Multisite Retrospective Review of Outcomes in Renal Replacement Therapy for Neonates with Inborn Errors of Metabolism

Inborn errors of metabolism in neonates and pediatrics on varying dialysis modalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Some inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) resulting in aberrations to blood leucine and ammonia levels are commonly treated with kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Children with IEMs require prompt treatment, as delayed treatment results in increased neurological and developmental morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

Our systematic review in neonates and pediatrics evaluates survival rates and reductions in ammonia and leucine levels across different KRT modalities (continuous KRT (CKRT), hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD)).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for articles including survival rate and toxic metabolite clearance data in pediatric patients with IEM undergoing KRT.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cross-sectional, prospective, and retrospective studies with survival rates reported in patients with IEM with an intervention of CKRT, PD, or HD were included. Studies with patients receiving unclear or multiple KRT modalities were excluded.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Analysis variables included efficacy outcomes [% reduction in ammonia (RIA) from pre- to post-dialysis and time to 50% RIA] and mortality. The Newcastle Ottawa Risk of Bias quality assessment was used to assess bias. All statistical analyses were performed with MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.2.6.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies (n = 642) were included. The pooled proportion (95% CI) of mortality on CKRT was 24.84% (20.93-29.08), PD was 34.42% (26.24-43.33), and HD 34.14% (24.19-45.23). A lower trend of pooled (95% CI) time to 50% RIA was observed with CKRT [6.5 (5.1-7.8)] vs. PD [14.4 (13.3-15.5)]. A higher mortality was observed with greater plasma ammonia level before CKRT (31.94% for ≥ 1000 µmol/L vs. 15.04% for < 1000 µmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Despite the limitations in sample size, trends emerged suggesting that CKRT may be associated with lower mortality rates compared to HD or PD, with potential benefits including prevention of rebound hyperammonemia and improved hemodynamic control. While HD showed a trend towards faster achievement of 50% RIA, all modalities demonstrated comparable efficacy in reducing ammonia and leucine levels.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42023418842.

Continuous renal replacement therapy for severe transient hyperammonemia in a preterm infant weighing 1120 g: A case report

Transient hyperammonemia of the newborn is a rare form of hyperammonemia with an unclear, likely nongenetic etiology, primarily affecting larger preterm infants. However, lower birth weight and gestational age are associated with higher ammonia levels, increasing the risk of neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Transient hyperammonemia of the newborn typically manifests as respiratory distress within the first 24 h post-birth, progressing to seizures and coma within 48 h. Continuous renal replacement therapy has demonstrated considerable efficacy in managing severe transient hyperammonemia of the newborn due to its high ammonia clearance rate; however, its application remains limited in very low birth weight preterm infants. Herein, we report the case of a male infant born at 28+2 weeks gestation, weighing 1120 g, who developed transient hyperammonemia of the newborn 22 h post-birth. Despite initial pharmacotherapy and peritoneal dialysis, his ammonia levels continued to rise, necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy. After 42 h of continuous renal replacement therapy, his ammonia levels decreased significantly and he recovered fully, eventually being discharged in good health. This case highlights continuous renal replacement therapy as a viable, life-saving intervention for severe transient hyperammonemia of the newborn, even in very low birth weight preterm infants.

Extracorporeal pediatric renal replacement therapy: diversifying application beyond kidney failure

The utilization of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy (RRT), including continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and hemodialysis (HD), beyond the treatment of volume overload and acute kidney injury (AKI) has witnessed a significant shift, demonstrating the potential to improve patient outcomes for a range of diseases. This comprehensive review explores the non-kidney applications for RRT platforms in critically ill children, focusing on diverse clinical scenarios such as sepsis, inborn errors of metabolism, liver failure, drug overdose, tumor lysis syndrome, and rhabdomyolysis. In the context of sepsis and septic shock, RRT not only facilitates fluid, electrolyte, and acid/base homeostasis, but may offer benefits in cytokine regulation, endotoxin clearance, and immunomodulation which may improve multi-organ dysfunction as well as hemodynamic challenges posed by this life-threatening condition. RRT modalities also have an important role in caring for children with inborn errors of metabolism, liver failure, and tumor lysis syndrome as they can control metabolic derangements with the efficient clearance of endogenous toxins in affected children. In cases of drug overdose, RRT is a crucial tool for rapid extracorporeal clearance of exogenous toxins, mitigating potential organ damage. The intricate interplay between liver failure and kidney function is examined, elucidating the role of RRT and plasma exchange in maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance when hepatic dysfunction complicates the clinical picture. Furthermore, RRT and HD are explored in the context of rhabdomyolysis, highlighting their utility in addressing AKI secondary to traumatic events and crush syndrome.

Recent Advances in Kidney Replacement Therapy in Infants: A Review

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is used to treat children and adults with acute kidney injury (AKI), fluid overload, kidney failure, inborn errors of metabolism, and severe electrolyte abnormalities. Peritoneal dialysis and extracorporeal hemodialysis/filtration can be performed for different durations (intermittent, prolonged intermittent, and continuous) through either adaptation of adult devices or use of infant-specific devices. Each of these modalities have advantages and disadvantages, and often multiple modalities are used depending on the scenario and patient-specific needs. Traditionally, these therapies have been challenging to deliver in infants due the lack of infant-specific devices, small patient size, required extracorporeal volumes, and the risk of hemodynamic stability during the initiation of KRT. In this review, we discuss challenges, recent advancements, and optimal approaches to provide KRT in hospitalized infants, including a discussion of peritoneal dialysis and extracorporeal therapies. We discuss each specific KRT modality, review newer infant-specific devices, and highlight the benefits and limitations of each modality. We also discuss the ethical implications for the care of infants who need KRT and areas for future research.

Real-life effects, complications, and outcomes in 39 critically ill neonates receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) has been expanded from simple kidney replacement therapy to the field of critical illness in children. However, CKRT is rarely used in critically ill neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This study aimed to describe patients' clinical characteristics at admission and CKRT initiation, CKRT effects, short-term outcomes, and predictors of death in critically ill neonates.

METHODS

A 7-year single-center retrospective study in a tertiary NICU.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine critically ill neonates received CKRT between May 2015 and April 2022 with a mortality rate of 35.9%. The most common primary diagnosis was neonatal sepsis in 15 cases (38.5%). Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration were applied in 43.6% and 56.4% of neonates, respectively. The duration of CKRT was 44 (18, 72) h. Thirty-one patients (79.5%) had complications due to CKRT-related adverse events, and the most common complication was thrombocytopenia. Approximately 12 h after the CKRT initiation, urine volume, mean arterial pressure, and pH were increased, and serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and blood lactate were decreased. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, neonatal critical illness score [odds ratio 0.886 (0.786 ~ 0.998), P = 0.046] was an independent risk factor for death in critically ill neonates who received CKRT.

CONCLUSIONS

CKRT can be an effective and feasible technique in critically ill neonates, but the overall mortality and CKRT-related complications are relatively high. Furthermore, the probability of death is greater among neonates with greater severity of illness at CKRT initiation. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hyperammonemia]

Neonatal hyperammonemia is a disorder of ammonia metabolism that occurs in the neonatal period. It is a clinical syndrome characterized by abnormal accumulation of ammonia in the blood and dysfunction of the central nervous system. Due to its low incidence and lack of specificity in clinical manifestations, it is easy to cause misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. In order to further standardize the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hyperammonemia, the Youth Commission, Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association formulated the expert consensus based on clinical evidence in China and overseas and combined with clinical practice experience,and put forward 18 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hyperaminemia.

Debate: Intermittent Hemodialysis versus Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Critically Ill Patient: The Argument for CKRT

Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is well entrenched as one of the dominant KRT modalities in modern critical care practice. Since its introduction four decades ago, there have been considerable innovations in CKRT machines that have improved precision, safety, and simplicity. CKRT is the preferred KRT modality for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability. Early physical therapy and rehabilitation can be feasibly and safely provided to patients connected to CKRT, thus obviating concerns about immobility. Although randomized clinical trials have not shown a mortality difference when comparing CKRT and intermittent hemodialysis, CKRT allows precision delivery of solute and fluid removal that can be readily adjusted in the face of dynamic circumstances. Accumulated evidence from observational studies, although susceptible to bias, has shown that CKRT, when compared with intermittent hemodialysis, is associated with better short- and long-term kidney recovery and KRT independence. Critical care medicine encompasses a wide range of sick patients, and no single KRT modality is likely to ideally suit every patient in every context and for every condition. The provision of KRT represents a spectrum of modalities to which patients can flexibly transition in response to their evolving condition. As a vital tool for organ support in the intensive care unit, CKRT enables the personalization of KRT to meet the clinical demands of patients during the most severe phases of their illness.