCV infection; and (3) data (fibrosis stage, treatment regimen, efficacy, safety) available for cirrhotics. Reviews were excluded. Search terms included chronic hepatitis C, fibrosis, cirrhosis, interferon alfa, ribavirin, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver decompensation.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were identified. The rates of sustained virologic response to pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin ranged from 10% to 44% for HCV genotypes 1/4 to 33% to 72% for genotypes 2/3 in compensated cirrhosis, while falling to 0% to 16% and 44% to 57%, respectively, in the decompensated stage, compared with 29% to 55% for genotypes 1/4 and 70% to 80% for genotypes 2/3 in noncirrhotic patients (compensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis: P < 0.001 for genotypes 1/4 and P = 0.002 for genotypes 2/3; decompensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis: P < 0.001 for all genotypes). HCV clearance was associated with a reduced risk of liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma development, liver-related mortality, and hepatitis recurrence after liver transplantation. Treatment during compensated cirrhosis proved to be most cost-effective versus treatment after decompensation or a no-treatment strategy. Headache (54%), irritability (38%), fatigue (34%), and nausea (30%) were the most common adverse events in compensated patients, while anorexia (100%), fatigue (59%), neutropenia (53%), and thrombocytopenia (50%) were most common in decompensated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-HCV treatment in cirrhotic patients was less effective than in noncirrhotic patients. Viral eradication reduced the risk of liver complications and improved survival in noncirrhotics. Based on effectiveness and tolerability data, therapy has a significant effect in patients with compensated cirrhosis, while decompensated patients need to weigh the risks versus benefits of treatment.

Virological response is associated with decline in hemoglobin concentration during pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy in hepatitis C virus genotype 1

Anemia may increase the likelihood of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) during pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. To determine whether hemoglobin decline is associated with SVR, we retrospectively evaluated the CHARIOT study of 871 treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1 patients. Anemia (serum hemoglobin <100 g/L) occurred in 137 (16%) patients, of whom only 14 (10%) received erythropoietin. Hemoglobin decline >30g/L from baseline occurred in 76% of patients overall, including 526 patients who did not become anemic. Virological responses were higher in anemic patients compared with those who did not develop anemia (end of treatment, 80% versus 65%, P = 0.003; SVR, 61% versus 50%, P = 0.02); these differences remained significant when patients receiving erythropoietin were excluded from analysis. SVR was also higher in patients with hemoglobin decline >30 g/L compared with patients without a similar decline. In multiple logistic regression analyses with treatment group and baseline characteristics, the odds ratio for SVR was 1.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.62) for anemia and 2.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.62) for hemoglobin decline >30 g/L. Patients who first developed a hemoglobin decline >30 g/L during weeks 5-12 and 13-48 were more likely to achieve SVR than those who first developed such changes in weeks 0-4 or who never experienced them.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who develop anemia or experience a hemoglobin decline >30 g/L during weeks 5-48 of therapy achieve higher virological responses to pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy that are unrelated to erythropoietin use.