2
|
Kidszun A, Forth FA, Matheisl D, Busch F, Kaltbeitzel L, Kurz S. Ethics education in pediatrics: Implementation and evaluation of an interactive online course for medical students. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 39:Doc55. [PMID: 36540566 PMCID: PMC9733484 DOI: 10.3205/zma001576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the development of online learning formats in virtually all areas of medical education. In pediatric ethics, online learning may not only substitute but also offer specific advantages over traditional classroom teaching. Many pediatricians rate their ethics education as poor and medical ethics education lacks evaluation, especially regarding the students' needs. The aim of this project was to implement and evaluate a novel interactive distance learning approach to engage medical students in pediatric ethics education. METHODS An online ethics course was designed and delivered between May and June 2020. Core item of this course was a moderated, written forum discussion spanning several days. Evaluation was mixed methods. We evaluated the effectiveness of the course in terms of quality of the learning environment with a particular focus on relevance to students as well as interactive learning and reflective thinking. The Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (COLLES) was used to evaluate six different domains of the course. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation [SD]). The respective score range is 1-5, whereby a score of 4 or 5 means that the participants indicated the corresponding item as frequently or almost always present. RESULTS Responses were available from 104 (78.3%) of the 133 participating students. "Relevance" yielded a score of 4.17 (0.83), "reflective thinking" a score of 4.22 (0.83). "Interactivity" was scored 3.76 (0.99) and "tutor support" 4.72 (0.53). "Peer support" and "interpretation" scored 3.87 (0.98) and 4.49 (0.60), respectively. In qualitative analysis, students particularly valued the structure of the course, the relevance for their professional practice, their active participation and the incentive to reflective thinking. Students also indicated that this was an innovative and exciting format, which fills a current educational gap and should hence be continued beyond the pandemic. CONCLUSION In conclusion, students actively engaged in online learning and perceived this ethics course as highly relevant for their professional practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Kidszun
- Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, University Medical Center, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neonatology, Germany
- University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fiona A. Forth
- Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, University Medical Center, Institute for the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, DFG-Research Training Group “Life Sciences – Life Writing”, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Matheisl
- Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Center for Pediatrics, Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Franziska Busch
- University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lara Kaltbeitzel
- Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, University Medical Center, Rudolf Frey Lernklinik, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sandra Kurz
- Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, University Medical Center, Rudolf Frey Lernklinik, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Serrano-Zamago AB, Altamirano-Bustamante MM. Appealing to Tacit Knowledge and Axiology to Enhance Medical Practice in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Hermeneutic Bioethical Analysis. Front Public Health 2021; 9:686773. [PMID: 34956997 PMCID: PMC8692268 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.686773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The pressure of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, epidemiological and demographic changes, personnel-patient relationship in healthcare, and the development of biotechnologies do not go unnoticed by the healthcare professional. Changes are so wide and at a high rate that guidelines and mere scientific knowledge, which are represented by evidence-based medicine, are not sufficient to lead actions, thus the experiential aspects in the configuration of an ethos present as a fundamental part of the resources to deal with critical scenarios, such as a pandemic. In this regard, the recognition of tacit knowledge as a way of teaching and learning skills related to ethical aspects such as principles, virtues, and values, revealed as a fundamental part of the clinical field. The challenge is to strengthen binomial evidence-based medicine and values-based in order to achieve excellence in the health care of the patients and the well-being of the clinical personnel. Method: A 2-fold analysis was conducted taking pediatric endocrinology as an example. First, a systematic review was carried out in electronic databases BIREME, PubMed, and PhilPapers following PEO and PRISMA approaches. A total of 132 articles were garnered. After reading their title and abstract, 30 articles were obtained. Quantitative information was arranged in an Excel database according to three themes: ethics, axiology, and tacit knowledge. A quality criterion that meets our research question was assigned to each article and those which had a quality criterion of 3 (9) were taken to carry out the hermeneutic bioethical analysis, which consisted of three stages, namely naïve reading, codification, and interpretation. The results were analyzed in Atlas.ti. to elucidate the relations between the three main themes in accordance with the objective. Results: Although there was no difference in the frequency of tacit knowledge skills, including cognitive, social, and technical, for medical practice, there is an intrinsic relationship between epistemic and ethical values with cognitive skills, this means that professionals who practice honesty, authenticity and self-control are capable of seeing patients as persons and thus respect their dignity. This suggested that there is a strong partnership between evidence-based medicine and value-based medicine, which reinforced this binomial as the two feet on which medical practice decisions rested. With regard to tacit knowledge in terms of the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the challenges refer to (1) adapting and learning a new way of establishing trust with the patient and (2) how to capitalize on the new knowledge that new experiences have posed. Discussion: The analysis of ethical-tacit knowledge in medicine is a recent phenomenon and is in full development. Although no references were found that dealt with any of the main topics in pediatric endocrinology, there is an interest in pediatrics to explore and discuss educational strategies in ethics related to its tacit dimension as a vector of enhancement in the clinical practice. Educational strategies ought to take into consideration the development of skills that promote reflection and discussion of experiences, even more vigorously in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Beatriz Serrano-Zamago
- Grupo Transfuncional en Bioética, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.,Master and Doctorate Program in Medical and Health Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.,Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
- Grupo Transfuncional en Bioética, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.,Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Metabólicas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hong DZ, Goh JL, Ong ZY, Ting JJQ, Wong MK, Wu J, Tan XH, Toh RQE, Chiang CLL, Ng CWH, Ng JCK, Ong YT, Cheong CWS, Tay KT, Tan LHS, Phua GLG, Fong W, Wijaya L, Neo SHS, Lee ASI, Chiam M, Chin AMC, Krishna LKR. Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:338. [PMID: 34107935 PMCID: PMC8188952 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molding competent clinicians capable of applying ethics principles in their practice is a challenging task, compounded by wide variations in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. Despite these differences, ethics training programs should recognise that the transition from medical students to healthcare professionals entails a longitudinal process where ethics knowledge, skills and identity continue to build and deepen over time with clinical exposure. A systematic scoping review is proposed to analyse current postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment programs in peer-reviewed literature to guide the development of a local physician training curriculum. METHODS With a constructivist perspective and relativist lens, this systematic scoping review on postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment will adopt the Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to create a transparent and reproducible review. RESULTS The first search involving the teaching of ethics yielded 7669 abstracts with 573 full text articles evaluated and 66 articles included. The second search involving the assessment of ethics identified 9919 abstracts with 333 full text articles reviewed and 29 articles included. The themes identified from the two searches were the goals and objectives, content, pedagogy, enabling and limiting factors of teaching ethics and assessment modalities used. Despite inherent disparities in ethics training programs, they provide a platform for learners to apply knowledge, translating it to skill and eventually becoming part of the identity of the learner. Illustrating the longitudinal nature of ethics training, the spiral curriculum seamlessly integrates and fortifies prevailing ethical knowledge acquired in medical school with the layering of new specialty, clinical and research specific content in professional practice. Various assessment methods are employed with special mention of portfolios as a longitudinal assessment modality that showcase the impact of ethics training on the development of professional identity formation (PIF). CONCLUSIONS Our systematic scoping review has elicited key learning points in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. However, more research needs to be done on establishing Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)s in ethics, with further exploration of the use of portfolios and key factors influencing its design, implementation and assessment of PIF and micro-credentialling in ethics practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Zhihao Hong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Jia Ling Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Zhi Yang Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Mun Kit Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Jiaxuan Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Xiu Hui Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Rachelle Qi En Toh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Christine Li Ling Chiang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Caleb Wei Hao Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Jared Chuan Kai Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Laura Hui Shuen Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
| | - Warren Fong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, 16 College Road, Block 6 Level 9, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169854 Singapore
| | - Limin Wijaya
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608 Singapore
| | - Shirlyn Hui Shan Neo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Alexia Sze Inn Lee
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of Singapore Libraries, Blk MD6, Centre, 14 Medical Dr, #05-01 for Translational Medicine, Singapore, 117599 Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, L3 9TA Liverpool, UK
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077 Singapore
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436 Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morrison W, Womer J, Nathanson P, Kersun L, Hester DM, Walsh C, Feudtner C. Pediatricians' Experience with Clinical Ethics Consultation: A National Survey. J Pediatr 2015. [PMID: 26210945 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a national survey of pediatricians' access to and experience with clinical ethics consultation. STUDY DESIGN We surveyed a randomly selected sample of 3687 physician members of the American Academy of Pediatrics. We asked about their experiences with ethics consultation, the helpfulness of and barriers to consultation, and ethics education. Using a discrete choice experiment with maximum difference scaling, we evaluated which traits of ethics consultants were most valuable. RESULTS Of the total sample of 3687 physicians, 659 (18%) responded to the survey. One-third of the respondents had no experience with clinical ethics consultation, and 16% reported no access to consultation. General pediatricians were less likely to have access. The vast majority (90%) who had experience with consultation had found it helpful. Those with fewer years in practice were more likely to have training in ethics. The most frequently reported issues leading to consultation concerned end-of-life care and conflicts with patients/families or among the team. Intensive care unit physicians were more likely to have requested consultation. Mediation skills and ethics knowledge were the most highly valued consultant characteristics, and representing the official position of the hospital was the least-valued characteristic. CONCLUSION There is variability in pediatricians' access to ethics consultation. Most respondents reported that consultation had been helpful in the past. Determining ethically appropriate end-of-life care and mediation of disagreements are common reasons that pediatricians request consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wynne Morrison
- Pediatric Advanced Care Team, Department of Medical Ethics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - James Womer
- Pediatric Advanced Care Team, Department of Medical Ethics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Pamela Nathanson
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leslie Kersun
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - D Micah Hester
- Division of Medical Humanities, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Corbett Walsh
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Chris Feudtner
- Pediatric Advanced Care Team, Department of Medical Ethics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|