Squamous Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Around Dental Implants

What is the Incidence of Oral Cancer Recurrence in Patients Reconstructed With a Microvascular Free Flap, Endosseous Implants, and an Oral Prosthesis and How Does the Timing of Implant Placement Influence Recurrence?

PURPOSE

In patients with malignant oral disease, there is concern that immediate implant placement at the time of ablative and microvascular free flap surgery can contribute to tumor recurrence or delay the diagnosis of recurrence. The purpose of this study is to 1) estimate the incidence of recurrence in patients with malignant disease treated with immediate microvascular free flap reconstruction, endosseous implants, and an oral prosthesis, 2) measure and compare the timing of implant placement, immediate versus delayed, and the time to complete oral rehabilitation, and 3) measure the association between the timing of implant placement and tumor recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing medical record analysis involving patients with malignant oral cancer undergoing tumor resection and immediate microvascular reconstruction from 1996 to 2019 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN by the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Additional inclusion criteria comprised of immediate or delayed endosseous implant placement, the fabrication of an oral prosthesis, and a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, timing of implant placement and prosthesis loading, type of prosthesis, tumor recurrence, or second primary tumor events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with a mean follow-up of 6.4 years were included. Twenty-four patients (72.7%) were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma with 3 patients experiencing tumor recurrence. Fifteen patients had immediate implant placement while 18 patients had delayed implant placement. The mean number of days to prosthetic loading of the implants was 680.4 days and 330.1 days for the delayed implant group and immediate implant group, respectively, which was statistically significant (P = .004). The timing of implant placement and the event of a recurrence were not statistically significant (P = .075).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of recurrence in patients with malignant oral cancer treated with microvascular reconstruction, endosseous implants, and an oral prosthesis was 12.5% with one recurrence occurring beneath the oral prosthesis. Delayed implant placement resulted in a statistically significant delay in the completion of oral rehabilitation compared to immediate implant placement. There was no difference in the incidence of recurrence in the immediate implant group compared to the delayed implant group.

The role of computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3- dimensional printing in head and neck oncologic surgery: A review and future directions

Microvascular free flap reconstruction has remained the standard of care in reconstruction of large tissue defects following ablative head and neck oncologic surgery, especially for bony structures. Computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3-dimensionally (3D) printed models and devices offer novel solutions for reconstruction of bony defects. Conventional free hand techniques have been enhanced using 3D printed anatomic models for reference and pre-bending of titanium reconstructive plates, which has dramatically improved intraoperative and microvascular ischemia times. Improvements led to current state of the art uses which include full virtual planning (VP), 3D printed osteotomy guides, and patient specific reconstructive plates, with advanced options incorporating dental rehabilitation and titanium bone replacements into the primary surgical plan through use of these tools. Limitations such as high costs and delays in device manufacturing may be mitigated with in house software and workflows. Future innovations still in development include printing custom prosthetics, 'bioprinting' of tissue engineered scaffolds, integration of therapeutic implants, and other possibilities as this technology continues to rapidly advance. This review summarizes the literature and serves as a summary guide to the historic, current, advanced, and future possibilities of 3D printing within head and neck oncologic surgery and bony reconstruction. This review serves as a summary guide to the historic, current, advanced, and future roles of CAD/CAM and 3D printing within the field of head and neck oncologic surgery and bony reconstruction.

Cancerous lesions in the vicinity of dental implants: a systematic review

Introduction: The massive diffusion of dental implant treatments in the last decades leads to the appearance of complications, most of them inflammatory, although important complications have been described as malignant lesions in the vicinity of dental implants. The objective of this article is to describe the cases described in the literature of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or clinical variants and metastases, in the vicinity of dental implants and to analyze the possible etiological agents involved. Material and methods: The criteria used were those described in the PRISMA® Declaration for performing systematic reviews. An electronic search was performed on MEDLINE (via PubMed) using the terms MeSH: “dental implants” AND “squamous cell carcinoma” OR “dental implant complications” AND “squamous cell carcinoma”. Results: Thirty-eight articles describing a total of 76 cases of OSCC or clinical variants, as well as metastasis in the vicinity of dental implants, were included. Conclusions: It is not possible to establish a cause-effect relationship between dental implants and the development of OSCC. Its clinical appearance can be confused with periimplantitis, so that, in cases of sudden onset, which do not respond to conventional treatment and/or have associated alterations in sensitivity, a biopsy should be performed.

Oral Cancer around Dental Implants Appearing in Patients with\without a History of Oral or Systemic Malignancy: a Systematic Review

Objectives

The purpose of this article is to systematically review the circumstance of oral cancer around osseointegrated dental implants.

Material and Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted through the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases. The search was restricted for articles published during the last 21 years from January 1996 to April 2017 and articles were limited to English language.

Results

A total of 35 articles were reviewed, and 19 of the most relevant articles that are suitable to the criteria were selected. Case reports were analysed when oral cancer was present in patients with dental implants. Finally, the present data included 28 patients.

Conclusions

A direct link between dental implants and oral cancer was not found. It was observed that there were no significant differences in number of incidences of oral cancer between patients with history of malignancy and those without. More research should be made to document such cases. It was noticed that in many cases oral cancer around dental implant present itself as peri-implantitis, correct differential diagnosis is essential in such cases.

Survival of dental implants in patients with oral cancer treated by surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study

Background

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants placed after ablative surgery, in patients affected by oral cancer treated with or without radiotherapy.

Methods

We collected data for 34 subjects (22 females, 12 males; mean age: 51 ± 19) with malignant oral tumors who had been treated with ablative surgery and received dental implant rehabilitation between 2007 and 2012. Postoperative radiation therapy (less than 50 Gy) was delivered before implant placement in 12 patients. A total of 144 titanium implants were placed, at a minimum interval of 12 months, in irradiated and non-irradiated residual bone.

Results

Implant loss was dependent on the position and location of the implants (P = 0.05–0.1). Moreover, implant survival was dependent on whether the patient had received radiotherapy. This result was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). Whether the implant was loaded is another highly significant (P < 0.01) factor determining survival. We observed significantly better outcomes when the implant was not loaded until at least 6 months after placement.

Conclusions

Although the retrospective design of this study could be affected by selection and information biases, we conclude that a delayed loading protocol will give the best chance of implant osseointegration, stability and, ultimately, effective dental rehabilitation.

Evaluation of the Effects of Dental Implants on Oral Lesions

Objective

To determine whether dental implants impress oral lesions, and to evaluate the nature of their effect on the lesions.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive search was done via Google and PubMed for articles (including case reports and literature reviews) containing the keywords ‘oral squamous cell carcinoma’ (OSCC), ‘oral lichen planus’ (OLP), ‘lichenoid contact reaction’ (LCR), ‘osseointegrated implants’, and ‘dental implants’, in the last 10 years (2002-2012).

Results

The study included 24 articles involving patients with dental implants, and some oral lesions (e.g. oral lichen planus and oral squamous cell carcinoma) or with a history of lesions. In these publications, there is evidence suggesting the possibility of emergence, exacerbation, recurrence, or even malignant transformation of the oral lesions after implant placement in some cases.

Conclusion

Based on our review of the literature, implant treatment does not seem to be completely safe under any circumstances, but may have some complications in subjects with certain diseases (e.g. oral lesions, autoimmune diseases, malignancies, allergic reactions, etc.). Therefore prior to treatment, patients should be fully informed of the risks.

Clinical significance

Implant treatment is best done with caution in patients with cancer or mucocutaneous disorders.

How to cite this article

Agha-Hosseini F, Rohani B. Evaluation of the Effects of Dental Implants on Oral Lesions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5):400-406.

The influence of radiation therapy on dental implantology

Patients with a history of head and neck cancer resection require extensive prosthodontic rehabilitation following cancer treatment. The oral anatomy drastically changes from ablative therapy, and the oral tissue response becomes altered as a consequence of radiation and chemotherapy. Successful restoration of oral function in this specific patient population was increasingly difficult before the widespread use of dental implants. Implant-borne prosthetics are now often used. However, surgical guidelines remain unclear with regard to oncology-related parameters. In this article, guidelines are introduced for implant therapy in the cancer patients according to radiation dosage and timing. Indications for hyperbaric oxygen treatment are highlighted along with risk assessment associated with implant placement. These guidelines are intended to augment knowledge obtained through oncology consultation; moreover, provide a rationale for implant therapy within the course of cancer treatment.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma arising around osseointegrated dental implants

PURPOSE

This literature review investigates the occurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) around osseointegrated dental implants (DI).

METHODS

Databases were searched from 1989 up to and including November 2011. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) original studies, (2) clinical studies and case reports, (3) reference lists of the relevant original and review articles, (4) intervention: occurrence of OSSC around osseointegrated DI, and (5) articles published only in English language.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. In nine studies, the dental implant patients with diagnosed OSCC had previously been exposed to cancer. In five studies, the patients presented with a history of habitual tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption.

CONCLUSION

OSCC is more likely to arise around osseointegrated DI in patients with a previous history of cancer. However, the role of other factors including tobacco and alcohol usage cannot be disregarded.

Updated clinical considerations for dental implant therapy in irradiated head and neck cancer patients

An increasing number of reports indicate successful use of dental implants (DI) during oral rehabilitation for head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumor surgery and radiation therapy. Implant-supported dentures are a viable option when patients cannot use conventional dentures due to adverse effects of radiation therapy, including oral dryness or fragile mucosa, in addition to compromised anatomy; however, negative effects of radiation, including osteoradionecrosis, are well documented in the literature, and early loss of implants in irradiated bone has been reported. There is currently no consensus concerning DI safety or clinical guidelines for their use in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. It is important for health care professionals to be aware of the multidimensional risk factors for these patients when planning oral rehabilitation with DIs, and to provide optimal treatment options and maximize the overall treatment outcome. This paper reviews and updates the impact of radiotherapy on DI survival and discusses clinical considerations for DI therapy in irradiated head and neck cancer patients.

Dental implants in oral cancer reconstruction

Endosseous implants have revolutionized dental prosthetic rehabilitation, providing a reliable, a stable, and an aesthetic option for dental reconstruction. Dental implants have similarly improved the functionality of reconstructions following cancer surgery. The use of dental implants in oral cancer reconstruction can be divided into 2 categories: (1), for retention of a prosthetic device, for example, palatal obturator, used as the primary means of maxillary reconstruction, and (2), for dental rehabilitation after bony reconstruction of the jaws. This article discusses these different uses of endosseous implants in patients with head and neck cancer.

Dental implants in oral cancer reconstruction

Endosseous implants have revolutionized dental prosthetic rehabilitation, providing a reliable, a stable, and an aesthetic option for dental reconstruction. Dental implants have similarly improved the functionality of reconstructions following cancer surgery. The use of dental implants in oral cancer reconstruction can be divided into 2 categories: (1), for retention of a prosthetic device, for example, palatal obturator, used as the primary means of maxillary reconstruction, and (2), for dental rehabilitation after bony reconstruction of the jaws. This article discusses these different uses of endosseous implants in patients with head and neck cancer.