A 3-Dimensional Approach for Analysis in Orthognathic Surgery—Using Free Software for Voxel-Based Alignment and Semiautomatic Measurement

Evaluating a modified proximal segment manipulation technique in sagittal split osteotomy for correcting facial asymmetry: outcomes and risk factors for Menton horizontal relapse

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and stability of a modified overlap method for manipulating proximal segments (PSs) during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correcting facial asymmetry and to identify risk factors contributing to Menton horizontal relapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study involved 62 consecutive adults with class III asymmetry who underwent bimaxillary surgery. Patients were classified in two groups according to surgical techniques: the overlap group (n = 31), in which the non-deviated PS was flared outward before aligning with the distal segment (DS), and the conventional group (n = 31), in which the PSs and DS were aligned in maximum contact. Computed tomographic scans were taken before surgery (T0), postoperative 1 week (T1) and 1 year (T2). Transverse ramus measurements and maxillo-mandibular segments movements were intergrouply compared. Correlations of Menton horizontal relapse with preoperative and intraoperative factors were also assessed.

RESULTS

From T1-T0, the overlap group showed greater reductions in discrepancies for gonial width (4.09 ± 3.49 mm) and coronal ramus angle (3.67° ± 3.44°) compared to the conventional group (1.76 ± 2.55 mm; 1.70° ± 3.16°) (p = 0.004, 0.023). From T2-T1, relapses in both groups were ≤ 2 mm and ≤ 2°. No correlation was found between surgical techniques and Menton horizontal relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The overlap method demonstrates effectiveness in correcting facial asymmetry, resulting in greater reductions in ramus discrepancies while maintaining mandibular stability one year postoperatively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For severe facial asymmetry, clinicians may consider using the overlap technique to enhance postoperative facial appearance.

Evaluating Surgical Accuracy in Bimaxillary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mandible-First versus Maxilla-First Approaches

BACKGROUND

Mandible-first surgery (MdFS) has gained attention as an alternative to the traditional maxilla-first surgery (MxFS) in bimaxillary procedures. Given the distinct sequence of operations between these approaches, evaluating the clinical advantages of MdFS compared to MxFS is crucial for optimizing surgical decision-making. This systematic review and meta-analysis examine intraoperative achievability and postoperative stability between these two surgical approaches.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and MEDLINE, covering articles published from 2013 to 2023. Studies included were retrospective, prospective, and randomized trials that compared the accuracy and/or stability of MdFS with MxFS. The primary endpoint for the meta-analysis was the standardized mean difference in surgical accuracy for translational movements, with a secondary focus on rotational accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies encompassing 712 patients met the inclusion criteria. The analysis suggested that MdFS might reduce accuracy in the sagittal dimension (CI, 0.05 to 0.74) but offered greater achievability in the vertical direction (CI, - 0.47 to - 0.07). Additionally, MdFS was associated with a relatively posterior (CI, - 1.18 to - 0.60) and inferior (CI, - 0.64 to - 0.07) positioning of the maxillomandibular complex.

CONCLUSION

Despite certain limitations, our findings indicate that MdFS can achieve clinical outcomes similar to MxFS in terms of both accuracy and stability. However, further researches with larger sample sizes and more rigorous study designs are necessary to validate these conclusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Evaluation of a Fully Digital, In-House Virtual Surgical Planning Workflow for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The advantages of virtual surgical planning (VSP) for orthognathic surgery are clear. Previous studies have evaluated in-house VSP; however, few fully digital, in-house protocols for orthognathic surgery have been studied.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between the virtual surgical plan and actual surgical outcome for orthognathic surgery using a fully digital, in-house VSP workflow.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This is a prospective cohort study from September 2020 to November 2022 of patients at the Victoria General Hospital in Halifax, NS, Canada who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Patients were excluded if they had previously undergone orthognathic surgery or were diagnosed with a craniofacial syndrome.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variables were the mean 3-dimensional (3D) (Euclidean) distance error, as well as mean error and mean absolute error in the transverse (x axis), vertical (y axis), and anterior-posterior (z axis) dimensions.

COVARIATES

Covariates included age, sex, and surgical sequence (mandible-first or maxilla-first).

ANALYSES

The primary outcome was tested using Z and t critical value confidence intervals. The P value was set at .05. The 3D distance error for mandible-first and maxilla-first groups was compared using a 2-sample t-test as well as analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The study sample included 52 subjects (24 males and 28 females) with a mean age of 27.7 (± 12.1) years. Forty three subjects underwent mandible-first surgery and 9 maxilla-first surgery. The mean absolute distance error was largest in the anterior-posterior dimension for all landmarks (except posterior nasal spine, left condyle, and gonion) and exceeded the threshold for clinical acceptability (2 mm) in 16 of 23 landmarks. Additionally, mean distance error in the anterior-posterior dimension was negative for all landmarks, indicating deficient movement in that direction. The effect of surgical sequence on 3D distance error was not statistically significant (P = .37).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In general, the largest contributor to mean 3D distance error was deficient movement in the anterior-posterior direction. Otherwise, mean absolute distance error in the vertical and transverse dimensions was clinically acceptable (< 2 mm). These findings were felt to be valuable for treatment planning purposes when using a fully digital, in-house VSP workflow.

What is the angular accuracy of regional voxel-based registration for segmental Le Fort I and genioplasty osteotomies?

Among the accuracy analysis techniques for orthognathic surgery, regional voxel-based registration (R-VBR) has robust data, but remains unvalidated for smaller jaw segments. The purpose of this study was to validate the angular accuracy of R-VBR for segmental Le Fort I (SLFI) and genioplasty osteotomies. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of consecutive patients with three-piece SLFI or genioplasties was rotated to a known pitch/roll/yaw (P/R/Y). Using R-VBR, a copy of the raw CBCT was superimposed onto the rotated CBCT at four mutual regions of interest (ROI): anterior, right posterior, and left posterior maxilla, and chin. The P/R/Y of each was subtracted from those of the rotated CBCT to calculate the angular error. The predictor and outcome variables were ROI and absolute angular error, respectively. The accuracy threshold was 0.5°. Ten SLFI and 34 genioplasties were analyzed based on the sample size calculation. The one-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were applied in the analysis. The mean absolute error was 0.20-0.54° for the maxillary segments (all P ≤ 0.01) and 0.83-2.51° for the genioplasty segments (all P < 0.001). R-VBR has variable angular accuracy for SLFI osteotomies and may be insufficient for genioplasty. The findings may allow the design and interpretation of studies on SLFI and genioplasty with greater rigor, thereby contributing to minimizing the discrepancy between planned and achieved outcomes.

OrthoCalc: The six degrees of freedom measurement workflow of rotational and displacement changes for maxilla positioning evaluation

BACKGROUND

This study is undertaken to establish the accuracy and reliability of OrthoCalc, a 3D application designed for the evaluation of maxillary positioning.

METHODS

We registered target virtual planned models, maxillary models from pre-operative and post-operative CT scans, and post-operative intra-oral scans to a common reference system, allowing for digital evaluation. To assess rotational changes, we introduced a novel measurement method based on virtual cuboid models. Displacement errors were calculated based on proposed registration matrices. We also compared OrthoCalc to established commercial medical software as a benchmark.

RESULTS

Statistical significance calculated showed no significant differences between OrthoCalc and commercial software. the biggest error of 0.04 degree in rotation change was found in the yaw. A maximum displacement change of 0.75 mm was found in the X direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study validates OrthoCalc as a precise and reliable tool for assessing maxillary position changes with six degrees of freedom in orthognathic surgery, endorsing its clinical utility.

Validation of a fully automatic three-dimensional assessment of orthognathic surgery

The aim of the present study was to propose and validate FAST3D: a fully automatic three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the surgical accuracy and the long-term skeletal stability of orthognathic surgery. To validate FAST3D, the agreement between FAST3D and a validated state-of-the-art semi-automatic method was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at a 95 % confidence interval. A one-sided hypothesis test was performed to evaluate whether the absolute discrepancy between the measurements produced by the two methods was statistically significantly below a clinically relevant error margin of 0.5 mm. Ten subjects (six male, four female; mean age 24.4 years), class II and III, who underwent a combined three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were included in the validation study. The agreement between the two methods was excellent for all measurements, ICC range (0.85-1.00), and fair for the rotational stability of the chin, ICC = 0.54. The absolute discrepancy for all measurements was statistically significantly lower than the clinical relevant error margin (p < 0.008). Within the limitations of the present validation study, FAST3D demonstrated to be reliable and may be adopted whenever appropriate in order to reduce the work load of the medical staff.

Enhancing skeletal stability and Class III correction through active orthodontist engagement in virtual surgical planning: A voxel-based 3-dimensional analysis

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgical correction of Class III malocclusion was investigated through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the distal and proximal mandibular segments using a 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition among virtual surgical predictions performed by the orthodontist in close communication with the maxillofacial surgeon and 12-18 months postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive secondary data analysis was conducted on deidentified preoperative (1 month before surgery [T1]) and 12-18 months postoperative (midterm [T2]) cone-beam computed tomography scans, along with virtual surgical planning (VSP) data obtained by Dolphin Imaging software. The sample for the study consisted of 17 patients (mean age, 24.8 ± 3.5 years). Using 3D Slicer software, automated tools based on deep-learning approaches were used for cone-beam computed tomography orientation, registration, bone segmentation, and landmark identification. Colormaps were generated for qualitative analysis, whereas linear and angular differences between the planned (T1-VSP) and observed (T1-T2) outcomes were calculated for quantitative assessments. Statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level of α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The midterm surgical outcomes revealed a slight but significantly less maxillary advancement compared with the planned position (mean difference, 1.84 ± 1.50 mm; P = 0.004). The repositioning of the mandibular distal segment was stable, with insignificant differences in linear (T1-VSP, 1.01 ± 3.66 mm; T1-T2, 0.32 ± 4.17 mm) and angular (T1-VSP, 1.53° ± 1.60°; T1-T2, 1.54° ± 1.50°) displacements (P >0.05). The proximal segments exhibited lateral displacement within 1.5° for both the mandibular right and left ramus at T1-VSP and T1-T2 (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of fully digital planned and surgically repositioned maxilla and mandible revealed excellent precision. In the midterm surgical outcomes of maxillary advancement, a minor deviation from the planned anterior movement was observed.

Accuracy and stability of the condyle position after orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and stability of condylar positioning in patients treated with bimaxillary procedures compared with patients treated with maxillary procedures alone. All patients had undergone treatment at Odense University Hospital and were treated with inferior maxillary procedures. The primary outcome was changes in condyle position and the primary predictor variable was time: pre-operative (T0) measurements to 1-week post-operative (T1) and 1-year post-operative (T2) measurements. Condyle movement was measured using dual voxel-based alignment. Sixteen patients were included. Seven patients underwent solitary maxillary procedure and 9 patients bimaxillary procedure. Bimaxillary procedures overall showed a condyle positional change in pitch from T0 to T1 and T1 to T2 compared to maxillary procedures alone. Condylar translation was stable despite large differences in positioning. Compared to solitary maxillary procedures, bimaxillary procedures showed a statistically significant anterocranial rotation at 1-week follow-up movement (3.95° vs. -0.95°; SD 3,74 vs 1,05; P value = 0.000) and an additional statistically significant anterocranial movement at 1 year after surgery (4.89° vs 0.60°; SD 3,82 vs 0,92; P value = 0.000). In conclusion a need for greater anterocranial stability of the sagittal split osteotomy than that provided by 3 bicortically fixated screws alone might be indicated.

Remodeling of the Temporomandibular Joint After Mandibular Setback Surgery: A 3D Cephalometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Condylar adaptations following orthognathic surgery remain an area of interest. Prior studies do not use 3-dimensional imaging modalities and lack standardization in the choice of osteotomy and movement when assessing condylar changes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to use 3-dimensional cephalometry to measure the association between osteotomy type (sagittal split osteotomy [SSO] vs vertical ramus osteotomy [VRO]) and changes in condylar volume and position.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

This is a retrospective cohort study from January 2021 through December 2022 of patients at Bellevue Hospital in New York City, New York who were treated with either SSO or VRO for the correction of Class III skeletal malocclusion.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

The primary predictor was the type of mandibular osteotomy, sagittal split osteotomy, and vertical ramus osteotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcomes were changes in condylar volume (change measured in mm3) and relative position (anterior-posterior change utilizing the Pullinger and Hollinder method).

COVARIATES

Covariates included patient age, sex, setback magnitude, temporomandibular joint symptoms, and fixation method for SSO patients.

ANALYSES

Univariate comparisons were performed between independent variables and study outcomes. Volume changes were compared within each predictor using paired t-tests. Position changes were compared within each predictor using χ2 tests. If there were multiple significant univariate predictors, multiple regression models were created to predict volume and position changes. A P < .05 value was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final sample comprised 30 condyles derived from 30 subjects. Mean age was 22.7 years (SD = 5.7) and mean setback was 3.9 mm (SD = 0.9). Twenty two condyles (73.3%) were subject to SSO with fixation, while the remaining 8 (26.7%) condyles were subject to intraoral VRO without fixation. When compared to VRO, condyles manipulated with SSO had greater volume loss (-177.2 vs -60.9 mm3; P = .03) and positional change (68.2 vs 12.5%; P < .01). Self-reported measures of postoperative pain, internal derangement, and myofascial symptoms were not significantly associated with either volume or positional changes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The SSO resulted in greater postoperative condylar volume loss and positional changes. These volume and positional changes were not correlated with self-reported temporomandibular disorder symptoms.

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Skeletal Stability following Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach: Validation of a Simple and Effective Method

Background  The three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of skeletal stability after orthognathic surgery is a time-consuming and complex procedure. The complexity increases further when evaluating the surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFOA). Herein, we propose and validate a simple time-saving method of 3D analysis using a single software, demonstrating high accuracy and repeatability. Methods  This retrospective cohort study included 12 patients with skeletal class 3 malocclusion who underwent bimaxillary surgery without any presurgical orthodontics. Computed tomography (CT)/cone-beam CT images of each patient were obtained at three different time points (preoperation [T0], immediately postoperation [T1], and 1 year after surgery [T2]) and reconstructed into 3D images. After automatic surface-based alignment of the three models based on the anterior cranial base, five easily located anatomical landmarks were defined to each model. A set of angular and linear measurements were automatically calculated and used to define the amount of movement (T1-T0) and the amount of relapse (T2-T1). To evaluate the reproducibility, two independent observers processed all the cases, One of them repeated the steps after 2 weeks to assess intraobserver variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated at a 95% confidence interval. Time required for evaluating each case was recorded. Results  Both the intra- and interobserver variability showed high ICC values (more than 0.95) with low measurement variations (mean linear variations: 0.18 mm; mean angular variations: 0.25 degree). Time needed for the evaluation process ranged from 3 to 5 minutes. Conclusion  This approach is time-saving, semiautomatic, and easy to learn and can be used to effectively evaluate stability after SFOA.

What Is the Linear Accuracy of Regional Voxel-Based Registration for Orthognathic Surgery Landmarks?

PURPOSE

While regional voxel-based registration (R-VBR) has been shown to have excellent reproducibility and angular accuracy, there are limited data on the linear accuracy of R-VBR for common orthognathic surgery landmarks, or on whether angular accuracy correlates with linear accuracy. The purpose of this study was to estimate the linear accuracy of R-VBR for several skeletal landmarks commonly used in orthognathic surgical planning, and to measure the correlation between angular and linear discrepancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients treated at a single center with nonsegmental LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy surgery from January 2019 to November 2020. Cone beam computed tomography at the preoperative (T0) and immediate postoperative (T1) stages were analyzed to measure the postoperative positional changes of 11 orthognathic landmarks in 4 regions of interest (ROI) using R-VBR performed twice by two examiners. Pairwise correlation analysis and canonical correlation analysis were performed for the angular discrepancies (primary predictor variable) and the linear discrepancies (primary outcome variable) to measure the correlation between the two.

RESULTS

In cone beam computed tomography analysis of 28 eligible subjects (16 males, 12 females; mean age 18.9 years, range 15 to 25), the mean absolute (MA) angular discrepancies ranged from 0.15° to 0.55°, while the corresponding MA linear discrepancies ranged from 0.05 to 0.41 mm. There was a strong correlation between angular and linear discrepancies that was statistically significant (P = .001 to .04, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.38 to 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

For nonsegmental LeFort I osteotomies and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, R-VBR has excellent linear accuracy within a single voxel size (0.3 mm) for commonly used orthognathic landmarks in the maxillary and distal mandibular ROI. The MA linear discrepancy for the proximal mandibular segment ROI was greater than a single voxel size, with a maximum of 0.41 mm.

Evaluation of postoperative changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using balanced orthognathic surgery system

Background

Many studies on maintaining the condyle in a normal or anatomical position during orthognathic surgery have been conducted to stabilize surgical outcomes and prevent iatrogenic temporomandibular joint complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the balanced orthognathic surgery (BOS) system.

Methods

Postoperative changes in condylar position were retrospectively evaluated in 22 condyles of 11 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the BOS system. The center point coordinates of the condylar head before and after orthognathic surgery were analyzed using voxel-based registration.

Results

Changes in the condylar position mainly occurred downward in the y-axis (−1.09 ± 0.62 mm) (P < 0.05). The change in the x-axis (0.02 ± 0.68 mm) and z-axis (0.01 ± 0.48 mm) showed no significant difference between before and after orthognathic surgery.

Conclusion

These results indicate that the changes in the condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the BOS system mainly occurred downward in the y-axis, with slight changes in the x- and z-axes. The change in the condylar position after orthognathic surgery using the BOS system is clinically acceptable.

Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review was performed to analyze the current evidence on three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) superimposition protocols used to assess dentomaxillofacial changes after orthognathic and orthofacial surgery. Accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency were evaluated.

METHODS

The search was divided into Main Search (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and SciELO), Grey Literature search (Google Scholar and Open Grey), and Manual search. Thirteen studies were included. Of these, 10 reported data on accuracy, 10 on reproducibility and five on efficiency. Seven proposed or evaluated methods of voxel-based superimposition, three focused on the surface-based technique, one compared surface- and voxel-based superimposition protocols, one used the maximum mutual information algorithm, and one described a landmark-based superimposition method. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was the most common imaging technique, being used in 10 studies.

RESULTS

The accuracy of most methods was high, showing mean differences smaller than voxels' dimensions, ranging between 0.05 and 1.76 mm for translational accuracy, and 0.10-1.09° for rotational accuracy. The overall reproducibility was considered good as demonstrated by the small mean error (range: 0.01-0.26 mm) and high correlation coefficients (range: 0.53-1.00). Timing to complete virtual superimposition techniques ranged between a few seconds up to 40 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Voxel-based superimposition protocols presented the highest accuracy and reproducibility. Moreover, superimposition protocols that used automated processes and involved only one software were the most efficient.

A semi-automatic approach for longitudinal 3D upper airway analysis using voxel-based registration

OBJECTIVES

To propose and validate a reliable semi-automatic approach for three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the upper airway (UA) based on voxel-based registration (VBR).

METHODS

Post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 10 orthognathic surgery patients were superimposed to the pre-operative CBCT scans by VBR using the anterior cranial base as reference. Anatomic landmarks were used to automatically cut the UA and calculate volumes and cross-sectional areas (CSA). The 3D analysis was performed by two observers twice, at an interval of two weeks. Intraclass correlations and Bland-Altman plots were used to quantify the measurement error and reliability of the method. The relative Dahlberg error was calculated and compared with a similar method based on landmark re-identification and manual measurements.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability (ICC ≥ 0.995). Bland-Altman plots showed good observer agreement, low bias and no systematic errors. The relative Dahlberg error ranged between 0.51 and 4.30% for volume and 0.24 and 2.90% for CSA. This was lower when compared with a similar, manual method. Voxel-based registration introduced 0.05-1.44% method error.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method was shown to have excellent reliability and high observer agreement. The method is feasible for longitudinal clinical trials on large cohorts due to being semi-automatic.

Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE): three-dimensional superimposition on cranial base

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate dental and skeletal changes caused by surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) using the superimposition of three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images on the cranial base.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective quasi-experiment before-and-after study using a convenience sample. Twenty-four adult patients (13 male and 11 female) were evaluated before SARPE (T0), immediately after expansion (T1), and after 6 months of retention (T2). CBCT scans were superimposed on the anterior cranial base using voxel-based registration. Measurements from different reference points were used for comparisons between times.

RESULTS

At T1, all teeth had significant buccal tipping. At T2, most teeth remained in the same position as at T1, except the first premolar and the first molar, whose buccal roots moved slightly. The amount of bony expansion was 65 to 70% of the amount of tooth movement. The A point and maxillary incisors moved anteriorly from T0 to T1 and T2 (p < 0.0001). Inter-nasal distance had increased significantly at T1 (p < 0.0001) and remained stable at T2 (p = 0.478). No expansion was achieved at the zygomatic arch (p = 0.114).

CONCLUSION

SARPE promoted substantial buccal tipping of posterior teeth and some bone displacement; it also moved the maxilla and teeth forward and increased nasal width.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

No other clinical studies have evaluated dental and skeletal changes caused by SARPE using superimposition of 3D CBCT images on the cranial base. This study findings may help clinical dentists plan treatments using safe and reliable information.

What Do We Know Beyond Reliability in Voxel-Based Registration? Validation of the Accuracy of Regional Voxel-Based Registration (R-VBR) Techniques for Orthognathic Surgery Analysis

PURPOSE

Despite having excellent reproducibility, the accuracy of regional voxel-based registration (R-VBR) techniques used for postoperative orthognathic surgical analysis has not been validated. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of R-VBR.

METHODS

Preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of consecutive patients treated at a single center with nonsegmental LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy were included. T1 CBCTs were oriented to match that of the standardized T0, and thus were assigned a known rotational transformation matrix in pitch/roll/yaw (P/R/Y), to create T1'. A copy of T1 (cT1) was made and was superimposed to T1' using R-VBR for 4 regions of interest (ROI): maxilla, distal mandible, right proximal mandible, and left proximal mandible, to create cT1'. The transformation matrix for each of the ROI was compared to those of T1' using paired t test and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight eligible subjects' CBCTs were analyzed. Mean difference between T1' and cT1' ranged from -0.08 to 0.14° (maximum 0.73°), with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.216 to 1). Mean absolute difference ranged from 0.13 to 0.31° (maximum 0.73°). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between T1' and cT1', indicating excellent accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

R-VBR using the maxilla, distal mandible, and the bilateral proximal mandibular segments as ROI has excellent accuracy in terms of rotational measurements.

Virtual Analysis of Segmental Bimaxillary Surgery: A Validation Study

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) assessment of orthognathic surgery is often time consuming, relies on manual re-identification of anatomical landmarks or is limited to non-segmental osteotomies. The purpose of the present study was to propose and validate an automated approach for 3D assessment of the accuracy and postoperative outcome of segmental bimaxillary surgery.

METHODS

A semi-automatic approach was developed and validated for virtual surgical analysis (VSA) of segmental bimaxillary surgery using a pair of pre- and postoperative (2 weeks) cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans. The output of the VSA, the accuracy of the surgical outcome, was calculated as 3D translational and rotational differences between the planned and postoperative movements of the individual bone segments. To evaluate the reliability of the proposed VSA, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated at a 95% confidence interval on measurements of 2 observers. The VSA was deemed reliable if the ICC was excellent (> 0.80) and the absolute difference of the repeated intra- and inter-observer translational and rotational measurements were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than a hypothesized clinical relevant threshold of 1 voxel (0.45 mm) and 1 degree, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 10 subjects (6 male; 4 women; mean age 24.4 years) with skeletal class 2 and 3, who underwent segmental bimaxillary surgery, 3-piece Le Fort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were recruited. The intra- and inter-observer reliability was excellent, ICC range [0.96 - 1.00]. The range of the mean absolute difference of the repeated intra- and inter-observer translational and rotational measurements were [0.07 mm (0.05) - 0.20 mm (0.19)] and [0.11˚ (0.08) - 0.63˚ (0.42)], respectively. This was significantly lower than the hypothesized clinical relevant thresholds (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The validation showed that the VSA has excellent reliability for quantitative assessment of the postoperative outcome and accuracy of segmental bimaxillary surgery.

Validation of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0-3D accuracy assessment tool for bimaxillary surgery and genioplasty

Orthognathic surgery is a widely performed procedure to correct dentofacial deformities. Virtual treatment planning is an important preparation step. One advantage of the use of virtual treatment planning is the possibility to assess the accuracy of orthognathic surgery. In this study, a tool (OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0), which allows for quantification of the accuracy of orthognathic surgery, is presented and validated. In the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0 the accuracy of the osseous chin can now be assessed which was not possible in the earlier version of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser. 30 patients who underwent bimaxillary surgery in combination with a genioplasty were selected from three different centers in the Netherlands. A pre-operative (CB)CT scan, virtual treatment planning and postoperative (CB)CT scan were required for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery. The preoperative and postoperative (CB)CT scans were aligned using voxel-based matching. Furthermore, voxel-based matching was used to align the pre-operative maxilla, mandible and rami towards their postoperative position whereas surface-based matching was used for aligning the pre-operative chin towards the postoperative position. The alignment resulted in a transformation matrix which contained the achieved translations and rotations. The achieved translations and rotations can be compared to planning values of the virtual treatment plan. To study the reproducibility, two independent observers processed all 30 patients to assess the inter-observer variability. One observer processed the patients twice to assess the intra-observer variability. Both the intra- and inter-observer variability showed high ICC values (> 0.92) and low measurement variations (< 0.673±0.684mm and < 0.654±0.824°). The results of this study show that the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0 has an excellent reproducibility for quantification of skeletal movements between two (CB)CT scans.

Virtually-Planned Orthognathic Surgery Achieves an Accurate Condylar Position

PURPOSE

Accuracy in orthognathic surgery with virtual planning has been reported, but detailed analysis of accuracy according to anatomic location, including the mandibular condyle, is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to compare the virtual plan and surgical outcomes and analyze the degree and distribution of errors according to each anatomic location.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated skeletal class III patients, treated with bimaxillary surgery. The primary predictor was anatomic locations that consisted of right and left condyles, maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. Other variables were age and gender. The primary outcome was surgical accuracy, defined as mean 3-dimensional distance error, mean absolute error, and mean error along the horizontal, vertical, and anteroposterior axes between the virtual plan and surgical outcomes. Landmarks were compared using a computational method based on affine transformation with a 1-time landmark setting. The mean errors were visualized with multidimensional scattergrams. Bivariate and regression statistics were computed.

RESULTS

This study included 52 patients, 26 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 21 years and 3 months. The mean 3D distance errors for condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were 1.03, 1.25, and 2.24 mm, respectively. Condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and the landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were positioned at 0.49 mm inferior, 0.28 mm anterior, and 1.25 mm inferior, respectively. The landmark errors for the distal segment of the mandible exhibited a wider distribution than those for condylar and maxillary landmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between the planned and actual outcome aided by virtual surgical planning was highest for the condyles, followed by the maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. It is important to consider the tendency for surgical errors in each anatomic location during operations.

Accuracy and reliability of voxel-based dentoalveolar registration (VDAR) in orthognathic surgical patients: a pilot study with two years' follow-up

The purpose of this study was to validate the applicability of using maxillary voxel-based dentoalveolar registration (VDAR) at long-term follow up in orthognathic surgical patients. A retrospective sample of 25 patients (skeletal class II or III) who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery was recruited and divided into two groups. Group A included 15 patients (seven females, eight males, mean (SD) age 25.8 (14.4) years) with unrestored dentition and group B involved 10 patients (five females, five males, mean (SD) age: 26.2 (11.9) years) with dental restorative treatment. Postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired at four time-points, one to six weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3) and two years (T4). Voxel- based registration was applied using the cranial base and then complete dental segment with part of the alveolar bone at T1-T2, T1-T3 and T1-T4 time-intervals. The translational and rotational accuracy and reproducibility of the registered maxillary segment was evaluated at these three intervals by analysing the transformation matrix using singular value decomposition. All translational and rotational measurements showed excellent reliability in both groups without any significant difference. The combined translational and rotational difference was found to be within the clinically acceptable range of 2mm and 4°. The VDAR was found to be accurate and reliable to be utilised for a long-term skeletal follow-up in orthognathic surgical patients.

Accuracy of orthognathic surgery with customized titanium plates-Systematic review

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the accuracy of customized titanium plates in orthognathic surgery compared to standard outcome in virtual surgical planning. PRISMA and JBI guidelines were followed. Research protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Six databases and two gray literature repositories were used as sources of research articles. Descriptive clinical studies, that performed orthognathic surgery using custom titanium plates, were included. Risk of bias was assessed by "The Joanna-Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in Systematic Reviews Checklist for Case Series". Of the 11,916 studies initially identified, seven met the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2015 and 2019. Most of the studies (57%) had a low risk of bias, while one had a high risk of bias. Total sample included 74 patients with 63 bimaxillary surgeries and 11 unimaxillary surgeries. All studies showed acceptable accuracy within previously established clinical parameters. Although the eligible articles assessed the accuracy of the orthognathic surgery with respect to virtual planning, the wide variability of evaluation methodologies made it impossible to calculate a combined accuracy measure. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis, so a pragmatic recommendation on the use of these plates is not possible.

Three-dimensional characterisation of the globe position in the orbit

PURPOSE

Current methods to analyse the globe position, including Hertel exophthalmometry and computed tomography (CT), are limited to the axial plane and require the lateral orbital rim and cornea as landmarks. This pilot study aimed to design a method to measure the position of the globe in the axial, coronal and sagittal plane and independent from orbital bony and corneal references.

METHODS

With the aid of three-dimensional CT reconstruction technology, we determined the globe position in the orbit based on the centre of the globe. Method validation was performed using data of consecutive orbital CT scans from the control group and from the patients with Graves' orbitopathy who underwent orbital decompression surgery with removal of the lateral orbital margin.

RESULTS

The inter- and intra-observer reliability was excellent with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (> 0.99, 95% CI [0.97; 1.00]). In the decompressed orbits, there was a statistically significant globe position shift along the anterior-posterior axis (P = 0.0005, 95% CI [0.63; 3.66]), but not along the medial-lateral and superior-inferior axis.

CONCLUSION

The 3D CT method can accurately and reliably characterise the globe position shift in the three dimensions without using orbital and corneal anatomical landmarks. The method can be useful to determine the globe shift in proptosis, enophthalmos, hypoglobus and hyperglobus, even in the presence of strabismus and orbital bone defects.

Inferior Maxillary Repositioning Remains Stable 1 Year After Surgery but Entails a High Risk of Osteosynthesis Failure

PURPOSE

Inferior maxillary repositioning has continued to be among the most unstable orthognathic procedures. The overall purpose of the present study was to measure skeletal stability after inferior maxillary repositioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We implemented a retrospective cohort study. The study cohort was derived from all orthognathic patients who had undergone treatment from January 2011 to December 2013 in Odense University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were orthognathic surgery with inferior maxillary repositioning in patients without maxillary segmentation or cleft lip/palate. The exclusion criteria were nonattendance at follow-up visits or requiring reoperation before the 1-year follow-up point. The primary predictor variable was the time from the 1-week follow-up examination to the 1-year follow-up examination. The primary outcome variable was maxillary skeletal movement. The other variables of interest were age, gender, preoperative occlusal relationship, maxillary movement obtained, and surgery type (mono- or bimaxillary procedure). Skeletal stability was measured at the centroid, anterior, and posterior nasal spines using the semiautomatic measurement technique. Skeletal stability was clinically defined as less than 2 mm of movement in any direction. The positive directions for the 3 axes were right, anterior, and superior. The data were analyzed using mixed model linear regression analysis and 1-sample t tests.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were included in the present study (mean age, 28 years; female gender, 35%; bimaxillary surgery, 59%). Inferior maxillary repositioning was stable with less than 0.3 mm mean skeletal movement in any direction. Only 1 patient had experienced a relapse of more than 1 mm in the posterior direction; no movement exceeded 2 mm. However, 3 patients were excluded from the present analysis, because they had required reoperation during the first year after surgery for osteosynthesis failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior maxillary repositioning was stable during the first year after surgery; however, the complication rate was high (15%). Thus, this procedure might still benefit from the use of more rigid patient-specific printed plates to increase postoperative stability.

How accurate is digital-assisted Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy? A three-dimensional perspective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical accuracy of Le Fort I surgery compared to the three-dimensional (3D) virtual planning. Fifty-five patients (29 males, 26 females; age range 15-58 years) with skeletal class III malocclusion, who underwent bimaxillary surgery were included. A validated 3D accuracy assessment tool was utilized to assess the surgical accuracy of the maxillary positioning. For translational movements, the least amount of error was associated with mediolateral translation, whereas the surgical accuracy for anteroposterior and superoinferior translation showed a tendency towards a more posterior and inferior positioning of the maxilla compared to the planning. For rotational movements, the highest discrepancy was observed for pitch. Linear regression showed increased inaccuracy with increasing advancement for anteroposterior, superoinferior and pitch movements. To conclude, 3D virtual planning of maxilla was generally accurate when compared to achieved outcome for skeletal class III patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery.

Does Mandible-First Sequencing Increase Maxillary Surgical Accuracy in Bimaxillary Procedures?

PURPOSE

In bimaxillary procedures, it is important to know how the chosen sequence affects the surgical outcome. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the theoretical advantages of using the mandible-first procedure were supported by clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective investigation on a cohort compiled from 3 published retrospective studies. The sample was composed of patients treated at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (Nijmegen, the Netherlands) from 2010 to 2014 and the Odense University Hospital (Odense, Denmark) from 2011 to 2015. The inclusion criterion was bimaxillary surgery without maxillary segmentation. The exclusion criterion was lack of a virtual surgical plan. The primary outcome variable was surgical accuracy, defined as the mean difference between the obtained outcome and the virtual surgical plan. The primary predictor variable was the comparison between mandible-first and maxilla-first sequencing. Secondary predictors were inferior maxillary repositioning and counterclockwise (CCW) rotation. The confounding variable was the virtually planned reposition. Results were analyzed by mixed-model regression encompassing all variables, followed by a detailed analysis of positive results using 2-sample t tests.

RESULTS

Overall, 145 patients were included for analysis (98 women; mean age, 28 years). Operating on the mandible first notably influenced maxillary positioning and placed the maxilla 1.5 mm posterior and with 1.4° of CCW rotation compared with virtual surgical planning. The interaction of surgical sequence with maxillary rotation showed similar surgical accuracy between maxilla-first surgery with clockwise rotation and mandible-first surgery with CCW rotation. Inferior maxillary repositioning resulted in the maxilla being placed 1.7 mm (maxilla-first sequence) and 2.0 mm (mandible-first sequence) posterior to the planned position.

CONCLUSION

Surgical accuracy was considerably influenced by sequencing in bimaxillary procedures. It remains important to know how the chosen sequence affects the surgical outcome so that the virtual surgical plan can be adjusted accordingly.

Patient-Specific Printed Plates Improve Surgical Accuracy In Vitro

PURPOSE

It remains unclear to what extent patient-specific printed plates can improve surgical outcomes in orthognathic procedures. This study aimed to quantify the surgical accuracy of patient-specific printed plates in vitro and to compare the results with patients' actual surgical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This in vitro study enrolled 20 postoperative orthognathic surgical patients, all treated with inferior maxillary repositioning. The preoperative midfaces were re-created in a 3-dimensionally printed model. The osteotomy and screw holes were placed at prespecified positions using a 3-dimensional guide. The dental segment was repositioned by means of the patient-specific plates. The primary outcome was the mean reposition at 3 dental reference points. The primary predictor variable was the obtained surgical reposition in vitro compared with the virtual surgical plan. Confounding variables were gender, age, occlusion, and bimaxillary surgery. The secondary outcome was surgical accuracy, and the secondary predictor was the in vitro outcomes versus the patients' surgical outcomes. Surgical accuracy was defined as the difference between the obtained reposition and the virtual surgical plan on a continuous scale. The differences were recorded in 3 dimensions according to the positive value of the 3 axes: right, anterior, and posterior. The results were analyzed using mixed-model regression and 1-sample t tests.

RESULTS

In the 20 patients (age, 18 to 64 years; 40% of patients were women), the mean planned reposition was 2.9 mm anterior and 1.8 mm inferior. In all models, the osteotomy edge was rounded off to position the plate in the predetermined position. Overall, the maxilla was positioned 0.5 mm anterior and 0.3 mm inferior to the planned position using patient-specific plates.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-specific plates positioned the maxilla in close approximation to the planned position without surgically relevant differences. The osteotomy edge must be carefully inspected for interference with the patient-specific plates to avoid displacement of the planned maxillary repositioning.