No. 352-Technical Update: The Role of Early Comprehensive Fetal Anatomy Ultrasound Examination

Pearls and Pitfalls of First-Trimester US Screening and Prenatal Testing: A Pictorial Review

First-trimester US is imperative in evaluation of early pregnancy to confirm pregnancy location and number and gestational age. The 2024 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference established a first-trimester lexicon to highlight the importance of clear and concise language, which is incorporated and featured by the authors. With improved technologies and understanding of fetal development, first-trimester anatomic studies, between 11 weeks and 13 weeks 6 days gestation, are becoming more frequently used. While not a replacement for the second-trimester anatomic study, systematic evaluation of fetal anatomy at this early gestational age allows detection of 40%-70% of anomalies, whether structural or related to aneuploidy. All patients, regardless of age or baseline risk, should be offered screening and diagnostic testing for chromosomal abnormalities. A variety of prenatal screening approaches are available, each with strengths and limitations. Noninvasive prenatal testing with detection of fetal cell-free DNA can be performed in the first trimester and is the most sensitive and specific screening for the common fetal aneuploidies, but is not equivalent to diagnostic testing. Alternatively, serum analytes for maternal biomarkers in conjunction with nuchal translucency (NT) measurement can be used to calculate a risk estimate for common trisomies. Increased NT is the most common abnormality seen in the first trimester. Positive screening results, increased NT, or other anomaly at US should prompt genetic counseling and be confirmed with diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis). Early detection of aneuploidy and structural anomalies allows counseling and informs decisions for pregnancy management. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Guideline No. 456: Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

To review the available prenatal aneuploidy screening options and to provide updated clinical guidelines for reproductive care providers.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant persons receiving counselling and providing informed consent for prenatal screening.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline should increase clinician competency to offer counselling for prenatal screening options and provide appropriate interventions. Given the variety of available options for prenatal screening with different performance, cost, and availability across Canada, appropriate counselling is of paramount importance to offer the best individual choice to Canadian pregnant persons. Prenatal screening may cause anxiety, and the decisions about prenatal diagnostic procedures are complex given the potential risk of fetal loss.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to July 2023, using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, non-invasive prenatal screening) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1995 to July 2023.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Health care providers involved in prenatal screening, including general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, geneticists, and radiologists.

SOCIAL MEDIA ABSTRACT

Non-invasive prenatal screening is the most accurate method for detecting major aneuploidies. It is not universally available in the public health system and has some limitations.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Obstetrics and Gynecology Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Obstetrics and Gynecology Expert Panel consists of radiologists specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, obstetrics and gynecology physicians, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 12 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a systematic rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 46 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 68 recommendation statements across the 12 scenarios related to the evaluation of obstetrics and gynecology clinical and diagnostic scenarios. This guideline presents the methods of development and the imaging recommendations for a variety of obstetrical and gynecological conditions including pregnancy assessment, recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss, post-partum indications, disorders of menstruation, localization of intra-uterine contraceptive device, infertility assessment, assessment of adnexal mass, pelvic pain of presumed gynecological origin, and pelvic floor evaluation.

Directive clinique no 440 : Prise en charge de la grossesse gémellaire monochoriale

OBJECTIF

Cette directive clinique passe en revue les données probantes sur la prise en charge de la grossesse gémellaire monochoriale normale et compliquée.

POPULATION CIBLE

Les femmes menant une grossesse gémellaire ou multiple de haut rang. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'application des recommandations de cette directive devrait améliorer la prise en charge des grossesses gémellaires (ou multiples de haut rang) monochoriales compliquées et non compliquées. Ces recommandations aideront les fournisseurs de soins à surveiller adéquatement les grossesses gémellaires monochoriales ainsi qu'à détecter et prendre en charge rapidement les complications associées de façon optimale afin de réduire les risques de morbidité et mortalité périnatales. Ces recommandations impliquent une surveillance échographique plus fréquente en cas de grossesse monochoriale qu'en cas de grossesse bichoriale. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée a été colligée par des recherches dans les bases de données PubMed et Cochrane Library au moyen de termes MeSH pertinents (Twins, Monozygotic; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Placenta; Fetofetal Transfusion; Fetal Death; Fetal Growth Retardation). Les résultats ont été restreints aux revues systématiques, aux essais cliniques randomisés et aux études observationnelles. Aucune date limite n'a été appliquée, mais les résultats ont été limités aux contenus en anglais ou en français. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs principaux ont rédigé le contenu et les recommandations et ils se sont entendus sur ces derniers. Le conseil d'administration de la SOGC a approuvé la version définitive aux fins de publication. Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle, obstétriciens, radiologues, échographistes, médecins de famille, infirmières, sages-femmes, résidents et autres fournisseurs de soins de santé qui s'occupent de femmes menant une grossesse gémellaire ou multiple de haut rang. RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: Directive canadienne (SOGC) pour le diagnostic, la surveillance échographique et la prise en charge des complications de la grossesse gémellaire monochoriale (p. ex., STT, TAPS, retard de croissance sélectif, cojumeau acardiaque, monoamnionicité et mort d'un jumeau). DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 440: Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the evidence-based management of normal and complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with monochorionic twin or higher order multiple pregnancies.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of these recommendations should improve the management of both complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic (and higher order multiple) twin pregnancies. They will help users monitor monochorionic twin pregnancies appropriately and identify and manage monochorionic twin complications optimally in a timely manner, thereby reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality. These recommendations entail more frequent ultrasound monitoring of monochorionic twins compared to dichorionic twins.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate MeSH headings (Twins, Monozygotic; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Placenta; Fetofetal Transfusion; Fetal Death; Fetal Growth Retardation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English or French language materials.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Maternal-fetal medicine specialists, obstetricians, radiologists, sonographers, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who care for women with monochorionic twin or higher order multiple pregnancies.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Canadian (SOGC) guidelines for the diagnosis, ultrasound surveillance and management of monochorionic twin pregnancy complications, including TTTS, TAPS, sFGR (sIUGR), acardiac (TRAP), monoamniotic twins and intrauterine death of one MC twin.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Reproductive health after thoracic transplantation: An ISHLT expert consensus statement

Pregnancy after thoracic organ transplantation is feasible for select individuals but requires multidisciplinary subspecialty care. Key components for a successful pregnancy after lung or heart transplantation include preconception and contraceptive planning, thorough risk stratification, optimization of maternal comorbidities and fetal health through careful monitoring, and open communication with shared decision-making. The goal of this consensus statement is to summarize the current evidence and provide guidance surrounding preconception counseling, patient risk assessment, medical management, maternal and fetal outcomes, obstetric management, and pharmacologic considerations.

Original article: is the protective association between hyperemesis gravidarum and birth defects biased by pregnancy termination?

PURPOSE

We assessed whether the protective association between hyperemesis gravidarum and birth defects could be due to selection bias from exclusion of pregnancy terminations.

METHODS

We designed a cohort study of 2,115,581 live births in Canada, 1990-2016. The main exposure measure was hyperemesis gravidarum. The main outcome measure included any birth defect at delivery. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of hyperemesis gravidarum with birth defects in log-binomial regression models, and assessed the extent of selection bias through correction factors.

RESULTS

Hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with 0.88 times the risk of birth defects in models not corrected for bias (95% CI 0.82-0.94). Correction for selection bias suggested that if screening for birth defects was associated with 1.33 times the chance of detecting birth defects and having a pregnancy termination, there would be no association with hyperemesis gravidarum. If ultrasound was associated with 2.00 times the chance of detecting birth defects and 1.50 times the risk of pregnancy termination, hyperemesis gravidarum would be associated with 1.27 times the risk of birth defects (95% CI 1.18-1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

The protective association between hyperemesis gravidarum and birth defects in previous studies may be due to selection bias.

Guideline No. 410: Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Pregnancy Management for Fetal Neural Tube Defects

OBJECTIVE

This revised guideline is intended to provide an update on the genetic aspects, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal neural tube defects.

TARGET POPULATION

Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant. Neural tube defect screening should be offered to all pregnant women.

OPTIONS

For prevention: a folate-rich diet, and folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ supplementation, with dosage depending on risk level. For screening: second-trimester anatomical sonography; first-trimester sonographic screening; maternal serum alpha fetoprotein; prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. For genetic testing: diagnostic amniocentesis with chromosomal microarray and amniotic fluid alpha fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase; fetal exome sequencing. For pregnancy management: prenatal surgical repair; postnatal surgical repair; pregnancy termination with autopsy. For subsequent pregnancies: prevention and screening options and counselling.

OUTCOMES

The research on and implementation of fetal surgery for prenatally diagnosed myelomeningocele has added a significant treatment option to the previous options (postnatal repair or pregnancy termination), but this new option carries an increased risk of maternal morbidity. Significant improvements in health and quality of life, both for the mother and the infant, have been shown to result from the prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of fetal neural tube defects.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The benefits for patient autonomy and decision-making are provided in the guideline. Harms include an unexpected fetal diagnosis and the subsequent management decisions. Harm can also result if the patient declines routine sonographic scans or if counselling and access to care for neural tube defects are delayed. Cost analysis (personal, family, health care) is not within the scope of this clinical practice guideline.

EVIDENCE

A directed and focused literature review was conducted using the search terms spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis, and neural tube defect management in order to update and revise this guideline. A peer review process was used for content validation and clarity, with appropriate ethical considerations.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Maternity care professionals who provide any part of pre-conception, antenatal, delivery, and neonatal care. This guideline is also appropriate for patient education. RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Directive clinique no 410 : Anomalies du tube neural : Prévention, dépistage, diagnostic et prise en charge de la grossesse

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique révisée vise à fournir une mise à jour sur les aspects génétiques, la prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et la prise en charge des anomalies du tube neural.

POPULATION CIBLE

Les femmes enceintes ou qui pourraient le devenir. Il convient d'offrir le dépistage des anomalies du tube neural à toutes les femmes enceintes.

OPTIONS

Pour la prévention : un régime alimentaire riche en acide folique et des suppléments d'acide folique et de vitamine B₁₂ selon une posologie d'après le niveau de risque. Pour le dépistage : l'échographie obstétricale du deuxième trimestre, le dépistage échographique du premier trimestre, le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine sérique maternelle et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique prénatale. Pour les tests génétiques : l'amniocentèse diagnostique avec analyse chromosomique sur micropuce et le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine et de l'acétylcholinestérase dans le liquide amniotique et le séquençage de l'exome fœtal. Pour la prise en charge de la grossesse : la réparation chirurgicale prénatale, la réparation chirurgicale postnatale et l'interruption de grossesse avec autopsie. Pour les grossesses subséquentes : les options de prévention et de dépistage et les conseils. RéSULTATS: La recherche et la mise en œuvre du traitement chirurgical fœtal en cas de diagnostic prénatal de myéloméningocèle ont ajouté une option thérapeutique fœtale importante aux options précédentes (réparation postnatale ou interruption de grossesse), mais cette nouvelle option comporte un risque accru de morbidité maternelle. La prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et le traitement des anomalies du tube neural se révèlent entraîner des améliorations importantes à la mère et au nourrisson en matière de santé et de qualité de vie. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Le type et l'ampleur des bénéfices, risques et coûts attendus pour les patientes grâce à la mise en œuvre de la présente directive clinique par un établissement de soins de santé intègrent un canal maternel préconception et prénatal adéquat comprenant l'accès des patientes aux soins, les conseils, les analyses et examens, l'imagerie, le diagnostic et l'interprétation. Les bénéfices relatifs à l'autonomie de la patiente et au processus décisionnel sont énoncés dans la présente directive clinique. Les risques comprennent un diagnostic fœtal inattendu et les décisions de prise en charge subséquentes. Le fait que la patiente refuse les échographies habituelles et le retard du conseil ou d'accès aux soins en cas d'anomalie du tube neural comportent également des risques. L'analyse des coûts (personnels, familiaux, santé publique) ne fait pas partie de la portée de la présente directive clinique. DONNéES PROBANTES: Afin de mettre à jour et réviser la présente directive, une revue de la littérature ciblée et dirigée a été effectuée à l'aide des termes de recherche suivants : spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis et neural tube defect management. Un processus d'examen par les pairs a été utilisé pour la validation et la clarté du contenu, avec des considérations appropriées d'ordre éthique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Consulter l'annexe A en ligne (le tableau A1 pour les définitions et le tableau A2 pour les interprétations des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Professionnels des soins de maternité qui offrent des soins préconception, prénataux, obstétricaux ou néonataux. La présente directive clinique convient également aux fins d'éducation des patientes. RECOMMANDATIONS (CLASSEMENT GRADE ENTRE PARENTHèSES).

Guideline No. 391-Pregnancy and Maternal Obesity Part 1: Pre-conception and Prenatal Care

OBJECTIVE

This guideline will review key aspects in the pregnancy care of women with obesity. Part I will focus on pre-conception and pregnancy care. Part II will focus on team planning for delivery and Postpartum Care.

INTENDED USERS

All health care providers (obstetricians, family doctors, midwives, nurses, anaesthesiologists) who provide pregnancy-related care to women with obesity.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with obesity who are pregnant or planning pregnancies.

EVIDENCE

Literature was retrieved through searches of Statistics Canada, Medline, and The Cochrane Library on the impact of obesity in pregnancy on antepartum and intrapartum care, maternal morbidity and mortality, obstetrical anaesthesia, and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to September 2018. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the authors. Then the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee peer reviewed the content and submitted comments for consideration, and the Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) approved the final draft for publication. Areas of disagreement were discussed during meetings, at which time consensus was reached. The level of evidence and quality of the recommendation made were described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in these guidelines may increase obstetrical provider recognition of the issues affected pregnant individuals with obesity, including clinical prevention strategies, communication between the health care team, the patient and family as well as equipment and human resource planning. It is hoped that regional, provincial and federal agencies will assist in the education and support of coordinated care for pregnant individuals with obesity.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

SOGC guidelines will be automatically reviewed 5 years after publication. However, authors can propose another review date if they feel that 5 years is too short/long based on their expert knowledge of the subject matter.

SPONSORS

This guideline was developed with resources funded by the SOGC.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

No. 375-Clinical Practice Guideline on the Use of First Trimester Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the clinical indications for first trimester ultrasound.

OUTCOME

Proven clinical benefit has been reported from first trimester ultrasound.

EVIDENCE

A Medline search and bibliography reviews in relevant literature provided the evidence.

VALUES

Content and recommendations were reviewed by the principal authors and the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Levels of evidence were judged as outlined by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

RECOMMENDATIONS