The prevalence, incidence, and progression of radiographic thumb base osteoarthritis in a population-based cohort: the Rotterdam Study

Predicting Contralateral Surgery for Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis Within 5 Years

PURPOSE

Symptomatic trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint arthritis is a common cause of hand pain. It is unknown how many patients ultimately elect to have bilateral surgery for TMC arthritis. In this study, we assessed the frequency and predictive factors for contralateral TMC surgery in patients who underwent prior TMC surgery.

METHODS

We identified 712 patients who underwent primary surgery for TMC arthritis with a follow-up period of 5 years. We collected demographic, surgical, and follow-up data. Prediction models for contralateral surgery using a training and testing data set were created with multivariable logistic regression and random forest classifier algorithms.

RESULTS

At the time of initial surgery, 230 patients had bilateral thumb pain (32%), but only 153 patients ultimately had an operation for TMC arthritis on the contralateral side within 5 years (21% of 712 total patients and 67% of 230 patients with bilateral pain). Common predictive factors between both models for contralateral surgery were younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.98), bilateral thumb pain (OR = 3.76; 95% CI, 2.52-5.65), and anxiety disorders (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.11-3.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found that the rate of contralateral surgery was 21% in patients who underwent prior TMC surgery. Predictive factors for future contralateral surgery included younger age, bilateral thumb pain, and anxiety disorder at the time of initial surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Basal thumb arthritis surgery: complications and its management

The management of complications after surgery for basal thumb arthritis is sometimes challenging, and there are no clear recommendations on how to evaluate and manage patients with residual symptoms. The aim of the present article was to review the most common complications after surgery for basal thumb arthritis, with an emphasis on resection arthroplasty, joint replacement and joint fusion. In addition, possible management strategies for the different types of complications will be highlighted.

Effect of intraoperative hand-grip position on surgical outcome of thumb carpometacarpal arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

A variety of surgical techniques had been developed over the past few decades for treating thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) osteoarthritis (OA). However, there are currently no accepted consensus on the ideal treatment for thumb CMCJ OA. Arthrodesis was one of the widely popular treatment methods; however, studies have showed that non-union rates were as high as 50%, with higher complications such as osteoarthritis of neighbouring joints and higher revision surgeries required as compared to other surgical methods. Patients with arthrodesis were also reported to have decreased thumb range of motion and loss of opponens function. Currently, there are numerous intraoperative positioning techniques for arthrodesis which could be confusing for young surgeons. With recent developments of fixation plates and better understanding of the wrist anatomy, this retrospective review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our intraoperative hand-grip positioning method for arthrodesis of thumb CMCJ OA. What are the postoperative functional outcomes of (1) T-hook plates and (2) our intraoperative hand-grip positioning method for Eaton III thumb CMCJ OA arthrodesis by evaluating pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires (DASH), Mayo Wrist scores, capability of thumb opposition (Kapandji score), and comparing pre- and postoperative grip and pinch strength?

METHODS

Twenty patients with CMCJ OA underwent arthrodesis using our intraoperative hand-grip positioning method and T-hook plates and screws (Acumed, USA). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Radiologic assessment including fusion evaluation, evaluation of radial and palmar abduction angles was done on hand X-rays.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months were included in this study. 100% fusion rate was achieved with only 1 case of complication involving radial sensory nerve neuropathy which was resolved after removal of implant and neurolysis. Significant improvement in pain and Mayo Wrist scores were noted 3 months postoperatively, whilst DASH score exhibited significant improvements after 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). Even though there were no significant differences observed between preoperative and postoperative grip strength, pinch strength and Kapandji scores, positive recovery trends were noted for all parameters with these functions surpassing preoperative levels after 12 months of follow-up. Significant improvements on hand X-rays were also noted for both postoperative radial and palmar abduction angles.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no consensus on the ideal treatment method for thumb CMCJ OA. In this study, we would like to propose a simple intraoperative hand-grip positioning method with T-hook plates for arthrodesis. As seen from our results, our technique was able to provide satisfactory and replicable postoperative results and thus we would like to propose our hand-grip positioning method with T-hook plates fixation for subsequent treatment of patients with Eaton stage III thumb CMCJ OA.

Joint capsule innervation does not explain the difference in symptoms between scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

Peritrapezial osteoarthritis (OA) includes scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal OA. In clinical practice, scaphotrapezial OA seems better tolerated than trapeziometacarpal OA, with fewer complaints and better tolerance. The difference in pain could be linked to a difference in joint capsule innervation, perhaps with fewer nerve fibers in the scaphotrapezial than the trapeziometacarpal joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a histologic evaluation of these two joints to compare their respective innervation in 17 cadaveric specimens with peritrapezial OA. Radiographic scoring confirmed the presence of peritrapezial OA. Mean Kellgren-Lawrence score was 2.2 ± 1.1 in the trapeziometacarpal joint and 1.5 ± 0.7 in the scaphotrapezial joint (p = 0.08).

RESULTS

There was no difference between scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal joints in number of neurofilaments: 5.2 ± 3.9 and 4.4 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.20). A significant difference was found in S100 staining (myelinated structures), with a higher rate in the scaphotrapezial joint: 11.8 ± 7.5 vs 6.6 ± 5.2 (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that lower tolerance of trapeziometacarpal OA is not due to a difference in joint capsule innervation. On the contrary, we found a higher rate of myelinated tissues in the scaphotrapezial joint. These results suggested other pain pathways to explain clinical observations.

Total joint arthroplasty versus trapeziectomy in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of this double anonymized, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether total joint arthroplasty has superior outcomes than trapeziectomy 1 year after surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. A total of 62 women aged 40 years and older, scheduled for surgery for stage II or III osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint, were included and randomized to trapeziectomy or total joint arthroplasty. The primary outcome was the total score of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire subscale scores, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, active range of motion, strength, return to work, patient satisfaction and complications. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 and 12 months. At 1 year, we found no superiority of total joint arthroplasty over trapeziectomy regarding the total score of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. The total joint arthroplasty did show a significant advantage in strength and range of motion.Level of evidence: I.

Burden of osteoarthritis in the Netherlands: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of societal burden of osteoarthritis (OA) in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Medline (via Ovid) and Embase databases were searched in September 2022 for all publications providing prevalence/incidence, cost or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data of OA (all sites) in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight original studies were included in this scoping review; twelve reporting prevalence/incidence data of OA, seven reporting data on the economic burden of OA and twelve reporting HRQoL data of patients with OA. Most of the available data were from Dutch national cohorts. The prevalence of knee OA ranged from 6% to 18% across studies, from 4% to 7% for hip OA and from 12% to 56% for hand OA. OA was shown to be associated with impairment in work participation and long-term requirement of health care utilization, translating into substantial medical costs and societal costs of lost productivity. All studies comparing HRQoL among persons with OA with control persons showed a significantly lower HRQoL in patients with OA after adjustment for age, sex, and various risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

OA is a highly prevalent disease in the Dutch population and is responsible for a significant economic and health burden.