Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the intercostal nerves through the posterior approach: an anatomic study and two case reports

A systematic review of axon count measurement and reporting for nerve transfers in the upper extremity

INTRODUCTION

Axon counts in the literature vary by source and method, and no single source summarizes all brachial plexus nerves. This review aims to compile these counts in one article and assess comparability across studies.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in November 2023, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Four databases were assessed using different variations of the terms "nerve axon count* AND "upper extremity". 539 articles were found and screened, and after full text assessment of the pre-selected articles, 54 articles were finally retained. For these articles, the axon counts, SD, and ranges were collected for all upper extremities' nerves. If more than one article counted the axons of a specific nerve and if the difference between the counts was less than 100%, an average count was calculated.

RESULTS

In the 54 articles a total of 56 nerves were assessed. Axon counts of 18 nerves were done only in a single study. In the comparison between the averages in between studies, in 20 nerves the difference excided 100% between the highest and lowest value. For 16 nerves a metanalysis could been performed and presented in the article.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed enormous differences in axon counts across various studies, reaching up to a factor of 87 between the averages from one study to another. Additionally, the quality of the methods of these studies varies, particularly since axon count is frequently reported as a secondary or tertiary outcome. This insight cautions surgeons against using axon counts from studies with differing methodologies to plan nerve transfers.

A Comprehensive Review of Topography and Axon Counts in Upper-Extremity Peripheral Nerves: A Guide for Neurotization

Purpose

Currently, no comprehensive database detailing topography and axon counts exists. This study aims to review the axon counts and topography of the major peripheral motor nerves of the upper extremity to allow for optimal surgical planning for peripheral nerve reconstruction via neurotization.

Methods

Peer-reviewed journal articles were identified through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL. Studies were included for review based upon the identification of the described topography or axon count of any upper-extremity peripheral motor nerve. Animal research, laboratory studies, and unpublished studies were excluded from our review. A total of 43 studies were identified, and 38 of these met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to determine axon count averages for all upper extremity motor nerves identified in the included studies.

Results

Thirty-eight studies were reviewed, giving insights into the topography and axon counts of the major peripheral nerves of the upper extremity, including the brachial plexus and its terminal branches as well as common donor nerves such as the spinal accessory nerve and intercostal nerves. Studies showed considerable variability in reported axon counts.

Conclusions

Existing data were relatively weak and included several case reports and series. Taking this into consideration, we posit that there is a need for further studies of upper-extremity nerve axon counts that include large study populations and more consistent methods of nerve specimen analysis.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the topographical anatomy of donor and recipient nerves, as well as appropriately matching the motor axon counts for each donor and recipient, is helpful in upper-extremity nerve reconstruction.

Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries: advances and current updates

Nerve grafting, tendon transfer and joint fusion are routinely used to improve the upper limb function in patients with brachial plexus palsies. Newer techniques have been developed that provide additional options for reconstruction. Nerve transfer is a tool for restoring upper limb function in total root avulsions where nerve grafting is not possible. In partial brachial plexus injuries, nerve transfers can greatly improve shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand function. Intraoperative electrical stimulation can be used to diagnose precisely which nerve is injured and to choose which nerve fascicles should be transferred. Finally, measuring the postoperative outcome can improve the evaluation of our techniques. The aim of this article was to present the current techniques used to treat patients with brachial plexus injury.

The association between number of intercostal nerves transferred and elbow flexion: a systematic review and pooled analysis

OBJECTIVE

This pooled analysis evaluates the association between the number of nerves transferred and postoperative outcomes after intercostal nerve (ICN) nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

METHODS

A systematic and pooled analysis of studies reporting individual patient demographics and outcomes after ICN-musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer for traumatic brachial plexus injury was conducted. The primary outcome was the ability to attain an elbow flexion Medical Research Council (MRC) score of ≥4 at the final postoperative follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included for a total of 128 patients. There were 43 patients who underwent two ICNT, 77 patients who underwent three ICNT, and 8 patients who underwent four ICNT. The three groups did not differ in ability to achieve MRC ≥ 4 (2ICNT 48.8%, 3ICNT 42.9%, 4ICNT 50.0%, p = 0.789). The number of ICNs transferred was not associated with MRC scores ≥4 on the multivariable analysis (OR: 0.55, p = 0.126).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that two ICN transfers may be as effective as three ICN and four ICN transfers and highlight the potential for nonsurgical factors to influence postoperative outcomes. Taken together, this pooled analysis leads us to question the utility of transferring >2 ICNs for MCN neurotization.

An Anatomical Feasibility Study on the Use of the Hypoglossal and Hemihypoglossal Nerve as a Donor Motor Nerve for Free Functioning Muscle Transfer in Upper Extremity Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Brachial plexus injuries (BPI) with complete root avulsions remains a clinical challenge due to a paucity of nerves available for nerve transfer and innervation of free functioning muscle transfers (FFMT). The hypoglossal and hemihypoglossal nerve has not been studied as a donor nerve option for FFMTs in brachial plexus reconstruction, despite successful outcomes of hypoglossal nerve transfers in facial reanimation surgery. We hypothesized that the hypoglossal nerve could be an appropriate candidate for surgical repair of BPI using FFMT.

METHODS

A cadaveric study was performed to determine the anatomic feasibility of using the hypoglossal and hemihypoglossal nerves as donor nerves to neurotize the gracilis or latissimus dorsi muscle in an FFMT to restore elbow flexion. Twelve cadavers (6 males and 6 females) were studied. The hypoglossal nerve, thoracodorsal nerve, and obturator nerve branches to the gracilis muscle were dissected, measured, and analyzed.

RESULTS

The average length of the hypoglossal nerve was 6.3 ± 0.5 cm in both sexes. The average distance between the lowest point of the hypoglossal nerve and the lateral clavicle was 8.4 ± 1.3 cm in males and 7.7 ± 0.8 cm in females. When the hypoglossal nerve was transected distally, the average distance to the clavicle was 4.5 ± 1.6 cm in males and 3.8 ± 1.5 cm in females.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum theoretical length of the donor nerve required to perform an adequate FFMT using the hypoglossal nerve was 8.9 ± 1.2 cm, which was well exceeded by the lengths of the thoracodorsal nerve (14.5 ± 1.3 cm) and nerve to the gracilis muscle (12.7 ± 1.7 cm).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This cadaveric study demonstrated that the hypoglossal or hemihypoglossal nerves may be used as potential motor donor nerves to innervate a free gracilis or latissimus dorsi muscle transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion via a direct nerve transfer without the need for nerve grafting.

Possible donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstruction in dual neurotization for restoring shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Restoring shoulder abduction is one of the main priorities in the surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Double nerve transfer to the axillary nerve and suprascapular nerve is widely used and considered the best option. The most common donor nerve for the suprascapular nerve is the spinal accessory nerve. However, donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstructions vary and it is still unclear which donor nerve has the best outcome. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on reconstructions of suprascapular and axillary nerves and to perform a meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of different donor nerves on axillary nerve reconstructions. We conducted a systematic search of English literature from March 2001 to December 2020 following PRISMA guidelines. Two outcomes were assessed, abduction strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-two studies describing the use of donor nerves met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Donor nerves investigated included the radial nerve, intercostal nerves, medial pectoral nerve, ulnar nerve fascicle, median nerve fascicle and the lower subscapular nerve. Fifteen studies that investigated the radial and intercostal nerves met the inclusion criteria for a meta-analysis. We found no statistically significant difference between either of these nerves in the abduction strength according to MRC score (radial nerve 3.66 ± 1.02 vs intercostal nerves 3.48 ± 0.64, p = 0.086). However, the difference in ROM was statistically significant (radial nerve 106.33 ± 39.01 vs. intercostal nerve 80.42 ± 24.9, p < 0.001). Our findings support using a branch of the radial nerve for the triceps muscle as a donor for axillary nerve reconstruction when possible. Intercostal nerves can be used in cases of total brachial plexus injury or involvement of the C7 root or posterior fascicle. Other promising methods need to be studied more thoroughly in order to validate and compare their results with the more commonly used methods.

Hand Surgery in Thailand

Modern hand surgery in Thailand started after the end of World War II. It is divided into 4 phases. In the initial phase (1950-1965), the surgery of the hand was mainly performed by general surgeons. In 1965-1975, which was the second phase, many plastic surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons graduated from foreign countries and came back to Thailand. They played a vital role in the treatment of the surgery of the hand and set up hand units in many centers. They also contributed to the establishment of the "Thai Society for Surgery of the Hand," which still continues to operate. In the third phase (1975-2000), there was a dramatic development of microsurgery because of the rapid economic expansion. There were many replantation, free tissue transfers, and brachial plexus surgeries in traffic and factory-related accidents. The first hand-fellow training program began in 1993. In the fourth phase (since 2000), the number of hand injuries from factory-related accidents began declining. But the injury from traffic accidents had been increasing both in severity and number. Moreover, the diseases of hand that relate to aging and degeneration had been on the rise. Thai hand surgeons have been using several state-of-the-art technologies such as arthroscopic and endoscopic surgery. They are continuing to invent innovations, generating international publications, and frequently being invited as speakers in foreign countries.

Surgical reconstructions for adult brachial plexus injuries. Part I: Treatments for combined C5 and C6 injuries, with or without C7 injuries

Brachial plexus injuries will cause a significantly decreased quality of life. Patients with upper arm type brachial plexus injuries, which means C5 and C6 roots injury, will lose their shoulder elevation/abduction/external rotation, and elbow flexion function. Additional elbow, wrist, and hand extension function deficit will occur in patients with C7 root injury. With the advances of reconstructive procedures, the upper arm brachial plexus injuries can be successfully restored through nerve repair, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, muscle / tendon transfer and free functioning muscle transfer. In this review article, we summarized the various reconstructive procedures to restore the function of shoulder and elbow. Nowadays, the upper arm type BPI can be treat with satisfied outcomes (80-90% successful rate).

Comparative Study of Intercostal Nerve and Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfers for Elbow Extension After Global Brachial Plexus Avulsion

INTRODUCTION

Elbow extensive reconstruction was essential for the patients with brachial plexus avulsion. Nerve transfer was applied to repair elbow extension, but the ultimate recovery was quite different. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of elbow extension in patients with global brachial plexus avulsion after repaired by intercostal nerve (ICN) and contralateral cervical 7 (cC7) nerve transfer to the long head branch of triceps and to analyze the possible influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 24 patients treated with ICN and cC7 nerve transfer for elbow extension in posttraumatic global brachial plexus avulsion was carried out. Two ICNs were used as donors in 17 patients, and cC7 nerve was used in the other 7 patients. We evaluated the recovery of elbow extension by the British Medical Research Council grading system and electromyography. The correlation between age, preoperative interval, and prognosis was analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Efficiency of elbow extensor strength in the ICN transfer group was 47.06%, and it was 28.57% in the cC7 nerve transfer group, but there was no significant difference (P = 0.653). The effective recovery of electromyography in ICN transfer group was 82.35%, whereas in the group cC7 nerve transfer, it was 28.57%, there was a statistical difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.021). Age and interval were negatively correlated with prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intercostal nerve or cC7 nerve transfer to the long head branch of triceps could reconstruct elbow extension to some extent. Compared with cC7 nerve transfer, ICN transfer had a greater result for elbow extension, but the difference in extension power was not significant, whereas there was difference in electromyography recovery. Patient's age and interval were negatively correlated with the results.

Surgical strategy in extensive proximal brachial plexus palsies

PURPOSE

To describe and assess an overall surgical strategy addressing extensive proximal brachial plexus injuries (BPI).

METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients' charts with C5-C6-C7 and C5-C6-C7-C8 BPI were reviewed. Primary procedures were nerve transfers to restore elbow function and grafts to restore shoulder function when a cervical root was available; when nerve surgery was not possible or had failed, tendon transfers were conducted at the elbow while addressing shoulder function with glenohumeral arthrodesis or humeral osteotomy. Tendon transfers were used to restore finger extension.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent elbow flexion reanimation: thirty-eight had nerve transfers and eight received tendon transfers, including five cases secondary to nerve surgery failure; grade-3 strength or greater was reached in thirty-seven cases (90%). Twenty-nine patients had nerve transfers to restore elbow extension: twenty-five recovered grade-3 or grade-4 strength (86%). Forty-one patients underwent shoulder surgery: fourteen had nerve surgery and thirty-one received palliative procedures, including four cases secondary to nerve surgery failure; thirty patients recovered at least 60° of abduction and rotation (73%). Distal reconstruction was performed in thirty-seven patients, providing finger full extension in all cases but two (95%).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized strategy may be used in extensive proximal BPI, providing overall satisfactory outcomes.

Anatomic study of the intercostal nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve and a case report

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical basis of intercostal nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve and provide a case report. Thoracic walls of 30 embalmed human cadavers were used to investigate the anatomical feasibility for neurotization of the suprascapular nerve with intercostal nerves in brachial plexus root avulsions. We found that the 3rd and 4th intercostal nerves could be transferred to the suprascapular nerve without a nerve graft. Based on the anatomical study, the 3rd and 4th intercostal nerves were transferred to the suprascapular nerve via the deltopectoral approach in a 42-year-old man who had had C5-7 root avulsions and partial injury of C8, T1 of the right brachial plexus. Thirty-two months postoperatively, the patient gained 30° of shoulder abduction and 45° of external rotation. This procedure provided us with a reliable and convenient method for shoulder function reconstruction after brachial plexus root avulsion accompanied with spinal accessory nerve injury. It can also be used when the accessory nerve is intact but needs to be preserved for better shoulder stability or possible future trapezius transfer.

Shoulder abduction and external rotation restoration with nerve transfer

INTRODUCTION

In upper brachial plexus palsy patients, loss of shoulder function and elbow flexion is obvious as the result of paralysed muscles innervated by the suprascapular, axillary and musculocutaneus nerve. Shoulder stabilisation, restoration of abduction and external rotation are important as more distal functions will be affected by the shoulder situation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2011, eleven patients with upper type brachial plexus palsy were operated on with triceps nerve branch transfer to anterior axillary nerve branch and spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction and external rotation restoration. Nine patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. All patients were men with ages ranged from 21 to 35 years (average, 27.4 years). The interval between injury and surgery ranged from 4 to 11 months (average, 7.2 months). Atrophy of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and deltoid muscle and subluxation at the glenohumeral joint was obvious in all patients preoperatively. During the pre-op examination all patients had at least muscle grading 4 on the triceps muscle.

RESULTS

The mean post-operative value of shoulder abduction was 112.2° (range: 60-170°) while preoperatively none of the patients was able for abduction (p<0.001). The mean post-operative value of shoulder external rotation was 66° (range: 35-110°) while preoperatively none of them was able for external rotation (p<0.001). Postoperative values of shoulder abduction were significantly better that those of external rotation (p=0.0004). The postoperative average muscle grading for shoulder abduction according the MRC scale was 3.6±0.5 and for the shoulder external rotation was 3.2±0.4.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined nerve transfer by using the spinal accessory nerve for suprascapular nerve neurotisation and one of the triceps nerve branches for axillary nerve and teres minor branch neurotisation is an excellent choice for shoulder abduction and external rotation restoration.

Brachial plexus injury in adults: Diagnosis and surgical treatment strategies

Adult post traumatic Brachial plexus injury is unfortunately a rather common injury in young adults. In India the most common scenario is of a young man injured in a motorcycle accident. Exact incidence figures are not available but of the injuries presenting to us about 90% invole the above combination This article reviews peer-reviewed publications including clinical papers, review articles and Meta analysis of the subject. In addition, the authors' experience of several hundred cases over the last 15 years has been added and has influenced the ultimate text. Results have been discussed and analysed to get an idea of factors influencing final recovery. It appears that time from injury and number of roots involved are most crucial.

Simultaneous intercostal nerve transfers to deltoid and triceps muscle through the posterior approach

PURPOSE

This study reports the results of restoring the deltoid and triceps functions in patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion injuries by simultaneously transferring 4 intercostal nerves to the anterior axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps through the posterior approach.

METHODS

Nine patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion injuries underwent spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve combined with transfer of the third and fourth intercostal nerves to the anterior axillary nerve for shoulder reconstruction. Simultaneous transfer of the fifth and sixth intercostal nerves to the radial nerve branch of the triceps was done to restore elbow extension.

RESULTS

For shoulder function, 8 patients had M4 recovery and 1 patient had M2 recovery. Average shoulder abduction and external rotation were 69° and 42°, respectively. For elbow extension, 3 patients achieved M3 recovery, 5 patients had M2 recovery, and 1 patient had M1 recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of 2 muscles with intercostal nerves is possible when both muscles act synergistically, such as shoulder abduction and elbow extension. Two intercostal nerves are adequate to transfer for deltoid reconstruction but not enough for elbow extension against gravity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Obstetric brachial plexus injury

Obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI), also known as birth brachial plexus injury (BBPI), is unfortunately a rather common injury in newborn children. Incidence varies between 0.15 and 3 per 1000 live births in various series and countries. Although spontaneous recovery is known, there is a large subset which does not recover and needs primary or secondary surgical intervention. An extensive review of peer-reviewed publications has been done in this study, including clinical papers, review articles and systematic review of the subject. In addition, the authors' experience of several hundred cases over the last 15 years has been added and has influenced the ultimate text. Causes of OBPI, indications of primary nerve surgery and secondary reconstruction of shoulder, etc. are discussed in detail. Although all affected children do not require surgery in infancy, a substantial proportion of them, however, require it and are better off for it. Secondary surgery is needed for shoulder elbow and hand problems. Results of nerve surgery are very encouraging. Children with OBPI should be seen early by a hand surgeon dealing with brachial plexus injuries. Good results are possible with early and appropriate intervention even in severe cases.

Outcome of axillary nerve injuries treated with nerve grafts

This study evaluates the outcome of axillary nerve injuries treated with nerve grafting. Thirty-six patients were retrospectively reviewed after a mean of 53 months (minimum 12 months). The mean interval from injury to surgery was 6.5 months. Recovery of deltoid function was assessed by the power of both abduction and retropulsion, the deltoid bulk and extension lag. The deltoid bulk was almost symmetrical in nine of 34 cases, good in 22 and wasted in three. Grade M4 or M5* was achieved in 30 of 35 for abduction and in 32 of 35 for retropulsion. There was an extension lag in four patients. Deltoid bulk continued to improve with a longer follow-up following surgery. Nerve grafting to the axillary nerve is a reliable method of regaining deltoid function when the lesion is distal to its origin from the posterior cord.

Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

In treating patients with brachial plexus injury, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of nerve grafts or nerve transfers for isolated upper trunk or C5-C6-C7 root injuries. The purpose of our study was to compare, with systematic review, the outcomes for modern intraplexal nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function with autogenous nerve grafting for upper brachial plexus traumatic injuries.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within one year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of twelve months. Strength and shoulder and elbow motion were assessed as outcome measures. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven (83%) and 286 (96%) of 299 patients with nerve transfers achieved elbow flexion strength of grade M4 or greater and M3 or greater, respectively, compared with thirty-two (56%) and forty-seven (82%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). Forty (74%) of fifty-four patients with dual nerve transfers for shoulder function had shoulder abduction strength of grade M4 or greater compared with twenty (35%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve transfer to a single nerve and thirteen (46%) of twenty-eight patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). The average shoulder abduction and external rotation was 122° (range, 45° to 170°) and 108° (range, 60° to 140°) after dual nerve transfers and 50° (range, 0° to 100°) and 45° (range, 0° to 140°) in patients with nerve transfers to a single nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with demonstrated complete traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries of C5-C6, the pooled international data strongly favors dual nerve transfer over traditional nerve grafting for restoration of improved shoulder and elbow function. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal, or when long nerve grafts are contemplated.

Clinical outcomes following median to radial nerve transfers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with radial nerve palsy who underwent nerve transfers using redundant fascicles of median nerve (innervating the flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor carpi radialis muscles) to the posterior interosseous nerve and the nerve to the extensor carpi radialis brevis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the clinical records of 19 patients with radial nerve injuries who underwent nerve transfer procedures using the median nerve as a donor nerve. All patients were evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system. The mean age of patients was 41 years (range, 17-78 y). All patients received at least 12 months of follow-up (range, 20.3 ± 5.8 mo). Surgery was performed at a mean of 5.7 ± 1.9 months postinjury.

RESULTS

Postoperative functional evaluation was graded according to the following scale: grades MRC 0/5 to MRC 2/5 were considered poor outcomes, whereas an MRC grade of 3/5 was a fair result, 4/5 was a good result, and 4+/5 was an excellent outcome. Postoperatively, all patients except one had good to excellent recovery of wrist extension. A total of 12 patients recovered good to excellent finger and thumb extension, 2 had fair recovery, and 5 had poor recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve is commonly injured, causing severe morbidity in affected patients. The median nerve provides a reliable source of donor nerve fascicles for radial nerve reinnervation. The important nuances of both surgical technique and motor reeducation critical for the success of this transfer have been identified and are discussed.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Shoulder reanimation in posttraumatic brachial plexus paralysis

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic brachial plexus paralysis invariably involves the upper roots leading to paralysis of the shoulder region musculature. Early neurotisation of the suprascapular and the axillary nerve should be one of the priorities in plexus reconstruction in order to reanimate the shoulder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2007, 78 patients with posttraumatic brachial plexus palsy were operated in our department. Forty-three patients presented with supraclavicular lesions with involvement of C5 and C6 roots in all cases. Reconstruction of the shoulder function was achieved with neurotisation of the suprascapular nerve in 41 patients. Extraplexus donors were utilised in 34 patients, while intraplexus donors via nerve grafts in 7 patients. Neurotisation of the axillary nerve was performed in 25 patients, utilising intraplexus donors in 16 patients, extraplexus donors in 4, and combination of intraplexus and extraplexus donors in 5 patients.

RESULTS

Suprascapular nerve neurotisation gave good or excellent results (supraspinatus>M3+ or shoulder abduction>40 degrees) in 35 patients. Intraplexus donors regained good or excellent function in 5 out of 6 patients (83%), while extraplexus neurotisations achieved good or excellent function of the supraspinatus in 30 out of 34 patients (88%). Axillary nerve neurotisation offered good or excellent results (deltoid>M3+ or shoulder abduction>60 degrees) in 14 patients (58%). Direct neurotisation of the axillary nerve via the motor branch for the long head of the triceps gave shoulder abduction of >110 degrees, as well as external rotation of >30 degrees in 3 out of 5 patients. Combined neurotisation of suprascapular and axillary nerves gave the best outcome achieving shoulder abduction of >60 degrees as well as external rotation of >30 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder reanimation should be one of the first priorities in brachial plexus reconstruction. Early neurotisation of the suprascapular, and if possible the axillary nerve offers the best outcome.

Transfer of the first intercostal nerve to supra- and infraspinatus muscles: an anatomical study and report of the first case

We have assessed the anatomical feasibility of a transfer of the first intercostal nerve to the supra- and infraspinatus muscles and report on the first clinical application. Ten fresh cadavers were dissected for this study. Histomorphometric analysis showed the fascicular surface area of the first intercostal nerve at its origin (0.38 mm(2)) to be comparable to the suprascapular nerve (0.81 mm(2)). The first intercostal nerve is usually a pure motor nerve. Preservation of the spinal accessory nerve, lack of donor site morbidity and direct suture without nerve graft are the other advantages of this transfer. Its principal indication is in lesions of the upper brachial plexus, used in association with neurotisation of two other intercostal nerves to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. At 21 months follow-up there was useful motor reinnervation in the first clinical case.