Clinical utility of TREAT-B score in African and non-African HBV-infected patients living in Europe

Nomogram for evaluating obvious liver inflammation in treatment-naïve HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection patients with normal ALT

The purpose of this study was to develop an effective and non-invasive nomogram for evaluating liver obvious inflammation in untreated HBeAg positive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. A nomogram was established on a model cohort of 292 treatment-naïve HBeAg positive patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT ≤40 U/L) at Beijing Ditan Hospital from January 2008 to March 2018. Then the nomogram was prospectively validated in a cohort of 88 patients from July 2019 to May 2021. Calibration curves and Concordance index were used to evaluate the accuracy of prediction and identification performance of the model. In untreated HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection patients with normal ALT, the formula for predicting liver inflammation was Logit (P) =-0.91-0.41×log10 (qHBeAg)+0.11×AST-0.01×PLT. The nomogram had C-index of 0.751 (95% CI, 0.688-0.815), indicating a good consistency between prediction and real observation on the model cohort. The validation cohort confirmed its good performance. In this study, liver inflammation nomograms based on HBeAg, AST, and PLT were established and verified in treatment-naïve HBeAg positive chronic HBV patients with normal ALT.

Validation of a novel point-of-care test for alanine aminotransferase measurement: A pilot cohort study

BACKGROUND

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measurement is essential for evaluation of liver disease. We validated a novel rapid point-of-care (POC) test for ALT1 against laboratory ALT.

METHODS

Stored plasma samples from adults with chronic liver disease (Test cohort n = 240; Validation cohort n = 491) were analysed using the BioPoint® antigen immunoassay POC ALT1 lateral flow test, which provides quantitative ALT results (Axxin handheld reader) or semi-quantitative results (visual read, cut off 40 IU/ml). The accuracy of POC ALT1 to detect ALT > 40 IU/L was determined by ROC analysis. In patients with chronic hepatitis B, treatment eligibility (EASL criteria) was determined using POC ALT1 and compared to laboratory ALT.

RESULTS

POC ALT1 test had good accuracy for laboratory ALT > 40 IU/L: AUROC 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) in the Test cohort and AUROC 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) in the Validation cohort. POC ALT1 cut off of 0.8 for ALT > 40 IU/L maximised sensitivity (97%) and specificity (71%) in the Test cohort (42% laboratory ALT > 40 IU/L) and yielded PPV 84% and NPV 91% in the Validation cohort (19% laboratory ALT > 40 IU/L). Semi-quantitative POC ALT1 had good accuracy for laboratory ALT in the Validation cohort (AUROC 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99; sensitivity 77% and specificity 93%). Combined with HBV DNA and transient elastography, both quantitative and semi-quantitative POC ALT1 tests had good accuracy for excluding hepatitis B treatment needs (sensitivity 96%, specificity 78% and NPV 99%).

CONCLUSION

The POC ALT1 test had good accuracy for elevated ALT levels and for determining treatment eligibility among people with chronic hepatitis B.

Health inequalities in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in patients from sub-Saharan Africa in high-income countries

Chronic hepatitis B virus disproportionately affects migrant communities in high-income countries, reflecting increased migration from sub-Saharan Africa. Chronic hepatitis B virus is endemic in sub-Saharan Africa, yet the natural history of chronic infection experienced by patients remains incompletely understood, with evidence of variability across genotypes and regions within sub-Saharan Africa. Clinical guidelines recommending treatment thresholds are not specific to sub-Saharan African patients and are based on natural history studies from Western Pacific Asian countries. Access to standard of care treatment is available for sub-Saharan African people with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in high-income countries; however, the evidence base for these treatments was not established in this cohort and areas of uncertainty remain, particularly regarding HCC surveillance and treatment discontinuation. Participation in phase III clinical trials for chronic hepatitis B therapies is almost non-existent amongst sub-Saharan African patients, even when residing in high-income countries that participate in multicentre trials. Engagement with sub-Saharan African patients with chronic hepatitis B in high-income countries is challenging because of the stigma associated with the diagnosis, absence of routine screening systems and the complexities involved in navigating the healthcare system. Nonetheless, improved engagement is critical if we are to achieve global hepatitis B virus elimination.

Assessment and simplification of treatment eligibility among patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Treatment eligibility and the accuracy of its simplified criteria have been poorly documented in patients with chronic HBV infection worldwide, especially in low-and-middle-income countries.

METHODS

From a cohort of HBV-infected patients in Vietnam, we assessed the proportion of patients eligible for treatment using the national guidelines based on reference tests (HBV DNA quantification and FibroScan); and the accuracy of simplified treatment criteria free from HBV DNA and FibroScan (TREAT-B score and simplified WHO criteria) to select patients for antiviral therapy using the national guidelines as a reference.

RESULTS

We analysed 400 consecutive treatment-naïve HBV-monoinfected patients: 49% males, median age 38 years (range: 18-86), 32% HBeAg-positive, median HBV DNA 4.8 log10 IU/ml (undetectable-8.4), median FibroScan 5.3kPa (3.0-67.8), 25% having significant liver fibrosis including 12% with cirrhosis. Of them 167 (42%) fulfilled treatment criteria according to the national guidelines. Using the national criteria as a reference, the performance of TREAT-B to select patients for treatment was high (AUROC: 0.89 (95%CI: 0.87-0.92)) with a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 88.4%. In a subset of patients with two ALT measurements over a 6-month period (n=89), the AUROC of TREAT-B was significantly higher than that of the simplified WHO criteria (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that a large proportion of patients with chronic HBV infection require antiviral therapy in Vietnam. Compared to the simplified WHO criteria free from HBV DNA quantification, TREAT-B is a better alternative to easily indicate treatment eligibility and might help scale-up treatment intervention in Vietnam.