Reasons for Underreporting of Uremic Pruritus in People With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study

Pathways for Diagnosing and Treating CKD-Associated Pruritus: A Narrative Review

Purpose of Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a common, persistent, and distressing itch experienced by patients across the CKD spectrum. Although the disorder is associated with adverse outcomes and poor health-related quality of life, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this narrative review is to offer health care providers guidance on how to effectively identify, assess, and treat patients with CKD-associated pruritus, with the goal of reducing symptom burden and improving patient-important outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL).

Sources of Information

A panel of nephrologists and researchers from across Canada and the United States was assembled to develop this narrative review based on the best available data, current treatment guidelines, and their clinical experiences.

Methods

A panel of nephrologists who actively care for patients with pruritus receiving dialysis from across Canada was assembled. Two researchers from the United States were also included based on their expertise in the diagnosis and management of CKD-associated pruritus. Throughout Spring 2023, the panel met to discuss key topics in the identification, assessment, and management of CKD-associated pruritus. Panel members subsequently developed summaries of the pertinent information based on the best available data, current treatment guidelines, and added information on their own clinical experiences. In all cases, approval of the article was sought and achieved through discussion.

Key Findings

This narrative review provides pragmatic guidance addressing: (1) methods for screening CKD-associated pruritus, (2) assessing severity, (3) management of CKD-associated pruritus, and (4) suggested areas for future research. The panel developed a 3-pillar framework for proactive assessment and severity scoring in CKD-aP: systematic screening for CKD-associated pruritus (pillar 1), assessment of pruritus intensity (pillar 2), and understanding the impact of CKD-associated pruritus on the patient's QoL (pillar 3). Management of CKD-associated pruritus can include ensuring optimization of dialysis adequacy, achieving mineral metabolism targets (ie, calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone). However, treatment of CKD-associated pruritus usually requires additional interventions. Patients, regardless of CKD-associated pruritus severity, should be counseled on adequate skin hydration and other non-pharmacological strategies to reduce pruritus. Antihistamines should be avoided in favor of evidence-based treatments, such as difelikefalin and gabapentin.

Limitations

A formal systematic review (SR) of the literature was not undertaken, although published SRs were reviewed. The possibility for bias based on the experts' own clinical experiences may have occurred. Key takeaways are based on the current available evidence, of which head-to-head clinical trials are lacking.

Funding

This work was funded by an arm's length grant from Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. (the importer and distributer of difelikefalin in Canada). LiV Medical Education Agency Inc. provided logistical and editorial support.

Italian healthcare resource consumption for patients on hemodialysis treated for chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP)

Background

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) affects patients on hemodialysis. This study identified hemodialysis patients presumably affected or not affected by CKD-aP and integrated healthcare costs, from the perspective of the Italian administrative healthcare data.

Methods

Through cross-linkage of Italian administrative healthcare data collected between 2015 and 2017 (accrual period) in the database of Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute), patients undergoing in-hospital/outpatient hemodialysis were selected. Cohorts with and without CKD-aP were created based on the presence/absence of CKD-aP-related treatment (according to common clinical practice and guidelines) supplies and assessed in terms of CKD-aP-related treatments and mean healthcare costs per capita paid by the Italian National Health Service (INHS).

Results

Of 1,239 people on hemodialysis for ≥2 years, CKD-aP affected 218 patients. Patients with CKD-aP were older and with more comorbidities. During the follow-up year, on average, the INHS spent €37,065 per case, €31,286 per control and € 35,988 per non-CKD-aP subject. High-efficiency dialytic therapies performed to people on hemodialysis with CKD-aP largely weighed on the overall mean annual cost.

Conclusions

This real-world study identified patients on chronic hemodialysis potentially treated for CKD-aP. Interestingly, high-efficiency dialysis seems the most frequent and expensive choice for the treatment of CKD-aP. The discovery of appropriate and effective treatments for this condition might offer cost offsets.

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is associated with worse quality of life and increased healthcare utilization among dialysis patients

PURPOSE

Chronic pruritus significantly impairs hemodialysis patients' health status and quality of life (QOL) and it is associated with higher mortality rate, more frequent hospitalizations, poorer dialysis and medication adherence, and deteriorated mental status. However, pruritus is still underestimated, underdiagnosed, and undertreated in the real-life clinical scenario. We investigated prevalence, clinical characteristics, clinical correlates, severity as well as physical and psychological burden of chronic pruritus among adult hemodialysis patients in a large international real-world cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients registered in 152 Fresenius Medical Care (FMC) NephroCare clinics located in Italy, France, Ireland, United Kingdom, and Spain. Demographic and medical data were retrieved from the EuCliD® (European Clinical) database, while information on pruritus and QoL were abstracted from KDQOL™-36 and 5-D Itch questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

A total of 6221 patients were included, of which 1238 were from France, 163 Ireland, 1469 Italy, 2633 Spain, and 718 UK. The prevalence of mild-to-severe pruritus was 47.9% (n = 2977 patients). Increased pruritus severity was associated with increased use of antidepressants, antihistamines, and gabapentin. Patients with severe pruritus more likely suffered from diabetes, more frequently missed dialysis sessions, and underwent more hospitalizations due to infections. Both mental and physical QOL scores were progressively lower as the severity of pruritus increased; this association was robust to adjustment for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

This international real-world analysis confirms that chronic pruritus is a highly prevalent condition among dialysis patients and highlights its considerable burden on several dimensions of patients' life.

The Burden of Pruritus Associated With CKD: A Mixed Methods Analysis Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis

Rationale & Objective

Despite its prevalence and distress to patients, chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is poorly characterized, which may contribute to the condition's underdiagnosis and inadequate management. This study aimed to understand the symptom experience of patients with CKD-aP and the extent to which pruritus impacts their lives.

Study Design

Mixed methods study including one-on-one qualitative interviews and completion of the Skindex-10 Questionnaire (measuring itch-related quality of life).

Setting & Participants

A total of 23 patients undergoing hemodialysis and reporting pruritus at 4 dialysis centers in the United States.

Analytical Approach

Interviews followed a semistructured guide that included targeted and follow-up questions to elicit discussion of patients' symptoms of pruritus, including frequency and variability, impact on activities of daily living, and emotional and social functioning. Interviews were digitally audio-recorded. A coding dictionary was developed from transcripts to analyze themes and concepts.

Results

Participants described their itch with various terms, including "numbness," "pain," and "tingling" on their skin. Itch affected multiple areas but especially the back, usually occurred daily, and was often worse at night. For some, itching was a constant experience. Patients relieved their itch through scratching and various off-label treatments; some reported skin damage from excessive scratching and most indicated treatments provided limited relief. Pruritus considerably disrupted physical function, including sleep, daily activities, social functioning and relationships, and emotional and psychological wellbeing. All participants reported being bothered by their itching during the past week on the Skindex-10 Questionnaire.

Limitations

All participants were from the United States, so the findings may not be generalizable to other countries.

Conclusions

Although symptom experience varies considerably, CKD-aP causes severe distress for many patients undergoing hemodialysis and can profoundly impair their quality of life. The results of this study show the impact of itch from patients' perspectives and highlight the need for greater awareness and better management of this condition.

Plain-Language Summary

Patients with chronic kidney disease often experience itching, or pruritus, but its importance to patients is regularly overlooked. This study used one-on-one interviews to investigate patients' experiences of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus and how it impacts their lives. We found that participants experienced itch on various body areas and used different words to describe their itch (eg, "numbness" and "pain"). Some reported skin damage from excessive scratching, and many used off-label treatments and other interventions (eg, rubbing alcohol and multiple showers daily), which provided limited relief. For many, itching was experienced daily and severely disrupted sleep, daily activities, interactions with others, and mental wellbeing. These findings reveal chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus severely impacts patients and highlights the need for improved management of this condition.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus and Quality of Life: Learning from Our Patients

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus is itching directly related to kidney disease that cannot be explained by any other condition. Despite technological advances in the different aspects of dialysis sessions and the best treatment for chronic kidney disease patients, it is still a common problem in our patients. The many complex physiological mechanisms involved, the different hypotheses made over the years on the aetiology of the condition, and the great clinical variability may partially explain the limited knowledge about this problem and the difficulties in treating it. The presence of all these factors leads to the persistence of unpleasant symptoms, which must affect the disease burden and quality of life of kidney patients. Through the presentation of an illustrative clinical case, the aim of this review article is to highlight the need for adequate diagnosis and an improved approach to all aspects of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus, in view of the heavy burden of the disease and the huge impact on the patient's quality of life.

Moderate-to-severe pruritus in untreated or non-responsive hemodialysis patients: results of the French prospective multicenter observational study Pruripreva

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common condition in patients treated with hemodialysis, and has a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Due to the lack of standardized diagnostic tools and frequent underreporting, pruritus prevalence remains poorly documented.

METHODS

Pruripreva was a prospective multicenter observational study that aimed to evaluate the prevalence of moderate to severe pruritus in a cohort of French hemodialysis patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients with mean Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score ≥4 calculated over 7 days (moderate pruritus, 4-6; severe, 7-8; very severe, 9-10). Impact of CKD-aP on QoL was analyzed according to its severity (WI-NRS), using 5-D Itch scale, EQ-5D and Short Form (SF)-12.

RESULTS

Mean WI-NRS was ≥4 in 306 patients (mean age, 66.6 years; male, 57.6%) out of 1304 and prevalence of moderate to very severe pruritus was 23.5% (95% confidence interval 21.2-25.9). Pruritus was unknown prior to the systematic screening in 37.6% of patients, and 56.4% of those affected were treated for this condition. The more severe the pruritus, the poorer the QoL according to the 5-D Itch scale, EQ-5D and SF-12.

CONCLUSION

Moderate to very severe pruritus was reported in 23.5% of hemodialysis patients. CKD-aP was underrated although it is associated with a negative impact on QoL. These data confirm that pruritus in this setting is an underdiagnosed and underreported condition. There is an urgent demand for new therapies to treat chronic pruritus associated with CKD in hemodialysis patients.

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: Xerosis and topical therapy

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common and distressing symptom for patients with CKD and a difficult challenge for nephrologists and dermatologists. Recent results showed the multifactorial nature of the pathophysiology, and therapeutic trials were only successful in certain subsets of patients. The clinical manifestations are varied, with xerosis being the most common dermatological manifestation and correlated with the intensity of CKD-aP. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of xerosis in CKD-aP and appropriate topical treatment could correct xerosis to reduce the intensity of CKD-aP and improve the patient's quality of life.

Obstacles to Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Pruritus in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Perspectives

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common condition amongst patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several studies have confirmed that more than four out of ten early-stage CKD patients suffer from this condition, while its prevalence among CKD patients on dialysis reaches up to seven out of ten. It is noted to be associated with other disabling symptoms and serious outcomes. It has significant impact on sleep, mood, daily activities, and quality of life of CKD patients, and increased mortality risk of patients on hemodialysis. The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study found 17% higher mortality among patients with moderate to extreme pruritus compared with patients with no or mild pruritus. Despite its high prevalence, ill-effect, and suffering associated with it, CKD-aP remains surprisingly under-reported on the patient's part and under-recognized by the healthcare team. Even upon being noticed, it remains unattended and poorly treated. Its etiopathogenesis is complex and not fully understood. Many treatment options are available but good quality evidence about most of those is absent, and to date, only two medications are approved for use in this condition. While a validated guideline is very much required for the benefit of the patients and caretakers, further research on several aspects of this issue is required.

Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide insight into patients' experienced health and needs, and can improve patient-professional communication. However, little is known about how to discuss PROM results. This study aimed to provide in-depth knowledge of patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences with and perspectives on discussing PROM results as part of routine dialysis care.

DESIGN

A qualitative study was performed using an interpretive description approach. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 patients and healthcare professionals. Interviews focused on general and specific situations (eg, addressing sensitive topics or when no medical treatment is available). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed inductively using thematic analysis.

SETTING

Participants were purposively sampled from eight dialysis centres across the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Interviews were conducted with 10 patients receiving dialysis treatment and 12 healthcare professionals (nephrologists and nurses).

RESULTS

Patients and healthcare professionals provided practical guidance for optimal discussion about PROM results. First, patients and healthcare professionals emphasised that PROM results should always be discussed and indicated how to create a suitable setting, adequately prepare, deal with time constraints and use PROMs as a tool for personalised holistic consultations. Second, patients should actively participate and healthcare professionals should take a guiding role. A trusting patient-professional relationship was considered a prerequisite and patient-professional interaction was described as a collaboration in which both contribute their knowledge, experiences and ideas. Third, follow-up after discussing PROM results was considered important, including evaluations and actions (eg, symptom management) structurally embedded into the multidisciplinary treatment process. These general themes also applied to the specific situations, for example: results should also be discussed when no medical treatment is available. Though, healthcare professionals were expected to take more initiative and a leading role when discussing sensitive topics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into how to organise and conduct conversations about PROM results and lays the foundation for training healthcare professionals to optimally discuss PROM results in routine nephrology care. Further research is needed to provide guidance on follow-up actions in response to specific PROM results.

Pruritus in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Update

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKDaP) is an often under-diagnosed and under-recognized condition, despite its considerable prevalence within the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. Universally accepted guidelines are also lacking. The true prevalence of CKDaP worldwide therefore remains unknown, although its negative impact on mortality and health-related quality of life outcomes is very clear. The pathophysiological mechanisms leading to the onset of CKDaP are only partly understood. CKDaP is currently believed to be caused by a multifactorial process, from local skin changes, metabolic alterations, the development of neuropathy and dysregulation of opioid pathways, and psychological factors. Much work has been carried out towards a more systematic and structured approach to clinical diagnosis. Various tools are now available to assess the severity of CKDaP. Many of these tools require greater validation before they can be incorporated into the guidelines and into routine clinical practice. Further efforts are also needed in order to increase the awareness of clinicians and patients so that they can identify the CKDaP signs and symptoms in a timely manner. Currently established treatment options for CKDaP focus on the prevention of xerosis via topical emollients, the optimization of dialysis management, early referral to kidney transplantation if appropriate, oral antihistamine, and a variety of neuropathic agents. Other novel treatment options include the following: topical analgesics, topical tacrolimus, cannabinoid-containing compounds, antidepressants, oral leukotrienes, opioids, and non-pharmacological alternative therapies (i.e., phototherapy, dietary supplements, acupuncture/acupressure). We provide an updated review on the evidence relating to the epidemiology, the pathophysiology, the clinical assessment and diagnosis, and the management of CKDaP.

Symptom clusters in chronic kidney disease and their association with people's ability to perform usual activities

Background

People living with a long-term condition, such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), often suffer from multiple symptoms simultaneously, making symptom management challenging. This study aimed to identify symptom clusters in adults with CKD across treatment groups and investigate their association with people’s ability to perform their usual activities.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of both cross-sectional and longitudinal data collected as part of a national service improvement programme in 14 kidney centres in England, UK. This data included symptom severity (17 items, POS-S Renal) and the extent to which people had problems performing their usual activities (single item, EQ-5D-5L). We categorised data by treatment group: haemodialysis (n = 1,462), transplantation (n = 866), peritoneal dialysis (n = 127), or CKD without kidney replacement therapy (CKD non-KRT; n = 684). We used principal component analysis to identify symptom clusters per treatment group, and proportional odds models to assess the association between clusters and usual activities.

Results

Overall, clusters related to: lack of energy and mobility; gastrointestinal; skin; and mental health. Across groups, the ‘lack of energy and mobility’ clusters were associated with having problems with usual activities, with odds ratios (OR) ranging between 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.57) for haemodialysis and 1.56 for peritoneal dialysis (95% CI, 1.28–1.90). This association was confirmed longitudinally in haemodialysis (n = 399) and transplant (n = 249) subgroups.

Implications

Our findings suggest that healthcare professionals should consider routinely assessing symptoms in the ‘lack of energy & mobility’ cluster in all people with CKD, regardless of whether they volunteer this information; not addressing these symptoms is likely to be related to them having problems with performing usual activities. Future studies should explore why symptoms within clusters commonly co-occur and how they interrelate. This will inform the development of cluster-level symptom management interventions with enhanced potential to improve outcomes for people with CKD.

Itching in dialysis patients: impact on health-related quality of life and interactions with sleep problems and psychological symptoms – results from the RENINE/PROMs registry

Background

Itching (pruritus) is common in dialysis patients, but little is known about its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), sleep problems and psychological symptoms. This study investigates the impact of itching in dialysis patients by looking into the persistence of itching, the effect of itching on the course of HRQOL and the combined effect of itching with sleep problems and with psychological symptoms on HRQOL.

Methods

Data were obtained from the RENINE/PROMs registry and included 2978 dialysis patients who completed patient-reported outcome measures between 2018 and 2020. Itching, sleep problems and psychological symptoms were assessed with the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) and HRQOL with the 12-item Short Form Health Survey. Effects of itching on HRQOL and interactions with sleep problems and psychological symptoms were investigated cross-sectionally and longitudinally using linear regression and linear mixed models.

Results

Half of the patients experienced itching and in 70% of them, itching was persistent. Itching was associated with a lower physical and mental HRQOL {−3.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) −4.12 to −2.59) and −3.79 [95% CI −4.56 to −3.03]}. HRQOL remained stable during 2 years and trajectories did not differ between patients with or without itching. Sleep problems (70% versus 52%) and psychological symptoms (36% versus 19%) were more common in patients with itching. These symptoms had an additional negative effect on HRQOL but did not interact with itching.

Conclusions

The persistence of itching, its impact on HRQOL over time and the additional effect on HRQOL of sleep problems and psychological symptoms emphasize the need for recognition and effective treatment of itching to reduce symptom burden and improve HRQOL.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice for Pruritus Management in Physicians and Patients with Diabetes

Pruritus is a common dermatological condition observed in patients with diabetes, making it a dermatometabolic condition. Being multiaethiological, pruritis is caused by autoimmune, genetic, infectious and various systemic diseases. The present survey aimed to understand the knowledge, attitude and practice toward pruritus among Indian physicians and patients with diabetes presenting with pruritus. A telephonic, cross-sectional, qualitative survey was conducted among physicians and patients across five cities in India from July-August 2020. An open-ended discussion guide was used for the interview; the data were analyzed to check for common themes and trends. A majority of the consulting physicians (CPs) believed that uncontrolled diabetes is the main causal factor for pruritus in patients with diabetes and reported that currently there are no standard tests or treatment guidelines for its management. CPs emphasized proper monitoring and counseling to overcome current challenges. Patients reported a negative impact of pruritus on their daily activities and quality of life. The survey concluded that poor management of diabetes is one of the main causal factors for patients with diabetes presenting with pruritus in India. CPs emphasized controlling diabetes along with symptomatic treatment. For patients, pruritus has multifaceted effects on their health, overall well-being, and quality of life.

Novel approach to unpleasant symptom clusters surrounding pruritus in patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic kidney disease-associated-pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common symptom in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis. CKD-aP typically occurs alongside other debilitating symptoms and may comprise so-called 'symptom clusters' which have synergistic effects that adversely impact patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Importantly, symptoms in a cluster may share a common biological mechanism. Here we review the clinical impact of CKD-aP and its association with other symptoms reported by dialysis patients. The clinical benefits of treating pruritus and its potential impact on other symptoms are also addressed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have shown CKD-aP significantly impairs HRQoL in patients with ESKD undergoing dialysis and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased risk of infections, hospitalizations, and mortality. Despite these negative effects, CKD-aP remains underrecognized and undertreated in clinical practice. CKD-aP is frequently associated with other symptoms, including disturbed sleep/poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and pain. Clinical studies of antipruritic therapies show that reduction of itch intensity may also alleviate other associated symptoms, such as poor sleep quality.

SUMMARY

CKD-aP and its associated symptoms are inadequately managed in clinical practice. Greater understanding and awareness of CKD-aP and its surrounding symptom clusters in dialysis patients may improve their overall symptom management and HRQoL.

Epidemiology and burden of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus

Chronic kidney disease–associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common, yet underrecognized condition in patients with CKD and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Real-world observational studies indicate that CKD-aP affects up to 80% of ESKD patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD), with ∼40% experiencing moderate to severe itch. CKD-aP can negatively impact patients’ mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and is also associated with sleep disturbance and depression. Several studies have found that CKD-aP is a predictor of adverse medical outcomes, including an increased risk of hospitalizations and mortality. In this article we review the literature relating to the epidemiology of CKD-aP to describe its prevalence across the treatment spectrum of CKD (non-dialysis, HD, peritoneal dialysis and transplant recipients) and to summarize potential risk factors associated with its development. We also review key data from studies that have evaluated the impact of CKD-aP on HRQoL and medical outcomes.

[Pruritus associated chronic kidney disease]

Pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is a frequent and disabling symptom in patients with severe chronic kidney disease treated by dialysis. It is associated with a poor quality of life, an increased risk of comorbidities and even mortality. Nevertheless, its prevalence is underestimated by nephrologists. The pathophysiology of pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is not well understood, but several mechanisms seem to contribute to its occurrence: accumulation and skin deposition of uremic toxins, peripheral neuropathy causing an activation of the pruritogenic cowhage pathway, chronic microinflammation, opioid imbalance, and kidney disease-related skin xerosis. Optimization of the treatment of chronic kidney disease treatment, of dialysis parameters, and general skin care measures should always be performed prior to the introduction of systemic therapy targeting one or more of these mechanisms. The available therapeutic trials remain mostly at high risk of bias, with small patient numbers. Gabapentinoids are the molecules recommended as first-line therapy. Peripheral opioid agonists could find a place of choice in the treatment of pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease and will soon be available in France. The low level of evidence for the other molecules does not currently allow us to specify a second-line treatment for this condition.

A Narrative Review of Management Strategies for Common Symptoms in Advanced CKD

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience multiple bothersome symptoms, undermining their quality of life (QOL). With growing attention to the importance of symptom management in advanced CKD, the evidence regarding symptoms is increasing. In this review, we briefly summarize the current evidence of effective pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions to improve symptoms and QOL in patients with advanced CKD, including those on dialysis. We focused on symptoms that are commonly experienced by patients, such as pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, itching, nausea and vomiting, cognitive impairment, and anxiety and depression. We noted that research in symptom science focused on improving symptom management in CKD is still very limited. In addition to the lack of clinical practice guidelines to address those common symptoms, the major gaps in the current literature include the evidence regarding mechanistic pathways to inform the development of effective symptom management for CKD populations, the evidence to confirm effective pharmacologic interventions in other populations for CKD populations, and research on how to incorporate effective symptom management approaches into clinical care. Although improving mortality remains as an important area in the kidney community, there is an urgent need to focus on improving symptom management to improve QOL in advanced CKD.

Self-reported Pruritus and Clinical, Dialysis-Related, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus, generalized itching related to CKD, affects many aspects of hemodialysis patients' lives. However, information regarding the relationship between pruritus and several key outcomes in hemodialysis patients remains limited.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

23,264 hemodialysis patients from 21 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phases 4 to 6 (2009-2018).

EXPOSURE

Pruritus severity, based on self-reported degree to which patients were bothered by itchy skin (5-category ordinal scale from "not at all" to "extremely").

OUTCOMES

Clinical, dialysis-related, and patient-reported outcomes.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cox regression for time-to-event outcomes and modified Poisson regression for binary outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients at least moderately bothered by pruritus was 37%, and 7% were extremely bothered. Compared with the reference group ("not at all"), the adjusted mortality HR for patients extremely bothered by pruritus was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.08-1.41). Rates of cardiovascular and infection-related deaths and hospitalizations were also higher for patients extremely versus not at all bothered by pruritus (HR range, 1.17-1.44). Patients extremely bothered by pruritus were also more likely to withdraw from dialysis and miss hemodialysis sessions and were less likely to be employed. Strong monotonic associations were observed between pruritus severity and longer recovery time from a hemodialysis session, lower physical and mental quality of life, increased depressive symptoms, and poorer sleep quality.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounding, recall bias, nonresponse bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate how diverse and far-reaching poor outcomes are for patients who experience CKD-associated pruritus, specifically those with more severe pruritus. There is need for change in practice patterns internationally to effectively identify and treat patients with pruritus to reduce symptom burden and improve quality of life and possibly even survival.

CKD-Associated Pruritus: New Insights Into Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Management

Chronic kidney disease–associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common, troubling and in some cases debilitating problem for patients with CKD and end-stage renal disease. Despite a prevalence rate of approximately 20% in CKD and 40% in end-stage renal disease, and a clear association with poorer psychosocial and medical outcomes, this condition is often underreported by patients and overlooked by health care providers. This is likely due, in part, to uncertainty regarding its pathogenesis and treatment. Most commonly, CKD-aP is attributed to toxin build-up, peripheral neuropathy, immune system dysregulation, or opioid dysregulation. Prior treatment studies of CKD-aP have targeted these potential etiologies but have been limited by noncontrolled design, small sample size, and non-uniform definitions of CKD-aP. Recently, several large, randomized controlled trials targeting opioid dysregulation have yielded promising results. These trials have spurred new hope for understanding and treating this condition.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Difelikefalin for Chronic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction

There is an unmet medical need for pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease, a distressing complication characterized by generalized and persistent itch affecting 20% to 40% of patients undergoing hemodialysis. Here we report the results of a phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel peripherally restricted kappa opioid receptor agonist, difelikefalin, in adult patients undergoing hemodialysis with pruritus.

Methods

In this study, 174 hemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe pruritus were randomly assigned to receive difelikefalin (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 μg/kg) or placebo intravenously thrice weekly after each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks in a double-blind, controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline at week 8 in the weekly mean of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale score. The secondary efficacy endpoint was the change in itch-related quality of life measured by the Skindex-10 questionnaire. Other endpoints included safety, sleep quality, and additional measures including the 5-D itch scale.

Results

A significant reduction from baseline in itch intensity scores at week 8 favored all difelikefalin doses combined versus placebo (P = 0.002). Difelikefalin also showed improvement over placebo in Skindex-10, 5-D itch, and sleep disturbance scores (P ≤ 0.005). Overall, 78% of patients receiving difelikefalin reported treatment-emergent adverse events versus 42% of patients given placebo, with diarrhea, dizziness, nausea, somnolence, and fall being the most frequent (≥5%).

Conclusion

In this trial, difelikefalin effectively reduced itching intensity and improved sleep and itch-related quality of life.

A Phase 3 Trial of Difelikefalin in Hemodialysis Patients with Pruritus

BACKGROUND

Difelikefalin is a peripherally restricted and selective agonist of kappa opioid receptors that are considered to be important in modulating pruritus in conditions such as chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing hemodialysis who had moderate-to-severe pruritus to receive either intravenous difelikefalin (at a dose of 0.5 μg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo three times per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an improvement (decrease) of at least 3 points from baseline at week 12 in the weekly mean score on the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater itch intensity). The secondary outcomes included the change from baseline in itch-related quality-of-life measures, the percentage of patients with an improvement of at least 4 points in the WI-NRS score at week 12, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 378 patients underwent randomization. A total of 82 of 158 patients (51.9%) in the difelikefalin group had a decrease of at least 3 points in the WI-NRS score (primary outcome), as compared with 51 of 165 (30.9%) in the placebo group. The imputed percentage of patients with a decrease of at least 3 points in the WI-NRS score was 49.1% in the difelikefalin group, as compared with 27.9% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Difelikefalin also resulted in a significant improvement from baseline to week 12 in itch-related quality of life as measured by the 5-D itch scale and the Skindex-10 scale. The imputed percentage of patients with a decrease of at least 4 points in the WI-NRS score at week 12 was significantly greater in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group (37.1% [observed data: 64 of 158 patients] vs. 17.9% [observed data: 35 of 165 patients], P<0.001). Diarrhea, dizziness, and vomiting were more common in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with difelikefalin had a significant reduction in itch intensity and improved itch-related quality of life as compared with those who received placebo. (Funded by Cara Therapeutics; KALM-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03422653.).