Anti-interferon-beta neutralising activity is not entirely mediated by antibodies

MxA mRNA decrease preceding NAb detection in IFNβ-treated MS patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ) are at risk of a declining response to treatment because of the production of IFNβ-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). The expression of Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) mRNA is regarded as a marker of IFNβ bioactivity.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyze the kinetics of MxA mRNA expression during long-term IFNβ treatment and assess its relationship to NAb production.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, open-label, non-randomized study was designed in multiple sclerosis patients starting IFNβ treatment. NAbs and MxA mRNA were monitored every six months.

RESULTS

119 patients were consecutively enrolled and 107 were included in the final analysis. Both the presence of NAbs and a decrease in MxA mRNA below the cut off were revealed in 15 patients, however, in six patients (40%) positivity for NAbs was preceded by the decrease in MxA mRNA. In addition, a further six patients showing a decline in MxA mRNA did not have detectable NAbs.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that quantification of MxA mRNA is a more sensitive identifier of loss of IFNβ efficacy than the NAb positivity.

Myxovirus Resistance Protein A mRNA Expression Kinetics in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with IFNβ

Introduction

Interferon-β (IFNß) is the first-line treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a marker of IFNß bioactivity, which may be reduced by neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFNß. The aim of the study was to analyze the kinetics of MxA mRNA expression during long-term IFNβ treatment and assess its predictive value.

Methods

A prospective, observational, open-label, non-randomized study was designed in multiple sclerosis patients starting IFNß treatment. MxA mRNA was assessed prior to initiation of IFNß therapy and every three months subsequently. NAbs were assessed every six months. Assessment of relapses was scheduled every three months during 24 months of follow up. The disease activity was correlated to the pretreatment baseline MxA mRNA value. In NAb negative patients, clinical status was correlated to MxA mRNA values.

Results

119 patients were consecutively enrolled and 107 were included in the final analysis. There was no correlation of MxA mRNA expression levels between baseline and month three. Using survival analysis, none of the selected baseline MxA mRNA cut off points allowed prediction of time to first relapse on the treatment. In NAb negative patients, mean MxA mRNA levels did not significantly differ in patients irrespective of relapse status.

Conclusion

Baseline MxA mRNA does not predict the response to IFNß treatment or the clinical status of the disease and the level of MxA mRNA does not correlate with disease activity in NAb negative patients.

Higher expression of IL-12Rβ2 is associated with lower risk of relapse in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients on interferon-β1b therapy during 3-year follow-up

Cytokines produced by helper T (Th)1 cells, Th17 and regulatory T cells (Treg) are involved in multiple sclerosis (MS) immunopathogenesis. Interferon (IFN)-β alters the numerous genes' expression, but how this alteration affects the treatment response is still elusive. We assessed relative gene expression of nineteen Th1/Th17/Treg-associated mediators in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and plasma levels of GM-CSF, IL-17A and IL-17F, in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients before IFN-β1b treatment initiation and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of therapy. All mRNA levels changed significantly during the IFN-β1b therapy. Higher IL-12Rβ2 mRNA levels were associated with lower risk of relapse. Despite recent reports regarding role of GM-CSF in MS, our study failed to demonstrate its significance as therapy response biomarker, both on the mRNA and protein level.

Development of interferon beta-neutralising antibodies in multiple sclerosis--a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Interferon beta (IFN-β) is the drug of choice for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis and is known to reduce the frequency and severity of relapses. This systematic review determines the occurrence of neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against different formulations of IFN-β: IFN-β-1a Avonex™, IFN-β-1a Rebif™ and IFN-β-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™.

METHODS

The databases used in the review included MEDLINE Ovid (from 1950 to March 2015), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to March 2015), CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 4) and ClinicalTrials.gov (from 1997 to March 2015). All studies that compared the efficacy of the different formulations of IFN-β in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis including IFN-β-1a Avonex™, IFN-β-1a Rebif™, IFN-β-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™ and IFN-β-1b Extavia™ were included.

RESULTS

Assessment of randomised controlled trials demonstrated that Avonex™ was 76% less likely than Rebif™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Avonex™ was 88% less likely than Betaferon/Betaseron™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Similar findings were also observed in the non-randomised controlled studies, with Avonex™ having the lowest risk. The formation of NAbs was dose dependent: Avonex™ at 30 μg was 64% less risky than Avonex™ at 60 μg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that 2.0-18.9% of patients developed NAbs to Avonex™, 16.5-35.4% of patients developed NAbs to Rebif™ and 27.3-53.3% of patients developed NAbs to Betaferon/Betaseron™.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Abolished Interferon-beta Bioavailability

BACKGROUND

Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to interferon-beta (IFN-β) are associated with reduced bioactivity and efficacy of IFN-β in multiple sclerosis (MS). The myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) gene expression is one of the most appropriate markers of biological activity of exogenous IFN-β. We hypothesized that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can restore the ability of IFN-β to induce the MxA mRNA expression and that maintenance plasmapheresis can sustain the bioavailability of IFN-β.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible patients underwent 4 primary separate plasma exchange sessions. After the induction TPE sessions, they were transferred to maintenance plasmapheresis. Bioactivity of IFN-β was expressed as in vivo MxA mRNA induction in whole blood using RT-qPCR.

RESULTS

Six patients with low IFN-β bioavailability detected by the MxA mRNA response were included. Four patients became biological responders after induction plasmapheresis. In 2 patients an increase of MxA mRNA expression was found, but the values persisted below the cut-off and the patients remained as "poor biological responders". The effect of maintenance plasmapheresis was transient: MxA mRNA expression values reverted to the baseline levels after 1-2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic plasma exchange is able to restore the bioavailability of IFN-β in the majority of studied patients, but the effect of TPE on the IFN-β bioavailability was transient.

Evaluation of the impact of neutralizing antibodies on IFNβ response

IFNβ therapeutic action depends on a sequence of biological steps: i) the interaction between interferon beta (IFNβ) and its receptor (IFNAR) located at the cell surface of peripheral blood mononuclear cells; ii) activation of second messengers; iii) transcription of several genes containing specific ISRE regions (Interferon Stimulated Response Elements); and iv) synthesis of specific proteins. Although IFNβ therapy has improved treatment options of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the long-term efficacy of IFNβs can be compromised due to the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). High titer NAbs develop in about 15% of patients; they abolish IFNβ biological activity and consequently the therapeutic action of IFNβ. Different IFNβ preparations carry different risks of developing NAbs, ranging from 3 to 28%. The risk of inducing NAbs must be considered in the selection of treatment. Guidelines for NAbs testing and the therapeutic decision in case of NAbs positivity have been established. NAbs positivity predicts MRI and clinical activity. Precocious identification of Nabs-positive patients and switch to alternative treatments can improve the percentage of responders and allow a better allocation of relevant economical resources.

MxA mRNA quantification and disability progression in interferon beta-treated multiple sclerosis patients

Even though anti-interferon beta (IFNβ) antibodies are the main determinants of IFNβ bioactivity loss and Myxovirus-resistance protein A (MxA) is the most established marker of IFNβ biological activity in IFNβ-treated multiple sclerosis patients, their usefulness in the routine clinical practice is still debated. Therefore, 118 multiple sclerosis patients naïve for treatment were enrolled for a 3-year longitudinal observational study mimicking the conditions of a real-world setting. In order to evaluate the kinetics of bioactivity loss in blood samples obtained every 6 months after therapy initiation, MxA and interferon receptor isoform/subunit mRNA were quantified by real-time PCR, anti-IFNβ binding antibodies were detected by radioimmunoprecipitation, and neutralizing antibodies by cytopathic effect inhibition assay. Clinical measures of disease activity and disability progression were also obtained at all time points. We found that, at the individual-patient level, the response to IFNβ therapy was extremely heterogeneous, including patients with stable or transitory, early or late loss of IFNβ bioactivity, and patients with samples lacking MxA mRNA induction in spite of absence of antibodies. No interferon receptor isoform alterations that could explain these findings were found. At the group level, none of these biological features correlated with the measures of clinical disease activity or progression. However, when MxA mRNA was evaluated not at the single time point as a dichotomic marker (induced vs. non-induced), but as the mean of its values measured over the 6-to-24 month period, the increasing average MxA predicted a decreasing risk of short-term disability progression, independently from the presence of relapses. Therefore, a more bioactive treatment, even if unable to suppress relapses, reduces their severity by an amount that is proportional to MxA levels. Together with its feasibility in the routine laboratory setting, these data warrant the quantification of MxA mRNA as a primary tool for a routine monitoring of IFNβ therapy.

BAb and MxA as functional biomarkers in routine clinical laboratories for the determination of anti-IFN-beta antibodies and their bioactivity levels in multiple sclerosis patients

In MS patients under IFNβ treatment to seek alternative treatments timely is important that anti-IFNβ antibodies and/or in vivo biologic activity loss detection in these. The most common diagnostic markers used for this purpose are BAb, Nab, and MxA. In this article, we aimed to establish the availability and feasibility of the correlation between BAb and MxA gene expression (mRNA) levels using evaluation of responses to IFNβ treatment for MS patients with a routine laboratory follow-up strategy in a major Turkish MS center. Bab seropositivity was determined in blood samples of 218 MS patients treated with different IFNβ preparations and MxA mRNA levels were measured in 128 patients among the total population. BAb seropositivity ratios to im INF-β 1a, scINF-β 1a, and sc INF-β 1b were 21.4%, 28.6%, and 70.4%, respectively (total 40%), and total loss of bioactivity (MxA mRNA) were 9.3%, 9.5%, and 11.6%, respectively (total 10.2%). The correlation between high BAb titers and low MxA mRNA levels was highly significant (P = 0.00003). Our data indicate that there is a good correlation between especially high BAbs levels and diminished MxA mRNA levels.

Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-Beta

The development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a major problem in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFN-ß). Whereas binding antibodies (BAbs) can be demonstrated in the vast majority of patients, only a smaller proportion of patients develop NAbs. The principle in NAb in vitro assays is the utilization of cultured cell lines that are responsive to IFN-ß. The cytopathic effect (CPE) assay measures the capacity of NAbs to neutralize IFN- ß's protective effect on cells challenged with virus and the MxA induction assay measures the ability of NAbs to reduce the IFN-ß-induced expression of MxA, either at the mRNA or the protein level. A titer of >20 neutralizing units/ml traditionally defines NAb posi-tivity. NAbs in high titers completely abrogate the in vivo response to IFN-ß, whereas the effect of low and intermediate titers is unpredictable. As clinically important NAbs appear only after 9-18 months IFN- ß0 therapy, short-term studies of two years or less are unsuitable for evaluation of clinical NAb effects. All long-term trials of three years or more concordantly show evidence of a detrimental effect of NAbs on relapses, disease activity on MRI, or on disease progression. Persistent high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. As low and medium titers are ambiguous treatment decisions in patients with low NAb titres should be guided by determination of in vivo mRNA MxA induction and clinical disease activity.

Incorporation of an interferon-β neutralizing antibody assay into routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Incorporation of routine clinical testing for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon (IFN)-β has remained problematic. With increasing treatment choice for patients, routine NAb testing should be incorporated to aid therapeutic decisions.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to improve interpretation of NAb results by combining the luciferase NAb assay (luciferase gene expression assay under control of interferon-stimulated response element) and in-vivo biomarker (myxovirus A protein, MxA) induction in patients with MS.

METHODS

Blood samples (serum and PAXGene(®) for RNA) were obtained pre-injection and 12 hours post-injection of IFN-β from 144 subjects. Sera were tested for NAbs using the luciferase assay. MxA expression was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

26% of samples were NAb positive (titre > 20 NU). There was no difference in NAb titres in the pre- or post-dose sera (p = 0.643). MxA expression was inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion in NAb positive samples. Mean MxA level post-IFN-β: NAb negative 2330 (95% CI 1940-2719), NAb 20-99 NU 1533 (95% CI 741-2324), NAb 100-600 NU 832 (186-1478) and NAb > 600 NU 101 (95% CI 0-224). NAb titre and MxA level correlated strongly: MxA pre- (Spearman r = -0.72, p < 0.0001), MxA post- (Spearman r = -0.79, p < 0.0001) and MxA induction (Spearman r = -0.67, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

A single, 12-hour post-injection sample should be used to test for NAbs using the luciferase assay and IFN-β bioactivity (MxA) in the clinical setting.

Role of differential expression of interferon receptor isoforms on the response of multiple sclerosis patients to therapy with interferon beta

The cytokine interferon (IFN)-β is successfully used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. However, some patients fail to respond to therapy, probably due to different biological patterns that are of importance in influencing clinical response. A common mechanism involved in the modulation of responsiveness to cytokine is represented by regulation of their receptor expression through autocrine-ligand-mediated loops. Mechanistically, IFN-β exerts its biological effects through interaction with the IFN-α/-β-receptor (IFNAR), which then activates several transcription factors. IFNAR is composed of 2 chains, IFNAR-1 and IFNAR-2, which associate with IFN-β to form a ternary complex. The major ligand-binding subunit is IFNAR-2 and it exists in 3 mRNA splice variants, resulting in 2 transmembrane (IFNAR-2b and IFNAR-2c) isoforms and a soluble (IFNAR-2a) one. On the contrary, from normal cells only one IFNAR-1 isoform, with transcriptional capacity, was identified. In the past decades, considerable information has accumulated pertaining to the downregulation of the IFNAR complex in IFN-treated patients, but only a few studies have investigated the molecular events involved in this phenomenon. The intent of the present review is to place this receptor downregulation in the context of IFN-β therapy and of its clinical and biological outcomes in IFN-β-treated patients.

One-year evaluation of factors affecting the biological activity of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis patients

MxA is an antiviral protein induced by type I interferons (IFN) and some viruses; MxA gene expression is an appropriate marker for measuring biologic activity of exogenous IFNβ, as its induction indicates IFNAR receptor stimulation. A recent study has shown that measurement of MxA mRNA, after 1 year of treatment, predicts clinical responsiveness to IFNβ therapy. Loss of IFNβ bioactivity is mostly due to anti-IFNβ antibodies (both neutralizing and binding), non-compliance and receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to evaluate all possible causes of loss of IFNβ bioactivity after 1 year in treated patients. One hundred sixty-seven multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were included. One year after beginning IFNβ therapy, each patient underwent a blood test; MxA gene expression was measured by real time PCR, antiviral CPE assay to detect neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), and capture-ELISA (cELISA) to measure binding antibodies (BAbs). For MxA an upper normal threshold of 87 (RE) was considered, 20 TRU/mL was the threshold for NAbs, and 1 U for BAbs positivity. Thirty-seven out of 167 patients (22%) were MxA-negative; of these, 22 were both BAbs and NAbs+, whereas 12 were BAbs+ but Nabs-, and three were both BAbs and NAbs-. The following conclusions were drawn from the study: (1) MxA mRNA should be measured after 1 year of IFNβ therapy; (2) after 1 year of IFNβ treatment, absence of IFNβ bioactivity was detected in 22% of the patients; (3) different biological phenomena and reduced compliance explain this absence; (4) identification of the reason for absence of IFN bioactivity improves patients' management.

Comparative study of four different assays for the detection of binding antibodies against interferon-beta

BACKGROUND

Binding antibodies (BAB) against interferon-beta (IFNbeta) are often determined as screening assays before performing an expensive and elaborate neutralizing antibody (NAB) test.

METHODS

In this study, we compared four BAB tests, a western blot (WB), a direct binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (dELISA), a capture ELISA (cELISA), and a commercial enzyme immuno-assay (EIA) in 325 multiple sclerosis patients with and without neutralizing antibodies to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity to detect NAB by receiver operating characteristics analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.907 for the dELISA, 0.925 for the cELISA, and 0.776 for the EIA (P < 0.0001 for all). At a sensitivity of 95%, the specificity was approximately 30% in the dELISA, 55% in the cELISA, and 13% in the EIA. The WB as a qualitative BAB detection method had a given sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 55%. There was a strong and significant correlation between high NAB titers (>500 neutralizing units [NU]) and titers obtained by all quantitative BAB assays. However, low to medium NAB titers (20-500 NU) did not significantly correlate with BAB titers.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the cELISA seems to be most suitable for NAB screening, but BAB titers cannot reliably predict NAB titers.