Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: rehabilitation

The osteoarthritis prevention study (TOPS) - A randomized controlled trial of diet and exercise to prevent Knee Osteoarthritis: Design and rationale

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA), the leading cause of disability among adults, has no cure and is associated with significant comorbidities. The premise of this randomized clinical trial is that, in a population at risk, a 48-month program of dietary weight loss and exercise will result in less incident structural knee OA compared to control.

Methods/design

The Osteoarthritis Prevention Study (TOPS) is a Phase III, assessor-blinded, 48-month, parallel 2 arm, multicenter randomized clinical trial designed to reduce the incidence of structural knee OA. The study objective is to assess the effects of a dietary weight loss, exercise, and weight-loss maintenance program in preventing the development of structural knee OA in females at risk for the disease. TOPS will recruit 1230 ambulatory, community dwelling females with obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ​≥ ​30 ​kg/m2) and aged ≥50 years with no radiographic (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤1) and no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of OA in the eligible knee, with no or infrequent knee pain. Incident structural knee OA (defined as tibiofemoral and/or patellofemoral OA on MRI) assessed at 48-months from intervention initiation using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include knee pain, 6-min walk distance, health-related quality of life, knee joint loading during gait, inflammatory biomarkers, and self-efficacy. Cost effectiveness and budgetary impact analyses will determine the value and affordability of this intervention.

Discussion

This study will assess the efficacy and cost effectiveness of a dietary weight loss, exercise, and weight-loss maintenance program designed to reduce incident knee OA.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05946044.

Neuropathic-like pain in knee osteoarthritis: exploring differences in knee loading and inflammation. A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

A subgroup of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) reports symptoms attributable to a neuropathic cause. Little to no attention has been invested on investigating differences in knee loading and inflammation in these patients.

AIM

To explore differences in inflammation and knee loading in patients with knee OA categorized based on the presence of neuropathic-like pain.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

POPULATION

Knee OA patients.

METHODS

cross-sectional analysis of data from 96 patients (mean age 64.18±7.11 years) with primary knee OA participating in a randomized controlled trial. Participants were divided into three groups (unlikely, possible and indication of neuropathic-like pain) according to the modified painDETECT questionnaire (mPDQ). Data on demographics, symptoms and physical function were obtained by questionnaires. Effusion/synovitis and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Knee loading variables (knee adduction moment [KAM], KAM impulse, and knee flexion moment [KFM]) were assessed by 3D-motion analysis. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), Chi-square test and curve analyses were used to analyze continuous, categorical and loading variables respectively. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors for neuropathic-like pain.

RESULTS

Patients with indication of neuropathic-like pain exhibited higher KAM impulse compared to those with no indication of neuropathic-like pain (standard mean difference (SMD): -0.036 Nm normalized to body weight and height per second, 95% CI: -0.071, -0.001) along with greater pain intensity (SMD: 3.87 units, 95% CI: 1.90, 5.84), stiffness (SMD: 1.34 units, 95% CI: 0.19, 2.48) and worse physical function (SMD: 13.98 units 95% CI: 7.52, 20.44). Curve analysis showed no significant differences in KFM and KAM between groups. Effusion/synovitis and BMLs did not differ significantly between groups. The best predictors for indication of neuropathic-like pain were KAM impulse, Hoffa and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee OA patients with indication of neuropathic-like pain exhibited higher dynamic medial loading, greater pain severity and worse physical function, while inflammatory markers were not significantly different across mPDQ groups. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to strengthen the evidence and establish mechanisms to explain associations between neuropathic-like pain and knee loading.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Knee loading is a modifiable factor and patients with neuropathic-like pain may benefit from offloading interventions.

CD146-positive adipose-derived stem cells subpopulation enriched by albumin magnetic sphere ameliorates knee osteoarthritis pain and promotes cartilage repair

BACKGROUND

The use of adipose stem cell (ADSCs) subpopulations in cartilage repair remains poorly characterized. In this study, we constructed an albumin magnetic sphere with specific targeting of CD146 (CD146-AMs) for sorting a subpopulation of CD146-positive ADSCs (CD146 + ADSCs) and explored the role of CD146 + ADSCs on joint pain and cartilage repair in rats with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

CD146-AMs were prepared and analyzed in materialistic characterization tests. Subpopulations of CD146 + ADSCs were sorted using CD146-AMs. Surface labeling, viability, and proliferation of a subpopulation of CD146 + ADSCs were evaluated in vitro. Molecular characterization of mRNA and protein expression profiles was analyzed by microarray. A rat KOA pain model was established by the iodoacetic acid method, and KOA pain and the promotion of cartilage repair were assessed after treatment with bilateral joint cavity injections of CD146 + ADSCs.

RESULTS

The CD146-AMs prepared in this study had an average particle size of 242.63 ± 6.74 nm, an average potential of 33.82 ± 3.53 mv, and high CD146 targeting and low cytotoxicity. The positive rate of enriched CD146 + ADSCs was 98.21% and showed a high level of stem cell marker expression and good cell viability. Gene and protein expression profiles showed that CD146 + ADSCs have different cellular functions, especially in regulating inflammation. In the KOA model, low, medium and high concentrations of CD146 + ADSCs were able to improve KOA pain and promote cartilage repair in a concentration-dependent trend.

CONCLUSIONS

The CD146-AMs prepared in this study were able to safely and efficiently sort out the CD146 + ADSCs subpopulation. The subpopulation of CD146 + ADSCs has a unique molecular profile that ameliorates KOA pain and repairs cartilage damage in rats, providing a new idea for KOA treatment.

Exerkines and osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent chronic joint disease, with physical exercise being a widely endorsed strategy in its management guidelines. Exerkines, defined as cytokines secreted in response to acute and chronic exercise, function through endocrine, paracrine, and/or autocrine pathways. Various tissue-specific exerkines, encompassing exercise-induced myokines (muscle), cardiokines (heart), and adipokines (adipose tissue), have been linked to exercise therapy in OA. Exerkines are derived from these kines, but unlike them, only kines regulated by exercise can be called exerkines. Some of these exerkines serve a therapeutic role in OA, such as irisin, metrnl, lactate, secreted frizzled-related protein (SFRP), neuregulin, and adiponectin. While others may exacerbate the condition, such as IL-6, IL-7, IL-15, IL-33, myostatin, fractalkine, follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1), visfatin, activin A, migration inhibitory factor (MIF), apelin and growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15. They exerts anti-/pro-apoptosis/pyroptosis/inflammation, chondrogenic differentiation and cell senescence effect in chondrocyte, synoviocyte and mesenchymal stem cell. The modulation of adipokine effects on diverse cell types within the intra-articular joint emerges as a promising avenue for future OA interventions. This paper reviews recent findings that underscore the significant role of tissue-specific exerkines in OA, delving into the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms involved.

Creaky knees: Is there a reason for concern? A qualitative study of the perspectives of people with knee crepitus

OBJECTIVE

Crepitus is a feature of osteoarthritis that may affect one's participation in exercise. An informed understanding is required of the perceptions that people have of their knee crepitus and how it affects their exercise behaviours. This study aims to investigate the role that crepitus may play in beliefs about exercise and knee health.

METHODS

Focus group and individual interviews were conducted online with participants who had knee crepitus. The transcripts were thematically analysed through an inductive approach.

RESULTS

Five main themes were identified from 24 participants: (1) individual variation of, (2) occurrence of, (3) meaning of knee crepitus, (4) attitudes and exercise behaviours regarding crepitus, and (5) knowledge deficits and needs concerning crepitus during exercise. The variety of crepitus sounds described occurred with a range of exercises or after inactivity. For those already with osteoarthritis or other symptoms, crepitus was of less concern than symptoms such as pain. Most participants had not ceased exercise but may have modified movement due to crepitus and associated symptoms; some had increased intentional strength training to try alleviating it. Participants agreed that more understanding about the processes causing crepitus and what exercise was safe for knee health would be beneficial.

CONCLUSION

Crepitus does not appear to be a major cause of concern for people who experience it. However, it is a factor that influences exercise behaviours as is pain. If health professionals could guide people with concerns about their crepitus, they may be more confident in exercising to benefit their joint health.

Current Non-surgical Management of Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic degenerative disease. The prevalence tends to increase with age and is influenced by underlying risk factors such as gender, obesity, joint injuries (work/sports activities), and geographic region. OA has a distinctive picture, namely, damage to the joint cartilage and the formation of new bone at the edges of the bones, also called osteophytes, due to biochemical, metabolic, physiological, and pathological changes in the joint cartilage and subchondral bone. Symptoms that can be caused include joint pain, inhibition of joint movement, crepitus, deformity, asymmetrical swelling of the joints, signs of inflammation, and changes in gait. Currently, there are various methods of managing OA in terms of reducing pain, including regeneration and non-regeneration therapy. Non-regeneration treatments include physiotherapy (exercise, biomechanical intervention, electrotherapy, diathermy), pharmacology, intra-articular injections (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, geniculate nerve blocks), extra-articular injections, and radiofrequency. In comparison, regeneration management includes laser and intra-articular injection (prolotherapy and PRP).

Rehabilitation interventions in osteoarthritis

The goals of the management of osteoarthritis (OA) are to relieve joint pain and stiffness, maintain or increase joint mobility and stability, improve activities and participation, and enhance quality of life. The first step in the management is to make a comprehensive holistic assessment to understand the impact of the disease on the individual. Then, an individualized management plan can be set via a shared-decision making process between the patient and the clinician taking into account all components of functioning affected by the disease. Rehabilitation interventions serve as the basis of OA management whereas pharmacological modalities are usually administered for additional symptom control. This study aimed to overview the rehabilitation interventions used for people with OA with an update of the recent evidence. First, core management approaches that include patient education, physical activity and exercises, and weight loss were addressed; then adjunctive treatments including biomechanical interventions (e.g. orthoses, assistive devices) and physical modalities were overviewed.

Diacerein versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common musculoskeletal condition affecting millions of people worldwide and posing a significant challenge to clinicians and researchers. Emerging evidence suggests that the multifaceted symptomatology of KOA may be alleviated by diacerein. With this in mind, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diacerein in patients with KOA.

METHODS

We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Database (WanFang), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) from their inception to August 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of diacerein intervention on patients with KOA. Two reviewers independently performed the selection of eligible studies and the extraction of relevant data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and R 4.1.3 software tools. Depending on the type of outcome indicator selected, summary measures were expressed as mean differences (MD), standardized mean differences (SMD), or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs with 1732 patients were included. The results revealed that diacerein had comparable efficacy to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in reducing pain indicators such as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.28], P = 0.34) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.65, 0.27], P = 0.42). However, diacerein outperformed NSAIDs in terms of global efficacy assessment by both patients and investigators (patients: 1.97, 95% CI [1.18, 3.29], P = 0.01; investigator: 2.18, 95% CI [0.99, 4.81], P = 0.05) at the end of treatment and sustained effectiveness in reducing WOMAC score and VAS score at four weeks after treatment. Moreover, there was no significant difference in adverse events incidence between the diacerein and NSAID groups. However, the GRADE evaluation indicated that the majority of the evidence quality was low.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that diacerein could potentially be considered as a pharmacological agent with significant efficacy for the treatment of patients suffering from KOA, offering a potential alternative treatment strategy for those patients contraindicated to NSAIDs. However, further high-quality studies with longer follow-up are needed to make more informed decisions about its efficacy in the treatment of KOA.

Perceptions of a machine learning-based lower-limb exercise training system among older adults with knee pain

Objective

To facilitate the older adults with knee pain to perform exercises and improve knee health, we proposed the design of a machine learning-based system for lower-limb exercise training that features three main components: video demonstration of exercises, real-time movement feedback, and tracking of exercise progress. At this early stage of design, we aimed to examine the perceptions of a paper-based prototype among older adults with knee pain and investigate the factors that may influence their perceptions of the system.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of the participants' (N = 94) perceptions of the system was conducted using a questionnaire, which assessed their perceived effects of the system, perceived ease of use of the system, attitude toward the system, and intention to use the system. Ordinal logistic regression was conducted to examine whether the participants' perceptions of the system were influenced by their demographic and clinical characteristics, physical activity level, and exercise experience.

Results

The participants' responses to the perception statements exhibited consensus agreement (≥ 75%). Age, gender, duration of knee pain, knee pain intensity, experience with exercise therapy, and experience with technology-supported exercise programs were significantly associated with the participants' perceptions of the system.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that the system appears promising for use by older adults to manage their knee pain. Therefore, it is needed to develop a computer-based system and further investigate its usability, acceptance, and clinical effectiveness.