Rapid EGFR Mutation Detection Using the Idylla Platform: Single-Institution Experience of 1200 Cases Analyzed by an In-House Developed Pipeline and Comparison with Concurrent Next-Generation Sequencing Results

Microfluidics-based EGFR mutation detection and its implication in the resource-limited clinical setting

Management of lung cancer today obligates a mutational analysis of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene particularly when Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) therapy is being considered as part of prognostic stratification. This study evaluates the performance of automated microfluidics-based EGFR mutation detection and its significance in clinical diagnostic settings. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from NSCLC patients (n = 174) were included in a two-phase study. Phase I: Validation of the platform by comparing the results with conventional real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. Phase II: EGFR mutation detection on microfluidics-based platform as part of routine diagnostics workup. The microfluidics-based platform demonstrates 96.5% and 89.2% concordance with conventional real-time PCR and NGS, respectively. The system efficiently detects mutations across the EGFR gene with 88.23% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Out of 144 samples analysed in phase II, the platform generated valid results in 94% with mutation detected in 41% of samples. This microfluidics-based platform can detect as low as 5% mutant allele fractions from the FFPE samples. Therefore the microfluidics-based platform is a rapid, complete walkaway, with minimum tissue requirement (two sections of 5 μ thickness) and technical skill requirement. The method can detect clinically actionable EGFR mutations efficiently and can be considered a reliable diagnostic platform in resource-limited settings. From receiving samples to reporting the results this platform provides accurate data without much manual intervention. The study helped to devise an algorithm that emphasizes effective screening of the NSCLC cases for EGFR mutations with varying tumour content. Thus it helps in triaging the cases judiciously before proceeding with multigene testing.

The association of EGFR amplification with aberrant exon 20 insertion report using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2

Determining the exact type of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutation in lung cancer has become important. We found that not all ex20ins mutations reported by cobas EGFR test v2 could be validated by Sanger sequencing even using surgical specimens with high tumor contents. This study aimed to validate the ex20ins results reported by the cobas test and to determine whether there were clinicopathological factors associated with aberrant cobas ex20ins report. In total, 123 cobas-reported cases with ex20ins were retrospectively collected and validated by Sanger sequencing and Idylla assay. Clinicopathological features between ex20ins cobas+/Sanger+ group (n = 71) and cobas+/Sanger- group (n = 52) were compared. The Idylla assay detected ex20ins in 82.6% of cobas+/Sanger+ cases but only in 4.9% of cobas+/Sanger- cases. The cobas+/Sanger- group was significantly associated with higher tumor contents, poorly differentiated patterns, tumor necrosis, and a lower internal control cycle threshold value reported by the Idylla which suggesting the presence of increased EGFR gene copy numbers. EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the majority of cobas+/Sanger- group had EGFR high copy number gain (16%) or amplification (76%) according to the Colorado criteria. Among cases reported to have concomitant classic EGFR and ex20ins mutations by the cobas, the classic EGFR mutations were all detected by Sanger sequencing and Idylla, while the ex20ins mutations were undetected by Sanger sequencing (0%) or rarely reported by Idylla assay (3%). FISH revealed high EGFR copy number gain (17.9%) and amplification (79.5%) in cases reported having concomitant classic EGFR and ex20ins mutations by the cobas. This study demonstrated an unusually high frequency of EGFR amplification in cases with aberrant cobas ex20ins report which could not be validated by Sanger sequencing or Idylla assay. Ex20ins reported by the cobas test should be validated using other methods especially those reported having concomitant ex20ins and classic EGFR mutations.

Use of cytology fluid samples for predictive biomarker testing in lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To provide a method of directly using cytology fluid samples for predictive biomarker testing in lung cancer patients and to determine the efficacy of a variety of fluid sample types.

METHOD

A review of our in-house data from a range of cytology samples including endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) fine-needle aspirate (FNA) needle washings (NW) and serous effusions tested on the Biocartis Idylla platform. All fluid samples were originally tested using Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Using our method for fluid samples all of our cytology samples tested for epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) yielded valid results on this platform and all variant cases identified. The data showed serous fluids provided the best quality DNA, and variant genotype reports were obtained within 150 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Cytology fluid samples can be used for predictive biomarker testing for lung cancer patients to provide in-house results with all fluids providing good-quality DNA.

Rapid and reliable testing for clinically actionable EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer using the IdyllaTM platform: a real-world two-center experience in Greece

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) molecular epidemiology in Greece. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the recommended method for EGFR genotyping in NSCLC. The Idylla Biocartis platform is a fully automated system for actionable EGFR mutation detection.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We describe the prevalence of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients in two high-volume clinical centers in Greece and compare key methods used for their determination. Eight hundred and fifty-seven FFPE samples from NSCLC patients were tested for EGFR mutations at University of Crete (UoC; n = 324) and at Evangelismos Hospital, Athens (Evangelismos; n = 503).

RESULTS

The prevalence of EGFR mutations was 11.1% in the whole cohort (11.5% in non-squamous). The detection rate was 11.0% by NGS, 9.8% by Sanger and 11.3% by Idylla for the whole cohort (12.0% in non-squamous). The agreement between Idylla and Sanger was 93.2%. A targetable EGFR mutation was detected in 10.0% using tissue NGS alone, and in 16.0% using concurrent Idylla ctEGFR testing.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of EGFR mutations was as expected for a Caucasian population. The Idylla EGFR test performance is comparable to reference methods and with a shorter TAT. Adding a concurrent plasma Idylla test to tissue NGS testing increases the detection rate of EGFR mutations in NSCLC.

Comparison and Validation of Rapid Molecular Testing Methods for Theranostic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Alterations in Lung Cancer: Idylla versus Digital Droplet PCR

Targeting EGFR alterations, particularly the L858R (Exon 21) mutation and Exon 19 deletion (del19), has significantly improved the survival of lung cancer patients. From now on, the issue is to shorten the time to treatment. Here, we challenge two well-known rapid strategies for EGFR testing: the cartridge-based platform Idylla™ (Biocartis) and a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) approach (ID_Solution). To thoroughly investigate each testing performance, we selected a highly comprehensive cohort of 39 unique del19 (in comparison, the cbioportal contains 40 unique del19), and 9 samples bearing unique polymorphisms in exon 19. Additional L858R (N = 24), L861Q (N = 1), del19 (N = 63), and WT samples (N = 34) were used to determine clear technical and biological cutoffs. A total of 122 DNA samples extracted from formaldehyde-fixed samples was used as input. No false positive results were reported for either of the technologies, as long as careful droplet selection (ddPCR) was ensured for two polymorphisms. ddPCR demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting unique del19 (92.3%, 36/39) compared to Idylla (67.7%, 21/31). However, considering the prevalence of del19 and L858R in the lung cancer population, the adjusted theranostic values were similar (96.51% and 95.26%, respectively). ddPCR performs better for small specimens and low tumoral content, but in other situations, Idylla is an alternative (especially if a molecular platform is absent).

Idylla EGFR assay on extracted DNA: advantages, limits and place in molecular screening according to the latest guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

AIMS

Idylla epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a fast and fully automated mutation assay that is easy to implement. However, under the Biocartis-recommended technical conditions, tissue sections are directly introduced into the cartridge, at the risk of exhausting the tumour sample. In this study, we evaluate the performance of Idylla EGFR on extracted DNA and discuss its place within the global non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) screening strategy.

METHODS

577 comparative tests between Idylla EGFR on extracted DNA and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed across two centres.

RESULTS

Preanalytical thresholds were established (20% tumour cell content, 50 ng DNA input) and challenged prospectively in routine practice. 16.8% of samples referred for screening were considered non eligible for Idylla EGFR testing. Due to discordant by design cases, Idylla EGFR sensitivity was 86.9% for currently actionable EGFR mutations. Idylla EGFR specificity was 100% in first-line screening. NGS was always feasible on the same DNA.

CONCLUSION

Idylla EGFR on extracted DNA is feasible and enables tumour material to be saved compared with tissue section use. It is not necessary to replace the analytical thresholds of the Biocartis algorithm. Due to both the limits of the mutational repertoire and the high increase of targetable genes in NSCLC, the use of Idylla EGFR should be restricted to clinical emergency situations accompanied by NGS.

Performance of Ultra-Rapid Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Potential at Clinical Molecular Screening

BACKGROUND

The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test is an ultra-rapid single-gene test that detects epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Here, we compared the performance of the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test with the Cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2.

METHODS

Surgically resected NSCLC specimens obtained at two Japanese institutions (N = 170) were examined. The Idylla EGFR Mutation Test and the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 were performed independently and the results were compared. For discordant cases, the Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer Research Panel V2 was performed.

RESULTS

After the exclusion of five inadequate/invalid samples, 165 cases were evaluated. EGFR mutation analysis revealed 52 were positive and 107 were negative for EGFR mutation in both assays (overall concordance rate: 96.4%). Analyses of the six discordant cases revealed that the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test was correct in four and the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 was correct in two. In a trial calculation, the combination of the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test followed by a multi-gene panel test will reduce molecular screening expenses if applied to a cohort with EGFR mutation frequency >17.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the accuracy and potential clinical utility of the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test as a molecular screening platform in terms of turnaround time and molecular testing cost if applied to a cohort with a high EGFR mutation incidence (>17.9%).

Updates in pathology and molecular diagnostics to inform the evolving landscape of thoracic surgery and oncology

The pathologic assessment of lung cancers provides essential guidance to the surgeon and oncologist who are considering the best treatment strategies for patients with both early and advanced-stage disease. The management of patients with lung cancer is predicated first and foremost on access to an accurate diagnosis, even when the sample size is limited, as is often the case with use of modern, minimally invasive sampling techniques. Once the diagnosis and disease stage are established, predictive biomarker testing may be essential, particularly for those patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) being considered for immunotherapy or genomic biomarker-driven targeted therapy. This review will discuss the best practices for the diagnosis of NSCLC using morphology and immunohistochemistry, thus providing the surgeon with needed information to understand and critically evaluate pathology reports. Controversial and evolving topics including tumor spread through airspaces, evaluation of multiple tumors, and staging based on invasive tumor size will be addressed. Clinical genomic profiling in NSCLC is driven by published guidelines and reflects evidence based on clinical trials and regulatory approvals. In this fast-moving space, surgeons should be aware of the critical immunohistochemical and genomic biomarkers that drive systemic therapy decisions and anticipate when such testing will be required, both to ensure adequate sampling and to advise the pathologist when tumor material will be required for biomarker analysis. The basic approaches to and sample requirements for molecular biomarker testing will be addressed. As biomarker testing moves exclusively from advanced-stage patients into earlier stage disease, the surgeon should be aware of the relevant markers and work with the pathologist and oncologist to ensure that this information is available to facilitate timely access to therapies not just in the advanced setting, but in consideration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant care.

FACILITATE: A real-world, multicenter, prospective study investigating the utility of a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR assay versus local reference methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor variants in NSCLC

Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated EGFR variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [n = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (n = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (n = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.

Toward a More Just System of Care in Molecular Pathology

Policy Points American health care policy must be critically assessed to establish the role it plays in sustaining and alleviating the health disparities that currently exist in molecular genetic testing. It is critical to understand the economic and sociocultural influences that drive patients to undergo or forgo molecular testing, especially in marginalized patient populations. A multipronged solution with actions necessary from multiple stakeholders is required to reduce the cost of health care, rebalance regional disparities, encourage physician engagement, reduce data bias, and earn patients' trust.

CONTEXT

The health status of a population is greatly influenced by both biological processes and external factors. For years, minority and low socioeconomic patient populations have faced worse outcomes and poorer health in the United States. Experts have worked extensively to understand the issues and find solutions to alleviate this disproportionate burden of disease. As a result, there have been some improvements and successes, but wide gaps still exist. Diagnostic molecular genetic testing and so-called personalized medicine are just now being integrated into the current American health care system. The way in which these tests are integrated can either exacerbate or reduce health disparities.

METHODS

We provide case scenarios-loosely based on real-life patients-so that nonexperts can see the impacts of complex policy decisions and unintentional biases in technology without needing to understand all the intricacies. We use data to explain these findings from an extensive literature search examining both peer-reviewed and gray literature.

FINDINGS

Access to diagnostic molecular genetic testing is not equitable or sufficient, owing to at least five major factors: (1) cost to the patient, (2) location, (3) lack of provider buy-in, (4) data-set bias, and (5) lack of public trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular genetic pathology can be made more equitable with the concerted efforts of multiple stakeholders. Confronting the five major factors identified here may help us usher in a new era of precision medicine without its discriminatory counterpart.

Molecular Profiling in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Towards a Switch to Next-Generation Sequencing Reflex Testing

Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer is a constantly evolving field thanks to major advances in precision oncology. The wide range of actionable molecular alterations in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) and the multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance to treatment resulted in the need for repeated testing to establish an accurate molecular diagnosis, as well as to track disease evolution over time. While assessing the increasing complexity of the molecular composition of tumors at baseline, as well as over time, has become increasingly challenging, the emergence and implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has extensively facilitated molecular profiling in NS-NSCLC. In this review, we discuss recent developments in the molecular profiling of NS-NSCLC and how NGS addresses current needs, as well as how it can be implemented to address future challenges in the management of NS-NSCLC.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy for a Comprehensive Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Primary Lung Cancer: Safety, Efficacy, and Predictors of Outcome

Introduction

To evaluate factors associated with successful comprehensive genomic sequencing of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsies in patients with lung cancer using a broad hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing assay (CHCA).

Methods

We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of image-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsies from January 2018 to December 2019. Samples with confirmed diagnosis of primary lung cancer and for which CHCA had been attempted were identified. Pathologic, clinical data and results of the CHCA were reviewed. Covariates associated with CHCA success were tested for using Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon ranked sum test. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with likelihood of CHCA success.

Results

CHCA was requested for 479 samples and was successful for 433 (91%), with a median coverage depth of 659X. Factors independently associated with lower likelihood of CHCA success included small tumor size (OR = 0.26 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.62, p = 0.002]), intraoperative inadequacy on cytologic assessment (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.06-0.63, p = 0.005]), small caliber needles (≥20-gauge) (OR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.10-0.45, p < 0.001]), and presence of lung parenchymal abnormalities (OR = 0.12 [95% CI: 0.05-0.25, p < 0.001]). Pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion occurred in 6% of the procedures. No grade IV complications or procedure-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Percutaneous image-guided transthoracic needle biopsy is safe and has 91% success rate for CHCA in primary lung cancer. Intraoperative inadequacy, small caliber needle, presence of parenchymal abnormalities, and small tumor size (≤1 cm) are independently associated with likelihood of failure.

Clinical Utility and Performance of an Ultrarapid Multiplex RNA-Based Assay for Detection of ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 Rearrangements and MET Exon 14 Skipping Alterations

Several kinase fusions are established targetable drivers in lung cancers. However, rapid and comprehensive detection remains challenging because of diverse partner genes and breakpoints. We assess the clinical utility and performance of a rapid microfluidic multiplex real-time PCR-based assay for simultaneous query of fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3, as well as MET exon 14 skipping, using a 3-hour automated process. Dual analytic strategies were utilized: fusion-specific amplification and 3' to 5' expression imbalance. One-hundred and forty-three independent, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples (112 surgical specimens, 31 cytologic cell blocks) were analyzed: 133 with known kinase gene alterations and 10 negative samples based on clinically validated next-generation sequencing. Testing was successful in 142 (99%) cases. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 97% (28/29), 100% (31/31), 92% (22/24), 81% (22/27), and 100% (20/20) for ALK, RET, ROS1, and NTRK1/2/3 rearrangements and MET exon 14 skipping alterations, respectively, with 100% specificity for all. Concordant results were achieved in specimens aged up to 5 years, with >10% tumor, and inputs of at least 9 mm² (surgical specimens) and 9000 cells (cytologic cell blocks). The assay enables rapid screening for clinically actionable kinase alterations with quicker turnaround and lower tissue requirements compared with immunohistochemistry and molecular methods, while also circumventing the infrastructure dependencies associated with next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Utility of Select Gene Mutation Detection in Tumors by the Idylla Rapid Multiplex PCR Platform in Comparison to Next-Generation Sequencing

Testing of tumors by next generation sequencing (NGS) is impacted by relatively long turnaround times and a need for highly trained personnel. Recently, Idylla oncology assays were introduced to test for BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, and NRAS common hotspot mutations that do not require specialized trained personnel. Moreover, the interpretation of results is fully automated, with rapid turnaround time. Though Idylla testing and NGS have been shown to have high concordance in identifying EGFR, BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS hotspot mutations, there is limited experience on optimal ways the Idylla system can be used in routine practice. We retrospectively evaluated all cases with EGFR, BRAF, KRAS, or NRAS mutations identified in clinical specimens sequenced on two different NGS panels at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) molecular diagnostics laboratory between July 2020 and July 2021 and assessed if these mutations would be detected by the Idylla cartridges if used. We found that the Idylla system could accurately identify Tier 1 or 2 actionable genomic alterations in select associated disease pathologies if used. Yet, in a minority of cases, we would have been unable to detect NGS-identified pathogenic mutations due to their absence on the Idylla panels. We derived algorithmic practice guidelines for the use of the Idylla cartridges. Overall, Idylla molecular testing could be implemented either as a first-line standalone diagnostic tool in select indications or for orthogonal confirmation of uncertain results.

Contribution of the IdyllaTM System to Improving the Therapeutic Care of Patients with NSCLC through Early Screening of EGFR Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotyping, a critical examen for the treatment decisions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is commonly assayed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), but this global approach takes time. To determine whether rapid EGFR genotyping tests by the Idylla^TM system guides earlier therapy decisions, EGFR mutations were assayed by both the Idylla^TM system and NGS in 223 patients with NSCLC in a bicentric prospective study. Idylla^TM demonstrated agreement with the NGS method in 187/194 cases (96.4%) and recovered 20 of the 26 (77%) EGFR mutations detected using NGS. Regarding the seven missed EGFR mutations, five were not detected by the Idylla^TM system, one was assayed in a sample with insufficient tumoral cells, and the last was in a sample not validated by the Idylla^TM system (a bone metastasis). Idylla^TM did not detect any false positives. The average time between EGFR genotyping results from Idylla^TM and the NGS method was 9.2 ± 2.2 working days (wd) (12.6 ± 4.0 calendar days (cd)). Subsequently, based on the Idylla^TM method, the timeframe from tumor sampling to the initiation of EGFR-TKI was 7.7 ± 1.2 wd (11.4 ± 3.1 cd), while it was 20.3 ± 6.7 wd (27.2 ± 8.3 cd) with the NGS method (p < 0.001). We thus demonstrated here that the Idylla^TM system contributes to improving the therapeutic care of patients with NSCLC by the early screening of EGFR mutations.

Evaluation of the Idylla ctEGFR mutation assay to detect EGFR mutations in plasma from patients with non-small cell lung cancers

The assessment of EGFR mutations is recommended for the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presence of EGFR mutation is associated with response or resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). Liquid biopsy is nowadays widely used for the detection of resistance to EGFR-TKI. We evaluated here the performance of the Idylla ctEGFR mutation assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma from patients with NSCLC. Previously characterized plasma samples from 38 patients with NSCLC were analysed using 2 different analytical conditions (C1 and C2). The limit of detection (LOD) was evaluated using 2 mL of healthy donor plasma spiked with commercial DNA controls. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were 92.1%, 86.7% and 95.7% for C1 condition respectively and 94.7%, 86.7% and 100% for C2 condition respectively. The T790M secondary resistance mutation was detected in two samples out of 3. The Idylla system was able to detect the exon 19 deletion from 6 copies/mL and up to 91 copies/mL for the G719S mutation. These results support that the Idylla ctEGFR mutation assay is a rapid option for the detection of EGFR hotspots mutations in plasma samples, however a particular attention is needed for its interpretation.