Characterization and Assessment of Physical Properties of 3 Single Syringe Hydraulic Cement-based Sealers

Influence of Various Irrigation Protocols on the Push-Out Bond Strength of TotalFill and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealers to Root Dentin: A Comparative In Vitro Study

This study aimed to compare the push-out bond strength (POBS) of TotalFill (TFB) and AH Plus bioceramic (APB) sealers with different irrigation protocols.Sixty maxillary central incisors were prepared and randomly divided into three groups (n = 10) based on the final irrigation protocol. Group NC: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); Group NE: 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA; Group NH: 5.25% NaOCl and dual rinse HEDP (1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid). Samples were obturated using either TFB or APB sealer only. In groups NC and NE, NaOCl was used during canal preparation, while in Group NH, NaOCl/HEDP was utilized. The teeth were then horizontally sectioned into three 3-mm thick sections at the apical, middle, and coronal levels. The POBS was performed on the root sections at a 1 mm/min speed. The failure mode was assessed using an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope.Two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used for statistical analysis to test the interaction between sealer type and irrigation solution, while an independent t-test was conducted to compare the means of the two sealer types at a significance level of 0.05.Specimens obturated with TFB showed significantly higher POBS than APB (p < 0.001). The highest bond strength was observed in the HEDP/TFB group and the lowest in the HEDP/APB group. Irrigation did not significantly influence the POBS (p > 0.05). Mixed failure was most commonly observed in all groups (>65%).TFB sealer had improved bond strength over APB sealer, regardless of the final irrigation protocol used, which did not significantly affect the bond strength.

A laboratory study to assess the physico-chemical properties of BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow exposed to citric acid and EDTA irrigating solutions

OBJECTIVE

To assess physico-chemical properties of BioRoot RCS (powder-to-liquid formulation) and BioRoot Flow (pre-mixed formulation) after exposure to citric acid (CA) and EDTA.

METHODS

BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow specimens (5 × 2 mm) were incubated for 28 days at 37 °C before being treated with test solution (distilled water, 17% EDTA, 10% CA, 20% CA or 40% CA). Changes in mass, ion release (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy), phase composition (X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy), surface morphology (scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy) were evaluated. The Shapiro-Wilk, Levene and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test, were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The greatest mass loss, ion release and surface morphological changes (pores and cracks) of BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow occurred in 10% and 20% CA. No significant differences were identified between BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow in distilled water and EDTA (p > 0.05), whereas BioRoot Flow was significantly more soluble than BioRoot RCS in all CA solutions (p < 0.001). The main phase identified for both materials was zirconium oxide, which remained unaffected by the solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the study, 10% and 20% CA were more effective than distilled water, 17% EDTA and 40% CA in terms of dissolving BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow. The BioRoot Flow was significantly more soluble in all CA solutions than BioRoot RCS.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

10% and 20% CA solutions may have a potential to be used as a solvent for hydraulic calcium silicate sealers during endodontic retreatment.

Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC Sealer: A retrospective analysis with short-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Sealers are an important component in root canal obturation to provide the seal of the root canal system. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of hydraulic silicate sealers, commonly referred to as bioceramic sealers, due to their many advantageous properties. NeoSealer Flo (NS; Avalon Biomed USA, Houston TX) is a recently introduced premixed bioceramic sealer. There is limited evidence on its properties and clinical performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of root canal treatment using NS in a sealer-based obturation technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients in a private practice between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed to identify both initial and retreatment cases obturated with either EndoSequence BC sealer or NS using sealer-based obturation with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Treatment outcome between NS and BC was compared with chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to identify additional prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Six hundred and eighty-seven teeth met the inclusion criteria for the study. The success rate of cases obturated with BC was 94.9% and 96.5% for the cases obturated with NS. No statistically significant differences were found between the two sealer types. Presence of a periapical radiolucency or periapical radiolucency > 5.00 mm were statistically significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Endodontic treatment using BC or NS with sealer-based obturation method is a viable treatment option.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Root canal obturation with bioceramic sealers, such as NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC sealer, provide favorable clinical outcomes.

Impact of low-fusion gutta-percha cones used in variations of the continuous wave condensation technique with filling sealers based on bioceramic compounds on the quality of root canal filling

To evaluate the impact on the quality of filling with of low-fusion and conventional gutta-percha cones. Thirty-six maxillary canines were prepared and divided into three groups: I-conventional cone with Downpack at 200 °C at 4 mm from the WL; II-low-fusion cone with Downpack at 100 °C up to 4 mm from the WL; III-low-fusion cone with Downpack at 100 °C up to 7 mm from the WL. Temperature variations were measured in thirds on the external surface of the root. The bond strength was evaluated using the push-out test. The adhesive interface was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. The bond strength and the temperature variation data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the failure type using the chi-square test. The low-fusion cone group with 7 mm Downpack showed higher bond strength (4.2 ± 2.7) compared with conventional cones (2.8 ± 1.6) and low-fusion cones with 4 mm Downpack (2.9 ± 1.6) (p < 0.05), with occurrence of a higher number of adhesive failures to the filling material and mixed failures. Relative to temperature variation, there was less temperature change in the apical third, in the low-fusion cone with Downpack 7 mm (1.0 ± 1.0) (p < 0.05). The use of low-fusion cones allowed the continuous wave condensation technique to be performed at a lower depth of Downpack at 100 °C at 7 mm, with less heating in the apical third, without compromising the quality of filling. Using gutta-percha cones with low fusion, which permits a lower condensation temperature and reduced Downpack depth, maintains the quality of filling, in order to minimize possible damage to the periapical tissues.

Antibiofilm Efficacy of Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers

BACKGROUND

Using endodontic sealers with long-term antimicrobial properties can increase the success of endodontic treatment. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial activity over time of two calcium silicate (CS)-based sealers, AH Plus Bioceramic and BioRoot RCS, and to compare them with an epoxy resin-based sealer, AH Plus Jet, against mature polymicrobial biofilms grown on human radicular dentin.

METHODS

The antimicrobial activity of the sealers was tested using a direct contact test after 1 and 6 weeks of contact with the biofilms. Cell viability was determined by the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) method and flow cytometry (FC). The results of the ATP test were analyzed using an ANOVA with Welch's correction, followed by the Games-Howell test. The number of cells with damaged membranes obtained by FC in each period was compared by means of an ANOVA and Duncan's test. For the comparison between times, a Student's t-test was used.

RESULTS

Globally, after a week of contact, the epoxy resin-based sealer obtained the best results. However, at 6 weeks, the two CSs showed the highest antimicrobial efficacy, with a significant increase in this activity over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium silicate-based sealers exert long-term antimicrobial activity against endodontic biofilms.

Biocompatibility, bioactivity and immunomodulatory properties of three calcium silicate-based sealers: an in vitro study on hPDLSCs

OBJECTIVES

To assess the biocompatibility, bioactivity, and immunomodulatory properties of three new calcium silicate cement-based sealers: Ceraseal (CS), Totalfill BC Sealer (TFbc) and WellRoot ST (WR-ST) on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HPDLSCs were isolated from extracted third molars from healthy patients. Eluates (1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 ratio) and sample discs of CS, TFbc and WR-ST after setting were prepared. A series of assays were performed: cell characterization, cell metabolic activity (MTT assay) cell attachment and morphology (SEM assay), cell migration (wound-healing assay), cytoskeleton organization (phaloidin-based assay); IL-6 and IL-8 release (ELISA); differentiation marker expression (RT-qPCR assay), and cell mineralization (Alizarin Red S staining). HPDLSCs cultured in unconditioned (negative control) or osteogenic (positive control) culture media were used as a comparison. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

All the tested sealers exhibited similar results in the cytocompatibility assays (cell metabolic activity, migration, attachment, morphology, and cytoskeleton organization) compared with a negative control group. CS and TFbc exhibited an upregulation of at least one osteo/cementogenic marker compared to the negative and positive control groups. CS and TFbc also showed a significantly higher calcified nodule formation than the negative and positive control groups. Both the marker expression and calcified nodule formation were significantly higher in CS-treated cells than TFbc treated cells. WR-ST exhibited similar results to the control group. CS and TFbc-treated cells exhibited a significant downregulation of IL-6 after 72 h of culture compared to the negative control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

All the tested sealers exhibited an adequate cytocompatibility. CS significantly enhances cell differentiation by upregulating the expression of key genes associated with bone and cementum formation. Additionally, CS was observed to facilitate the mineralization of the extracellular matrix effectively. In contrast, the effects of TFbc and WR-ST on these processes were less pronounced compared to CS. Furthermore, both CS and TFbc exhibited an anti-inflammatory potential, contributing to their potential therapeutic benefits in regenerative endodontics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first study to compare the biological properties and immunomodulatory potential of Ceraseal, Totalfill BC Sealer, and WellRoot ST. The results act as supporting evidence for their use in root canal treatment.

Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements

Endodontic sealers and cements used in root canal treatment have different compositions and properties. Common to all materials is that their primary goal is to fill gaps and voids, making a permanent seal of the root canal system. Furthermore, aspects such as antibacterial properties, cytotoxicity, setting time, solubility and biocompatibility are also crucial and ought to be considered. Over the years, a shift in the view on the importance of these aspects has ocurred. Whereas the antibacterial properties were considered important when the technical factors in endodontics were less developed, the sealing ability and biocompatibility have later been considered the most critical factors. The introduction of tricalcium silicate cements and sealers has led to a renewed interest in material properties, as these cements seem to have good sealing ability and at the same time combine favourable antimicrobial effects with excellent biocompatibility. This review discusses how the various properties of root canal sealers and cements may conflict with the primary aim of providing a permanent seal of the root canal system.

Epoxy vs. Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers for Different Clinical Scenarios: A Narrative Review

This study aimed to review the considerations for choosing a suitable sealer according to various endodontic scenarios. An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science was undertaken for the keywords of 'sealer choosing', 'appropriate sealer', 'suitable sealer', 'sealer for clinical scenario', and 'sealer for clinical situations'. However, the literature review revealed a lack of studies with practical clinical recommendations regarding the choice of appropriate endodontic root canal sealers for particular clinical situations of root canal treatment. Therefore, a narrative review was undertaken under the basis of the characteristics of an epoxy resin-based sealer (ERS) versus a calcium silicate-based sealer (CSS). Based on the evidence found through the review, the choice of an appropriate sealer in a variety of clinical scenarios was proposed. An ERS is recommended for one-visit non-vital cases, teeth with periodontal involvement, cracked teeth, and internal root resorption without root perforation. A CSS is recommended for vital or non-vital cases in multiple visits, teeth with internal root resorption with perforation or internal approach for external cervical resorption, teeth with open apices, and teeth with iatrogenic aberrations.