Is Hysteroscopy a Good Option to Manage Severe Cesarean Scar Defect?

Impact of cesarean scar defect on reproductive outcomes after assisted reproductive technology

In last twenty years, the cesarean section rate has been rising in China, leading to an increased prevalence of cesarean scar defect (CSD) and secondary infertility. CSD decreases receptivity of endometrium, induces adenomyosis and endometriosis, disrupts uterine micro-environment, causes difficulty of embryo transplant operation and further pregnancy complications. For women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), CSD significantly reduces embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. CSD can be effectively treated by hysteroscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and transvaginal surgery to increase the pregnancy rate. This article reviews the research progress on the impact of CSD on the reproductive outcomes of ART, the potential factors and related treatment, to provide reference for CSD management in ART patients.

Comparison of clinical effectiveness and subsequent fertility between hysteroscopic resection and vaginal repair in patients with cesarean scar defect: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and pregnancy rate after hysteroscopic resection (HR) and/or vaginal repair (VR) in patients with cesarean scar defect (CSD).

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 191 patients who received CSD surgery in the First affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between September 2019 to February 2022 (96 in HR and 95 in VR, respectively). Patient follow-up were performed three months after surgery in both groups by transvaginal ultrasound to confirm the presence of fluid in the niche, along with the resolution of prolonged menses at the same time. The primary outcome was the clinical effectiveness between HR and VR, identified by the resolution of prolonged menses.

RESULTS

The rates of niche-fluid disappearance (70.1% vs 60.2%, P = 0.176) and prolonged menses resolution (74.8% vs 80.0%, P = 0.341) were comparable for HR and VR. A subgroup analysis for niche size revealed that HR provides patients with small niche a more favorable rate of menstrual resolution compared to VR (size of niche ≤ 15 mm2, aOR = 3.423, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.073-10.918), but patients with large niche experience a lower rate of resolution compared to VR (size of niche > 25 mm2, aOR = 0.286, 95% CI 0.087- 0.938). During follow-up, 41 patients who wanted to conceive became pregnant. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of pregnancy at 12 months and 24 months were 47.1% (95% CI: 34.5%, 58.8%) and 63.8% (95% CI: 52.5%, 72.9%), respectively. The median pregnancy time was 22 months (95% CI: 14.2, 29.8) after VR and 12 months (95% CI: 8.3, 15.7, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon P = 0.021) after HR. Among patients with subsequent infertility, 31.6% achieved pregnancy by unassisted mode and 29.8% by IVF/ICSI. Moreover, among patients with previously failed IVF/ICSI treatment, 60% (12/20) obtained pregnancy, including 71.4% (10/14) after HR and 33.3% (2/6) after VR.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic resection is as effective as vaginal repair at relieving symptoms of CSD-associated prolonged menses. Hysteroscopic resection is the modality of choice with an improvement in prolonged menses for small niche, while vaginal might be considered for a large niche. Furthermore, surgical intervention could improve the clinical pregnancy rate of CSD patients. All of these provide evidence for the individualized management of CSD.

Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis

The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review was to provide a strategic analysis, in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis), of the current evidence regarding the management of uterine isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect). Strengths include the fact that isthmocele can be diagnosed on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, and that surgical repair may restore natural fertility potential and prevent secondary infertility, as well as reduce the risk of miscarriage and other obstetric complications. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the best diagnostic method and criteria, as well as the potential benefits of surgical repair with respect to fertility. There is a need for experienced surgeons skilled in the various isthmocele repair techniques. Isthmocele repair does not prevent the need for Cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies. There is increasing awareness regarding the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing isthmocele. This may lead to surgical correction and prevention of obstetric and perinatal complications in subsequent pregnancies, including Cesarean scar pregnancy. Regarding threats, the existence of different surgical techniques means that there is a risk of selecting an inadequate approach if the type of isthmocele and the patient's characteristics are not considered. There is a risk of overtreatment when asymptomatic defects are repaired surgically. Finally, there is an absence of cost-effectiveness analyses to justify routine repair. Thus, while there are many data suggesting that isthmocele has an adverse effect on both natural fertility and the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques, high-quality evidence to support surgical isthmocele repair in all asymptomatic patients desiring future fertility are lacking. There is increasing agreement to recommend hysteroscopic repair of isthmocele as a first-line approach as long as the residual myometrial thickness is at least 2.5-3.0 mm. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Cesarean scar disorder: Management and repair

Cesarean scar disorder (CSD) is an entity recently defined as uterine niche with at least one primary or 2 secondary symptoms. CSDs can be visualized by hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging, but diagnosis should be performed by exams able to measure the residual myometrial thickness (RMT). Although there is a limited number of studies evaluating fertility and reproductive outcomes after different types of surgery, the following consideration should be kept in mind. Asymptomatic women should not be operated with the hope of improving obstetrical outcomes. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be offered according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and RMT measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique in case of RMT <3 mm. In this instance, repair is essential and can only be achieved by a laparoscopic or vaginal approach. The benefit of laparoscopic approach seems to persist after subsequent CS. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made.

The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - A systematic review

Of all neonates, 21% are delivered by cesarean section (CS). A long-term maternal complication of an SC is a uterine niche. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on imaging techniques and niche-related symptomatology. We performed systematic searches on imaging and niche symptoms. For both searches, 87 new studies were included. Niche evaluation by transvaginal sonography (TVS) or contrast sonohysterography (SHG) proved superior over hysteroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. Studies that used SHG in a random population identified a niche prevalence of 42%-84%. Niche prevalence differed based on niche definition, symptomatology, and imaging technique. Most studies reported an association with gynecological symptoms, poor reproductive outcomes, obstetrical complications, and reduced quality of life. In conclusion, non-invasive TVS and SHG are the superior imaging modalities to diagnose a niche. Niches are prevalent and strongly associated with gynecological symptoms and poor reproductive outcomes.

Comparing the clinical efficacy of three surgical methods for cesarean scar pregnancy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of three surgical methods in the treatment of various types of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

METHODS

Herein, 314 cases of CSP were treated in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University between June 2017 and June 2020. The patients were divided into three groups based on the treatment received: group A (n = 146; curettage by pituitrin combined with ultrasonic monitoring and hysteroscopy-guided surgery), group B [n = 90; curettage after methotrexate (MTX) injection into the local gestational sac], and group C (n = 78; laparoscopic, transvaginal, and transabdominal cesarean scar resection). These groups were divided into three subgroups (type I, type II, and type III) according to the CSP type of the patients.

RESULTS

The intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, menstrual recovery time, and serum β-HCG normalization time were lower in groups A than in groups B or C with type I, II and III CSP (P < 0.05). Operative efficiency and Successful second pregnancy rate were higher in groups A than in groups B or C with type I and II CSP (P < 0.05). But in type III CSP, the complications were more serious in group A than group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Curettage by pituitrin combined with ultrasonic monitoring and hysteroscopy-guided surgery is an effective and relatively safe treatment for patients with type I and II CSP. Laparoscopic surgery is more suitable for type III CSP.

Comparative effectiveness of transvaginal repair vs. hysteroscopic resection in patients with symptomatic uterine niche

Objective

To compare the efficacy of transvaginal repair and hysteroscopic resection in improving niche associated postmenstrual spotting.

Methods

The improvement rate of postmenstrual spotting in women who underwent transvaginal repair or hysteroscopic resection treatment was assessed retrospectively in patients accepted at the Niche Sub-Specialty Clinic in International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital between June 2017 and June 2019. Postoperative spotting symptom within one year after surgery, pre- and postoperative anatomical indicators, women' satisfaction with menstruation and other perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups.

Results

68 patients in the transvaginal group and 70 patients in the hysteroscopic group were included for analysis. The improvement rate of postmenstrual spotting in the transvaginal group at the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months after surgery was 87%, 88%, 84%, and 85%, significantly higher than 61%, 68%, 66%, and 68% in the hysteroscopic group, respectively (P < 0.05). The total days of spotting improved significantly at the 3rd month after surgery but did not change over time within one year in each group (P > 0.05). After surgery, the disappearance rates of the niche are 68% in transvaginal group and 38% in hysteroscopic group, however, hysteroscopic resection had shorter operative time and hospitalization duration, less complications, and lower hospitalization costs.

Conclusion

Both treatments can improve the spotting symptom and anatomical structures of uterine lower segments with niches. Transvaginal repair is better in thickening the residual myometrium than hysteroscopic resection, however, hysteroscopic resection has shorter operative time and hospitalization duration, less complications, and lower hospitalization costs.

Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review

Background

Cesarean scar defects (CSD) are caused by cesarean sections and cause various symptoms. Although there has been no previous consensus on the name of this condition for a long time, it has been named cesarean scar disorder (CSDi).

Methods

This review summarizes the definition, prevalence, and etiology of CSD, as well as the pathophysiology and treatment of CSDi. We focused on surgical therapy and examined the effects and procedures of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, and transvaginal surgery.

Main findings

The definition of CSD was proposed as an anechoic lesion with a depth of at least 2 mm because of the varied prevalence, owing to the lack of consensus. CSD incidence depends on the number of times, procedure, and situation of cesarean sections. Histopathological findings in CSD are fibrosis and adenomyosis, and chronic inflammation in the uterine and pelvic cavities decreases fertility in women with CSDi. Although the surgical procedures are not standardized, laparoscopic, hysteroscopic, and transvaginal surgeries are effective.

Conclusion

The cause and pathology of CSDi are becoming clear. However, there is variability in the prevalence and treatment strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further studies using the same definitions.

A case report of an endometriosis cyst at cesarean scar defect and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar defect (CSD) presents as a cystic defect that connects the uterine cavity at the site of the previous cesarean section (CS). Endometriosis refers to the discovery of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. Cases of endometriosis cysts at CSD have not been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this article, we will present a patient with an endometriosis cyst at CSD with symptoms of a prolonged menstrual cycle, periods without cyclic abdominal pain, and a history of cesarean delivery. The gynecologic ultrasound showed a CSD and a mixed mass in the right front of the uterus. After about 1 month, the tumor grew from a diameter of 4.75 cm to 8.06 × 6.23 × 3.66 cm. The patient eventually had an operation, which revealed a mass protruding from the incision in the anterior uterine wall, which was attached to the anterior uterine wall by a thin tip with a smooth surface. Intraoperative rapid cytopathology suggested that endometrial glands were seen within the smooth muscle tissue, similar to endometriosis. Subsequently, the patient underwent resection of the endometriotic cyst. Final paraffin pathology showed smooth muscle with visible endometrial glands and old hemorrhage, and a one-year follow-up showed no recurrence of endometriosis cysts at CSD.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometriosis cysts at CSD are very rare. The clinical symptoms may be less obvious, and the diagnosis relies mainly on the patient's previous surgical history and imaging. A finding of a pelvic mass in the location of the CSD, with or without symptoms of menstrual changes and intermittent abdominal pain, should be considered an endometriotic cyst at CSD. Surgical treatment is a good choice for this disease. Further studies are needed regarding the etiological mechanism of this case and why the mass enlarged rapidly in one mouth.

Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the published literature to better understand the association between cesarean scar defects (CSDs) and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). In particular, we aimed to evaluate the risk and pattern(s) of CSD-associated AUB in addition to exploring the relationship between defect morphology with bleeding symptoms.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Patients with CSD and reports of uterine bleeding as an outcome were identified in 60 studies from database searches.

INTERVENTIONS

Studies that investigated CSD (as defined by investigators) and reported uterine bleeding, menstrual bleeding, or AUB as an outcome were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence and risk of AUB (intermenstrual, postmenstrual, and unscheduled bleeding) in patients with confirmed CSD.

RESULTS

Nine studies reported on the prevalence of AUB in patients with a confirmed CSD. Patients with CSD were more likely to experience AUB, compared with those without CSD (relative risk, 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-5.97; 6 studies, 1,385 patients; I² = 67%). In a population of patients with at least 1 cesarean delivery, the prevalence of AUB in those with CSD was 25.5% (95% CI, 14.7-40.5; 6 studies, 667 patients, I² = 93%). However, symptom prevalence was much higher in patients presenting for imaging for a gynecologic indication where the prevalence of AUB in the presence of a CSD was 76.4% (95% CI, 67.8-83.3; 5 studies, 505 patients; I² = 71%). The mean menstrual duration in symptomatic patients with CSD was 13.4 days (95% CI, 12.6-14.2; 19 studies, 2,095 patients; I² = 96%), and the mean duration of early-cycle intermenstrual bleeding was 6.8 days (95% CI, 5.7-7.8 days; 9 studies, 759 patients; I² = 93%). The most common descriptor of CSD-associated AUB was "brown discharge". Patients with larger CSD experienced more bleeding symptoms.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong and consistent association between patients with CSD and AUB. These patients experience a unique bleeding pattern, namely prolonged menstruation and early-cycle intermenstrual bleeding. These data should provide impetus for including CSD as a distinct entity in AUB classification systems. High heterogeneity in our results calls for standardization of nomenclature and outcome reporting for this condition.

Hysteroscopic management of caesarean scar defects

A caesarean section may lead to a defect of the myometrium at the site of the uterine scar. The association with abnormal uterine bleeding or impaired fertility has been demonstrated. Hysteroscopic remodelling reportedly reduces the symptoms. To review the available literature reporting on hysteroscopic treatment of these defects in symptomatic women with abnormal uterine bleeding or impaired fertility. A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane databases has been performed until January 2021, including 27 articles. Hysteroscopic remodelling relieved symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding in 60-100% and 25-100% of women with impaired fertility conceived within the follow up period. No major complications were reported. Hysteroscopic remodelling seems a treatment option in the management of symptomatic caesarean scar defects. Long-term follow-up and larger studies are needed to evaluate the effect on abnormal uterine bleeding as well as on reproductive outcomes.