Trabecular Bone Score has Poor Association With pQCT Derived Trabecular Bone Density in Indian Children With Type 1 Diabetes and Healthy Controls

Trabecular bone score in adults with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with a disproportionately high fracture rate despite a minimal decrease in bone mineral density. Though trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measure of bone architecture, is lower in adults with T1DM, the modest difference is unlikely to account for the large excess risk and calls for further exploration.

INTRODUCTION

Fracture rates in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are disproportionately high compared to the modestly low bone mineral density (BMD). Distortion of bone microarchitecture compromises bone quality in T1DM and is indirectly measured by trabecular bone score (TBS). TBS could potentially be used as a screening tool for skeletal assessment; however, there are inconsistencies in the studies evaluating TBS in T1DM. We performed this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science resources (all-year time span) to identify studies relating to TBS in T1DM. Cross-sectional and retrospective studies in adults with T1DM were included. TBS and BMD data were extracted for pooled analysis. Fracture risk could not be analyzed as there were insufficient studies reporting it.

RESULT

Data from six studies were included (T1DM: n = 378 and controls: n = 286). Pooled analysis showed a significantly lower TBS [standardized mean difference (SMD) =  - 0.37, 95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.21; p < 0.00001] in T1DM compared to controls. There was no difference in the lumbar spine BMD (6 studies, SMD - 0.06, 95% CI - 0.22 to 0.09; p = 0.43) and total hip BMD (6 studies, SMD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.35 to 0.01; p = 0.06) in the case and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with T1DM have a lower TBS but similar total hip and lumbar spine BMD compared to controls. The risk attributable to the significant but limited difference in TBS falls short of explaining the large excess propensity to fragility fracture in adults with T1DM. Further studies on clarification of the mechanism and whether TBS is suited to screen for fracture risk in adults with T1DM are necessary.

Trabecular Bone Score in Assessing Bone Mineralization Status in Children with End- Stage Renal Disease: A Promising Tool

Areal-bone mineral density (aBMD) of lumbar-spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the most frequently used tool in evaluating BMD in pediatric patients, however its size dependency have significant impact on measurements accuracy in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of trabecular bone score (TBS) computed during lumbar-spine DXA scan in assessing bone status in children on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Ninety-three children on HD (aged 9-18 years) were subjected to lumbar-spine DXA-scan to obtain aBMD (g/cm2) and TBS.Z-scores of aBMD for chronological-age (aBMDZ-CA), height-age (aBMDZ-HA), and TBSZ-score were calculated using mean and SD values of 442 healthy controls. aBMD and TBS were significantly lower in short-for-age and normal height-for-age patients compared to the corresponding values of controls (p < 0.05 for all). Degraded vertebral microarchitecture (TBSZ-score < -2) was detected in 48% and 44% of male and female patients respectively. There were no significant differences in median TBSZ-score between short-for-age and normal height-for-age HD patients in male (p = 0.425) and in female (p = 0.316) patients. TBSZ-score correlated significantly with aBMDZ-CA (r = 0.234; p = 0.024) but not with aBMDZ-HA (r = 0.077; p = 0.462). Patients with history of fractures (5 patients only) had significantly lower TBS scores compared to those without fracture history (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

TBS is significantly reduced in children on maintenance HD and is associated with increased fracture incidence. TBS has shown to be a promising tool in assessing bone quality (trabecular microarchitecture) in children with CKD being not size-dependent as is a-BMD, for further evaluation of its potential role in therapeutic and follow-up decisions.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• In children with CKD, bone demineralization starts as early as CKD stage 2, so assessment of bone health is mandatory for follow up and therapeutic decisions. • aBMD of lumbar-spine DXA scan is the most used tool in evaluating BMD in pediatric patients, however its size dependency have significant impact on measurements made in children with CKD.

WHAT IS NEW

• TBS is significantly reduced in children on maintenance HD and associated with increased fracture incidence. • TBS has shown to be a promising tool in assessing bone quality (trabecular microarchitecture) in children with CKD being not size-dependent as is a-BMD.

Trabecular bone score in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

BACKGROUND

Bone fragility is a recognized complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Thus, lower trabecular bone score (TBS) measurements in T1D patients can be predicted. However, the results of current studies on TBS in patients with T1D are inconsistent. In this context, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that T1D is associated with lower TBS through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

An electronic search of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Web of science databases to identify studies related to TBS and T1D, supplemented by an additional manual check of the reference list of relevant original and review articles. All data was analyzed using a random effects model. Results were compared using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Review Manager 5.4 software and Stata 17.0 software were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Seven cross-sectional studies involving 848 participants were included. TBS was lower in T1D patients than in healthy controls on random effects analysis, with no heterogeneity (SMD =  - 0.39, 95% CI [- 0.53, - 0.24], P < 0.001; I2 = 0%). In addition, by subgroup analysis, T1D patients were strongly associated with reduced TBS in different regions and age groups, and the results were independent of covariate adjustment.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that TBS was lower in patients with T1D than in healthy individuals with normal blood glucose levels, suggesting that TBS may be a useful measure to assess fracture risk in T1D.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in healthy Brazilian children and adolescents: normative data

Childhood and adolescence are crucial periods for healthy bone development throughout life. This study aims to establish normative data for trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in healthy Brazilian children and adolescents.

PURPOSE

To establish normative data for trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in healthy Brazilian children and adolescents.

METHODS

Healthy children and adolescents, aged 5 to 19 years, underwent medical interview, physical examination with anthropometric measurement, pubertal stage evaluation, and bone densitometry by DXA (Hologic QDR 4500). Boys and girls were divided into 2 age groups: 5-9 years old (children) and 10-19 years old (adolescents). BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured following standard procedures. TBS measurements were performed using the TBS Insight ® v3.0.3.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 349 volunteers were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Reference values were defined for each group of children and adolescents divided into 3-year age groups. Girls had lower values of TBS compared to boys (1.356 ± 0.116 and 1.380 ± 0.086 respectively, p = 0.029). For both boys and girls, BMC and spine BMD measurements were significantly higher in adolescent than in children (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0001; p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, respectively). TBS range increased as pubertal development progressed. In both girls and boys, a 1-year increase in age was associated to a 0.013 increase in TBS. Body mass was a significant determinant for TBS. In girls, a 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated to an average TBS increase of 0.008.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reinforce the evidence that TBS varies according to age, sex, and pubertal stage in healthy children and adolescents. This study established reference values for TBS in healthy Brazilian children and adolescents which can be used as normative data for this population.

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Varies with Correction for Tissue Thickness Versus Body Mass Index: Implications When Using Pediatric Reference Norms

Trabecular bone score (TBS) derived from secondary analysis of lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans improves fracture prediction independent of bone mineral density (BMD) in adults. The utility of TBS to assess fracture risk in younger patients has not been established because pediatric norms have been lacking. Robust TBS reference data from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS) have been published. TBS values for the BMDCS study were derived using an algorithm that accounts for tissue thickness (TBS_TH ) rather than the commercially available algorithm that adjusts for body mass index (BMI; TBS_BMI ). We examined the magnitude of differences in TBS_TH and TBS_BMI in a cohort of 189 healthy youth. TBS values using both algorithms increased with age and pubertal development in a similar pattern. However, TBS_BMI values were systematically and significantly higher than TBS_TH (mean = 0.06, p < 0.0001). The difference between calculated TBS_BMI and TBS_TH was not uniform. Differences were greater at lower TBS values, in males, in older individuals, in those at later Tanner stages, and in those with a greater BMI Z-score. These systematic differences preclude the development of a simple formula to allow conversion of TBS_BMI to TBS_TH "equivalents." Because of these systematic differences in these two algorithms, using an individual's TBS_BMI to calculate a Z-score using the BMDCS TBS_TH reference values results in a falsely higher TBS Z-score (differences mean = 0.73, interquartile range [IQR] = 0.3 to 1.6). Until TBS_TH software for Hologic DXA equipment becomes commercially available, BMDCS TBS reference norms should not be used. © 2023 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Update on trabecular bone score

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an indirect and noninvasive measure of bone quality. A low TBS indicates degraded bone microarchitecture, predicts osteoporotic fracture, and is partially independent of clinical risk factors and bone mineral density (BMD). There is substantial evidence supporting the use of TBS to assess vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women, as well as to assess hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk in men aged > 50 years. TBS complements BMD information and can be used to adjust the FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment) score to improve risk stratification. While TBS should not be used to monitor antiresorptive therapy, it may be potentially useful for monitoring anabolic therapy. There is also a growing body of evidence indicating that TBS is particularly useful as an adjunct to BMD for fracture risk assessment in conditions associated with increased fracture risk, such as type-2 diabetes, chronic corticosteroid excess, and other conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. The interference of abdominal soft tissue thickness (STT) on TBS should also be considered when interpreting these findings because image noise can impact TBS evaluation. A new TBS software version based on an algorithm that accounts for STT rather than BMI seems to correct this technical limitation and is under development. In this paper, we review the current state of TBS, its technical aspects, and its evolving role in the assessment and management of several clinical conditions.

Impact of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Bone Health in Children

This paper gives an overview of the impact of type 1 diabetes on bone health in children and adolescents. Firstly, we analyse studies using dual X-ray absorptiometry to assess bone mineral content and bone mineral density. Then, we discuss modern, non-invasive techniques including peripheral quantitative computer tomography (pQCT) and high-resolution pQCT for the detailed assessment of bone health aspects including bone mass, bone geometry, bone microarchitecture, and bone strength. Thereafter, we explore some of the mechanisms that are responsible for diabetic bone disease in children, like low bone turnover and high sclerostin levels. Finally, we summarize some of the evidence for the importance of microvascular disease in the pathophysiology of diabetic bone disease.

Imaging techniques to study diabetic bone disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review article presents the most recent research on bone fragility in individuals with diabetes from a medical imaging perspective.

RECENT FINDINGS

The widespread availability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and trabecular bone score (TBS) software has led to recent assessments of bone fragility with this texture parameter in several studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), but in few of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Although most studies show a trend of reduced TBS values in T2D independent of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, some studies also show the limitations of TBS in both T2D and T1D. Given the limitations of DXA to assess bone strength and investigate the etiology of bone fragility in diabetes, more investigators are incorporating three-dimensional (3D) medical imaging techniques in their studies. Recent use of 3D medical imaging to assess bone fragility in the setting of diabetes has been mostly limited to a few cross-sectional studies predominantly incorporating high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Although HR-pQCT studies indicate higher tibial cortical porosity in subjects with T2D, results are inconsistent in T1D due to differences in study designs, sample sizes, and subject characteristics, among other factors. With respect to central CT, recent studies support a previous finding in the literature indicating femoral neck geometrical impairments in subjects with T2D and provide encouraging results for the incorporation of finite element analysis (FEA) to assess bone strength in studies of T2D. In the recent literature, there are no studies assessing bone fragility in T1D with QCT, and only two studies used pQCT reporting tibial and radial impairments in young women and children with T1D, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been recently used in diabetic studies of bone fragility.

SUMMARY

As bone fragility in diabetes is not explained by DXA-derived aBMD and given the limitations of cross-sectional studies, it is imperative to use 3D imaging techniques for longitudinal assessments of the density, quality, and microenvironment of bone to improve our understanding of the effects of diabetes on bone and reduce the risk of fracture in this large and vulnerable population of subjects with diabetes.

Prevalence of Vertebral Fractures in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: DenSiFy Study (Diabetes Spine Fractures)

CONTEXT

Vertebral fracture (VF) prevalence up to 24% has been reported among young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). If this high prevalence is confirmed, individuals with T1D could benefit from preventative VF screening.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the prevalence of VFs between adults with T1D and nondiabetic controls.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 127 adults with T1D, and 65 controls with a similar age, sex, and BMI distribution, from outpatient clinics of 2 tertiary care centers. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used for prevalent VFs. The modified algorithm-based qualitative (mABQ) method was applied. Bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) were assessed by DXA. Serum bone turnover markers and sclerostin were measured in a subgroup of participants.

RESULTS

Participants with T1D (70 women, 57 men) had a mean age of 42.8 ± 14.8 years, median diabetes duration of 25.8 (15.8-34.4) years, mean BMI of 26.6 ± 5.4 kg/m2 and mean HbA1c over the past 3 years of 7.5 ± 0.9%. Controls (35 women, 30 men) had mean age of 42.2 ± 15.9 years and mean BMI of 26.1 ± 5.1 kg/m2. VF prevalence was comparable between groups (2.4% vs 3.1%, P = 0.99). TBS, BMD at the total hip and femoral neck, and bone formation and resorption markers were lower while sclerostin levels were similar in participants with T1D vs controls.

CONCLUSION

Our VFA results using the mABQ method do not confirm increased prevalence of VFs in men and women with relatively well-controlled T1D.

Trabecular Bone Score Reference Values for Children and Adolescents According to Age, Sex, and Ancestry

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is used for fracture prediction in adults, but its utility in children is limited by absence of appropriate reference values. We aimed to develop reference ranges for TBS by age, sex, and population ancestry for youth ages 5 to 20 years. We also investigated the association between height, body mass index (BMI), and TBS, agreement between TBS and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) Z-scores, tracking of TBS Z-scores over time, and precision of TBS measurements. We performed secondary analysis of spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS), a mixed longitudinal cohort of healthy children (n = 2014) evaluated at five US centers. TBS was derived using a dedicated TBS algorithm accounting for tissue thickness rather than BMI. TBS increased only during ages corresponding to pubertal development with an earlier increase in females than males. There were no differences in TBS between African Americans and non-African Americans. We provide sex-specific TBS reference ranges and LMS values for calculation of TBS Z-scores by age and means and SD for calculation of Z-scores by pubertal stage. TBS Z-scores were positively associated with height Z-scores at some ages. TBS Z-scores explained only 27% and 17% of the variance of spine aBMD and BMAD Z-scores. Tracking of TBS Z-scores over 6 years was lower (r = 0.47) than for aBMD or BMAD Z-scores (r = 0.74 to 0.79), and precision error of TBS (2.87%) was greater than for aBMD (0.85%) and BMAD (1.22%). In sum, TBS Z-scores provide information distinct from spine aBMD and BMAD Z-scores. Our robust reference ranges for TBS in a well-characterized pediatric cohort and precision error estimates provide essential tools for clinical assessment using TBS and determination of its value in predicting bone fragility in childhood and adolescence. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Bone health in diabetes: Indian perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite estimated 77 million people having diabetes, bone health in Asian Indians with diabetes is largely unknown. This review summarizes the published literature on fracture risk and factors affecting it in Asian Indians with diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data on fracture prevalence in diabetes is limited; one study showed that diabetes was associated with a significantly higher number of fractures compared with subjects without diabetes (4% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.05). The prevalence of osteoporosis in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) varies from 35.5 to 49.5%. Studies have shown an increased, similar or lower areal bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and/or hip in patients with T2D compared to controls without diabetes. On the contrary, the BMD in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is modestly low compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls without diabetes. Recent studies have shown compromised mechanical, material and compositional properties of trabecular bone in Asian Indians with T2D suggesting deteriorated bone quality as one of the contributors of high fracture risk.

SUMMARY

Further research is needed to generate evidence-based guidelines to prevent and manage bone fragility in Asian Indians with diabetes.