The length of the 5' leader of Escherichia coli tRNA precursors influences bacterial growth

The discovery of a catalytic RNA within RNase P and its legacy

Sidney Altman's discovery of the processing of one RNA by another RNA that acts like an enzyme was revolutionary in biology and the basis for his sharing the 1989 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Thomas Cech. These breakthrough findings support the key role of RNA in molecular evolution, where replicating RNAs (and similar chemical derivatives) either with or without peptides functioned in protocells during the early stages of life on Earth, an era referred to as the RNA world. Here, we cover the historical background highlighting the work of Altman and his colleagues and the subsequent efforts of other researchers to understand the biological function of RNase P and its catalytic RNA subunit and to employ it as a tool to downregulate gene expression. We primarily discuss bacterial RNase P-related studies but acknowledge that many groups have significantly contributed to our understanding of archaeal and eukaryotic RNase P, as reviewed in this special issue and elsewhere.

The specificity landscape of bacterial ribonuclease P

Developing quantitative models of substrate specificity for RNA processing enzymes is a key step toward understanding their biology and guiding applications in biotechnology and biomedicine. Optimally, models to predict relative rate constants for alternative substrates should integrate an understanding of structures of the enzyme bound to "fast" and "slow" substrates, large datasets of rate constants for alternative substrates, and transcriptomic data identifying in vivo processing sites. Such data are either available or emerging for bacterial ribonucleoprotein RNase P a widespread and essential tRNA 5' processing endonuclease, thus making it a valuable model system for investigating principles of biological specificity. Indeed, the well-established structure and kinetics of bacterial RNase P enabled the development of high throughput measurements of rate constants for tRNA variants and provided the necessary framework for quantitative specificity modeling. Several studies document the importance of conformational changes in the precursor tRNA substrate as well as the RNA and protein subunits of bacterial RNase P during binding, although the functional roles and dynamics are still being resolved. Recently, results from cryo-EM studies of E. coli RNase P with alternative precursor tRNAs are revealing prospective mechanistic relationships between conformational changes and substrate specificity. Yet, extensive uncharted territory remains, including leveraging these advances for drug discovery, achieving a complete accounting of RNase P substrates, and understanding how the cellular context contributes to RNA processing specificity in vivo.

Maturation of the E. coli Glu2, Ile1 and Ala1B tRNAs utilizes a complex processing pathway

Despite significant progress in understanding the diversity of tRNA processing pathways in Escherichia coli, the mechanism for the maturation of tRNAs encoded within the rRNA operons has not received much attention. Here we show that the Glu2, Ile1 and Ala1B tRNAs, encoded by 10 genes located between the 16S and 23S rRNAs in the seven rRNA operons, are matured via a RNase E-independent processing pathway that utilizes at least six different enzymes. It has been shown that the Glu2 and Ile1-Ala1B pre-tRNAs released by initial RNase III cleavages of the 30S primary rRNA transcripts retain extended 5'-leader (35-139 nt) and 3'-trailer (166-185 nt) sequences. However, the 5' maturation of the tRNAs by RNase P is inhibited until the trailer sequences are shortened to 1-4 nucleotides, initially by a second RNase III cleavage at 31-42 nucleotides downstream of the CCA determinant followed by exonucleolytic trimming. The RNase III cleaved Glu2 and Ile1-Ala1B trailer fragments are degraded via PAP I- dependent exonucleolytic decay. Compared to the six previously characterized tRNA processing pathways, maturation of the Glu2, Ile1, and Ala1B tRNAs is considerably more complex and appears to be distinct from what occurs in Gram-positive bacteria.

Generation of pre-tRNAs from polycistronic operons is the essential function of RNase P in Escherichia coli

Ribonuclease P (RNase P) is essential for the 5′-end maturation of tRNAs in all kingdoms of life. In Escherichia coli, temperature sensitive mutations in either its protein (rnpA49) and or RNA (rnpB709) subunits lead to inviability at nonpermissive temperatures. Using the rnpA49 temperature sensitive allele, which encodes a partially defective RNase P at the permissive temperature, we show here for the first time that the processing of RNase P-dependent polycistronic tRNA operons to release pre-tRNAs is the essential function of the enzyme, since the majority of 5′-immature tRNAs can be aminoacylated unless their 5′-extensions ≥8 nt. Surprisingly, the failure of 5′-end maturation elicits increased polyadenylation of some pre-tRNAs by poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I), which exacerbates inviability. The absence of PAP I led to improved aminoacylation of 5′-immature tRNAs. Our data suggest a more dynamic role for PAP I in maintaining functional tRNA levels in the cell.

Distributive enzyme binding controlled by local RNA context results in 3' to 5' directional processing of dicistronic tRNA precursors by Escherichia coli ribonuclease P

RNA processing by ribonucleases and RNA modifying enzymes often involves sequential reactions of the same enzyme on a single precursor transcript. In Escherichia coli, processing of polycistronic tRNA precursors involves separation into individual pre-tRNAs by one of several ribonucleases followed by 5′ end maturation by ribonuclease P. A notable exception are valine and lysine tRNAs encoded by three polycistronic precursors that follow a recently discovered pathway involving initial 3′ to 5′ directional processing by RNase P. Here, we show that the dicistronic precursor containing tRNA^valV and tRNA^valW undergoes accurate and efficient 3′ to 5′ directional processing by RNase P in vitro. Kinetic analyses reveal a distributive mechanism involving dissociation of the enzyme between the two cleavage steps. Directional processing is maintained despite swapping or duplicating the two tRNAs consistent with inhibition of processing by 3′ trailer sequences. Structure-function studies identify a stem–loop in 5′ leader of tRNA^valV that inhibits RNase P cleavage and further enforces directional processing. The results demonstrate that directional processing is an intrinsic property of RNase P and show how RNA sequence and structure context can modulate reaction rates in order to direct precursors along specific pathways.

The rph-1-Encoded Truncated RNase PH Protein Inhibits RNase P Maturation of Pre-tRNAs with Short Leader Sequences in the Absence of RppH

RNase PH, encoded by the rph gene, is a 3'→5' exoribonuclease that in E. coli participates primarily in the 3' maturation of pre-tRNAs and the degradation of rRNA in stationary-phase cells. Interestingly, the routinely used laboratory strains of MG1655 and W3110 have naturally acquired the rph-1 allele, encoding a truncated catalytically inactive RNase PH protein which is widely assumed to be benign. Contrary to this assumption, we show that the rph-1-encoded Rph-1 protein inhibits RNase P-mediated 5'-end maturation of primary pre-tRNAs with leaders of <5 nucleotides in the absence of RppH, an RNA pyrophosphohydrolase. In contrast, RppH is not required for 5'-end maturation of endonucleolytically generated pre-tRNAs in the rph-1 strain and for any tRNAs in Δrph mutant or rph⁺ strains. We propose that the Rph-1 protein bound to the 3' end of the substrate creates a steric hindrance that in the presence of a triphosphate at the 5' end reduces the ability of RNase P to bind to the pre-tRNA.IMPORTANCE In this paper, we demonstrate that the rph-1 mutation found in commonly used E. coli strains leads to the synthesis of a truncated functionally inactive RNase PH protein that interferes with the 5'-end maturation of specific tRNAs with short 5' leaders by RNase P in the absence of RppH, an RNA pyrophosphohydrolase that converts primary 5' triphosphates into 5' monophosphates. The data presented indicate that the presence of the triphosphate interferes with RNase P binding to the pre-tRNA.

The central role of tRNA in genetic code expansion

BACKGROUND

The development of orthogonal translation systems (OTSs) for genetic code expansion (GCE) has allowed for the incorporation of a diverse array of non-canonical amino acids (ncAA) into proteins. Transfer RNA, the central molecule in the translation of the genetic message into proteins, plays a significant role in the efficiency of ncAA incorporation.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Here we review the biochemical basis of OTSs for genetic code expansion. We focus on the role of tRNA and discuss strategies used to engineer tRNA for the improvement of ncAA incorporation into proteins.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

The engineering of orthogonal tRNAs for GCE has significantly improved the incorporation of ncAAs. However, there are numerous unintended consequences of orthogonal tRNA engineering that cannot be predicted ab initio.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Genetic code expansion has allowed for the incorporation of a great diversity of ncAAs and novel chemistries into proteins, making significant contributions to our understanding of biological molecules and interactions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Biochemistry of Synthetic Biology - Recent Developments" Guest Editor: Dr. Ilka Heinemann and Dr. Patrick O'Donoghue.

Analysis of the RNA Binding Specificity Landscape of C5 Protein Reveals Structure and Sequence Preferences that Direct RNase P Specificity

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) are typically involved in non-equilibrium cellular processes, and specificity can arise from differences in ground state, transition state, or product states of the binding reactions for alternative RNAs. Here, we use high-throughput methods to measure and analyze the RNA association kinetics and equilibrium binding affinity for all possible sequence combinations in the precursor tRNA binding site of C5, the essential protein subunit of Escherichia coli RNase P. The results show that the RNA sequence specificity of C5 arises due to favorable RNA-protein interactions that stabilize the transition state for association and bound enzyme-substrate complex. Specificity is further impacted by unfavorable RNA structure involving the C5 binding site in the ground state. The results illustrate a comprehensive quantitative approach for analysis of RNA binding specificity, and show how both RNA structure and sequence preferences of an essential protein subunit direct the specificity of a ribonucleoprotein enzyme.

Transition-state stabilization in Escherichia coli ribonuclease P RNA-mediated cleavage of model substrates

We have used model substrates carrying modified nucleotides at the site immediately 5' of the canonical RNase P cleavage site, the -1 position, to study Escherichia coli RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage. We show that the nucleobase at -1 is not essential but its presence and identity contribute to efficiency, fidelity of cleavage and stabilization of the transition state. When U or C is present at -1, the carbonyl oxygen at C2 on the nucleobase contributes to transition-state stabilization, and thus acts as a positive determinant. For substrates with purines at -1, an exocyclic amine at C2 on the nucleobase promotes cleavage at an alternative site and it has a negative impact on cleavage at the canonical site. We also provide new insights into the interaction between E. coli RNase P RNA and the -1 residue in the substrate. Our findings will be discussed using a model where bacterial RNase P cleavage proceeds through a conformational-assisted mechanism that positions the metal(II)-activated H2O for an in-line attack on the phosphorous atom that leads to breakage of the phosphodiester bond.

Structural studies of RNase P

Ribonuclease P (RNase P) is one of the first ribozymes discovered and it is found in all phylogenetic groups. It is responsible for processing the 5' end of pre-tRNAs as well as other RNA molecules. RNase P is formed by an RNA molecule responsible for catalysis and one or more proteins. Structural studies of the proteins from different organisms, the bacterial RNA component, and a bacterial RNase P holoenzyme/tRNA complex provide insights into the mechanism of this universal ribozyme. Together with the existing wealth of biochemical information, these studies provide atomic-level information on the mechanism of RNase P and continue to expand our understanding of the structure and architecture of large RNA molecules and ribonucleoprotein complexes, the nature of catalysis by ribozymes, the structural basis of recognition of RNA by RNA molecules, and the evolution of enzymes from the prebiotic, RNA-based world to the modern world.

Alternative substrate kinetics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease P: determination of relative rate constants by internal competition

A single enzyme, ribonuclease P (RNase P), processes the 5' ends of tRNA precursors (ptRNA) in cells and organelles that carry out tRNA biosynthesis. This substrate population includes over 80 different competing ptRNAs in Escherichia coli. Although the reaction kinetics and molecular recognition of a few individual model substrates of bacterial RNase P have been well described, the competitive substrate kinetics of the enzyme are comparatively unexplored. To understand the factors that determine how different ptRNA substrates compete for processing by E. coli RNase P, we compared the steady state reaction kinetics of two ptRNAs that differ at sequences that are contacted by the enzyme. For both ptRNAs, substrate cleavage is fast relative to dissociation. As a consequence, V/K, the rate constant for the reaction at limiting substrate concentrations, reflects the substrate association step for both ptRNAs. Reactions containing two or more ptRNAs follow simple competitive alternative substrate kinetics in which the relative rates of processing are determined by ptRNA concentration and their V/K. The relative V/K values for eight different ptRNAs, which were selected to represent the range of structure variation at sites contacted by RNase P, were determined by internal competition in reactions in which all eight substrates were present simultaneously. The results reveal a relatively narrow range of V/K values, suggesting that rates of ptRNA processing by RNase P are tuned for uniform specificity and consequently optimal coupling to precursor biosynthesis.

The bacterial ribonuclease P holoenzyme requires specific, conserved residues for efficient catalysis and substrate positioning

RNase P is an RNA-based enzyme primarily responsible for 5′-end pre-tRNA processing. A structure of the bacterial RNase P holoenzyme in complex with tRNA^Phe revealed the structural basis for substrate recognition, identified the active site location, and showed how the protein component increases functionality. The active site includes at least two metal ions, a universal uridine (U52), and P RNA backbone moieties, but it is unclear whether an adjacent, bacterially conserved protein loop (residues 52–57) participates in catalysis. Here, mutagenesis combined with single-turnover reaction kinetics demonstrate that point mutations in this loop have either no or modest effects on catalytic efficiency. Similarly, amino acid changes in the ‘RNR’ region, which represent the most conserved region of bacterial RNase P proteins, exhibit negligible changes in catalytic efficiency. However, U52 and two bacterially conserved protein residues (F17 and R89) are essential for efficient Thermotoga maritima RNase P activity. The U52 nucleotide binds a metal ion at the active site, whereas F17 and R89 are positioned >20 Å from the cleavage site, probably making contacts with N₋₄ and N₋₅ nucleotides of the pre-tRNA 5′-leader. This suggests a synergistic coupling between transition state formation and substrate positioning via interactions with the leader.

Trials, travails and triumphs: an account of RNA catalysis in RNase P

Last December marked the 20th anniversary of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Sidney Altman and Thomas Cech for their discovery of RNA catalysts in bacterial ribonuclease P (an enzyme catalyzing 5' maturation of tRNAs) and a self-splicing rRNA of Tetrahymena, respectively. Coinciding with the publication of a treatise on RNase P, this review provides a historical narrative, a brief report on our current knowledge, and a discussion of some research prospects on RNase P.

The presence of a C-1/G+73 pair in a tRNA precursor influences processing and expression in vivo

To understand whether 5' and 3' structural elements of the region corresponding to the mature tRNA affect the expression of the tRNA, we examined several bacterial genomes for tRNA genes where the expression might be potentially affected by structural elements located outside of the mature tRNA. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, our analysis suggested that the tRNA(Trp) is transcribed together with a putative stem-loop structure followed by a uridine tract immediately downstream of the tRNA region. This structural element, resembling a Rho-independent transcription terminator, might therefore influence the expression and processing of tRNA(Trp). Moreover, the secondary structure suggested that the discriminator base in the tRNA(Trp) precursor can pair with either the C at position -1, the 3' terminal residue in the 5' leader, or the C immediately 5' of the uridine tract of the putative Rho-independent transcription terminator. Here, we present in vivo data demonstrating the importance of residue -1 and the positioning of the putative transcription terminator for the expression of correctly 5' processed P. aeruginosa tRNA(Trp) in Escherichia coli. Interestingly, we also detected a difference in the appearance of correctly 5' processed P. aeruginosa tRNA(Trp) in E. coli compared to the situation in P. aeruginosa.

Evidence that substrate-specific effects of C5 protein lead to uniformity in binding and catalysis by RNase P

The ribonucleoprotein enzyme RNase P processes all pre-tRNAs, yet some substrates apparently lack consensus elements for recognition. Here, we compare binding affinities and cleavage rates of Escherichia coli pre-tRNAs that exhibit the largest variation from consensus recognition sequences. These results reveal that the affinities of both consensus and nonconsensus substrates for the RNase P holoenzyme are essentially uniform. Comparative analyses of pre-tRNA and tRNA binding to the RNase P holoenzyme and P RNA alone reveal differential contributions of the protein subunit to 5' leader and tRNA affinity. Additionally, these studies reveal that uniform binding results from variations in the energetic contribution of the 5' leader, which serve to compensate for weaker tRNA interactions. Furthermore, kinetic analyses reveal uniformity in the rates of substrate cleavage that result from dramatic (> 900-fold) contributions of the protein subunit to catalysis for some nonconsensus pre-tRNAs. Together, these data suggest that an important biological function of RNase P protein is to offset differences in pre-tRNA structure such that binding and catalysis are uniform.

The genomic pattern of tDNA operon expression in E. coli

In fast-growing microorganisms, a tRNA concentration profile enriched in major isoacceptors selects for the biased usage of cognate codons. This optimizes translational rate for the least mass invested in the translational apparatus. Such translational streamlining is thought to be growth-regulated, but its genetic basis is poorly understood. First, we found in reanalysis of the E. coli tRNA profile that the degree to which it is translationally streamlined is nearly invariant with growth rate. Then, using least squares multiple regression, we partitioned tRNA isoacceptor pools to predicted tDNA operons from the E. coli K12 genome. Co-expression of tDNAs in operons explains the tRNA profile significantly better than tDNA gene dosage alone. Also, operon expression increases significantly with proximity to the origin of replication, oriC, at all growth rates. Genome location explains about 15% of expression variation in a form, at a given growth rate, that is consistent with replication-dependent gene concentration effects. Yet the change in the tRNA profile with growth rate is less than would be expected from such effects. We estimated per-copy expression rates for all tDNA operons that were consistent with independent estimates for rDNA operons. We also found that tDNA operon location, and the location dependence of expression, were significantly different in the leading and lagging strands. The operonic organization and genomic location of tDNA operons are significant factors influencing their expression. Nonrandom patterns of location and strandedness shown by tDNA operons in E. coli suggest that their genomic architecture may be under selection to satisfy physiological demand for tRNA expression at high growth rates.

The concentrations of tRNAs are co-adapted to codon usage frequencies in the transcriptomes of E. coli and other diverse organisms. But how are tRNA concentrations determined? Here, the researchers analyzed the E. coli tRNA concentration profile in its genomic context, using clustering and regression methods to partition tRNA concentration data to tDNA operons that were defined semi-automatically. They found that co-expression in operons explains the tRNA profile much better than tDNA gene dosage alone. Furthermore, they could significantly explain the total expression from tDNA operons by their distance from the genomic origin of replication. Per-copy transcription initiation rates from tDNA operons were also estimated. Although there is some evidence for replication-dependent effects on tDNA operon expression, this cannot explain how constant the tRNA profile is with growth rate. As a consequence, tDNA promoters are predicted to compensate for the location of their operons. Finally, the researchers found pronounced asymmetries between the leading and lagging genomic strands in the locations of tDNA operons, and on the effect of location on their expression. These nonrandom patterns suggest that the genomic location and strandedness of tDNA operons may be under some selection in E. coli to satisfy physiological demand for tRNAs at high growth rates.