Clinical Outcome of Postoperative Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Posterior Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Instrumentation

Construction and validation of a nomogram predictive model for assessing the risk of surgical site infections following posterior lumbar fusion surgery

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant concern following posterior lumbar fusion surgery, leading to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. Accurate prediction of SSI risk is crucial for implementing preventive measures and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to construct and validate a nomogram predictive model for assessing the risk of SSIs following posterior lumbar fusion surgery. A retrospective study was conducted on 1015 patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. Clinical data, including patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, were collected. SSIs were defined based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. Univariate analysis identified significant risk factors, which were then included in a binary logistic regression to develop the nomogram. The model's performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The incidence of SSIs was 5.02% (51/1015). The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Significant risk factors for SSIs included smoking history, diabetes, surgery duration ≥ 3 h, intraoperative blood loss ≥ 300 ml, ASA classification ≥ 3, postoperative closed drainage duration ≥ 5 days, incision length ≥ 10 cm, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, and the presence of internal fixation. The nomogram demonstrated a C-index of 0.779 and an AUC of 0.845, indicating high predictive accuracy. The calibration curve closely matched the ideal curve, confirming the model's reliability. The constructed nomogram predictive model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting SSI risk following posterior lumbar fusion surgery. This model can aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and implementing targeted preventive measures to improve surgical outcomes.

Association between postoperative intravenous methylprednisolone and surgical site infection in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective single-center study

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between intravenous methylprednisolone administration and the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study analyzed data from 800 adult patients who underwent elective PLF surgery at our institution. Patients were classified according to postoperative intravenous methylprednisolone administration. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression, and subgroup analysis were used to assess the association between methylprednisolone administration and SSI risk, as well as its impact on postoperative pain management.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed no significant association between intravenous methylprednisolone administration and the development of a SSI after PLF. Subgroup analyses suggested that methylprednisolone was potentially protective in patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m2. In addition, patients treated with methylprednisolone had significantly lower pain scores in the early postoperative period, and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to patients not treated with methylprednisolone. However, there was no significant difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at 4 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that intravenous methylprednisolone administration may not increase the risk of SSI after single-level PLF. In addition, it appears to have a beneficial effect on postoperative pain management and PONV, especially during the early recovery phase.

Removal of Spinal Instrumentation Is Not Required to Successfully Treat Postoperative Wound Infections in Most Cases

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding whether spinal implants need to be removed to treat postoperative deep wound infections (DWIs). This retrospective study aimed to determine whether the removal or retention of implants impacts the successful treatment of a DWI after spine surgery.

METHODS

Postoperative spine surgery patients presenting with signs of infection who underwent irrigation and debridement (I&D) at Twin Cities Spine Surgeons at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minnesota, USA, were studied. First, the persistence of infection when implants were retained or removed was assessed. Second, we analyzed the persistence of infection with respect to the number of I&D, the use of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) treatment, pseudoarthrosis status, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five patients were included. Treatment of infection with retention of implants occurred in 64% (87/135); of these, 7% (6/87) had a persistent infection. Of patients with implant removal (36%, 48/135), 6% (3/48) had a persistent infection. Thus, we observed no difference between treatment with implants present compared to implants removed (p = 1.0). Fifty of the 135 patients (37%) received I&D and primary wound closure, and 85 (63%) patients received I&D and VAC treatment. There was no statistical difference between primary wound closure and VAC treatment (p = 0.15) with respect to persistence. Repeat I&D with VAC (three or more times) had a significantly lower rate of recurrence than those with two I&Ds. Pseudoarthrosis and persistent infection were unrelated. At minimum one-year follow-up, achieving a minimum clinically important difference in functional outcome was independent of persistent infection status.

CONCLUSION

Persistent infection was unrelated to the retention of implants. When VAC treatment was deemed necessary, more than two I&Ds resulted in a significantly better cure for infection. Those with a persistent infection were no more likely to exhibit pseudoarthrosis than those with no persistent infection. All patients showed improvement in functional outcomes at minimum one-year follow-up.

Factors Contributing to Surgical Site Infections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Etiology and Risk Factors

Surgical site infections persist as a substantial concern within the realm of hospital-acquired infections. This enduring issue is further compounded by the mounting challenge of antibiotic resistance, a surge in surgical interventions, and the presence of comorbidities among patients. Thus, a comprehensive exploration of all discernible risk factors, as well as proactive preventive and prophylactic strategies, becomes imperative. Moreover, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms has reached alarming proportions. Consequently, there is an acute need to investigate and scrutinize all potential therapeutic interventions to counter this burgeoning threat. Consequently, the primary objective of this review is to meticulously assess the origins and risk elements intertwined with surgical site infections across a diverse spectrum of surgical procedures. As the medical landscape continues to evolve, this critical analysis seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of the multi-faceted factors contributing to surgical site infections, with the overarching aim of facilitating more effective management and mitigation strategies. By exploring these dimensions comprehensively, we endeavor to enhance patient safety and the quality of surgical care in this era of evolving healthcare challenges.

Postoperative spine surgical site infections: high rate of failure of one-stage irrigation and debridement

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Following spine surgery, postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is a rare but potentially devastating complication. Previous studies have assessed risk factors for spine SSI and one aimed to develop risk stratification tool to assess management options, but this tool has not been externally validated or regularly used.

PURPOSE

The current study aimed to investigate the rate of SSI following elective spine surgery, surgical management pursued, and success of traditionally utilized one-stage of irrigation and debridement (I&D) with closure over drains.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult, elective spine surgeries performed at a single academic institution between 2013 and 2021 were evaluated. Patients who developed SSI requiring surgical intervention were identified.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Those who underwent initial management with I&D and closure over drains were assessed for need of subsequent I&D (considered failure of initial infection management).

METHODS

Of spine surgeries meeting inclusion criteria, those with SSI were identified and management was characterized. For those who did and did not fail attempted one stage I&D with closure over drains, pre-operative and surgical variables from the index procedure as well as infection characteristics were assessed and compared with univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Of 11,023 elective spine surgeries, SSI was identified for 76 (0.7%). For initial management, I&D with closure over drains was used for 66 (86.8%) while I&D and wound vacuum management was used 10 (13.2%). Failure of attempted one stage I&D (requiring subsequent I&D procedure) was identified for 18 (27% of those undergoing I&D and closure over drains). Of multiple patient, surgical, and infection characteristics, the only factor identified as independently predictive of one stage I&D failure was presence of bacteremia (odds ratio [OR] 38.3, p=0.0007). Within the sub-cohort of patients with bacteremia, failure of attempted one stage I&D was noted for 80%.

CONCLUSION

Less than one percent of a large cohort of patients undergoing spine surgery were found to develop SSIs. Of those undergoing attempted one stage I&D, most patient, surgical, and infection variables did not influence outcome of the intervention. However, those with bacteremia were at 38.3 times greater odds of failing attempted one-stage I&D. These results suggest considering delayed closure approaches in these cases.