Evaluation of weekend admission on the prevalence of hospital acquired conditions in patients receiving thoracolumbar fusions

Impact of Weekday on Short-term Surgical Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether weekday lumbar spine fusion surgery has an impact on surgical and inpatient physical therapy (PT) outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Timing of surgery has been implicated as a factor that may impact outcomes after spine surgery. Previous literature suggests that there may be an adverse effect to having surgery on the weekend.

METHODS

All patients ≥18 years who underwent primary lumbar spinal fusion from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were subdivided into an early subgroup (surgery between Monday and Wednesday) and a late subgroup (surgery between Thursday and Friday). Surgical outcome variables included inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year revisions. PT data from the first inpatient PT session included hours to PT session, AM-PAC Daily Activity or Basic Mobility scores, and total gait trial distance achieved.

RESULTS

Of the 1239 patients identified, 839 had surgery between Monday and Wednesday and 400 had surgery between Thursday and Friday. Patients in the later surgery subgroup were more likely to experience a nonsurgical neurologic complication (3.08% vs. 0.86%, P=0.008); however, there was no difference in total complications. Patients in the early surgery subgroup had their first inpatient PT session earlier than patients in the late subgroup (15.7 vs. 18.9 h, P<0.001). However, patients in the late subgroup achieved a farther total gait distance (98.2 vs. 75.4, P=0.011). Late surgery was a significant predictor of more hours of PT (est.=0.256, P=0.016) and longer length of stay (est.=2.277, P=0.001). There were no significant differences in readmission and revision rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo surgery later in the week may experience more nonsurgical neurologic complications, longer wait times for inpatient PT appointments, and longer lengths of stay. This analysis showed no adverse effect of later weekday surgery as it relates to total complications, readmissions, and reoperations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the influence of weekend admission on patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion by investigating hospital readmission outcomes and analyzing differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative factors.

METHODS

The 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify adult patients who underwent elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion. The sample was divided into weekday and weekend admission patients. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, and discharge status data were compiled. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission. Univariate logistic regression analyzed the relationship between weekday or weekend admission and 30- or 90-day readmission, and multivariate regression determined the impact of covariates.

RESULTS

177,847 patients were identified in total, with 176,842 in the weekday cohort and 1005 in the weekend cohort. Multivariate regression analysis found that 30-day readmissions were significantly greater for the weekend cohort after adjusting for sex, age, Medicare or Medicaid status, and comorbidity status (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.60-2.48; P < .001), and 90-day readmissions were also greater for the weekend cohort after adjustment (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.68-2.40, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery who are initially admitted on weekends are more likely to experience hospital readmission. These patients have increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis, postoperative infection, and non-routine discharge status. These factors are potential areas of focus for reducing the impact of the "weekend effect" and improving outcomes for elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Is there a weekend effect in spine surgery?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

The concept of a weekend effect is that patients admitted to hospitals on the weekend tend to have poorer outcomes compared to those admitted on a weekday. Whether there is a weekend effect among patients receiving spine surgery is not well described in the literature. We sought to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to explore whether a weekend effect exists among patients experiencing spinal surgery.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE electronic databases were searched for relevant articles. Meta-analyses were performed using functions available in the metafor package within the R software. We obtained adjusted odds ratios (OR) from included studies and pooled OR through an inverse variance method. A random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis and effect sizes were presented with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Our search strategy identified 316 references from electronic databases and eventually 6 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled result of 5 studies reporting overall complication rate indicated significant increased risk of complications among the weekend admission group (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.80). The pooled results of 3 studies demonstrated no difference in overall mortality rates between these 2 groups of patients (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.97).

CONCLUSIONS

In spinal surgical patients, the weekend effect significantly contributes to a higher complication rate. Knowledge of potential adverse events in patients admitted on weekends is necessary for spinal surgeons and caregivers to improve patient outcomes with spinal surgery.

Current Guidelines and Practice Recommendations to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Conditions After Major Orthopaedic Surgeries

»

In 2016, a total of 48,771 hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) were reported in U.S. hospitals. These incidents resulted in an excess cost of >$2 billion, which translates to roughly $40,000 per patient with an HAC.

»

Current guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism and surgical site infection consist primarily of antithrombotic prophylaxis and antiseptic technique, respectively.

»

The prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI) and in-hospital falls and trauma is done best via education. In the case of CA-UTI, this consists of training staff about the indications for catheters and their timely removal when they are no longer necessary, and in the case of in-hospital falls and trauma, advising the patient and family about the patient's fall risk and communicating the fall risk to the health-care team.

»

Blood incompatibility is best prevented by implementation of a pretransfusion testing protocol. Pressure ulcers can be prevented via patient positioning, especially during surgery, and via postoperative skin checks.

Influence of Admission Time on Health Care Quality and Utilization in Patients with Stroke: Analysis for a Possible July Effect and Weekend Effect

(1) Purpose: Undesirable health care outcomes could conceivably increase as a result of the entry of new, less experienced health care personnel into patient care during the month of July (the July effect) or as a result of the less balanced allocation of health care resources on weekends (the weekend effect). Whether these two effects were present in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) system was investigated. (2) Methods: The current study data were acquired from the NHI Research Database. The research sample comprised ≥18-year-old patients diagnosed as having a stroke for the first time from 1 January 2006 to 30 September 2012. The mortality rate within 30 days after hospitalization and readmission rate within 14 days after hospital discharge were used as health care quality indicators, whereas health care utilization indicators were the total length and cost of initial hospitalization. (3) Results: The results revealed no sample-wide July effect with regard to the four indicators among patients with stroke. However, an unexpected July effect was present among in-patients in regional and public hospitals, in which the total lengths and costs of initial hospitalization for non-July admissions were higher than those for July admissions. Furthermore, the total hospitalization length for weekend admissions was 1.06–1.07 times higher than that for non-weekend admissions; the total hospitalization length for weekend admissions was also higher than that for weekday admissions during non-July months. Thus, weekend admission did not affect the health care quality of patients with stroke but extended their total hospitalization length. (4) Conclusions: Consistent with the NHI’s general effectiveness in ensuring fair, universally accessible, and high-quality health care services in Taiwan, the health care quality of patients examined in this study did not vary significantly overall between July and non-July months. However, a longer hospitalization length was observed for weekend admissions, possibly due to limitations in personnel and resource allocations during weekends. These results highlight the health care efficiency of hospitals during weekends as an area for further improvement.

Risk Factors for Cerebral Vasospasm in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Population-Based Study of 8346 Patients

BACKGROUND

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that there was a lack of consensus regarding risk factors for cerebral vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with increased likelihood of cerebral vasospasm after aSAH using the largest, all-payer, inpatient database in the United States.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016) was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes to identify patients (age ≥18 years) treated (coiling or clipping) for aSAH. Exposure variables included demographics, comorbidities, location and clinical grade of aSAH, treatment type, and laboratory anomalies. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify factors independently associated with cerebral vasospasm (ICD-10 code I67.84).

RESULTS

The rate of vasospasm was 28.1% in 8346 patients with treated aSAH. In multivariable analysis, vasospasm risk was inversely proportional to age (P < 0.001). Substance abuse, particularly tobacco smoking and cocaine, was associated with vasospasm (P < 0.05). Advanced SAH severity (Hunt and Hess grade ≥2) approximately doubled risk of vasospasm (P < 0.001). Poor hemodynamic status, including anemia (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), hypovolemia (OR, 1.6), and hypotension (OR, 1.4), was correlated with vasospasm. Laboratory abnormalities, including leukocytosis (OR, 1.3), hyponatremia (OR, 1.4), and hypokalemia (OR, 1.3), were associated with vasospasm (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first nationwide analysis of cerebral vasospasm, risk factors included younger age, female sex, smoking history, hemodynamic compromise, and clinical severity of aSAH. Recently proposed biomarkers, including leukocytosis and hypokalemia, were supported by our findings. This study may assist risk stratification and earlier detection of vasospasm.

Occurrence of never events after total joint arthroplasty in the United States

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a major orthopedic procedure associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Never events (NEs) are harmful hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) that are preventable.

METHODS

Information on hospital admissions with TJA was collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2012. NIS was queried to identify NE applicable to TJA patients based on the HAC definition listed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). NEs were further compared before and after 2008 to evaluate the effect of the new CMS non-reimbursement policy on their incidence.

RESULTS

A total of 8,176,774 patients were admitted with TJA from 2003 to 2012. 108,668 patients of these (1.33%) had ≥ 1 NE. The most prevalent NE was fall and trauma (0.7%). Significant multivariable predictors with higher odds of developing at least one NE included weekend admission [odds ratio (99.9% CI), 4.3 (3.1, 5.8), p < 0.001] and weight loss [odds ratio (99.9% CI), 2.8 (2.2, 3.5), p < 0.001]. A temporal comparison of NE before and after 2008 revealed a decrease in total NE occurrence after 2008 when the CMS announced discontinuing payment for NE (1.39% vs. 1.25%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounding risk factors, NE after TJA was significantly associated with an increased mortality (p < 0.001), a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), and higher total hospitalization charges (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated that NE in TJA patients was predictive of an increased mortality, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. This study established baseline NE rates in the TJA patient population to use as benchmarks and identified target areas for quality improvement in US.

A Supervised Pattern Analysis of the Length of Stay for Hip Replacement Admissions

Hip replacement is the most common surgical procedure among Medicare patients in the US and worldwide. The hospital length of stay (LOS) for hip replacement admissions is therefore important to be controlled, contributing to savings for hospitals. This study combined medical claims and hospital structure and service data to examine LOS fluctuations and trends, and admission distribution patterns, during weekdays, for hip replacement cases. The study furthermore examined associations of these patterns with the LOS performance. Most hospitals were found to admit hip replacement cases at the start of the week (Monday through Wednesday). There is an upward LOS trend as we approach late weekday admissions. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that LOS weekday inconsistencies, a large proportion of hip replacement admissions on Thursday and Friday, the government ownership status, the bed size, and the critical access status are associated with an increased LOS. On the other hand, the rate of hip replacement admissions over total ones, and the hospital being accredited, are associated with a lower LOS. Findings stress out the need for hospitals to maintain an effective and balanced distribution of hip replacement admissions, evenly during the week, and the need for standardized case management, to avoid practice variability and, therefore, LOS fluctuations for their hip replacement cases.

Weekend versus Weekday Admission in Spinal Cord Injury and Its Effect on Timing of Surgical Intervention

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare timing of intervention for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) requiring surgical procedures during weekend versus weekday admissions.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify patients with SCI who underwent surgical treatment (decompression with or without stabilization) as an emergent/urgent procedure. Timing of intervention, inpatient morbidity, and inpatient mortality were compared between patients admitted during the weekend versus a weekday. Multiple logistic regression analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 9390 patients were identified (mean age 55 years, 73.2% male) from the database, with 34.1% admitted during the weekend and 65.9% during a weekday. The average day of intervention for the entire cohort was 2.8 (SD 3.9, interquartile range 1-4); day 2.7 (standard deviation [SD] 4.0) versus day 2.8 ([SD] 3.9) for patients admitted in a weekend versus weekday (P = 0.418). After controlling for patient age, sex, and injury severity score on multiple logistic regression analysis, weekend admission was not significantly associated with early intervention (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.21; P = 0.993), complication occurrence (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38; P = 0.476), or inpatient mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.44-1.56; P = 0.563). Patients with complete/American Spinal Injury Association A injuries were more likely to undergo early intervention (OR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.31-3.31; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In this national study, patients with SCI who were admitted during the weekend received surgical intervention as early as patients admitted during a weekday. Furthermore, no differences in complication or mortality rates between groups were found.

The Weekend Effect on Morbidity and Mortality Among Pediatric Epilepsy Admissions

BACKGROUND

Pediatric epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders with low mortality and high morbidity, often requiring hospitalization. Weekend admissions have been shown to be associated with worse outcomes compared with their weekday counterparts. To date, no study has assessed the impact of weekend admission on clinical and quality outcomes in the pediatric epilepsy population.

METHODS

Children with epilepsy were identified from the 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 Kids Inpatient Database. Quality outcomes were identified using the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services' hospital acquired conditions International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition; Clinical Modification (ICD-9CM) codes. Multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the association between weekend admission and inpatient mortality and hospital acquired condition occurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 526,765 pediatric epilepsy discharges were identified, with 80% occurring on weekdays and 20% on weekends. Overall, the hospital acquired condition rate was 3.6% (3.2% vs 5.2% for weekday versus weekend) and inpatient mortality was 1.5% (1.2% vs 1.7%). Patients admitted on the weekend had 28% higher rates of hospital acquired conditions and 21% higher inpatient mortality rates compared with their weekday counterparts. Patients seen at nonpediatric centers had 10% to 28% lower rates of mortality, but 5% to 13% higher hospital acquired condition rates than those at pediatric centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekend admission is significantly associated with worse clinical and quality outcomes compared with weekday admissions among pediatric epilepsy inpatients. Weekend admissions likely represent unplanned, at risk admissions, coupled with less staffing. Further study is needed to isolate clinical and systemic factors to decrease this disparity in this highly comorbid pediatric subgroup.

Potentially preventable complications in epilepsy admissions: The "weekend effect"

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States with frequent hospital admissions accounting for a significant burden on patients and society as a whole. Weekend admissions have generally been found to have poorer outcomes compared to weekday admissions with increased rates of preventable complications, such as nationally identified "hospital-acquired conditions" (HAC).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of weekend admission on HACs and mortality in the adult epilepsy population.

PARTICIPANTS

All adult patients with epilepsy hospitalized in the U.S. from 2000 to 2010 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

RESULTS

There were 12,997,181 admissions for epilepsy with 10,106,152 (78%) weekday, 2,891,019 (22%) weekend, and 10 (<0.1%) missing admissions. Weekend admissions saw a 10% increased likelihood of both HACs (RR=1.10, 95% CI:1.09, 1.11, p<0.01) and mortality (RR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.11, p<0.01) compared to weekday admissions. The occurrence of HAC was associated with higher inpatient charges (RR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.36, p<0.01), pLOS (RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.22, p<0.01), and higher mortality (RR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.14, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Prior studies have shown weekend admissions are usually associated with higher rates of complications leading to higher costs and a longer hospital stay. Likewise, weekend admissions for epilepsy were associated with increased rates of HACs and mortality; however, they were also negatively associated with LOS and total charge. Thus, weekend admissions for epilepsy should be considered high risk with greater effort made to mitigate these risks.