Interferon-gamma release assay for tuberculosis screening of solid-organ transplant recipients is cost-effective

Analysis of Indeterminate QuantiFERON Assay Results in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Proposed Management Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) mitigate the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. TB reactivation is higher in those with indeterminate QuantiFERON (QFT) than those with negative results. Management of indeterminate QFT results in the pretransplant period remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, 18 y and older, who were screened with QFT assay pretransplantation at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and June 2023. We examined the frequency of indeterminate QFT results, results of repeat LTBI screening, treatment decisions, and rate of posttransplant TB infection.

RESULTS

Of 13 008 patients screened for LTBI before SOT, 736 (6%) patients had indeterminate QFT results. Among these, 247 (34%) underwent a second LTBI screening test, and 39 (5%) received LTBI treatment. Among 247 patients with a repeat LTBI screening test, 185 (75%), 48 (19%), and 14 (6%) were tested by QFT, T-SPOT.TB, or TST, respectively. The repeat QFT remained indeterminate in 160 (86%) patients, whereas all T-SPOT.TB results were negative. Posttransplant TB infection occurred in 2 (0.3%) patients; neither had a second TB screening test pretransplant nor received LTBI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients with indeterminate QFT results at pretransplant evaluation, opting for T-SPOT.TB as a second test may be preferable over repeat QFT. TB infection after transplantation in patients with a pretransplant indeterminate QFT result was rare. Patient management and LTBI treatment in those with indeterminate QFT pretransplant should account for epidemiological risk factors, and shared decision-making is recommended.

Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing QuantiFERON test and tuberculin skin test for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in immunocompetent children under 15 years of age in Colombia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of the QuantiFERON (QFT) test versus the tuberculin skin test (TST) in diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in immunocompetent children under 15 years of age who are in contact with active tuberculosis (TB) patients in the context of the Colombian healthcare system.

DESIGN

Health economic evaluation. Decision tree over a horizon of <1 year.

SETTING

From the perspective of the Colombian healthcare system, the direct healthcare costs related to tests were considered, and diagnostic performance was used as a measure of effectiveness. The currency was the US dollar (US$) for the year 2022, with a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$6666.

PARTICIPANTS

A simulated hypothetical cohort of 2000 immunocompetent children under 15 years of age who are in contact with active TB patients and were vaccinated with BCG at birth.

INTERVENTIONS

QFT test and TST to detect LTBI.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated, and univariate deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted using 5000 simulations.

RESULTS

QFT was found to be cost-effective with an ICER of US$705 for each correctly diagnosed case. In the one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis, QFT remained cost-effective across nearly all proposed scenarios; however, the QFT was considered 'potentially cost-effective' when TST specificity reached its highest value. The ICER was unaffected by variations in LTBI prevalence. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, QFT was cost-effective in 85.06% of the simulated scenarios, while TST was dominant in 11.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of the cost-effectiveness of QFT compared with TST in diagnosing LTBI among immunocompetent children under 15 years who have been in contact with active TB patients in the Colombian context.

A systematic review of cost-utility analyses of screening methods in latent tuberculosis infection in high-risk populations

Background

The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) should be undertaken in high-risk groups using either interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) or a tuberculin skin test (TST). As IGRAs are more expensive than TST, an assessment of the cost-effectiveness of IGRAs can guide decision makers on the most appropriate choice of test for different high-risk populations. This current review aimed to provide the most up to date evidence on the cost-effectiveness evidence on LTBI testing in high-risk groups—specifically evidence reporting the costs per QALY of different testing strategies.

Methods

A comprehensive search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and NHS-EED was undertaken from 2011 up to March 2021. Studies were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. The study quality was assessed using the Bias in Economic Evaluation Checklist (ECOBIAS). A narrative synthesis of the included studies was undertaken.

Results

Thirty-two studies reported in thirty-three documents were included in this review. Quality of included studies was generally high, although there was a weakness across all studies referencing sources correctly and/or justifying choices of parameter values chosen or assumptions where parameter values were not available. Inclusions of IGRAs in testing strategies was consistently found across studies to be cost-effective but this result was sensitive to underlying LTBI prevalence rates.

Conclusion

While some concerns remain about uncertainty in parameter values used across included studies, the evidence base since 2010 has grown with modelling approaches addressing the weakness pointed out in previous reviews but still reaching the same conclusion that IGRAs are likely to be cost-effective in high-income countries for high-risk populations. Evidence is also required on the cost-effectiveness of different strategies in low to middle income countries and countries with high TB burden.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02149-x.

Diagnostic Value of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Tuberculosis in the Immunocompromised Population

Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are widely used in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection by detecting interferon-γ released by previously sensitized T-cells in-vitro. Currently, there are two assays based on either enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) technology, with several generations of products available. The diagnostic value of IGRAs in the immunocompromised population is significantly different from that in the immunocompetent population because their results are strongly affected by the host immune function. Both physiological and pathological factors can lead to an immunocompromised situation. We summarized the diagnostic value and clinical recommendations of IGRAs for different immunocompromised populations, including peoplewith physiological factors (pregnant and puerperal women, children, and older people), as well as people with pathological factors (solid organ transplantation recipients, combination with human immunodeficiency virus infection, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, and chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases). Though the performance of IGRAs is not perfect and often requires a combination with other diagnostic strategies, it still has some value in the immunocompromised population. Hopefully, the newly developed IGRAs could better target this population.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis in solid organ transplant donors and recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to impaired immune response, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are susceptible to tuberculosis (TB) and its subsequent morbidity and mortality. Current prevention strategies, diagnostic and treatment approach to TB infection in donors and recipients were reviewed in this article.

RECENT FINDINGS

Screening of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in donors and recipients is the cornerstone of TB-preventive strategy in recipients and requires an assessment of TB risk factors, TB-specific immunity testing, and radiographic evaluation. Interferon-gamma release assay has superseded the tuberculin skin test in LTBI evaluation despite its recognized limitations. LTBI treatment should be offered to transplant candidates and living donors before transplantation and donation, respectively. Diagnosis of TB disease can be challenging because of nonspecific clinical presentation in the recipient and is limited by the sensitivity of current diagnostics. The approach to LTBI and TB disease treatment is similar to the general population, but can be challenging because of potential drug interactions and toxicities.

SUMMARY

The appropriate evaluation of donors and recipients for TB can mitigate posttransplant TB disease. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment parallels that of immunocompetent hosts. Future research evaluating existing and novel diagnostics and treatment in transplant recipients is needed.

The usefulness of quantitative interferon-gamma releasing assay response for predicting active tuberculosis in kidney transplant recipients: A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effectiveness of IGRA-based isoniazid (INH) treatment with the diagnostic value of quantitative IGRA titer for post-transplant tuberculosis (TB) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

METHODS

All adult KT recipients were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2017. The development of TB after KT was observed, stratified by quantitative IGRA results as well as by IGRA results with/without INH treatment.

RESULTS

Of 1150 KT recipients, 322 (28%) revealed positive IGRA results (≥0.35 IU/mL) and 12 (1.0%) developed TB. Seven (3.2%) of 217 patients with positive IGRA without INH developed TB, whereas none of 105 patients with positive IGRA with INH developed TB (rate difference -1616 per 100,000 person-years, P = 0.016) and 5 (0.6%) of 828 patients with negative or indeterminate IGRA developed TB (rate difference -1388 per 100,000 person-years, P<0.001). Among the 217 positive IGRA patients without INH, 6 (6.4%) of 94 patients who had positive IGRA titer>2.96 IU/mL developed TB, whereas one (0.8%) of 123 patients who had positive IGRA titer≤2.96 IU/mL developed TB (rate difference 2964 per 100,000 person-years, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

IGRA-based INH treatment with risk stratification by quantitative IGRA results appears to be effective to prevent the development of TB in KT recipients.

Tuberculosis among Patients Undergoing Solid Organ Transplantation or Dialysis in a Low-Endemic Country, 2004-2017

Background

The risk of active TB among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and patients initiating chronic dialysis in a country with low incidence of TB is not well elucidated.

Methods

Patients aged >18 years who were transplanted with a solid organ or initiated chronic dialysis at Copenhagen University Hospital in the period 2004-2017 were followed from date of transplantation or initiation of dialysis. Data on demographics and outcomes were obtained from nationwide registries.

Results

We included 1,989 SOT recipients and 1,305 patients initiating chronic dialysis, who were followed for a total of 9,785 and 4,196 person-years (PY), respectively. Only a minority of patients had been screened for latent TB prior to SOT or initiation of dialysis. The incidence rates (IRs)/100,000 PY of TB among patients from medium/high TB endemic areas were 358 (95% CI 115-1,110) and 1,266 (95% CI 681-2354) for SOT and dialysis patients, respectively, whereas IRs among patients of Danish origin were 11 (95% CI 2-81) and 31 (95% CI 4-218).

Conclusion

The incidence of TB among immunosuppressed immigrants from medium/high TB endemic countries was very high, while the risk of TB among patients from low-endemic countries was minimal.