Hepatic safety of efavirenz in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with advanced liver fibrosis

Liver Fibrosis during Antiretroviral Treatment in HIV-Infected Individuals. Truth or Tale?

After the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART) back in 1996, the lifespan of people living with HIV (PLWH) has been substantially increased, while the major causes of morbidity and mortality have switched from opportunistic infections and AIDS-related neoplasms to cardiovascular and liver diseases. HIV itself may lead to liver damage and subsequent liver fibrosis (LF) through multiple pathways. Apart from HIV, viral hepatitis, alcoholic and especially non-alcoholic liver diseases have been implicated in liver involvement among PLWH. Another well known cause of hepatotoxicity is ART, raising clinically significant concerns about LF in long-term treatment. In this review we present the existing data and analyze the association of LF with all ART drug classes. Published data derived from many studies are to some extent controversial and therefore remain inconclusive. Among all the antiretroviral drugs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, especially didanosine and zidovudine, seem to carry the greatest risk for LF, with integrase strand transfer inhibitors and entry inhibitors having minimal risk. Surprisingly, even though protease inhibitors often lead to insulin resistance, they do not seem to be associated with a significant risk of LF. In conclusion, most ART drugs are safe in long-term treatment and seldom lead to severe LF when no liver-related co-morbidities exist.

The potential effects of efavirenz on Oreochromis mossambicus after acute exposure

Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) are hazardous therapeutic pharmaceuticals present in South African surface water. Efavirenz is an ARV commonly used in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment in South Africa. Although little is known about the toxic effects of efavirenz on fish health, threats of toxicity to the aquatic environment have been reported. Oreochromis mossambicus were exposed under controlled conditions to environmentally-relevant efavirenz concentrations (10.3ng/l) as measured in rivers that flow into the Nandoni Dam in the Vhembe District, South Africa. Acute (96h) exposures were conducted using efavirenz concentrations of 10.3ng/l and 20.6ng/l. The overall health of exposed fish was determined using a histology-based fish health assessment index. Necropsies and haematology were conducted and somatic indices calculated after which the liver, kidney, heart, gills and gonads were microscopically quantitatively assessed. Results indicated that fish exposed to 20.6ng/l efavirenz had significantly (p<0.02) higher liver indices than the control fish, indicating increased liver damage including steatosis and frank necrosis. Fish exposed to 20.6ng/l efavirenz presented with significantly (p<0.02) higher total fish indices, representative of declined overall health compared to control fish. It was concluded that the exposure of O. mossambicus to efavirenz resulted in liver damage and overall decline in fish health. These novel findings may indicate a health risk for O. mossambicus and other biota exposed to efavirenz in aquatic ecosystems. Thus, ARV's in water sources of South Africa pose a definite threat to wildlife and ultimately human health.

Natural history and treatment of HCV/HIV coinfection: Is it time to change paradigms?

Evidence over the past decades have shown that HIV/HCV coinfected patients did not respond as well to HCV therapy as HCV mono-infected patients. However, these paradigms are being recently reassessed with the improvements of care for HIV and HCV patients. This article reviews these original paradigms and how the new data is impacting upon them. Treatment efficacy now appears comparable for HIV/HCV coinfected and HCV mono-infected patients, while liver fibrosis progression is increasingly similar in optimally managed patients. Additional importance of therapy is directed to drug-drug interactions and the impact of HCV reinfection, as well as the possibility of transmitted drug resistance.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy-related hepatotoxicity in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus co-infected patients with advanced liver fibrosis in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is higher in Taiwan than in Western countries. This study aimed to analyze the frequency and risk factors for highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-related liver toxicity in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV with advanced liver fibrosis in Taiwan.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 228 HAART-experienced and HAART-naïve patients who were co-infected with HIV and HCV from January 2013 to December 2013 in Taiwan. Transaminase elevation (TE) was defined by grades. Fibrosis 4 score and aspartate-to-platelet ratio index were used to evaluate liver fibrosis. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for time to TE events.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were included. Only two episodes (1.28%) of high-grade TE were observed. The overall prevalence rate of TE was 16%, and the incidence was 1.38 cases/100 patient-months. Two predictive factors of TE were the initiation of HAART during the study period and CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/mm(3). Subgroup analysis showed that HAART improved liver fibrosis status in patients who had advanced liver fibrosis at baseline (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of HAART-related TE in HIV and HCV co-infected patients in Taiwan was much lower than that observed in previous studies. Pre-existing advanced liver fibrosis had no influence on the frequency of TE. The use of HAART showed benefits on liver fibrosis progression in patients with underlying advanced liver fibrosis.

[Consensus Statement by GeSIDA/National AIDS Plan Secretariat on antiretroviral treatment in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (Updated January 2013)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) guidelines for HIV-1 infected adult patients.

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations a panel composed of members of the GeSIDA/National AIDS Plan Secretariat (Grupo de Estudio de Sida and the Secretaría del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida) reviewed the efficacy and safety advances in clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in medical journals (PubMed and Embase) or presented in medical scientific meetings. The strength of the recommendations and the evidence which support them are based on a modification of the criteria of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

RESULTS

cART is recommended in patients with symptoms of HIV infection, in pregnant women, in serodiscordant couples with high risk of transmission, in hepatitisB co-infection requiring treatment, and in HIV nephropathy. cART is recommended in asymptomatic patients if CD4 is <500cells/μl. If CD4 are >500cells/μl cART should be considered in the case of chronic hepatitisC, cirrhosis, high cardiovascular risk, plasma viral load >100.000 copies/ml, proportion of CD4 cells <14%, neurocognitive deficits, and in people aged >55years. The objective of cART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. The first cART should include 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) nucleoside analogs and a third drug (a non-analog RTI, a ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor, or an integrase inhibitor). The panel has consensually selected some drug combinations, for the first cART and specific criteria for cART in acute HIV infection, in tuberculosis and other HIV related opportunistic infections, for the women and in pregnancy, in hepatitisB or C co-infection, in HIV-2 infection, and in post-exposure prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

These new guidelines update previous recommendations related to first cART (when to begin and what drugs should be used), how to monitor, and what to do in case of viral failure or adverse drug reactions. cART specific criteria in comorbid patients and special situations are similarly updated.

The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors in the treatment of HIV infections (AIDS)

The majority of the drugs currently used for the treatment of HIV infections (AIDS) belong to either of the following three classes: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PIs). At present, there are 7 NRTIs, 5 NNRTIs, and 10 PIs approved for clinical use. They are discussed from the following viewpoints: (i) chemical formulae; (ii) mechanism of action; (iii) drug combinations; (iv) clinical aspects; (v) preexposure prophylaxis; (vi) prevention of mother-to-child transmission; (vii) their use in children; (viii) toxicity; (ix) adherence (compliance); (x) resistance; (xi) new NRTIs, NNRTIs, or PIs in (pre)clinical development; and (xii) the prospects for a "cure" of the disease.