Development of inhibition ELISA to detect antibody-induced failure of botulinum toxin a therapy in cosmetic indications

Continuous Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA Despite Presence of BoNT/A Neutralizing Antibodies: Immunological Hypothesis and a Case Report

Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is a bacterial protein that has proven to be a valuable pharmaceutical in therapeutic indications and aesthetic medicine. One major concern is the formation of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) to the core BoNT/A protein. These can interfere with the therapy, resulting in partial or complete antibody (Ab)-mediated secondary non-response (SNR) or immunoresistance. If titers of nAbs reach a level high enough that all injected BoNT/A molecules are neutralized, immunoresistance occurs. Studies have shown that continuation of treatment of neurology patients who had developed Ab-mediated partial SNR against complexing protein-containing (CPC-) BoNT/A was in some cases successful if patients were switched to complexing protein-free (CPF-) incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO). This seems to contradict the layperson's basic immunological understanding that repeated injection with the same antigen BoNT/A should lead to an increase in antigen-specific antibody titers. As such, we strive to explain how immunological memory works in general, and based on this, we propose a working hypothesis for this paradoxical phenomenon observed in some, but not all, neurology patients with immunoresistance. A critical factor is the presence of potentially immune-stimulatory components in CPC-BoNT/A products that can act as immunologic adjuvants and activate not only naïve, but also memory B lymphocyte responses. Furthermore, we propose that continuous injection of a BoN/TA formulation with low immunogenicity, e.g., INCO, may be a viable option for aesthetic patients with existing nAbs. These concepts are supported by a real-world case example of a patient with immunoresistance whose nAb levels declined with corresponding resumption of clinical response despite regular INCO injections.

Real-world Implications of Botulinum Neurotoxin A Immunoresistance for Consumers and Aesthetic Practitioners: Insights from ASCEND Multidisciplinary Panel

Background

As long-term, regular aesthetic botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) use becomes more commonplace, it is vital to understand real-world risk factors and impact of BoNT-A immunoresistance. The first Aesthetic Council on Ethical Use of Neurotoxin Delivery panel discussed issues relating to BoNT-A immunoresistance from the health care professionals' (HCPs') perspective. Understanding the implications of BoNT-A immunoresistance from the aesthetic patient's viewpoint allows HCPs to better support patients throughout their aesthetic treatment journey.

Methods

A real-world consumer study surveyed 363 experienced aesthetic BoNT-A recipients across six Asia-Pacific territories. The survey mapped participants' BoNT-A aesthetic treatment journey and characterized awareness and attitudes relating to BoNT-A immunoresistance and treatment implications. At the second Aesthetic Council on Ethical use of Neurotoxin Delivery meeting, panelists discussed survey findings and developed consensus statements relating to the impact of BoNT-A immunoresistance on the aesthetic treatment journey.

Results

Aesthetic BoNT-A patients' depth of knowledge about BoNT-A immunoresistance remains low, and risk/benefit communications need to be more lay-friendly. The initial consultation is the most important touchpoint for HCPs to raise awareness of BoNT-A immunoresistance as a potential side effect considering increased risk with repeated high-dose treatments. HCPs should be cognizant of differences across BoNT-A formulations due to the presence of certain excipients and pharmacologically unnecessary components that can increase immunogenicity. Standardized screening for clinical signs of secondary nonresponse and a framework for diagnosing and managing immunoresistance-related secondary nonresponse were proposed.

Conclusion

These insights can help patients and HCPs make informed treatment decisions to achieve desired aesthetic outcomes while preserving future treatment options with BoNT-A.

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy after Botulinum Toxin Injection for Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Spasticity: A Randomized Controlled Study

Post-stroke spasticity is a common complication that limits the functional performance of patients. Botulinum toxin (BTx) is an effective treatment for spasticity. Numerous researchers have applied extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) to address post-stroke spasticity, yielding positive clinical outcomes. We aimed to clarify the add-on effects of ESWT on BTx therapy for spasticity in patients with post-stroke. Sixteen eligible patients with upper extremity spasticity after stroke were recruited for this study. They were randomized to either a BTx with focused ESWT treatment group or a BTx alone group. Spasticity, measured using the modified Ashworth score (MAS) and modified Tardieu scale (MTS), showed statistically significant improvements in the elbow and wrist flexor muscles in both BTx + ESWT group and BTx alone groups. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups with time flow. The BTx + ESWT group showed significantly decreased MAS of the finger flexors at follow-up and increased R1 (MTS) of the finger flexors at 3 weeks after treatment, which was not observed in the BTx alone group. This is the first study to identify the add-on effect of ESWT on BTx injections to improve post-stroke upper limb spasticity.

Assessment of Patients Receiving Short-Interval Botulinum Toxin Chemodenervation Treatment for Laryngeal Dystonia and Essential Tremor of the Vocal Tract

Importance

The gold-standard treatment for laryngeal dystonia (LD) and essential tremor of the vocal tract (ETVT) is botulinum toxin (BoNT) chemodenervation. Although safe and effective, it is not curative, and periodic injections are required. Some medical insurance companies only cover injections at a 3-month interval, though some patients benefit from injections more frequently.

Objective

To determine the proportion and characteristics of patients who receive BoNT chemodenervation treatment in intervals shorter than 90 days.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study across 3 quaternary care neurolaryngology specialty practices in Washington and California recruited patients who underwent at least 4 consecutive laryngeal BoNT injections for LD and/or ETVT in the past 5 years. Data were collected from March through June 2022 and analyzed from June through December 2022.

Exposure

Laryngeal BoNT treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Biodemographic and clinical variables, injection characteristics, evolution during the 3 interinjection intervals, and lifetime laryngeal BoNT treatment data were collected from patient medical records. Logistic regression was used to assess association to the short-interval outcome, defined as an average injection interval shorter than 90 days.

Results

Of 255 patients included from the 3 institutions, 189 (74.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 62.7 (14.3) years. The predominant diagnosis was adductor LD (n = 199 [78.0%]), followed by adductor dystonic voice tremor (n = 26 [10.2%]) and ETVT (n = 13 [5.1%]). Seventy patients (27.5%) received short-interval injections (<90 days). The short-interval group was younger than the long-interval group (≥90 days), with a mean (SD) age of 58.6 (15.5) years and 64.2 (13.5) years, respectively, and a mean difference of -5.7 years (95% CI, -9.6 to -1.8 years). There were no patient-related differences between the short- and long-interval groups in terms of sex, employment status, or diagnosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study demonstrated that while insurance companies often mandate a 3-month or greater interval for BoNT chemodenervation financial coverage, there is a considerable subset of patients with LD and ETVT who receive short-interval treatment to optimize their vocal function. Short-interval chemodenervation injections demonstrate a similar adverse effect profile and do not appear to predispose to resistance through antibody formation.

Causes of Botulinum Toxin Treatment Failure

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to review the cause of botulinum toxin (BT) failure and determine the ways to minimize the risks of its occurrence.

Methods

A PubMed and Google Scholar literature search was conducted with the search terms botulinum toxin, treatment, failure, causes, and prevention. Fifteen relevant articles were found and used as the scientific base for this article.

Results

The failure of BT therapy is associated with immunogenic and non-immunogenic causes and the formation of neutralizing antibodies toward the active components of BT or the complexing proteins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing and mouse hemidiaphragm assay (MHA) can diagnose the failure. The risk of developing treatment failure can be minimized by using complexing protein-free formulations, selecting a treatment regimen with the least immunogenicity, proper injection technique, and gentle product handling.

Conclusion

The treatment failure can compromise the success of BT treatment. Current medical literature shows controversial evidence for and against BT immunogenicity. Therefore, the cause of BT failure is likely to be multifactorial.

Emerging Trends in Botulinum Neurotoxin A Resistance: An International Multidisciplinary Review and Consensus

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection is the most widely performed aesthetic procedure and a first-line therapeutic option for various medical conditions. The potential for BoNT-A immunoresistance and secondary nonresponse related to neutralizing antibody (NAb) formation warrants attention as the range of BoNT-A aesthetic applications continues to expand.

Methods

An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed published evidence on BoNT-A immunoresistance in aesthetic and therapeutic applications and discussed best practices integrating clinical, ethical, and aesthetic considerations. Consensus statements relating to awareness, assessment, and management of the risk of NAb-related secondary nonresponse in aesthetic practice were developed.

Results

There was a consensus that, as doses used in aesthetic practice become like those in therapeutics, rates of NAb formation may be expected to increase. However, the true extent of NAb formation in aesthetics is likely underestimated due to limitations of published evidence and variability in treatment patterns of aesthetic patients. Since BoNT-A therapy is often lifelong, practitioners need to recognize immunogenicity as a potential complication that might affect future therapeutic use and strive to minimize modifiable risk factors. The selection and use of a BoNT-A product with the least immunogenic potential from the beginning may thus be advantageous, especially when treatment with high doses is planned.

Conclusions

In view of current trends in BoNT-A aesthetic use, it is essential for practitioners to conduct thorough clinical assessments, inform patients of treatment risks, and develop BoNT-A treatment plans to minimize immunogenicity. This can help preserve the option of continued or future BoNT-A treatment with satisfactory outcomes.

Immunogenicity Associated with Aesthetic Botulinumtoxin A: A Survey of Asia-Pacific Physicians' Experiences and Recommendations

Background:

Most botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) products contain unnecessary bacterial components that increase the risk of developing neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). Reports of secondary nonresponse and treatment failures (STF) due to nAbs have accompanied a surge in new BoNT/A products.

Methods:

To formulate recommendations on managing toxin resistance, we reviewed the evidence on BoNT/A-associated immunogenicity and evaluated Asian physicians' current BoNT/A practices, knowledge, and real-world experiences, as provided by survey outcomes conducted with 128 Asian experts (regular botulinum toxin injectors).

Results:

Most doctors believe STF occurs, some patients exhibit partial symptoms, and impurities (eg, complexing proteins) in BoNT/A preparations risk STF. Bioassays that distinguish non-nAbs from nAbs that hinder toxin function remain unavailable to most doctors, though most would perform testing if given the option. Doctors in the Asia-Pacific region have differing strategies for managing STF, depending on the availability of alternatives or tests. They recommended switching to a highly-purified formulation free of complexing proteins and other impurities to lower the risk of immunogenicity, or offering treatment holidays of 2 -2.5 years. They suggested restarting treatment with the same highly purified formulation, especially for repeated treatments, large-dose injections, and younger patients who will accumulate higher lifetime doses, so as to minimize immunogenic risks and preserve long-term treatment outcomes. Importantly, doctors should always initiate patients on pure formulations rather than switching to these only after resistance develops.

Conclusion:

Choosing highly purified BoNT/A products at treatment initiation enhances long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction while minimizing the risk of immune activation and nAb formation.

State of the art: Lateral flow assays toward the point-of-care foodborne pathogenic bacteria detection in food samples

Diverse chemicals and some physical phenomena recently introduced in nanotechnology have enabled scientists to develop useful devices in the field of food sciences. Concerning such developments, detecting foodborne pathogenic bacteria is now an important issue. These kinds of bacteria species have demonstrated severe health effects after consuming foods and high mortality related to acute cases. The most leading path of intoxication and infection has been through food matrices. Hence, quick recognition of foodborne bacteria agents at low concentrations has been required in current diagnostics. Lateral flow assays (LFAs) are one of the urgent and prevalently applied quick recognition methods that have been settled for recognizing diverse types of analytes. Thus, the present review has stressed on latest developments in LFAs-based platforms to detect various foodborne pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella, Listeria, Escherichia coli, Brucella, Shigella, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium botulinum, and Vibrio cholera. Proper prominence has been given on exactly how the labels, detection elements, or procedures have affected recent developments in the evaluation of diverse bacteria using LFAs. Additionally, the modifications in assays specificity and sensitivity consistent with applied food processing techniques have been discussed. Finally, a conclusion has been drawn for highlighting the main challenges confronted through this method and offered a view and insight of thoughts for its further development in the future.

Simultaneous Detection of Three Foodborne Pathogens Based on Immunomagnetic Nanoparticles and Fluorescent Quantum Dots

This paper presents a peptide-mediated immunomagnetic separation technique and an immunofluorescence quantum dot technique for simultaneous and rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. First, three peptides that can specifically recognize the three foodborne pathogens were combined with magnetic nanoparticles to form an immunomagnetic nanoparticle probe for capturing three kinds of target bacteria and then added three quantum dot probes (quantum dots-aptamer), which formed a sandwich composite structure. When the three quantum dot probes specifically combined with the three pathogenic bacteria, the remaining fluorescent signal in the supernatant will be reduced by magnetic separation. Therefore, the remaining fluorescent signal in the supernatant can be measured with a fluorescence spectrophotometer to indirectly determine the three pathogens in the sample. The linear range of the method was 10-10⁷ cfu/mL, and in the buffer, the detection limits of E. coli O157:H7, S. aureus, and V. parahaemolyticus were 2.460, 5.407, and 3.770 cfu/mL, respectively. In the tap water simulation, the detection limits of E. coli O157:H7, S. aureus, and V. parahaemolyticus were 2.730, 1.990 × 10¹, and 4.480 cfu/mL, respectively. In the milk simulation sample, the detection limits of E. coli O157:H7, S. aureus, and V. parahaemolyticus were 6.660, 1.070 × 10¹, and 2.236 × 10¹ cfu/mL, respectively. The method we presented can detect three kinds of foodborne pathogens at the same time, and the entire experimental process did not exceed 4 h. It has high sensitivity and low detection limit and may be used in the sample detection of other pathogens.

Antibody-induced botulinum toxin treatment failure: A review and novel management approach

BACKGROUND

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) has been used for cosmetic indications for many decades. Consumption of BoNT/A usage has been markedly increased for a few years. Even new formulations of BoNT/A to decrease immunogenicity have been released, repeated treatment to maintain efficacy outcome is inevitable and could finally provoke immune response. In the past, prevalence of botulinum treatment failure (BTF) in cosmetic indication was rare leading to less medical concern. Current decade, case reports on BTF, especially antibody-induced botulinum toxin treatment failure (ABTF), have been increasingly revealed and risk factors associated with ABTF have been intensively studied.

AIMS

In this article, we will review antibody-induced botulinum toxin treatment failure (ABTF), risk-associated ABTF, prevalence and recent case reports of ABTF, and new approach to deal with ABTF.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted using PubMed. The relevant literatures published between January 2000 and May 2020 concerning BTF and ABTF including investigation for ABTF were included and analyzed.

RESULTS

Possible causes of BTF were summarized. ABTF could be a tip of iceberg of BTF, its prevalence, and currently, 10-year case reports of ABTF were published evidence. Risk factors and investigation methods for ABTF were also summarized. Based on previous studies and our experience, novel approach to management of ABTF was described.

CONCLUSION

Effective management of BTF is to explore causes of treatment failure. Antibodies against BoNT/A complex could be one of many possibilities. Laboratory in vitro tests could be alternative tools to decrease adverse effect and rebooting immune responses in BTF patients.

Association Between Secondary Botulinum Toxin A Treatment Failure in Cosmetic Indication and Anti-Complexing Protein Antibody Production

Introduction

Botulinum toxin A (BoT/A) treatment failure (BTF) affects patients subjected to repeated BoT/A exposure for cosmetic indications. BoT/A’s general formulation contains core BoT/A and complexing proteins. BTF may be caused by antibody-induced treatment failure. Antibodies against core BoT/A can occur; however, anti-complexing protein antibodies have never been demonstrated, and tools for anti-complexing protein antibody detection have not been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate immune involvement in BoT/A-nonresponsive patients.

Methods

Patients suspected of nonresponsiveness to BoT/A for cosmetic indications were recruited. All volunteers were categorized as BoT/A-responsive or BoT/A-tolerant according to frontalis testing with onabotulinumtoxinA (onaA). Twenty-two BoT/A-tolerant volunteers were recruited separately for frontalis testing with incobotulinumtoxinA (incoA). Anti-BoT/A and anti-complexing protein antibodies were quantified by special ELISA using sera from blood sampled before and after frontalis testing.

Results

Significantly higher levels of IgG against complexing protein were detected in onaA-tolerant sera but not in onaA-responders, leading to proposals that anti-complexing protein antibodies could cause onaA unresponsiveness. Some onaA-tolerant patients according to frontalis test with incoA were responsive to incoA. Newly developed absorption ELISA confirmed that incoA-responsive sera predominantly contained IgG against complexing proteins, whereas incoA-tolerant sera contained significant levels of IgG against core BoT/A. The presence of anti-complexing protein antibodies higher than 90.75% in sera of onaA-tolerant patients could respond to incoA. The ELISA technique might be employed as a tool to predict incoA responsiveness. Our frontalis testing after incoA treatment showed that anti-incoA IgG levels were not increased by incoA.

Conclusions

BoT/A-exposed patients may develop antibodies against core botulinum toxin and complexing proteins. Our study is the first to demonstrate that anti-complexing protein antibodies cause BTF. High levels of antibodies against complexing proteins can cause onaA unresponsiveness, although some patients were still incoA-responsive. Our developed ELISA to detect anti-complexing protein antibodies can determine whether onaA-tolerant patients respond to incoA without incoA frontalis testing.