Effect of precision error on T-scores and the diagnostic classification of bone status

Quantifying misdiagnosis rates from cross-calibration biases and precision errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the femoral neck

BACKGROUND

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an exam that measures areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and is regularly used to diagnose and monitor osteoporosis. Except for exam quality issues such as operator error, the quantitative results of an exam are not modified by a radiologist or other physician. DXA cross-calibration errors can shift diagnoses, conceivably leading to alternate intervention decisions and patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

After identifying and correcting a cross-calibration bias of 3.8% in our two DXA scanners' aBMD measurements, we investigated misdiagnosis rates for given cross-calibration errors in a single patient cohort to determine the impact on patient care and the value of cross-calibration quality control.

METHODS

The studied cohort was 8012 patients of all ages and sexes with femoral neck exams that were scanned on a single DXA unit from October 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021. There were six subcohorts delineated by age and sex, three female groups and three male groups. Data reporting focused on the highest risk subcohort of 2840 females aged 65 or older. The DXA unit had no calibration changes during that time. Only one femoral neck-left or right-was randomly chosen for analysis. Patients with multiple qualifying exams within the time interval had one exam randomly chosen. The proof-of-principle simulation shifted the aBMD values within a range of ±10%, ±8%, ±6%, ±4%, ±3.5%, ±3%, ±2.5%, ±2%, ±1.5%, ±1%, ±0.5%, and 0 (no shift); the cross-calibration shifts were informed by published results and institutional experience. Measurement precision was modeled by randomly sampling a Gaussian distribution characterized by the worst acceptable least significant change (LSC) of 6.9%, with 100 000 samplings for each patient. T-scores were recalculated from the shifted aBMD values, followed by reassigned diagnoses from the World Health Organization's T-score-based scheme.

RESULTS

The unshifted original subcohort of women aged 65 and older had 599 normal diagnoses (21.1% of the cohort), 1784 osteopenia diagnoses (62.8%), and 455 osteoporosis diagnoses (16.1%). Osteoporosis diagnosis rates were highly sensitive to aBMD shifts. At the extrema, a -10% aBMD shift led to +161% osteoporosis cases, and a +10% aBMD shift led to -64.5% osteoporosis cases. Within the more plausible ±4% aBMD error range, the osteoporosis diagnosis rate changed -10.5% per +1% aBMD shift as indicated by linear regression (R²  = 0.98). Except for the men aged 49 years and younger subcohort, the total cohort and five subcohorts had fit line slopes ranging between -9.7% and -12.1% with R² ≥ 0.98. Cross-calibration bias had greater influence for diagnosis count rates compared to measurement precision, that is, LSC.

CONCLUSIONS

These results quantify the degree of misdiagnosis that can occur in a clinically relevant cohort due to cross-calibration bias. In medical practices where patients may be scanned on more than one DXA unit, ensuring cross-calibration quality is a critical and high-value quality control task with direct impact on patient diagnosis and treatment course. The clinical impact and incidence of poor DXA quality control practices, and cross-calibration in particular, should be studied further.

Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients

To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1-L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was -2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is -1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤-2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis.

HR-pQCT Measures of Bone Microarchitecture Predict Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is a noninvasive imaging modality for assessing volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and microarchitecture of cancellous and cortical bone. The objective was to (1) assess fracture-associated differences in HR-pQCT bone parameters; and (2) to determine if HR-pQCT is sufficiently precise to reliably detect these differences in individuals. We systematically identified 40 studies that used HR-pQCT (39/40 used XtremeCT scanners) to assess 1291 to 3253 and 3389 to 10,687 individuals with and without fractures, respectively, ranging in age from 10.9 to 84.7 years with no comorbid conditions. Parameters describing radial and tibial bone density, microarchitecture, and strength were extracted and percentage differences between fracture and control subjects were estimated using a random effects meta-analysis. An additional meta-analysis of short-term in vivo reproducibility of bone parameters assessed by XtremeCT was conducted to determine whether fracture-associated differences exceeded the least significant change (LSC) required to discern measured differences from precision error. Radial and tibial HR-pQCT parameters, including failure load, were significantly altered in fracture subjects, with differences ranging from -2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.4 to -1.9) in radial cortical vBMD to -12.6% (95% CI -15.0 to -10.3) in radial trabecular vBMD. Fracture-associated differences reported by prospective studies were consistent with those from retrospective studies, indicating that HR-pQCT can predict incident fracture. Assessment of study quality, heterogeneity, and publication biases verified the validity of these findings. Finally, we demonstrated that fracture-associated deficits in total and trabecular vBMD and certain tibial cortical parameters can be reliably discerned from HR-pQCT-related precision error and can be used to detect fracture-associated differences in individual patients. Although differences in other HR-pQCT measures, including failure load, were significantly associated with fracture, improved reproducibility is needed to ensure reliable individual cross-sectional screening and longitudinal monitoring. In conclusion, our study supports the use of HR-pQCT in clinical fracture prediction. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS)

Methods now exist for analyzing previously taken clinical computed tomography (CT) scans to measure a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and a finite element analysis-derived femoral strength. We assessed the efficacy of this "biomechanical CT" (BCT) approach for identifying patients at high risk of incident hip fracture in a large clinical setting. Using a case-cohort design sampled from 111,694 women and men aged 65 or older who had a prior hip CT scan, a DXA within 3 years of the CT, and no prior hip fracture, we compared those with subsequent hip fracture (n = 1959) with randomly selected sex-stratified controls (n = 1979) and analyzed their CT scans blinded to all other data. We found that the age-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted hazard ratio (HR; per standard deviation) for femoral strength was significant before (women: HR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.5; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.7) and after adjusting also for the (lowest) hip BMD T-score by BCT (women: 2.1, 1.4-3.2; men: 2.7, 1.6-4.6). The hazard ratio for the hip BMD T-score was similar between BCT and DXA for both sexes (women: 2.1, 1.8-2.5 BCT versus 2.1, 1.7-2.5 DXA; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.8 BCT versus 2.5, 2.0-3.2 DXA) and was higher than for the (lowest) spine/hip BMD T-score by DXA (women: 1.6, 1.4-1.9; men: 2.1, 1.6-2.7). Compared with the latter as a clinical-practice reference and using both femoral strength and the hip BMD T-score from BCT, sensitivity for predicting hip fracture was higher for BCT (women: 0.66 versus 0.59; men: 0.56 versus 0.48), with comparable respective specificity (women: 0.66 versus 0.67; men: 0.76 versus 0.78). We conclude that BCT analysis of previously acquired routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans is at least as effective as DXA testing for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Pulse-echo ultrasound method for detection of post-menopausal women with osteoporotic BMD

We lack effective diagnostics of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. An ultrasound device was used to identify subjects in the osteoporotic range as defined by DXA. A case finding strategy combining ultrasound results with DXA measurements for patients with intermediate ultrasound results is presented.

INTRODUCTION

We lack effective screening and diagnostics of osteoporosis at primary health care. In this study, a pulse-echo ultrasound (US) method is investigated for osteoporosis screening.

METHODS

A total of 1091 Caucasian women (aged 50-80 years) were recruited for the study and measured with US in the tibia and radius. This method measures cortical thickness and provides an estimate of bone mineral density (BMD) and density index (DI). BMD assessment of the hip was available for 988 women. A total of 888 women had one or more risk factors for osteoporosis (OP _susp ), and 100 women were classified healthy. Previously determined thresholds for the DI were evaluated for assessment of efficacy of the technique to detect hip BMD at osteoporotic range (T-score at or below - 2.5).

RESULTS

In the OP _susp group, the application of thresholds for the DI showed that approximately 32% of the subjects would require an additional DXA measurement. The multi-site ultrasound (US) measurement-based DI showed 93.7% sensitivity and 81.6% specificity, whereas the corresponding values for single-site US measurement-based DI were 84.7 and 82.0%, respectively. The ultrasound measurements showed a high negative predictive value 97.7 to 99.2% in every age decade examined (ages 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The study data demonstrate that a strategy of combining ultrasound measurement with added DXA measurements in cases with intermediate ultrasound results (about 30%) can be useful for identifying subjects at risk for a low bone mineral density in the osteoporotic range.

Vertical ground reaction force during standing and walking: Are they related to bone mineral density left-right asymmetries?

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease that is characterized by reduced bone mass, deterioration of bone tissue and skeletal fragility. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether asymmetrical femur bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with asymmetrical gait and standing. We compared measures of gait and standing asymmetry in subjects with (n=38) and without (n=11) significant left-right differences in BMD. Participants walked for 72m at their comfortable speed and stood quietly for 60s while outfitted with pressure-sensitive insoles. Based on the pressure measurements, indices of standing and gait asymmetry were determined. Gait Asymmetry (GA) indices of maximum ground reaction force (GRF) and stance time were significantly higher in the asymmetrical BMD group, compared to the symmetrical group (p<0.03). During quiet standing, maximal GRF was twice as high in those with BMD asymmetry, compared to those without, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.10). These preliminary findings indicate that femur BMD asymmetry and gait asymmetry are interrelated in otherwise healthy adults. Nutrition, metabolism and lifestyle are known contributors to BMD; typically, they affect bone health symmetrically. We suggest, therefore, that the BMD asymmetry may be due to previous changes in the loading pattern during walking that might have led to asymmetric bone deterioration. Future larger scale and prospective studies are needed to identify the mechanisms underlying the relationship between standing, gait and BMD and to explore whether gait training and exercises that target gait symmetry might help to reduce BMD asymmetry.

Opportunistic Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Measurement at the Proximal Femur Using Routine Contrast-Enhanced Scans: Direct Comparison With DXA in 355 Adults

For patients undergoing routine contrast-enhanced CT examinations, an opportunity exists for concurrent osteoporosis screening without additional radiation exposure or patient time using proximal femur CT X-ray absorptiometry (CTXA). We investigated the effect of i.v. contrast enhancement on femoral neck CTXA T-score measurement compared with DXA. This cohort included 355 adults (277 female; mean age, 59.7 ± 13.3 years; range, 21 to 90 years) who underwent standard contrast-enhanced CT assessment at 120 kV_p over an 8-year interval, as well as DXA BMD assessment within 100 days of the CT study (mean 46 ± 30 days). Linear regression and a Bland-Altman plot were performed to compare DXA and CTXA results. CTXA diagnostic sensitivity and specificity was evaluated with DXA as the reference standard. There was good correlation between DXA and CTXA (r²  = 0.824 for both areal BMD and T-scores) and the SD of the distribution of residuals was 0.063 g/cm² or 0.45 T-score units. There was no trend in differences between the two measurements and a small bias was noted with DXA T-score +0.18 units higher than CTXA. CTXA had a sensitivity for discriminating normal from low bone mineral density of 94.9% (95% CI, 90.6% to 97.4%). For opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine post-contrast abdominopelvic CT scans, CTXA produces T-scores similar to DXA. Because femoral neck CTXA BMD measurement is now included in the WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) tool, this opportunistic method could help to increase osteoporosis screening because it can be applied regardless of the clinical indication for CT scanning. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Direct Comparison of Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT for Opportunistic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Implications for Osteoporosis Screening

OBJECTIVE

For patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT examinations that include the proximal femur, an opportunity exists for concurrent screening bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. We investigated the effect of IV contrast enhancement on CT-derived x-ray absorptiometry areal BMD measurement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our cohort included 410 adults (mean age, 65.3 ± 10.0 years; range, 49-95 years) who underwent split-bolus CT urography at 120 kVp. Areal femoral neck BMD in g/cm(2) was measured on both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT series with asynchronous phantom calibration. Constant offset and multiplicative factor corrections for the contrast-enhanced series were derived from the Bland-Altman plot linear regression slopes.

RESULTS

Mean unenhanced and contrast-enhanced areal femoral neck BMD values were 0.681 ± 0.118 and 0.713 ± 0.123 g/cm(2), respectively. The SD of the distribution of residuals for the constant offset and multiplicative model corrections were 0.0232 and 0.0231, respectively. The constant offset correction associated with contrast enhancement was 0.032 ± 0.023 g/cm(2), which corresponds to 0.29 ± 0.21 T-score units using the CT-derived x-ray absorptiometry young normal areal femoral neck BMD reference SD of 0.111 g/cm(2).

CONCLUSION

For the purposes of opportunistic osteoporosis screening, contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT studies are equivalent to unenhanced CT and can therefore be used for femoral neck BMD assessment. This measure could greatly enhance osteoporosis screening.

Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans

Central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur is the preferred method for bone mineral density (BMD) testing. Despite the fracture risk statistics, osteoporosis testing with DXA remains underused. However, BMD can also be assessed with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) that may be available when access to DXA is restricted. For patients undergoing a primary CT study of the abdomen or pelvis, a potential opportunity exists for concurrent BMD screening by QCT without the need for any additional imaging, radiation exposure, or patient time.

Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using Lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography

For patients undergoing screening computed tomography colonography (CTC), an opportunity exists for bone mineral density (BMD) screening without additional radiation exposure using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). This study investigated the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent QCT Computed Tomography X-Ray Absorptiometry (CTXA) analysis at the hip obtained using CTC examinations using a retrospective asynchronous calibration of patient scans. A cohort of 33 women, age 61.3 (10.6) yr (mean [standard deviation]), had routine CTC using various GE LightSpeed CT scanner models followed after 0-9 mo by a DXA hip BMD examination using a GE Lunar Prodigy machine. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and T-scores of the proximal femur were measured from either prone or supine CTC examinations using Mindways QCT Pro software following standard workflow except that the CT scanners were asynchronously calibrated by phantoms scanned retrospectively of the CTC examination without the subject present. CTXA and DXA aBMD were highly correlated (R2=0.907) with a linear relationship of DXA_BMD=1.297*CTXA_BMD+0.048. The standard error of estimate (SEE) on the linear fit was 0.053 g/cm2. CTXA and DXA T-scores showed a linear relationship of DXA_T-score=1.034*CTXA_T-score+0.3 and an SEE of 0.379 T-scores. CTXA and DXA aBMD and T-score measurements showed good correlation despite asynchronous scan acquisition and retrospective QCT calibration. The SEE of 0.053 g/cm2 is on par with the literature comparing Hologic and Lunar DXA devices. The observed relationship between CTXA and Lunar DXA aBMD matches predictions from published cross-calibrations relating CTXA to DXA aBMD measurement. Thus, opportunistic use of CTXA T-scores obtained at the time of CTC could enhance osteoporosis screening.

The effect of age on the changes in bone mineral density and osteoporosis detection rates in Han Chinese men over the age of 50

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between age and BMD at different skeletal sites and osteoporosis (OP) detection rates in Han Chinese men over 50 years and to assess the diagnostic value of the OSTA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1488 men over 50 was carried out and group comparisons were made.

RESULTS

BMDs at total hip and femoral neck decreased with age (p < 0.01) and were negatively correlated with age by liner correlation analysis (r = -0.36, -0.30; p all <0.05). The detection rates of OP and osteopenia were 10.08% and 43.21% respectively, which increased with age, and significantly higher among over 70 years old than under 70 individuals (47.75% versus 35.56%; 14.88% versus 1.99%; p all <0.01). The detection rate at the femoral neck was similar to the overall detection rate. Sensitivities of OSTA index at a cutoff value of -1 and -4 were 87.33% and 52.0% respectively, and the specificities were 56.20% and 87.59%.

CONCLUSION

BMDs at femoral neck and total hip decrease with age. Detection rates of OP increase with age. Bilateral femoral neck BMD measurement can improve detection rates of OP. OSTA is a useful screening tool for OP in Han Chinese men over 50 years.

Some physical and clinical factors influencing the measurement of precision error, least significant change, and bone mineral density in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard method of measuring bone mineral density (BMD) at highly trabecular bone, which can be statistically linked to the risk of fracture. For DXA, precision error (PE) and phantom-based accuracy studies are among the most important routine quality control procedures. A precision study was performed at our institution using International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines. Comparing our results with those reported by other investigators, we draw the following general conclusions: the PE was higher for the spine than the hip, which we attribute to the better geometric reproducibility at the hip. The hypothesis that the DXA calculates BMD relative to water was validated. Whether follow-up measurements are performed by the same technologist on the same day-or different technologists on subsequent days-does not appear to have a clinically significant impact on PE or least significant change (LSC). Mixing beam types (i.e., fan and pencil) may affect lumbar PE and LSC measurements more significantly than those of the hip. The use of a single technologist may reduce the PE for the lumbar spine but appears to increase it for the hip. Restricting the patient population to the female gender has the apparent effect of narrowing the gap between lumbar and hip PEs. Finally, the degree of BMD measurement accuracy can be affected by the type of phantom being used (e.g., European Spine Phantom vs Lunar phantom) and the faults in specific DXA edge detection algorithms.

The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) have an important role in the evaluation of individuals at risk of osteoporosis, and in helping clinicians advise patients about the appropriate use of anti-fracture treatment. Compared with alternative bone densitometry techniques, hip and spine DXA examinations have a number of advantages that include a consensus that BMD results can be interpreted using the World Health Organisation (WHO) T-score definition of osteoporosis, a proven ability to predict fracture risk, proven effectiveness at targeting anti-fracture therapies, and the ability to monitor response to treatment. This review discusses the evidence for these and other clinical aspects of DXA scanning, including its role in the new WHO algorithm for treating patients on the basis of their individual fracture risk.

Diagnostic agreement at the total hip using different DXA systems and the NHANES III database

In 1997, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) total hip reference database was adopted for T-score derivation in an effort to optimize diagnostic agreement among densitometers from different manufacturers. Our study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the NHANES III standardized database at achieving agreement in diagnostic classification (normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis) based on total hip T-scores comparing 2 different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems. This was a retrospective analysis of standard bilateral hip and lumbar spine scans done in duplicate for 60 women scanned on both a GE Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Delphi DXA system. Classification based on lumbar spine T-scores using manufacturer-specific databases was also compared as no standardized lumbar spine reference database exists. Subject's mean age was 62 yr (range: 47-83 yr). There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic classification between DXA systems (Prodigy vs Delphi), with agreement (same women classified same way) of 92% at the left total hip. Agreement was 100% when T-scores were greater than or equal to -0.8 and less than or equal to -1.2. There was 90% agreement between DXA systems at the lumbar spine. For both hip and spine, all diagnostic discrepancies occurred when the T-scores were at or near transition thresholds between normal and osteopenia or osteopenia and osteoporosis. The difference in mean T-scores between DXA systems at left total hip was 0.11 vs 0.32 for lumbar spine (p less than 0.001). Use of the NHANES III standardized database results in good diagnostic agreement at total hip between Prodigy and Delphi.