Functional Outcomes of the Aptis-Scheker Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement in Patients Under 40 Years Old

Combined semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty and radial head arthroplasty for severe, concomitant rheumatoid disease of the wrist and elbow joints

Semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty with Aptis-Scheker implant has demonstrated excellent results in patients with end-stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the wrist. However, clinical success of the Scheker implant in restoring range of motion may be limited in patients with concomitant degenerative disease at the proximal radioulnar joint and radiocapitellar joint, which work in tandem with the DRUJ to allow pronosupination of the forearm. Among treatment options for elbow arthritis, standalone radial head arthroplasty remains poorly studied in the context of RA, despite being used widely in trauma patients. Here, we illustrate the surgical technique for combined total DRUJ arthroplasty with a Scheker implant and radial head arthroplasty to treat long-standing, refractory RA, at the wrist and elbow joints, with excellent results at 1-year follow-up.

Periprosthetic Ulna Fractures Following Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: A Series of Four Cases

Purpose

This case series presents four cases of periprosthetic ulna fractures following Aptis distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty to elucidate clinical characteristics, contributing factors, management challenges, and short-term outcomes following this rare complication and to propose prevention and optimal treatment strategies.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 239 Aptis DRUJ prostheses implanted between 2012 and 2022 at a single institution. We identified four cases of periprosthetic ulna fractures and assessed demographics, surgical indications, time to fracture, mechanism of injury, radiographic findings, treatment modalities, associated complications, and outcomes.

Results

The incidence of periprosthetic ulna fractures was 1.7%. All patients had prior surgery on the same extremity. Fractures occurred within 11 months of DRUJ arthroplasty, with varied mechanisms of injury, including one after a fall, another with heavy lifting, and the remaining two unprovoked. Postoperative radiographs revealed eccentric stem position and endosteal impingement in all cases. According to the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic fractures, three were classified as B1 type, and one was B2 type at diagnosis. Open reduction and internal fixation reliably achieved union at an average of 7 months with acceptable function.

Conclusion

Intraoperative technical pitfalls may contribute to periprosthetic ulna fractures during the early postoperative period. Consideration should also be given to anatomical variations and ulna shaft morphometry. Nonsurgical treatment yielded unsatisfactory results, whereas fractures without gross stem loosening treated with open reduction and internal fixation and autologous bone grafting resulted in reliable fracture union, suggesting a limited role for conservative treatment. Based on principles of periprosthetic fracture treatment in other locations, fractures with gross stem loosening may be best managed with implant exchange, with or without supplemental open reduction and internal fixation; however, more evidence is needed to guide the treatment of this rare complication of DRUJ arthroplasty.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Early Results in Total Replacement of the Distal Radioulnar Joint

BACKGROUND

Pathology of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) including instability and arthritis presents a challenge for hand and upper extremity surgeons. Surgical options include a Darrach procedure and similar resections, soft tissue interposition arthroplasty, and a one-bone forearm. In 2005, a prosthesis for DRUJ arthroplasty was approved for use in the United States. The authors hypothesize that DRUJ arthroplasty will lead to improved pain and range of motion (ROM) with a moderate, but manageable, complication rate.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 46 patients who underwent DRUJ arthroplasty by a single private group of hand surgeons was performed. Demographics, complications, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), and postoperative ROM were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 60 weeks. The implant was used both as primary surgical treatment for DRUJ pathology and as salvage for previous failed procedures. Twenty-two percent of patients experienced complications: 15% required revision surgery. No patients were converted to another type of implant, including those who underwent revision surgery. Prominent hardware was the most common indication requiring revision. Patients achieved an improvement in supination of 17° and extension of 5°. They additionally achieved a decrease in average VAS score from 7.1 to 2.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty reduces pain and improves ROM in patients with DRUJ pathology with a 22% complication rate. This cohort demonstrates improved pain, modest improvement in ROM, but a 22% complication rate for this implant. Further long-term studies are encouraged.

Long-term results of the AptisTM total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis after previous failed surgical procedures

We present a prospective study with the results of ten Aptis total distal radioulnar joint replacements in patients who had one to five previous operations. The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.7 years (range 3-14.7). The mean postoperative range of motion of the wrist improved by 9° for extension, 15° for flexion, 10° for pronation and 14° for supination, achieving values equivalent to 88%, 78%, 97% and 88% of those of the non-operated hand. There were minimal changes in radial and ulnar deviations. Grip strength improved by 7 kg, pain decreased by 8 points, QuickDASH and Mayo wrist scores improved by 51 and 53 points, respectively. Two implants had radiolucency less than 1 mm. Serum titanium ion levels were slightly elevated in two patients. Three prostheses required revision surgery for heterotopic ossification, a prominent radial screw and a periprosthetic fracture. No prostheses were removed. Six patients returned to their former professional activities and four patients adapted their jobs.Level of evidence: IV.

Replacement of the distal radio-ulnar joint with a semi-constrained Scheker DRUJ prosthesis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the indications, operative technique, and long-term outcomes of patients treated with the Scheker (Aptis) distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) prosthesis.

INDICATIONS

The Scheker prosthesis is intended to replace the DRUJ in patients with rheumatoid, degenerative, or posttraumatic arthritis of the sigmoid notch and/or ulnar head, or in cases of gross instability of the DRUJ. Moreover, a Scheker prosthesis can be used to treat failed salvage procedures, such as the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, ulnar head resection, and ulnar head arthroplasty.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Severe osteoporosis, active infection, immature skeleton, less than 14 cm of the proximal ulna remaining.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

In supine position with the forearm in full pronation, an ulnar S‑shaped incision is made. The ulnar head is resected and the proximal part is brought to the palmar side to enable visualization of the sigmoid notch. Following preparation of the sigmoid notch and the proximal ulnar part of the radius, a radial plate is attached. When the position is verified with fluoroscopy, screw holes are drilled together with a separate hole for the radial peg. A metal stem is inserted in the ulnar shaft. A polymer ball is then slid on to a polished peg on top of the ulnar stem. This polymer ball is seated in the socket of the radial plate and fixed with a small metal cap. Radiographic images are made for confirmation of correct positioning and full pro- and supination is tested, after which the wound is closed.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

After 48 h of pressure bandages, patients are instructed to start with full range of motion and weight-bearing exercises under the guidance of a hand therapist. Weight-bearing is constrained to 10 kg.

RESULTS

We retrospectively assessed 50 Scheker prostheses in 48 patients treated between 2016 and 2021. The median age was 56 years (IQR: 50-65) and 30 (60%) were female. Median follow-up was 29 months (IQR: 12-48). The primary outcome was the PRWE score. The median PRWE score at the final follow-up was 23 (IQR: 4-52) for the operated side versus a median PRWE score of 5 (IQR: 0-25) for the non-operated side (p < 0.005). Six patients had a complication. Three patients developed extensor carpi ulnaris tendinitis with one patient requiring additional surgery. One patient developed a neuroma of the distal branch of the ulnar nerve that was surgically removed. One synovectomy was performed because of synovitis and one endoscopic ulnar release was performed because of hyperesthesia of the ulnar area. None of the prostheses had to be removed.

Performance of the Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Implant: A Clinical Case Series Including Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Kinematic Analysis

High complication rates and surgical revision rates following Aptis implant placement have been reported in the literature. This study evaluates the performance of the Aptis implant of twelve patients using four-dimensional kinematic analysis. The (mean) follow-up was 58 months. Wrist motion, grip strength, and kinematic analysis of both arms were used to investigate possible causes of the reported complications. In nine cases (75%), the proximal to distal translation of the distal radius along the ulnar axis in the affected forearm was too little or absent. Significant correlations were found between postoperative extension and translation of the distal radius along the ulnar axis and between the radial deviation and combined error. The four-dimensional kinematic analysis suggests that the current design of the implant could lead to limited restoration of the position of the forearm rotation axis and the translation of the radius along the ulnar axis.

Retrospective and Prospective Outcomes of Distal Radioulnar Joint Prosthesis Arthroplasty at a Single Center

Purpose

Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis can cause painful and limited motion of the forearm leading to decreased function. When conservative treatment options are exhausted, surgical treatments are the next step. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively and prospectively evaluate outcomes of Scheker DRUJ total arthroplasty at a single center and add to the limited data on this procedure.

Methods

In a retrospective and prospective cohort of 12 patients, 13 DRUJ prosthetics implanted from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated from a single center. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the procedure, including comparisons of preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and willingness to repeat the procedure. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, subjective grip strength, need for hardware revision, subsequent procedures, and postoperative complaints.

Results

Out of 12 patients that were at least 1-year after surgery from DRUJ arthroplasty, 1 was deceased at the time of final survey and 1 underwent bilateral DRUJ arthroplasty. Seven of 12 available patients were surveyed over the phone. On average, patient range of motion after surgery was 76° in each direction for pronation and supination. There was a clinically significant improvement in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and a statistically significant improvement in visual analog scale pain rating. Seventy-five percent of patients surveyed were satisfied with their outcomes and would undergo the surgery again. Only one patient required additional surgery, and there were no instances of hardware failure at an average follow-up of 40 months.

Conclusions

Our study has shown positive outcomes with decrease in pain, improvement in function via Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand evaluation, and subjective patient satisfaction, with a 100% prosthesis survival rate. The DRUJ arthroplasty prosthesis is a viable alternative to other DRUJ salvage procedures.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

Wrist and Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: Maximizing Results in Difficult Conditions

Traditional management of wrist arthritis consists of proximal row carpectomy, partial carpal fusions, or, in the event of pancarpal arthritis, total wrist fusion. Although proximal row carpectomy and partial wrist fusions preserve some motion at the wrist while relieving pain symptoms, the quality of results obtained from these procedures is not predictable or optimal in many instances. Management of hip, knee, ankle, and shoulder joints has evolved from arthrodesis to arthroplasty. The wrist joint is following the same pattern of evolution with the advent of reliable designs.

Twenty-Year Experience With Primary Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty From a Single Institution

PURPOSE

The use of implant arthroplasty in the distal radioulnar joint is increasing. Two main types of implants are commonly used, ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) and hemi or semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. The literature consists mainly of small patient series. The purpose of this study was to examine our long-term outcomes of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patient data were collected in a patient registry from 2000 to 2019. The follow-up included radiographic examination, physical examination, Mayo Wrist Scores, pain level, range of motion, and grip strength. Reoperations were recorded. The implants were a semi-constrained prosthesis and a metallic UHP. The mean age at surgery was 50 years. Patient demographics were similar, but the semi-constrained group had a higher preoperative percentage of instability (85 vs 52 percent). The median follow-up time was 30 months for the semi-constrained implants group and 102 months for the UHP group.

RESULTS

A total of 53 primary semi-constrained total joint arthroplasties and 102 UHPs were included. The grip strength and Mayo Wrist Score improved for both the implant groups. Pain reduced in 76% of the patients. Supination improved for the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty group. Lifting capacity was better in the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty patients. The unadjusted reoperation rate was 23% for the semi-constrained implants group and 34% for the UHP group. Twenty-two implants were bilateral; these had comparable results to unilateral implants. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated 94% survival rate for the semi-constrained implants group and 87% survival for the UHP group after 5 years. The risk factors associated with reoperation for the combined implant group included younger age at surgery, previous wrist surgery, ulnar shortening, and wrist fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty improved functional outcomes in both the implant groups, but reoperations were frequent. The semi-constrained implants group had better lifting capacity. The bilateral implants had comparable outcomes to the unilateral implants.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The distal radio ulnar joint: a journey of discovery and invention of the Aptis prosthesis

This article describes the journey the authors took in discovering a new distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. The beginning deals with the problems we can potentially create for patients when we blindly follow the literature without any critical thinking. By challenging the established thinking on the function of the forearm, a new way of looking at the distal radioulnar joint emerged. Through trial, error and a moment of desperation, a new solution was found that allow us to relive pain and improve function for our patients with distal radioulnar joint pathologies.

Outcomes following Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty in the Setting of Total or Partial Wrist Fusion

Purpose  To evaluate the functional outcome and complications following primary ulnar head or total distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty in patients who have a partial or total wrist fusion. Methods  We conducted a retrospective review of 33 primary DRUJ implants in 31 patients who had a partial or total wrist fusion. Follow-up time averaged 67 months. There were 11 partial and 22 total wrist fusions with 22 ulnar head prosthesis and 11 total DRUJ implants. The mean age of the patients was 49 years. Eighty-one percent had previous surgeries with an average number of 4.6 previous wrist procedures. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion (ROM), and post-operative complications were noted. Results  The pain scores improved in 67% of the patients. The Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly from a mean of 39 preoperatively to 51 postoperatively. The grip strength and pro-supination remained stable. The wrist ROM also remained stable in the patients with partial wrist fusions. During the follow-up period, 10 (30%) of the DRUJ implants were explanted, with a trend toward higher explantation rates in total wrist fusions with one in the partial fusion group and nine in the total wrist fusion group. Four of the explantations happened in the first postoperative year. Nineteen (61%) of the patients required a second surgery for a DRUJ implant-related complication; this rate was similar between the partial and total fusion groups. Conclusions  DRUJ replacement resulted in improved pain scores and Mayo wrist scores in the majority of patients; however, the combination of primary DRUJ arthroplasty and total wrist fusion was associated with high complication rates. Surgeons should be aware of the high complication rate seen with DRUJ arthroplasty when combined with total wrist fusion.

Midterm Functional Outcome of the Linked Semiconstrained Distal Radioulnar Joint Prosthesis

Background  A painful unstable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) can seriously compromise hand and wrist function. The semiconstrained prosthesis was developed to restore DRUJ function. To date, most outcome reports are coauthored by the designer. Questions  Does independent reporting confirm the promising results of the semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis? Are complication and failure rates acceptable? Patients and Methods  We evaluated patients with the semiconstrained DRUJ implant and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We monitored patient satisfaction and function with functionality questionnaires and measured wrist range of motion, grip, and key pinch strength. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, linear and logistic regression. Results  We included 41 patients with 42 implants. Mean follow-up was 46 months (range: 24-102 months). Eighty percent of wrist had undergone previous surgery. We found a mean pronation of 83 degrees (0-90 degrees), supination of 70 degrees (0-90 degrees), flexion of 42 degrees (0-90 degrees), extension of 49 degrees (0-90 degrees), ulnar deviation of 24 degrees (0-60 degrees), and radial deviation of 14 degrees (0-40 degrees). Grip and key pinch strength were 20.1 (1-50 kg) and 6 kg (1-12 kg), respectively. Average patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation score was 42.7 (0-95), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 38 (0-88), and visual analog scale score was 3.6 (0-8). We found a 43% complication rate (mostly minor: ulnar or radial tendinopathy, temporary hypoesthesia) with 24% reoperation and 92% prosthesis survival rate. Conclusion  The linked semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis has its value in the surgical treatment of DRUJ failure. Currently, most implants are used in secondary surgery and multioperated wrists. More research is required to assess the value of the DRUJ prosthesis as a primary procedure. Level of evidence  This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Salvage of Painful Porous Coated Stem Ulnar Head Prosthesis With Semiconstrained Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the functional outcome and complications after conversion from a painful and unstable ulnar head prosthesis to a semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 11 ulnar head prostheses in 10 patients with porous coated stems that were revised to semiconstrained prostheses. The median age of the patients was 47 years. The median number of wrist surgeries prior to conversion was 4 (range, 1-9). The median time from the ulnar head implant to the revision surgery was 47 months. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion, and complications and reoperations were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients reported moderate or severe pain before surgery, whereas 3 patients reported moderate pain after surgery. The Mayo Wrist Score improved considerably from a median of 50 before surgery to 65 after surgery. The grip strength and forearm pronation-supination showed no change following surgery. The median wrist flexion-extension range improved considerably. Follow-up was a median of 64 (range, 15-132) months after revision surgery. Removal of the ulnar head implant was described as difficult by the surgeons, except in 1 case where the implant was loose. Resection of bone from the distal ulna was often necessary. One patient needed a reoperation requiring prosthesis removal for aseptic loosening of the stem 5 years after revision. There were 2 nondisplaced periprosthetic fractures successfully treated with cast immobilization and 2 additional minor complications, 1 postoperative stitch abscess, and 1 extensor carpi ulnaris tendinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from an ulnar head implant to a semiconstrained prosthesis provided improved pain scores and function with a low reoperation rate in this patient series. Removal of an ulnar head prosthesis can be technically challenging, but it can be performed leaving enough bone stock for immediate implantation of a semiconstrained implant.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Complications of Scheker semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty in a low-volume unit

Semiconstrained arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) (Scheker prosthesis, Aptis Medical, Glenview, KY, USA) is a treatment option in case of irreparable destruction of the DRUJ. In our unit, a Scheker endoprosthesis was implanted in 5 wrists in 4 patients. 3/5 wrists (60%) in 3/4 patients (75%) underwent revision surgery. Reasons for revision surgery were implant loosening, periprosthetic fracture of the radius and suspicion of periprosthetic infection. Asymptomatic loosening of the screw of the radial head cover was detected in one wrist. Scheker arthroplasty is technically demanding. The prosthesis is prone to failure over the long term. Before implantation, all patients should be informed of the high risk of revision surgery.

Clinical and radiological results of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with the Aptis prosthesis

We report the results of the treatment of disorders of the distal radioulnar joint with the semi-constrained Aptis prosthesis. Nineteen patients were assessed at a mean follow-up of 7 years. All patients had been operated on previously at the wrist, forearm or elbow. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score had a mean value of 40, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score had a mean of 49 and the visual analogue scale for pain had a mean of 3.9. The mean ranges of pronation, supination, wrist flexion and wrist extension were 78°, 76°, 60° and 51°, respectively. The mean grip strength was 23 kg. Complications were noted in ten patients. Eighteen patients would undergo the operation again. The 10-year cumulative survival rate was 84%. The Aptis prosthesis may be a solution to treat patients in whom previous surgery at the distal radioulnar joint has failed.Level of evidence: IV.

Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Scheker Prosthesis (Aptis) Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a series of patients who underwent distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with more than a 23-month follow up. The quantitative outcome variables included the visual analog scale for pain; Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE); and Mayo wrist score. The range of motion, grip strength, torque, and lifting capacity were measured at final follow up and compared with that of the nonsurgical extremity. Complications related to the prosthesis were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (mean age 57 years) were assessed at an average 41-month follow up (23-73 months). Fifteen underwent prior hand, wrist, or elbow procedures. Four patients required 5 reoperations. The postoperative median visual analog scale pain score was 0.6 at rest and 2.1 with activity. The median postoperative DASH score was 26.7, PRWE 41, and Mayo wrist score was 65. Upon comparing the supination torque of the operative and intact sides, the operative side was found to average 87% of the intact side on a work simulator and 77% on the simulator's D-ring. Eight of 20 patients had lysis around the collar of the ulnar component (40%), as detected using radiography. Three of 21 (14%) radial plates were malpositioned, with 2 resulting in a fracture. The overall complication rate was 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty using the Scheker prosthesis demonstrated good patient pain scores and the restoration of supination strength. The collar lysis resulted in weaker supination and grip strength. Still, the patients experienced mild levels of pain and moderate disability. A moderate complication rate persisted, as reported by other authors. Accurate radial component placement is important.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Treatment Options for Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthritis: Balancing Functional Demand and Bony Resection

The distal radioulnar joint is a complex anatomic structure that allows for a combination of rotation and translation with extrinsic and intrinsic stabilizers that maintain stability through a delicate equilibrium. Traumatic, congenital, inflammatory, and degenerative processes can disturb this sensitive balance, resulting in distal radioulnar joint arthritis. We discuss the joint's anatomy and biomechanics and the clinical approach to the patient. We review the surgical treatment options, expected outcomes, and their shortcomings. Selecting the best surgical intervention often means choosing the procedure with the set of complications and limitations best suited for the specific patient.

Comparison of subjective outcomes of Darrach and Sauvé-Kapandji procedures at a minimum 2 years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

In distal radioulnar joint pathology, the literature regularly recommends reserving the Sauvé-Kapandji (SK) procedure to young patients and heavy manual workers, and the Darrach (D) procedure to older patients and rheumatic wrists. However, the SK procedure is more technically demanding and requires more proximal resection of the ulna, with greater risk of instability in the ulnar stump. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the SK procedure really does show superiority.

HYPOTHESIS

Subjective results are no better after the SK than the D procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy of the 101 operated cases (70 patients: 40 female, 30 male; mean age at surgery, 50.2 years [range, 16.4-87.2 years]) were assessed, at a minimum 24 months. Group D comprised 44 wrists, and group SK 26. Assessment was conducted by telephone interview for pain, ranges of flexion-extension and pronation-supination, strength, stump stability and satisfaction, and by mail for the QuickDASH questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 25 months to 17 years).

RESULTS

The surgical revision rate was significantly higher in SK (p=0.003). Results were comparable between groups for pain, strength, range of motion and satisfaction. Mean QuickDASH score was 45.5 in group D and 26.5 in group SK. Age-matched comparison found no significant differences on endpoints.

DISCUSSION

Subjective results after the SK procedure showed no superiority over the D procedure, despite group D patients having twice the rate of heavy manual work and sport activities. This non-difference casts doubt on the need to reserve the D procedure to elderly patients and the SK procedure to young patients and heavy manual workers, especially as the latter is more technically demanding and is associated with a higher rate of surgical revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

[The Painful Wrist]

The Painful Wrist Abstract. Wrist pain is a problem that can significantly limit patients in their daily activities. The causes are manifold, and treatment is often challenging. A systematic approach is therefore helpful in working up the correct diagnosis. This article aims to demonstrate a straightforward approach to the evaluation of wrist pain in adults.

Distal Radioulnar oint Prosthesis

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) prostheses have been available for many years and despite their superior outcomes compared to conventional DRUJ reconstructions in both short and long-term follow-ups, they have not become as popular as common hip and knee prostheses. In the current review article, at the first step, we discussed the applied anatomy and biomechanics of the DRUJ, and secondly, we classified DRUJ prostheses according to available literature, and reviewed different types of prostheses with their outcomes. Finally we proposed simple guidelines to help the surgeon to choose the appropriate DRUJ prosthesis.

Modification of matched distal ulnar resection for distal radio-ulnar joint arthropathy: Analysis of distal instability and radio-ulnar convergence

BACKGROUND

In palliative surgery on the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ), ulnar head resection and the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure are often followed by instability and radio-ulnar convergence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of the DRUJ after modified matched distal ulnar resection performed alone or with partial or complete wrist arthrodesis.

HYPOTHESIS

A modification of matched distal ulnar resection, consisting in reconstruction of the sixth compartment and dorsalisation of the extensor carpi ulnaris, minimises these complications, regardless of the cause and associated procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-centre retrospective study was conducted in 46 patients (50 wrists) who underwent modified matched distal ulnar resection. The 50 wrists fell into three groups: total wrist arthrodesis according to Millender, n=21 (TWA group); radius to proximal row arthrodesis, n=17 (RPRA group); and isolated matched distal ulnar resection, n=12 (IMDUR group). Seventy per cent of patients had rheumatoid arthritis. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic assessment, with an analysis of radio-ulnar convergence, DRUJ stability, and ulno-carpal impingement, as well as of ulnar translation of the carpus in the IMDUR group.

RESULTS

After the mean follow-up of 8.2±5.4 years, 62% of patients were pain-free, with a mean VAS pain score of 1.3±2.1, and 90% of patients said they would have the procedure again. Clinical and radiographic instability due to excessively proximal resection was noted in 2 (4%) wrists, of which 1 required repeat surgery. Ulno-carpal impingement due to excessively distal resection occurred in 2 (4%) wrists. No significant ulnar translation of the carpus was noted in the IMDUR group (DiBenedetto: 0.011±1.9). Range of motion was similar in the three groups (mean pronation=77±17°; and mean supination=79±8°) (p>0.05). Mean grip strength was 85±35% compared to the other side.

DISCUSSION

Our modification of matched distal ulnar resection minimises the complications specific of other ulnar head resection techniques or of the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, namely, radio-ulnar convergence and DRUJ instability.

LEVEL OF PROOF

IV; retrospective comparative study.

Acute Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: Evaluation and Treatment

This article reviews the anatomy and mechanics of pronation and supination (axial rotation) of the forearm through the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ). Injuries to the bones and/or ligaments of the forearm, wrist, or elbow can result in instability, pain, and limited rotation. Acute dislocations of the DRUJ commonly occur along with a fracture to the distal radius, radial metadiaphysis, or radial head. These injuries are all caused by high-energy trauma. Outcomes are predicated on anatomic reduction and restoration of stability to the DRUJ and PRUJ with or without ligamentous repair or reconstruction.

Ulnar Head or Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement, Isolated and Combined with Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Midterm Results

Purpose  Various implants have been described for ulnar head replacement (UHR) or for total replacement of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Many series are small and few reports on mid- or long-term results. This study is primarily aimed to report on the midterm results after ulnar head only and total DRUJ replacement using the uHead in the treatment of painful disorders of the DRUJ. The secondary aim of the study was to eventually assess the combination of UHR and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods  We included 20 consecutive patients in whom an UHR with the uHead was performed at our institution between February 2005 and March 2017. There were 6 men and 14 women with mean age of 59 years (range: 36-80 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range: 2-15 years). Data were recorded prospectively before operation and at follow-up examinations and entered in a registry. The patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and thereafter annually. In five cases, the uHead was implanted simultaneously with a Remotion TWA. In four cases, a Remotion TWA had been implanted previously. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of remaining free of revision. A nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for comparing data not normally distributed (qDASH [quick disabilities of the hand, shoulder, and arm] scores), and the paired parametric Student's t -test was used for normally distributed data (pain and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, range of motion, and grip strength). Significance was set at a p -value of less than 0.05. Results  Pain, grip strength, and the function improved significantly. Pain after surgery decreased with 50 points on the VAS score scale of 100, from 66 (mean), preoperatively (range: 16-97) to 16 (mean; range: 0-51), postoperatively, while grip strength nearly doubled from 12 KgF (mean; range: 4-22), before to 21 KgF (mean; range: 6-36), after the surgery. Patients function measured with qDASH scores improved from 56 (mean; range: 36-75), preoperatively to 19 (mean; range: 4-47), postoperatively. Wrist extension, flexion, and ulnar and radial deviation did not change to a clinically or statistically significant extend, neither did supination nor pronation improved after surgery. While three UHRs were revised early because of pain problems and/or unsatisfactory forearm rotation in two cases and infection in one, 17 had an uncomplicated postoperative course and these patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery at all the follow-ups. Due to limited number of cases, the calculation of significance in comparing combined cases with UHR only cases was abandoned. Conclusion  Ulnar head arthroplasty (uHead) showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength, and the function of the patients with a painful disability of the DRUJ, without impairment on mobility on the midterm follow-up. The overall implant survival over the time and the complication rate was acceptable.

Validity and Responsiveness of Forearm Strength Measurements in the Evaluation of Distal Radioulnar Joint Implant Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the responsiveness of forearm strength tests and to correlate the change to grip strength and a patient-reported outcome measure used for evaluation of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) implant arthroplasty.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 18 patients treated with Herbert (n = 12) and Scheker (n = 6) DRUJ implants. Patients who had undergone the various measurements of arm and grip strength both before surgery and after a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. Our primary aim was to compare the responsiveness of grip strength with our new methods for measuring forearm torque and lifting strength. The secondary aim was to correlate observed changes in strength measurements to change in a patient-reported outcome measure with use of the patient-reported wrist evaluation (PRWE). Measurements of grip strength, forearm torque, and lifting strength were performed with the Jamar dynamometer and the Kern and Baseline instruments. Preoperative values were compared with 1-year values.

RESULTS

Standardized response mean and effect size values were higher for forearm torque than for grip strength. Change in forearm torque and lifting strength had a moderate to strong correlation with change in PRWE. The correlation between grip strength and PRWE was weak.

CONCLUSIONS

Forearm torque measurements were better than grip strength in detecting changes after DRUJ arthroplasty. It also had a stronger correlation to patient-reported outcome, measured with the PRWE.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Forearm torque testing may add further information to the evaluation of DRUJ disorders and their treatments. These tests can provide quantifiable data on the patient's ability to perform various tasks requiring physical strength.

Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty for Paget's Disease of Bone

Background  Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and ulnocarpal pathology, such as ulnocarpal impaction, are relatively common causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain. We herein report a rare case of ulnocarpal impaction and DRUJ arthropathy due to Paget's disease of bone (PDB) in the ulna. Case Description  A 65-year-old, right-hand-dominant male was diagnosed with right-sided ulnocarpal impaction secondary to PDB. While diagnosing the cause of this patient's ulnar wrist pain was relatively straightforward, the management of his pain and symptoms was less so. After a thorough discussion with the patient regarding medical versus surgical management, and after presenting all available surgical options, he opted for a total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty (TDRUJA). At 3-year follow-up, his wrist is pain-free, has excellent functionality, near-normal motion, and he is highly satisfied. Literature Review  Currently, there are no specific recommendations for surgical management of PDB in the ulna, causing ulnocarpal impaction. While resection of the pathologically enlarged ulnar head (Darrach procedure) and the Suavé-Kapandji (SK) procedure are standard surgical treatment options, a major known disadvantage of these procedures is painful ulnar impingement syndrome. TDRUJA, a relatively new treatment option, provides good long-term outcomes with high patient satisfaction and protects from ulnar impingement. Clinical Relevance  Since recommendations are lacking for surgical management of PDB, we propose that the TDRUJA be considered as an effective surgical option for the management of PDB causing ulnocarpal impaction. Furthermore, this can reduce the incidence of ulnar impingement, especially for patients who have pathologically enlarged ulnas that are prone to impingement.

Long-term results after semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty: A focus on complications

Arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) using a semiconstrained DRUJ implant yields good outcomes according to the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the subjective, clinical and radiographic outcomes with a special focus on complications in nine patients with a mean follow-up of 6years and to compare them with our previously published 3-year follow-up results. No subjective or objective changes were seen between the 3-year and the 6-year follow-up. In the previous study, one implant loosening and two irritations of the superficial branch of the radial nerve occurred. We saw three complications that needed surgery in addition to the three complications already found 3years after surgery. One patient with a large ulna had loosening of the cemented ulnar stem and therefore the prosthesis was explanted. One patient had an allergic reaction to the metal alloy of the prosthesis, which also led to removal. One patient had an ulnar impaction syndrome caused by too-distal placement of the implant that needed revision. Prior studies reported low complication rates. In our study, six complications occurred in four out of nine patients, requiring reoperation including two revisions and two implant removals. A precise surgical technique is mandatory to avoid the otherwise frequent complications and potential implant failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Ulnar head replacement and sigmoid notch resurfacing arthroplasty with minimum 12-month follow-up

Our study aimed to report the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent partial ulnar head replacement and distal radial ulnar joint interposition arthroplasty. From 2012 to 2016, nine patients underwent this procedure with mean follow-up of 27 months (range 12-55). Seven of the nine patients had previously undergone surgical intervention on the ipsilateral wrist. The procedure resulted in substantial improvements in pain and function. Mayo Wrist Score improved from 37 preoperatively to 73 postoperatively, and six patients achieved a good or excellent outcome. Visual analogue pain scores decreased from 7 preoperatively to 1 postoperatively. Grip improved from 20 kg preoperatively to 30 kg postoperatively. There was no significant change in wrist range of motion. Two patients underwent revision surgery to improve wrist motion. We conclude that over short-term follow-up the procedure provides a feasible option for distal radial ulnar joint arthritis. Level of evidence: IV.

Intermediate Cuneiform Resurfacing Arthroplasty for Combined Defects of the Sigmoid Notch and the Lunate Fossa of the Distal Radius

Posttraumatic comminution and bone loss at the sigmoid notch and the lunate fossa of the distal radius result in substantial impairment. Established salvage methods do not meet the physical demands of young patients. Replacement of the articular cartilage is challenging owing to the loss of 2 articular surfaces in different planes and the lack of a defined autogenous source to replace them simultaneously. The use of an intermediate cuneiform osteoarticular autograft to reconstruct the sigmoid notch and the lunate fossa is a new surgical technique that restores joint congruity and stability while allowing early active motion. In this study, we report a cadaver study detailing the anatomy, the surgical technique, and the functional and radiographic outcomes of our index case. Unlike alternative salvage techniques, restoration of the articular surface of the sigmoid notch and the lunate fossa allows early active and stable forearm and radiocarpal joint motion.

Aseptic loosening of an APTIS distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty - Case report

Dysfunction of the distal radioulnar joint can cause significant pain and instability. The self-stabilizing APTIS distal radioulnar joint prosthesis is used as a solution for severe distal radioulnar joint pathologies. We present a case of a 60-year-old male, who received an APTIS distal radioulnar joint prosthesis which resulted in aseptic loosening within five years of the initial implantation. Infection, incorrect implantation, demographic differences and over-activity were all excluded as the source; therefore, mechanical aseptic loosening was concluded. Ultimately, two surgeries were required to resolve the patient's pain, which resulted in a one-bone forearm once the implant was extracted. The solution to a failed APTIS implant, a one bone forearm, is difficult and protracted, so every effort should be attempted to preserve distal ulna bone stock before resorting to the implantation of this device.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement in the Scarred Wrist

Background  Radiocarpal or midcarpal arthritis can occur simultaneously with arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), leading to functional impairment of the wrist. Treatment often involves wrist arthroplasty or arthrodesis, either with simultaneous or secondary procedures, addressing the DRUJ. Successful treatment of solitary DRUJ arthritis with DRUJ replacement has been reported. However, outcomes in patients with multiple prior wrist surgeries are lacking. Surgery in these wrists is challenging because surgical scarring and advanced bone deformities make implant positioning more difficult. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes in patients that underwent total wrist arthrodesis and DRUJ replacement after multiple prior wrist surgeries. Methods  We prospectively enrolled patients that underwent total wrist arthrodesis and replacement of the DRUJ, either simultaneously or during separate procedures from 1999 to 2012. We included 14 patients with a median age of 43 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-47). As objective outcomes range of motion, weight-bearing ability, grip strength, was measured. For the subjective outcomes, we used an analogue pain score and the disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand (DASH) scores. Results  At a median follow-up of 5.6 years (IQR: 3.2-7.1). The average DRUJ range of motion and weight lifting ability significantly improved. As for the subjective evaluations, postoperative pain scores improved significantly, as did the DASH scores. Four of the patients had a postoperative complication, including infection and heterotopic ossification, of which two required reoperations. Additionally, 5 patients developed pisotriquetral arthritis requiring, pisiform excision, triquetrum excision, or the combination of both. Conclusion  Distal radioulnar joint replacement with a semiconstrained prosthesis was an effective method to restore the function of the wrist and forearm. As the surgical anatomy and soft tissue envelope were compromised in these patients, additional surgical exposure is necessary, adding to the complexity in these patients. No radiographic loosening Level of Evidence  This is a therapeutic level IV study.

Complications of Semiconstrained Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The Aptis total distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) prosthesis is a semiconstrained implant designed for treatment of DRUJ arthritis and instability. The purpose of this study was to analyze short-term complications of this device.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing semiconstrained DRUJ arthroplasty from 2007 to 2015 at a single institution. Records were analyzed for complications and the need for subsequent surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Two senior hand surgeons at one institution performed 52 semiconstrained DRUJ arthroplasties over 8 years. Nineteen complications necessitating operative management occurred in 15 patients (29%). A total of 26 procedures were undertaken to address these complications. Complications included 4 periprosthetic fractures, 3 infections, 2 instances of aseptic loosening, 2 implant component failures, 1 instance of screw loosening, 3 neuromas requiring neurectomy, 2 instances of finger stiffness necessitating extensor tenolysis, and 2 cases of heterotopic ossification at the DRUJ. Three of the 52 implants were revised (6%) and 2 were explanted (4%); 3 of these (6%) were caused by deep infection.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited literature on outcomes of the semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis. Prior studies reported low complication rates, with 0% to 5% revisions. In the current clinical series, 29% of patients required further surgery for complications, the most common reasons for which were periprosthetic fracture and infection.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

[Endoprostheses of the distal radioulnar joint]

BACKGROUND

A stable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is mandatory for the rotation and load transmission in the forearm and wrist. Salvage procedures such as the Darrach operation, Bowers arthroplasty, and the Kapandji-Sauvé procedure include the potential risk of dynamic radioulnar instability and impingement, despite stabilizing techniques addressing the soft tissues.

PROSTHESES

In an attempt to stabilize the distal forearm mechanically following ulnar head resection, various endoprostheses have been developed to replace the ulnar head. These prostheses can be used for secondary treatment of persistent complaints and unsatisfactory results after ulnar head resection, but also in the primary treatment of osteoarthritis of the DRUJ. Based on promising results concerning improvement in pain, range of motion, and grip strength, with proper indications ulnar head prostheses should be considered as a valuable treatment option for osteoarthritis of the DRUJ.

Distal radio-ulnar implant arthroplasty: a systematic review

The use of implant arthroplasty in the hand and wrist is increasing, often with little evidence of outcomes in the literature. We therefore undertook a systematic review of the outcomes of distal radio-ulnar joint arthroplasties following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Papers were assessed for outcomes, implant survival and methodological quality. Fourteen papers assessed ulna head replacements. The implant survival rate was 93% at a mean follow-up of 45 months. One paper assessed a partial ulna head replacement. Fourteen papers assessed total distal radio-ulnar joint replacements; all but two used the Aptis prosthesis. These implants had a survival rate of 97% at a mean of 56 months. Complications rates were 28% in both groups, and many were major. Although these data are impressive, worldwide there are many more implants placed and not followed up. All studies were level IV and V studies with low Coleman scores. This systematic review demonstrates that implant arthroplasty for the distal radio-ulnar joint has produced acceptable results in small numbers of patients. Whilst these short term outcomes are encouraging, the indications should be carefully considered and there should be proper consideration of the potential for later failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Ulnar head replacement and sigmoid notch resurfacing arthroplasty with a lateral meniscal allograft: 'calamari procedure'

We report the outcomes of ulnar head replacement with concomitant resurfacing of the sigmoid notch with a lateral meniscal allograft that attempted to recreate the palmar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments in four patients. Patients' ranges of motion, grip strength, postoperative complications and radiographs were assessed. The mean follow-up was 20 (range 12-28) months. There was an increase in postoperative range of motion with an average increase in grip strength of 43% to the unaffected extremity. All patients experienced marked reduction in their postoperative pain. No patients reported symptoms of implant instability. Distal ulna implant arthroplasty with a lateral meniscal allograft gives favourable short-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review

A severely painful, dysfunctional, or destroyed distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) can be reconstructed by fusion, interposition of soft tissue, or by arthroplasty using prostheses.

The objective of this study was to review the literature on implants and evaluate their effectiveness in terms of pain relief, range of motion and longevity.

A search was carried out using protocols and well-defined criteria in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and by screening reference lists. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines.

Of the 27 publications reporting on nine different implants, we excluded reports with less than five cases and silastic replacements of the ulna head. Eighteen publications describing a total of five implants were selected for analysis. Nine of the publications were useful for the evaluation of implant longevity. Despite methodological shortcomings in many of the source documents, a summary estimate was possible.

It seems that DRUJ implants have good potential to improve function through pain reduction; an improvement was observed in 17 series, although it was significant in only seven series.

Instability is not uncommon with ulna head-only implants, but they cause fewer clinical problems and re-interventions than might be expected.

The risk of deep infection is small with the available implants.

Overall implant survival in papers with at least five years’ follow-up is 95%, with a slightly better longevity of 98% for the constrained implants.

Periprosthetic osteolysis/radiolucency is frequently reported. Its causes and consequences are not clarified.

Cite this article: Calcagni M, Giesen T. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:191-196. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160008.