The Unsalvageable Radial Head in Patients Aged 30 Years and Younger

The Long-Term Effects of Radial Head Excision for Mason Type 3 Radial Head Fracture

Background: Radial head fractures with comminution and displacement present challenges in achieving optimal treatment outcomes in the long term. This study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of radial head excision (RHE) in patients with Mason type 3 fractures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with a Mason type 3 radial head fracture who underwent primary RHE between January 2010 and January 2020. The primary outcome was the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Additionally, joint stability and arthritis, and the carrying angle were recorded for each patient. Results: In total, 61 patients (21; 34% female) with a follow-up range of 3-13 years were examined. The mean (SD) total MEPS was 91.8 (9.2). The results were excellent for 46, good for 12 and fair for 3 patients. A model of total MEPS adjusted for sex, age and follow-up time showed a significant effect of patient age on treatment success (p < 0.001). Thirteen patients (21%) showed elbow instability. Six individuals had increased valgus laxity. The mean carrying angle was 19° (range: 11°-27°) on the injured side and 9° (4°-15°) on the uninjured side, t(120) = 12.608, p < 0.001. Overall, 37 patients had degenerative changes in the operative elbow. Conclusions: Benefits of RHE persist for a long time with predominantly excellent elbow function and minimal complications. An increase in the carrying angle, joint instability and degenerative changes are to be expected. Patient age at the time of the surgery can affect treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Loose-fit vs. press-fit stems and risk for surgical reintervention following radial head arthroplasty: a US-based cohort study of 1575 patients

BACKGROUND

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is performed with increasing frequency for reconstruction of comminuted radial head fractures. Implants can be categorized by stem design, either loose fit or press fit. Currently, the RHA literature does not suggest one implant type is superior to another based on revision and reoperation rates, although most RHA outcome studies have small numbers of patients with few events to detect a difference. This study evaluated the association between stem design and risk of revision and reoperation after RHA.

METHODS

A total of 1575 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary RHA within a US-based health care system were identified (2009-2021). Revision following the index RHA was the primary outcome of interest; ipsilateral reoperation was a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the risk of outcomes by loose vs. press fit with the adjustment for race and ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, region, surgeon RHA volume, and simultaneous ipsilateral extremity procedures.

RESULTS

Of the 1575 RHAs, 681 (43.2%) received a loose-fit stem. The cumulative revision probability was 2.6% for loose fit and 3.5% for press fit. In adjusted analysis, we did not observe a difference in risk of revision (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-1.46) or reoperation (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.43-1.25). Additionally, there were no observed differences in risk of revision (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.28-1.38) or reoperation (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.48-1.71) in the patient subgroup who underwent additional procedures in the same extremity at the time of RHA.

CONCLUSION

In this large multicenter cohort of 1575 primary RHAs, we did not observe a difference in risk of revision or reoperation following RHA based on stem design. The choice between using an implant with a loose- or press-fit stem may be based more on surgeon familiarity, implant availability, cost, and ease of use.

Uncementing the status quo: systematic review of a loose-fit, polished stem radial head prosthesis shows stable clinical results in complex elbow injuries with a concomitant radial head fracture

INTRODUCTION

Selecting the optimal radial head prosthesis to treat radial head fractures, especially in the context of complex elbow injuries like terrible triad, Monteggia, and Essex Lopresti, can be challenging, as there is currently no consensus in the field that favors a particular design. This study investigated the safety and performance of a Polished Stem Radial Head Prosthesis (PS RHP) compared to other modern RHP designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to capture data on a Polished Stem Radial Head Prosthesis (PS RHP) and other Radial Head Prostheses (RHPs). Functional scores, range of motion, complications, and revisions were extracted from published literature and analyzed in parallel with the percentage of complex injuries. Comparison of functional outcomes between groups were based on minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs).

RESULTS

There were 16 articles reporting on 711 cases of the PS RHP and 23 articles reporting on 605 cases of other RHPs included in the systematic literature review. Functional scores and range of motion were similar amongst the groups. The PS RHP design achieved a comparable revision rate as other RHPs despite a higher number of terrible triad injuries. Notably, the PS RHP group showed a significantly lower rate of instability (1.0%) than other RHPs (3.4%) (p < 0.05). Other complication rates were similar amongst the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS RHP group had higher rates of terrible triads at baseline compared to the other RHPs group. Regardless of greater injury complexity, the clinical outcomes of the PS RHP group were favorable and resulted in a significantly lower rate of postoperative instability as compared to other RHPs.

A Unique Approach to Irreparable Radial Head Fracture Using an Osteochondral Plug: A Case Report

CASE

An 18-year-old male patient sustained a traumatic injury that resulted in the loss of approximately 50% of the radial head. Subsequently, reconstruction was performed by transplanting an osteochondral plug harvested from the lateral femoral condyle. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, the patient was pain-free and had a good range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Using a novel technique, an irreparable radial head fracture was reconstructed using an osteochondral plug from the lateral femoral condyle. Reconstruction with osteochondral plugs may be a treatment option for partial loss of the radial head.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Simple Versus Comminuted Radial Head Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Current teaching suggests that modified Mason type III and IV fractures of the radial head involving more than 3 fragments should be treated with radial head arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of simple (2 or fewer intra-articular pieces) versus comminuted (3 or more intra-articular pieces) radial head fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 35 patients with modified Mason type III and IV fractures treated with ORIF. For the purpose of our study, simple fractures were defined as having 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Comminuted fractures were defined as having 3 or more intra-articular fragments. The primary outcomes were Broberg and Morrey rating system and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. Reoperation rates and complications were also noted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 39.3 months. Thirteen patients had radial head fractures consisting of 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Twenty-two patients had radial head fractures consisting of 3 or more intra-articular fragments. Ages and follow-up times were similar in the 2 groups. Similar QuickDASH and Broberg and Morrey scores were seen when evaluating subgroups of 2, 3, and 4 fragment fractures. One patient from each group underwent revision surgery for symptomatic hardware.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, we found similar clinical outcome scores and reoperation rates between simple and comminuted radial head fractures treated with ORIF. Fractures with more than 3 intra-articular fragments can be considered for ORIF.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Mid-term outcome following radial head arthroplasty in acute trauma: risk factors for poor outcome

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of a single type of radial head implant in a large cohort of patients at mid-term follow-up and to determine the associated risk factors for inferior functional outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective follow-up assessment of 65 patients (33 women and 32 men; mean age, 53.3 years [range, 22-81 years]) who underwent radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for acute trauma between 2012 and 2018, after a minimum follow-up period of 3 years. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Mayo Modified Wrist Score were evaluated, and all available radiographs were analyzed. All complications and revision procedures were assessed. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome following RHA.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up period of 4.1 years (range, 3-9.4 years), the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 77.2 (standard deviation [SD], 18.9); mean Oxford Elbow Score, 32.0 (SD, 10.6); mean Mayo Modified Wrist Score, 74.6 (SD, 13.7); and mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 29.0 (SD, 21.2). Average range of motion measured 10° (SD, 15°) in extension, 125° (SD, 14°) in flexion, 81° (SD, 14°) in pronation, and 63° (SD, 24°) in supination. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 38.5% and 30.8%, respectively, with severe elbow stiffness being the most common reason for revision. Patient age >50 years, the use of an external fixator, the presence of accompanying medial collateral ligament injuries, and the development of higher-grade osteoarthritis were associated with a poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory medium-term outcomes can be achieved using a monopolar, long-stemmed RHA in patients with acute trauma. However, complication and revision rates are high, frequently leading to inferior outcome scores. Additionally, a higher patient age, the use of an external fixator, the presence of accompanying medial collateral ligament injuries, and the occurrence of higher-grade osteoarthritis were associated with a poor outcome; these factors should raise awareness by the treating trauma surgeon.

Clinical Results of Surgical Treatment for Comminuted Radial Head and Neck Fracture: Headless Compression Screws Versus Plate Fixation

Background

We surgically treated comminuted radial head and neck fractures using headless compression screws, including multiple screws for the radial head and a single oblique screw for the radial neck. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results for comminuted radial head and neck fractures between surgery using headless compression screws with a single oblique screw for the radial neck, our new procedure, and a plate system precontoured to the proximal radius.

Methods

This retrospective study included 23 patients (11 and 12 in the screw and plate groups, respectively). The fractures were type 3 according to the Mason-Johnston classification modified by Broberg and Morrey. Clinical outcomes analyzed included the motion range of the elbow and forearm, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and radiological assessments. In addition, postoperative complications were also investigated. The average follow-up was 18 months.

Results

The bone union was achieved in all the patients, and there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and radiological assessments except forearm supination (p = 0.02). Furthermore, additional surgical procedures were performed in one and five patients in the screw and plate groups, respectively (p = 0.16). Posterior nerve palsy was observed in two patients in the plate group. Complications were observed in one and six patients in the screw and plate groups, respectively (p = 0.07).

Conclusion

Both surgical procedures achieved good clinical and radiological outcomes with bone and ligament injury repair. The screw group had a greater range of forearm supination than the plate group.