Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Pre-operative planning with X-PSI™ compared to MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

X-ray-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a new method for preoperative planning of TKA. This study presents the preliminary experiences with preoperative planning of TKA, comparing Zimmer Biomet's X-PSI™ with MRI-based planning for patient-specific instrumentation (PSI).

Methods

One high-volume experienced orthopedic surgeon modified and approved preoperative X-PSI™ and MRI-based PSI planning of 20 patients. Absolute differences in individual subjects of the planning by both modalities were evaluated for the following parameters: femoral- and tibial implant size, femoral resection (medial-distal, lateral-distal, medial-posterior, and lateral-posterior), tibial resection (medial and lateral), femoral flexion-extension angle, femoral- and tibial varus/valgus angle, posterior slope tibia, tibial rotation, and femoral- and tibial rotation.

Results

The planned implant size was within one size difference between X-PSI™ and MRI-based planning of the same patient in 95 % of cases for femoral implant size and 90 % of the cases for tibial implant size. Furthermore, femoral resection levels were more comparable between both imaging modalities, whereas more variation was seen between planned tibial resection levels.

Conclusion

This study presents a high agreement between X-PSI™ and MRI-based PSI in implant sizing and femoral resection levels, based on measurements within the same individuals, with greater variability observed in tibial resection. Further research is needed to validate and optimise PSI for TKA.

Laboratory validation of patient-specific templating for total knee arthroplasty

Patient-specific templating (PST), which is a sister procedure to patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) but hospital-based, is relatively less complex and less expensive than robotics and navigation. However, there are some concerns about the PST including the process of preoperative planning, 3D printing and material, positioning of PST intraoperatively, availability, and clinical value. The purpose of this study was to validate the technical accuracy and reliability of the PST technique in the lab and to report the outcomes of clinical application. To test the reliability of the PST technique, five observers positioned the PST templates five times over the distal femur and proximal tibial whilst a navigation system was used to measure the level of bone cutting, coronal and sagittal alignment, and rotation in both femur and tibia. The mean alignment error in all planes was 0.67° (maximum 2.5°). Concerning the bone (femoral and tibial) cutting, the mean error was 0.32 mm (maximum 1 mm). The qualitative and quantitative analysis showed an overall agreement between observers (p < 0.05). The laboratory part of this study showed that the positioning of the PST over the proximal tibia and distal femur during TKA is reliable. There were statistically insignificant intraobserver and interobserver variations.

Radiological Approach to Assessment of Lower-Limb Alignment-Coronal and Transverse Plane Analysis

Lower-limb alignment deformities constitute a significant clinical concern, as they can lead to serious complications, including progressive degenerative diseases and disabilities. Rotational deformities may give rise to conditions such as joint arthrosis, patellar instability, and the degeneration of the patellofemoral cartilage. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of lower-limb alignment is essential for the effective patient management, preoperative planning, and successful correction of these deformities. The primary assessment method employs full-length standing radiographs in the anteroposterior (AP) projection, which facilitates accurate measurements of the anatomical and mechanical axes of the lower limb, including angles and deviations. The outcomes of this analysis are vital for the meticulous planning of osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In addition, computed tomography (CT) provides a specialized approach for the precise evaluation of femoral and tibial rotation. In this area, there are potential opportunities for the implementation of AI-based automated measurement systems.

Micro Electromechanical System Navigation Assists Femoral Extramedullary Alignment Osteotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind Randomizing Study

OBJECTIVE

A micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) was developed based on spatial alignment and navigation technology to assist femoral extramedullary alignment osteotomy (FEAO) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The system can locate and adjust the femoral distal condylar osteotomy (FDCO) to obtain a better femoral prosthesis placement. It is a portable navigation device and provides an innovative approach for FDCO.

METHODS

Sixty patients who suffered from severe knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral TKA from May 14, 2021 to May 30, 2022 were randomly divided into a MEMS-FEAO group and a conventional femoral intramedullary alignment osteotomy (FIAO) group, with 30 cases in each group for a controlled retrospective study. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) of the lower limb was measured before and after surgery, the femoral valgus angle (FVA) was measured preoperatively, and the femoral prosthesis valgus angle (FPVA) and the femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA) were measured postoperatively following computed tomography imaging protocols. Measurement data is statistically described as mean ± standard deviation c. The count data is described by frequency (constituent ratio) using the rank sum test.

RESULT

A total of 6.7% (2/30) of FEAO compared to 20.0% (6/30) of FIAO cases were postoperative deviations where the HKAA exceeded ±3° of neutral alignment (p < 0.05). The postoperative HKAA was 178.74° ± 1.56° versus 176.64° ± 3.39° (p < 0.05), the HKAA deviation was 1.25° ± 1.56° versus 3.36° ± 3.40° (p < 0.05), and the FPFA was 4.85° ± 2.46° versus 6.60° ± 1.86°(p < 0.05). Therefore, the differences were all statistically significant between the two groups. However, the FPVA was -0.59° ± 2.73° versus -0.80° ± 2.85° (p > 0.05), and there was no statistical significance between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The MEMS-FEAO system can improve the accurate alignment and can be utilized as a locator to obtain the best femoral prosthesis placement in TKA and significantly reduce the rate of poor force line of the lower limb.

High accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study

PURPOSE

Over the last decade, robotic TKA gained popularity for improving the accuracy of implant positioning and reducing outliers in limb alignment comparing to conventional jig-based TKA. Hypothesis of this study was that this newly designed robotically assisted system will achieve a high level of accuracy for bone resection. Purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the system.

METHODS

For this study, 75 knees in 75 patients were operated using a new, robotic system (ROSA^® Knee System; Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) with a Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty (Persona^® Knee System). The planned, validated and measured angles and cuts for the distal and posterior femur, for the proximal tibia and for the final coronal alignment on long standing x-rays were compared.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found only between the average planned and the average validated angle for femoral flexion, tibial coronal axis, medial and lateral cuts; the average difference was in any case below 1 mm or under 1 degree with SD < 1. No statistical difference was found between planned validated and measured cuts. Average difference between planned HKA and measured was 1.2 ± 1.1. No statistically significant difference was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that using this new surgical robot in total knee arthroplasty it is possible to perform accurate bone cuts and to achieve the planned angles and resections.

Clinical outcomes after using patient specific instrumentation: is it worth the effort? A minimum 5-year retrospective review of 298 PSI knees

INTRODUCTION

Use of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) for performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to improve component positioning but there is dearth of evidence regarding clinical outcomes. The aim of our study was to report patient satisfaction and functional outcome scores of patients who underwent PSI TKAs at minimum 5 year follow up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected data of patients who underwent PSI TKAs between January 2012 and October 2015 under a single surgeon. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), patient satisfaction questionnaires, surgeon directed 3D planning changes and intra-operative changes were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 298 consecutive PSI TKAs performed on 249 patients at a mean age of 71 years (range: 49-93 years). On an average 4 changes were made for each knee during 3D planning compared to preliminary plan. Intra-operative implant size change was required only in 3% (10 knees). The PROM scores were collected at a mean follow-up period of 6.8 years (range: 5.0-8.6 years) for 224 knees. Oxford Knee Score improved from median pre-operative score of 18 (IQR: 13-24) to median post-operative score of 44 (IQR: 40-47) with a median gain of 23 (IQR: 16-30). The median modified Forgotten Joint Score was 87.5 (IQR: 54.4-98.1). For the Beverland questionnaire, 75% (n = 166) reported being "Very Happy" and only 4% (n = 9/222) were 'Never Happy'.

CONCLUSION

Excellent patient satisfaction and functional scores at mid-term can be achieve d using PSI technique to perform TKA with careful surgeon directed pre-operative planning.

Patient-specific instrumentation makes sense in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery was initially developed to increase accuracy. The potential PSI benefits have expanded in the last decade, and other advantages have been published. However, different authors are critical of PSI and argue that the advantages are not such and do not compensate for the extra cost. This article aims to describe the recently published advantages and disadvantages of PSI.

AREAS COVERED

Narrative description of the latest publications related to PSI in accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, efficiency, and other benefits.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

We have published high accuracy of the system, with a not clinically relevant loss of accuracy, significantly higher precision with PSI than with conventional instruments, and a high percentage of cases in the optimal range and similar to that obtained with computer-assisted navigation, greater imprecision for tibial slope, a significant blood loss reduction, and time consumption, an acceptable and non-significant increase in the cost per procedure and no difference in complications during hospital admission and at 90 days. We think that PSI will not follow the Scott Parabola and that it will continue to be a valuable type of device in some instances of TKA surgery.

Surgeon Dominated Design Can Improve the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instruments in Kinematically Aligned TKA

Precise bone resection is mandatory for kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA). This study is to investigate whether surgeon-dominated design can alter the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in KA-TKA compared with the engineer design. A total of 24 patients (24 knees) who underwent KA-TKA in our institution were assigned to an engineer design group (10 knees) and surgeon design group (14 knees) chronologically. A novel portable medical-engineer interactive application can greatly enhance the surgeon’s participation in PSI design. The bone resection discrepancies were used to evaluate the accuracy of PSI in bone resection. The overall discrepancy of bone resection was reduced by surgeon-designed PSI compared to engineer-designed PSI by 0.33 mm. Surgeon-designed PSI seems to reduce the outliers in terms of relative discrepancies in bone resection as well, but it does not reach statistical significance. Moreover, surgeon-designed PSI could significantly improve the accuracy of PSI in the restoration of the joint line in terms of medial proximal tibial angle and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle. This study indicates that the dominance of surgeons in both PSI design and subsequent surgical operation should be emphasized in efforts to improve the accuracy of PSI.

MRI-compatible electromagnetic servomotor for image-guided medical robotics

The soft-tissue imaging capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with high precision robotics has the potential to improve the precision and safety of a wide range of image-guided medical procedures. However, functional MRI-compatible robotics have not yet been realized in part because conventional electromagnetic servomotors can become dangerous projectiles near the strong magnetic field of an MRI scanner. Here we report an electromagnetic servomotor constructed from non-magnetic components, where high-torque and controlled rotary actuation is produced via interaction between electrical current in the servomotor armature and the magnetic field generated by the superconducting magnet of the MRI scanner itself. Using this servomotor design, we then build and test an MRI-compatible robot which can achieve the linear forces required to insert a large-diameter biopsy instrument in tissue during simultaneous MRI. Our electromagnetic servomotor can be safely operated (while imaging) in the patient area of a 3 Tesla clinical MRI scanner.

Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Implant Alignment Accuracy: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

Improving resection accuracy and eliminating outliers in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important to improving patient outcomes regardless of alignment philosophy. Robotic-assisted surgical systems improve resection accuracy and reproducibility compared to conventional instrumentation. Some systems require preoperative imaging while others rely on intraoperative anatomic landmarks. We hypothesized that the alignment accuracy of a novel image-free robotic-assisted surgical system would be equivalent or better than conventional instrumentation with fewer outliers.

METHODS

Forty cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Five orthopedic surgeons performed 8 bilateral TKAs each, using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted System (DePuy Synthes) and conventional instrumentation on contralateral knees. Pre-resection and postresection computed tomography scans, along with optical scans of the implant positions were performed to quantify resection accuracies relative to the alignment targets recorded intraoperatively.

RESULTS

The robotic-assisted cohort demonstrated smaller resection errors compared to conventional instrumentation in femoral coronal alignment (0.63° ± 0.50° vs 1.39° ± 0.95°, P < .001), femoral sagittal alignment (1.21° ± 0.90° vs 3.27° ± 2.51°, P < .001), and tibial coronal alignment (0.93° ± 0.72° vs 1.65° ± 1.29°, P = .001). All other resection angle accuracies were equivalent. Similar improvements were found in the femoral implant coronal alignment (0.89° ± 0.82° vs 1.42° ± 1.15°, P = .011), femoral implant sagittal alignment (1.51° ± 1.08° vs 2.49° ± 2.10°, P = .006), and tibial implant coronal alignment (1.31° ± 0.84° vs 2.03° ± 1.44°, P = .004). The robotic-assisted cohort had fewer outliers (errors >3°) for all angular resection alignments.

CONCLUSION

This in vitro study demonstrated that image-free robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy compared to conventional instrumentation and reduce the incidence of outliers.

Total elbow arthroplasty using an augmented reality-assisted surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Precision placement of implants in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using conventional surgical techniques can be difficult and riddled with errors. Modern technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and 3-dimensional (3D) printing have already found useful applications in many fields of medicine. We proposed a cutting-edge surgical technique, augmented reality total elbow arthroplasty (ARTEA), that uses AR and 3D printing to provide 3D information for intuitive preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of humeral and ulnar component placement using ARTEA.

METHODS

Twelve upper extremities from human frozen cadavers were used for experiments performed in this study. We scanned the extremities via computed tomography prior to performing TEA to plan placement sites using computer simulations. The ARTEA technique was used to perform TEA surgery on 6 of the extremities, whereas conventional (non-ARTEA) techniques were used on the other 6 extremities. Computed tomography scanning was repeated after TEA completion, and the error between the planned and actual placements of humeral and ulnar components was calculated and compared.

RESULTS

For humeral component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 1.4° ± 0.6° vs. 4.4° ± 0.9° in total rotation (P = .002) and 1.5 ± 0.6 mm vs. 8.6 ± 1.3 mm in total translation (P = .002). For ulnar component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 5.5° ± 3.1° vs. 19.5° ± 9.8° in total rotation (P = .004) and 1.5 ± 0.4 mm vs. 6.9 ± 1.6 mm in total translation (P = .002). Both rotational accuracy and translational accuracy were greater for joint components replaced using the ARTEA technique compared with the non-ARTEA technique (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional surgical techniques, ARTEA had greater accuracy in prosthetic implant placement when used to perform TEA.

A Randomized Trial Investigating the Cost-Utility of Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Obese Population

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the goal of increased accuracy of component positioning by custom fitting cutting guides to the patient's bony anatomy. A criticism of this technology is the associated cost. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the cost-utility of PSI compared with standard of care (SOC) instrumentation for TKA in an obese population.

METHODS

Patients with body mass index greater than 30 with osteoarthritis and undergoing primary TKA were randomized to SOC or PSI. Patients completed a health care resource use diary and the EuroQol-5D at three, six, nine, and 12 months and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at three and 12 months postsurgery. We performed cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses from public health care payer and societal perspectives.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the analysis with 86 patients randomized to PSI and 87 to SOC. PSI was dominated (more costly and less effective) by SOC from a health care payer perspective. From a societal perspective, an incremental cost-utility ratio was calculated at $11,230.00 per quality-adjusted life year gained, which is cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000. Net benefit analyses found PSI was not significantly cost-effective at any willingness to pay value from either perspective.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that widespread adoption of PSI may not be economically attractive or clinically indicated. Future considerations are to compare long-term clinical outcomes and radiographic alignment between the groups.

Mid-term functional outcomes of patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) utilizes three-dimensional imaging to produce total knee arthroplasty cutting jigs which matches patient's native anatomy. However, there are limited mid- to long-term studies examining its clinical efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes of PSI surgery versus conventional TKA surgery at 5-year follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively recruited into either the MRI-based PSI or conventional TKA group. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), while quality of life was evaluated with the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of Short-Form 36 and compared between the two groups at 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Although the PCS was 7 ± 3 points better in the PSI group preoperatively (p = 0.017), it became 5 ± 2 points worse than the conventional group at 5-year follow-up (p = 0.025). As compared to the PSI group, the conventional group showed a significantly greater improvement in PCS at 5 years as compared to before surgery (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in KSFS, KSKS, OKS or MCS between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PSI TKA did not result in improved functional outcomes or better quality of life when compared to conventional TKA. The additional costs and waiting time associated with PSI are not justifiable and therefore not recommended as an alternative to conventional TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Knee Prosthesis in the Computer Era

Over the past two decades, computer assistance has revolutionalized surgery and has enabled enormous advancements in knee prosthesis surgery. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a hot topic of orthopaedic research. Reflecting population dynamics, its use continues to increase, especially in high demand populations. Therefore, efforts to achieve the best fit and precise alignment in TKA continue. Computer assistance is valuable for knee prosthesis surgeons in this regard. This manuscript investigated the use of computer assistance in knee prosthesis surgery. The effects of computer use on important facets of knee prosthesis surgery, such as precision, clinical aspects, and costs, were examined. Moreover, an overall review of the recent literature on the navigation and personalized cutting guides was conducted.

[Clinical application of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities]

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the feasibility and accuracy of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities.

METHODS

Between July 2016 and February 2017, 20 patients with severe knee joint osteoarthritis planned to undergo primary TKA were selected as the research object. There were 9 males and 11 females; aged 53-84 years, with an average of 69.4 years. The body mass index was 22.1-31.0 kg/m 2, with an average of 24.8 kg/m 2. The preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint was (103.0±19.4)°, the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 5.4±1.3, and the American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score was 58.1±11.3. Before operation, a three-dimensional model of the knee joint was constructed based on the full-length X-ray film of lower extremities and CT of the knee joint. The distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide was designed and fabricated, and the thickness of the distal femoral osteotomy was determined by digital simulation. The thickness of the internal and external condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy were compared. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage loss, and hidden blood loss were recorded. The ROM of knee joint, VAS score, and HSS score at 3 months after operation were recorded to evaluate effectiveness. The position of the coronal and sagittal plane of the distal femoral prosthesis were assessed by comparing the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMAA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical femoral tibial angle (mFTA), distal femoral flexion angle (DFFA), femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), anatomical lateral femoral component angle (aLFC), and the angle of the femoral component and femoral shaft (α angle) between pre- and post-operation.

RESULTS

TKA was successfully completed with the aid of the distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide. There was no significant difference between the thickness of the internal and lateral condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complications such as periarticular infection and deep vein thrombosis. Except for 1 patient who was not treated with tranexamic acid, the intraoperative blood loss of the rest 19 patients ranged from 30 to 150 mL, with an average of 73.2 mL; the postoperative drainage loss ranged from 20 to 500 mL, with an average of 154.5 mL; and the hidden blood loss ranged from 169.2 to 1 400.0 mL, with an average of 643.8 mL. At 3 months after operation, the ROM of the knee was (111.5±11.5)°, and there was no significant difference when compared with the preoperative one ( t=-1.962, P=0.065). The VAS score was 2.4±0.9 and HSS score was 88.2±7.5, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative ones ( t=7.248, P=0.000; t=-11.442, P=0.000). Compared with the preoperative measurements, there was a significant difference in mFTA ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in aLDFA, FMAA, or DFFA; compared with the preoperative plan, there was no significant difference in FPFA, aLFC, or α angle ( P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremity can achieve precise osteotomy, improve coronal and sagittal limb alignment, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and obtain satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

The Bony Resection Accuracy with Patient-Specific Instruments during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series Study

Purpose

Bony resection is the primary step during total knee arthroplasty. The accuracy of bony resection was highly addressed because it was deemed to have a good relationship with mechanical line. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) were invented to copy the bony resection references from the preoperative surgical plan during a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, the accuracy still remains controversial. This study was aimed at finding out the accuracy of the bony resection during PSI-assisted TKA.

Methods

Forty-two PSI-assisted TKAs (based on full-length leg CT images) were analyzed retrospectively. Resected bones of every patient were given a CT scan, and three-dimensional radiographs were reconstructed. The thickness of each bony resection was measured with the three-dimensional radiographs and recorded. The saw blade thickness (1.27 mm) was added to the measurements, and the results represented intraoperative bone resection thickness. A comparison between intraoperative bone resection thickness and preoperatively planned thickness was conducted. The differences were calculated, and the outliers were defined as >3 mm.

Results

The distal femoral condyle had the most accurate bone cuts with the smallest difference (median, 1.0 mm at the distal medial femoral condyle and 0.8 mm at the distal lateral femoral condyle) and the least outliers (none at the distal medial femoral condyle and 1 (2.4%) at the distal lateral femoral condyle). The tibial plateau came in second (median difference, 0.8 mm at the medial tibial plateau and 1.4 mm at the lateral tibial plateau; outliers, none at the medial tibial plateau and 1 (2.6%) at the lateral tibial plateau). Regardless of whether the threshold was set to >2 mm (14 (17.9%) at the tibial plateau vs. 12 (14.6%) at the distal femoral condyle, p > 0.05) or >3 mm (1 (1.3%) at the tibial plateau vs. 1 (1.2%) at the distal femoral condyle, p > 0.05), the accuracy of tibial plateau osteotomy was similar to that of the distal femoral condyle. Osteotomy accuracy at the posterior femoral condyle and the anterior femoral condyle were the worst. Outliers were up to 6 (15.0%) at the posterior medial femoral condyle, 5 (12.2%) at the posterior lateral femoral condyle, and 6 (15.8%) at the anterior femoral condyle. The percentages of overcut and undercut tended to 50% in most parts except the lateral tibial plateau. At the lateral tibial plateau, the undercut percentage was twice that of the overcut.

Conclusion

The tibial plateau and the distal femoral condyle share a similar accuracy of osteotomy with PSI. PSI have a generally good accuracy during the femur and tibia bone resection in TKA. PSI could be a kind of user-friendly tool which can simplify TKA with good accuracy. Level of Evidence. This is a Level IV case series with no comparison group.

Geometric and volumetric relationship between human lumbar vertebrae and "Black-bone" MRI-based models

BACKGROUND

This study will examine the differences between human lumbar vertebrae, three-dimensional (3D) scans of these bones, 3D models based on 'Black-bone' magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and 3D-printed models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3D mesh models were created from the "Black-bone" MRI data from two cadaveric human spines, and then 3D printed. Four models were analysed and compared: anatomic bones, 3D-scanned models, MRI models and 3D-printed models.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between when comparing the average of all measurements between all model types (p = 0.81). The mean dice coefficient was 0.91 (SD 0.016) and the mean Hausdorff distance was 0.37 mm (SD 0.04 mm) when comparing the MRI model to the 3D-scanned model. The mean volumes for the MRI model and the 3D scanned model were 10.42 and 10.04 ml (p = 0.085), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'Black-bone' MRI could be a valid radiation-free alternative to computed tomography for the 3D printing of lumbar spinal biomodels.

High intra- and inter-observer reliability of planning implant size in MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) uses individually designed disposable guides to determine intraoperative bone cuts. The manufacturer provides the surgeon with proposed planning which can be modified and should be approved by the surgeon before the guides are produced. This study aims to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability among preoperative planning by orthopaedic surgeons using PSI. The authors hypothesize a high intra- and inter-observer reliability in planning TKA using PSI.

METHODS

Four orthopaedic surgeons modified and approved 40 preoperative MRI-based PSI plannings three times. The surgeons were blinded to their own and each other's results. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was obtained for planned implant size, resection, and position of the implant.

RESULTS

Intra-observer reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were excellent for femoral and tibial implant size with a range of 0.948-0.995 and 0.919-0.988, respectively. Inter-observer reliability for femoral and tibial implant size showed an ICC range of 0.953-0.982 and 0.839-0.951, respectively. Next to implant size, intra- and inter-observer reliability demonstrated good to an excellent agreement (ICC > 0.75) for 7 out of 12 remaining parameters and 6 out of 12 remaining parameters, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative planning of TKA implant size using MRI-based PSI showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. Further research on the comparison of predicted implant size preoperatively to intraoperative results is needed.

[Is the unlimited use of surgical instruments safe? : Discussion using the example of endoprosthetics]

As medical devices surgical instruments are important components when performing surgery. They can significantly influence the course and outcome of the surgery. Instruments are mechanically stressed in daily use and resterilized multiple times. The majority of manufacturer documentation for endoprostheses lacks specific information regarding tolerable instrument wear and the maximum number of applications for surgical instruments. So far, there are no mandatory algorithms for the necessity of checking and replacing surgical instruments. The risk of mechanical failure, surface damage and ultimately incidents is illustrated using endoprosthesis instruments as examples.

Computed tomography-based three-dimensional preoperative planning for total wrist arthroplasty

Total wrist arthroplasty is indicated for severely damaged joints; however, it is sometimes difficult to place the implant in the proper position. We report a case of total wrist arthroplasty using computed tomography (CT)-based 3D planning. After a 3D digital model of the wrist was reconstructed using preoperative planning software, the computer-aided design models of the implant were superimposed on the wrist and the appropriate size and position of the implant were determined. During surgery, the planned parameters were measured using a slide gauge to reproduce the planned position of the implant. The size of the implant used at surgery was the same as in 3D planning. Comparing the CT before and after surgery, the position of the implant was almost the same as in 3D planning on the radial side, but the carpal side was placed 7 mm proximal to the position in preoperative planning. Two years after surgery, the patient had no complications and radiography showed no obvious signs of aseptic loosening. Our method may contribute to a reduced incidence of complications, such as intraoperative fracture and postoperative dislocation, leading to improve long-term outcomes of total wrist arthroplasty.

Comparable clinical outcome and implant longevity after CT- or MRI-based patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of a RCT

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instruments (PSI) are already widespread used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Either computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used pre-operatively to create jigs to guide resection during surgery. This study is a sequel of previous work that showed significantly more radiological outliers for posterior slope when CT-based guides were used. The aim of this study was to assess differences in revision rate and clinical outcome between the two groups at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

At the 2-year follow-up, 124 patients were analysed in this prospective, randomised single-blind study. A survival analysis with revision of the TKA as endpoint was performed. Patients fulfilled four patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Scores on the questionnaires were compared between both groups at the different follow-up visits.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the survival rates of the CT- and MRI-based PSI surgery. Postoperatively, the PROMs significantly improved within each group compared with the pre-operative values. There were no significant differences for the PROMs between both groups at the 2-years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous results showed more outliers regarding posterior slope for CT-based PSIs, no difference in revision rate or the outcome of PROMs was found at 2-year follow-up. Further research to determine what the influence is of radiological outliers on implant survival and clinical outcomes is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with the conventional instrumentation (CI).

Methods

RCTs were selected in PubMed and Embase from 2012 to 2018. Key data extracted included malalignment of mechanical axis, blood loss, surgical time, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), length of stay, and complications. Subgroup analysis was also performed regarding different PSI systems and different image processing methods.

Results

29 RCTs with 2487 knees were eligible for the meta-analysis. Results showed that PSI did not improve the alignment of the mechanical axis compared with CI, but MRI-based PSI and Visionaire-specific PSI decrease the risk of malalignment significantly (P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and

Conclusion

PSI reduced the blood loss and improved KSS. MRI-based PSI reduced operative time and risk of malalignment of mechanical axis compared with CT-based PSI. Moreover, Visionaire-specific PSI achieves better alignment result of the mechanical axis than other systems.

Different targets of mechanical alignment do not improve knee outcomes after TKA

BACKGROUND

Accurate alignment is a basic principle of TKA surgery, but achieving alignment within this target may not translate into superior outcomes after surgery.

PURPOSE

To assess if neutral TKA mechanical alignment was associated with superior knee outcomes and to examine the effect of various aspects of pre-operative and post-operative alignment on knee function.

METHODS

Analysis of a database of 444 TKA patients between June 2009 and October 2016. Knee outcomes (WOMAC, AKSS and knee range of motion) were collected before surgery and during follow-up at a minimum of six months.

RESULTS

Analysis included 444 TKA patients (62% female, mean age 66 years, mean follow-up 23 months). Deformity varied from 21° varus (mean = 7.9, SD = 2.8) to 17° valgus deformity (mean = 7.7, SD = 2.8). Pre-operatively, 101 (23%) knees were in native neutral mechanical alignment, while 278 (63%) were in varus and 65 (15%) were in valgus. Post-operatively, a group of 365 (82%) TKA were found to be in neutral mechanical alignment and a group of 79 (18%) TKA were noted to be 'Outliers' (17 [4%] TKA > 3° varus and 62 [14%] TKA > 3° valgus alignment). Restoration of the target of alignment of 0 ± 3° or 0 ± 1°, did not have better functional outcomes scores, range of motion or prosthesis longevity than those in the outlier range.

CONCLUSION

Neutral TKA alignment did not appear to be a significant contributing factor to the improvement in knee function in short-medium term follow-up.

Postoperative mechanical alignment analysis of total knee replacement patients operated with 3D printed patient specific instruments: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a surgical treatment for final stage gonarthrosis. The lifespan of the prosthetic implants used in TKR surgery is a major interest for the orthopaedic research community.Previously, proper implant alignment of the implants has been advocated for longevity of the TKR surgery. Recently, patient-specific (PSI) instruments have been proposed to improve the mechanical alignment of the TKR by permitting better implant positioning over conventional TKR surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the mechanical alignment results of patients operated with PSIs and conventional instruments.

Methods

Two groups of 20 patients chosen in a quasi-random manner have been compared in this study. In the first group femoral distal and tibial osteotomies were made by a PSI which was produced by the patients' computed tomography scans. All osteotomies in the control group were made with the TKR set's routine instruments by conventional means. Patients' preoperative and postoperative mechanical femorotibal angles (mFTA), femoral coronal angles (FCA), tibial coronal angles (TCA) were measured and the number of outliers which showed more than 3° of malalignment were counted in both groups for comparison.

Results

The average postoperative mFTA was found to be 2.09° for the PSI group and in was found to be 2.84° for the control which was not statistically significant. The comparison of postoperative FCA and TCA also did not show significant difference between the groups. The number of outliers showing more than 3° of malalignment per group were found to be 1 out of 20 (5%) for the PSI group and 7 out of 20 (35%) for the control which was statistically significant.

Conclusion

In this study patient-specific instrumentation provided significantly better mechanical alignment compared to conventional TKR for the frequency of outlier cases with malalignment beyond 3°. PSI proved no significant difference when the groups were compared for mFTA, FCA and TCA. Our findings support that PSI may improve TKR alignment by improving the ratio of the outlier patients with marked malalignment.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. During the past decade, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been commercially introduced in order to simplify and make TKA surgery more effective, precise and efficient than conventional mechanical instrumentation (CI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against PSI for routine use. The aim of the current manuscript is to describe advantages and limitations of PSI for primary TKA.

AREAS COVERED

By means of a description of the available literature different aspects are discussed (accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, blood loss, efficiency and costs).

EXPERT OPINION

Most publications do not claim a significant increase in PSI accuracy over CI, but they also do not postulate PSIs accuracy is worse either. Regarding clinical aspects, PSI did not appear to give any advantage over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. PSI seems to reduce operative time, could reduce perioperative blood loss and provides logistical benefits in the operation room. Further studies will be required to more thoroughly assess all the advantages and disadvantages of this promising technology as an alternative to CI and CAS.

A randomized controlled trial investigating the value of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in the Canadian healthcare system

Aims

The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional surgical instrumentation (CSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of early implant migration, alignment, surgical resources, patient outcomes, and costs.

Patients and Methods

The study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 50 patients undergoing TKA. There were 25 patients in each of the PSI and CSI groups. There were 12 male patients in the PSI group and seven male patients in the CSI group. The patients had a mean age of 69.0 years (sd 8.4) in the PSI group and 69.4 years (sd 8.4) in the CSI group. All patients received the same TKA implant. Intraoperative surgical resources and any surgical waste generated were recorded. Patients underwent radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies to measure femoral and tibial component migration over two years. Outcome measures were recorded pre- and postoperatively. Overall costs were calculated for each group.

Results

There were no differences (p > 0.05) in any measurement of migration at two years for either the tibial or femoral components. Movement between one and two years was < 0.2 mm, indicating stable fixation. There were no differences in coronal or sagittal alignment between the two groups. The PSI group took a mean 6.1 minutes longer (p = 0.04) and used a mean 3.4 less trays (p < 0.0001). Total waste generated was similar (10 kg) between the two groups. The PSI group cost a mean CAD$1787 more per case (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

RSA criteria suggest that both groups will have revision rates of approximately 3% at five years. The advantages of PSI were minimal or absent for surgical resources used and waste eliminated, and for meeting target alignment, yet had significantly greater costs. Therefore, we conclude that PSI may not offer any advantage over CSI for routine primary TKA cases. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:565–572.

Statistical shape model-based prediction of tibiofemoral cartilage

Computed tomography is used more routinely to design patient-specific instrumentation for knee replacement surgery. Its moderate imaging cost and simplified segmentation reduce design costs compared with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, but it cannot provide the necessary cartilage information. Our method based on statistical shape modelling proved to be successful in predicting tibiofemoral cartilage in leave-one-out experiments. The obtained accuracy of 0.54 mm for femur and 0.49 mm for tibia outperforms the average cartilage thickness distribution and reported inter-observer MR segmentation variability. These results suggest that shape modelling is able to predict tibiofemoral cartilage with sufficient accuracy to design patient-specific instrumentation.

Computed tomography-based 3-dimensional preoperative planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS

Three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) would be helpful for estimation of the implant size and accurate placement of implants.

METHODS

We included 28 patients who underwent TEA with an unlinked total elbow implant in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography scans of the elbow before surgery, and a 3D digital model of the elbow was reconstructed. After the appropriate size and position of the prosthesis were determined, 10 points around the bone tunnel (4 on the humerus and 6 on the ulna) were measured to plan the insertion of the humeral and ulnar stems. Two-dimensional planning was also performed using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Intraoperatively, the surgeon measured the planned parameters using a slide gauge to reproduce the 3D planned position of the stem insertion.

RESULTS

The stem sizes were accurately estimated in 57% of patients for the humerus and 68% for the ulna with 2-dimensional planning and in 86% for the humerus and 96% for the ulna with 3D planning. The mean differences between the positions of the prostheses after surgery with reference to the planned positions were 0.8° of varus and 1.5° of flexion for the humeral component and 0.7° of varus and 2.9° of flexion for the ulnar component. We did not evaluate rotational positioning in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D surgical planning allowed accurate estimation of the implant size and appropriate placement of implants. This method may contribute to a reduced incidence of complications and improved long-term outcomes from TEA.

Patient-Specific Instruments Based on Knee Joint Computed Tomography and Full-Length Lower Extremity Radiography in Total Knee Replacement

Background:

Restoring good alignment after total knee replacement (TKR) is still a challenge globally, and the clinical efficiency of patient-specific instruments (PSIs) remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to explore the value and significance of three-dimensional printing PSIs based on knee joint computed tomography (CT) and full-length lower extremity radiography in TKR.

Methods:

Between June 2013 and October 2014, 31 TKRs were performed using PSIs based on knee joint CT and full-length lower extremity radiography in 31 patients (5 males and 26 females; mean age: 67.6 ± 7.9 years; body mass index [BMI]: 27.4 ± 3.5 kg/m²). Thirty-one matched patients (4 males and 27 females; mean age: 67.4 ± 7.2 years; mean BMI: 28.1 ± 4.6 kg/m²) who underwent TKR using conventional instruments in the same period served as the control group. The mean follow-up period was 38 months (31–47 months). Knee Society Score (KSS), surgical time, and postoperative drainage volume were recorded. Coronal alignment was measured on full-length radiography.

Results:

Twenty-three (74.2%) and 20 (64.5%) patients showed good postoperative alignment in the PSI and control groups, respectively, without significant difference between the two groups (χ²= 0.68, P = 0.409). The mean surgical time was 81.48 ± 16.40 min and 72.90 ± 18.10 min for the PSI and control groups, respectively, without significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.41, P = 0.055). The postoperative drainage volume was 250.9 ± 148.8 ml in the PSI group, which was significantly less than that in the control group (602.1 ± 230.6 ml, t = 6.83, P < 0.001). No significant difference in the KSS at the final follow-up was found between the PSI and control groups (91.06 ± 3.26 vs. 90.19 ± 3.84, t = 0.95, P = 0.870).

Conclusions:

The use of PSIs based on knee joint CT and standing full-length lower extremity radiography in TKR resulted in acceptable alignment compared with the use of conventional instruments, although the marginal advantage was not statistically different. Surgical time and clinical results were also similar between the two groups. However, the PSI group had less postoperative drainage.

Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are already in relatively common use, and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation. PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan, CT scan, or a combination of MRI and a long-leg standing radiograph. However, there is no consensus as to which of these modalities, MRI or CT, is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs.

METHODS

This systematic literature review and meta-analysis studied the differences in alignment outliers between CT- and MRI-based PSI for TKA. A search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase was conducted, without restriction on date of publication. Only level I evidence studies written in English that included TKA with the use of MRI- and CT-based PSI were selected. A meta-analysis was then performed of the rate of outliers in the biomechanical axis and individual femoral and tibial component alignment. Where considerable heterogeneity among studies was present or the data did not provide sufficient information for performing the meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials, studying 841 knees, were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. MRI-based PSI resulted in a significantly lower proportion of coronal plane outliers with regard to the lateral femoral component (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.89, P = 0.02), without significant heterogeneity (n.s.). There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as, if not better than, that with CT-based PSI. To prevent for malalignment, MRI should be the imaging modality of choice when performing TKA surgery with PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

A 2-year RSA study of the Vanguard CR total knee system: A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-specific positioning guides with conventional technique

Background and purpose - There is some concern regarding the revision rate of the Vanguard CR TKA in 1 registry, and the literature is ambiguous about the efficacy of patient-specific positioning guides (PSPGs). The objective of this study was to investigate the stability of the cemented Vanguard CR Total Knee using 2 different surgical techniques. Our hypothesis was that there is no difference in migration when implanting the Vanguard CR with either PSPGs or conventional technique. We hereby present a randomized controlled trial of 2-year follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients and methods - 40 TKAs were performed between 2011 and 2013 with either PSPGs or the conventional technique and 22 of these were investigated with RSA. Results - The PSPG (8 knees) and the conventional (14 knees) groups had a mean maximum total point motion (MTPM) (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.48-1.18) vs. 0.70 (0.43-0.97) mm, 1.03 (0.60-1.43) vs. 0.86 (0.53-1.19), and 1.46 (1.07-1.85) vs. 0.80 (0.52-1.43) at 3, 12, and 24 months respectively (p = 0.1). 5 implants had either an MTPM >1.6 mm at 12 months and/or a migration of more than 0.2 mm between 1- and 2-year follow-ups. 2 of these also had a peripheral subsidence of more than 0.6 mm at 2 years. Interpretation - 5 implants (3 in the PSPG group) were found to be at risk of later aseptic loosening. The PSPG group continuously migrated between 12 and 24 months. The conventional group had an initial high migration between postoperative and 3 months, but seemed more stable after 1 year. Although the difference was not statistically significant, we think the migration in the PSPG group is of some concern.

Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The primary aim of the study was to examine stability and alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI). The hypothesis was that stability and alignment would be better using PSI than CI, 12 months postoperatively. The secondary aim included the evaluation of clinical outcomes after TKA.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 42 patients with knee osteoarthritis received a Genesis II PS prosthesis with either PSI or CI. Patients visited the hospital preoperatively and postoperatively after 6 weeks and 3 and 12 months. To evaluate stability, varus-valgus laxity was determined in extension and flexion using stress radiographs 12 months postoperatively. Three months postoperatively, a long-leg radiograph and CT scan were obtained to measure hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment and component rotation. Furthermore, frontal and sagittal alignment of the components, the Knee Society Score, VAS Pain, VAS Satisfaction, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Patella score (Kujala), University of California Los Angeles activity score, anterior-posterior laxity, (serious) adverse device-related events, and intraoperative complications were reported. The clinical outcomes were compared using independent t tests or non-parametric alternatives, and repeated measurements ANOVA with a significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding stability, HKA angle, and rotational alignment. In four patients, the PSI did not fit correctly on the tibia and/or femur requiring intraoperative modifications. Both groups improved significantly over time on all clinical outcomes, with no significant differences between the groups 12 months postoperatively. The PSI group showed less tibial slope than the patients in the CI group [PSI 2.6° versus CI 4.8° (p = 0.02)]. Finally, the PSI group more frequently received a thinner insert size than the CI group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients operated with PSI did not differ from CI in terms of stability and alignment. However, in the PSI group ligament releases were more often required intraoperatively. Furthermore, the two methods did not show different clinical results. It seems that the preoperative planning for the PSI facilitates more conservative bone cuts than CI, but whether this is clinically relevant should be investigated. Since PSI is more expensive and time consuming than CI, and does not outperform CI with regard to clinical results, we recommend to use CI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Advances in Computer-Aided Technology for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Technology such as computer-assisted navigation systems, robotic-assisted systems, and patient-specific instrumentation has been increasingly explored during the past decade in an effort to optimize component alignment and improve clinical outcomes. Computer-assisted navigation accurately restores mechanical-axis alignment, but clinical outcome data are inconsistent. Computer-assisted navigation gap balancing has shown early promise in establishing mechanical-axis alignment with improved functional outcomes. Robotic-assisted systems more accurately restore component alignment when compared with computer-assisted navigation, but clinical outcomes have yet to be determined. Patient-specific instrumentation does not consistently improve alignment, accuracy, or patient outcomes. Studies demonstrating implant survivorship, cost-efficiency, and improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are needed. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):338-352.].