Maintenance IVIg therapy in myasthenia gravis does not affect disease activity

Low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in different immune-mediated conditions

IVIg has been used for a long time as a replacement therapy for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. Beside this supplementary role, when used at higher doses (i.e., 2 g/kg/monthly) it exerts an immunomodulatory role able to control multiple autoimmune and systemic inflammatory diseases. Several mechanisms of action have been described and hypothesized, nonetheless a synergistic action on the different component of the immune response seems to be crucial. The other side of the coin are the costs which showed an increase during the years due to the production of highly purified preparations which limit side reactions. This renders the product not easily accessible especially for low-income countries. Moreover, it is based on plasma donations that experienced a significant shrinkage after the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequences are still impactful. Due to the above-mentioned problems different authors tried to find out if a lower dosage of IVIg (< 2 g/kg/monthly) might exert an immunoregulatory role. In this review we aimed to summarize the current literature about a possible beneficial effect of a lower dosage of IVIg in multiple conditions that would help to treat a vast majority of patients. Even though in some cases (e.g., Kawasaki disease and immune thrombocytopenia) results are promising, for other conditions more research is needed.

Real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) among patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) over 3 years post-IVIg initiation.

METHODS

Patients with gMG who initiated IVIg treatment were identified from a United States claims database (Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse [IDV]®, January 1, 2014 - December 31, 2019). The frequency of subsequent IVIg treatment and associated cost during the year post-IVIg initiation were analyzed. Usage patterns of IVIg and concomitant gMG treatments during the year preceding and 3 years post-IVIg initiation were compared.

RESULTS

Among 1225 patients with gMG who initiated IVIg treatment, 706 patients (57.6%) received 1 to 5 IVIg treatment courses (intermittent IVIg users), and 519 patients (42.4%) received ≥6 IVIg treatment courses (chronic IVIg users) within the subsequent year. Mean annual medical cost per patient was nearly 2.5-fold higher for chronic vs. intermittent IVIg users ($161,478 vs. $64,888, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients using corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive treatments (NSISTs) was not reduced over the 3-year follow-up period following IVIg initiation, even for patients who continued annual chronic IVIg for 3 consecutive years post-initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients with gMG received chronic and multiple IVIg treatment courses within the first year once initiating IVIg treatment, indicating higher usage than expected. For all IVIg initiators, the proportion of patients using corticosteroids and NSISTs did not decrease over 3 years despite IVIg initiation.

One-year follow-up of disease burden and medication changes in patients with myasthenia gravis: From the MG Patient Registry

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

We studied the progression of myasthenia gravis (MG) disease burden and medication adjustment among MG Patient Registry participants.

METHODS

Participants diagnosed with MG (age ≥18 years), registered between July 1, 2013 and July 31, 2018 and completing both 6- and 12-month follow-up surveys, were included in this investigation. Participants were grouped into high-burden (Myasthenia Gravis Activity of Daily Living scale [MG-ADL] score ≥6) and low-burden (MG-ADL <6) groups based on MG-ADL scores at enrollment. Demographics and disease history were compared between groups. MG-ADL score change and medication changes (escalation, no change, de-escalation) between enrollment and 12-month follow-up were compared between groups. Minimal symptom expression (MSE, MG-ADL <2) at 12 months was compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to study factors associated with MSE at 12 months.

RESULTS

In total, 520 participants (56% female) were included in high-burden (n = 248) and low-burden (n = 272) groups. Those in the high-burden group were more likely to be younger, female, and have shorter disease duration. At 12 months, MSE was achieved in 6% of the high-burden group and newly achieved (42 of 201, 21%) or maintained (52 of 71, 73%) in the low-burden group. In the multivariable analysis, being in the high-burden group and use of pyridostigmine were associated with less likelihood of MSE, whereas MG-ADL score improvement (>2 or >20%) at 6 months significantly increased the likelihood of achieving MSE at 12 months (P = .0004).

DISCUSSION

In both groups, but more so in the high-burden group, patients infrequently achieved MSE after 1 year of MG treatment. Baseline low disease burden, improvement at 6 months and no pyridostigmine use were associated with a higher likelihood of MSE at 12 months.

An update on the use of immunoglobulins as treatment for myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody mediated disease where pathogenic antibodies interact with the acetylcholine receptor or other proteins at the post-synaptic neuromuscular junction. There is growing evidence that immunoglobulin infusions are beneficial for clinical exacerbations and chronic refractory disease and may be an option for patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies.

AREAS COVERED

We performed an extensive literature review, looking for evidence on the use of immunoglobulins for the treatment of MG, by conducting a search in MEDLINE (1946 to present), EMBASE (1947 to present) and Clinicaltrials.gov. We have included studies on the use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIG) for acute deterioration and chronic disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of IVIG in MG provides an option for rapid improvement in critical deterioration, being preferred over more invasive and less available therapies such as plasmapheresis. For refractory MG, the addition of IVIG can improve a patient's status and reduce the dosage of immunosuppressive medications. The alternative of SCIG is also effective and has advantages of infusion time flexibility, fewer side-effects, and patient independence. The safety and efficacy of both interventions, patient preferences and quality of life may direct therapeutic choices in the future.

Pharmacotherapy of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis with Special Emphasis on Newer Biologicals

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic, fluctuating, antibody-mediated autoimmune disorder directed against the post-synaptic neuromuscular junctions of skeletal muscles, resulting in a wide spectrum of manifestations ranging from mild to potentially fatal. Given its unique natural course, designing an ideal trial design for MG has been wrought with difficulties and evidence in favour of several of the conventional agents is weak as per current standards. Despite this, acetylcholinesterases and corticosteroids have remained the cornerstones of treatment for several decades with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) offering rapid treatment response, especially in crises. However, the treatment of MG entails long-term immunosuppression and conventional agents are viable options but take longer to act and have a number of class-specific adverse effects. Advances in immunology, translational medicine and drug development have seen the emergence of several newer biological agents which offer selective, target-specific immunotherapy with fewer side effects and rapid onset of action. Eculizumab is one of the newer agents that belong to the class of complement inhibitors and has been approved for the treatment of refractory general MG. Zilucoplan and ravulizumab are other agents in this group in clinical trials. Neisseria meningitis is a concern with all complement inhibitors, mandating vaccination. Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors prevent immunoglobulin recycling and cause rapid reduction in antibody levels. Efgartigimod is an FcRn inhibitor recently approved for MG treatment, and rozanolixizumab, nipocalimab and batoclimab are other agents in clinical trial development. Although lacking high quality evidence from randomized clinical trials, clinical experience with the use of anti-CD20 rituximab has led to its use in refractory MG. Among novel targets, interleukin 6 (IL6) inhibitors such as satralizumab are promising and currently undergoing evaluation. Cutting-edge therapies include genetically modifying T cells to recognise chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) and chimeric autoantibody receptors (CAAR). These may offer sustained and long-term remissions, but are still in very early stages of evaluation. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) allows immune resetting and offers sustained remission, but the induction regimens often involve serious systemic toxicity. While MG treatment is moving beyond conventional agents towards target-specific biologicals, lack of knowledge as to the initiation, maintenance, switching, tapering and long-term safety profile necessitates further research. These concerns and the high financial burden of novel agents may hamper widespread clinical use in the near future.

Current Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most extensively studied antibody-mediated disease in humans. Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of MG in the last century, resulting in a change of its natural course from a disease with poor prognosis with a high mortality rate in the early 20th century to a treatable condition with a large proportion of patients attaining very good disease control. This review summarizes the current treatment options for MG, including non-immunosuppressive and immunosuppressive treatments, as well as thymectomy and targeted immunomodulatory drugs.

Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome: New Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment

"Myasthenia Gravis is, like it or not, the neurologist's disease!" (Thomas Richards Johns II, MD Seminars in Neurology 1982). The most common disorders in clinical practice involving defective neuromuscular transmission are myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). The hallmark of weakness related to malfunction of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is variability in severity of symptoms from minute to minute and hour to hour. Fatigable weakness and fluctuation in symptoms are common in patients whether the etiology is autoimmune, paraneoplastic, genetic, or toxic. Autoimmune MG is the most common disorder of neuromuscular transmission affecting adults with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 10,000. While LEMS is comparatively rare, the unique clinical presentation, the association with cancer, and evolving treatment strategies require the neurologist to be familiar with its presentation, diagnosis, and management. In this paper we provide a summary of the meaningful recent clinical developments in the diagnosis and treatment of both MG and LEMS.

Update on Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Neurology: Modulating Neuro-autoimmunity, Evolving Factors on Efficacy and Dosing and Challenges on Stopping Chronic IVIg Therapy

In the last 25 years, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has had a major impact in the successful treatment of previously untreatable or poorly controlled autoimmune neurological disorders. Derived from thousands of healthy donors, IVIg contains IgG1 isotypes of idiotypic antibodies that have the potential to bind pathogenic autoantibodies or cross-react with various antigenic peptides, including proteins conserved among the "common cold"-pre-pandemic coronaviruses; as a result, after IVIg infusions, some of the patients' sera may transiently become positive for various neuronal antibodies, even for anti-SARS-CoV-2, necessitating caution in separating antibodies derived from the infused IVIg or acquired humoral immunity. IVIg exerts multiple effects on the immunoregulatory network by variably affecting autoantibodies, complement activation, FcRn saturation, FcγRIIb receptors, cytokines, and inflammatory mediators. Based on randomized controlled trials, IVIg is approved for the treatment of GBS, CIDP, MMN and dermatomyositis; has been effective in, myasthenia gravis exacerbations, and stiff-person syndrome; and exhibits convincing efficacy in autoimmune epilepsy, neuromyelitis, and autoimmune encephalitis. Recent evidence suggests that polymorphisms in the genes encoding FcRn and FcγRIIB may influence the catabolism of infused IgG or its anti-inflammatory effects, impacting on individualized dosing or efficacy. For chronic maintenance therapy, IVIg and subcutaneous IgG are effective in controlled studies only in CIDP and MMN preventing relapses and axonal loss up to 48 weeks; in practice, however, IVIg is continuously used for years in all the aforementioned neurological conditions, like is a "forever necessary therapy" for maintaining stability, generating challenges on when and how to stop it. Because about 35-40% of patients on chronic therapy do not exhibit objective neurological signs of worsening after stopping IVIg but express subjective symptoms of fatigue, pains, spasms, or a feeling of generalized weakness, a conditioning effect combined with fear that discontinuing chronic therapy may destabilize a multi-year stability status is likely. The dilemmas of continuing chronic therapy, the importance of adjusting dosing and scheduling or periodically stopping IVIg to objectively assess necessity, and concerns in accurately interpreting IVIg-dependency are discussed. Finally, the merit of subcutaneous IgG, the ineffectiveness of IVIg in IgG4-neurological autoimmunities, and genetic factors affecting IVIg dosing and efficacy are addressed.

Myasthenia gravis exacerbation in association with antibody overshoot following plasmapheresis

INTRODUCTION/AIM

Antibody overshoot following therapeutic plasmapheresis (PLEX) is defined by subsequent increase in antibody to levels exceeding those prior to removal. It has been infrequently described in the past, and its influence on the clinical course of myasthenia gravis (MG) remains unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of five patients with generalized MG treated with PLEX.

RESULTS

All five patients possessed antibodies against acetylcholine receptor (AChR-Ab). After undergoing 3 to 12 PLEX treatment sessions, AChR-Ab titer increased to a median of 1292% of the baseline level. The median interval from the last PLEX session to peak AChR-Ab detection was 6 wk. In four patients, AChR-Ab overshoot was associated with a clinical deterioration.

DISCUSSION

The AChR-Ab overshoot may occur following PLEX. In patients who deteriorate following PLEX treatment, the presence of antibody overshoot may serve as additional guidance for treatment adjustment.

Progress in the therapy of myasthenia gravis: getting closer to effective targeted immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies in myasthenia gravis and highlight newly approved, or pending approval, therapies with new biologics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preoperative IVIg is not needed to prevent myasthenic crisis in stable myasthenia gravis patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia, based on controlled data. Rituximab, if initiated early in new-onset myasthenia gravis, can lead to faster and more sustained remission even without immunotherapies in 35% of patients at 2 years. Biomarkers determining the timing for follow-up infusions in Rituximab-responding AChR-positive patients are discussed. Most patients with MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis treated with Rituximab have sustained long-term remission with persistent reduction of IgG4 anti-MuSK antibodies. Eculizumb in the extension REGAIN study showed sustained long-term pharmacological remissions and reduced exacerbations. Three new biologic agents showed promising results in phase-II controlled myasthenia gravis trials: Zilucoplan, a subcutaneous macrocyclic peptide inhibiting complement C5; Efgartigimod, an IgG1-derived Fc fragment binding to neonatal FcRn receptor; and Rozanolixizumab, a high-affinity anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody. Finally, the safety of ongoing myasthenia gravis immunotherapies during COVID19 pandemic is discussed.

SUMMARY

New biologics against B cells, complement and FcRn receptor, are bringing us closer to successful targeted immunotherapies in the chronic management of myasthenia gravis promising an exciting future for antibody-mediated neurological diseases.

Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proven beneficial in myasthenic crisis, but their role as maintenance therapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if maintenance therapy with low-dose IVIg improves clinical outcome and may be used as a steroid-sparing agent in myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of all MG patients treated with IVIg from January 2006 to December 2019. Long-term treatment response to IVIg was assessed by improvement in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification scale as primary end point, as well as the ability to reduce the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone as secondary end-point, in a follow-up period of 36 months.

RESULTS

109 patients were treated with IVIg. The mean follow-up time was 34.03 ± 5.5 months. Sixty-seven patients (61.4%) responded to therapy with at least one-point improvement of the MGFA scale. There was no statistical difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between IVIg responders and non-responders. The mean prednisone dose decreased significantly from 33.1 ± 14.5 mg at baseline to 7.2 ± 7.8 mg after 36 months of IVIg treatment (P < 0.0001), with the greatest effect after 6 months (33.1 ± 14.5 mg Vs. 17.9 ± 11.7 mg; P < 0.0001). In the follow-up period of 36 months, most patients (92.5%) remained clinically and pharmacologically stable under chronic IVIg treatment.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study demonstrates that chronic low-dose IVIg treatment in patients with MG improves clinical outcomes and has a prolonged and significant steroid-sparing effect over a period of 3 years.

What Is in the Neuromuscular Junction Literature?

ABSTRACT

This update covers recommendations for myasthenia gravis (MG) in patients with coronavirus 2019 disease as well as reports of the clinical features of patients with MG and coronavirus 2019. Updated advisory committee recommendations for the use of thymectomy in generalized MG are also provided. Other MG topics include lipoprotein receptor-4 and agrin antibody associations, factors influencing conversion of ocular to generalized MG, the use of rituximab for more recent onset disease, immunoglobulins for maintenance therapy, and fatigue and depression.

VNTR2/VNTR3 genotype in the FCGRT gene is associated with reduced effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis

Background:

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been commonly used to treat myasthenia gravis exacerbation, but is still ineffective in nearly 30% of patients. A variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the FCGRT gene has been found to reduce the efficiency of IgG biologics. However, whether the polymorphism influences the efficacy of IVIG in generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with exacerbations remains unknown.

Methods:

The distribution of VNTR genotypes was analyzed in 334 patients with MG. Varied VNTR alleles were determined by capillary electrophoresis and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Information of endogenous IgG levels were collected in patients without previous immunotherapy (n = 26). Medical records of patients who received IVIG therapy were retrospectively analyzed for therapeutic outcomes of IVIG treatment (n = 61). Patients whose Activities of Daily Living scores decreased by 2 or more points on day 14 were considered responders to the treatment.

Results:

The VNTR3/3 and VNTR2/3 genotypes were detected in 96.7% (323/334) and 3.4% (11/334) patients, respectively. Patients with VNTR2/3 heterozygosity had lower endogenous IgG levels than those with VNTR3/3 homozygosity (9.81 ± 2.61 g/L versus 12.41 ± 2.45g/L, p = 0.016). The response rate of IVIG therapy was 78.7% (48/61). All responders and nine non-responders were VNTR3/3 homozygotes, whereas all the patients with VNTR2/3 genotypes were non-responders (n = 4). In patients who took IVIG treatments, endogenous IgG levels were significantly lower in non-responders compared with responders (12.93 ± 2.24 g/L versus 8.85 ± 2.69 g/L, p = 0.006), especially in VNTR2/3 heterozygotes (7.86 ± 1.78 g/L, p = 0.001).

Conclusion:

The VNTR2/3 genotype could influence endogenous IgG levels and serve as a predictive marker for poor responses to IVIG in MG patients.

Treatment of refractory myasthenia gravis by double-filtration plasmapheresis and rituximab: A case series of nine patients and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease mediated by circulating autoantibodies (anti-AchR, anti-MuSK, etc.). More than 20% of myasthenic patients are refractory to conventional treatments (plasma exchange, IVIg, steroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil). Rituximab (B-lymphocyte-depleting anti-CD20) and apheresis (double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP] and immunoadsorption [IA]) are interesting therapeutic alternatives.

METHODS

This monocentric pilot study included nine refractory myasthenic patients (March 2018 to May 2020) treated by DFPP and/or IA associated with rituximab (375 mg/m² ). Clinical responses were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) score.

RESULTS

Average age of patients was 53 ± 17 years. Gender ratio (M/F) was 3:6. The combination of apheresis and rituximab reduced median MGFA score from IV to II after 12 months of follow-up. Clinical improvement assessed by MGFA score was sustained in the long-term for all patients, during an average follow-up of 14 ± 9 months, allowing them to be self-sufficient and out sick-leave. The median number of apheresis sessions was 7 (5-30). The dose of prednisolone was reduced in two patients from 40 mg/d and 30 mg/d to 7.5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. It was stopped in a patient who was taking 30 mg/d. No infectious, bleeding, or thrombosis complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

The combination of rituximab and DFPP was effective to treat refractory MG.

Update in the Management of Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) are the most common disorders of neuromuscular transmission in clinical practice. Disorders of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) are characterized by fluctuating and fatigable weakness and include autoimmune, toxic, and genetic conditions. Adults with NMJ disorders are most often antibody mediated, with MG being the most common, having a prevalence of approximately 1 in 10,000, and with women being affected about twice as often as men. This article focuses on advances in management of autoimmune MG and LEMS.

Chronic immunoglobulin maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long-term treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) includes symptomatic and course-modifying therapies that target the immune system. Recently, both intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) have emerged as viable options for chronic therapy, considering the favourable safety-efficacy profile and possible immunosuppressant sparing properties. The aim was to investigate the outcomes of the long-term care of generalized MG with immunoglobulin (Ig).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, repeated-measures design study. Charts of generalized MG patients, treated with IVIG/SCIG for at least 6 months, from January 2015 to January 2020, were analysed. The primary outcome was the mean change in Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) after treatment with Ig, comparing baseline to IVIG and SCIG treatment periods. Secondary outcomes included the changes in pyridostigmine, immunosuppressive medications and patient-reported outcome 'percentage of normal' (0%-100%).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated with chronic Ig therapy (30 IVIG/SCIG, three SCIG, one IVIG). The mean durations of IVIG and SCIG periods were 21.8 ± 19.4 (range 3-64) months and 19.5 ± 11.3 (range 5-45) months respectively. There was a significant reduction in MGII scores (27.7 ± 15.7 baseline; 22.0 ± 17.4 IVIG period; 19.5 ± 18.1 SCIG period; F = 17.9; d.f. = 1.7; P < 0.01), pyridostigmine and immunosuppressant use (P = 0.00). The outcome 'percentage of normal' had a significant positive association with both treatments (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that patients can be successfully transitioned to IVIG and from IVIG to SCIG in the chronic treatment of generalized MG with reductions in impairments and use of other medications and improvement in overall status with Ig therapy. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to clarify costs and comparative effectiveness.

Immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis in the era of biologics

No consensus has been reached on the ideal therapeutic algorithm for myasthenia gravis (MG). Most patients with MG require induction therapy with high doses of corticosteroids and maintenance with an immunosuppressant. Severe cases and acute worsening require intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis before oral immunosuppressants start having an effect. However, biologics are emerging as important therapeutic tools that promise to provide better corticosteroid sparing effects than standard treatments and can even induce remission. In particular, eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody against complement C5, has been approved by the FDA for refractory MG on the basis of a phase III trial. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that depletes peripheral B cells, has also been effective in many large uncontrolled series, although was not in a small phase III trial. Whether the newer anti-CD20 agents ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, ublituximab or inebilizumab will be more effective remains unclear. Belimumab, an antibody against the B cell trophic factor BAFF, was ineffective in phase III trials, and efgartigimod, which depletes antibodies, was effective in a phase II study. Some anti-cytokine agents relevant to MG immunopathogenesis also seem promising. Checkpoint inhibitors can trigger MG in some patients, necessitating early intervention. Increased availability of new biologics provides targeted immunotherapies and the opportunities to develop more specific therapies.

Maintenance immunosuppression in myasthenia gravis, an update

Therapies for myasthenia gravis (MG) include symptomatic and immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatment. Options for immunosuppression include corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, eculizumab, intravenous immunoglobulin, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy. The practical aspects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in MG are critically reviewed in this article. Application of one or more of these specific therapies is guided based on known efficacy, adverse effect profile, particular disease subtype and severity, and patient co-morbidities.

Safety of an Abbreviated Transition Period When Switching From Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Eculizumab in Patients with Treatment-Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Series

BACKGROUND Eculizumab is a terminal complement inhibitor used to treat myasthenia gravis in patients refractory (because of insufficient efficacy or intolerance) to other therapies, including intravenous immunoglobulin. However, information is lacking on how to transition patients from intravenous immunoglobulin to eculizumab, while avoiding a crossover effect of intravenous immunoglobulin and minimizing the risk of a transient worsening of symptoms if treatment that may be at least partially effective is interrupted. The aim of this study was to determine whether eculizumab can be safely initiated before complete intravenous immunoglobulin washout, using a standardized protocol. CASE REPORT A series of 13 patients with generalized treatment-refractory myasthenia gravis were transitioned to eculizumab 10-14 days after their last intravenous immunoglobulin infusion. Patients' clinical status was assessed before and 6 weeks after transition using the Myasthenia Gravis Composite Score. Most patients (8/13; 62%) had received ≥3 immunosuppressants as well as intravenous immunoglobulin. The median (range) Myasthenia Gravis Composite Score before and 6 weeks after transition was 21 (11-29) and 12 (6-18), respectively. Clinically significant improvements (score decrease ≥3) were observed in all patients. Two patients experienced mild myalgia during transition. CONCLUSIONS In this case series, patients with treatment-refractory myasthenia gravis were successfully transitioned to eculizumab 10-14 days after their last intravenous immunoglobulin infusion without any significant safety concerns.

IgPro20, the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra® study (PATH), and the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with subcutaneous IgG

Subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) administration may be preferred over the intravenous route (IVIG) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) because it minimizes ‘end of cycle’ treatment-related fluctuations, reduces systemic adverse effects, improves convenience/quality of life and potentially lowers overall costs. Early reports of the use of highly concentrated SCIG preparations suggested they were effective and well-tolerated in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. This was confirmed in the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra® study of 172 subjects randomized to receive maintenance therapy with placebo or one of two doses of IgPro20 (20% IgG stabilized with L-Proline) for 6 months. Risk of relapse was reduced by SCIG in a dose-related manner as compared with placebo. A total of 88% of polyneuropathy and treatment with hizentra subjects felt the subcutaneous method was ‘easy to learn’. Local adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, and systemic adverse events were infrequent. Some patients may prefer maintenance therapy with SCIG over IVIG.

Individualized immunoglobulin therapy in chronic immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies

Despite the well-recognized importance of immunoglobulin therapy individualization during the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), the pathway to best achieve optimization is unknown. There are many pharmacokinetic and immunobiologic variables that can potentially influence the appropriateness of any individual therapy. Although identification of specific autoantibodies and their targets has only been accomplished in a minority of patients with CIDP, already the diagnostic and treatment implications of specific autoantibody detection are being realized. Individual variability in IgG pharmacokinetic properties including IgG catabolic rates and distribution, as well as the IgG level necessary for disease control also require consideration during the optimization process. For optimization to be successful there must be a measure of treatment response that has a clinically meaningful interpretation. There are currently available well-defined and validated clinical assessment tools and outcome measures that are well suited for this purpose. While there remains much to learn on how best to manipulate immunopathology and immunoglobulin pharmacokinetics in the most favorable way, there currently exists an understanding of these principles to a degree sufficient to begin to develop rational and evidence-based treatment optimization strategies.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as monotherapy for myasthenia gravis during pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women with myasthenia gravis (MG) are at increased risk of complications and adverse outcomes, including the teratogenic effects of many drugs used to treat MG women of childbearing age. The effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) on other autoimmune mediated diseases has been extensively reported in recent years, although little is known about the role of IVIg in the treatment of MG during pregnancy. We designed this study to determine the effectiveness of IVIg as monotherapy during pregnancy for women with MG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five pregnant MG patients (mean age at delivery 36.4years, SD 5.8, range 29.4-45.2) were studied in 2013-14. Their treatment was switched to monthly IVIg cycles 2months before the pregnancy. Follow-up included monthly neurological QMG throughout the pregnancy and postpartum, obstetrical monitoring during monthly visits in the first two trimesters of the pregnancy, fortnightly visits between week 32 and week 36, and weekly visits after 36weeks, and neonatal follow-up after delivery.

RESULTS

We observed no exacerbations during pregnancy, delivery or post-partum. The mean QMG score at baseline (before pregnancy) was 7.4 points in five women with generalized forms of MG. The maximum mean value reached during pregnancy was 8.6 points. The mean pregnancy duration was 38 w+5 d. No infant with transient neonatal myasthenia gravis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that monotherapy with IVIg during pregnancy in MG patients could be promising, although confirmation is required in studies with larger populations.

Optimizing IgG therapy in chronic autoimmune neuropathies: a hypothesis driven approach

Prolonged intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is used for the chronic autoimmune neuropathies chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy, but the doses and treatment intervals are usually chosen empirically due to a paucity of data from dose-response studies. Recent studies of the electrophysiology and immunology of these diseases suggest that antibody-induced reversible dysfunction of nodes of Ranvier may play a role in conduction block and disability which responds to immunotherapy more rapidly than would be expected for demyelination or axonal damage per se. Clinical reports suggest that in some cases, the effects of each dose of IVIG may be transient, wearing-off before the next dose is due. These observations lead us to hypothesize that that therapeutic IgG acts by competing with pathologic autoantibodies and that individual patients may require different IgG levels for optimal therapeutic effects. Frequent IVIG dosing and weekly subcutaneous IgG have been tried as ways of continuously maintaining high serum IgG levels, resulting in stabilization of neuromuscular function in small case series. Frequent grip strength and disability measurements, performed by the patient at home and reported electronically, can be used to assess the extent and duration of responses to IgG doses. Individualization of IgG treatment regimens may optimize efficacy, minimize disability, and identify nonresponders.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as treatment for myasthenia gravis: current evidence and outcomes

We examined the current evidence for the efficacy of IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) in myasthenia gravis (MG) and the outcomes used to demonstrate this efficacy. There is class 1 evidence for the use of short-term IVIG in MG patients worsening MG and also good evidence for IVIG use in myasthenic crisis. For long-term maintenance therapy, controlled studies are lacking and the evidence is limited to class III retrospective studies. The clinical scales, serological, electrophysiological, and patient-reported quality of life outcomes with IVIG have been assessed. At this time, the quantitative myasthenia gravis score, a functional scale, remains the preferable outcome measure as it has demonstrated responsiveness in the clinical trial setting, but a scale incorporating patient-reported outcomes and the patients complaint of fatigue is likely to be preferable. The MG-composite is such a scale, but has measurement limitations that may reduce its sensitivity. Across trials, IVIG has generally been well tolerated.