Vancomycin Mediates IgA Autoreactivity in Drug-Induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis

S2k guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of linear IgA dermatosis initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

INTRODUCTION

Linear IgA dermatosis (LAD) is a rare subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease (AIBD) defined by predominant or exclusive immune deposits of immunoglobulin A at the basement membrane zone of skin or mucous membranes. This disorder is a rare, clinically and immunologically heterogeneous disease occurring both in children and in adults. The aim of this project is to present the main clinical features of LAD, to propose a diagnostic algorithm and provide management guidelines based primarily on experts' opinion because of the lack of large methodologically sound clinical studies.

METHODS

These guidelines were initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force Autoimmune Bullous Diseases (AIBD). To achieve a broad consensus for these S2k consensus-based guidelines, a total of 29 experts from different countries, both European and non-European, including dermatologists, paediatric dermatologists and paediatricians were invited. All members of the guidelines committee agreed to develop consensus-based (S2k) guidelines. Prior to a first virtual consensus meeting, each of the invited authors elaborated a section of the present guidelines focusing on a selected topic, based on the relevant literature. All drafts were circulated among members of the writing group, and recommendations were discussed and voted during two hybrid consensus meetings.

RESULTS

The guidelines summarizes evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations (S2 level) on the diagnosis and treatment of LAD.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines will support dermatologists to improve their knowledge on the diagnosis and management of LAD.

Adult-onset linear IgA bullous dermatosis: a retrospective single-center cohort study of 81 patients and literature review

BACKGROUND

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare autoimmune blistering disorder that may be drug-induced or paraneoplastic. We aim to characterize features of LABD and determine differentiating factors among idiopathic, drug-induced, or malignancy-associated diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of adult patients with linear IgA bullous dermatosis at a large tertiary referral center and a literature review of adult linear IgA bullous dermatosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included in the study. Ten patients (12.3%) had comorbid malignancy and nine (11.1%) had inflammatory bowel disease. Median disease duration was significantly shorter in both drug-induced (1.2 vs. 48.8 months; P < 0.001) and malignancy-associated (1.7 vs. 48.8 months; P < 0.001) LABD compared with idiopathic LABD. Recurrent episodes occurred significantly more often in idiopathic LABD compared to those with drug-induced (76.1 vs. 11.5%; P < 0.001) or malignancy-associated disease (76.1 vs. 33.3%; P = 0.019). Time to diagnosis was significantly shorter in the drug-induced (0.2 vs. 5.4 months; P < 0.001) and malignancy-associated groups (0.7 vs. 5.4 months; P = 0.049) compared with idiopathic; similarly, time to improvement was significantly shorter in both drug-induced (0.4 vs. 3.0 months; P < 0.001) and malignancy-associated disease (1.1 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.016). Clinical morphology was indistinguishable between groups. Limitations included retrospective data collection, data from tertiary referral centers, and limited racial and ethnic diversity.

CONCLUSION

Screening for underlying malignancy, as well as for a predisposing medication or possibly inflammatory bowel disease, may be advisable in patients with LABD, particularly when it is newly diagnosed.

BioAct-Het: A Heterogeneous Siamese Neural Network for Bioactivity Prediction Using Novel Bioactivity Representation

Drug failure during experimental procedures due to low bioactivity presents a significant challenge. To mitigate this risk and enhance compound bioactivities, predicting bioactivity classes during lead optimization is essential. The existing studies on structure-activity relationships have highlighted the connection between the chemical structures of compounds and their bioactivity. However, these studies often overlook the intricate relationship between drugs and bioactivity, which encompasses multiple factors beyond the chemical structure alone. To address this issue, we propose the BioAct-Het model, employing a heterogeneous siamese neural network to model the complex relationship between drugs and bioactivity classes, bringing them into a unified latent space. In particular, we introduce a novel representation for the bioactivity classes, called Bio-Prof, and enhance the original bioactivity data sets to tackle data scarcity. These innovative approaches resulted in our model outperforming the previous ones. The evaluation of BioAct-Het is conducted through three distinct strategies: association-based, bioactivity class-based, and compound-based. The association-based strategy utilizes supervised learning classification, while the bioactivity class-based strategy adopts a retrospective study evaluation approach. On the other hand, the compound-based strategy demonstrates similarities to the concept of meta-learning. Furthermore, the model's effectiveness in addressing real-world problems is analyzed through a case study on the application of vancomycin and oseltamivir for COVID-19 treatment as well as molnupiravir's potential efficacy in treating COVID-19 patients. The data and code underlying this article are available on https://github.com/CBRC-lab/BioAct-Het. However, data sets were derived from sources in the public domain.

Diagnostic Techniques in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases

Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) comprise a heterogeneous group of uncommon disorders of the skin and mucous membranes, characterised by antibodies targeting structural proteins within epithelial tissue and the underlying basement membrane. There can be significant overlap in clinical presentation of these diseases and accurate diagnosis relies on the detection and characterisation of relevant autoantibodies. Immunofluorescence provides the gold-standard diagnostic tool for these diseases, identifying both tissue-bound autoantibodies in biopsy material using direct immunofluorescence and circulating antibodies in serum through indirect immunofluorescence. Following advances in the identification and subsequent characterisation of numerous antigenic targets in these diseases, the development of antigen-specific tests, in particular, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays on serum specimens, has provided a third key tool to not only identify, but also quantify AIBD autoantibodies. This quantification has proven particularly useful in monitoring disease activity and informing clinical management decisions. Accurate diagnosis of these diseases is important since optimal treatment strategies differ between them and, prognostically, some diagnoses are associated with an increased risk of malignancy. This review outlines the molecular pathology underlying the major AIBD and describes how the three principal techniques can be used in combination, to provide best practice for diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

Pemphigus and pemphigoids: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy

Pemphigus and pemphigoid are two potentially life-threatening groups of autoimmune diseases, characterized by autoantibodies targeting structural components of desmosomes or hemidesmosomes, respectively. Affected patients typically show itchy/painful plaques or blistering skin lesions and/or impairing mucosal blistering and erosions, which may strongly impact their quality of life. Since the milestone work of Walter Lever in 1953, who differentiated these two groups of diseases by histopathological analysis of the level of antibody-mediated skin cleavage, enormous progresses occurred. Achievements made in laboratory diagnostics now allow to identify antigen specific structural proteins of the skin that are targeted by pathogenic autoantibodies. These progresses were accompanied by an increased understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases thanks to the establishment of animal models reproducing disease and on studies on skin and blood of affected individuals, which have been leading to novel and disease-specific treatments. Yet, given their phenotypical overlap with more common dermatological diseases, correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment are often delayed, in some cases leading to irreversible sequelae, including organ dysfunction (i.e., loss of vision in mucous membrane pemphigoid). Here, we provide a concise overview of the clinical appearance, diagnosis and therapeutic management of pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases.

Pemphigus- und Pemphigoid-Erkrankungen: Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie: Pemphigus and pemphigoids: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy

Pemphigus und Pemphigoid sind seltene Autoimmunkrankheiten der Haut mit potenziell lebensbedrohlichem Verlauf. Autoantikörper gegen epidermale und junktionale Strukturproteine (Desmosomen sowie Hemidesmosomen) führen bei Betroffenen typischerweise zu juckenden, schmerzhaften Plaques oder Blasen an der Haut und/oder Blasenbildung und Erosionen der Schleimhäute mit möglicher Einschränkung der Lebensqualität. Seit der bahnbrechenden Arbeit von Walter Lever im Jahr 1953, dem es gelang, mittels histopathologischer Untersuchung diese beiden Krankheitsgruppen anhand des Musters der Antikörper‐vermittelten Blasenbildung zu differenzieren, wurden enorme Fortschritte im Verständnis der Erkrankungen erzielt. Die Errungenschaften in der Labordiagnostik ermöglichten die Identifikation von Zielstrukturen zur präzisen Unterscheidung verschiedener Varianten der bullösen Autoimmunerkrankungen. Diese Fortschritte gingen dank der Entwicklung von Tiermodellen mit einem besseren Verständnis der Pathogenese einher. Außerdem haben Studien an Haut und Blut betroffener Patienten zu neuen und krankheitsspezifischen Behandlungen geführt. Aufgrund ihrer Seltenheit und der klinischen Ähnlichkeit mit anderen dermatologischen Erkrankungen verzögern sich die korrekte Diagnosestellung und die Einleitung einer entsprechenden Therapie häufig, was in einigen Fällen zu irreversiblen Folgeerscheinungen, einschließlich Funktionsstörungen von Organen (zum Beispiel Verlust des Sehvermögens beim Schleimhautpemphigoid) führt. Wir geben hier einen Überblick über das klinische Erscheinungsbild, den Diagnosealgorithmus und das therapeutische Management von Pemphigus‐ und Pemphigoid‐Erkrankungen.

Case report: A case of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita with IgG and IgM anti-basement membrane zone antibodies relapsed after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination

We report a case of autoimmune bullous disease (AIBD) with IgG and IgM autoantibodies against epidermal basement membrane zone (BMZ), which showed recurrence of mucocutaneous lesions after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. A 20-year-old Japanese woman with a 4-year history of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) presented to our clinic. She noticed fever and rash on the same day and visited at our hospital 2 days later. Physical examination revealed blisters, erosions and erythema on the face, shoulder, back, upper arms, and lower lip. A skin biopsy from the forehead showed subepidermal blister. Direct immunofluorescence showed linear depositions of IgG, IgM, and C3c in the epidermal BMZ. By indirect immunofluorescence of 1M NaCl-split normal human skin, circulating IgG autoantibodies were bound to the dermal side of the split at 1:40 serum dilution, and circulating IgM antibodies were bound to the epidermal side of the spilt. After the increase of prednisolone dose to 15 mg/day, the mucocutaneous lesions resolved in a week. The present case is the first case of possible EBA with IgG and IgM anti-BMZ antibodies, in which the mucocutaneous lesions were recurred after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Clinicians should be aware that bullous pemphigoid-like AIBDs, including EBA and IgM pemphigoid, might be developed after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Linear Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Bullous Dermatosis Mimicking Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare autoimmune blistering disease characterized by linear IgA deposition along the dermo-epidermal junction on direct immunofluorescence (DIF). LABD appears clinically as erythematous polycyclic lesions in younger patients but can show considerable phenotypic heterogeneity in older patients, often leading to misdiagnoses such as bullous pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), or other bullous conditions. Cases of LABD mimicking SJS/TEN require prompt skin biopsies for histopathology and DIF for disease differentiation and medical decision-making. In cases of suspected drug-induced LABD or SJS/TEN, identification and removal of the offending agent are paramount. The preferred treatment for LABD is oral dapsone, while SJS/TEN may respond better to cyclosporine or a combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and systemic corticosteroids. This case highlights the rare occurrence of LABD mimicking SJS/TEN and emphasizes the details that clinicians must know to guide patient management.

Eosinophil-rich linear IgA bullous dermatosis induced by mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine

We present a case of eosinophil-rich linear IgA bullous disease (LABD) following the administration of a messenger RNA COVID-19 booster vaccine. A 66-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 3-week history of a pruritic blistering rash characterized by fluid-filled bullae and multiple annular and polycyclic plaques. He was initially diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid based on a biopsy showing a subepidermal blister with numerous eosinophils. However, direct immunofluorescence studies showed linear IgA and IgM deposition along the basement membrane zone with no immunoreactivity for C3 or IgG. Additionally, indirect immunofluorescence was positive for IgA basement membrane zone antibody. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with LABD and initiated on dapsone therapy with resolution of his lesions at 3-month follow-up. This case illustrates the growing number of autoimmune blistering adverse cutaneous reactions from vaccination. Dermatopathologists should be aware that features of autoimmune blistering diseases can overlap and may not be distinguishable based on these histopathological findings alone. Confirmation with direct immunofluorescence and/or serological studies may be necessary for accurate diagnosis.

Updates in the Diagnosis and Management of Linear IgA Disease: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Linear IgA disease (LAD) is a rare autoimmune blistering disease with linear IgA deposits along the basement membrane zone. Direct immunofluorescence remains the gold standard for diagnosis, but other diagnostic measures reported in recent literature have proven useful in the setting of inconclusive preliminary results. Dapsone is a commonly used treatment, but many therapeutic agents have emerged in recent years. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of updates on the diagnosis and management of LAD. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted from May to June of 2021 for articles published in the last 5 years that were related to the diagnosis and management of LAD. Results: False-negative results in cases of drug-induced LAD and the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies on immunofluorescence studies were reported. Serration pattern analysis has been reported to be useful in distinguishing LAD from sublamina densa-type LAD. Rituximab, omalizumab, etanercept, IVIg, sulfonamides, topical corticosteroids, and others have been used successfully in adult and pediatric patients with varying disease severity. Topical corticosteroids were preferred for pediatric patients while rituximab and IVIg were used in adults with recalcitrant LAD. Sulfonamides were utilized in places without access to dapsone. Conclusion: In cases where preliminary biopsy results are negative and clinical suspicion is high, repeat biopsy and additional diagnostic studies should be used. Patient factors such as age, medical comorbidities, and disease severity play a role in therapeutic selection.

Neutrophilic drug reactions

Neutrophilic drug reactions are unique eruptions that can affect hospitalized patients and share a common pathophysiology with neutrophils as the key mediators of inflammation. They range in clinical presentation from papules and plaques to bullae and erosions to pustules. Although there is some overlap in presentation, each has distinguishing features that aid the clinician in differentiation from one another and from other drug hypersensitivity reactions. Much of the data on these reactions are from case reports and series or retrospective review studies. There are limited prospective observational studies dedicated to these adverse drug reactions. We review the more common and life-threatening neutrophilic drug reactions, their proposed mechanism of action, and their management.

Bullous Diseases in Children: A Review of Clinical Features and Treatment Options

Bullous diseases are uncommon in children; however, as they have the potential to affect quality of life, occasionally have long-term side effects in the setting of scarring processes, and carry a rare risk of underlying malignancy [e.g., with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP)], knowledge of their clinical presentation and treatment options is essential. Given the rarity of these conditions, our current state of knowledge is largely derived from case reports and case series, with a paucity of evidence-based recommendations. In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation of and treatment options for linear immunoglobulin A disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, PNP, bullous pemphigoid, mucus membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and inherited epidermolysis bullosa. In general, when these conditions, except for PNP, occur in childhood, they have a better prognosis than when they occur in adults. Clinical, histopathological, and immunologic features frequently overlap, but distinct differences have also been reported, most commonly in clinical presentation. Treatment is often similar to that in adults, although specific considerations are necessary for a pediatric population.

An array of unusual clinical features in a woman with amlodipine-induced linear immunoglobulin A disease

Linear immunoglobulin A disease (LAD) is a rare, autoimmune, vesicular-bullous disease that is either idiopathic or drug-induced, most commonly by vancomycin and in rare instances by amlodipine. In drug-induced LAD, certain uncommon and atypical clinical features can occur. In our patient, a 49-year-old woman with amlodipine-induced LAD, atypical features such as koebnerization and palmo-plantar involvement occurred. She presented with tense, clear fluid-filled vesicles, bullae, and erosions all over her body, especially on the palms and soles, with some lesions showing a string-of-pearls appearance. The lesions were preceded by pruritus, and the patient had changed her anti-hypertensive medication from telmisartan to telmisartan-amlodipine for previous 10 days. Skin biopsy and direct immunofluorescence testing confirmed LAD. During the hospital stay, along with new crops of lesions, a few vesicles were present along the lines where she had scratched and the band of tight elastic sleeves of the sterile gown she wore, which is suggestive of koebnerization. Knowing the atypical manifestations of drug-induced LAD may aid clinicians in determining an early diagnosis, and LAD should be an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of vesiculobullous disease with palmar-plantar involvement. Amlodipine is a commonly used anti-hypertensive drug, so knowledge of its potential to cause this disease is important. Furthermore, knowing the potential for koebnerization, avoidance of trauma and the gentle handling of these patients can lead to early recovery from this self-limiting disease.

Drug-induced linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis: A French retrospective pharmacovigilance study of 69 cases

AIMS

Linear immunoglobin A (IgA) bullous dermatosis is a rare autoimmune dermatosis considered spontaneous or drug-induced (DILAD). We assessed all DILAD cases, determined the imputability score of drugs and highlighted suspected drugs.

METHODS

Data for patients with DILAD were collected retrospectively from the French Pharmacovigilance network (from 1985 to 2017) and from physicians involved in the Bullous Diseases French Study Group and the French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs. Drug causality was systematically determined by the French imputability method.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients, 42% had mucous membrane involvement, 20% lesions mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), 21% eosinophil infiltrates and 10% keratinocytes necrosis. Direct immunofluorescence, in 80%, showed isolated linear IgA deposits. Vancomycin (VCM) was suspected in 39 cases (57%), 11 had TEN-like lesions, as compared with three without VCM suspected. Among the 33 patients with a single suspected drug, 85% had an intrinsic imputability score of I4. Among them, enoxaparin, minocycline and vibramycin were previously unpublished. For all patients, the suspect drug was withdrawn; 15 did not receive any treatment. First-line therapy for 31 patients was topical steroids. Among the 60 patients with available follow-up, 52 achieved remission, 10 without treatment. Four patients experienced relapse, four died and five had positive accidental rechallenges.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no major clinical difference between DILAD and idiopathic linear IgA bullous dermatosis, but the former features a higher prevalence of patients mimicking TEN. VCM, suspected in more than half of the cases, might be responsible for more severe clinical presentations. We report three new putative drugs.

Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases

Autoimmune skin blistering diseases (AIBD) are characterized by autoantibodies that are directed against structural proteins in the skin and adjacent mucous membranes. Some clinical signs are typical for a specific AIBD, however, correct diagnosis requires the detection of tissue-bound or circulating autoantibodies. The gold standard for diagnosis of AIBD is the detection of autoantibodies or complement component 3 by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a perilesional biopsy. Circulating antibodies can be detected via indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy of different tissue substrates including human skin, monkey esophagus, and more recently, recombinant forms of the different target antigens. Latter are also employed in various commercial ELISA systems and by immunoblotting in in-house assays available in specialized laboratories. ELISA systems are also particularly valuable for monitoring of the disease activity during the disease course which can be helpful for treatment decisions. Exact diagnosis is essential for both treatment and prognosis, since some AIBD are associated with malign tumors such as paraneoplastic pemphigus and anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid. This review presents clinical and immunopathological features of AIBD for the state-of the art diagnosis of these disorders.