Efficacy and Safety of Ponesimod Compared with Teriflunomide in Female Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from the Pivotal OPTIMUM Study

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is threefold more prevalent in women than men. However, sex-specific efficacy analysis for MS disease-modifying therapies is not typically performed. Methods: Post hoc analyses of data from female patients enrolled in the phase 3, double-blind OPTIMUM study of relapsing MS were carried out. Eligible adults were randomized to ponesimod 20 mg or teriflunomide 14 mg once daily for up to 108 weeks. The primary endpoint was annualized relapse rate (ARR); secondary endpoints included change in symptom domain of Fatigue Symptom and Impact Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) at week 108, number of combined unique active lesions (CUALs) per year on magnetic resonance imaging, and time to 12- and 24-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA). Results: A total of 735 female patients (581 of childbearing potential) were randomized to ponesimod (n = 363, 49.4%) or teriflunomide (n = 372, 50.6%). Relative risk reduction in the ARR for ponesimod versus teriflunomide was 33.1% (mean, 0.192 vs. 0.286, respectively; p < 0.002). Mean difference in FSIQ-RMS for ponesimod versus teriflunomide was -4.34 (0.12 vs. 4.46; p = 0.002); rate ratio in CUALs per year, 0.601 (1.45 vs. 2.41; p < 0.0001), and hazard ratio for time to 12- and 24-week CDA risk estimates, 0.83 (10.7% vs. 12.9%; p = 0.38) and 0.91 (8.8% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.69), respectively. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups (89.0% and 90.1%). Conclusions: Analyses demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ponesimod, versus active comparator, for women with relapsing MS, supporting data-informed decision-making for women with MS. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02425644.

Ponesimod-Associated Macular Edema: Onset and Resolution

Purpose: To present a patient with cystoid macular edema (CME) associated with ponesimod use and offer suggestions for the management of this condition. Methods: A case report is presented. Results: A 75-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis had an unremarkable baseline ophthalmic examination prior to starting ponesimod. At her 9-month follow-up, an examination showed the development of CME in the left eye. The patient's macular edema fully resolved after transitioning off ponesimod to an alternative systemic medication and starting treatment with a topical corticosteroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first case report discussing the entity and management of ponesimod-associated macular edema. Ponesimod cessation and concomitant topical therapy can result in successful resolution of macular edema.

FTY720 requires vitamin B12-TCN2-CD320 signaling in astrocytes to reduce disease in an animal model of multiple sclerosis

Vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency causes neurological manifestations resembling multiple sclerosis (MS); however, a molecular explanation for the similarity is unknown. FTY720 (fingolimod) is a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator and sphingosine analog approved for MS therapy that can functionally antagonize S1P1. Here, we report that FTY720 suppresses neuroinflammation by functionally and physically regulating the B12 pathways. Genetic and pharmacological S1P1 inhibition upregulates a transcobalamin 2 (TCN2)-B12 receptor, CD320, in immediate-early astrocytes (ieAstrocytes; a c-Fos-activated astrocyte subset that tracks with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [EAE] severity). CD320 is also reduced in MS plaques. Deficiency of CD320 or dietary B12 restriction worsens EAE and eliminates FTY720's efficacy while concomitantly downregulating type I interferon signaling. TCN2 functions as a chaperone for FTY720 and sphingosine, whose complex induces astrocytic CD320 internalization, suggesting a delivery mechanism of FTY720/sphingosine via the TCN2-CD320 pathway. Taken together, the B12-TCN2-CD320 pathway is essential for the mechanism of action of FTY720.

Bioavailable central nervous system disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis

Disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis reduce relapse rates by suppressing peripheral immune cells but have limited efficacy in progressive forms of the disease where cells in the central nervous system play a critical role. To our knowledge, alemtuzumab, fumarates (dimethyl, diroximel, and monomethyl), glatiramer acetates, interferons, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and teriflunomide are either limited to the periphery or insufficiently studied to confirm direct central nervous system effects in participants with multiple sclerosis. In contrast, cladribine and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, and siponimod) are central nervous system-penetrant and could have beneficial direct central nervous system properties.

An update on the use of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder of the CNS manifested by recurrent attacks of neurological symptoms (related to focal inflammation) and gradual disability accrual (related to progressive neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation). Sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor (S1PR) modulators are a class of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing MS. The first S1PR modulator developed and approved for MS was fingolimod, followed by siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod. All are S1P analogues with different S1PR-subtype selectivity. They restrain the S1P-dependent lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes by binding the lymphocytic S1P-subtype-1-receptor. Depending on their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, they can also interfere with other biological functions.

AREAS COVERED

Our narrative review covers the PubMed English literature on S1PR modulators in MS until August 2022. We discuss their pharmacology, efficacy, safety profile, and risk management recommendations based on the results of phase II and III clinical trials. We briefly address their impact on the risk of infections and vaccines efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

S1PR modulators decrease relapse rate and may modestly delay disease progression in people with relapsing MS. Aside their established benefit, their place and timing within the long-term DMT strategy in MS, as well as their immunological effects in the new and evolving context of the post-COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination campaigns warrant further study.

S1P2-Gα12 Signaling Controls Astrocytic Glutamate Uptake and Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption

Glutamate is the principal excitatory neurotransmitter in the human brain. Following neurotransmission, astrocytes remove excess extracellular glutamate to prevent neurotoxicity. Glutamate neurotoxicity has been reported in multiple neurologic diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS), representing a shared neurodegenerative mechanism. A potential modulator of glutamate neurotoxicity is the bioactive lysophospholipid sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) that signals through five cognate G-protein-coupled receptors, S1P₁-S1P₅; however, a clear link between glutamate homeostasis and S1P signaling has not been established. Here, S1P receptor knock-out mice, primary astrocyte cultures, and receptor-selective chemical tools were used to examine the effects of S1P on glutamate uptake. S1P inhibited astrocytic glutamate uptake in a dose-dependent manner and increased mitochondrial oxygen consumption, primarily through S1P₂ Primary cultures of wild-type mouse astrocytes expressed S1P_1,2,3 transcripts, and selective deletion of S1P₁ and/or S1P₃ in cerebral cortical astrocytes, did not alter S1P-mediated, dose-dependent inhibition of glutamate uptake. Pharmacological antagonists, S1P₂-null astrocytes, and Gα₁₂ hemizygous-null astrocytes indicated that S1P₂-Gα₁₂-Rho/ROCK signaling was primarily responsible for the S1P-dependent inhibition of glutamate uptake. In addition, S1P exposure increased mitochondrial oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) in wild-type astrocytes and reduced OCRs in S1P₂-null astrocytes, implicating receptor selective metabolic consequences of S1P-mediated glutamate uptake inhibition. Astrocytic S1P-S1P₂ signaling increased extracellular glutamate, which could contribute to neurotoxicity. This effect was not observed with the FDA-approved S1P receptor modulators, siponimod and fingolimod. Development and use of S1P₂-selective antagonists may provide a new approach to reduce glutamate neurotoxicity in neurologic diseases.

The Synergistic Anti-Apoptosis Effects of Amniotic Epithelial Stem Cell Conditioned Medium and Ponesimod on the Oligodendrocyte Cells

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. The current treatment of Multiple sclerosis is based on anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatments, which can not regenerate myelin and eventually neurons. So, we need new approaches for axonal protection and remyelination. Amniotic epithelial stem cells amniotic epithelial cells, as a neuroprotective and neurogenic agent, are a proper source in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Due to differentiation capability and secretion of growth factors, AECs can be a candidate for the treatment of MS. Moreover, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators were recently approved by FDA for MS. Ponesimod is an S1P receptor-1 modulator that acts selectively as an anti-inflammatory agent and provides a suitable microenvironment for the function of the other neuroprotective agents. In this study, due to the characteristics of AECs, they are considered a treatment option in MS. The conditioned medium of AECs concurrently with ponesimod was used to evaluate the viability of the oligodendrocyte cell line after induction of cell death by cuprizone. Cell viability after treatment by conditioned medium and ponesimod was increased compared to untreated groups. Also, the results showed that combination therapy with CM and ponesimod had a synergistic anti-apoptotic effect on oligodendrocyte cells. The combination treatment with CM and ponesimod reduced the expression of caspase-3, caspase-8, Bax, and Annexin V proteins and increased the relative BCL-2/Bax ratio, indicating inhibition of apoptosis as a possible mechanism of action. Based on these promising results, combination therapy with amniotic stem cells and ponesimode could be a proper alternative for multiple sclerosis treatment.

Emerging systemic drugs in the treatment of plaque psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects 2-3% of the US population and represents a large psychosocial burden for patients. Over the last decade, highly effective targeted therapies for psoriasis have been developed - namely, those targeting interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23. The success of biologic agents targeting IL-17 and IL-23 underscores the importance of the IL-23/T helper (Th)17 cell axis in psoriasis pathogenesis. Oral small molecule drugs - such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors, and fumaric acid esters (FAEs) - are also being investigated for the treatment of psoriasis.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews systemic biologic and oral small molecule drugs currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

Many patients with psoriasis have mild disease, and many with mild disease do not seek medical care for their condition. Many patients with mild disease could be adequately treated with topical treatments and phototherapy; however, adherence and feasibility have often been an issue with these treatment types. There seems to be limited room for development of novel biologics, as the existing ones are extraordinarily safe, effective, and convenient with few injections. Patients would prefer a safe, effective oral treatment; however, JAK inhibitors seem unlikely to fill this role completely.

Progressive multiple sclerosis: latest therapeutic developments and future directions

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the central nervous system leading to demyelination and neurodegeneration. While the initial presentation is mostly characterized by a relapsing–remitting disease, patients often progress naturally after 10–15 years to a secondary-progressive disease course. Another 10–15% present with an initial, primary-progressive MS course. Pathogenic mechanisms possibly driving progression include continued compartmentalized inflammation by T- and B-lymphocytes and cells of innate immunity, oxidative stress, iron accumulation, and consecutive mitochondrial damage, altogether leading to neurodegeneration with accumulation of disability. Increasing knowledge about pathogenic mechanisms involved in progressive MS helps to design more specific and precise therapeutic approaches. Successful examples are the B-cell targeting monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab, effective in primary progressive MS, and the sphingosine-1-receptor modulator siponimod, effective in active forms of secondary-progressive MS. Apart from that, other medications such as the B-cell targeted antibody ofatumumab, cladribine due to T- and B-cell depletion, and other sphingosine-1-receptor modulators such as ozanimod and ponesimod are under development. Moreover, some therapeutic approaches in preclinical stages are under development. In this review, we will summarize the newest therapeutic development in the field of progressive MS of the last 3 years, and shed light on auspicious substances with similar mechanisms and new developments in the therapeutic pipeline, presumably supporting a bright future for progressive MS treatment.

Ponesimod, a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P1) receptor modulator for autoimmune diseases: review of clinical pharmacokinetics and drug disposition

1. Ponesimod, a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P₁) receptor modulator, is undergoing clinical development for the treatment of autoimmune diseases (multiple sclerosis/psoriasis). 2. Published literature data describing pharmacokinetic disposition of ponesimod were collected, reviewed and tabulated. 3. Across various clinical phase-I studies, ponesimod displayed consistent pharmacokinetics - relatively faster absorption peak time (approximately 2.5 h), elimination half-life of approximately 30 h and modest accumulation (2- to 2.6-fold). Ponesimod was extensively metabolized and two major metabolites were ACT-204426 and ACT-338375. 4. Extensive population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling has confirmed the therapeutic dose(s) for ponesimod to achieve the balance between safety (primarily heart rate) and efficacy using the maximum inhibition of the total lymphocytes as the pharmacodynamic marker. 5. None of the covariates (ethnicity, body weight, sex, diseased state including multiple sclerosis and psoriasis, food intake, formulation, etc.) examined in population pharmacokinetic model influenced the pharmacokinetics of ponesimod from a clinical relevance perspective. However, hepatic impairment (moderate/severe but not mild), profoundly influenced its disposition; and therefore, would necessitate dosage adjustment of ponesimod in clinical therapy. 6. Ponesimod has a favorable safety profile and pharmacokinetics, which will allow maximizing its ability to inhibit circulating lymphocytes in a given dosing regimen for treating autoimmune diseases.

Effects of multiple-dose ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator, on lymphocyte subsets in healthy humans

This study investigated the effects of ponesimod, a selective S1P₁ receptor modulator, on T lymphocyte subsets in 16 healthy subjects. Lymphocyte subset proportions and absolute numbers were determined at baseline and on Day 10, after once-daily administration of ponesimod (10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg each consecutively for 3 days) or placebo (ratio 3:1). The overall change from baseline in lymphocyte count was -1,292±340×10⁶ cells/L and 275±486×10⁶ cells/L in ponesimod- and placebo-treated subjects, respectively. This included a decrease in both T and B lymphocytes following ponesimod treatment. A decrease in naïve CD4⁺ T cells (CD45RA⁺CCR7⁺) from baseline was observed only after ponesimod treatment (-113±98×10⁶ cells/L, placebo: 0±18×10⁶ cells/L). The number of T-cytotoxic (CD3⁺CD8⁺) and T-helper (CD3⁺CD4⁺) cells was significantly altered following ponesimod treatment compared with placebo. Furthermore, ponesimod treatment resulted in marked decreases in CD4⁺ T-central memory (CD45RA^-CCR7⁺) cells (-437±164×10⁶ cells/L) and CD4⁺ T-effector memory (CD45RA^-CCR7^-) cells (-131±57×10⁶ cells/L). In addition, ponesimod treatment led to a decrease of -228±90×10⁶ cells/L of gut-homing T cells (CLA^-integrin β7⁺). In contrast, when compared with placebo, CD8⁺ T-effector memory and natural killer (NK) cells were not significantly reduced following multiple-dose administration of ponesimod. In summary, ponesimod treatment led to a marked reduction in overall T and B cells. Further investigations revealed that the number of CD4⁺ cells was dramatically reduced, whereas CD8⁺ and NK cells were less affected, allowing the body to preserve critical viral-clearing functions.

Mitigation of Initial Cardiodynamic Effects of the S1P1 Receptor Modulator Ponesimod Using a Novel Up-Titration Regimen

Ponesimod, a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 modulator, leads to a reduction in circulating total lymphocyte count and transient decreases in heart rate (HR). Based on a modeling and simulation approach, this study was conducted to investigate whether a gradual up-titration regimen may mitigate these cardiodynamic effects. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-way crossover study, 32 healthy participants (15 males) received placebo on day 1 followed by multiple-dose administration of either ponesimod or placebo (ratio 3:1). Ponesimod was administered alternately using regimen A (incremental dose increase from 2 to 20 mg in 9 steps) or B (10 mg for 7 days followed by a single-dose administration of 20 mg). Cardiodynamic (Holter and 12-lead ECG), pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (total lymphocyte count), and safety variables were assessed. After first-dose ponesimod administration (day 2), a transient decrease in HR was observed (nadir 2-3 hours postdose, back to predose values within 4-5 hours) of approximately 6 and 12 beats/min (bpm) (mean) following regimens A and B, respectively. On day 2, occurrence of HR <45 bpm, HR decrease from baseline of over 20 bpm, PR interval ≥200 milliseconds, or PR interval increase from baseline >20 ms, was lower following regimen A than B (14 vs 43 events). During the course of the study, incidence of HR <45 bpm was lower following regimen A than B (20 vs 58 events). Fewer participants reported adverse events following regimen A than B. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were similar between the regimens. The novel gradual up-titration with ponesimod markedly mitigated initial cardiodynamic effects.

Clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety aspects of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators

INTRODUCTION

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, of which one has received marketing approval and several others are in clinical development, display promising potential in the treatment of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases.

AREAS COVERED

Administration of S1P1 receptor modulators leads to functional receptor antagonism triggering sustained inhibition of the egress of lymphocytes from lymphoid organs. First-dose administration is associated with transient cardiovascular effects. We compiled and discussed available pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data of selective and non-selective S1P receptor modulators that were investigated in recent years.

EXPERT OPINION

The safety profile of S1P receptor modulators is considered better than other classes of immunomodulators and was further improved by the development of up-titration regimens to mitigate first-dose effects. S1P receptor modulators display similar pharmacodynamic effects but have very different pharmacokinetic profiles. Drugs with a rapid elimination are of interest in case of opportunistic infections or pregnancy, whereas the need of re-initiation of up-titration in case of treatment interruption can present a challenge.

Mass balance, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the selective S1P1 receptor modulator ponesimod in humans

1. Ponesimod [(R)-5-[3-chloro-4-(-2,3-dihydroxy-propoxy)-benzylidene]-2-propylimino-3-o-tolyl-thiazolidin-4-one] is an orally administered, selective S1P1 receptor modulator that blocks the egress of lymphocytes from lymphoid organs and reduces the availability of circulating effector T/B-cells. 2. The mass balance, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 40 mg (14)C-ponesimod were investigated in six healthy male subjects. The total radioactivity in whole blood, plasma, urine, faeces and expired CO2 was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Metabolite profiling was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography and detection by mass spectrometry. 3. The majority of the radioactivity (% of administered dose) was recovered in faeces (57.3-79.6%), followed by urine (10.3-18.4%) and a small proportion in CO2 from expired air (0.6-1.9%). The average cumulative recovery (mass balance) of (14)C-associated radioactivity in faeces and urine was 77.9% of the administered dose. Unchanged ponesimod made up 25.9% of total radioactivity in faeces; none was detected in urine. Ponesimod was extensively metabolised and two pharmacologically inactive metabolites, M12 (ACT-204426) and M13 (ACT-338375), were detected in the circulation. M12 corresponded to 8.1% and M13 to 25.7% of the total drug-related radioactive exposure (AUC0-∞) in plasma. M12 was highly abundant in faeces (22.3% of total radioactivity) and to a smaller extent in urine (2.5% of total radioactivity).

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator, in the first-in-human study

AIMS

This study investigated the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, a novel oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P1) receptor modulator in development for the treatment of auto-immune diseases.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending, single-dose study. Healthy male subjects received doses of 1-75 mg or placebo control.

RESULTS

Ponesimod was well tolerated. Starting with a dose of 8 mg, transient asymptomatic reductions in heart rate were observed. Ponesimod pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. The median time to maximal concentration ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 h, and ponesimod was eliminated with a mean half-life varying between 21.7 and 33.4 h. Food had a minimal effect on ponesimod pharmacokinetics. Doses of ≥8 mg reduced total lymphocyte count in a dose-dependent manner. Lymphocyte counts returned to normal ranges within 96 h. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed that adequately described the observed effects of ponesimod on total lymphocyte counts.

CONCLUSIONS

Single doses of ponesimod up to and including 75 mg were well tolerated. The results of this ascending single-dose study indicate an immunomodulator potential for ponesimod and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile consistent with once-a-day dosing.

Multiple-dose tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, an S1P1 receptor modulator: favorable impact of dose up-titration

This multiple-ascending-dose study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, an S1P1 receptor modulator and a potential new treatment for autoimmune diseases. In part A, 10 healthy male and female subjects received once daily oral doses of ponesimod (5, 10, or 20 mg) or placebo for 7 days. Sinus bradycardia and, in some subjects, atrioventricular (AV) block occurred primarily on the first day of dosing, as desensitization developed to ponesimod-induced heart rate (HR) reduction and PR-prolongation. This elicited the design of an up-titration schedule in 17 subjects to a dose of 40 mg in part B. The up-titration regimen reduced HR and PQ/PR effects. Reported adverse events were mainly related to the cardiac and respiratory systems. Respiratory effects increased with higher doses. Ponesimod multiple-dose pharmacokinetics were slightly more than dose-proportional and characterized by a time to maximum concentration and an elimination half-life varying from 2.5 to 4.0 hours and 30.9 to 33.5 hours, respectively, and an accumulation of about 2.3-fold. Ponesimod caused a dose-dependent sustained decrease in total lymphocyte count, reversible within 7 days of discontinuation. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model enabled comparing day 1 and steady-state conditions. These results warrant further investigation of ponesimod in patients.