Tumefactive demyelination and a malignant course in an MS patient during and following fingolimod therapy

Multiple faces of multiple sclerosis in the era of highly efficient treatment modalities: Lymphopenia and switching treatment options challenges daily practice

The expanded treatment landscape in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) has resulted in highly effective treatment options and complexity in managing disease- or drug-related events during disease progression. Proper decision-making requires thorough knowledge of the immunobiology of MS itself and an understanding of the main principles behind the mechanisms that lead to secondary autoimmunity affecting organs other than the central nervous system as well as opportunistic infections. The immune system is highly adapted to both environmental and disease-modifying agents. Immune reconstitution following cell depletion or cell entrapment therapies eliminates pathogenic aspects of the disease but can also lead to distorted immune responses with harmful effects. Atypical relapses occur with second-line treatments or after their discontinuation and require appropriate clinical decisions. Lymphopenia is a result of the mechanism of action of many drugs used to treat MS. However, persistent lymphopenia and cell-specific lymphopenia could result in disease exacerbation, secondary autoimmunity, or the emergence of opportunistic infections. Clinicians treating patients with MS should be aware of the multiple faces of MS under novel, efficient treatment modalities and understand the intricate brain-immune cell interactions in the context of an altered immune system. MS relapses and disease progression still occur despite the current treatment modalities and are mediated either by failure to control effector mechanisms inherent to MS pathophysiology or by new drug-related mechanisms. The multiple faces of MS due to the highly adapted immune system of patients impose the need for appropriate switching therapies that safeguard disease remission and further clinical improvement.

An update on the use of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder of the CNS manifested by recurrent attacks of neurological symptoms (related to focal inflammation) and gradual disability accrual (related to progressive neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation). Sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor (S1PR) modulators are a class of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing MS. The first S1PR modulator developed and approved for MS was fingolimod, followed by siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod. All are S1P analogues with different S1PR-subtype selectivity. They restrain the S1P-dependent lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes by binding the lymphocytic S1P-subtype-1-receptor. Depending on their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, they can also interfere with other biological functions.

AREAS COVERED

Our narrative review covers the PubMed English literature on S1PR modulators in MS until August 2022. We discuss their pharmacology, efficacy, safety profile, and risk management recommendations based on the results of phase II and III clinical trials. We briefly address their impact on the risk of infections and vaccines efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

S1PR modulators decrease relapse rate and may modestly delay disease progression in people with relapsing MS. Aside their established benefit, their place and timing within the long-term DMT strategy in MS, as well as their immunological effects in the new and evolving context of the post-COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination campaigns warrant further study.

Post marketing new adverse effects of oral therapies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of safety information about the post-marketing adverse effects of several disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) used to control multiple sclerosis (MS). Investigating the post-marketing side effects is required to manifest the safety of the appropriate therapy. Therefore, the present systematic review aimed to identify disease-modifying drugs used to control multiple sclerosis attacks and progress.

METHODS

The Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published until November 2020 based on the research strategy terms. Inclusion criteria involved all full texts exploring disease-modifying drugs used to control multiple sclerosis based on case reports and case series studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of case report studies.

RESULTS

In total, 25 articles that met the criteria for inclusion were retrieved in the present systematic review. The most side effects were observed with fingolimod and teriflunomide, respectively, while dimethyl fumarate had minor side effects.

CONCLUSION

The oral therapies have some significant post-marketing adverse effects that have been diagnosed in numerous case reports. Some of them are serious and must be noticed by neurologists. Accordingly, in this review, we assessed the post-marketing adverse effects of oral therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Immunopathology of Tumefactive Demyelinating Lesions-From Idiopathic to Drug-Related Cases

Tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDL) represent a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians, and in rare atypical cases a collaboration of a neuroradiologist, a neurologist, and a neuropathologist is warranted for accurate diagnosis. Recent advances in neuropathology have shown that TDL represent an umbrella under which many different diagnostic entities can be responsible. TDL can emerge not only as part of the spectrum of classic multiple sclerosis (MS) but also can represent an idiopathic monophasic disease, a relapsing disease with recurrent TDL, or could be part of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)- and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-associated disease. TDL can appear during the MS disease course, and increasingly cases arise showing an association with specific drug interventions. Although TDL share common features with classic MS lesions, they display some unique features, such as extensive and widespread demyelination, massive and intense parenchymal infiltration by macrophages along with lymphocytes (mainly T but also B cells), dystrophic changes in astrocytes, and the presence of Creutzfeldt cells. This article reviews the existent literature regarding the neuropathological findings of tumefactive demyelination in various disease processes to better facilitate the identification of disease signatures. Recent developments in immunopathology of central nervous system disease suggest that specific pathological immune features (type of demyelination, infiltrating cell type distribution, specific astrocyte pathology and complement deposition) can differentiate tumefactive lesions arising as part of MS, MOG-associated disease, and AQP4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Lessons from immunopathology will help us not only stratify these lesions in disease entities but also to better organize treatment strategies. Improved advances in tissue biomarkers should pave the way for prompt and accurate diagnosis of TDL leading to better outcomes for patients.

A Review of Clinical and Imaging Findings in Tumefactive Demyelination

OBJECTIVE. Tumefactive demyelination mimics primary brain neoplasms on imaging, often necessitating brain biopsy. This article reviews the literature for the clinical and radiologic findings of tumefactive demyelination in various disease processes to facilitate identification of tumefactive demyelination on imaging. CONCLUSION. Both clinical and radiologic findings must be integrated to distinguish tumefactive demyelinating lesions from similarly appearing lesions on imaging. Further research on the immunopathogenesis of tumefactive demyelination and associated conditions will elucidate their interrelationship.

Intense Hypermetabolic Tumefactive Demyelination on 18F-FDG PET and MRI Related to Multiple Sclerosis Relapse After Fingolimod Suspension

ABSTRACT

A 57-year-old woman with a history of multiple sclerosis presented with a 5-day history of progressive headache and confusion, followed by left hemiparesis. The patient had stopped her previous fingolimod usage during the last 8 weeks. Brain MRI and 18F-FDG PET showed a subcortical tumefactive lesion with an intense peripheric rim of hypermetabolism and central hypometabolism, with central hyperintensity, thin isointense rim, and peripheral finger-like "tentacles" of edema with an irregular and thick border enhancement on postcontrast T2-weighted MRI. Brain biopsy showed features suggestive of relapsing MS. The patient improved after methylprednisone and plasma exchange.

Tumefactive multiple sclerosis in association with fingolimod initiation and discontinuation

BACKGROUND

Tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) is a rare multiple sclerosis (MS) form that usually manifests as the initial presentation or in the early stages of MS.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate reports of TMS associated with fingolimod use.

METHODS

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and the medical literature were searched for cases of TMS occurring during or after fingolimod treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 29 TMS cases, 19 following fingolimod initiation and 10 following fingolimod discontinuation. In these cases, a TMS diagnosis occurred at a median of 7 years after MS diagnosis, and a median of 7 and 3 months following initiation and discontinuation of fingolimod, respectively. Twenty-two cases were assessed as possible and seven as probable from a causal association perspective. A much larger crude number of TMS reports was observed for fingolimod compared to other disease-modifying therapies.

CONCLUSION

TMS should be considered when a severe or atypical MS relapse occurs shortly after fingolimod initiation or discontinuation, and should prompt imaging evaluation and appropriate treatment initiation. Prescribers' awareness of the association between TMS and fingolimod may avoid unnecessary diagnostic procedures. In light of our findings, fingolimod (Gilenya) prescribing information was amended to include TMS in the Warnings and Precautions section.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in Western Iran

Objectives:

To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in the western Iranian population.

Methods:

This study was performed as a prospective observational study between March 2014 and October 2015. Sixty patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who were referred to the MS clinic of Imam Reza Hospital, which is affiliated with Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran, were treated with 0.5 mg oral fingolimod capsules once daily for 12 months. The outcomes were clinical and included the annualized relapse rate, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) change, proportion of relapse-free patient, and side effects.

Results:

An 85% reduction in the annualized relapse rate compared with the baseline (from 1.8±1.35 to 0.27±0.58, p=0.001) was observed, and 76.66% of patients were free from relapse after the 12-month intervention. In addition, a significant reduction of EDSS was measured from 3.32 at baseline to 2.97 (p=0.001). The overall adverse events in our study were similar to those in previous studies.

Conclusion:

The present study confirms the effectiveness of fingolimod as a second-line therapy in western Iranian RRMS patients. Fingolimod side effects were generally mild and tolerable.

Siponimod for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic central nervous system immune-mediated disease with an important inflammatory component associated with focal demyelination and widespread neurodegeneration. In most cases, the clinical presentation is relapsing-remitting, followed by a secondary progressive phase, characterized by disability accrual unrelated to relapses. In a minority, the phenotype is progressive from the beginning. Major therapeutic achievements have been made concerning the relapsing phase but modifying the evolution of progressive MS remains an unmet need. Areas covered: This review covers siponimod (BAF312), a new sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, and its role in the treatment of secondary progressive MS. The authors reviewed PubMed English literature using the keywords 'siponimod' or 'BAF312' and 'multiple sclerosis.' They also present the pharmacological profile of siponimod, as well as clinical efficacy and safety, with emphasis on the recently published results of a Phase III trial. Phase II data in relapsing MS are also summarized. Expert opinion: Siponimod may reduce the activity of the disease and has a modest effect on the gradual disability accrual. If approved, it may become one of the few available therapy options for secondary progressive MS.

Disease Exacerbation after the Cessation of Fingolimod Treatment in Japanese Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Objective In Japan, following the launch of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) after fingolimod as a disease-modifying drug in multiple sclerosis (MS), some patients switched from fingolimod to DMF. The aim of this study was to determine the follow-up status of MS patients who switched to DMF after fingolimod cessation. Methods Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in 19 patients with MS who switched to DMF were collected for at least for 6 months after fingolimod cessation. Results Ten patients (52.6%) experienced clinical or MRI exacerbation after fingolimod cessation. The peripheral blood lymphocyte counts at the time of fingolimod cessation in those with disease exacerbation were significantly lower than in those without exacerbation. The patients with disease exacerbation were further classified into three groups based on MRI findings: those with some new T2-weighted lesions with or without gadolinium (Gd) enhancement (group I), those with more new and/or enlarged T2-weighted lesions with Gd enhancement compared to pre-fingolimod induction (group II), and those with multifocal tumefactive demyelinating lesions. In group II, the clinical disease activity, which was similar to that at fingolimod initiation in group I, was higher than the clinical disease activity observed before fingolimod initiation. Conversely, group III exhibited unexpected new MRI findings that were not evident before fingolimod initiation. Conclusion Cessation of fingolimod might precipitate rebound or reactivation of clinical disease in patients with MS, and careful follow-up is necessary for patients who discontinue fingolimod.

Tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesions associated with fingolimod treatment: Report of 5 cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Fingolimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, which sequesters lymphocytes in lymph nodes and prevents them from entering the central nervous system. There have been increasing reports of severe rebounds with tumefactive demyelinatinglesions (TDLs) in patients with multiple sclerosis under fingolimod treatment, as well as following therapy discontinuation. Our objective is to review the clinico-radiological characteristics of patients with TDLs associated with fingolimod.

METHODS

Retrospective review of medical records of MS patients from our center, who were treated with fingolimod and developed TDLs. We review the literature.

RESULTS

We found 5 cases: 4 developed TDLs as rebounds after treatment cessation and 1 under treatment. The 4 rebound cases were women, with a mean age of 34.7 years (SD = 3.6) and a mean disease duration of 10.2 years (SD = 4.1). The mean duration of fingolimod treatment before discontinuation was 36.2 months (SD = 22.4) and the mean time lapse between treatment withdrawal and rebound was 9.75 weeks (SD = 7.4). The total pre-rebound lymphocyte count (cells/mm3) was 482.5 (SD = 325.7) and1017.5 (SD = 364.8) during rebound. The TDL patient under fingolimod was a 36-year-old man who had been on fingolimod for 32 months after switching from glatiramer acetate. TDLs were multiple in 2 cases and solitary in 3. Acute treatment for rebound included high dose steroids (5/5), plasma exchange (3/5) and rituximab (2/5). Treatment after fingolimod included rituximab (2/5), alemtuzumab (2/5) and glatiramer acetate (1/5).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study, along with similar reports in literature, highlights the need for close monitoring in patients who plan to switch from fingolimod to other treatments because of the risk of severe rebound. The etiopathogenic association between fingolimod and TDLs is not clear, but given the increasing reports of cases it should be taken into account for treatment selection in patients with this type of lesions.

Overexpression of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors on reactive astrocytes drives neuropathology of multiple sclerosis rebound after fingolimod discontinuation

We present the neuropathological description of an autoptic case of fatal rebound of disease activity after fingolimod discontinuation in a multiple sclerosis patient. MRI prior to the fatal outcome showed several large tumefactive demyelinating lesions. These lesions were characterized by prominent astrocytic gliosis, with a remarkable preponderance of large hypertrophic reactive astrocytes showing intense expression of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1. Prominent astrocytic gliosis was also diffusely observed in the normal-appearing white matter. Dysregulated sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling on astrocytes following fingolimod withdrawal might represent a possible contributing mechanism to disease rebound and might account for the unusual radiological and neuropathological features observed in the present case.

Multiple sclerosis treatment with fingolimod: profile of non-cardiologic adverse events

Fingolimod was the first oral medication approved for management of multiple sclerosis and is currently used by tens of thousands patients worldwide. Fingolimod acts via the sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor, maintaining peripheral lymphocytes entrapped in the lymph nodes. In consequence, there is a reduction in the infiltration of aggressive lymphocytes into the central nervous system. The drug is safe and effective, and its first hours of use are associated with related to S1P receptors in the heart. This side effect is well known by all doctors prescribing fingolimod. However, the drug has other potential adverse events that, although relatively rare, require awareness from the neurologist. Among these there are infections (herpes simplex, herpes zoster, Cryptococcus, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis, Molluscum Contagiosum, and leishmaniosis), lung and thyroid complications, refractory headaches, encephalopathy, vasculopathy, tumefactive lesions in magnetic resonance imaging and ophthalmological disorders. The present review lists the non-cardiologic adverse events that all neurologists prescribing fingolimod should be aware of.

Pattern Recognition of the Multiple Sclerosis Syndrome

During recent decades, the autoimmune disease neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), once broadly classified under the umbrella of multiple sclerosis (MS), has been extended to include autoimmune inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system (CNS), which are now diagnosable with serum serological tests. These antibody-mediated inflammatory diseases of the CNS share a clinical presentation to MS. A number of practical learning points emerge in this review, which is geared toward the pattern recognition of optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, brainstem/cerebellar and hemispheric tumefactive demyelinating lesion (TDL)-associated MS, aquaporin-4-antibody and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody NMOSD, overlap syndrome, and some yet-to-be-defined/classified demyelinating disease, all unspecifically labeled under MS syndrome. The goal of this review is to increase clinicians’ awareness of the clinical nuances of the autoimmune conditions for MS and NMSOD, and to highlight highly suggestive patterns of clinical, paraclinical or imaging presentations in order to improve differentiation. With overlay in clinical manifestations between MS and NMOSD, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, orbits and spinal cord, serology, and most importantly, high index of suspicion based on pattern recognition, will help lead to the final diagnosis.

Neurological safety of fingolimod: An updated review

Fingolimod (FTY) is the first oral medication approved for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Its effectiveness and safety were confirmed in several phase III clinical trials, but proper evaluation of safety in the real patient population requires long‐term post‐marketing monitoring. Since the approval of FTY for RRMS in Japan in 2011, it has been administered to approximately 5000 MS patients, and there have been side‐effect reports from 1750 patients. Major events included infectious diseases, hepatobiliary disorders, nervous system disorders and cardiac disorders. In the present review, we focus especially on central nervous system adverse events. The topics covered are: (i) clinical utility of FTY; (ii) safety profile; (iii) post‐marketing adverse events in Japan; (iv) white matter (tumefactive) lesions; (v) rebound after FTY withdrawal; (vi) relationship between FTY and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; (vii) FTY and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy‐related immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; and (viii) neuromyelitis optica and leukoencephalopathy.

Extensive white matter lesions after 2 years of fingolimod: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy or MS relapse?

BACKGROUND

Fingolimod is a widely used treatment for highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the case of a 27-year-old patient treated for more than 2 years by Fingolimod, who presented hemiplegia and speech disturbances associated with extensive white matter lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Case study.

RESULTS

Although initial presentation questioned the possibility of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, final diagnosis was multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. Appropriate treatment resulted in clinical and radiological improvement.

CONCLUSION

Severe MS relapses under Fingolimod have been reported, but late onset after treatment initiation and extensive subcortical topography is unusual and represents a diagnostic challenge.

Altered T cell phenotypes associated with clinical relapse of multiple sclerosis patients receiving fingolimod therapy

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Fingolimod, a highly effective disease-modifying drug for MS, retains CCR7⁺ central memory T cells in which autoaggressive T cells putatively exist, in secondary lymphoid organs, although relapse may still occur in some patients. Here, we analyzed the T cell phenotypes of fingolimod-treated, fingolimod-untreated patients, and healthy subjects. The frequency of CD56⁺ T cells and granzyme B-, perforin-, and Fas ligand-positive T cells significantly increased during fingolimod treatment. Each T cell subpopulation further increased during relapse. Interestingly, T cells from fingolimod-treated patients exhibited interferon-γ biased production, and more myelin basic protein-reactive cells was noted in CD56⁺ than in CD56⁻ T cells. It is likely that the altered T cell phenotypes play a role in MS relapse in fingolimod-treated patients. Further clinical studies are necessary to investigate whether altered T cell phenotypes are a biomarker for relapse under fingolimod therapy.

[A case of multiple sclerosis who relapsed early after fingolimod therapy introduced]

The patient was a 46-year-old woman having a history of multiple sclerosis (MS) for 14 years. She had been treated with interferon β-1b since 2001, but discontinued because of psychiatric problems in 2006. Thereafter relapses were observed 1-2 times a year, and EDSS became 2.5 to 6.5. In April 2012, relapse of MS was noticed and the patient received introduction of fingolimod (FTY) after methylprednisolone (mPSL) pulse therapy. Twenty days later, dysarthria and lower limb weakness were appeared. Brain MRI showed more than 20 several millimeter Gd enhanced lesions in periventricular white matter, juxta-cortical white matter, and cerebellum. Careful determination and observation are required upon the FTY administration into the MS with high frequency of relapse.

Effect of Fingolimod on Platelet Count Among Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Background:

While many studies have previously focused on fingolimod's effect on immune cells, the effect it has on circulating and local central nervous system platelets (Plts) has not yet been investigated. This study will elucidate what effects fingolimod treatment has on multiple sclerosis (MS) patients’ plasma Plt levels. In addition, it will propose possible reasoning for these effects and suggest further investigation into this topic.

Methods:

This quasi-experimental study used patients from the Isfahan Multiple Sclerosis Society to produce a subject pool of 80 patients, including 14 patients who ceased fingolimod use due to complications. The patients had their blood analyzed to determine Plt levels both 1-month prior to fingolimod treatment and 1-month after fingolimod treatment had been started.

Results:

The mean level of Plts before initiation of fingolimod therapy (Plt1) among these MS patients was 256.53 ± 66.26. After 1-month of fingolimod treatment, the Plt level yielded an average of 229.96 ± 49.67 (Plt2). This number is significantly lower than the average Plt count before treatment (P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

MS patients taking oral fingolimod treatment may be at risk for side-effects caused by low Plt levels. This may not be a factor for patients with higher or normal Plt levels. However, a patient with naturally low Plt levels may experience a drop below the normal level and be at risk for excessive bleeding. In addition to these possible harmful side-effects, the decreased Plt population may pose positive effects for MS patients.

Fingolimod for multiple sclerosis and emerging indications: appropriate patient selection, safety precautions, and special considerations

Fingolimod (FTY720), an immunotherapeutic drug targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor, is a widely used medication for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Apart from the pivotal Phase III trials demonstrating efficacy against placebo and interferon-β-1a once weekly, sufficient clinical data are now available to assess its real-world efficacy and safety profile. Approved indications of fingolimod differ between countries. This discrepancy, to some extent, reflects the intermediate position of fingolimod in the expanding lineup of MS medications. With individualization of therapy, appropriate patient selection gets more important. We discuss various scenarios for fingolimod use in relapsing-remitting MS and their pitfalls: as first-line therapy, as escalation therapy after failure of previous immunotherapies, and as de-escalation therapy following highly potent immunotherapies. Potential side effects such as bradycardia, infections, macular edema, teratogenicity, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy as well as appropriate safety precautions are outlined. Disease reactivation has been described upon fingolimod cessation; therefore, patients should be closely monitored for MS activity for several months after stopping fingolimod. Finally, we discuss preclinical and clinical data indicating neuroprotective effects of fingolimod, which might open the way to future indications such as stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Tumefactive demyelination presenting during bevacizumab treatment

We report the emergence of tumefactive demyelination during treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin). This is of particular significance given that bevacizumab is currently being assessed as a potential treatment option for neuromyelitis optica, another demyelinating condition.

Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Fingolimod is a selective immunosuppressive agent approved worldwide for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic and potentially disabling neurological condition. Randomized double-blind clinical trials have shown that fingolimod significantly reduces relapse rate and ameliorates a number of brain MRI measures, including cerebral atrophy, compared to both placebo and intramuscular interferon-β1a. The effect on disability progression remains controversial, since one Phase III trial showed a significant benefit of treatment while two others did not. Although fingolimod has a very convenient daily oral dosing, the possibility of serious cardiac, ocular, infectious, and other rare adverse events justified the decision of the European Medicines Agency to approve the drug as a second-line treatment for MS patients not responsive to first-line therapy, or those with rapidly evolving course. In the United States, fingolimod is instead authorized as a first-line treatment. The aim of this review is to describe and discuss the characteristics of fingolimod concerning its efficacy, safety, and tolerability in the clinical context of multiple sclerosis management.

Neuro-oncology dilemma: Tumour or tumefactive demyelinating lesion

Tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs) are not an uncommon manifestation of demyelinating disease but can pose diagnostic challenges in patients without a pre-existing diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) as well as in known MS patients. Brain tumours can also arise in MS patients and can be seen in chronic MS patients as co-morbidities. Delayed diagnosis or unnecessary intervention or treatment will affect the ultimate prognosis of these patients. In this article, we will review some typical cases illustrating the dilemma and review the information that helps to differentiate the two conditions. The intention is not to present an extensive differential diagnosis of both entities, but to examine some typical examples when the decision arises to decide between the two. We take a somewhat different approach, by presenting the cases in "real time", allowing the readers to consider in their own minds which diagnosis they favour, discussing in detail some of the pertinent literature, then revealing later the actual diagnosis. We would urge readers to consider re-visiting their first thoughts about each case after reading the discussion, before reading the follow-up of each case. The overall objective is to highlight the real possibility of being forced to decide between these two entities in clinical practise, present a reasonable approach to help differentiate them and especially to focus on the possibility of TDLs in order to avoid unnecessary biopsy.

Patient experience and practice trends in multiple sclerosis - clinical utility of fingolimod

Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate pathway with orally available immune-modulatory fingolimod (Gilenya™) therapy ameliorates relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) by decreasing relapse rate as shown in FREEDOMS and TRANSFORMS. Fingolimod has also been shown to be superior to interferon-beta therapy as evidenced by TRANSFORMS. Albeit multiple benefits in treatment of multiple sclerosis including high efficacy and ease of administration, potential untoward effects such as cardiotoxicity, risk of infection, and cancer exist, thus mandating careful screening and frequent monitoring of patients undergoing treatment with fingolimod. This review outlines mechanism of action, observations, side effects, and practice guidelines on use of fingolimod in treatment of RRMS.