1
|
Merenda M, Earnest A, Ruseckaite R, Tse WC, Elder E, Hopper I, Ahern S. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in High-Risk Medical Device Registries: A Scoping Review. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2024; 6:ojae015. [PMID: 38650972 PMCID: PMC11033681 DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojae015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the methods and outcomes of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) use among high-risk medical device registries. The objective of this scoping review was to assess the utility and predictive ability of PROMs in high-risk medical device registries. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, APA PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for published literature. After searching, 4323 titles and abstracts were screened, and 262 full texts were assessed for their eligibility. Seventy-six papers from across orthopedic (n = 64), cardiac (n = 10), penile (n = 1), and hernia mesh (n = 1) device registries were identified. Studies predominantly used PROMs as an outcome measure when comparing cohorts or surgical approaches (n = 45) or to compare time points (n = 13) including pre- and postintervention. Fifteen papers considered the predictive ability of PROMs. Of these, 8 treated PROMs as an outcome, 5 treated PROMs as a risk factor through regression analysis, and 2 papers treated PROMs as both a risk factor and as an outcome. One paper described PROMs to study implant survival. To advance methods of PROM integration into clinical decision-making for medical devices, an understanding of their use in high-risk device registries is needed. This scoping review found that there is a paucity of studies using PROMs to predict long-term patient and clinical outcomes in high-risk medical device registries. Determination as to why PROMs are rarely used for predictive purposes in long-term data collection is needed if PROM data are to be considered suitable as real-world evidence for high-risk device regulatory purposes, as well as to support clinical decision-making. Level of Evidence 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Merenda
- Corresponding Author: Mrs Michelle Merenda, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Chen C, Li D, Yang Y, Xu J, Zhang L, Huo F, Guo W, Tang X. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in sacral tumour surgery and comprehensive description of a multidisciplinary program: a prospective study in a specialized hospital in China. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2024; 48:581-601. [PMID: 37966532 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06016-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There were fewer data to guide the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) theory into sacral tumour surgery. In the present study, we were aiming to describe a multidisciplinary program of ERAS and evaluate the availability in sacral tumour surgery. METHODS This was a prospective study of patients with sacral tumour between March 2021 and September 2021 at a single centre. We proposed a multidisciplinary program of ERAS for pre-admission, preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and post-discharge clinical care which positively influenced outcomes of patients with sacral tumour. All patients were prospectively assigned into two groups, ERAS group in which patients received ERAS protocols (n = 63), No-ERAS group in which patients had conventional clinical pathways (n = 62). Patient data were collected which included demographics, preoperative preparation, detailed information of surgical procedure, 60-day reoperation rate, 60-day readmission, postoperative length of stay (PLOS), time to first ambulation and flatus after surgery, time to removal of last drainage tube, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at first ambulation and discharge. Complications referred to ones that occurred within 60 days after surgery. The above parameters were compared between ERAS group and No-ERAS group. RESULTS Time to first ambulation after surgery in ERAS group (mean 20.9 h) was significantly shorter than that in No-ERAS group (mean 104.3 ho). Meanwhile, time to first flatus after surgery in ERAS group (mean 26.7 h) was also significantly shorter than that in No-ERAS group (mean 37.3 h). Patients in ERAS group had statistically shorter PLOS (10.7 days) as compared to that in No-ERAS group (13.8 days). In ERAS group, 19 of 63 patients (30.2%) were discharged within seven days after surgery as compared to seven of 62 patients (11.3%) in No-ERAS group. VAS score at first ambulation in ERAS group was not obviously higher than that in No-ERAS group though the time of first ambulation in ERAS group was statistically earlier than one in No-ERAS group. Furthermore, VAS score at discharge in ERAS group was significantly lower than that in No-ERAS group. The rate of postoperative incision necrosis was 6.3% (4/63) in ERAS group and 8.1% (5/62) in No-ERAS group and all of these nine patients underwent reoperation before discharge. The difference was not statistically significant in the wound complication of incision necrosis and 60-day reoperation rate. Only one readmission occurred in No-ERAS group due to the surgical site infection and also there was no significant difference of 60-day readmission rate between these two groups. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference of complications of femoral artery thrombosis and rectal rupture between ERAS group and No-ERAS group. CONCLUSIONS Our proposed ERAS pathway for sacral tumour surgery and early walking facilitate safe and prompt discharge. ERAS protocols of sacral tumour surgery could decrease PLOS without significantly increasing postoperative complications, 60-day readmission rate and 60-day reoperation rate. The application of ERAS pathway in the field of sacral tumour surgery should have personalized feature with regard to resection type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Dasen Li
- Peking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Junjun Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Fei Huo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Peking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Xiaodong Tang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pilares Ortega E, Colomina Morales J, Gómez Arbonés J, Drudis Morrell R, Torra Riera M. Determining factors on length of stay in primary total knee arthroplasty patients using enhanced recovery protocol after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2024:S1888-4415(24)00001-8. [PMID: 38184294 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an increase in degenerative arthropathies because of the increase in the longevity of world's population, making primary knee arthroplasties a procedure to recover quality of life without pain. There are factors associated with the length of hospital stay after this procedure. OBJECTIVE To determine the risk factors influencing the hospital stay during the postoperative period of patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty with an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (ERAS). METHODS A retrospective study is carried out on patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty at an University Hospital in the period 2017-2020 using the ERAS protocol, during which 957 surgeries were performed. RESULTS Average age of 71.7±8.2years, 62.4% were women and the 77.3% were classified as ASAII. The significantly associated factors to an increased length of stay are: age (P=.001), ASA scale (P=.04), day of surgery (P<.001), blood transfusion (P<.001), postoperative hemoglobin level at 48-72h (P<.001), the time of first postoperative mobilization to ambulate and climb stairs (P<.001), the need for analgesic rescues (P=.003), and the presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=.008). CONCLUSIONS There are statistically significant and clinically relevant factors associated with hospital stay. Determining these factors constitutes an advantage in hospital management, in the development of strategies to improve and optimize the quality of care and available health resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pilares Ortega
- Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Santa María, Lleida, España.
| | - J Colomina Morales
- Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Santa María, Lleida, España; Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación Clínica en Patología Musculoesquelética, Fragilidad y Tratamiento del Dolor, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Lleida, Lleida, España
| | | | - R Drudis Morrell
- Departamento de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Santa María, Lleida, España
| | - M Torra Riera
- Departamento de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Santa María, Lleida, España
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinsey D, Febrey S, Briscoe S, Kneale D, Thompson Coon J, Carrieri D, Lovegrove C, McGrath J, Hemsley A, Melendez-Torres GJ, Shaw L, Nunns M. Impact of interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital admission on quality-of-life following discharge: linked-evidence synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-164. [PMID: 38140881 DOI: 10.3310/ghty5117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To understand the impact of multicomponent interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital treatment, we conducted two systematic reviews, one of quantitative and one of qualitative evidence, and an overarching synthesis. These aimed to: • understand the effect of multicomponent interventions which aim to enhance recovery and/or reduce length of stay on patient-reported outcomes and health and social care utilisation • understand the experiences of patients, carers and staff involved in the delivery of interventions • understand how different aspects of the content and delivery of interventions may influence patient outcomes. Review methods We searched bibliographic databases including MEDLINE ALL, Embase and the Health Management Information Consortium, CENTRAL, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, conducted forward and backward citation searching and examined reference lists of topically similar qualitative reviews. Bibliographic database searches were completed in May/June 2021 and updated in April 2022. We sought primary research from high-income countries regarding hospital inpatients with a mean/median age of minimum 60 years, undergoing planned surgery. Patients experienced any multicomponent hospital-based intervention to reduce length of stay or improve recovery. Quantitative outcomes included length of stay and any patient-reported outcome or experience or service utilisation measure. Qualitative research focused on the experiences of patients, carers/family and staff of interventions received. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool or an adapted version of the Wallace checklist. We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesise quantitative data where appropriate, meta-ethnography for qualitative studies and qualitative comparative analysis for the overarching synthesis. Results Quantitative review: Included 125 papers. Forty-nine studies met criteria for further synthesis. Enhanced recovery protocols resulted in improvements to length of stay, without detriment to other outcomes, with minimal improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for patients admitted for lower-limb or colorectal surgery. Qualitative review: Included 43 papers, 35 of which were prioritised for synthesis. We identified six themes: 'Home as preferred environment for recovery', 'Feeling safe', 'Individualisation of structured programme', 'Taking responsibility', 'Essential care at home' and 'Outcomes'. Overarching synthesis: Intervention components which trigger successful interventions represent individualised approaches that allow patients to understand their treatment, ask questions and build supportive relationships and strategies to help patients monitor their progress and challenge themselves through early mobilisation. Discussion Interventions to reduce hospital length of stay for older adults following planned surgery are effective, without detriment to other patient outcomes. Findings highlight the need to reconsider how to evaluate patient recovery from the perspective of the patient. Trials did not routinely evaluate patient mid- to long-term outcomes. Furthermore, when they did evaluate patient outcomes, reporting is often incomplete or conducted using a narrow range of patient-reported outcome measures or limited through asking the wrong people the wrong questions, with lack of longer-term evaluation. Findings from the qualitative and overarching synthesis will inform policy-making regarding commissioning and delivering services to support patients, carers and families before, during and after planned admission to hospital. Study registration This trial is registered as PROSPERO registration number CRD42021230620. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 130576) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Kinsey
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Samantha Febrey
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Dylan Kneale
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Thompson Coon
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Daniele Carrieri
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Christopher Lovegrove
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Anthony Hemsley
- Department of Healthcare for Older People, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Liz Shaw
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Michael Nunns
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xu S, Liow MHL, Liu XE, Pang HN, Chia SL, Tay KJD, Yeo SJ, Chen JY. Enhanced recovery after day surgery total knee arthroplasty, the new standard of care: An Asian perspective. Knee 2023; 44:158-164. [PMID: 37672906 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study describes the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with day-surgery protocol to assess the outcome of ERAS day surgery TKA compared with traditional ERAS inpatient TKA in terms of length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS Patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were followed up. All TKAs were performed with the ERAS protocol. Patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria were offered day-surgery protocol: (1) ASA ≤ 3; (2) agreeable for discharge home. In addition, this day-surgery protocol comprised the following: (i) on-call physiotherapy review; (ii) home visit by physiotherapist at 1 week postoperative; (iii) home visit by nurse at 2 weeks postoperative. Day surgery was defined as discharge within 24 h. Patients were followed up for 6 months and PROMs, postoperative complications, and re-admissions recorded. RESULTS A total of 738 patients were included (342 ERAS day surgery, 396 ERAS inpatient). 92.4% of patients in the day-surgery group were successfully discharged within 24 h, leading to a shorter mean LOS of 1.13 days compared with 4.12 days in the inpatient group (P < 0.005). Both groups achieved significant and comparable improvement in Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental component of Short Form-36. Both groups had similar rate of 30-day readmission and complications. CONCLUSION Patients who underwent ERAS day surgery TKA achieved similar functional and quality of life improvement compared with ERAS inpatient TKA with no increased complication rate. ERAS day surgery TKA is safe and cost effective, and its use should be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| | | | - Xuan Eric Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Hee-Nee Pang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Shi-Lu Chia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Seng Jin Yeo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paladini A, Rawal N, Coca Martinez M, Trifa M, Montero A, Pergolizzi J, Pasqualucci A, Narvaez Tamayo MA, Varrassi G, De Leon Casasola O. Advances in the Management of Acute Postsurgical Pain: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e42974. [PMID: 37671225 PMCID: PMC10475855 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the millions of surgeries performed every year around the world, postoperative pain remains prevalent and is often addressed with inadequate or suboptimal treatments. Chronic postsurgical pain is surprisingly prevalent, and its rate varies with the type of surgery, as well as with certain patient characteristics. Thus, better clinical training is needed as well as patient education. As pain can be caused by more than one mechanism, multimodal or balanced postsurgical analgesia is appropriate. Pharmacological agents such as opioid and nonopioid pain relievers, as well as adjuvants and nonpharmacologic approaches, can be combined to provide better and opioid-sparing pain relief. Many specialty societies have guidelines for postoperative pain management that emphasize multimodal postoperative analgesia. These guidelines are particularly helpful when dealing with special populations such as pregnant patients or infants and children. Pediatric pain control, in particular, can be challenging as patients may be unable to communicate their pain levels. A variety of validated assessment tools are available for diagnosis. Related to therapy, most guidelines agree on the fact that codeine should be used with extreme caution in pediatric patients as some may be "rapid metabolizers" and its use may be life-threatening. Prehabilitation is a preoperative approach that prepares patients in advance of elective surgery with conditioning exercises and other interventions to optimize their health. Prehabilitation may have aerobic, strength-training, nutritional, and counseling components. Logistical considerations and degree of patient adherence represent barriers to effective prehabilitation programs. Notwithstanding all this, acute postoperative pain represents a clinical challenge that has not yet been well addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Paladini
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rawal N. Intrathecal Opioids In The Management Of Postoperative Pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
8
|
Sabah SA, Knight R, Alvand A, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Early patient-reported outcomes from primary hip and knee arthroplasty have improved over the past seven years : an analysis of the NHS PROMs dataset. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:687-695. [PMID: 35638211 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b6.bjj-2021-1577.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been useful to quantify and quality-assess provision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the UK for the past decade. This study aimed to explore whether the outcome following primary THA and TKA had improved over the past seven years. METHODS Secondary data analysis of 277,430 primary THAs and 308,007 primary TKAs from the NHS PROMs programme was undertaken. Outcome measures were: postoperative Oxford Hip/Knee Score (OHS/OKS); proportion of patients achieving a clinically important improvement in joint function (responders); quality of life; patient satisfaction; perceived success; and complication rates. Outcome measures were compared based on year of surgery using multiple linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS For primary THA, multiple linear regression modelling found that more recent year of surgery was associated with higher postoperative OHS (unstandardized coefficient (B) 0.15 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.17); p < 0.001) and higher EuroQol five-dimension index (EQ-5D) utility (B 0.002 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.002); p < 0.001). The odds of being a responder (odds ratio (OR) 1.02 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.03); p < 0.001) and patient satisfaction (OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.03); p < 0.001) increased with year of surgery, while the odds of any complication reduced (OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.98); p < 0.001). No trend was found for perceived success (p = 0.555). For primary TKA, multiple linear regression modelling found that more recent year of surgery was associated with higher postoperative OKS (B 0.21 points (95% CI 0.19 to 0.22); p < 0.001) and higher EQ-5D utility (B 0.002 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.003); p < 0.001). The odds of being a responder (OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.04); p < 0.001), perceived success (OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.02); p < 0.001), and patient satisfaction (OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.02); p < 0.001) all increased with year of surgery, while the odds of any complication reduced (OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.97); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Nearly all patient-reported outcomes following primary THA/TKA improved by a small amount over the past seven years. Due to the high proportion of patients achieving good outcomes, PROMs following THA and TKA may need to focus on better discrimination of patients achieving high scores to be able to continue to measure improvement in outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):687-695.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiraz A Sabah
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Knight
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Abtin Alvand
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
[Results and lessons learned in fast-track arthroplasty]. DER ORTHOPADE 2022; 51:374-379. [PMID: 35412086 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04245-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fast-track concepts in arthroplasty are understood as programs to optimize and homogenize perioperative procedures. With few exceptions, the literature reports a reduction in hospitalization time, a decrease in mortality and complications, earlier mobilization, and increased patient satisfaction through fast-track programs. IMPLEMENTATION The implementation of a fast-track concept requires the involvement and motivation of the entire treatment team, as the implementation of only individual components of a fast-track program does not lead to the desired goal. Country-specific regulations must be taken into account when evaluating fast-track programs. In particular, long-term results are also lacking. OUTLOOK For Germany, a scientific review is still pending. Modified perioperative measures but also a shortening of an inpatient stay must not reduce the currently existing high quality of care in arthroplasty. A possible reduction in the length of inpatient stay implies a compression, but not necessarily a reduction in the perioperative care required for a patient. For this reason, the surrounding conditions must also be created at a political level in the future to enable the achievement of the desired high quality.
Collapse
|
10
|
Choi YS, Kim TW, Chang MJ, Kang SB, Chang CB. Enhanced recovery after surgery for major orthopedic surgery: a narrative review. Knee Surg Relat Res 2022; 34:8. [PMID: 35193701 PMCID: PMC8864772 DOI: 10.1186/s43019-022-00137-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With increasing interest in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), the literature on ERAS in orthopedic surgery is also rapidly accumulating. This review article aims to (1) summarize the components of the ERAS protocol applied to orthopedic surgery, (2) evaluate the outcomes of ERAS in orthopedic surgery, and (3) suggest practical strategies to implement the ERAS protocol successfully. Main body Overall, 17 components constituting the highly recommended ERAS protocol in orthopedic surgery were identified. In the preadmission period, preadmission counseling and the optimization of medical conditions were identified. In the preoperative period, avoidance of prolonged fasting, multimodal analgesia, and prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting were identified. During the intraoperative period, anesthetic protocols, prevention of hypothermia, and fluid management, urinary catheterization, antimicrobial prophylaxis, blood conservation, local infiltration analgesia and local nerve block, and surgical factors were identified. In the postoperative period, early oral nutrition, thromboembolism prophylaxis, early mobilization, and discharge planning were identified. ERAS in orthopedic surgery reduced postoperative complications, hospital stay, and cost, and improved the patient outcomes and satisfaction with accelerated recovery. For successful implementation of the ERAS protocol, various strategies including the standardization of care system, multidisciplinary communication and collaboration, ERAS education, and continuous audit system are necessary. Conclusion The ERAS pathway enhanced patient recovery with a shortened length of stay, reduced postoperative complications, and improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. However, despite the significant progress in ERAS implementation in recent years, it has mainly focused on major surgeries such as arthroplasty. Therefore, further efforts to apply, audit, and optimize ERAS in various orthopedic surgeries are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Seong Choi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae Woo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Moon Jong Chang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Baik Kang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea
| | - Chong Bum Chang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. .,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thompson JW, Haddad FS. Integrated care systems in trauma to elective care: Can we emulate the integration of services in orthopaedic trauma care within elective practice? Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:411-413. [PMID: 34157862 PMCID: PMC8244793 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.26.bjo-2021-0113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua W Thompson
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fares S Haddad
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, London, UK.,The Bone & Joint Journal, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dong S, Zhao Y, Li JJ, Xing D. Global Research Trends in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study. Indian J Orthop 2021; 55:1335-1347. [PMID: 34824733 PMCID: PMC8586134 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00390-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a longstanding area of research interest in orthopedics due to its increasing global demand and associated technical challenges. The present study aims to analyze and present the current state of research and trends in this active field. METHODS Articles on revision TKA published from inception to 2018 were retrieved from Web of Science. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using the metadata of the included articles. Visualized analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software to reveal global trends in revision TKA research, through analyses of bibliographic coupling, co-authorship, co-citation and co-occurrence. RESULTS A total of 6027 articles were included. The number of publications and relative research interest in the field of revision TKA displayed strong upward growth over the time period examined. The USA had the highest number of citations for publications in this field, as well as the highest H-index. Studies in the field could be categorized into five clusters: prosthesis design, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, risk factors for revision TKA, and survivorship of implants. Studies focused on infection and risk factors for revision TKA are likely to become the most popular research topics in the field. CONCLUSION Global trends over the past few years suggest that the field of revision TKA research will continue to grow and lead to increasing rates of publication output over the coming years. Future developments in the field will likely include more preventative and etiological studies relating to revision TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengjie Dong
- grid.452944.a0000 0004 7641 244XDepartment of Osteoarthropathy, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, Shandong China
| | - Yu Zhao
- grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Arthritis Clinic & Research Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100044 China ,grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Arthritis Institute, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiao Jiao Li
- grid.117476.20000 0004 1936 7611School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Dan Xing
- grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Arthritis Clinic & Research Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100044 China ,grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Arthritis Institute, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bonakdari H, Pelletier JP, Martel-Pelletier J. A continuous data driven translational model to evaluate effectiveness of population-level health interventions: case study, smoking ban in public places on hospital admissions for acute coronary events. J Transl Med 2020; 18:466. [PMID: 33298067 PMCID: PMC7724897 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02628-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An important task in developing accurate public health intervention evaluation methods based on historical interrupted time series (ITS) records is to determine the exact lag time between pre- and post-intervention. We propose a novel continuous transitional data-driven hybrid methodology using a non-linear approach based on a combination of stochastic and artificial intelligence methods that facilitate the evaluation of ITS data without knowledge of lag time. Understanding the influence of implemented intervention on outcome(s) is imperative for decision makers in order to manage health systems accurately and in a timely manner. METHODS To validate a developed hybrid model, we used, as an example, a published dataset based on a real health problem on the effects of the Italian smoking ban in public spaces on hospital admissions for acute coronary events. We employed a continuous methodology based on data preprocessing to identify linear and nonlinear components in which autoregressive moving average and generalized structure group method of data handling were combined to model stochastic and nonlinear components of ITS. We analyzed the rate of admission for acute coronary events from January 2002 to November 2006 using this new data-driven hybrid methodology that allowed for long-term outcome prediction. RESULTS Our results showed the Pearson correlation coefficient of the proposed combined transitional data-driven model exhibited an average of 17.74% enhancement from the single stochastic model and 2.05% from the nonlinear model. In addition, data demonstrated that the developed model improved the mean absolute percentage error and correlation coefficient values for which 2.77% and 0.89 were found compared to 4.02% and 0.76, respectively. Importantly, this model does not use any predefined lag time between pre- and post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS Most of the previous studies employed the linear regression and considered a lag time to interpret the impact of intervention on public health outcome. The proposed hybrid methodology improved ITS prediction from conventional methods and could be used as a reliable alternative in public health intervention evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Bonakdari
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), 900 Saint-Denis Street, R11.412, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Department of Soil and Agri-Food Engineering, Laval University, 2425 rue de l'Agriculture, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Pelletier
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), 900 Saint-Denis Street, R11.412, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Johanne Martel-Pelletier
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), 900 Saint-Denis Street, R11.412, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Improvement in fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study of 36,935 procedures from 2010 to 2017. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21233. [PMID: 33277508 PMCID: PMC7718264 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77127-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
“Fast-track” protocols has improved surgical care with a reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) in total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the effects of continuous refinement of perioperative care lack detailed assessment. We studied time-related changes in LOS and morbidity after THA and TKA within a collaboration with continuous scientific refinement of perioperative care. Prospective multicentre consecutive cohort study between 2010 and 2017 from nine high-volume orthopaedic centres with established fast-track THA and TKA protocols. Prospective collection of comorbidities and complete 90-day follow-up from the Danish National Patient Registry and medical records. Of 36,935 procedures median age was 69 [62 to 75] years and 58% women. LOS declined from three [two to three] days in 2010 to one [one to two] day in 2017. LOS > 4 days due to “medical” or “surgical” complications, and “with no recorded morbidity” declined from 4.4 to 2.7%, 1.5 to 0.6%, and 3.8 to 1.3%, respectively. 90-days readmission rate declined from 8.6 to 7.7%. Our multicentre study in a socialized healthcare setting was associated with a continuous reduction in LOS and morbidity after THA and TKA.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Introduction The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in arthroplasty surgery has led to a reduction in postoperative length of stay in recent years. Patients with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) add to the burden of a strained NHS. Our aim was to identify the main reasons. Methods A PLOS was arbitrarily defined as an inpatient hospital stay of four days or longer from admission date. A total of 2,000 consecutive arthroplasty patients between September 2017 and July 2018 were reviewed. Of these, 1,878 patients were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Notes for 524 PLOS patients were audited to determine predominant reasons for PLOS. Results The mean total length of stay was 4 days (1 to 42). The top three reasons for PLOS were social services, day-before-surgery admission, and slow to mobilize. Social services accounted for 1,224 excess bed days, almost half (49.2%, 1,224/2,489) of the sum of excess bed days. Conclusion A preadmission discharge plan, plus day of surgery admission and mobilization on the day of surgery, would have the potential to significantly reduce length of stay without compromising patient care. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:488–493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hean Wu Kang
- Primary Joint Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Leeann Bryce
- Primary Joint Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Owen Diamond
- Primary Joint Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pritchard MG, Murphy J, Cheng L, Janarthanan R, Judge A, Leal J. Enhanced recovery following hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e032204. [PMID: 31948987 PMCID: PMC7044879 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways following total hip and knee arthroplasties. Secondary objectives were to report on quality of studies and identify research gaps for future work. DESIGN Systematic review of cost-utility analyses. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database and EconLit, January 2000 to August 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA English-language peer-reviewed cost-utility analyses of enhanced recovery pathways, or components of one, compared with usual care, in patients having total hip or knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extracted by three reviewers with disagreements resolved by a fourth. Study quality assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list, the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic decision models tools; for trial-based studies the Cochrane Collaboration's tool to assess risk of bias. No quantitative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS We identified 17 studies: five trial-based and 12 model-based studies. Two analyses evaluated entire enhanced recovery pathways and reported them to be cost-effective compared with usual care. Ten pathway components were more effective and cost-saving compared with usual care, three were cost-effective, and two were not cost-effective. We had concerns around risk of bias for all included studies, particularly regarding the short time horizon of the trials and lack of reporting of model validation. CONCLUSIONS Consistent results supported enhanced recovery pathways as a whole, prophylactic systemic antibiotics, antibiotic-impregnated cement and conventional ventilation for infection prevention. No other interventions were subject of more than one study. We found ample scope for future cost-effectiveness studies, particularly analyses of entire recovery pathways and comparison of incremental changes within pathways. A key limitation is that standard practices have changed over the period covered by the included studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017059473.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Pritchard
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jacqueline Murphy
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine - Barts and the London, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lok Cheng
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | - Roshni Janarthanan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Judge
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Judge A, Carr A, Price A, Garriga C, Cooper C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Old F, Peat G, Murphy J, Leal J, Barker K, Underdown L, Arden N, Gooberman-Hill R, Fitzpatrick R, Drew S, Pritchard MG. The impact of the enhanced recovery pathway and other factors on outcomes and costs following hip and knee replacement: routine data study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
There is limited evidence concerning the effectiveness of enhanced recovery programmes in hip and knee replacement surgery, particularly when applied nationwide across a health-care system.
Objectives
To determine the effect of hospital organisation, surgical factors and the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on patient outcomes and NHS costs of hip and knee replacement.
Design
(1) Statistical analysis of national linked data to explore geographical variations in patient outcomes of surgery. (2) A natural experimental study to determine clinical effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery. (3) A qualitative study to identify barriers to, and facilitators of, change. (4) Health economics analysis to establish NHS costs and cost-effectiveness.
Setting
Data from the National Joint Registry, linked to English Hospital Episode Statistics and patient-reported outcome measures in both the geographical variation and natural experiment studies, together with the economic evaluation. The ethnographic study took place in four hospitals in a region of England.
Participants
Qualitative study – 38 health professionals working in hip and knee replacement services in secondary care and 37 patients receiving hip or knee replacement.
Interventions
Natural experiment – implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery at each hospital between 2009 and 2011. Enhanced recovery after surgery is a complex intervention focusing on several areas of patients’ care pathways through surgery: preoperatively (patient is in best possible condition for surgery), perioperatively (patient has best possible management during and after operation) and postoperatively (patient experiences best rehabilitation).
Main outcome measures
Patient-reported pain and function (Oxford Hip Score/Oxford Knee Score); 6-month complications; length of stay; bed-day costs; and revision surgery within 5 years.
Results
Geographical study – there are potentially unwarranted variations in patient outcomes of hip and knee replacement surgery. This variation cannot be explained by differences in patients, case mix, surgical or hospital organisational factors. Qualitative – successful implementation depends on empowering patients to work towards their recovery, providing post-discharge support and promoting successful multidisciplinary team working. Care processes were negotiated between patients and health-care professionals. ‘Good care’ remains an aspiration, particularly in the post-discharge period. Natural experiment – length of stay has declined substantially, pain and function have improved, revision rates are in decline and complication rates remain stable. The introduction of a national enhanced recovery after surgery programme maintained improvement, but did not alter the rate of change already under way. Health economics – costs are high in the year of joint replacement and remain higher in the subsequent year after surgery. There is a strong economic incentive to identify ways of reducing revisions and complications following joint replacement. Published cost-effectiveness evidence supports enhanced recovery pathways as a whole.
Limitations
Short duration of follow-up data prior to enhanced recovery after surgery implementation and missing data, particularly for hospital organisation factors.
Conclusion
No evidence was found to show that enhanced recovery after surgery had a substantial impact on longer-term downwards trends in costs and length of stay. Trends of improving outcomes were seen across all age groups, in those with and without comorbidity, and had begun prior to the formal enhanced recovery after surgery roll-out. Reductions in length of stay have been achieved without adversely affecting patient outcomes, yet, substantial variation remains in outcomes between hospital trusts.
Future work
There is still work to be done to reduce and understand unwarranted variations in outcome between individual hospitals.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017059473.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Judge
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Price
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cesar Garriga
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- GREMPAL Research Group, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - George Peat
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jacqueline Murphy
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karen Barker
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lydia Underdown
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nigel Arden
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Rachael Gooberman-Hill
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Sarah Drew
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark G Pritchard
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Garriga C, Leal J, Sánchez-Santos MT, Arden N, Price A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Carr A, Rangan A, Cooper C, Peat G, Fitzpatrick R, Barker K, Judge A. Geographical Variation in Outcomes of Primary Hip and Knee Replacement. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1914325. [PMID: 31664449 PMCID: PMC6824227 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Little is known about variation in outcomes of surgery or about the factors associated with such variation. OBJECTIVES To evaluate variation in patient outcomes and costs for primary hip and knee replacement across health areas in England and to identify whether patient, surgical, or hospital factors are associated with such variation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used data from the National Joint Registry, linked to English Hospital Episode Statistics and Patient Reported Outcome Measures data sets, for 383 382 adult patients who underwent primary total hip replacement (THR) or primary total and unicompartmental knee replacement (TKR) surgical procedures from January 2014 to December 2016. Geographical Information Systems were used to display maps describing adjusted estimates of variation in outcomes across health areas. Data analysis took place from January 2018 to August 2019. EXPOSURES Patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, body mass index [BMI], and socioeconomic deprivation), surgical factors (eg, surgeon volume and grade), and hospital organizational factors (eg, number of operating theaters, number of specialist consultants, and hospital volume). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Length of stay (LOS), bed-day costs, change in Oxford hip or knee scores 6 months after surgery, and complications 6 months after surgery. RESULTS A total of 173 107 patients (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [10.7] years; mean [SD] BMI, 28.9 [5.2]) underwent primary THR and 210 275 patients (mean [SD] age 69.7 [9.4] years; mean [SD] BMI, 31.1 [5.5]) underwent primary TKR, nested in 207 health areas. A number of factors were associated with longer LOS, higher bed-day costs, smaller changes in Oxford hip or knee scores, and a higher percentage of complications, including a workforce with a higher number of less experienced physicians (eg, LOS for less experienced surgeons, THR: regression coefficient, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03; P < .001; TKR: regression coefficient, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.02; P < .001), public hospitals (eg, bed-day costs for private hospitals, THR: regression coefficient, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.14; P < .001; TKR: regression coefficient, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.19; P < .001), low volume of surgical procedures per surgeon (eg, change in Oxford hip or knee scores for lead surgeon with ≤10 vs >150 surgical procedures per year, THR: regression coefficient, -1.03; 95% CI, -1.47 to -0.58; P < .001; TKR: regression coefficient, -0.54; 95% CI, -1.01 to -0.06), and low volume of surgical procedures per hospital (eg, percentage of complications for hospitals with ≤200 vs ≥500 surgical procedures per year, THR: regression coefficient, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.21; P < .001; TKR: regression coefficient, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P = .03). Although these factors did not attenuate the magnitude of variation across health areas, they had ecological correlations with the observed geographical variations in outcomes of surgery by health area. For example, the percentage of public and private hospitals was ecologically correlated at the health area level with longer and shorter stays, respectively (public hospital, THR: ρ, 0.41; public hospital, TKR: ρ, 0.44; private hospital, THR: ρ, -0.37; private hospital, THR: ρ, -0.38). Across health areas, estimated mean length of stay ranged from 3 to 7 days, and associated bed-day costs ranged from £4727 ($5827) to £8800 ($10 848) for both total hip and knee replacement. The absolute estimated mean change in Oxford hip score varied from 18.7 to 24.6 points and, for Oxford knee score, from 13.1 to 18.8. Estimated 6-month complications ranged from 2.9% to 5.8% for both THR and TKR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, models indicated that higher surgical volume by surgeon and by hospital as well as private hospitals were associated with better patient outcomes, which could be explained by the changing case mix of public hospitals treating an increasing number of more complex patients. A higher proportion of less experienced physicians was associated with poorer outcomes. This variation was observed geographically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesar Garriga
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - José Leal
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maria T. Sánchez-Santos
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Arden
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Amar Rangan
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom
- National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - George Peat
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Raymond Fitzpatrick
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Barker
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Physiotherapy Research Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andy Judge
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|