Post-Caesarean Section Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Using an Online Database and Mobile Phone Technology

Surveillance of surgical site infections among caesarean section in VINCat hospitals: Results from 2008 to 2022

BACKGROUND

The VINCat programme focuses on monitoring surgical site infections (SSI) in caesarean sections (CS) performed across affiliated hospitals.

METHODS

The study included CS performed from 2008 to 2022, with a follow-up of 30 days after the intervention. The analysis of cumulative incidence rate of SSI was stratified into three 5-year periods (Periods 1-3). SSI was defined according to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) classification. SSI surveillance was carried out in accordance with the methodology established by the VINCat programme.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2022, 36,387 CS were surveyed at 34 hospitals: 13,502 in Period 1, 12,985 in Period 2 and 9900 in Period 3. The mean age was 33 years. Overall, SSI incidence fell from 3.81% in Period 1 to 2.66% in Period 3 (rho=-0.838; p<0.001). Superficial SSI decreased from 3.1% in Period 1 to 2.15% in Period 3 (rho=-0.795; p<0.001). The rate of organ-space SSI remained consistent across all three periods, maintaining a rate of 0.27 (rho=-0.092; p=0.745). Culture was performed in 58.9% of infections. The microorganisms most frequently identified were Staphylococcus aureus (20.64%), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (13.52%), and Escherichia coli (11.27%). Antibiotic prophylaxis was appropriate in 73.76% of the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate monitoring of post-CS SSI rates allows the implementation of preventive measures to reduce their incidence.

The experience of infection prevention and control nurse (IPCN) in conducting post-discharge surveillance (PDS) of surgical site infections (SSI): A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Surgical Site infections (SSI) are healthcare-associated infections (HAI) resulting from surgical procedures, which can increase morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. SSI surveillance is useful for detecting the magnitude of SSI cases and evaluating the impact of SSI prevention implementation. Post-discharge surveillance (PDS) of SSIs may identify more significant cases. To the best of our knowledge, there is no research exploring the experiences of Infection Prevention and Control Nurse (IPCN) in conducting PDS of SSI.

METHODS

To explore the experience of IPCN in conducting PDS of SSI. A qualitative transcendent phenomenological (descriptive) research, using a purposive sampling technique with 15 informants from 9 hospitals in Indonesia. Data were collected through in-depth direct and semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis through Nvivo 12 plus software.

RESULTS

Five themes were generated, including the stages of PDS of SSI, the collaborative role of PDS of SSI officers, inhibiting factors of PDS of SSI, supporting factors of PDS of SSI, and optimization of PDS of SSI.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a deep understanding of the implementation PDS of SSI through an exploration of IPCN experiences, offering insights into the execution and various challenges faced by hospitals in conducting PDS of SSI.

Text message questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Cesarean section-A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Inadequate pain relief with moderate to severe pain remains a challenge after cesarean section and may significantly impair postoperative recovery. However, detailed assessment on the timing of severe pain, opioid consumption, influence on activities such as mobilization, breastfeeding, and caring for the infant are difficult to conduct, especially after discharge. Short message services (SMS)-based questionnaires may offer a low-cost way of providing such data but with the risk of insufficient response rates. We assessed the feasibility of collecting detailed, prospective data on postoperative pain and recovery during the initial hours and days following cesarean section using SMS-based questionnaires.

METHODS

Prospective Danish single-center cohort study involving elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia with fentanyl and bupivacaine. The postoperative pain regimen consisted of paracetamol, NSAID and oral morphine by request. Patients received an SMS-based questionnaire at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, as well as on days 7 and 30.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Response rate and time from receiving the SMS to completion of the questionnaires.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Opioid consumption and Patient Reported Outcomes Measures on pain and recovery.

RESULTS

From December 2022 to June 2023; 100 patients were included. The response rate was 78% at 6 h postoperatively, decreasing to 63% at 24 h. The median response time from receiving to answering the SMS-based questionnaire at 6 h after cesarean section was 23 min (IQR 2-72), decreasing to 20 min (IQR 2-78) after 24 h. Severe pain, corresponding to a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score >6, was reported by 57% (95% CI 65-84) at 6 h, decreasing to 28% (95% CI 34-58) at 24 h. Median opioid consumption within the first 24 h was 30 mg (IQR 20-50).

CONCLUSION

SMS-based questionnaires on Patient Reported Outcome Measures are a feasible and cost-effective way of prospectively collecting frequent data with acceptable response rates, even shortly after cesarean section. Secondarily 66% of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 h following cesarean section, with the highest pain scores within the initial 12 h. Future studies should focus on optimizing pain-management within this timeframe.

Usability and outcomes of self-monitored surgical wound healing using a smartphone-based application by patients following neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

The Radboudumc developed a smartphone application (WondGezond) to collect surgical wound-healing information provided by the patient.

AIM

To evaluate usability and outcomes to assess its potential for early surgical site infection (SSI) detection.

METHODS

Patients surgically treated for degenerative spinal disorders or carpal tunnel syndrome between August 2020 and February 2023 were enrolled one day post surgery and asked to download the app via a quick-response (QR) code. Participants uploaded a photo and answered four questions about their wound daily, for 14 days. Afterwards, participants indicated whether they received treatment for a suspected SSI (participant-reported outcome). Two neurosurgeons independently assessed photos and questionnaire answers for suspected SSIs (physician-assessed outcome). The association between both outcomes was determined by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV).

FINDINGS

After 2009 surgeries, 1695 QR-codes were distributed and 412 (21%) were activated. In all, 232 (56%) participants completed the 14-day period of whom 22 (10%) reported SSI treatment. Physician assessment identified 15 (7%) SSIs. Concordance was reached in 88% of cases. Among 27 discordant cases were 17 false-positives and 10 false-negatives, resulting in low sensitivity (33%) and PPV (23%), but high NPV (95%).

CONCLUSION

WondGezond provides clinicians with information regarding wound healing and SSIs to follow-up on patients at risk, while possibly also reducing antibiotic (over)treatment and unnecessary visits for patients without issues in wound healing. However, the low participation and false-positive results render the app in its current form unsuitable for surveillance purposes. Further validation of WondGezond is required.

Current Approaches to Following Up Women and Newborns After Discharge From Childbirth Facilities: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

The postpartum period is critical for the health and well-being of women and newborns, but there is limited research on the most effective methods of post-childbirth follow-up. This scoping review synthesizes evidence from high-, middle-, and low-income countries on approaches to following up individuals after discharge from childbirth facilities.

METHODS

Using a systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE, we identified quantitative studies describing post-discharge follow-up methods deployed up to 12 months postpartum. We searched for English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2007 and November 2, 2022, with search terms covering 2 broad areas: "postpartum/postnatal period" and "surveillance." We single-screened titles and abstracts and double-extracted all included articles, recording study design and location, population, health outcome, method, timing and frequency of data collection, and percentage of study participants reached.

RESULTS

We identified 1,654 records, of which 31 studies were included. Eight studies used in-person visits to follow up participants, 10 used telephone calls, 7 used self-administered questionnaires, and 6 used multiple methods. Across studies, the minimum length of follow-up was 1 week after delivery, and up to 4 contacts were made within the first year after delivery. Follow-up (response) rates ranged from 23% to100%. Postpartum infection was the most common outcome investigated. Other outcomes included maternal (ill-)health, neonatal (ill-)health and growth, maternal mental health and well-being, care-giving/-seeking behaviors, and knowledge and intentions.

CONCLUSION

Our scoping review identified multiple follow-up methods after discharge, ranging from home visits to self-administered electronic questionnaires, which could be implemented with high response rates. The studies demonstrated that post-discharge follow-up of women and newborns was feasible, well received, and important for identifying postpartum illness or complications that would otherwise be missed. Therefore, the identified methods have the potential to become an important component of fostering a continuum of care and measuring and addressing postpartum morbidity.

Establishing semi-automated infection surveillance in obstetrics and gynaecology

BACKGROUND

Surveillance is an acknowledged method to decrease nosocomial infections, such as surgical site infections (SSIs). Electronic healthcare records create the opportunity for automated surveillance. While approaches for different types of surgeries and indicators already exist, there are very few for obstetrics and gynaecology.

AIM

To analyse the sensitivity and workload reduction of semi-automated surveillance in obstetrics and gynaecology.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-centre study at a 1438-bed tertiary care hospital in Germany, semi-automated SSI surveillance using the indicators 'antibiotic prescription', 'microbiological data' and 'administrative data' (diagnosis codes, readmission, post-hospitalization care) was compared with manual analysis and categorization of all patient files. Breast surgeries (BSs) conducted in 2018 and caesarean sections (CSs) that met the inclusion criteria between May 2013 and December 2019 were included. Indicators were analysed for sensitivity, number of analysed procedures needed to identify one case, and potential workload reduction in detecting SSIs in comparison with the control group.

FINDINGS

The reference standard showed nine SSIs in 416 BSs (2.2%). Sensitivities for the indicators 'antibiotic prescription', 'diagnosis code', 'microbiological sample taken', and the combination 'diagnosis code or microbiological sample' were 100%, 88.9%, 66.7% and 100%, respectively. The reference standard showed 54 SSIs in 3438 CSs (1.6%). Sensitivities for the indicators 'collection of microbiological samples', 'diagnosis codes', 'readmission/post-hospitalization care', and the combination of all indicators were 38.9%, 27.8%, 85.2% and 94.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Semi-automated surveillance systems may reduce workload by maintaining high sensitivity depending on the type of surgery, local circumstances and thorough digitalization.

Digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection

AIMS

Conduct a scoping review on the development and use of digital tools for post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Science Direct, PubMed, Embase, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from 2013 to May 2022. Six intellectual property registries were reviewed from 2013 to 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute model, and included intellectual property records (applications, prototypes and software) and scientific articles published in any language on the development and/or testing of digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection among surgical patients aged 18 and over.

RESULTS

One intellectual property record and 13 scientific articles were identified, covering 10 digital tools. The intellectual property record was developed and registered by a China educational institution in 2018. The majority of manuscripts were prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials, published between 2016 and 2022, and more than half were conducted in the United States. The population included adult patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic, vascular, abdominal, arthroplasty and caesarean surgery. The main functionalities of the digital tools were the previously prepared questionnaire, the attachment of a wound image, the integrated Web system and the evaluation of data by the health team, with post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance time between 14 and 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Digital tools show promise for the surveillance of surgical site infection, collaborating with the early detection of wound infection.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Mobile technology was favourable for detecting surgical site infections, reducing unnecessary visits to the health service, and increasing patient satisfaction.

IMPACT

Technological advances in the health area open new perspectives for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: There is underreporting of surgical site infections due to difficulties related to traditional methods of post-discharge surveillance. The use of digital tools within surgical site infection surveillance is increasing. Benefits of using digital tools within surgical site infection surveillance have been reported. WHAT HAS THIS STUDY ADDED TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?: This scoping review is one of the first to analyse the development and use of digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection in different countries. The main functionalities of digital tools are: structured questionnaires; attachment of wound images; integrated web systems; and evaluation of data by professionals. The use of mobile technology is favourable for detecting surgical site infections with a reduction in costs from face-to-face consultations and increased patient satisfaction. WHERE AND ON WHOM WILL THE RESEARCH HAVE AN IMPACT?: Healthcare providers can successfully use digital tools for surgical site infection post-discharge surveillance. Remote monitoring can reduce unnecessary patient visits to healthcare facilities. Policy makers can study how to implement digital platforms for remote patient monitoring.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA statement for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in the OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BA8D6).

Inter-rater agreement of CDC criteria and ASEPSIS score in assessing surgical site infections after cesarean section: a prospective observational study

Objective

To assess and compare the inter-rater agreement of the CDC criteria and the ASEPSIS score in identifying surgical site infections after cesarean section.

Methods

Prospective observational study including 110 patients subjected to a cesarean section at our institution. Surgical wounds were managed according to standard care and were photographed on the third, seventh, and thirtieth postoperative day or during any evaluation in case of complications. Three expert surgeons reviewed the prospectively gathered data and photographs and classified each wound using CDC criteria and the ASEPSIS score. The inter-rater agreements of CDC criteria and ASEPSIS score were determined with Krippendorff's Alpha with linear weights and compared with a confidence interval approach.

Results

The weighted α coefficient for CDC criteria was 0.587 (95%CI, 0.411-0.763, p < 0.001, "moderate" agreement according to Altman's interpretation of weighted agreement coefficient), while the weighted α coefficient for the ASEPSIS score was 0.856 (95%CI, 0.733-0.980, p < 0.001, "very good" agreement).

Conclusion

ASEPSIS score presents a "very good" inter-rater agreement for surgical site infections identification after cesarean, resulting in a more objective method than CDC criteria ("moderate" inter-rater agreement). ASEPSIS score could represent an objective tool for managing and monitoring surgical site infections after cesarean section, also by photographic evaluation.

Developing a mobile health application for wound telemonitoring: a pilot study on abdominal surgeries post-discharge care

BACKGROUND

Many early signs of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) developed during the first thirty days after discharge remain inadequately recognized by patients. Hence, it is important to use interactive technologies for patient support in these times. It helps to diminish unnecessary exposure and in-person outpatient visits. Therefore, this study aims to develop a follow-up system for remote monitoring of SSIs in abdominal surgeries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This pilot study was carried out in two phases including development and pilot test of the system. First, the main requirements of the system were extracted through a literature review and exploration of the specific needs of abdominal surgery patients in the post-discharge period. Next extracted data was validated according to the agreement level of 30 clinical experts by the Delphi method. After confirming the conceptual model and the primary prototype, the system was designed. In the pilot test phase, the usability of the system was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by the participation of patients and clinicians.

RESULTS

The general architecture of the system consists of a mobile application as a patient portal and a web-based platform for patient remote monitoring and 30-day follow-up by the healthcare provider. Application has a wide range of functionalities including collecting surgery-related documents, and regular assessment of self-reported symptoms via systematic tele-visits based on predetermined indexes and wound images. The risk-based models embedded in the database included a minimum set with 13 rules derived from the incidence, frequency, and severity of SSI-related symptoms. Accordingly, alerts were generated and displayed via notifications and flagged items on clinicians' dashboards. In the pilot test phase, out of five scheduled tele-visits, 11 (of 13) patients (85%), completed at least two visits. The nurse-centered support was very helpful in the recovery stage. Finally, the result of a pilot usability evaluation showed users' satisfaction and willingness to use the system.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a telemonitoring system is potentially feasible and acceptable. Applying this system as part of routine postoperative care management can provide positive effects and outcomes, especially in the era of coronavirus disease when more willingness to telecare service is considered.

Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice

Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73-4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06-4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41-4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13-4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92-4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement.

Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis

An increasing number of digital health interventions (DHIs) for remote postoperative monitoring have been developed and evaluated. This systematic review identifies DHIs for postoperative monitoring and evaluates their readiness for implementation into routine health care. Studies were defined according to idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term follow-up (IDEAL) stages of innovation. A novel clinical innovation network analysis used coauthorship and citations to examine collaboration and progression within the field. 126 DHIs were identified, with 101 (80%) being early stage innovations (IDEAL stage 1 and 2a). None of the DHIs identified had large-scale routine implementation. There is little evidence of collaboration, and there are clear omissions in the evaluation of feasibility, accessibility, and the health-care impact. Use of DHIs for postoperative monitoring remains at an early stage of innovation, with promising but generally low-quality supporting evidence. Comprehensive evaluation within high-quality, large-scale trials and real-world data are required to definitively establish readiness for routine implementation.

Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review

Complications following surgery are common and frequently occur the following discharge. Mobile and wearable digital health interventions (DHI) provide an opportunity to monitor and support patients during their postoperative recovery. Lack of high-quality evidence is often cited as a barrier to DHI implementation. This review captures and appraises the current use, evidence base and reporting quality of mobile and wearable DHI following surgery. Keyword searches were performed within Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and WHO Global Index Medicus databases, together with clinical trial registries and Google scholar. Studies involving patients undergoing any surgery requiring skin incision where postoperative outcomes were measured using a DHI following hospital discharge were included, with DHI defined as mobile and wireless technologies for health to improve health system efficiency and health outcomes. Methodological reporting quality was determined using the validated mobile health evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) guidelines. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomised studies or MINORS depending on study type. Overall, 6969 articles were screened, with 44 articles included. The majority (n = 34) described small prospective study designs, with a high risk of bias demonstrated. Reporting standards were suboptimal across all domains, particularly in relation to data security, prior patient engagement and cost analysis. Despite the potential of DHI to improve postoperative patient care, current progress is severely restricted by limitations in methodological reporting. There is an urgent need to improve reporting for DHI following surgery to identify patient benefit, promote reproducibility and encourage sustainability.

Mobile health technology for remote home monitoring after surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mobile health (mHealth) technology has been proposed as a method of improving post-discharge surveillance. Little is known about how mHealth has been used to track patients after surgery and whether its use is associated with differences in postoperative recovery.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials) were searched to identify studies published between January 1999 and February 2021. Mobile health was defined as any smartphone or tablet computer capable of electronically capturing health-related patient information and transmitting these data to the clinical team. Comparable outcomes were pooled via meta-analysis with additional studies compiled via narrative review. The quality of each study was assessed based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. While the majority of devices were designed to capture general health information, others were specifically adapted to the expected outcomes or potential complications of the index procedure. Exposure to mHealth was associated with fewer emergency department visits (odds ratio 0.42, 95 per cent c.i. 0.23 to 0.79) and readmissions (odds ratio 0.47, 95 per cent c.i. 0.29 to 0.77) as well as accelerated improvements in quality of life after surgery. There were limited data on other postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Remote home monitoring via mHealth is feasible, adaptable, and may even promote more effective postoperative care. Given the rapid expansion of mHealth, physicians and policymakers need to understand these technologies better so that they can be integrated into high-quality clinical care.

Prevalence of surgical site infection after orthopaedic surgery with two types of drainage at three public hospitals in Iran

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most important and prevalent because implanted devices are used in such surgeries which increase the risk of infection. This study aimed to examine the incidence of infection in orthopaedic surgeries and related factors in a group of public hospitals in Iran.

METHODS

This analytical cross-sectional study was condcuted in 2018. Data were collected about the incidence of infection and related factors including use/non-use of drains and well as types of drain . The presence of SSIs were determined using a researcher-devised Wound Infection Checklist (WIC) and microbial cultures.

RESULTS

Of 110 included patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries, 18.2% had an infection. The highest rate of infection was associated with lower extremity surgeries following tibia and fibula fractures. The incidence of infection among individuals under the age of 35 years was also higher. Emergency procedures demonstrated a higher incidence of infection. No significant relationship was observed between use of wound drains and development of SSIs.

CONCLUSION

Reducing the incidence of orthopaedic infection can be achieved by focusing more attention on open fractures occurring in the lower extremity. Use of surgical drains for the sole purpose of reducing the rate of infection is not effective. Accordingly, infection provention protocols should be implemented in orthopaedic surgery units to control and reduce rates of infection.

A mobile application for wound and symptom surveillance after colorectal surgery: a feasibility randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common nosocomial infection and occur in 16.3% of patients undergoing colorectal surgery at our institution (The Ottawa Hospital), the majority of which are identified after discharge from hospital. Patients who suspect having an SSI generally present to the emergency department or surgery clinic. Both options for in-person interaction are costly to the health care system and patients. A mobile app, how2trak, has proven to be beneficial for patients with complex wounds at our institution by facilitating at-home monitoring and virtual consultations.

Objective

This study aims to assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to assess if how2trak can improve patients’ experience and increase detection of SSIs after colorectal surgery while reducing patients’ risk of COVID-19 exposure.

Methods

In this single-center prospective feasibility trial, eligible patients undergoing colorectal surgery will be randomized to either standard care or how2trak postoperative monitoring of their incision, symptoms, and ostomy function. Patient self-assessments will be monitored by a nurse specialized in wound and ostomy care who will follow-up with patients with a suspected SSI. The primary outcome is feasibility as measured by enrollment, randomization, app usability, data extraction, and resource capacity.

Results

This study was approved by our institution’s ethics board on February 26, 2021, and received support from The Ottawa Hospital Innovation and Care Funding on November 12, 2021. Recruitment started June 3, 2021, and 29 were patients enrolled as of September 2021. We expect to publish results in spring 2022.

Conclusions

This study will determine the feasibility of using a mobile app to monitor patients’ wounds and detect SSIs after colorectal surgery. If feasible, we plan to assess if this mobile app facilitates SSI detection, enhances patient experience, and optimizes their care.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04869774; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04869774

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/26717

Diagnosing surgical site infections using telemedicine: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) are preventable post-operative complications. With the increase in use of telehealth modalities, there is a need to assess if telehealth modalities are safe for assessment of SSI.

AIM

This review aims to assess the accuracy of using telemedicine in the diagnosis of SSI in post-surgical adult patients as compared to in-person assessments.

METHODS

A comprehensive search on 6 databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CENTRAL) was performed from inception to 1 December 2020. Data was extracted to determine accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, and usability of using telemedicine to detect SSIs. The primary outcome of this review was to review the diagnostic accuracy of telemedicine to diagnose SSIs as compared to direct, in-person assessment. Methodological quality was evaluated using the MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

Six studies met inclusion criteria. Results were summarized qualitatively. The overall methodological quality of the studies was moderate based on the MINORS score. Four studies utilized telephone surveillance, whilst two utilized mobile applications. Telemedicine modalities were able to accurately diagnose 66 SSIs, where an additional 15 were found on direct clinical review. The diagnostic accuracy across the studies ranged from 69.5 to 100%. Between 82.5 and 100% of patients were able to be contacted through these telemedicine modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine modalities are a feasible option for post-operative follow-up, especially in the identification of SSIs. As technology becomes more affordable and widely available, future applications of telemedicine are limitless. However, further research is still required to ensure that telemedicine is a safe and effective tool.

Diagnosing Post-Cesarean Surgical Site Infections in Rural Rwanda: Development, Validation, and Field Testing of a Screening Algorithm for Use by Community Health Workers

Background: We aimed to develop and validate a screening algorithm to assist community health workers (CHWs) in identifying surgical site infections (SSIs) after cesarean section (c-section) in rural Africa. Methods: Patients were adult women who underwent c-section at a Rwandan rural district hospital between March and October 2017. A CHW administered a nine-item clinical questionnaire 10 ± 3 days post-operatively. Independently, a general practitioner (GP) administered the same questionnaire and assessed SSI presence by physical examination. The GP's SSI diagnosis was used as the gold standard. Using a simplified Classification and Regression Tree analysis, we identified a subset of screening questions with maximum sensitivity for the GP and CHW and evaluated the subset's sensitivity and specificity in a validation dataset. Then, we compared the subset's results when implemented in the community by CHWs with health center-reported SSI. Results: Of the 596 women enrolled, 525 (88.1%) completed the clinical questionnaire. The combination of questions concerning fever, pain, and discolored drainage maximized sensitivity for both the GPs (sensitivity = 96.8%; specificity = 85.6%) and CHWs (sensitivity = 87.1%; specificity = 73.8%). In the validation dataset, this subset had sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 83.3% for the GP-administered questions and sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 81.4% for the CHW-administered questions. In the community screening, the overall percent agreement between CHW and health center diagnoses was 81.1% (95% confidence interval: 77.2%-84.6%). Conclusions: We identified a subset of questions that had good predictive features for SSI, but its sensitivity was lower when administered by CHWs in a clinical setting, and it performed poorly in the community. Methods to improve diagnostic ability, including training or telemedicine, must be explored.