Comparative evaluation of serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein and complete hemogram indices in subjects with and without apical periodontitis: A prospective interventional study

Association of Apical Periodontitis with Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease Measured by Glomerular Filtration Rate and Systemic Markers: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of apical periodontitis (AP) in subjects with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its association with systemic markers.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 105 patients with CKD (n = 35 each in the early, predialysis, and hemodialysis groups) and 105 healthy controls were included. The prevalence, number of teeth with AP (endodontic burden [EB]), and the severity of AP were recorded. High- sensitivity C-reactive protein, blood urea, and serum creatinine levels were also recorded. Logistic regression was applied to determine the possible association between CKD and AP in the study population, and linear regression was performed to predict the effect of AP on systemic markers in CKD patients.

RESULTS

AP in at least 1 tooth was found in 75.2% of CKD patients and 40.9% of the controls (P < .05). CKD patients were 4 times more likely to have AP than controls (P < .05; odds ratio = 3.954; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-7.45). EB and the severity of AP were also significantly higher in CKD patients than the healthy controls (P < .05). Although higher values of EB and severe AP were observed with the progression of disease, the difference was not significant. The severity of AP was significantly associated with an increase in serum creatinine, blood urea, and a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < .05) in CKD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AP was significantly more prevalent in the CKD group. The association between the severity of AP and CKD markers suggests that AP could possibly alter the progression of CKD. However, these findings do not establish a cause-and-effect relationship.

PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration

Observational studies play a critical role in evaluating the prevalence and incidence of conditions or diseases in populations as well as in defining the benefits and potential hazards of health-related interventions. There are currently no reporting guidelines for observational studies in the field of Endodontics. The Preferred Reporting Items for study Designs in Endodontology (PRIDE) team has developed and published new reporting guidelines for observational-based studies called the 'Preferred Reporting items for OBservational studies in Endodontics (PROBE) 2023' guidelines. The PROBE 2023 guidelines were developed exclusively for the speciality of Endodontics by integrating and adapting the 'STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)' checklist and the 'Clinical and Laboratory Images in Publications (CLIP)' principles. The recommendations of the Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines were adhered to throughout the process of developing the guidelines. The purpose of this document is to serve as a guide for authors by providing an explanation for each of the items in the PROBE 2023 checklist along with relevant examples from the literature. The document also offers advice to authors on how they can address each item in their manuscript before submission to a journal. The PROBE 2023 checklist is freely accessible and downloadable from the PRIDE website (http://pride-endodonticguidelines.org/probe/).