Refining prediction of survival after TIPS with the novel Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival

Muscle fat content correlates with postoperative survival of viral-related cirrhosis patients after the TIPS: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Early prediction of the prognosis of viral-related cirrhosis patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is beneficial for clinical decision-making. The aim of this study is to explore a comprehensive prognostic assessment model for evaluating the survival outcomes of patients post-TIPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 155 patients treated with TIPS were included in the study. The data were collected from electronic records. The nutritional status of the patient is evaluated using imaging examinations measuring by the axial CT images from the L3 vertebral level. The primary endpoint was set as death within 1 year after TIPS. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine the factors associated with mortality.

RESULTS

The Cox regression analysis revealed that the lower PMFI was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality after TIPS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.159, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.063-1.263, p = 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analyses according to gender revealed the PMFI was associated with postoperative death both in male (HR 2.125, 95% CI, 1.147-3.936, p = 0.017) and female patients (HR 1.070, 95% CI, 1.001-1.144, p = 0.047). The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting death within 1 year was 0.807. The clinical impact curve analysis showed that PMFI had higher levels of risk threshold probability and a smaller gap between actual and predicted curves.

CONCLUSIONS

In viral-related cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension, increased muscle fat content might be a potential prognostic marker and associated with postoperative death after TIPS.

Association Between Older Age and TIPS-Related Hospitalization Following Shunt Placement

Background and Aims: Patients experience more complications of portal hypertension as liver disease progresses, many of which can be managed by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. Controversy surrounds the association of age with TIPS-related complications. We sought to evaluate the effect of age on TIPS-associated outcomes, including hospital admissions. Methods: This retrospective, bicentric cohort study included patients who underwent TIPS insertion between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016. The primary outcome of the study was predictors of liver-related hospital admission within 12 months of TIPS insertion between patients < 70 years and ≥ 70 years old. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 12 months and MELD-Na score at 90 days following TIPS placement. Results: A total of 593 patients were included in the study-487 patients were less than 70 years old while 106 patients were 70 years of age or older. Near equal percentages of elderly and nonelderly patients were admitted with post-TIPS complications within 12 months of insertion (29.2% v. 29.0%, p=0.91). Pre-existing diagnoses of diabetes and/or hypertension, hepatic hydrothorax, as well as serum creatinine and/or serum sodium at the time of TIPS insertion were associated with TIPS-related admissions within the first 12 months of shunt insertion. Conclusion: TIPS placement in selected older patients can be safe. Age should not be a strict contraindication for TIPS insertion, but discussion regarding risks and benefits of the procedure should be individualized.

Recompensation of Liver Cirrhosis by TIPS Reduces Epithelial Cell Death Markers, Translating Into Improved Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Portal hypertension is the main pathophysiological driver of decompensation in patients with liver cirrhosis. Epithelial cell death markers, m30 and m65, correlate with hepatic injury and predict outcomes across various stages of liver disease. We aim (i) to evaluate whether portal hypertension itself contributes to liver outcome-relevant epithelial injury, and (ii) to analyse the capacity of m30/m65 to predict outcome in patients receiving a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for refractory ascites.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients undergoing TIPS placement for refractory ascites and 20 patients with compensated cirrhosis as controls were prospectively enrolled in this monocentric cohort study. Epithelial cell death markers were analysed pre-TIPS, as well as 1-3 and 6-9 months post-TIPS. The capacity of baseline levels of m30/m65 in predicting six-month transplant-free survival rates was analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Levels of m30 and m65 were higher in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (pre-TIPS) compared with compensated cirrhosis (controls). Following correction of portal hypertension by TIPS and recompensation, both markers decreased over time, reaching levels comparable to patients with compensated cirrhosis. On multivariable analysis, pre-TIPS baseline levels of m30 and m65 were not predictive for six-month survival.

CONCLUSION

Correction of portal hypertension via TIPS reduces levels of epithelial cell death markers, indicating that portal hypertension is a driver of outcome-relevant, hepatic cell death in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Baseline m30/m65 values do not affect six-month survival rates, which suggests that TIPS placement overcomes the unfavourable spontaneous prognosis otherwise indicated by elevated baseline m30/65 levels.

Predictors of long-term clinical outcomes after TIPS: An ALTA group study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While TIPS is traditionally considered a bridge to liver transplant (LT), some patients achieve long-term transplant-free survival (TFS) with TIPS alone. Prognosis and need for LT should not only be assessed at time of procedure, but also re-evaluated in patients with favorable early outcomes.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adult recipients of TIPS in the multicenter advancing liver therapeutic approaches retrospective cohort study were included (N=1127 patients; 2040 person-years follow-up). Adjusted competing risk regressions were used to assess factors associated with long-term post-TIPS clinical outcomes at the time of procedure and 6 months post-TIPS. MELD-Na at TIPS was significantly associated with post-TIPS mortality (subdistribution hazards ratio of death 1.1 [ p =0.42], 1.3 [ p =0.04], and 1.7 [ p <0.01] for MELD-Na 15-19, 20-24, and ≥25 relative to MELD-Na <15, respectively). MELD 3.0 was also associated with post-TIPS outcomes. Among the 694 (62%) patients who achieved early (6 mo) post-TIPS TFS, rates of long-term TFS were 88% at 1 year and 57% at 3 years post-TIPS. Additionally, a within-individual increase in MELD-Na score of >3 points from TIPS to 6 months post-TIPS was significantly associated with long-term mortality, regardless of initial MELD-Na score (subdistribution hazards ratio of death 1.8, p <0.01). For patients with long-term post-TIPS TFS, rates of complications of the TIPS or portal hypertension were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with early post-TIPS TFS, prognosis and need for LT should be reassessed, informed by postprocedure changes in MELD-Na and clinical status. For selected patients, "destination TIPS" without LT may offer long-term survival with freedom from portal hypertensive complications.

Early Dynamics of Portal Pressure Gradient After TIPS Insertion Predict Mortality

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement leads to a reduction in portal pressure and an improvement in survival in patients with recurrent and refractory ascites and variceal haemorrhage. Prediction of post-TIPS survival is primarily determined by factors identified before the TIPS procedure, as data collected during or after TIPS implantation are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of early hemodynamic changes after TIPS placement on survival, in order to refine post TIPS management.

METHODS

In this prospective bicentric study, consecutive patients (n = 105) undergoing TIPS placement for ascites or variceal haemorrhage underwent measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPG) immediately at TIPS insertion (PPG0) and 24 h later (PPG24h) and the ΔPPG was calculated from PPG24h and PPG0 (ΔPPG = PPG24h-PPG0). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and uni- and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify survival predictors.

RESULTS

Patients with lack of increased ΔPPG exhibited poorer 90-day and 1-year survival compared to patients with increased ΔPPG. This worse survival was independent of The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Child-Pugh score, bilirubin levels, creatinine and the Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS) > 0.92. Among these patients with poorer outcome, elevated bilirubin (> 25 μmol/L) further distinguished survivors from non-survivors.

CONCLUSION

Lack of increased ΔPPG post-TIPS insertion identifies a high-risk patient group with worse survival. We propose incorporating this second PPG measurement and determining ΔPPG into clinical practice to identify these patients early and tailor post-TIPS patient care.

Early Occurrence of Hepatic Encephalopathy Following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Insertion is Linked to Impaired Survival: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, the prognostic significance of overt HE post-TIPS remains controversial.

METHODS

We screened 2137 patients who underwent TIPS insertion at 8 German tertiary care centers between 2004 and 2021. Patients with pre-emptive TIPS placement, hepatocellular carcinoma, missing data, and non-PTFE covered stents were excluded. Competing risk analysis was performed, considering liver transplantation as a competing event. To correct for immortal time bias, landmark analyses were conducted, with the landmark being set at 30 and 90 days post-TIPS. Outcome data were assessed for up to 30 months post-TIPS insertion.

RESULTS

A total of 1356 patients (median Model for End-stage Liver Disease [MELD], 13 [interquartile range (IQR), 10-17]; age, 60 years [IQR, 54-67 years]; 64% male; 12% HE before TIPS), were included. Overall, HE post-TIPS was linked to impaired survival (P < .001; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.15-1.73). However, this was only confirmed if HE occurred within the first 30 days post-TIPS (early HE; P < .001; sHR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.59-2.57). Additionally, patients with a history of HE (P < .001; sHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.21-2.07) and history of HE and early HE post-TIPS (P < .001; sHR, 3.44; 95% CI, 2.34-5.04) showed impaired survival. These findings were confirmed in the landmark and multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Early HE post-TIPS is associated with significantly reduced survival. Therefore, patients who experience early HE or have a history of HE should be closely monitored by physicians, as they constitute a particularly vulnerable group with impaired survival.

Optimal timing for TIPS and PSE combination treatment in patients with cirrhosis-related variceal bleeding and hypersplenism

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the optimal timing for the combination of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and partial splenic embolization (PSE) in patients with cirrhosis-related variceal bleeding and hypersplenism. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either an early or late combination of TIPS and PSE.

METHODS

A total of 84 consecutive patients with cirrhosis-related variceal bleeding and hypersplenism who underwent TIPS and PSE between September 2016 and April 2023 were included in this retrospective multicenter study. These patients were subsequently divided into early combination (n = 36) and late combination (n = 48) groups based on the timing of the combination therapy.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a significant increase in cumulative survival in the late combination group, compared with that in the early combination group (log-rank P = 0.018). Additionally, the late combination group exhibited a lower cumulative incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), compared with the early combination group (log-rank P = 0.002). In Cox regression models, noninfarcted splenic volume (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.995, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.991-0.999, P = 0.044) and grouping (HR = 0.101, 95% CI = 0.011-0.921, P = 0.034) were identified as independent risk factors for mortality. Furthermore, the independent risk factors for OHE were serum albumin (ALB) level (P = 0.032) and grouping (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

The early combination of TIPS and PSE was associated with higher risks of death and OHE than the late combination.

Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS) identifies patients at risk of further decompensation and ACLF after TIPS

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS) defines a high-risk group of patients with significantly reduced survival following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation. However, the clinical hallmarks responsible for these patients' unfavorable outcome remain to be identified. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize the clinical course after TIPS implantation according to the FIPS.

METHODS

A total of 1,359 patients with cirrhosis allocated to TIPS implantation for treatment of recurrent or refractory ascites or secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding from eight tertiary centers were retrospectively included. The patients' clinical course following TIPS placement was analyzed, stratified according to the FIPS. The primary study outcome was further decompensation within 90 days after TIPS; secondary outcomes were acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) within 90 days and 1-year transplant-free survival.

RESULTS

Further decompensation after TIPS implantation was significantly more frequent in FIPS high-risk patients compared to low-risk patients (cumulative incidence function 0.58 vs. 0.38, p <0.001). Moreover, FIPS high-risk patients developed ACLF significantly more often (0.18 vs. 0.08; p = 0.008). Uni- and multivariable competing risk regression analyses confirmed that high-risk FIPS independently predicted further decompensation (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.974; 95% CI 1.531-2.544; p <0.001) and ACLF (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.586; 95% CI 1.449-4.616; p = 0.001) after TIPS. Importantly, further decompensation and ACLF after TIPS were associated with significantly reduced transplant-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reveals that the FIPS predicts development of further decompensation and ACLF after TIPS implantation. These events are responsible for impaired transplant-free survival in FIPS high-risk patients. These results pave the way for the development of tailored clinical management strategies.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Prognostication after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation is challenging. Several clinical scores have been proposed in this context, such as the Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS). The FIPS can identify a high-risk group of patients with significantly reduced survival after TIPS. However, to understand the reasons for these patients' unfavorable outcome, their clinical course after TIPS needs to be characterized. This study reveals that the FIPS predicts development of further decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure after TIPS implantation, which are responsible for the poor prognosis of FIPS high-risk patients. Therefore, the present results may be useful for tailored decision making in patients allocated to TIPS implantation.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with refractory ascites treated with either TIPS, tunneled peritoneal catheter, or ascites pump

BACKGROUND

Refractory ascites (RA) remains a serious complication in patients with cirrhosis. Currently, the insertion of a TIPS is considered the standard of care in these patients. To achieve symptom control in those with TIPS contraindications, tunneled peritoneal catheters (PeCa) or ascites pumps were introduced. However, data comparing the available treatment options are scarce. This study aims to compare outcomes among patients with RA treated either with TIPS, PeCa, or ascites pump.

METHODS

All patients with RA and cirrhosis treated at Hannover Medical School between 2009 and 2023 were evaluated. Endpoints included mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), hyponatremia, peritonitis, and rehospitalization rate. Propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for group differences.

RESULTS

First, 31 patients with ascites pump were compared to 62 patients with a PeCa after propensity score matching. There were no differences regarding mortality nor incidences of AKI, hyponatremia, or rehospitalization. However, incidences of peritonitis and explantation were lower in those with ascites pump (HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.15-0.70, and HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.71, respectively). Second, 35 ascites pump patients were matched with 70 individuals with TIPS. No differences regarding mortality or peritonitis incidence were observed. Ascites pump patients showed higher incidences of AKI (HR 4.55, 95% CI: 2.53-8.18) and hyponatremia (HR 4.13, 95% CI: 2.08-8.22). Last, 129 patients with TIPS were compared to 129 with PeCa. Mortality was comparable, while incidences of AKI (HR 5.01, 95% CI: 3.36-7.47), hyponatremia (HR 4.64, 95% CI: 3.03-7.12), and peritonitis (HR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.41-3.41) were higher in those with PeCa.

CONCLUSIONS

While ascites pump was associated with lower incidences of device infections and explantations, TIPS was associated with the lowest incidence of clinical complications in patients with RA.

Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for long-term adverse outcomes in cirrhosis patients post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may predict outcomes in end-stage liver disease, but its value after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is unclear. This study explored the link between NLR and long-term outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis patients post-TIPS. We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated between January 2016 and December 2021, noting demographic data, lab results, and follow-up outcomes, including liver transplantation or death. Cox regression, adjusted for various factors, showed that NLR is an independent predictor of post-TIPS progression (HR 1.665; 95% CI 1.149-2.414; P = 0.007). Patients were divided into tertiles based on NLR. The medium tertile had a 3.51-fold increased risk of progression compared to the lowest (HR 3.510; 95% CI 1.104-11.153, P = 0.033), and the highest tertile had a 5.112-fold increase (HR 5.112; 95% CI 1.653-15.806, P = 0.005). This suggests that NLR is a valuable prognostic marker for long-term progression in these patients, highlighting the role of systemic inflammation.

Identification of optimal portal pressure decrease to control ascites while minimizing HE after TIPS: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis can lead to refractory ascites. A TIPS treats clinically significant portal hypertension but may cause overt hepatic encephalopathy (oHE). Our aim was to determine the optimal reduction of the portal pressure gradient (PPG) through TIPS to control ascites without raising oHE risk.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This multicenter study screened 1509 patients from 3 European centers (Hannover, Vienna, and Hamburg) undergoing TIPS implantation between 2000 and 2023. Patients with TIPS indications other than refractory ascites/hepatic hydrothorax, vascular liver disease, HCC, or insufficient PPG data were excluded. PPG was measured before and after TIPS insertion. Outcome data were assessed up to 1 year after TIPS insertion. Analyses were conducted utilizing a modern machine learning model, namely a competing-risk random survival forest, partial dependence plots, and competing risk analyses with liver transplantation/death as competitors. The cohort was divided into a 60% derivation and 40% validation cohort. Overall, 729 patients (median MELD: 13 [IQR 10-16], 66% male, 23% oHE before TIPS) were analyzed. The derivation cohort comprised 438 patients, and the validation cohort comprised 291 patients. The optimal PPG reduction, determined by maximally selected Gray statistic and PDP of the random survival forest, was 60%-80%. In this range, patients showed significantly fewer hepatic decompensations due to ascites (HDA) (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.7 [0.52-0.96]) with similar oHE incidences (sHR: 0.92 [0.67-1.27]). The PPG range was confirmed in the validation cohort (HDA: sHR: 0.66 [0.46-0.96]; oHE: sHR: 0.89 [0.61-1.32]).

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted PPG reduction of 60%-80% showed significantly reduced HDA without increased oHE risk. Therefore, PPG reduction within this range could be a valid reduction target.

Development and validation of a machine learning-based model to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND

Although numerous prognostic scores have been developed for patients with cirrhosis after Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement over years, an accurate machine learning (ML)-based model remains unavailable. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a ML-based prognostic model to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis after TIPS placement.

METHODS

In this retrospective study in China, patients diagnosed with cirrhosis after TIPS placement from 2014 to 2020 in our cohort were included to develop a ML-based model. Patients from the other two tertiary hospitals between 2016 and 2022 were as external validation cohort. The random forest (RF) model was built using 7 selected features via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and subsequent 10-fold cross-validation was performed.

FINDINGS

A total of 400 patients in our cohort were included (median age and interquartile range, 59 (50, 66); 240 men). Two hundred and eighty patients made up the training set and 120 were in the testing set, and 346 patients were included in the external validation cohort. Seven attributes were selected: Na, ammonia (Amm), total bilirubin (Tb), albumin (Alb), age, creatinine (Cr), and ascites. These parameters were included in a new score named the RF model. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 Score of the RF model were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.91), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.91), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.00), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.10) in the testing set, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.91), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.92), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.00), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97) in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve showed a slope of 0.875 in the testing set and a slope of 0.778 in the external validation cohort, suggesting well calibration performance. The RF model outperformed other scoring systems, such as the (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score) CTP, (model for end-stage liver disease) MELD, (sodium MELD) MELD-Na, (Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival) FIPS and (Albumin-Bilirubin) ALBI, showing the highest (area under the curve) AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91) and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.79) in predicting 1-year survival across the testing set and external validation cohort.

INTERPRETATION

This study developed a RF model that better predicted 1-year survival for patients with cirrhosis after TIPS placement than the other scores.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81900552 and 82370628).

Improving Clinical Decisions in IR: Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Predicting Ascites Improvement after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of interpretable machine learning (ML) models to predict ascites improvement in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for refractory ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 218 patients with refractory ascites who underwent TIPS placement were analyzed. Data on 29 demographic, clinical, and procedural features were collected. Ascites improvement was defined as reduction in the need of paracentesis by 50% or more at the 1-month follow-up. Univariate statistical analysis was performed. Data were split into train and test sets. Feature selection was performed using a wrapper-based sequential feature selection algorithm. Two ML models were built using support vector machine (SVM) and CatBoost algorithms. Shapley additive explanations values were calculated to assess interpretability of ML models. Performance metrics were calculated using the test set.

RESULTS

Refractory ascites improved in 168 (77%) patients. Higher sodium (Na; 136 mEq/L vs 134 mEq/L; P = .001) and albumin (2.91 g/dL vs 2.68 g/dL; P = .03) levels, lower creatinine levels (1.01 mg/dL vs 1.17 mg/dL; P = .04), and lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) (13 vs 15; P = .01) and MELD-Na (15 vs 17.5, P = .002) scores were associated with significant improvement, whereas main portal vein puncture was associated with a lower improvement rate (P = .02). SVM and CatBoost models had accuracy ratios of 83% and 87%, with area under the curve values of 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between performances of the models in DeLong test (P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

ML models may have potential in patient selection for TIPS placement by predicting the improvement in refractory ascites.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the patients on the liver transplant list

Patients with cirrhosis-associated and portal hypertension-associated complications may benefit from TIPS and/or liver transplantation. In many patients, the decision of whether or not TIPS should be placed prior to liver transplantation is fairly clear-cut. Nevertheless, there are some patients in whom the decision can be more complex. On one hand, TIPS is easily available in contrast to liver transplantation, and patients with TIPS may have clinical improvement. On the other hand, although TIPS may improve the situation of the patient, this improvement may not be sufficient to significantly improve the quality of life. Furthermore, TIPS malposition may be challenging for liver transplantation surgery. This review approaches the advantages and disadvantages of TIPS placement in patients who are candidates for liver transplantation and proposes decision pathways for patients with complications of portal hypertension on the liver transplant waiting list.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Centre for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of CSPH and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Center for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of clinically significant portal hypertension and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

The Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival accurately predicts mortality in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

The recently developed Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS) allows improved risk classification of patients with decompensated cirrhosis allocated to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation. This study investigated the prognostic value of the FIPS in patients hospitalized with acute decompensation of cirrhosis (AD), outside the setting of TIPS implantation.

METHODS

A total of 1133 patients with AD were included in a retrospective, multi-centre study. Ninety-day, 180-day and 1-year mortality were recorded and the FIPS' performance in predicting mortality at these time points was analysed using ROC analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety-day, 180-day and 1-year mortality were 17.7%, 24.4% and 30.8%. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression models showed that the FIPS independently predicted 1-year mortality in the study cohort (HR 1.806, 95% CI 1.632-1.998, p < .0001). In ROC analyses, the FIPS offered consistently high performance in the prediction of mortality within 1 year after AD (area under the receiver operator characteristic [AUROC]: 1-year mortality .712 [.679-.746], 180-day mortality .740 [.705-.775] and 90-day mortality .761 [.721-.801]). In fact, in the subgroup of patients presenting with variceal bleeding, the FIPS even showed significantly improved discriminatory performance in the prediction of long-term mortality (AUROC 1-year mortality: .782 [.724-.839]) in comparison with established prognostic scores, such as the CLIF-C AD score (.724 [.660-.788], p = .0071) or MELD 3.0 (.726 [.662-.790], p = .0042).

CONCLUSIONS

The FIPS accurately predicts mortality in patients with AD and seems to offer superior prognostication of long-term mortality in patients with variceal bleeding.

Hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS: Current status and prospects in predictive assessment

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an essential procedure for the treatment of portal hypertension but can result in hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a serious complication that worsens patient outcomes. Investigating predictors of HE after TIPS is essential to improve prognosis. This review analyzes risk factors and compares predictive models, weighing traditional scores such as Child-Pugh, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) against emerging artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. While traditional scores provide initial insights into HE risk, they have limitations in dealing with clinical complexity. Advances in machine learning (ML), particularly when integrated with imaging and clinical data, offer refined assessments. These innovations suggest the potential for AI to significantly improve the prediction of post-TIPS HE. The study provides clinicians with a comprehensive overview of current prediction methods, while advocating for the integration of AI to increase the accuracy of post-TIPS HE assessments. By harnessing the power of AI, clinicians can better manage the risks associated with TIPS and tailor interventions to individual patient needs. Future research should therefore prioritize the development of advanced AI frameworks that can assimilate diverse data streams to support clinical decision-making. The goal is not only to more accurately predict HE, but also to improve overall patient care and quality of life.

Reduced bone mineral density is associated to post-TIPS survival of female patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is common in patients with cirrhosis, eventually leading to sarcopenia and loss of bone mass.

AIMS

The aims of this study was the assessment of body composition (BC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and the prognostic impact on survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation.

METHODS

BMD and BC of 107 patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS implantation were prospectively analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The prevalence and predisposing risk factors for reduced BMD and sarcopenia were assessed. Impact on 12-month survival after TIPS implantation was evaluated.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 48.6 % of the patients with a predominance of male patients (58.7% vs. 25.0 %, p = 0.001). 67.2 % had reduced BMD. Low BMI was independently associated with sarcopenia (OR 0.751 (95 % CI: 0.662;0.852), p < 0.001) and reduced BMD (OR 0.851 (0.773;0.937), p = 0.001). Patients with reduced BMD, but not sarcopenia, had impaired 12-month survival after TIPS-implantation (61.2% vs. 82.9 %, p = 0.030). Subgroup analysis showed that this was especially valid for female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia and reduced BMD are frequently observed in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Reduced BMD negatively affects post-TIPS survival. Since malnutrition is a leading cause, assessment of nutritional status and specific treatment should be included in clinical practice.

Cytokine adsorption in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (CYTOHEP): A single center, open-label, three-arm, randomized, controlled intervention pilot trial

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of bilirubin reduction by hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-center, open-label, controlled pilot trial. Patients with ACLF, acute kidney injury, and serum bilirubin ≥5 mg/dL were assigned 1:1:1 to one of three study groups (CRRT with or without hemoadsorption, no CRRT). In the hemoadsorption group, the CytoSorb adsorber was incorporated into the CRRT system, replaced after 12, 24, and 48 h, and removed after 72 h. The primary endpoint was the serum bilirubin level after 72 h.

RESULTS

CYTOHEP was terminated early due to difficulties in recruiting patients and ethical concerns. Three of 9 patients (33%) were treated in each group. Comparing the three groups, mean bilirubin levels after 72 h were lower by -8.0 mg/dL in the "CRRT with hemoadsorption" group compared to "CRRT without hemoadsorption" (95% CI, -21.3 to 5.3 mg/dL; p = 0.17). The corresponding mean difference between "CRRT without hemoadsorption" and "no CRRT" was -1.4 mg/dL (95% CI, -14.2 to 11.5 mg/dL; p = 0.78). Comparing "CRRT with hemoadsorption" and "no CRRT," it was -9.4 mg/dL (95% CI, -20.8 to 2.1 mg/dL; p = 0.0854). Only 1/9 patients (11%, "no CRRT" group) survived day 30 after study inclusion but died on day 89. IL-6, liver function parameters, and clinical scores were similar between the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CYTOHEP failed to demonstrate that extracorporeal hemoadsorption combined with CRRT can reduce serum bilirubin in ACLF patients with acute kidney failure.

No value of non-selective beta-blockers after TIPS-insertion

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) are a well-established treatment in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. However, their potential role after insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) still needs to be determined. Of note, recent studies suggested that favourable anti-inflammatory effects of NSBB might be independent from pressure reduction. This study aimed to evaluate whether NSBB-treatment is associated with amelioration of systemic inflammation (SI), hepatic decompensation and survival after TIPS-insertion.

METHODS

In a retrospective study comprising 305 consecutive patients, we investigated the impact of NSBB-intake at TIPS-placement on periinterventional cirrhosis-associated complications and continued NSBB-treatment after discharge on complications including hepatic decompensation and mortality during 1-year follow-up, employing multivariable competing-risk-analyses. In a prospective cohort including 45 patients, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI analysing 48 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs) at baseline plus 3 and 6 months after TIPS-insertion.

RESULTS

Overall, 175 (57.4%) patients received NSBB-therapy prior to TIPS-insertion; upon discharge, this decreased to 131 (22.9%), with 36 (27.5%) discontinuing NSBB within 1-year follow-up. Neither NSBB-therapy at TIPS-insertion nor treatment-continuation after discharge were associated with lower risks for hepatic decompensation, individual cirrhosis-associated complications or mortality neither in the periinterventional period nor during follow-up. Similarly, in the prospective cohort NSBB-intake was not linked to lower levels or a more prominent change of WBC, CRP or any other SIM at any of the investigated time points.

CONCLUSION

NSBB-therapy at the time of TIPS-insertion and its (dis-)continuation afterwards seems to have no significant impact on SI, development of hepatic decompensation and survival.

French guidelines on TIPS: Indications and modalities

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become essential in the treatment or prevention of portal hypertension-related complications. In the early 1990s, the primary indication was refractory bleeding. It is now proposed for the treatment of ascites for the prevention of bleeding and in patients with vascular diseases of the liver. Thus, there are a growing number of patients being treated with TIPS all over the world. The broadening of indications, the involvement of multiple stakeholders, the need for an accurate selection, the positioning in relation to transplantation and the lack of standardization in pre-therapeutic assessment, in the procedure itself and in the follow-up have led the board of the French Association for the Study of the Liver to establish recommendations.

Predictive Accuracy Comparison of Prognostic Scoring Systems for Survival in Patients Undergoing TIPS Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of different risk assessment models (RAMs) for survival after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, WOS, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI from inception to February 2023 was conducted. We comprehensively reviewed and aggregated data from numerous studies covering prevalent RAMs such as Child-Turcotte-Pugh, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Sodium (MELD-Na), the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS), Bilirubin-platelet, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation score, and Albumin-Bilirubin grade across different timeframes. For this study, short-term is defined as outcomes within a year while long-term refers to outcomes beyond one year. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve or Concordance Statistics was chosen as the metric to assess predictive capacity for mortality outcomes across six predetermined time intervals. Mean effect sizes at various time points were determined using robust variance estimation.

RESULTS

MELD consistently stood out as a primary short-term survival predictor, particularly for 1 month (± 2 weeks) (AUC: 0.72) and 3 months of (± 1 month) survival (AUC: 0.72). MELD-Na showed the best long-term predictive ability, with an AUC of 0.70 at 3.5 years (± 1.5 years). FIPS performed well for 6 months of (± 2 months) survival (AUC: 0.68) and overall transplant-free survival (AUC: 0.75). Efficacy nuances were observed in RAMs when applied to particular subgroups. Meta-regression emphasized the potential predictor overlaps in models like MELD and FIPS.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis underscores the MELD score as the premier predictor for short-term survival following TIPS. Meanwhile, the FIPS score and MELD-Na model exhibit potential in forecasting long-term outcomes. The study accentuates the significance of RAM selection for enhancing patient outcomes and advocates for additional research to corroborate these findings and fine-tune risk assessment in TIPS.

Combination of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Sarcopenia predicts mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

TIPS is the most effective treatment for portal hypertension. Patient selection remains important to achieving optimal post-TIPS outcomes. The study evaluates 1-year mortality factors in cirrhotic patients receiving TIPS.

METHODS

87 cirrhotic patients received a TIPS between 2015 - 2021. Predictors of 1-year and overall mortality were assessed by estimating cumulative incidence functions and Grey's test to adjust for liver transplantation as a risk competing with mortality. Variables with p < 0.05 were checked for collinearity and included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Model discrimination was evaluated by calculating the area under the ROC curve.

RESULTS

87 patients were included (68% men; 22% ≥70 years). ALD was the primary cirrhosis cause. Most patients were Child-Pugh class B, MELD-Na score was 13.6 ± 6.0 points. The most frequent indication for TIPS was bleeding (51.7%), followed by refractory ascites (42.5%). The variables positively associated with mortality in univariate analysis were ascites, clinically overt sarcopenia and MELD-Na score, while ongoing nutritional supplementation improved survival. In the multivariate analysis, only clinically overt sarcopenia and MELD-Na score remained independently associated with mortality. A MELD-Na/sarcopenia model demonstrated a good discrimination, AUROC: 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 - 0.95).

CONCLUSION

MELD-Na score, and sarcopenia were significantly associated with 1-year survival in cirrhotic patients who received TIPS.

Shunt dysfunction and mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a catheter-based, minimally invasive procedure to reduce portal hypertension. The aim of the study was to investigate dysfunction and mortality after TIPS and to identify factors associated with these events.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 834 patients undergoing TIPS implantation in a single center from 1993-2018 was performed. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated, and frailty models were used to assess associations between potentially influential variables and time to dysfunction or death.

RESULTS

1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rates were 20.9% (confidence interval (CI) 17.7-24.1), 22.5% (CI 19.1-25.8), and 25.0% (CI: 21.1-28.8), 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year dysfunction rates were 28.4% (CI 24.6-32.3), 38.9% (CI 34.5-43.3), and 52.4% (CI 47.2-57.6). The use of covered stents is a protective factor regarding TIPS dysfunction (hazard ratio (HR) 0.47, CI 0.33-0.68) but does not play a major role in survival (HR 0.95, CI 0.58-1.56). Risk factors for mortality are rather TIPS in an emergency setting (HR 2.78, CI 1.19-6.50), a previous TIPS dysfunction (HR 2.43, CI 1.28-4.62), and an increased Freiburg score (HR 1.45, CI 0.93-2.28).

CONCLUSION

The use of covered stents is an important protective factor regarding TIPS dysfunction. Whereas previous TIPS dysfunction, emergency TIPS implantation, and an elevated Freiburg score are associated with increased mortality. Awareness of risk factors could contribute to a better selection of patients who may benefit from a TIPS procedure and improve clinical follow-up with regard to early detection of thrombosis/stenosis.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The use of covered stents reduces the risk of dysfunction after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). TIPS dysfunction, emergency TIPS placement, and a high Freiburg score are linked to higher mortality rates in TIPS patients.

KEY POINTS

The risk of dysfunction is higher for uncovered stents compared to covered stents. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction increases the risk of instantaneous death after the intervention. A higher Freiburg score increases the rate of death after the intervention. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantations in emergency settings reduce survival rates.

The Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Mortality After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement

Background and Aims

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on the survival of cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

Methods

A total of 293 patients treated with TIPS were included. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was used to calculate the optimal cut-off values of parameters such as NLR. The Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional risk model were used to evaluate the effects of NLR and other variables on 2-year all-cause mortality.

Results

The area under the ROC for NLR was 0.634, with an optimal cutoff value of 4.9. Two-year mortality rates for patients with high (≥4.9) and low (<4.9) NLR were 22.1% and 9.3%, respectively (Log rank test: P = 0.002). After correcting for confounders, multivariate analysis demonstrated that NLR ≥ 4.9 (HR = 2.741, 95% CI 1.467-5.121, P = 0.002), age ≥ 63 (HR = 3.403, 95% CI 1.835-6.310, P < 0.001), and gender (male) (HR = 2.842, 95% CI 1.366-5.912, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for the mortality outcome. Considering the stratification of early and selective TIPS treatment, high NLR still significantly increased the risk of mortality for patients (Log rank test: P = 0.007, HR = 2.317, 95% CI 1.232-4.356).

Conclusion

NLR can help to predict survival in EGVB patients after TIPS, and the type of TIPS should also be considered in practical applications.

External validation of the modified CTP score based on ammonia to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis after TIPS placement

This study aimed to perform the first external validation of the modified Child-Turcotte-Pugh score based on plasma ammonia (aCTP) and compare it with other risk scoring systems to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. We retrospectively reviewed 473 patients from three cohorts between January 2016 and June 2022 and compared the aCTP score with the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and sodium MELD (MELD-Na) in predicting transplant-free survival by the concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve. The median follow-up time was 29 months, during which a total of 62 (20.74%) patients died or underwent liver transplantation. The survival curves for the three aCTP grades differed significantly. Patients with aCTP grade C had a shorter expected lifespan than patients with aCTP grades A and B (P < 0.0001). The aCTP score showed the best discriminative performance using the C-index compared with other scores at each time point during follow-up, it also showed better calibration in the calibration plot and the lowest Brier scores, and it also showed a higher net benefit than the other scores in the DCA curve. The aCTP score outperformed the other risk scores in predicting survival after TIPS placement in patients with cirrhosis and may be useful for risk stratification and survival prediction.

Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Better understanding of disease pathophysiology has led to advances in managing ascites and its associated complications including hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney Injury (HRS-AKI), especially medicinal and interventional advances.

AIM

To review the latest changes in the management of ascites and HRS-AKI.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, using the keywords cirrhosis, ascites, renal dysfunction, acute kidney injury, hepatorenal syndrome, beta-blockers, albumin, TIPS and vasoconstrictors, including only publications in English.

RESULTS

The medicinal advances include earlier treatment of clinically significant portal hypertension to delay the onset of ascites and the use of human albumin solution to attenuate systemic inflammation thus improving the haemodynamic changes associated with cirrhosis. Furthermore, new classes of drugs such as sodium glucose co-transporter 2 are being investigated for use in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. For HRS-AKI management, newer pharmacological agents such as vasopressin partial agonists and relaxin are being studied. Interventional advances include the refinement of TIPS technique and patient selection to improve outcomes in patients with refractory ascites. The development of the alfa pump system and the study of outcomes associated with the use of long-term palliative abdominal drain will also serve to improve the quality of life in patients with refractory ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

New treatment strategies emerged from better understanding of the pathophysiology of ascites and HRS-AKI have shown improved prognosis in these patients. The future will see many of these approaches confirmed in large multi-centre clinical trials with the aim to benefit the patients with ascites and HRS-AKI.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels predict survival in patients with portal hypertension undergoing TIPS

Background & Aims

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the most effective therapy for complications of portal hypertension. However, clinical outcomes following TIPS placement vary widely between patients and identifying ideal candidates remains a challenge. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a circulating marker of immune activation that has previously been associated with liver inflammation, but its prognostic value in patients receiving TIPS is unknown. In the present study, we evaluated the potential clinical relevance of suPAR levels in patients undergoing TIPS insertion.

Methods

suPAR concentrations were measured by ELISA in hepatic vein (HV) and portal vein (PV) blood samples from 99 patients (training cohort) as well as peripheral venous blood samples from an additional 150 patients (validation cohort) undergoing TIPS placement. The association between suPAR levels and patient outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox-regression analyses.

Results

suPAR concentrations were significantly higher in HV samples compared to PV samples and correlated with PV concentration, the presence of ascites, renal injury, and consequently with the Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Patients with lower suPAR levels had significantly better short- and long-term survival after TIPS insertion, which remained robust after adjustment for confounders in multivariate Cox-regression analyses. Sensitivity analysis showed an improvement in risk prediction in patients stratified by Child-Pugh or MELD scores. In an independent validation cohort, higher levels of suPAR predicted poor transplant-free survival after TIPS, particularly in patients with Child-Pugh A/B cirrhosis.

Conclusion

suPAR is largely derived from the injured liver and its levels are predictive of outcome in patients undergoing TIPS. suPAR, as a surrogate of hepatic inflammation, may be used to stratify care in patients following TIPS insertion.

Impact and implications

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the most effective therapy for complications of portal hypertension. However, clinical outcomes following TIPS placement vary widely between patients and identification of the ideal candidates remains challenging. We show that soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a circulating marker of immune activation that can easily be measured in routine clinical practice, is a novel marker to identify patients who will benefit from TIPS and those who will not.

Episodic overt hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt does not increase mortality in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) is a major complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement, given its high incidence and possibility of refractoriness to medical treatment. Nevertheless, the impact of post-TIPS OHE on mortality has not been investigated in a large population.

METHODS

We designed a multicenter, non-inferiority, observational study to evaluate the mortality rate at 30 months in patients with and without OHE after TIPS. We analyzed a database of 614 patients who underwent TIPS in three Italian centers and estimated the cumulative incidence of OHE and mortality with competitive risk analyses, setting the non-inferiority limit at 0.12.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 30 months (IQR 12-30), 293 patients developed at least one episode of OHE. Twenty-seven (9.2%) of them experienced recurrent/persistent OHE. Patients with OHE were older (64 [57-71] vs. 59 [50-67] years, p <0.001), had lower albumin (3.1 [2.8-3.5] vs. 3.25 [2.9-3.6] g/dl, p = 0.023), and had a higher prevalence of pre-TIPS OHE (15.4% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.023). Child-Pugh and MELD scores were similar. The 30-month difference in mortality between patients with and without post-TIPS OHE was 0.03 (95% CI -0.042 to 0.102). Multivariable analysis showed that age (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05, p <0.001) and MELD score (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13, p <0.001), but not post-TIPS OHE, were associated with a higher mortality rate. Similar results were obtained when patients undergoing TIPS for variceal re-bleeding prophylaxis (n = 356) or refractory ascites (n = 258) were analyzed separately. The proportion of patients with persistent OHE after TIPS was significantly higher in the group of patients who died. The robustness of these results was increased following propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

Episodic OHE after TIPS is not associated with mortality in patients undergoing TIPS, regardless of the indication.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) is a common complication in patients with advanced liver disease and it is particularly frequent following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. In patients with cirrhosis outside the setting of TIPS, the development of OHE negatively impacts survival, regardless of the severity of cirrhosis or the presence of acute-on-chronic liver failure. In this multicenter, non-inferiority, observational study we demonstrated that post-TIPS OHE does not increase the risk of mortality in patients undergoing TIPS, irrespective of the indication. This finding alleviates concerns regarding the weight of this complication after TIPS. Intensive research to improve patient selection and risk stratification remains crucial to enhance the quality of life of patients and caregivers and to avoid undermining the positive effects of TIPS on survival.

Attitudes towards transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in Australia: a national survey of TIPS centres

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a minimally invasive therapeutic option to treat the sequelae of portal hypertension. It is unclear whether current international recommendations are reflected in current clinical practice across Australia and the extent of variations in care. This study aimed to address this gap in knowledge and benchmark the current landscape of TIPS services in Australia against international guidelines.

METHODS

We designed a 42-item questionnaire according to practice-based recommendations and standards of international guidelines to investigate current landscape of TIPS service across four key domains: (1) service provision, (2) patient selection and indications, (3) best procedure practice, and (4) postoperative care.

RESULTS

Gastroenterologist/hepatologists from 23 major liver centres (67.6%) across Australia currently performing TIPS completed the questionnaire. Between 2017 and 2020, there were 456 elective TIPS insertions. Units offering TIPS service had a low median number of TIPS insertions (n=7 per annum). More than half of respondents (56.5%) did not have institutional clinical practice protocols. There was marked variation in practices across institutions in terms of TIPS indications and patient selection. Despite variations, the success rate of elective TIPS was high at 91.7% (79-100%), with 86.6% (29-100%) for rescue TIPS. There was significant variation in postoperative follow-up and care.

CONCLUSION

Current TIPS practice in Australia varies significantly across institutions. There is a need for a national consensus clinical practice guidelines to improve access and minimise unwarranted variation. A national registry for TIPS could measure, monitor, and report on quality of clinical care and patient outcomes.

Recent developments in the management of ascites in cirrhosis

In recent years, advances have been made for treating ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Recent studies have indicated that several treatments that have been used for a long time in the management of portal hypertension may have beneficial effects that were not previously identified. Long-term albumin infusion may improve survival in patients with cirrhosis and ascites while beta-blockers may reduce ascites occurrence. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) placement may also improve survival in selected patients in addition to the control with ascites. Low-flow ascites pump insertion can be another option for some patients with intractable ascites. In this review, we summarize the latest data related to the management of ascites occurring in cirrhosis. There are still unanswered questions, such as the optimal use of albumin as a long-term therapy, the place of beta-blockers, and the best timing for TIPS placement to improve the natural history of ascites, as well as the optimal stent diameter to reduce the risk of shunt-related side-effects. These issued should be addressed in future studies.

Development of a new Cox model for predicting long-term survival in hepatitis cirrhosis patients underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is a procedure that can effectively treat complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. However, there have been no specific studies on predicting long-term survival after TIPS placement.

AIM

To establish a model to predict long-term survival in patients with hepatitis cirrhosis after TIPS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 224 patients who underwent TIPS implantation. Through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, various factors were examined for their ability to predict survival at 6 years after TIPS. Consequently, a composite score was formulated, encompassing the indication, shunt reasonability, portal venous pressure gradient (PPG) after TIPS, percentage decrease in portal venous pressure (PVP), indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) and total bilirubin (Tbil) level. Furthermore, the performance of the newly developed Cox (NDC) model was evaluated in an internal validation cohort and compared with that of a series of existing models.

RESULTS

The indication (variceal bleeding or ascites), shunt reasonability (reasonable or unreasonable), ICGR15, postoperative PPG, percentage of PVP decrease and Tbil were found to be independent factors affecting long-term survival after TIPS placement. The NDC model incorporated these parameters and successfully identified patients at high risk, exhibiting a notably elevated mortality rate following the TIPS procedure, as observed in both the training and validation cohorts. Additionally, in terms of predicting the long-term survival rate, the performance of the NDC model was significantly better than that of the other four models [Child-Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), MELD-sodium and the Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival].

CONCLUSION

The NDC model can accurately predict long-term survival after the TIPS procedure in patients with hepatitis cirrhosis, help identify high-risk patients and guide follow-up management after TIPS implantation.

The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Management of Ascites in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

The development and progression of ascites represent a crucial event in the natural history of patients with cirrhosis, predisposing them to other complications and carrying a heavy impact on prognosis. The current standard of care for the management of ascites relies on various combinations of diuretics and large-volume paracenteses. Periodic long-term albumin infusions on top of diuretics have been recently shown to greatly facilitate the management of ascites. The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), an artificial connection between the portal and caval systems, is indicated to treat patients with refractory ascites. TIPS acts to decrease portal hypertension, thus targeting an upstream event in the pathophysiological cascade of cirrhosis decompensation. Available evidence shows a significant benefit on ascites control/resolution, with less clear results on patient survival. Patient selection plays a crucial role in obtaining better clinical responses and avoiding TIPS-related adverse events, the most important of which are hepatic encephalopathy, cardiac overload and failure, and liver failure. At the same time, some recent technical evolutions of available stents appear promising but deserve further investigations. Future challenges and perspectives include (i) identifying the features for selecting the ideal candidate to TIPS; (ii) recognizing the better timing for TIPS placement; and (iii) understanding the most appropriate role of TIPS within the framework of all other available treatments for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

The time window for pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt could be extended to 5 days

As recommended by Baveno VII consensus, the utilization of pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (pTIPS) has been considered as standard therapeutic approach for the management of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) associated with cirrhosis., but the 72-h window for pTIPS is too narrow. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients who received <72 h pTIPS and 72 h-5d pTIPS. In this study, a total of 63 cirrhotic patients with AVB who underwent pTIPS between October 2016 and December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into <72 h group (n = 32) and 72 h-5d group (n = 31), based on the timing of the intervention. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of death (22.3% ± 7.4% vs. 19.9% ± 7.3%, log-rank P = 0.849), variceal rebleeding (9.7% ± 5.3% vs. 17.8% ± 7.3%, log-rank P = 0.406), OHE (28.5% ± 8.0% vs. 23.9% ± 8.0%, log-rank P = 0.641) and shunt dysfunction (8.6% ± 6.0% vs. 17.4% ± 8.1%, log-rank P = 0.328) between <72 h and 72 h-5d groups. In the total cohort, sarcopenia was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality (HR = 11.268, 95% CI = 1.435-88.462, P = 0.021) and OHE(HR = 12.504, 95% CI = 1.598-97.814, P = 0.016). In conclusion, the clinical outcomes of cirrhotic patients with AVB who underwent pTIPS within the 72-h to 5-day window were found to be comparable to those treated within the 72-h window.

A modified model for predicting mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: A multicentre study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has controversial survival benefits; thus, patient screening should be performed preoperatively. In this study, we aimed to develop a model to predict post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt mortality to aid clinical decision making.

METHODS

A total of 811 patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt from five hospitals were divided into the training and external validation data sets. A modified prediction model of post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt mortality (ModelMT ) was built after performing logistic regression. To verify the improved performance of ModelMT , we compared it with seven previous models, both in discrimination and calibration. Furthermore, patients were stratified into low-, medium-, high- and extremely high-risk subgroups.

RESULTS

ModelMT demonstrated a satisfying predictive efficiency in both discrimination and calibration, with an area under the curve of .875 in the training set and .852 in the validation set. Compared to previous models (ALBI, BILI-PLT, MELD-Na, MOTS, FIPS, MELD, CLIF-C AD), ModelMT showed superior performance in discrimination by statistical difference in the Delong test, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement (all p < .050). Similar results were observed in calibration. Low-, medium-, high- and extremely high-risk groups were defined by scores of ≤160, 160-180, 180-200 and >200, respectively. To facilitate future clinical application, we also built an applet for ModelMT .

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a predictive model with improved performance to assist in decision making for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt according to survival benefits.

MELD 3.0 in Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

The MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) 3.0 score was developed to replace the MELD-Na score that is currently used to prioritize liver allocation for cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. The MELD 3.0 calculator includes new inputs from patient sex and serum albumin levels and has new weights for serum sodium, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and creatinine levels. It is expected that use of MELD 3.0 scores will reduce overall waitlist mortality modestly and improve access for female liver transplant candidates. The utility of MELD 3.0 and PELDcre (pediatric end-stage liver disease, creatinine) scores for risk stratification in cirrhotic patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and other interventions requires further study. This article reviews the background of the MELD score and the rationale to create MELD 3.0 as well as potential implications of using this newer risk stratification tool in clinical practice.

Predicting survival in patients with 'non-high-risk' acute variceal bleeding receiving β-blockers+ligation to prevent re-bleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the treatment of choice for high-risk acute variceal bleeding (AVB; i.e., Child-Turcotte-Pugh [CTP] B8-9+active bleeding/C10-13). Nevertheless, some 'non-high-risk' patients have poor outcomes despite the combination of non-selective beta-blockers and endoscopic variceal ligation for secondary prophylaxis. We investigated prognostic factors for re-bleeding and mortality in 'non-high-risk' AVB to identify subgroups who may benefit from more potent treatments (i.e., TIPS) to prevent further decompensation and mortality.

METHODS

A total of 2,225 adults with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding were prospectively recruited at 34 centres between 2011-2015; for the purpose of this study, case definitions and information on prognostic indicators at index AVB and on day 5 were further refined in low-risk patients, of whom 581 (without failure to control bleeding or contraindications to TIPS) who were managed by non-selective beta-blockers/endoscopic variceal ligation, were finally included. Patients were followed for 1 year.

RESULTS

Overall, 90 patients (15%) re-bled and 70 (12%) patients died during follow-up. Using clinical routine data, no meaningful predictors of re-bleeding were identified. However, re-bleeding (included as a time-dependent co-variable) increased mortality, even after accounting for differences in patient characteristics (adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio: 2.57; 95% CI 1.43-4.62; p = 0.002). A nomogram including CTP, creatinine, and sodium measured at baseline accurately (concordance: 0.752) stratified the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

The majority of 'non-high-risk' patients with AVB have an excellent prognosis, if treated according to current recommendations. However, about one-fifth of patients, i.e. those with CTP ≥8 and/or high creatinine levels or hyponatremia, have a considerable risk of death within 1 year of the index bleed. Future clinical trials should investigate whether elective TIPS placement reduces mortality in these patients.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement improves outcomes in high-risk acute variceal bleeding; nevertheless, some 'non-high-risk' patients have poor outcomes despite the combination of non-selective beta-blockers and endoscopic variceal ligation. This is the first large-scale study investigating prognostic factors for re-bleeding and mortality in 'non-high-risk' acute variceal bleeding. While no clinically meaningful predictors were identified for re-bleeding, we developed a nomogram integrating baseline Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, creatinine, and sodium to stratify mortality risk. Our study paves the way for future clinical trials evaluating whether elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement improves outcomes in presumably 'non-high-risk' patients who are identified as being at increased risk of death.

Prognostic models in end stage liver disease

Cirrhosis is a major cause of death worldwide, and is associated with significant health care costs. Even if milestones have been recently reached in understanding and managing end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the disease course remains somewhat difficult to prognosticate. These difficulties have already been acknowledged already in the past, when scores instead of single parameters have been proposed as valuable tools for short-term prognosis. These standard scores, like Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, relying on biochemical and clinical parameters, are still widely used in clinical practice to predict short- and medium-term prognosis. The MELD score, which remains an accurate, easy-to-use, objective predictive score, has received significant modifications over time, in order to improve its performance especially in the liver transplant (LT) setting, where it is widely used as prioritization tool. Although many attempts to improve prognostic accuracy have failed because of lack of replicability or poor benefit with the comparator (often the MELD score or its variants), few scores have been recently proposed and validated especially for subgroups of patients with ESLD, as those with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Artificial intelligence will probably help hepatologists in the near future to fill the current gaps in predicting disease course and long-term prognosis of such patients.

Predicting disease progression in cirrhotic patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantation: A sex-stratified analysis

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been extensively used to treat portal hypertension-associated complications, including cirrhosis. The prediction of post-TIPS prognosis is important for cirrhotic patients, as more aggressive liver transplantation is needed when the post-TIPS prognosis is poor.

AIM

To construct a nutrition-based model that could predict the disease progression of cirrhotic patients after TIPS implantation in a sex-dependent manner.

METHODS

This study retrospectively recruited cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS implantation for analysis. Muscle quality was assessed by measuring the skeletal muscle index (SMI) by computed tomography. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to determine the association between SMI and disease progression in cirrhotic patients after TIPS implantation.

RESULTS

This study eventually included 186 cirrhotic patients receiving TIPS who were followed up for 30.5 ± 18.8 mo. For male patients, the 30-mo survival rate was significantly lower and the probability of progressive events was higher (3.257-fold) in the low-level SMI group than in the high-level SMI group. According to the multivariate Cox analysis of male patients, SMI < 32.8 was an independent risk factor for long-term adverse outcomes after TIPS implantation. A model was constructed, which involved creatinine, plasma ammonia, SMI, and acute-on-chronic liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy occurring within half a year after surgery. This model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.852, sensitivity of 0.926, and specificity of 0.652. According to the results of the DeLong test, this model outperformed other models (Child-Turcotte-Pugh, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, and Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SMI is strongly associated with poor long-term outcomes in male patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS implantation.

Diastolic dysfunction is associated with cardiac decompensation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

About 20% of patients develop cardiac decompensation within the first year after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, risk factors for cardiac decompensation remain poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate predictors of cardiac decompensation after TIPS insertion in a large, well-defined cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

234 cirrhotic patients who received a TIPS at Hannover Medical School were retrospectively followed up for one year to assess the incidence of cardiac decompensation. Echocardiographic parameters and established diagnostic criteria for cardiac impairment (e.g. by the American Society of Echocardiography/ European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI)) were investigated for an association with cardiac decompensation in a competing risk analysis. Survival was analyzed using a multivariable cox regression analysis adjusting for Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival.

RESULTS

Predominant TIPS indication was ascites (83%). Median age was 59 years, median MELD-score 12% and 58% were male. Overall, 41 patients (18%) developed cardiac decompensation within one year after TIPS insertion. Diastolic dysfunction according to the ASE/EACVI was diagnosed in 26% of patients at baseline and was linked to a significantly higher risk for cardiac decompensation (p = 0.025) after TIPS. When investigating individual echocardiographic baseline parameters, only pathological E/A (<0.8 or >2) was identified as a risk factor for cardiac decompensation (p = 0.015). Mortality and liver transplantation (n = 50) were significantly higher among patients who developed cardiac decompensation (HR = 5.29, p < 0.001) as well as in patients with a pathological E/A (HR = 2.34, p = 0.006). Cardiac high-risk status (44% of patients) was strongly linked to cardiac decompensation (HR = 2.93, p = 0.002) and mortality (HR = 2.24, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac decompensation after TIPS is a frequent and important complication and is associated with reduced survival. American Society of Echocardiography/EACVI criteria and E/A seem to be the best parameters to predict the cardiac risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Devices Evolution, Technical Tips and Future Perspectives

Portal hypertension (PH) constitutes a pivotal factor in the progression of cirrhosis, giving rise to severe complications and a diminished survival rate. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has undergone significant evolution, with advancements in stent technology assuming a central role in managing PH-related complications. This review aims to outline the progression of TIPS and emphasizes the significant influence of stent advancement on its effectiveness. Initially, the use of bare metal stents (BMSs) was limited due to frequent dysfunction. However, the advent of expanding polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (ePTFE-SGs) heralded a transformative era, greatly enhancing patency rates. Further innovation culminated in the creation of ePTFE-SGs with controlled expansion, enabling precise adjustment of TIPS diameters. Comparative analyses demonstrated the superiority of ePTFE-SGs over BMSs, resulting in improved patency, fewer complications, and higher survival rates. Additional technical findings highlight the importance of central stent placement and adequate stent length, as well as the use of smaller calibers to reduce the risk of shunt-related complications. However, improving TIPS through technical means alone is inadequate for optimizing patient outcomes. An extensive understanding of hemodynamic, cardiac, and systemic factors is required to predict outcomes and tailor a personalized approach. Looking forward, the ongoing progress in SG technology, paired with the control of clinical factors that can impact outcomes, holds the promise of reshaping the management of PH-related complications in cirrhosis.

Increase of radiologically determined muscle area in patients with liver cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Sarcopenia is common in patients with liver cirrhosis and related to higher mortality. Implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a feasible method for reducing cirrhosis-related portal hypertension, but also possible improvement of the patient`s muscle status. We aimed to analyze changes in muscle quantity and prevalence of sarcopenia after TIPS. We retrospectively surveyed the muscle status in 52 patients (mean age 54.2 years) before and after TIPS by evaluating skeletal (SMI) and psoas muscle indices (PMI) in CT and MR images. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS), and their underlying laboratory parameters (e.g., Albumin) were analyzed. Prevalence of sarcopenia was 84.6%. After a median follow-up of 16.5 months after TIPS, SMI (0.020) and PMI (p < 0.001) increased, and sarcopenia decreased by 14.8% (0.109). MELD and PMI after TIPS were negatively correlated (r = - 0.536, p < 0.001). Albumin levels increased in patients with increased SMI after TIPS (p = 0.022). Confirming the positive impact of TIPS implantation on muscle indices in patients with liver cirrhosis, we found indications for improved survival and possible indications for altered metabolism with increased albumin levels in patients with increased muscle quantity.

Use and outcome of TIPS in hospitalized patients in Germany: A Nationwide study (2007-2018)

BACKGROUND

The number of complications in patients admitted for cirrhosis has increased over time. Portal hypertension is the driver of many complications of cirrhosis. TIPS placement is the most effective treatment of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to analyze the use and impact of TIPS placement in the last decade in a nationwide study in Germany.

METHODS

We analyzed 14,598 admissions of patients for TIPS insertions in Germany from 2007 to 2018 using the DRG system, 12,877 out of 2,000,765 total admissions of patients with cirrhosis. All diagnoses and procedures were coded according to ICD-10-CM and OPS codes. The data were analyzed, focusing on the number of admissions and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The number of TIPS placements increased over the last decade. In-hospital mortality of cirrhotic patients with TIPS decreased when it was placed for severe bleeding (15.2% [TIPS] vs. 19.5% [endoscopy treatment]), ascites (8.7% [TIPS] vs. 14.4% [paracentesis]), and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) (17.1% [TIPS] vs. 43.3% [no-TIPS]). In the case of bleeding, TIPS significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and also in ascites and HRS. During hospitalization, 22.6% admissions of patients with TIPS insertion showed HE. However, in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with HE grades 1 or 2 and TIPS was lower than in patients without TIPS. In the logistic regression, a higher HE grade(3 and 4), infection, and circulatory disease were found to be independently associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with TIPS insertion.

CONCLUSION

Our nationwide study demonstrates that TIPS insertion is increasingly used in Germany. TIPS improves outcomes, especially in patients with ascites and HRS, regardless of lower HE grades, while higher HE grades, infection, and circulatory diseases seem to be associated with risk of in-hospital mortality.

[Complications of liver cirrhosis]

Liver cirrhosis is a chronic disease, progressing from a compensated and asymptomatic state to decompensated cirrhosis with the occurrence of multiple organ complications. This progression is accompanied by a significant increase of morbidity and mortality. Main complications include clinical manifestations of portal hypertension (ascites and varices) as well as consequences of liver insufficiency as hepatic encephalopathy. Besides, many other organ systems can be affected, as liver cirrhosis is today more and more seen as a multisystemic disease. Unfortunately, most therapy options of these complications are purely symptomatic, and the only curative treatment of advanced chronic liver disease is liver transplantation.

Predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: Value of three minimal hepatic encephalopathy tests

Background & Aims

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent and severe complication in patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, risk factors for post-TIPS HE remain poorly defined. Minimal HE (mHE) is a well-known risk factor for overt HE in patients with cirrhosis without TIPS. We aimed to evaluate three tools frequently used for diagnosing mHE for their dynamic changes and their predictive value for overt HE after TIPS.

Methods

We prospectively recruited 84 consecutive patients before TIPS insertion and monitored them for 180 days for post-TIPS HE. Before TIPS insertion, the patients underwent the portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) syndrome test, the animal naming test (ANT), and the critical flicker frequency (CFF). Patients were retested after TIPS insertion.

Results

The majority of patients were male (67.9%), and the predominant indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (75%). Median age was 59 years, model for end-stage liver disease score was 12, and 66.3%, 64.6%, and 28.4% patients had evidence for mHE according to the PSE syndrome test, ANT, and CFF, respectively. Overall, 25 patients developed post-TIPS HE within 180 days after TIPS insertion. Post-TIPS incidence of overt HE was 22.2, 28.6, 45.5, and 55.6% in those with no, one, two, and three pathological tests at baseline, respectively. However, none of the three tests was significantly associated with post-TIPS HE. Of note, mean performance in all tests remained stable over time after TIPS insertion.

Conclusions

PSE syndrome test, ANT and CFF, which are frequently used for diagnosing mHE have limited value for predicting HE after TIPS insertion. We could not find evidence that TIPS insertion leads to a psychometric decline in the long term.

Impact and implications

This prospective observational study compared three diagnostic tests for mHE and showed the limited value of these tests for predicting overt HE in patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS insertion. In addition, the results suggest that cognitive performance generally remains stable after TIPS insertion. These results are important for physicians and researchers involved in the management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS procedures. The study's findings serve as a starting point for further investigations on the development of more effective strategies for predicting and managing post-TIPS HE.

Clinical trial number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04801290.