Molecular Analysis of pSK1 par: A Novel Plasmid Partitioning System Encoded by Staphylococcal Multiresistance Plasmids

Molecular dissection of the chromosome partitioning protein RocS and regulation by phosphorylation

Chromosome segregation in bacteria is a critical process ensuring that each daughter cell receives an accurate copy of the genetic material during cell division. Active segregation factors, such as the ParABS system or SMC complexes, are usually essential for this process, but they are surprisingly dispensable in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Rather, chromosome segregation in S. pneumoniae relies on the protein Regulator of Chromosome Segregation (RocS), although the molecular mechanisms involved remain elusive. By combining genetics, in vivo imaging, and biochemical approaches, we dissected the molecular features of RocS involved in chromosome segregation. We investigated the respective functions of the three RocS domains, specifically the C-terminal amphipathic helix (AH), the N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD), and the coiled-coil domain (CCD) separating the AH and the DBD. Notably, we found that a single AH is not sufficient for membrane binding and that RocS requires prior oligomerization to interact with the membrane. We further demonstrated that this self-interaction was driven by the N-terminal part of the CCD. On the other hand, we revealed that the C-terminal part of the CCD corresponds to a domain of unknown function (DUF 536) and is defined by three conserved glutamines, which play a crucial role in RocS-mediated chromosome segregation. Finally, we showed that the DBD is phosphorylated by the unique serine-threonine kinase of S. pneumoniae StkP and that mimicking this phosphorylation abrogated RocS binding to DNA. Overall, this study offers new insights into chromosome segregation in Streptococci and paves the way for a deeper understanding of RocS-like proteins in other bacteria.IMPORTANCEBacteria have evolved a variety of mechanisms to properly segregate their genetic material during cell division. In this study, we performed a molecular dissection of the chromosome partitioning protein Regulator of Chromosome Segregation (RocS), a pillar element of chromosome segregation in S. pneumoniae that is also generally conserved in the Streptococcaceae family. Our systematic investigation sheds light on the molecular features required for successful pneumococcal chromosome segregation and the regulation of RocS by phosphorylation. In addition, our study also revealed that RocS shares functional domains with the Par protein, involved in an atypical plasmid segregation system. Therefore, we expect that our findings may serve to extend our understanding of RocS and RocS-like proteins while broadening the repertoire of partitioning systems used in bacteria.

DNA Segregation in Enterobacteria

DNA segregation ensures that cell offspring receive at least one copy of each DNA molecule, or replicon, after their replication. This important cellular process includes different phases leading to the physical separation of the replicons and their movement toward the future daughter cells. Here, we review these phases and processes in enterobacteria with emphasis on the molecular mechanisms at play and their controls.

pSK41/pGO1-family conjugative plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus encode a cryptic repressor of replication

The majority of large multiresistance plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus utilise a RepA_N-type replication initiation protein, the expression of which is regulated by a small antisense RNA (RNAI) that overlaps the rep mRNA leader. The pSK41/pGO1-family of conjugative plasmids additionally possess a small (86 codon) divergently transcribed ORF (orf86) located upstream of the rep locus. The product of pSK41 orf86 was predicted to have a helix-turn-helix motif suggestive of a likely function in transcriptional repression. In this study, we investigated the effect of Orf86 on transcription of thirteen pSK41 backbone promoters. We found that Orf86 only repressed transcription from the rep promoter, and hence now redesignate the product as Cop. Over-expression of Cop in trans reduced the copy number of pSK41 mini-replicons, both in the presence and absence of rnaI. in vitro protein-DNA binding experiments with purified 6 × His-Cop demonstrated specific DNA binding, adjacent to, and partially overlapping the -35 hexamer of the rep promoter. The crystal structure of Cop revealed a dimeric structure similar to other known transcriptional regulators. Cop mRNA was found to result from "read-through" transcription from the strong RNAI promoter that escapes the rnaI terminator. Thus, PrnaI is responsible for transcription of two distinct negative regulators of plasmid copy number; the antisense RNAI that primarily represses Rep translation, and Cop protein that can repress rep transcription. Deletion of cop in a native plasmid did not appear to impact copy number, indicating a cryptic auxiliary role.

Atypical low-copy number plasmid segregation systems, all in one?

Plasmid families harbor different maintenances functions, depending on their size and copy number. Low copy number plasmids rely on active partition systems, organizing a partition complex at specific centromere sites that is actively positioned using NTPase proteins. Some low copy number plasmids lack an active partition system, but carry atypical intracellular positioning systems using a single protein that binds to the centromere site but without an associated NTPase. These systems have been studied in the case of the Escherichia coli R388 and of the Staphylococcus aureus pSK1 plasmids. Here we review these two systems, which appear to be unrelated but share common features, such as their distribution on plasmids of medium size and copy number, certain activities of their centromere-binding proteins, StbA and Par, respectively, as well as their mode of action, which may involve dynamic interactions with the nucleoid-packed chromosome of their hosts.

Interaction of an anticancer benzopyrane derivative with DNA: Biophysical, biochemical, and molecular modeling studies

BACKGROUND

SIMR1281 is a potent anticancer lead candidate with multi- target activity against several proteins; however, its mechanism of action at the molecular level is not fully understood. Revealing the mechanism and the origin of multitarget activity is important for the rational identification and optimization of multitarget drugs.

METHODS

We have used a variety of biophysical (circular dichroism, isothermal titration calorimetry, viscosity, and UV DNA melting), biochemical (topoisomerase I & II assays) and computational (molecular docking and MD simulations) methods to study the interaction of SIMR1281 with duplex DNA structures.

RESULTS

The biophysical results revealed that SIMR1281 binds to dsDNA via an intercalation-binding mode with an average binding constant of 3.1 × 10⁶ M^-1. This binding mode was confirmed by the topoisomerases' inhibition assays and molecular modeling simulations, which showed the intercalation of the benzopyrane moiety between DNA base pairs, while the remaining moieties (thiazole and phenyl rings) sit in the minor groove and interact with the flanking base pairs adjacent to the intercalation site.

CONCLUSIONS

The DNA binding characteristics of SIMR1281, which can disrupt/inhibit DNA function as confirmed by the topoisomerases' inhibition assays, indicate that the observed multi-target activity might originate from ligand intervention at nucleic acids level rather than due to direct interactions with multiple biological targets at the protein level.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of this study could be helpful to guide future optimization of benzopyrane-based ligands for therapeutic purposes.