Partial hepatectomy vs. transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a randomized controlled trial

Large-Scale Transcriptome Analysis Identified a Novel Cancer Driver Genes Signature for Predicting the Prognostic of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor with high mortality and heterogeneity. Genetic mutations caused by driver genes are important contributors to the formation of the tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this study is to discuss the expression of cancer driver genes in tumor tissues and their clinical value in predicting the prognosis of HCC.

Methods: All data were sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public databases. Differentially expressed and prognostic genes were screened by the expression distribution of the cancer driver genes and their relationship with survival. Candidate genes were subjected to functional enrichment and transcription factor regulatory network. We further constructed a prognostic signature and analyzed the survival outcomes and immune status between different risk groups.

Results: Most cancer driver genes are specifically expressed in cancer tissues. Driver genes may influence HCC progression through processes such as transcription, cell cycle, and T-cell receptor-related pathways. Patients in different risk groups had significant survival differences (p < 0.05), and risk scores showed high predictive efficacy (AUC>0.69). Besides, risk subgroups were also associated with multiple immune functions and immune cell content.

Conclusion: We confirmed the critical role of cancer driver genes in mediating HCC progression and the immune microenvironment. Risk subgroups contribute to the assessment of prognostic value in different patients and explain the heterogeneity of HCC.

Critical systematic review on hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Whether to submit to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic resection (HR) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a debated issue. We conducted a systematic review to critically analyze what evidence supports the use of TACE, in a specific clinical condition that can define HCC as 'intermediate'. In addition, we analyzed literature regarding the comparison between TACE and HR. Direct comparisons, between HR and TACE, strongly support the adoption of surgery for patients with large or multinodular HCCs since, albeit 'nonideal' surgical candidates, these patients can still obtain a survival benefit. Multidisciplinary teams can mitigate the different decision-making approach of surgeons and hepatologists with the aim of obtaining the best quality of care.

Survival benefit of liver resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Although transarterial chemoembolization is recommended as the standard treatment for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC-B HCC), other treatments including liver resection have been used. This study aimed to determine the survival benefit of treatment strategies including resection for BCLC-B HCC compared with non-surgical treatments.

Methods

The nationwide multicentre database of the Korean Liver Cancer Association was reviewed. Patients with BCLC-B HCC who underwent liver resection as a first or second treatment within 2 years of diagnosis and patients who received non-surgical treatment were selected randomly. Survival outcomes of propensity score-matched groups were compared.

Results

Among 887 randomly selected patients with BCLC-B HCC, 83 underwent liver resection as first or second treatment and 597 had non-surgical treatment. After propensity score matching, the two groups were well balanced (80 patients in each group). Overall median survival in the resection group was better than that for patients receiving non-surgical treatment (50·9 versus 22·1 months respectively; P &lt; 0·001). The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the resection group were 90, 88, 75 and 63 per cent, compared with 79, 48, 35 and 22 per cent in the no-surgery group (P &lt; 0·001). In multivariable analysis, non-surgical treatment only (hazard ratio (HR) 3·35, 95 per cent c.i. 2·16 to 5·19; P &lt; 0·001), albumin level below 3·5 g/dl (HR 1·96, 1·22 to 3·15; P = 0·005) and largest tumour size greater than 5·0 cm (HR 1·81, 1·20 to 2·75; P = 0·005) were independent predictors of worse overall survival.

Conclusion

Treatment strategies that include liver resection offer a survival benefit compared with non-surgical treatments for potentially resectable BCLC-B HCC.