Distal scaphoid resection for degenerative arthritis secondary to scaphoid nonunion: a 20-year experience

Proximal row carpectomy or scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis for treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis

Degenerative wrist conditions, such as scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, often require salvage procedures to reduce pain and improve function. For early stages of disease, both proximal row carpectomy and scaphoid excision four-corner arthrodesis are viable motion-preserving options. There remains controversy on which technique is superior. Selection is a nuanced decision that requires consideration of patient characteristics and stage of disease. The traditional notion that proximal row carpectomy should be reserved for older individuals with low demands has been challenged; long-term studies in younger populations demonstrate similar patient-reported outcomes, pain relief and survivorship without conversion to total wrist arthrodesis between proximal row carpectomy and four-corner arthrodesis. The existing evidence suggests proximal row carpectomy has advantages of greater range of motion, fewer complications and lower costs. Advancements such as arthroscopic techniques for both procedures show potential, although mastery involves a steep learning curve.

Distal Scaphoid Excision and Dermal Allograft Interposition in a Professional Athlete: Long-term Follow-up

Scaphoid nonunion occurs in 10%-15% of scaphoid fractures, potentially resulting in scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. Distal scaphoid excision without allograft interposition is a known treatment, but can result in loss of carpal height and pain. This report describes the application of human acellular dermal matrix as an interposition graft after distal scaphoid excision for stage I scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. Postoperatively, the patient initiated early range of motion and returned to full activity at 6 weeks. He demonstrated resolution of his pain 6 years later.

Morphology of the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint: A multi-domain statistical shape modeling approach

The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is involved in load transmission between the wrist and thumb. A quantitative description of baseline STT joint morphometrics is needed to capture the variation of normal anatomy as well as to guide staging of osteoarthritis. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) techniques quantify variations in three-dimensional shapes and relative positions. The objectives of this study are to describe the morphology of the STT joint using a multi-domain SSM. We asked: (1) What are the dominant modes of variation that impact bone and articulation morphology at the STT joint, and (2) what are the morphometrics of SSM-generated STT joints? Thirty adult participants were recruited to a computed tomography study of normal wrist imaging and biomechanics. Segmentations of the carpus were converted to three-dimensional triangular surface meshes. A multi-domain, particle-based entropy system SSM was used to quantify variation in carpal bone shape and position as well as articulation morphology. Articular surface areas and interosseous proximity distributions were calculated between mesh vertex pairs on adjacent bones within distance (2.0 mm) and surface-normal angular (35°) thresholds. In the SSM, the first five modes of variation captured 76.2% of shape variation and contributed to factors such as bone scale, articular geometries, and carpal tilt. Median interosseous proximities-a proxy for joint space-were 1.39 mm (scaphotrapezium), 1.42 mm (scaphotrapezoid), and 0.61 mm (trapeziotrapezoid). This study quantifies morphological and articular variations at the STT joint, presenting a range of normative anatomy. The range of estimated interosseous proximities may guide interpretation of imaging-derived STT joint space.

Distal Scaphoid Excision for Chronic and Nonchronic Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion

Purpose

The indications for distal scaphoid excision are limited to localized wrist arthritis surrounding the scaphoid, as a result of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse or scapho-trapezio-trapezoid joint arthritis. The procedure historically has led to relief of symptoms and improvement in strength. Our aim was to examine the outcomes of this procedure in patients with scaphoid fracture nonunion.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective case series of 12 consecutive patients who underwent distal scaphoid excision after scaphoid fracture nonunion. Patients were divided into the following two groups based on nonunion chronicity: chronic (more than a year) and nonchronic (less than a year). Clinical and radiographic data were examined using descriptive statistics.

Results

Our cohort consisted of 12 patients, 10 men (83%) and 2 women (17%), with a mean age of 37.6 ± 13.6 years. Eight patients had a chronic scaphoid fracture nonunion (six had a neglected scaphoid fracture and two had a nonunion after scaphoid open reduction and internal fixation with bone graft), and four patients had a nonchronic fracture nonunion (two had failed cast treatment and two had nonunion after scaphoid open reduction and internal fixation with bone graft). Before surgery, all patients complained of pain and four had numbness (all in the chronic group). After an average of 21 weeks after surgery, seven patients (58%) reported continued pain, two patients reported ulnar side pain, and one underwent arthroscopic synovectomy. All patients who started with a normal radiolunate angle continued to have a normal angle, whereas patients who had dorsal intercalated segmental instability prior to surgery persisted with it after surgery, except for a patient who underwent midcarpal fusion and had their radiolunate angle corrected.

Conclusions

Distal scaphoid excision is an effective procedure for carefully selected patients with periscaphoid wrist arthrosis. Patients with recent scaphoid fractures that failed treatment may also be treated with distal scaphoid resection.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic V.

Surgical Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures: Recommendations for Management

Background: Several operative treatments exist for scaphoid fractures, varying by approach (e.g., ercutaneous, volar, or dorsal), implant type (e.g., screw or Kirschner wire), and bone raft choice (e.g., none, nonvascularized, or vascularized). Many previous systematic eviews and meta-analyses have investigated outcomes following different surgicalÚpproaches, the use of vascularized versus nonvascularized bone graft for scaphoidßracture nonunions, and treatment for specific fracture patterns. However, given the advancements n scaphoid fracture treatment in recent years, there is a need for updated treatment recommendations hat would be beneficial to hand surgeons. Purpose: We present a comprehensive review of the operative treatment of scaphoid fractures based on recent literature and propose a unified treatment algorithm for managing these fractures. Methods: The English-language literature was searched from 2002 to 2023 for high evidence level (e.g., randomized trials), review, and meta-analysis articles with the following search terms: "scaphoid, "u8220"scaphoid" AND "nonunion, " and "scaphoid" AND "malunion. " Each article was creened by the authors to determine the scaphoid fracture scenario addressed and ubsequent treatment recommendations. The findings from article reviews were then rganized by scaphoid fracture types in this manuscript. Results: A total of 95 pertinent articles were ultimately selected and used as the basis for reviewing different scaphoid fracture scenarios. A treatment algorithm was then proposed based on literature review. Conclusion: This summary of the recent literature can guide hand surgeons in addressing scaphoidßractures. Future research in scaphoid fracture treatment, particularly for nonunions, would be most beneficial n the form of systematic review, meta-analysis, or multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials. Level of Evidence: IV.

How Much Scaphoid Can be Safely Resected? A Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Distal Scaphoid Resection

BACKGROUND

Resection of the distal pole of the scaphoid has been advocated as a simple alternative to other wrist salvage procedures for scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse and scaphotrapezio-trapezoid arthritis. However, the extent of scaphoid that may be resected without adversely affecting carpal kinematics has never been clearly defined.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric upper extremities were tested in a custom motion wrist simulator. A 3-stage sequential sectioning of the distal scaphoid protocol was performed in 25% increments then cyclic active wrist flexion-extension and dart thrower's motion trials were recorded.

RESULTS

The extent of distal scaphoid resection had no effect on overall wrist range of motion. The lunate assumed a more extended position following resection of the distal scaphoid compared to intact. At 25%, 50%, and 75% of distal scaphoid resection, the lunate extended to 13.32° ± 9.4°, 23.43° ± 7.5°, and 15.81° ± 16.9°, respectively. The capitate migrated proximally with 25% and 50% distal scaphoidectomy, and proximally and radially with 75% of the scaphoid resected. Resection of 75% of the scaphoid resulted in unstable wrist kinematics.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of up to 25% of the distal scaphoid did not significantly influence carpal kinematics and induced mild lunate extension deformity. Resection of 50% of the scaphoid induced further and potentially clinically significant lunate extension and dorsal intercalated segment instability. Further removal of 75% of the distal scaphoid induced capitate migration radially and unpredictable wrist kinematics. Consequently, removal of over 25% of the scaphoid should be avoided or supplemented with partial wrist fusion.

Surgical management of osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist

Osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist is common; varying disease manifestations and a spectrum of symptoms make it imperative to approach treatment strategies in an individualized fashion. In this review, attention is focused upon site specific diagnoses and indications for various surgical treatment strategies.

Effect of Trapeziectomy on Carpal Stability

Background: The scaphoid-trapezoid-trapezium (STT) articulation stabilizes the scaphoid and links the proximal and distal carpal rows. The purpose of the study was to determine whether trapezium excision in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal (TM) arthritis affects carpal stability. Methods: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was performed on all wrists that underwent trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty or ligament reconstruction, and tendon interposition for TM arthritis between 2004 and 2016. Radiographic outcome measures included the modified carpal height ratio (MCHR) and radioscaphoid (RS), radiolunate (RL), and scapholunate (SL) angles. Degenerative change at the TM and STT joints was classified according to the Eaton-Littler, and Knirk and Jupiter classification systems. Radiographic parameters were compared between preoperative and final follow-up time points. Results: A total of 122 wrists were included in the study with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range: 1.0-13.0 years). The mean RL (range: -2.2° ± 11.8° to -10.7° ± 16.5°) and RS angles (range: 52.6° ± 13.8° to 44.4° ± 17.8°) decreased significantly (<.001) without significant change in SL angle, indicating progressive lunate and scaphoid extension after trapeziectomy. The mean MCHR decreased significantly (range: 1.6 ± 0.1 to 1.5 ± 0.1) following trapeziectomy, indicating progressive carpal collapse. Progressive scaphoid-trapezoid arthrosis was observed following trapeziectomy. No other preoperative radiographic factors investigated were associated with significant differences in preoperative and postoperative values for radiographic outcome measures. Conclusions: Trapeziectomy can lead to loss of carpal height, coordinated extension of both the lunate and scaphoid, and progressive scaphotrapezoid arthrosis. As such, in wrists with dynamic or static carpal instability, trapeziectomy should be performed with caution due to the risk of carpal collapse with a nondissociative pattern of dorsal intercalated segment instability.

Free vascularized second metatarsophalangeal joint transfer for scaphotrapezial joint reconstruction after distal scaphoid excision and carpal collapse: A case report

Treatment of the destroyed scaphotrapezial (ST) joint in young patients is challenging due to the limited available options as they might not tolerate the stiffness, loss of grip strength and long-term complications of partial fusions, bone resections, and interposition implants or arthroplasties. This report presents the results of a free osteocutaneous joint transfer used to reconstruct the ST joint in a young patient suffering from ST destruction and carpal collapse. This 34-year-old patient was previously treated for a right scaphoid nonunion with distal scaphoid excision and interposition implant that evolved to destruction of the ST space, symptomatic carpal collapse associated and a ST height loss of 7 mm. The DASH score was 34 and the grip strength of 32 kg. The patient was treated with an osteocutaneous vascularized free transfer from the second metatarsophalangeal joint vascularized by the first dorsal metatarsal artery and anastomosed to the palmar carpal branch of the radial artery and a palmar superficial vein. After 3.5 months, the patient returned to full duty work as a mechanic. At the last follow-up, 3 years after the surgery, the patients had complete range of motion without clinical nor radiological degenerative changes. There were no postoperative complications. The DASH score was 3 and the grip strength was 53 kg. This reconstructive procedure allows to recreate a functional ST joint and to correct a carpal collapse avoiding degenerative wrist changes. It may be proposed to young patients who aim to recover a near normal function of their wrist.

Management of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse without proximal row carpectomy or four corner fusion

Four corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy are the most common techniques for the management of advanced radiocarpal arthritis due to longstanding scapholunate instability and scaphoid nonunion. The advantages and short comings of each technique have been well defined in the literature. Advancements in joint replacement and arthroscopic surgery have resulted in new operations to manage radiocarpal and midcarpal arthritis. Most of these new procedures are modifications of the two classical operations, but some use modern implants and newer materials. New individualized options, like osteochondral grafting in combination with proximal row carpectomy or (arthroscopic) distal resection of the scaphoid, allowed us to improve our treatment and offer patients less invasive but equally effective procedures. We consider that four corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy should not always be standard management for advanced radiocarpal arthritis.

Does the DISI matter after distal scaphoidectomy with tendon interposition for STT osteoarthritis?

Progression to dorsal extension of the lunate after distal scaphoidectomy was described more than a decade ago. Still, this technique remains a popular choice for surgical treatment of isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis (STT OA). This study aimed to investigate short-term postoperative function, patient satisfaction and radiographic outcomes of distal scaphoidectomy with tendon interposition for isolated STT OA in the wrist. Scaphoid resection width, amount of DISI and postoperative complications were also assessed. We evaluated all distal scaphoidectomies done at our hospital from 2012 to 2018. Postoperative clinical analysis consisted of grip and key pinch strength, joint amplitude, pain on visual analog scale (VAS), hand usability (VAS) and functional scores (QuickDASH and PRWHE scores). On follow-up radiographs, we measured the amount of DISI, resection height and scaphoid working length and compared them to functional scores. Eighteen patients with 21 operated wrists were eligible. Average time to postoperative evaluation was 36 (5-78) months. We observed DISI in 95% of the cases (n=19). A mean increase of 13° (±6) in radiolunate angle was noted when comparing pre- and postoperative radiographs. Neither the amount of DISI nor the resection height was significantly correlated with the functional scores. No revision surgery for advanced wrist collapse was reported. Four concomitant surgeries were needed. Distal scaphoid excision with tendon interposition yields good short-term results in isolated STT OA. While 95% of cases developed a DISI deformity, there were no cases of functional impairment. Longitudinal studies with long-term follow-up are required to further evaluate lunate extension and possible clinical implications.

Surgical Management of Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Arthritis

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) arthritis occurs commonly with basal joint arthritis, but can also occur in isolation or in conjunction with other patterns of wrist arthritis, such as scapholunate advanced collapse. Surgical options depend on the specific clinical scenario encountered. Isolated STT arthritis was classically managed with arthrodesis, but is now often addressed with distal scaphoid resection (open or arthroscopic), trapeziectomy (partial or complete) and partial trapezoid resection, or implant arthroplasty. Development of postoperative dorsal intercalary segment instability is a notable concern with any of these techniques. STT arthritis in conjunction with basal joint arthritis can be managed effectively with trapeziectomy and either partial trapezoid excision or distal scaphoid excision. STT arthritis with scapholunate advanced collapse is uncommon, but can be managed with proximal row carpectomy or scaphoidectomy and four-corner fusion. If basal joint arthritis is also present, trapeziectomy can additionally be performed, but grip strength is likely to be substantially diminished.

Scaphoid Reconstruction

Surgical strategies for scaphoid nonunions become more complex based on time from injury to treatment. The decision-making process, however, can follow a logical sequence. Scaphoid nonunions less than 1 year after trauma and no carpal malalignment can be treated with percutaneous screw fixation under fluoroscopic and/or arthroscopic guidance. Reinterventions or patients with avascular proximal poles that do not need substantial grafts are reliably treated with pedicle vascularized bone grafts. Resection of the distal pole of the scaphoid is a good option in old nonunions or after a failed scaphoid procedures. When there are radioscaphoid degenerative changes, salvage procedures such as proximal row carpectomy (PRC) should be considered.

Distal Scaphoid Excision in Treatment of Symptomatic Scaphoid Nonunion: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Current treatment options for persistent scaphoid nonunion are limited to salvage procedures such as proximal row carpectomy (PRC) or 4-corner fusion (4CF). Several small studies have demonstrated that distal scaphoid excision may provide a simpler alternative with faster recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of distal scaphoid excision as a treatment option for symptomatic scaphoid nonunion. Methods: The MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for the use of distal scaphoid excision in scaphoid nonunions. Studies included reported on either the functional or patient-centered outcomes following distal scaphoid excision for symptomatic scaphoid nonunion. Results: Six articles described the outcomes of 70 patients with an average of 11.7 patients per study. Functional outcomes including flexion-extension arc, radial-ulnar deviation, and grip strength improved by an average of 98.95%, 58.96%, and 131.08%, respectively. Patient-derived outcomes included the Modified Mayo Wrist Score, which improved by 92.6%, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, which improved by 137.17%. An average of 68.75% of patients experience complete relief of pain with 20.83% of patients experiencing pain with strenuous activity. The average postoperative visual analog scale (0-10) was 0.71. On average, 93.33% of patients returned to work with an average time of return being 6.89 weeks. Complete satisfaction was reported by 87.80% of patients. Complications included progression into 4CF or PRC and newly developed midcarpal arthritis. Conclusions: Given favorable outcomes, our analysis suggests that distal scaphoid excision may be a favorable, low-risk treatment for scaphoid nonunion without eliminating more extensive options such as 4CF and wrist arthrodesis.

Arthroscopic Distal Scaphoid Resection for Isolated Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To investigate the radiographic and clinical results of arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection for isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) osteoarthritis and analyze the radiographic parameters associated with the functional outcomes.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2014, 17 wrists with symptomatic isolated STT osteoarthritis without carpal deformity underwent arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection. We evaluated visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, grip strength, pinch strength, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores before surgery and at the final follow-up. We analyzed correlations between the resection height and the radiographic and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 42 months. The average VAS score improved from 6.1 ± 2.3 before surgery to 1.7 ± 1.9 after surgery. The average grip strength improved from 18 ± 6 to 19 ± 9 kg, pinch strength from 2.5 ± 1.1 to 4.4 ± 1.7 kg, and PRWE score from 52 ± 23 to 32 ± 24. Carpal deformity (C-L angle of > 15°) was seen in 2 patients at the final follow-up. The deformity was more likely to occur when the resection height was greater than 3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection alone can reduce pain and improve functional outcomes for early to mid-stage isolated STT osteoarthritis in patients without dorsal intercalated segment instability deformity. Resection of greater than 3 mm of the distal scaphoid may result in carpal malalignment.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The Effect of Lunate Morphology in Carpal Disorders: Review of the Literature

Variation in lunate morphology can exist based on the absence (Type I) or presence (Type II) of medial facet on the distal articular surface of the lunate that contacts the proximal pole of the hamate. This additional lunatohamate articulation can affect load transmission across the radiocarpal joint and exert an influence on carpal kinematics. A Type II lunate is protective against carpal instability patterns associated with scaphoid nonunions and scapholunate dissociations. It may also play a role in the progression of carpal collapse that occurs in Kienböck disease. This review summarizes the effect of lunate morphology in the outcomes of non-operative and operative treatment of carpal disorders.

Distal Pole Resection of the Scaphoid for the Treatment of Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Distal pole resection of the scaphoid is one of the surgical techniques applied for the treatment of painful scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis (STT-OA).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we evaluated midterm outcomes in a consecutive series of patients who underwent distal pole resection of the scaphoid: 13 patients (15 wrists) with a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. We examined objective functional and patient-reported outcome measures. In addition, we assessed the degree of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

All patients scored within a normal range on objective functional and patient-reported outcome measures. We observed a mild postoperative DISI deformity with an average lunocapitate angle of 22° (range, 0°-44°), which did not correlate with pain scores. In the opposite wrists, with and without STT-OA, the average lunocapitate angle was 6° (range, 0°-20°).

CONCLUSIONS

According to this study, midterm results for distal pole resection of the scaphoid are satisfactory.

Surgical Strategy for Scaphoid Nonunion Treatment

Scaphoid fracture is the most common carpal fracture. Nonunion rate has been reported around 10 to 15% of scaphoid fractures. Risk factors for scaphoid nonunion are known as location, displacement, poor vascularity, time to treatment etc. The goals of surgical treatment for scaphoid nonunion are to achieve bony union, to correct carpal deformities and also to prevent progressive carpal instability and arthritis. Scaphoid nonunion can cause scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) which is a pattern of progressive degenerative radiocarpal and midcarpal arthritis secondary to posttraumatic pathomechanics of the scapholunate joint. Achieving bony union is essential to prevent carpal collapse or arthritis. To improve bony union, many surgical procedures including various forms of bone grafting have been developed and attempted. However, there is a controversy about which procedure is the most effective. In this review, we provide an overview of surgical treatment methods for scaphoid nonunion and discuss proper surgical strategies for scaphoid nonunion which requires surgical management.

Scaphoid Fractures: Nonunion and Malunion

The treatment of scaphoid nonunion and malunions has undergone a considerable transition since the 1960 modification of Matti's technique by Russe.¹ We present a review of articles with clear data on union rates and functional status to review the current methods of treatment for scaphoid nonunion and malunion.