Comparison of Flexor Tendon Suture Techniques Including 1 Using 10 Strands

Reoperation Following Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair

BACKGROUND

The goal of zone II flexor tendon surgery is to perform a repair with sufficient strength to withstand the forces encountered during rehabilitation. Postoperative rerupture and adhesion formation may lead to reoperation. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with reoperation after primary zone II flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, a total of 252 fingers in 201 patients underwent zone II flexor tendon repair. A medical record review was performed to collect data regarding patient demographics, injury and treatment characteristics and postoperative complications including reoperation. Reoperation was defined as any unplanned surgical procedure performed after initial flexor tendon repair.

RESULTS

There were 49 fingers (19%) in 42 patients that underwent reoperation at a median of 5.5 (interquartile range: 2.8-7.9) months. Older age, workers' compensation, and a Kessler-type repair of the flexor digitorum profundus were independently associated with reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro studies suggest that Kessler-type repairs are inferior compared with other suture configurations. Our study demonstrates a clinical correlation to these biomechanical studies. Our results suggest that Kessler-type repairs are inferior compared with non-Kessler-type repairs, due to postoperative complications requiring secondary surgeries.

The Transosseous Internal Four Strand Technique: A New All-Inside Technique for Zone 1 Flexor Tendon Repairs

BACKGROUND

Multiple techniques for the repair of flexor tendon injuries in zone 1 have been proposed over time. While pull-out suture techniques and bone anchor seem to be stronger than internal suture techniques, they are associated with a higher complication rate. We therefore developed an alternative internal suture repair with similar biomechanical stability to those of pull-out sutures and bone anchors.

METHODS

Twenty porcine distal phalanges and deep flexor tendons were randomized to 2 groups of 10 each. The tendons were transsected at the level of the distal interphalangeal joint. In group 1, repairs were performed with a well-established intraosseous suture repair and in group 2 with our new multistrand technique. The repairs were biomechanically tested with linear distraction until failure.

RESULTS

We recorded a significantly higher 2-mm gap force (2GF)-and thus higher stability-of the repairs in group 1 in comparison to group 2. With a 2GF of more than 50 N, our suture technique allows for a modern early active motion rehabilitation protocol. Breakage of the suture construct occurred at random places in the repair in both groups. No pull-outs were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a strong transosseous multistrand repair technique for flexor tendon repair in zone 1 that is simple and fast to perform and should have enough strength to withstand early active motion rehabilitation.

Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand

BACKGROUND

Various rehabilitation treatments may be offered following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Rehabilitation often includes a combination of an exercise regimen and an orthosis, plus other rehabilitation treatments, usually delivered together. The effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of different rehabilitation interventions after surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, Embase, two additional databases and two international trials registries, unrestricted by language. The last date of searches was 11 August 2020. We checked the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared any postoperative rehabilitation intervention with no intervention, control, placebo, or another postoperative rehabilitation intervention in individuals who have had surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Trials comparing different mobilisation regimens either with another mobilisation regimen or with a control were the main comparisons of interest. Our main outcomes of interest were patient-reported function, active range of motion of the fingers, and number of participants experiencing an adverse event.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the quality of the body of evidence for primary outcomes using the GRADE approach, according to standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs and one quasi-RCT, with a total of 1108 participants, mainly adults. Overall, the participants were aged between 7 and 72 years, and 74% were male. Studies mainly focused on flexor tendon injuries in zone II. The 17 studies were heterogeneous with respect to the types of rehabilitation treatments provided, intensity, duration of treatment and the treatment setting. Each trial tested one of 14 comparisons, eight of which were of different exercise regimens. The other trials examined the timing of return to unrestricted functional activities after surgery (one study); the use of external devices applied to the participant to facilitate mobilisation, such as an exoskeleton (one study) or continuous passive motion device (one study); modalities such as laser therapy (two studies) or ultrasound therapy (one study); and a motor imagery treatment (one study). No trials tested different types of orthoses; different orthosis wearing regimens, including duration; different timings for commencing mobilisation; different types of scar management; or different timings for commencing strengthening. Trials were generally at high risk of bias for one or more domains, including lack of blinding, incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting. Data pooling was limited to tendon rupture data in a three trial comparison. We rated the evidence available for all reported outcomes of all comparisons as very low-certainty evidence, which means that we have very little confidence in the estimates of effect. We present the findings from three exercise regimen comparisons, as these are commonly used in clinical current practice. Early active flexion plus controlled passive exercise regimen versus early controlled passive exercise regimen (modified Kleinert protocol) was compared in one trial of 53 participants with mainly zone II flexor tendon repairs. There is very low-certainty evidence of no clinically important difference between the two groups in patient-rated function or active finger range of motion at 6 or 12 months follow-up. There is very low-certainty evidence of little between-group difference in adverse events: there were 15 overall. All three tendon ruptures underwent secondary surgery. An active exercise regimen versus an immobilisation regimen for three weeks was compared in one trial reporting data for 84 participants with zone II flexor tendon repairs. The trial did not report on self-rated function, on range of movement during three to six months or numbers of participants experiencing adverse events. The very low-certainty evidence for poor (under one-quarter that of normal) range of finger movement at one to three years follow-up means we are uncertain of the finding of zero cases in the active group versus seven cases in the immobilisation regimen. The same uncertainty applies to the finding of little difference between the two groups in adverse events (5 tendon ruptures in the active group versus 10 probable scar adhesion in the immobilisation group) indicated for surgery. Place and hold exercise regimen performed within an orthosis versus a controlled passive regimen using rubber band traction was compared in three heterogeneous trials, which reported data for a maximum of 194 participants, with mainly zone II flexor tendon repairs. The trials did not report on range of movement during three to six months, or numbers of participants experiencing adverse events. There was very low-certainty evidence of no difference in self-rated function using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) functional assessment between the two groups at six months (one trial) or at 12 months (one trial). There is very low-certainty evidence from one trial of greater active finger range of motion at 12 months after place and hold. Secondary surgery data were not available; however, all seven recorded tendon ruptures would have required surgery. All the evidence for the other five exercise comparisons as well as those of the other six comparisons made by the included studies was incomplete and, where available, of very low-certainty.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of evidence from RCTs on most of the rehabilitation interventions used following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand. The limited and very low-certainty evidence for all 14 comparisons examined in the 17 included studies means that we have very little confidence in the estimates of effect for all outcomes for which data were available for these comparisons. The dearth of evidence identified in this review points to the urgent need for sufficiently powered RCTs that examine key questions relating to the rehabilitation of these injuries. A consensus approach identifying these and establishing minimum study conduct and reporting criteria will be valuable. Our suggestions for future research are detailed in the review.

A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, a novel single knot tenorrhaphy was developed by combining the modified Kessler flexor tendon suture (MK) with the loop lock technique.

METHODS

A total of 48 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were collected and randomly divided into six groups. The tendons were transversely cut and then repaired using six different techniques, the MK method, double knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (DK), and single knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (SK), each in combination with the epitendinous suture (P), and the same three techniques without P. Furthermore, by performing the load-to-failure tests, the biomechanical properties and the time taken to complete a repair, for each tenorrhaphy, were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared to the MK+P method, DK+P was more improved, thereby enhancing the ultimate tensile strength. The SK+P method, which required fewer knots than DK+P, was easier to perform. Moreover, the SK+P repair increased the force at a 2-mm gap formation, while requiring lesser knots than DK+P.

CONCLUSION

As opposed to the traditional MK+P method, the SK+P method was improved and exhibited better biomechanical properties, which may facilitate early mobilization after the repair.

Biomechanical analysis of a new 8-strand technique for flexor tendon repair

We sought to compare the strength and rupture sites of a new 8-strand suture technique with those of an established 6-strand flexor tendon repair through biomechanical analysis. This new 8-strand suture pattern places minimal suture material in the remodeling zone and focuses on protecting the knot, a well-known weak point of the suture construct. The knot was buried within the tendon so as to not interfere with tendon gliding. In a biomechanical simulation, strength and rupture sites were compared with those of the 6-strand repair. We repaired a total of 54 porcine flexor tendons using one of the two techniques (n=27 each). Tensile strength at 2-mm gap formation and ultimate failure load were determined. Afterwards, we dissected the tendons to identify the rupture site of the suture material. The new 8-strand suture had a significant higher ultimate load to failure (87.7N) and 2-mm gap load (71.6N) compared to the 6-strand technique (57.7N and 45.9N) (P<0.001). Whereas the rupture site of the core suture in the 6-strand technique was mainly located next to the knot (81.5%), the suture seemed to fail independently from this weak spot in the 8-strand technique (11.1%). This new 8-strand technique achieves a strong flexor tendon repair in a biomechanical model. Additional cross-locking on either side of the knot seems to contribute to the repair's strength. The resulting higher ultimate failure load and 2-mm gap load may allow more aggressive active motion-based postoperative rehabilitation.

Reconstruction and repair of atraumatic extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid wrists: Less extension lag after direct repair than interposition tendon grafting

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of extensor tendon repair involving the original stump in atraumatic extensor tendon rupture of rheumatoid wrists. For this study, 16 cases were reviewed involving 14 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 52 ruptured tendons impacted 36 fingers; 51 tendons were repaired in 35 fingers. The ruptured tendon stumps were repaired either directly by end-to-end suture or by free interposition tendon graft. The 8- to 10-strand core suture method was used for direct repair with a looped 4-0 nylon suture. In all patients, the extensor retinaculum was released and repaired under the tendons. Postoperatively, a volar splint with the wrist and fingers extended was applied for 3 to 4 weeks, followed by a removable splint and gentle active flexion until 6 weeks. The mean follow-up period was 32 months. All fingers recovered active metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint extension, including independent and active extension of the little finger. Overall, the mean extension lag at the MCP joint was 1.7°. The mean fingertip-to-palm distance with the MCP joint flexed was 0.24mm. The mean extension lag at the MCP joint was significantly greater after interposition tendon grafting (3.2°) than after direct repair (0°). There was no significant difference in the mean fingertip-to-palm distance between direct repair (0.38mm) and interposition tendon grafting (0.13mm). No re-rupture or additional extensor tendon rupture was observed. Repair of the original extensor tendon stump yields satisfactory outcomes and appears to be a viable alternative to tendon transfers in patients with rheumatoid wrists with atraumatic extensor tendon ruptures. Direct repair reduces postoperative extension lag without a significant difference in flexion deficit when compared with interposition tendon grafting.

Effects of a Q Suture Technique on Resistance to Gap Formation and Tensile Strength of Repaired Tendons: An Ex Vivo Mechanical Study

PURPOSE

The repair of digital flexor tendons following laceration should aim to prevent gapping at the repair site and restore the tensile strength of the tendons to facilitate postoperative movement. We present here a simple Q suture and test its effects on gap formation and tensile strength of the repaired tendons.

METHODS

Sixty porcine tendons were repaired with 3 2-strand sutures (Kessler, Kessler plus 2Q, and Kessler plus running sutures) and 3 4-strand sutures (double Kessler, double Kessler plus 2Q, and double Kessler plus running sutures). The specimens were subjected to a cyclic loading. At each cycle, the number of tendons that initiated gapping or formed a 2-mm gap at the repair site was determined. After the cyclic load testing, the gap distance between tendon ends and the ultimate strength of the repaired tendons was measured.

RESULTS

In both 2-strand and 4-strand tendon repairs, augmentation by insertion of the 2Q sutures reduced the number of tendons that showed 2-mm gaps ends during loading. Compared with the single Kessler and Kessler plus running sutures, Kessler plus 2Q suture significantly increased the ultimate strength of the tendon repair. Compared with the double Kessler and double Kessler plus running sutures, double Kessler plus 2Q suture significantly decreased the gap distance at the repair site after cyclic loading.

CONCLUSIONS

The Q suture technique effectively enhances the resistance to gap formation of 2-strand and 4-stand tendon repair. It also improves the tensile strength of 2-strand Kessler repairs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The Q suture is a simple technique that can resist gap formation and strengthen the tensile strength of the repaired tendons in the laboratory setting.

Biomechanical Analysis of Barbed Suture in Flexor Tendon Repair versus Conventional Method: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The barbed suture technique uses newly developed materials for flexor tendon repair. In this study, the authors examine the effectiveness of using barbed sutures in flexor tendon repair compared with conventional methods.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Barbed suture and conventional suture methods were extracted as predictor variables, and maximum force, gap formation force, and cross-sectional area were extracted as outcome variables. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the source of suture materials and the number of strands. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 86 publications. After screening, 12 articles were selected for review. Barbed sutures are comparable in effectiveness to conventional methods in terms of maximum force, gap formation force, and cross-sectional area. In the subgroup analysis, barbed sutures also have comparable effects to conventional methods in terms of maximum force and gap formation force.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' meta-analysis found that the use of barbed sutures in flexor tendon repair was competitive compared to conventional methods in terms of maximum force and gap formation force. Long-term in vivo studies are needed to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand

INTRODUCTION

Flexor tendon injuries are underestimated considering their anatomical function in the hand. According to the publications of Kleinert, Verdan and Kessler, primary suturing of the flexor tendon combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of "Early Passive Movement" became the standard form of therapy following acute flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a study between 2007 and 2009, a total of 115 flexor tendon injuries were analysed retrospectively. All patients were treated using a two-strand repair technique according to Zechner. They received physiotherapy from the first postoperative day according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol. For statistical purposes, the factors: age, gender, range of motion (ROM), follow up interval, affected flexor tendon and zone were analysed. The time between injury and surgery was also determined, classified into groups and included in the study. On the basis of the range of motion AROM, the Buck-Gramcko and modified Strickland Score was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up interval was 7 months. Using the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score an "excellent" overall result was achieved. Complications occurred in 3.5 %, one secondary rupture (0.9 %), two tendon adhaesions requiring tenolysis (1.7 %) and one case of infection (0.9 %). The time interval between injury and operation, gender, affected zone, flexor tendon and affected finger nerve had no influence on the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Zechner's core suture technique as the primary treatment, combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of "Early Passive Movement" according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation programme, an excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate was acchieved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV: case series.