Next-Generation Sequencing: A Novel Approach to Distinguish Multifocal Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas from Intrapulmonary Metastases

Multiple primary lung cancer: Updates and perspectives

Management of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) remains challenging, partly due to its increasing incidence, especially with the significant rise in cases of multiple lung nodules caused by low-dose computed tomography screening. Moreover, the indefinite pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment selection add to the complexity. In recent years, there have been continuous efforts to dissect the molecular characteristics of MPLC and explore new diagnostic approaches as well as treatment modalities, which will be reviewed here, with a focus on newly emerging evidence and future perspectives, hope to provide new insights into the management of MPLC and serve as inspiration for future research related to MPLC.

Pathologic Assessment and Staging of Multiple Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: A Paradigm Shift with the Emerging Role of Molecular Methods

Non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) commonly present as 2 or more separate tumors. Biologically, this encompasses 2 distinct processes: separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs), representing independently arising tumors, and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs), representing intrapulmonary spread of a single tumor. The advent of computed tomography imaging has substantially increased the detection of multifocal NSCLCs. The strategies and approaches for distinguishing between SPLCs and IPMs have evolved significantly over the years. Recently, genomic sequencing of somatic mutations has been widely adopted to identify targetable alterations in NSCLC. These molecular techniques have enabled pathologists to reliably discern clonal relationships among multiple NSCLCs in clinical practice. However, a standardized approach to evaluating and staging multiple NSCLCs using molecular methods is still lacking. Here, we reviewed the historical context and provided an update on the growing applications of genomic testing as a clinically relevant benchmark for determining clonal relationships in multiple NSCLCs, a practice we have designated "comparative molecular profiling." We examined the strengths and limitations of the morphology-based distinction of SPLCs vs IPMs and highlighted pivotal clinical and pathologic insights that have emerged from studying multiple NSCLCs using genomic approaches as a gold standard. Lastly, we suggest a practical approach for evaluating multiple NSCLCs in the clinical setting, considering the varying availability of molecular techniques.

Case report: Targeted sequencing facilitates the diagnosis and management of rare multifocal pure ground-glass opacities with intrapulmonary metastasis

Introduction

Treatments for multiple ground-glass opacities (GGOs) for which the detection rate is increasing are still controversial. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may provide additional key evidence for differential diagnosis or optimal therapeutic schedules.

Case presentation

We first reported a rare case in which more than 100 bilateral pulmonary GGOs (91.7% of the GGOs were pure GGOs) were diagnosed as both multiple primary lung cancer and intrapulmonary metastasis. We performed NGS with an 808-gene panel to assess both somatic and germline alterations in tissues and plasma. The patient (male) underwent three successive surgeries and received osimertinib adjuvant therapy due to signs of metastasis and multiple EGFR-mutated tumors. The patient had multiple pure GGOs, and eight tumors of four pathological subtypes were evaluated for the clonal relationship. Metastasis, including pure GGOs and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, was found between two pairs of tumors. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring of disease status may impact clinical decision-making.

Conclusions

Surgery combined with targeted therapies remains a reasonable alternative strategy for treating patients with multifocal GGOs, and NGS is valuable for facilitating diagnostic workup and adjuvant therapy with targeted drugs through tissue and disease monitoring via ctDNA.

Genomic heterogeneity of multiple synchronous lung cancers in Chinese population

INTRODUCTION

It is clinically challenging to infer the phylogenetic relationship between different tumor lesions of patients with multiple synchronous lung cancers (MSLC), whether these lesions are the result of independently evolved tumor or intrapulmonary metastases.

METHODS

We used the Illumina X10 platform to sequence 128 stage I lung cancer samples collected from 64 patients with MSLC. All samples were analyzed for mutation spectra and phylogenetic inference.

RESULTS

We detected genetic aberrations within genes previously reported to be recurrently altered in lung adenocarcinoma including, EGFR, ERBB2, TP53, BRAF, and KRAS. Other putative driver mutations identified were enriched in RTK-RAS signaling, TP53 signaling, and cell cycle. Also, we found some interesting cases, two cases that carried EGFR L858R and T790M co-mutation in one tumor and another tumor with only EGFR 19del, and 1 case with two KRAS hotspots in the same tumor. Due to the short follow-up time and early stage, further investigation is needed to determine whether this unique mutation profile will affect their progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Regarding genetic evolution analysis among 64 tumor samples, 50 of them display distinct mutational profiles, suggesting these are independently evolved tumors, which is consistent with histopathological assessment. On the other hand, six patients were identified to be intrapulmonary metastasis as the mutations harbored in different lesions are clonally related.

CONCLUSION

In summary, unlike intrapulmonary metastases, patients with MSLC harbor distinct genomic profiles in different tumor lesions, and we could distinguish MSLC from intrapulmonary metastases via clonality estimation.

A pairwise radiomics algorithm-lesion pair relation estimation model for distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer from intrapulmonary metastasis

Background

Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is critical for their disparate treatment strategy and prognosis. This study aimed to establish a non-invasive model to make the differentiation pre-operatively.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 168 patients with multiple lung cancers (307 pairs of lesions) including 118 cases for modeling and internal validation, and 50 cases for independent external validation. Radiomic features on computed tomography (CT) were extracted to calculate the absolute deviation of paired lesions. Features were then selected by correlation coefficients and random forest classifier 5-fold cross-validation, based on which the lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model was developed. A major voting strategy was used to decide diagnosis for cases with multiple pairs of lesions. Cases from another institute were included as the external validation set for the PRE model to compete with two experienced clinicians.

Results

Seven radiomic features were selected for the PRE model construction. With major voting strategy, the mean area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the training versus internal validation versus external validation cohort to distinguish MPLC were 0.983 versus 0.844 versus 0.793, 0.942 versus 0.846 versus 0.760, 0.905 versus 0.728 versus 0.727, and 0.962 versus 0.910 versus 0.769, respectively. AUCs of the two clinicians were 0.619 and 0.580.

Conclusions

The CT radiomic feature-based lesion PRE model is potentially an accurate diagnostic tool for the differentiation of MPLC and IPM, which could help with clinical decision making.

Progress in genome-inspired treatment decisions for multifocal lung adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Multifocal lung adenocarcinoma (MFLA) is becoming increasingly recognized as a distinct subset of lung cancer, with unique biology, disease course, and treatment outcomes. While definitions remain controversial, MFLA is characterized by the development and concurrent presence of multiple independent (non-metastatic) lesions on the lung adenocarcinoma spectrum. Disease progression typically follows an indolent course measured in years, with a lower propensity for nodal and distant metastases than other more common forms of non-small cell lung cancer.

AREAS COVERED

Traditional imaging and histopathological analyses of tumor biopsies are frequently unable to fully characterize the disease, prompting interest in molecular diagnosis. We highlight some of the key questions in the field, including accurate definitions to identify and stage MLFA, molecular tests to stratify patients and treatment decisions, and the lack of clinical trial data to delineate best management for this poorly understood subset of lung cancer patients. We review the existing literature and progress toward a genomic diagnosis for this unique disease entity.

EXPERT OPINION

Multifocal lung adenocarcinoma behaves differently than other forms of non-small cell lung cancer. Progress in molecular diagnosis may enhance potential for accurate definition, diagnosis, and optimizing treatment approach.

Towards the molecular era of discriminating multiple lung cancers

In the era of histopathology-based diagnosis, the discrimination between multiple lung cancers (MLCs) poses significant uncertainties and has thus become a clinical dilemma. However, recent significant advances and increased application of molecular technologies in clonal relatedness assessment have led to more precision in distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPMs). This review summarizes recent advances in the molecular identification of MLCs and compares various methods based on somatic mutations, chromosome alterations, microRNAs, and tumor microenvironment markers. The paper also discusses current challenges at the forefront of genomics-based discrimination, including the selection of detection technology, application of next-generation sequencing, and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). In summary, this paper highlights an entrance into the primary stage of molecule-based diagnostics.

Comparison of the Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Intramural Metastases and Multiple Primary Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to distinguish esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with intramural metastases (IM) from multiple primary oesophageal carcinoma (MPEC). Nevertheless, there are significant differences in their prognoses and treatments. Therefore, our study aims to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of these two entities and to provide clues for differential diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 6304 patients who underwent esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. The clinicopathological and prognostic features of patients with IM and MPEC were evaluated. P53 and Rb1 were detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using a tissue microarray.

RESULTS

Among the 6304 patients, 127 (2.0%) had IM, and 138 (2.2%) had MPEC. Patients with IM were more likely to have an advanced pT (p < 0.001), pN (p < 0.001), more lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001) and neural invasion (p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with IM had an extremely poor prognosis compared to those with MPEC, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 18.9% and 56.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, IM was found to be an independent poor prognostic indicator for OS and DFS. In the IM group, all patients showed consistent p53 expression in both primary and IM foci. Of note, Rb1 loss was found in 3 pairs of primary foci and metastases, along with p53 nonsense mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IM had more risk factors and extremely worse prognosis than those with MPEC. It is essential to discriminate IM from MPEC when managing multifocal carcinomas. IHC staining of p53 and Rb1 may aid in differential diagnosis.

Genomic Profiling With Large-Scale Next-Generation Sequencing Panels Distinguishes Separate Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases

The distinction between different separate primary lung cancers (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is a challenging but clinically significant issue. Histopathology-based classification is the current practice; however, it is subjective and affected by interobserver variability. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels have been used in lung cancer diagnostics. This study aimed to investigate the value of large-scale NGS panels for distinguishing between SPLCs and IPMs. A total of 32 patients with 69 lung adenocarcinomas were included. Comprehensive histopathologic assessments of multiple pulmonary adenocarcinomas were performed independently by 3 pathologists. The consensus of histopathologic classification was determined by a majority vote. Genomic analysis was performed using an amplicon-based large-scale NGS panel, targeting single-nucleotide variants and short insertions and deletions in 409 genes. Tumor pairs were classified as SPLCs or IPMs according to a predefined molecular classification algorithm. Using NGS and our molecular classification algorithm, 97.6% of the tumor pairs can be unambiguously classified as SPLCs or IPMs. The molecular classification was predictive of postoperative clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival (P = .015) and recurrence-free interval (P = .0012). There was a moderate interobserver agreement regarding histopathologic classification (κ = 0.524 at the tumor pair level). The concordance between histopathologic and molecular classification was 100% in cases where pathologists reached a complete agreement but only 53.3% where they did not. This study showed that large-scale NGS panels are a powerful modality that can help distinguish SPLCs from IPMs in patients with multiple lung adenocarcinomas and objectively provide accurate risk stratification.

A novel NGS-based diagnostic algorithm for classifying multifocal lung adenocarcinomas in pN0M0 patients

The classification of multifocal lung adenocarcinomas (MLAs), including multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas (MPLAs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs), has great clinical significance in staging and treatment determination. However, the application of molecular approaches in pN0M0 MLA diagnosis has not been well investigated. Here, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in 45 pN0M0 MLA patients (101 lesion pairs) who were initially diagnosed as having MPLA by comprehensive histologic assessment (CHA). Five additional patients with intrathoracic metastases were used as positive controls, while 197 patients with unifocal lung adenocarcinomas (425 random lesion pairs) were used as negative controls. By utilizing a predefined NGS criterion, all IPMs in the positive control group could be accurately classified, whereas 13 lesion pairs (3.1%) in the negative control cohort were misdiagnosed as IPMs. Additionally, 14 IPM lesion pairs were diagnosed in the study group, with at least 7 misdiagnoses. We thus developed a refined algorithm, incorporating both NGS and histologic results, that could correctly diagnose all the known MPLAs and IPMs. In particular, all IPMs identified by the refined algorithm were diagnosed to be IPMs or suspected IPMs by CHA reassessment. The refined algorithm-diagnosed MPLAs patients also had significantly better progression-free survival than the refined algorithm-diagnosed IPMs (p < 0.0001), which is superior to conventional NGS or CHA diagnoses. Overall, we developed an NGS-based algorithm that could accurately distinguish IPMs from MPLAs in MLA patients. Our results demonstrate a promising clinical utility of NGS to complement traditional CHA-based MLA diagnosis and help determine patient staging and treatment.

Differential Diagnostic Value of Histology in MPLC and IPM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The paramount issue regarding multiple lung cancer (MLC) is whether it represents multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM), as this directly affects both accurate staging and subsequent clinical management. As a classic method, histology has been widely utilized in clinical practice. However, studies examining the clinical value of histology in MLC have yielded inconsistent results; thus, this remains to be evaluated. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the differential diagnostic value of histology in MPLC and IPM and to provide evidence-based medicine for clinical work.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to collect relevant literature according to PRISMA, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were set up to screen and assess the literature. The data required for reconstructing a 2 × 2 contingency table were extracted directly or calculated indirectly from the included studies, and statistical analysis was carried out by using Stata 15, Meta-DiSc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 34 studies including 1,075 pairs of tumors were included in this meta-analysis. Among these studies, 11 were about the M-M standard and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71–0.84) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.38–0.55), respectively; 20 studies were about CHA and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72–0.80) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68–0.79), respectively; and 3 studies were about the “CHA & Lepidic” criteria and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85–0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.21–0.73), respectively. The combined pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and the area under the SROC curve of the 34 studies were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51–0.76), 2.25 (95% CI: 1.59–3.17), 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23–0.43), 7.22 (95% CI: 4.06–12.81), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.84), respectively.

Conclusion

The current evidence indicated that histology had a moderate differential diagnostic value between MPLC and IPM. Among the three subgroups, the “CHA & Lepidic” criteria showed the highest sensitivity and CHA showed the highest specificity. Further research is necessary to validate these findings and to improve clinical credibility.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022298180.

The Role of Whole Exome Sequencing in Distinguishing Primary and Secondary Lung Cancers

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that presents with multiple lung tumors (MLTs) poses a challenge to accurate staging and prognosis. MLTs that arise as clonally related secondary metastases from a common primary are higher stage and often require adjuvant chemotherapy or may in fact be incurable stage IV lesions. Conversely, MLTs that represent distinct primaries have a better prognosis and may be overtreated if inappropriately classified as related secondaries. Historically, pathologic and radiographic criteria were used to distinguish between primary and secondary MLTs; however, the advent of genomic profiling has demonstrated limitations to these historic classification systems. In this review, we discuss the use of molecular profiling to distinguish between primary and secondary lung cancers, with a focus on the insights gleaned from whole exome sequencing (WES) analyses. While WES is not yet feasible in routine clinical practice, WES studies have helped elucidate the clonal relationship between primary and secondary lung cancers and provide important context for the application of targeted sequencing panel-based analyses.

Genetic and immune characteristics of multiple primary lung cancers and lung metastases

Background

To explore the genetic and immunophenotyping heterogeneities between patients with intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) or multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC).

Methods

Whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA‐seq) were performed on the tissue and blood samples of IPM and MPLC patients to comprehensively analyze the clonal evolution, molecular typing and immunophenotyping.

Results

There was no significant difference in genetic mutation, tumor mutational burden (TMB) value and mutant allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) value between IPM and MPLC patients. Notably, the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) appeared in all IPM patients, while there was also no significant difference between the two groups. In addition, expression of immune checkpoint‐related genes including CTLA‐4, BTLA, TIGIT and HAVCR2 in the MPLC group was significantly higher than those in IPM group. At the same time, 86 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were observed between IPM and MPLC patients with transcriptome sequencing, of which 56 DEGs were upregulated and 30 were downregulated in the IPM group compared with the MPLC group. The cluster analysis revealed that the 86 DEGs could be distinguished in IPM and MPLC samples. Moreover, only the infiltration levels of CD56dim natural killer cells in the IPM group was significantly higher than that in the MPLC group, and the infiltration levels of the remaining 27 immune cell subsets were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

IPM and MPLC are roughly similar in genetic and immune characteristics indicating that genomics alone may not be able to effectively distinguish between IPM and MPLC, which still needs to be comprehensively evaluated with clinical manifestations, imaging, and pathological characteristics.

The Emerging Importance of Tumor Genomics in Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

During the last two decades, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has played a key role in enhancing non-small cell lung cancer treatment paradigms through the application of "targeted therapy" in advanced and metastatic disease. The use of specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with oncogenic driver alterations, such as EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600E, MET, and NTRK mutations, among others, has changed treatment approaches and improved outcomes in patients with late-stage disease. Although NGS technology has mostly been used in the setting of systemic therapy to identify targets, response to therapy, and mechanisms of resistance, it has multiple potential applications for patients with earlier-stage disease, as well. In this review, we discuss the emerging role of NGS technologies to better understand tumor biology in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are undergoing surgery with curative intent. In this patient cohort, we examine tumor heterogeneity, the underlying tumor genomics associated with lung adenocarcinoma subtypes, the prediction of recurrence after complete surgical resection, the use of plasma circulating tumor DNA for detection of early cancers and monitoring for minimal residual disease, the differentiation of separate primaries from intrapulmonary metastases, and the use of NGS to guide induction and adjuvant therapies.

Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas With Spatially Separate Lung Lesions: Analysis of Clonal Relationship by Comparative Molecular Profiling

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMAs) often present with spatially separate lung lesions. Clonal relationship between such lesions, particularly those involving contralateral lobes, is not well established. Here, we used comparative genomic profiling to address this question.

METHODS

Patients with genomic analysis performed on two IMAs located in different lung regions were identified. Molecular assays included DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for 410 to 468 genes (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), RNA-based NGS for 62 genes (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Fusion), or non-NGS assays.

RESULTS

Comparative genomic profiling was performed on two separate IMAs in 24 patients, of whom 19 had contralateral lesions. Tumors from all but one patient shared matching driver alterations, including KRAS (n = 19), NRG1 (n = 2), ERBB2 (n = 1) or BRAF (n = 1). In addition, in patients with paired tumors profiled by NGS (n = 12), shared driver alterations were accompanied by up to 4 (average 2.6) other identical mutations, further supporting the clonal relationship between the tumors. Only in a single patient separate IMAs harbored entirely nonoverlapping mutation profiles, supporting clonally unrelated, distinct primary tumors. Notably, in a subset of patients (n = 3), molecular testing confirmed a clonal relationship between the original resected IMAs and subsequent contralateral IMA presenting after an extremely long latency (8.1-11.7 y).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparative molecular profiling supports that nearly all separate pulmonary IMA lesions represent intrapulmonary spread arising from a single tumor and documents a subset with a remarkably protracted course of intrapulmonary progression. This study reinforces the unique biology and clinical behavior of IMAs while further highlighting the value of genomic testing for clarifying the clonal relationship between multiple lung carcinomas.

Case Report: A Rare Case of Metachronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancers in a Patient With Successful Management by Switching From Anti-PD-1 Therapy to Anti-PD-L1 Therapy

Without global standard diagnostic criteria, distinguishing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) from intrapulmonary metastasis or histologic transformation has been a big challenge in clinical practice. Here, we described a rare case of metachronous adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a patient who developed drug resistance to pembrolizumab. Both DNA-sequencing and RNA-sequencing were performed on primary adenocarcinoma and resistant lesions. Through the comparison of primary adenocarcinoma and novel lesion mutation profiles, along with bioinformatic estimation of immune proportion by using RNA sequence data, we revealed the origin and tumor microenvironment of the two lesions. No shared mutations were detected between lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and SCLC from the same patient, suggesting these two lesions might be from separate primary lung cancers. Compared to LUAD, SCLC showed a relatively cold microenvironment, including negative PD-L1. The patient obtained durable clinical benefits upon treatment with atezolizumab, without experiencing immune-related adverse events. Disease progression should be monitored with prompt re-biopsy and molecular profiling to spot a potential histologic change and to shed light on therapeutic alternatives. The use of atezolizumab, either alone or in combination with other agents, may be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with both LUAD and SCLC.

Molecular Identification and Genetic Characterization of Early-Stage Multiple Primary Lung Cancer by Large-Panel Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis

Objective

The incidence of early stage multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasing in recent years, while the ideal strategy for its diagnosis and treatment remains controversial. The present study conducted genomic analysis to identify a new molecular classification method for accurately predicting the diagnosis and therapy for patients with early stage MPLC.

Methods

A total of 240 tissue samples from 203 patients with multiple-non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) (n = 30), early stage single-NSCLC (Group A, n = 94), and advanced-stage NSCLC (Group B, n = 79) were subjected to targeted multigene panel sequencing.

Results

Thirty patients for whom next-generation sequencing was performed on >1 tumor were identified, yielding 45 tumor pairs. The frequencies of EGFR, TP53, RBM10, ERBB2, and CDKN2A mutations exhibited significant differences between early and advanced-stage NSCLCs. The prevalence of the EGFR L858R mutation in early stage NSCLC was remarkably higher than that in advanced-stage NSCLC (P = 0.047). The molecular method classified tumor pairs into 26 definite MPLC tumors and four intrapulmonary metastasis (IM) tumors. A high rate of discordance in driver genetic alterations was found in the different tumor lesions of MPLC patients. The prospective Martini histologic prediction of MPLC was discordant with the molecular method for three patients (16.7%), particularly in the prediction of IM (91.7% discordant).

Conclusions

Comprehensive molecular evaluation allows the unambiguous delineation of clonal relationships among tumors. In comparison, the Martini and Melamed criteria have notable limitations in the recognition of IM. Our results support the adoption of a large panel to supplement histology for strongly discriminating NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

Mutational landscape of multiple primary lung cancers and its correlation with non-intrinsic risk factors

Multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) harbour various genetic profiles among the tumours, even from individuals with same non-intrinsic risk factors. Paired mutational analyses were performed to obtain a census of mutational events in MPLC and assess their relationship with non-intrinsic risk factors. Thirty-eight surgical specimens from 17 patients diagnosed as MPLC were used. Extracted DNAs were sequenced for somatic mutations in 409 cancer-associated genes from a comprehensive cancer panel. We statistically analysed the correlation between each driver mutation frequency and non-intrinsic risk factors using Fisher's exact test, and whether genetic mutations occurred concomitantly or randomly in MPLC using an exact test. Comprehensive genetic analyses suggested different mutation profiles in tumours within the same individuals, with some exceptions. EGFR, KRAS, TP53, or PARP1 mutations were concomitantly detected in some MPLC cases. EGFR mutations were significantly more frequent in never or light smokers and females. Concomitant EGFR or KRAS mutations in MPLCs were significantly more frequent than expected by chance (P = .0023 and .0049, respectively) suggesting a more prominent role of non-intrinsic risk factors in EGFR and KRAS mutations than other mutations, which occurred more randomly. Concomitant EGFR or KRAS mutations were particularly prominent in never or light smokers and males.

Does histological assessment accurately distinguish separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases? A study of paired resected lung nodules in 32 patients using a routine next-generation sequencing panel for driver mutations

AIM

Various approaches have been reported for distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases in patients with two lung nodules. The aim of this study was to determine whether histological assessment is reliable and accurate in distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases using routine molecular findings as an adjunct.

METHODS

We studied resected tumour pairs from 32 patients with lung adenocarcinomas in different lobes. In 15 of 32 tumour pairs, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for common driver mutations was performed on both nodules. The remainder of tumour pairs underwent limited NGS, or EGFR genotyping. Tumour pairs with different drivers (or one driver/one wild-type) were classified as molecularly unrelated, while those with identical low-frequency drivers were classified as related. Three pathologists independently and blinded to the molecular results categorised tumour pairs as related or unrelated based on histological assessment.

RESULTS

Of 32 pairs, 15 were classified as related by histological assessment, and 17 as unrelated. Of 15 classified as related by histology, 6 were classified as related by molecular analysis, 4 were unrelated and 5 were indeterminate. Of 17 classified as unrelated by histology, 14 were classified as unrelated by molecular analysis, none was related and 3 were indeterminate. Histological assessment of relatedness was inaccurate in 4/32 (12.5%) tumour pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

A small but significant subset of two-nodule adenocarcinoma pairs is inaccurately judged as related by histological assessment, and can be proven to be unrelated by molecular analysis (driver gene mutations), leading to significant downstaging.

A multidisciplinary approach for the differential diagnosis between multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas and intrapulmonary metastases

PURPOSE

The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases has a significant impact on tumor staging and therapeutic choices. Several criteria have been proposed to solve this diagnostic issue, but a definitive consensus is still missing. We tested the efficacy of a combined clinical, histopathological and molecular ("real world") approach for the correct classification of multiple lung tumors in a selected cohort of patients.

METHODS

24 multiple lung tumors with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma from 10 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological, pathological and clinical information, including follow-up, were integrated with molecular profiling via a routine multigene panel sequencing.

RESULTS

Comprehensive histologic assessment revealed readily distinguishable histologic patterns between multiple tumors suggesting unrelated lesions in 7 cases, in agreement with clinical, radiological and molecular data, thus leading to final diagnosis of MPLCs. In the remaining 3 cases, the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and intrapulmonary metastases was challenging, since the histologic features of the lesions were similar or identical. The final interpretation (2 MPLCs and 1 most likely intrapulmonary metastases) was reached thanks to the integration of all available data, and was confirmed by follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach including a routinely affordable multigene panel sequencing is a useful tool to discriminate MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastases in multiple lung nodules sharing the adenocarcinoma histotype.

Application of large-scale targeted sequencing to distinguish multiple lung primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases

The effective differentiation between multiple primary lung tumors (MPs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IMs) in patients is imperative to discover the exact disease stage and to select the most appropriate treatment. In this study, the authors was to evaluate the efficacy and validity of large-scale targeted sequencing (LSTS) as a supplement to estimate whether multifocal lung cancers (MLCs) are primary or metastatic. Targeted sequencing of 520 cancer-related oncogenes was performed on 36 distinct tumors from 16 patients with MPs. Pairing analysis was performed to evaluate the somatic mutation pattern of MLCs in each patient. A total of 25 tumor pairs from 16 patients were sequenced, 88% (n = 22) of which were classified as MPs by LSTS, consistent with clinical diagnosis. One tumor pair from a patient with lymph node metastases had highly consistent somatic mutation profiles, thus predicted as a primary-metastatic pair. In addition, some matched mutations were observed in the remaining two paired ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and classified as high-probability IMs by LSTS. Our study revealed that LSTS can potentially facilitate the distinction of MPs from IMs. In addition, our results provide new genomic evidence of the presence of cancer invasion in GGNs, even pure GGNs.

Multiple Primary Lung Cancers: A New Challenge in the Era of Precision Medicine

With the widespread implementation of lung cancer screening, more and more patients are being diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). In the era of precision medicine, many controversies remain in differentiating MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis and the optimum treatment choice, especially in patients exhibiting similar histology. In this review, we summarize common diagnostic criteria and novel discrimination methods with a special emphasis on the emerging value of broad panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the diagnosis of MPLCs. We then discuss current advances regarding therapeutic approaches for MPLCs. Radical surgery is the main treatment modality, while stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is safe and feasible for early-stage MPLC patients with inoperable tumors. In addition, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are emerging therapeutic strategies that are still in their infancy. Characteristics of both genomic profiles and tumor microenvironment are currently being evaluated but warrant further exploration to facilitate the application of targeted systematic therapies in MPLC patients.

Distinguishing multiple lung primaries from intra-pulmonary metastases and treatment implications

INTRODUCTION

The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers and intra-pulmonary metastases has been extensively investigated because of its important clinical and therapeutic implications.

AREAS COVERED

Rapidly improving imaging technology and genomic analysis has led to a finer discrimination between multiple primary lung tumors and pulmonary metastases. However, over the past few decades, standardized criteria for the identification of multiple lung tumors have been lacking. Therefore, in 2017 a multidisciplinary international committee composed of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) addressed this problem when drawing up the 8th edition of TMN stage classification, that now represents a specific consensus on this topic. The most advanced diagnostic strategies associated with screening allow for the detection of early stage synchronous lung cancers.

EXPERT OPINION

Although diagnostic confirmation relies on pathologic and clinical examination, new molecular analyses help in the discrimination between primary and secondary tumors. The treatment of multiple primary lung tumors remains, whenever possible, a local treatment based on surgical resection, providing the absence of distant or local (lymph node) metastases.

Validation and clinical application of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel for solid and hematologic malignancies

Background

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a high-throughput technology that has become widely integrated in molecular diagnostics laboratories. Among the large diversity of NGS-based panels, the Trusight Tumor 26 (TsT26) enables the detection of low-frequency variants across 26 genes using the MiSeq platform.

Methods

We describe the inter-laboratory validation and subsequent clinical application of the panel in 399 patients presenting a range of tumor types, including gastrointestinal (GI, 29%), hematologic (18%), lung (13%), gynecological and breast (8% each), among others.

Results

The panel is highly accurate with a test sensitivity of 92%, and demonstrated high specificity and positive predictive values (95% and 96%, respectively). Sequencing testing was successful in two-thirds of patients, while the remaining third failed due to unsuccessful quality-control filtering. Most detected variants were observed in the TP53 (28%), KRAS (16%), APC (10%) and PIK3CA (8%) genes. Overall, 372 variants were identified, primarily distributed as missense (81%), stop gain (9%) and frameshift (7%) altered sequences and mostly reported as pathogenic (78%) and variants of uncertain significance (19%). Only 14% of patients received targeted treatment based on the variant determined by the panel. The variants most frequently observed in GI and lung tumors were: KRAS c.35G > A (p.G12D), c.35G > T (p.G12V) and c.34G > T (p.G12C).

Conclusions

Prior panel validation allowed its use in the laboratory daily practice by providing several relevant and potentially targetable variants across multiple tumors. However, this study is limited by high sample inadequacy rate, raising doubts as to continuity in the clinical setting.

A comprehensive algorithm to distinguish between MPLC and IPM in multiple lung tumors patients

Background

Diagnosis of multiple lung nodules has become convenient and frequent due to the improvement of computed tomography (CT) scans. However, to distinguish intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) from multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) remains challenging. Herein, for the accurate optimization of therapeutic options, we propose a comprehensive algorithm for multiple lung carcinomas based on a multidisciplinary approach, and investigate the prognosis of patients who underwent surgical resection.

Methods

Patients with multiple lung carcinomas who were treated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April, 2009 to December, 2017, were retrospectively identified. A comprehensive algorithm combining histologic assessment, molecular analysis, and imaging information was used to classify nodules as IPM or MPLC. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and the relevant factors were evaluated using the log-rank test or Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The study included 576 patients with 1,295 lung tumors in total. Significant differences were observed between the clinical features of 171 patients with IPM and 405 patients with MPLC. The final classification consistency was 0.65 and 0.72 compared with the criteria of Martini and Melamed (MM) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), respectively. Patients with independent primary tumors had better overall survival (OS) than patients with intra-pulmonary metastasis (HR =3.99, 95% CI: 2.86–5.57; P<0.001). Nodal involvement and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

The comprehensive algorithm was a relevant tool for classifying multifocal lung tumors as MPLC or IPM, and could help doctors with precise decision-making in routine clinical practice. Patients with multiple lesions without lymph node metastasis or without radiotherapy tended to have a better prognosis.

Genetic features and application value of next generation sequencing in the diagnosis of synchronous multifocal lung adenocarcinoma

The present study aimed to elucidate the genetic features of multiple lung cancer (MLC) and identify effective molecular markers for diagnosis using next generation sequencing (NGS). The present data may also inform patient treatment and prognosis. A total of 35 lesions were obtained from 17 patients with MLC. Based on lesion histology and NGS, 13 cases of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) were identified and 4 cases were classified as intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM). All 4 patients with IPM exhibited an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and synchronous mutation of at least one tumor suppressor gene. The frequency and percentage of EGFR mutations, accompanied with tumor suppressor genes, were significantly higher in patients with IPM compared with MPLC. Furthermore, a high EGFR-heterogeneity score and male sex were risk factors of IPM occurrence. There were significant differences in mean EGFR mutation abundance alone, mutations of tumor suppressor genes and mutations of EGFR combined with tumor suppressor genes between patients with adenocarcinoma (ADC) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). In conclusion, histological characteristics combined with genetic alterations may be an effective method for the diagnosis of MPLC and IPM, and NGS may serve as a useful diagnostic tool. MLC exhibited unique molecular characteristics, including higher rates of EGFR mutations, EGFR driver mutations accompanied with tumor suppressor gene mutations and the absence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations, which may help distinguish between patients with MPLC or IPM. The present study hypothesized that the mean frequency of EGFR mutations, mutations of tumor suppressor genes and mutations of both EGFR and tumor suppressor genes may serve an important role in the development of AIS to ADC. The results of the present study highlight the potential underlying mechanisms of lung ADC development, which may assist with future elucidation of effective treatments to prevent the progression of lung cancer.

Classifying multiple lung cancers using morphological features: a meta-analysis

Multiple lung cancers may be intrapulmonary metastases or multiple primaries. Management and prognosis of both entities are different and make the pathologist's role challenging. In fact, distinguishing both entities may be difficult especially when the tumors present the same microscopic subtype. The microscopic diagnoses of these tumors have been improved based on the 2015 WHO classification. The aim of the authors was to assess the diagnostic value of morphologic features in comparison to the gold standard test represented by molecular testing in the distinction between intrapulmonary metastases and multiple lung primaries. To retrieve all eligible articles, PubMed and Embase databases and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched from 1999 to 2020 with limitation to French andEnglish language. The Meta-Disc software 5.1.32 was used to conduct this meta-analysis. The pSEN, pSPE, NLR, PLR, and DOR with the 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The area under the SROC was calculated based on the SEN and SPE of each study. Q test and I² statistics were carried out to explore the heterogeneity among studies. P value <.1 for q test or I² value >50% represented substantial between-study heterogeneity. Meta-regressions were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity if necessary. Twelve eligible articles with 309 patients were included. pSEN was estimated to 65% with I-square estimated to 53%. pSPE reached 49% with I-square estimated to 56%. PLR was estimated to 1.23 with I-square estimated to 33%. NLR was estimated to 0.65 with I-square estimated to 23.1%. dOR was estimated to 2.13 [1.07-4.25] with I-square estimated to 26.5%. AUC was estimated to 0.63. The meta-regression analysis showed non-significant effect of the WHO classification, next-generation sequencing, or nucleotide-specific sequencing with p reaching respectively 0.38, 0.06, and 0.36. These results highlight that morphologic features may be useful in the diagnosis of multiple lung cancers especially when dealing with surgical specimen. The mild heterogeneity observed in this meta-analysis may be due to other covariates that were not described in the different articles including the sample nature.

Non-fusion mutations in endometrial stromal sarcomas: what is the potential impact on tumourigenesis through cell cycle dysregulation?

Targeted next-generation sequencing using the 50-gene Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 identified two significant point mutations in endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS). Case 1 is a uterine mass from a quadragenarian woman with a karyotype lacking any known ESS rearrangements but demonstrated to have a CTNNB1-activating mutation (c.133T>C, p.[Ser45Pro]). Analysis of a uterine mass from case 2, a sexagenarian woman, revealed biallelic CDKN2A-inactivating mutations (c.172C>T, p.[Arg58Ter] and a deletion). Break-apart studies to identify YWHAE, JAZF1 and PHF1 rearrangements were negative in both tumours. We propose a model in which these point mutations may affect cell proliferation, converging at Wnt signalling and G1-S checkpoint control, that independently or in concert with a rare gene fusion result in ESS tumour development or progression.

Molecular profiling of key driver genes improves staging accuracy in multifocal non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Multifocal non-small cell lung cancer has historically been separated into synchronous primary lung cancers or intrapulmonary metastases with the use of histopathology. We hypothesize that using targeted next-generation sequencing of key driver mutations in multifocal non-small cell lung cancer will improve our ability to differentiate intrapulmonary metastases from synchronous primary lung cancers.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer between 2013 and 2018 with multifocal tumors. Archived specimens were reviewed with a 4-gene next-generation sequencing panel identifying mutations of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS. Synchronous primary lung cancers were classified as lesions with different histopathologic subtypes or driver mutations. Tests of hypotheses were performed with the Fisher exact test. Calculations were performed in Stata (v13.0; StataCorp LLC, College Station, Tex).

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients had non-small cell lung cancer tumor specimens (n = 41) available from 2 or more sites. The pathologic diagnosis was predominantly adenocarcinoma (39/41 specimens). We detected a driver mutation in 68.3% (28/41) of all tumors. The most common mutations observed were in KRAS (n = 17/41) and EGFR (n = 7/41). Eleven patients had synchronous primary lung cancers, and 4 patients had intrapulmonary metastases based on combined histopathologic and molecular profiling results. Three lacked driver mutations in either lesion. Eight synchronous primary lung cancers (8/18, 44%) were downstaged when compared with their original diagnosis (P = .08). Of these, 4 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy unnecessarily in hindsight.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular non-small cell lung cancer profiling using a 4-gene next-generation sequencing panel allows for better distinction between synchronous primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastases than histopathology alone. Routine use of next-generation sequencing for multifocal lesions prevents unnecessary adjuvant treatment for patients with histologically similar synchronous primary lung cancers.

Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing Unambiguously Distinguishes Separate Primary Lung Carcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases: Comparison with Standard Histopathologic Approach

PURPOSE

In patients with >1 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is a common diagnostic dilemma with critical staging implications. Here, we compared the performance of comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) with standard histopathologic approaches for distinguishing NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We queried 4,119 NSCLCs analyzed by 341-468 gene MSK-IMPACT NGS assay for patients with >1 surgically resected tumor profiled by NGS. Tumor relatedness predicted by prospective histopathologic assessment was contrasted with comparative genomic profiling by subsequent NGS.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with NGS performed on >1 NSCLCs were identified, yielding 76 tumor pairs. NGS classified tumor pairs into 51 definite SPLCs (median, 14; up to 72 unique somatic mutations per pair), and 25 IPMs (24 definite, one high probability; median, 5; up to 16 shared somatic mutations per pair). Prospective histologic prediction was discordant with NGS in 17 cases (22%), particularly in the prediction of IPMs (44% discordant). Retrospective review highlighted several histologic challenges, including morphologic progression in some IPMs. We subsampled MSK-IMPACT data to model the performance of less comprehensive assays, and identified several clinicopathologic differences between NGS-defined tumor pairs, including increased risk of subsequent recurrence for IPMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive NGS allows unambiguous delineation of clonal relationship among NSCLCs. In comparison, standard histopathologic approach is adequate in most cases, but has notable limitations in the recognition of IPMs. Our results support the adoption of broad panel NGS to supplement histology for robust discrimination of NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

Clinical Validation of Discordant Trunk Driver Mutations in Paired Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer Specimens

OBJECTIVES

To propose an operating procedure for validation of discordant trunk driver mutations.

METHODS

Concordance of trunk drivers was examined by next-generation sequencing in 15 patients with two to three metastatic lung cancers and 32 paired primary and metastatic lung cancers.

RESULTS

Tissue identity was confirmed by genotyping 17 single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the panel. All except three pairs showed concordant trunk drivers. Quality assessment conducted in three primary and metastatic pairs with discordant trunk drivers indicates metastasis from a synchronous or remote lung primary in two patients. Review of literature revealed high discordant rates of EGFR and KRAS mutations, especially when Sanger sequencing was applied to examine primary and lymph node metastatic tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Trunk driver mutations are highly concordant in primary and metastatic tumors. Discordance of trunk drivers, once confirmed, may suggest a second primary cancer. Guidelines are recommended to establish standard operating procedures for validation of discordant trunk drivers.

Gallbladder cancer harboring ERBB2 mutation on the primary and metastatic site: A case report

BACKGROUND

Bile duct cancer constitutes gallbladder cancer (GBC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICA), and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECA). These three entities show morphological and immunohistochemical resemblance so that it is difficult to differentiate between primary ICA and liver metastasis of GBC, which sometimes becomes a point of discussion in clinical practice. Although these cancers demonstrate significant differences in their mutational landscape, several reports demonstrated shared genomic alteration in paired primary and metastatic site aids in distinguishing metastatic recurrence from second primary cancers.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a 73-year-old female patient who underwent curative resection for GBC harboring epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) activating mutation on next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genomic testing. One year later, a hepatic lesion was observed on follow-up imaging and she underwent surgical resection for a pathological diagnosis. The histological findings of the hepatic lesion were similar to those of the primary lesion. Additionally, using NGS panel testing, the hepatic lesion was found to have ERBB2 activating mutation, which is the identical mutation detected in the sequencing result of the primary site. ERBB2 activating mutation occurs more frequently in GBC than ICA and ECA. Therefore, in the present case, we think this molecular finding potentiated the diagnosis of the liver mass toward a metastatic recurrence. Additionally, this patient underwent HER2-targeted treatment with lapatinib in combination with capecitabin and obtained clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrated NGS panel usefulness in distinguishing GBC recurrence from second primary cancer and HER2-targeted agent efficacy on ERBB2 mutated GBC.

Multiple primary lung cancer: a rising challenge

With the use of high-resolution chest imaging system and lung cancer screening program, patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are becoming a growing population in clinical practice worldwide. The diagnostic criteria for MPLCs has been established and modified by three major lung cancer research institutes. However, due to the fact that the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and a recurrence, metastatic, or satellite lesion arising from the original lesion remains ambiguous and confusing, there is still insufficient evidence to support a uniform guideline. Newly developed molecular and genomic methods have the potential to better define the relationship among multiple lesions and bring the possibility of targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the first choice for the treatment of MPLCs and detailed strategy should be carefully planned taking characteristics of the tumor and status of patients into consideration. For those who are intolerant to surgery, a new technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now an optional therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, multiple GGOs are unique MPLCs that need special attentions in the clinical practice.

Subjecting appropriate lung adenocarcinoma samples to next-generation sequencing-based molecular testing: challenges and possible solutions

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently been rapidly adopted in the molecular diagnosis of cancer, but it still faces some obstacles. In this study, 665 lung adenocarcinoma samples (558 TKI-naive and 107 TKI-relapsed samples) were interrogated using NGS, and the challenges and possible solutions of subjecting appropriate tissue samples to NGS testing were explored. The results showed that lower frequencies of HER2/BRAF/PIK3CA and acquired EGFR T790M mutations were observed in biopsy samples with <20% tumor cellularity than in those with ≥20%, but there were no significant differences in the frequencies of EGFR or KRAS mutations. Moreover, tumor heterogeneity was assessed by heterogeneity score (HS), which was calculated through multiplying by 2 the mutant allele frequency (MAF) of tumor cells. In TKI-naive samples, intratumor heterogeneity could occur in EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutant tumors, but the degree was variable. Higher EGFR, but lower BRAF and PIK3CA HS values were observed compared with KRAS HS. In TKI-relapsed samples, analysis of concomitant sensitizing EGFR and T790M MAFs showed that intratumor heterogeneity was common in acquired EGFR T790M mutant tumors. The mutational status between primary and metastatic tumors was usually concordant, but KRAS, HER2, and PIK3CA HS were significantly higher in metastatic tumors than in primary tumors. Additionally, the discordance rate of mutational status in multifocal lung adenocarcinomas diagnosed as equivocal or multiple primary tumors was high. Together, our findings demonstrate that a comprehensive quality assessment is necessary during tissue process to mitigate the challenges of poor tumor cellularity, tumor heterogeneity, and multifocal clonally independent tumors.