Clinical relevance of BRAF status in glial and glioneuronal tumors: A systematic review

Exploring a distinct FGFR2::DLG5 rearrangement in a low-grade neuroepithelial tumor: A case report and mini-review of protein fusions in brain tumors

We report the novel clinical presentation of a primary brain neoplasm in a 30-year-old man with a mass-like area in the anteromedial temporal lobe. Histopathological analysis revealed a low-grade neuroepithelial tumor with cytologically abnormal neurons and atypical glial cells within the cerebral cortex. Molecular analysis showed a previously undescribed FGFR2::DLG5 rearrangement. We discuss the clinical significance and molecular implications of this fusion event, shedding light on its potential impact on tumor development and patient prognosis. Additionally, an extensive review places the finding in this case in the context of protein fusions in brain tumors in general and highlights their diverse manifestations, underlying molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.

MRI characteristics predict BRAF V600E status in gangliogliomas and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and provide survival prognostication

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E mutation is a common genomic alteration in gangliogliomas (GGs) and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs) with prognostic and therapeutic implications.

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to predict BRAF V600E status in GGs and PXAs and their prognostic values.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cohort of 44 patients with histologically confirmed GGs and PXAs was reviewed retrospectively. BRAF V600E status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Demographics and MRI characteristics of the two groups were evaluated and compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify MRI features that were prognostic for progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

T1/FLAIR ratio, enhancing margin, and mean relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADCmea) value showed significant differences between the BRAF V600E-mutant and BRAF V600E-wild groups (all P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed only rADCmea value was the independent predictive factor for BRAF V600E status (P = 0.027). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed age at diagnosis (P = 0.032), WHO grade (P = 0.020), enhancing margin (P = 0.029), and rADCmea value (P = 0.005) were significant prognostic factors for PFS. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, increasing age (P = 0.040, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.079) and lower rADCmea values (P = 0.021, HR = 0.036, 95% CI = 0.002-0.602) were associated with poor PFS in GGs and PXAs.

CONCLUSION

Imaging features are potentially predictive of BRAF V600E status in GGs and PXAs. Furthermore, rADCmea value is a valuable prognostic factor for patients with GGs or PXAs.

Abnormal Schwannoma-like Growth of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive Glioblastoma in the Interior Acoustic Canal with Leptomeningeal Infiltration: a case report

Background

Glioblastoma belongs to the most common and most aggressive tumor entity of the central nervous system with a poor prognosis of only few months. Once manifested, it grows fast and diffusely by infiltrating the surrounding brain parenchyma. Despite its aggressive behavior, glioblastoma rarely presents with multiple lesions and metastasis to intra- and extracranial tissues. Therefore, metastasized, multiple glioblastoma is limited to case reports. Our case describes an atypical primary bilateral manifestation of BRAF V600E-positive epithelioid glioblastoma with rapid metastasis and meningeosis glioblastoma while under adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old Caucasian male patient presented with a seizure and numbness in his left arm. He was diagnosed with an abnormal primary bilateral manifestation of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type intracranial epithelioid glioblastoma with O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation (MGMT) at 12%. While being under the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide, the patient developed left-sided facial nerve weakness and hearing loss, dysarthria, and severe gait instability. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging showed that glioblastoma lesions advanced rapidly with a schwannoma-like growth pattern by invading the left internal acoustic meatus, adjacent cranial nerves, and leptomeninges. A lumbar puncture confirmed meningeosis glioblastoma. Four months after the initial diagnosis of glioblastoma, the patient died from the complications of the fast and diffuse metastasis.

Conclusions

Glioblastoma rarely presents with metastases despite its aggressive and rapidly growing nature. Our case should increase awareness of symptom tracking in patients with glioblastoma to intervene early and efficiently. Moreover, refractory therapies for glioblastoma should underline the importance of personalized medicine.

Targeted Therapy for BRAF Mutant Brain Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Molecular heterogeneity has confounded attempts to target individual pathways in brain tumors. However, gliomas with BRAF mutations have been identified as being uniquely vulnerable to targeted therapies. Such mutations are predominantly seen in brain tumors of the adolescent and young adult population. Given that accurate and timely identification of such mutations is essential for offering appropriate treatment, treatment centers should offer both immunohistochemical and sequencing methods for detection of these mutations to guide treatment. Additional studies of these tumors at recurrence would also allow identification of breakthrough resistance mechanisms that may also be targetable for treatment. Due to the relative rarity of these tumors, multicenter collaborative studies will be essential in achieving long term control of these tumors.

[Histomolecular diagnosis of glial and glioneuronal tumours]

While rare compared to extra-cranial neoplasms, glial and glioneuronal tumors are responsible of high morbidity and mortality. In 2016, the World Health Organization introduced histo-molecular ("integrated") diagnostics for central nervous system tumors based on morphology, immunohistochemistry and the presence of key genetic alterations. This combined phenotypic-genotypic classification allows for a more objective diagnostic of brain tumors. The implementation of such a classification in daily practice requires immunohistochemical surrogates to detect common genetic alterations and sometimes expensive and not widely available molecular biology techniques. The first step in brain tumor diagnostics is to inquire about the clinical picture and the imaging findings. When dealing with a glial tumor, the pathologist needs to assess its nature, infiltrative or circumscribed. If the tumor is infiltrative, IDH1/2 genes (prognostic marker) and chromosomes 1p/19q (diagnosis of oligodendroglioma) need to be assessed. If the tumor appears circumscribed, the pathologist should look for a neuronal component associated with the glial component (glioneuronal tumor). A limited immunohistochemistry panel will help distinguish between diffuse glioma (IDH1-R132H, ATRX, p53) and circumscribed glial/glioneuronal tumor (CD34, neuronal markers, BRAF-V600E), and some antibodies may reliably detect genetic alterations (IDH1-R132H, BRAF-V600E and H3-K27M mutations). Chromosomal imbalances (1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglioma; chromosome 7 gain/chromosome 10 loss and EGFR amplification in glioblastoma) and gene rearrangements (BRAF fusion, FGFR1 fusion) will be identified by molecular biology techniques. The up-coming edition of the WHO classification of the central nervous system tumors will rely more heavily on molecular alterations to accurately diagnose and treat brain tumors.

Adult pilocytic astrocytoma in the molecular era: a comprehensive review

Adult pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) is less prevalent than pediatric PA and is associated with a worse prognosis. In a literature review, we found that 88.3% of the molecular alterations in adult PA are associated with MAPK pathway dysregulation. The most common alterations are fusions of BRAF. Understanding of the mechanisms underlying this pathway has evolved substantially, heralding advancements in specific targeted therapy. Here, we review clinical and molecular features of adult PA, characteristics predicting aggressive behavior and approaches to standard and investigational therapies. We highlight epigenetic profiling and integrated diagnosis as an essential component of classifying PA.

Role of diffusion weighted imaging for differentiating cerebral pilocytic astrocytoma and ganglioglioma BRAF V600E-mutant from wild type

PURPOSE

BRAF V600E mutation is a distinctive genomic alteration of pediatric low-grade gliomas with prognostic and therapeutic implications. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to analyze imaging features of BRAF V600E-mutant and wild-type cerebral pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) and gangliogliomas (GGs), focusing on the role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 56 pediatric patients with histologically proven, treatment-naïve PAs and GGs who underwent conventional MRI, DWI, and molecular analysis for BRAF V600E mutation. Twenty-three subjects presented BRAF V600E-mutant (12 PAs and 11 GGs) and 33 BRAF V600E wild-type (26 PAs and 7 GGs) tumors. Imaging studies were reviewed for dominant site, margin definition, hemorrhage, calcification, cystic components, contrast enhancement, and relative mean and minimum ADC values (rADCmean and rADCmin). Statistics included Fisher's exact test, Student t test, general linear model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

PA and GG BRAF V600E-mutant had significantly lower rADCmean (p < 0.001) and rADCmin (p < 0.001) values than wild type, regardless of tumor histology and location. ROC analysis demonstrated similar performances between these parameters in predicting BRAF V600E status (rADCmean: AUC 0.831, p < 0.001; rADCmin: AUC 0.885, p < 0.001). No significant differences regarding additional imaging features emerged between BRAF V600E-mutant and wild-type lesions, with the exception of the number of tumors with cystic components, significantly higher in BRAF V600E-mutant PAs (p = 0.011) CONCLUSION: Assessment of the DWI characteristics of GGs and PAs may assist in predicting BRAF V600E status, suggesting a radiogenomic correlation and prompt molecular characterization of these tumors.