Multistakeholder Perspectives on Interventions to Support Youth During Mental Health Boarding

Human-Centered Design to Improve Care for Youths Experiencing Psychiatric Boarding

The number of children and adolescents presenting to hospitals with mental health conditions has increased markedly over the past decade. A dearth of pediatric mental health resources prevents delivering definitive psychiatric care to this population at many hospitals; thus, children and adolescents must wait at a medical facility until appropriate psychiatric care becomes available (an experience described as psychiatric "boarding"). Clinicians caring for youth experiencing psychiatric boarding report inadequate training and resources to provide high-quality care to this population, and patients and caregivers describe significant frustration with the current standard of care. Recognizing these issues and the unique emotional components associated with psychiatric boarding, we employed human-centered design (HCD) to improve our hospital's approach to caring for youth during this period. HCD is an approach that specifically prioritizes the assessment and integration of human needs, including emotional needs, as a means to inform change. We used an HCD framework encompassing 5 stages: (1) empathize with those affected by the issue at hand, (2) define the problem, (3) ideate potential solutions, (4) prototype potential solutions, and (5) test potential solutions. Through these stages, we elicited broad stakeholder engagement to develop and implement 2 primary interventions: A modular digital health curriculum to teach psychosocial skills to youth experiencing boarding and a comprehensive clinical practice guideline to optimize and standardize care across clinical environments at our hospital. This manuscript describes our experience applying HCD principles to this complex health care challenge.

Pediatric mental health emergency department visits from 2017 to 2022: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected children's mental health (MH) and changed patterns of MH emergency department (ED) utilization. Our objective was to assess how pediatric MH ED visits during the COVID-19 pandemic differed from expected prepandemic trends.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied MH ED visits by children 5 to <18 years old at nine U.S. hospitals participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry from 2017 to 2022. We described visit length by time period: prepandemic (January 2017-February 2020), early pandemic (March 2020-December 2020), midpandemic (2021), and late pandemic (2022). We estimated expected visit rates from prepandemic data using multivariable Poisson regression models. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) of observed to expected visits per 30 days during each pandemic time period, overall and by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 175,979 pediatric MH ED visits. Visit length exceeded 12 h for 7.3% prepandemic, 8.4% early pandemic, 15.0% midpandemic, and 19.2% late pandemic visits. During the early pandemic, observed visits per 30 days decreased relative to expected rates (RR 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.84), were similar to expected rates during the midpandemic (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.07), and then decreased below expected rates during the late pandemic (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98). During the late pandemic, visit rates were higher than expected for females (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20) and for bipolar disorders (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.38-2.75), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.10-2.59), and substance-related and addictive disorders (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18-2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

During the late pandemic, pediatric MH ED visits decreased below expected rates; however, visits by females and for specific conditions remained elevated, indicating a need for increased attention to these groups. Prolonged ED visit lengths may reflect inadequate availability of MH services.

Emergency department visits and boarding for pediatric patients with suicidality before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the increase in pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department with suicidality before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the subsequent impact on emergency department length of stay and boarding.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study from June 1, 2016, to October 31, 2022, identified patients ages 6 to 21 presenting to the emergency department at a pediatric academic medical center with suicidality using ICD-10 codes. Number of emergency department encounters for suicidality, demographic characteristics of patients with suicidality, and emergency department length of stay were compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unobserved components models were used to describe monthly counts of emergency department encounters for suicidality.

RESULTS

There were 179,736 patient encounters to the emergency department during the study period, 6,215 (3.5%) for suicidality. There were, on average, more encounters for suicidality each month during the COVID-19 pandemic than before the COVID-19 pandemic. A time series unobserved components model demonstrated a temporary drop of 32.7 encounters for suicidality in April and May of 2020 (p<0.001), followed by a sustained increase of 31.2 encounters starting in July 2020 (p = 0.003). The average length of stay for patients that boarded in the emergency department with a diagnosis of suicidality was 37.4 hours longer during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of encounters for suicidality among pediatric patients and the emergency department length of stay for psychiatry boarders has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need for acute care mental health services and solutions to emergency department capacity issues.

I-CARE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Appropriateness of a Digital Health Intervention for Youth Experiencing Mental Health Boarding

PURPOSE

Youth with suicidality requiring psychiatric hospitalization may first experience boarding at acute care hospitals. Given infrequent provision of therapy during this period, we developed a modular digital intervention (I-CARE; Improving Care, Accelerating Recovery and Education) to facilitate delivery of evidence-based psychosocial skills by non-mental health clinicians. This pilot study describes changes in emotional distress, severity of illness, and readiness for engagement following I-CARE participation, and evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of I-CARE.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate I-CARE, offered to youth 12-17 years from 11/21 to 06/22. Changes in emotional distress, severity of illness, and engagement readiness were evaluated using paired t-tests. Semistructured interviews with youth, caregivers, and clinicians were conducted concurrently with collection of validated implementation outcome measures. Quantitative measure results were linked to interview transcripts, which were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Twenty-four adolescents participated in I-CARE; median length of stay was 8 days (IQR:5-12 days). Emotional distress decreased significantly by 6.3 points (63-point scale) following participation (p = .02). The increase in engagement readiness and decrease in youth-reported illness severity were not statistically significant. Among 40 youth, caregivers, and clinicians who participated in the mixed-methods evaluation, 39 (97.5%) rated I-CARE as feasible, 36 (90.0%) as acceptable, and 31 (77.5%) as appropriate. Adolescents' prior knowledge of psychosocial skills and clinicians' competing demands were reported barriers.

DISCUSSION

I-CARE was feasible to implement and youth reported reduced levels of distress following participation. I-CARE has the potential to teach evidence-based psychosocial skills during boarding, which may provide a head-start on recovery before psychiatric hospitalization.