1
|
Huddleston HP, Lavoie-Gagne O, Mehta N, Walsh JM, Fu MC, Forsythe B, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Yanke AB. PROMIS physical function and pain perform poorly psychometrically in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:5067-5076. [PMID: 37823904 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07535-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, floor and ceiling effects, and dimensionality of PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain compared to legacy patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. METHODS Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperatively, patients completed the IKDC, VR-12, Kujala, SF-12, KOOS JR, PROMIS PF and Pain surveys. Inter-survey convergence was assessed with Spearman correlations. Psychometric analysis included investigations of inter-survey convergent validity, intra-survey floor and ceiling effects, and Rasch analyses with person-item fit and iterative question elimination model fit testing. RESULTS A total of 76 patients (mean age: 22.6 ± 8.4 years) who completed preoperative surveys were included (compliance: 91.7-96.2%). Preoperatively, age was significantly associated with both PROMIS PF (coefficient: - 0.291, P = 0.005) and Pain scores (coefficient: 0.294, P = 0.002). PROMIS PF had a Very Good correlation with IKDC and PROMIS Pain had a Very Good correlation with KOOS JR. Other correlations ranged from Poor to Good. No significant floor or ceiling effects were observed for any PRO. On iterative question elimination Rasch modelling, only two questions from PROMIS PF remained after 6 rounds of elimination while PROMIS Pain had no questions remaining after 3 rounds of elimination. CONCLUSION Preoperative PROMIS PF and Pain provided only Fair to Good correlations with most legacy PROs. Although no significant floor and ceiling effects were observed, PROMIS PF and Pain did not perform well psychometrically in this population of patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. These results suggest PROMIS questionnaires should be used with caution in this population, especially if used in isolation, when discussing clinical expectations with patients. The authors recommend continued use of legacy PROs specific to assessment of patellar instability and function that have established validity in patellar instability populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailey P Huddleston
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Hospital for special surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ophelie Lavoie-Gagne
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Justin M Walsh
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Nikhil N Verma
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Adam B Yanke
- Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Esteban-González P, Sánchez-Romero EA, Villafañe JH. Analysis of the Active Measurement Systems of the Thoracic Range of Movements of the Spine: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:3042. [PMID: 35459026 PMCID: PMC9026805 DOI: 10.3390/s22083042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
(1) Objective: to analyze current active noninvasive measurement systems of the thoracic range of movements of the spine. (2) Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed that included observational or clinical trial studies published in English or Spanish, whose subjects were healthy human males or females ≥18 years of age with reported measurements of thoracic range of motion measured with an active system in either flexion, extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation. All studies that passed the screening had a low risk of bias and good methodological results, according to the PEDro and MINORS scales. The mean values and 95% confidence interval of the reported measures were calculated for different types of device groups. To calculate the differences between the type of device measures, studies were pooled for different types of device groups using Review Manager software. (3) Results: 48 studies were included in the review; all had scores higher than 7.5 over 10 on the PEDro and MINORs methodological rating scales, collecting a total of 2365 healthy subjects, 1053 males and 1312 females; they were 39.24 ± 20.64 years old and had 24.44 ± 3.81 kg/m2 body mass indexes on average. We summarized and analyzed a total of 11,892 measurements: 1298 of flexoextension, 1394 of flexion, 1021 of extension, 491 of side-to-side lateral flexion, 637 of right lateral flexion, 607 of left lateral flexion, 2170 of side-to-side rotation, 2152 of right rotation and 2122 of left rotation. (4) Conclusions: All collected and analyzed measurements of physiological movements of the dorsal spine had very disparate results from each other, the cause of the reason for such analysis is that the measurement protocols of the different types of measurement tools used in these measurements are different and cause measurement biases. To solve this, it is proposed to establish a standardized measurement protocol for all tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Esteban-González
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Vil-laviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eleuterio A. Sánchez-Romero
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Vil-laviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
- Musculoskeletal Pain and Motor Control Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Canarias, 38300 La Orotava, Canary Islands, Spain
- Musculoskeletal Pain and Motor Control Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Eu-ropea de Canarias, 38300 La Orotava, Canary Islands, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aldon-Villegas R, Ridao-Fernández C, Torres-Enamorado D, Chamorro-Moriana G. How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:845. [PMID: 34066777 PMCID: PMC8151204 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this review was to compile validated functional shoulder assessment tools and analyse the methodological quality of their validations. Secondarily, we aimed to provide a comparison of the tools, including parameter descriptions, indications/applications, languages and operating instructions, to choose the most suitable for future clinical and research approaches. A systematic review (PRISMA) was conducted using: PubMed, WoS Scopus, CINHAL, Dialnet and reference lists until 2020. The main criteria for inclusion were that papers were original studies of validated tools or validation studies. Pre-established tables showed tools, validations, items/components, etc. The QUADAS-2 and COSMIN-RB were used to assess the methodological quality of validations. Ultimately, 85 studies were selected, 32 tools and 111 validations. Risk of bias scored lower than applicability, and patient selection got the best scores (QUADAS-2). Internal consistency had the highest quality and PROMs development the lowest (COSMIN-RB). Responsiveness was the most analysed metric property. Modified UCLA and SST obtained the highest quality in shoulder instability surgery, and SPADI in pain. The most approached topic was activities of daily living (81%). We compiled 32 validated functional shoulder assessment tools, and conducted an analysis of the methodological quality of 111 validations associated with them. Modified UCLA and SST showed the highest methodological quality in instability surgery and SPADI in pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocio Aldon-Villegas
- Research Group “Area of Physiotherapy” CTS-305, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain; (R.A.-V.); (G.C.-M.)
| | - Carmen Ridao-Fernández
- Research Group “Area of Physiotherapy” CTS-305, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain; (R.A.-V.); (G.C.-M.)
| | - Dolores Torres-Enamorado
- Research Group “Women, Well-Being and Citizenship” SEJ066, Department of Nursing, University of Seville, 41930 Bormujos, Spain;
| | - Gema Chamorro-Moriana
- Research Group “Area of Physiotherapy” CTS-305, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain; (R.A.-V.); (G.C.-M.)
| |
Collapse
|