A single center 26-year experience with treatment of esophageal achalasia: is there an optimal method?

Protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing treatment success and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs endoscopic balloon dilation for the treatment of achalasia in children

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone and absence of esophageal peristalsis. Achalasia requires invasive treatment in all patients. Conventional treatment options include endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) and laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM). Recently, a less invasive endoscopic therapy has been developed; Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). POEM integrates the theoretical advantages of both EBD and LHM (no skin incisions, less pain, short hospital stay, less blood loss and a durable myotomy). Our aim is to compare efficacy and safety of POEM vs. EBD as primary treatment for achalasia in children.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multi-center, and center-stratified block-randomized controlled trial will assess safety and efficacy of POEM vs EBD. Primary outcome measure is the need for retreatment due to treatment failure (i.e. persisting symptoms (Eckardt score > 3) with evidence of recurrence on barium swallow and/or HRM within 12 months follow-up) as assed by a blinded end-point committee (PROBE design).

DISCUSSION

This RCT will be the first one to evaluate which endoscopic therapy is most effective and safe for treatment of naïve pediatric patients with achalasia.

Comparison of Endoscopic Dilatation and Heller's Myotomy for Treating Esophageal Achalasia in Children: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of, and complications from, the 2 main treatments for achalasia: endoscopic dilatation and surgical cardiomyotomy (Heller's myotomy).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively collected data on children treated for achalasia over an 11-year period from 8 tertiary pediatric centers. A line of treatment was defined as performing either Heller's myotomy or 1-3 sessions of endoscopy dilatation over 3 months. Treatment success was a priori defined as clinical improvement and no need for new treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven children (median age, 12 years; 57% boys) were included. The median time to diagnosis was 10.5 months, and the median follow-up period was 27 months. Thirty-seven children were treated by Heller's myotomy and 60 by endoscopy dilatation as the first-line treatment. After adjustment for potentially confounding factors, Heller's myotomy was significantly more successful than endoscopy dilatation (hazard ratio, 3.93 [1.74; 8.88]; P = .001), with a median survival without failure of 49 and 7 months, respectively, and with no significant difference in the occurrence of complications (35.2% for Heller's myotomy, 29.7% for endoscopy dilatation, P = .56). Hydrostatic dilatation was as successful as pneumatic dilatation (hazard ratio, 1.35 [0.56; 3.23]; P = .50).

CONCLUSIONS

Heller's myotomy is more successful than endoscopy dilatation, with no significant difference in the occurrence of serious complications. This raises the potential role of peroral endoscopic myotomy as an alternative treatment to Heller's myotomy.

Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols reduces opioid use in pediatric laparoscopic Heller myotomy surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are effective means of standardizing and improving the quality of surgical care in adults. Our purpose was to retrospectively compare outcomes before and after implementation of ERPs in children undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

METHODS

A pediatric-specific ERP was used for children undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy starting July 2017 at two pediatric surgery centers within a single metropolitan healthcare system. A retrospective review of 8 patients undergoing Heller myotomies between July 2014 and July 2017 was performed as a control. This cohort was compared to 14 patients managed post-ERP implementation (2017-2020). Outcomes of interest investigated included opioid use during admission, narcotics at discharge, time to regular diet, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in opioid use both while in the hospital and at time of discharge. Mean morphine equivalent use was 4.50 mg in the pre-ERP cohort and 1.97 mg in the post-ERP cohort. Furthermore, 8 out of 14 (57%) patients in the post-ERP cohort received no opioids during the admission compared with only 2 out of 8 (25%) patients in the pre-ERP cohort. Only 1 out of 14 (7.14%) patients in the post-ERP cohort was discharged with a prescription for opioid medication while 6 out of 8 (75%) in the pre-ERP cohort were discharged with an opiate prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ERP in children undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy surgery is safe and effective and leads to a reduction in opioid use during admission and at discharge.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Childhood esophageal achalasia: Case report from Afghanistan with literature review

Introduction and importance

Esophageal achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus with unknown etiology characterized by the failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Diagnosis is made by barium esophagography, endoscopy, and esophageal manometery. Heller Esophagomyotomy along with Dor's fundoplication is the treatment of choice. Persisting undiagnosed cases may lead to malnutrition.

Case presentation

We present a case of an 8-year-old child suffering from dysphagia and regurgitation. The child was misdiagnosed and maltreated for the suspicion of respiratory tract and gastrointestinal problems in the local clinics. During this time, he remained unresponsive to the mentioned treatments, and the local physician advised him to have an upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, which revealed esophageal achalasia (EA).

On admission to our pediatric surgery ward, the patient had coexistent parotitis, which was treated conservatively. Following recovery, the patient was prepared for surgery and underwent esophageal myotomy along with Dor's fundoplication.

Clinical discussion

Esophageal achalasia is rare in children, but poses major health challenges to children if left untreated. Symptomatic treatment may mask the actual picture of the problem and last for years. Following surgery and discharge from the hospital in a three-month follow-up interval of time, our patient exhibited full recovery, with gaining 4 kg weight.

Conclusions

Respiratory and gastrointestinal conditions with similar signs and symptoms should always be considered in differential diagnosis of esophageal achalasia, especially where there is no direct access to a pediatric specialized complex. On-time evaluation and treatment will further prevent children from malnutrition in long-lasting undiagnosed patients.

•

Esophageal achalasia is a motility disorder with unknown etiology.

•

Esophageal achalasia is rare in children.

•

Dysphagia and respiratory infection will mask the actual picture of the problem.

•

Unprofessional symptomatic treatment for a long time is the main cause of undiagnosed patient and may lead to malnutrition.

Pneumatic dilation for esophageal achalasia: patient selection and perspectives

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment is palliative, aimed at decreasing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia. Several other invasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities, such as Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), also have a comparable safety and efficacy profile to PD. The current review focuses on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and outcomes of PD in various patient populations and its comparison to LHM and POEM. This review also provides relevant information to help endoscopists identify those patients who will benefit the most from PD.

Upper Gastrointestinal Functional and Motility Disorders in Children

Children with disorders affecting the sensory and motor functions of the esophagus will present primarily with swallowing dysfunction, dysphagia, and chest pain, and those with disorders affecting the normal function of the stomach will present with symptoms like abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Recent advances in the mechanisms of disease and technology have increased our understanding of gastrointestinal physiology and that knowledge has been applied to develop new diagnostic studies and therapeutic interventions. We present an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of common primary and secondary functional and motility disorders affecting the upper gastrointestinal tract in children.

Achalasia in Children-Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, Long-Term Treatment Outcomes, and Quality of Life

Background: In spite of the introduction of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), Heller myotomy (HM) remains the mainstay of treatment and the role of pneumatic dilatation (PD) is being debated. The aim of this study was to present a single-center experience in the diagnostic approach and treatment of esophageal achalasia (EA), including the long-term assessment of the QoL. Methods: Data collection was based on the retrospective analysis of clinical notes and prospective interviews with patients and their parents. Results: The study group consisted of 60 patients with EA (F: 26, M: 34), with a median age of 12.0 (1–17) years at diagnosis. The time from the first symptoms until the diagnosis was 1.0 year (0.5–2.0) and the most common were: regurgitation (91.3%), dysphagia (84.8%), and chest pain (47.8%). The diagnostic approach showed a high sensitivity for barium X-ray follow through, esophageal manometry, and endoscopy. Overall, a long-term good outcome of HM was achieved in 27 out of 37 patients (73%) and it was negatively affected by the time between the first symptoms and the diagnosis. Out of the 16 patients who underwent PD before HM, a good outcome was achieved in 14 patients (87.5%), compared to 13 out of 21 patients (62%) who only underwent HM (p = 0.22). Concomitant fundoplication was routinely performed, and 18% required post-operative endoscopic dilatation. At the end of the 12.1 (0.7–26.6)-year follow up, most patients had a good QoL, which significantly corresponded with the treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Patients suspected of EA should undergo a thorough clinical evaluation including a manometry, a barium X-ray, and an endoscopy. HM is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia and the outcome is not worsened by a preceding endoscopic PD. In most patients, HM alleviates symptoms, although an impaired QoL is common in long-term follow ups.

Multicenter Evaluation with Eckardt Score of Laparoscopic Management with Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication for Esophageal Achalasia in a Pediatric Population in Colombia

Background: Esophageal achalasia is a rare, chronic, and progressive neurodegenerative motility disorder that is characterized by a lack of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is the ideal in our population. Multiple surgical and medical treatments have been raised. However, there has been a need to expand studies and generate a clear algorithm for an ideal therapeutic algorithm. Methods: Clinical record was retrospectively analyzed of patients who underwent LHM and Dor fundoplication evaluated with Eckardt score, at four Colombian medical centers between February 2008 and December 2018. Results: There were a total of 21 patients (12 males and 9 females, ages 8 months to 16 years). The time from onset of symptoms to surgery was between 5 months and 14 years. One patient had esophageal mucosa perforation, 2 patients were converted to open surgery, and 1 patient had a postoperative fistula. All patients were discharged 3 to 9 days postoperatively, at which time they tolerated normal oral feeding. During follow-up, all the patients had an improvement in nutritional status and a greater functional recovery; 4 had reflux and 1 had reflux-like symptoms. Conclusion: LHM with Dor-type fundoplication maintains the effectiveness of open surgery with low postoperative morbidity and mortality and good functional results according to Eckardt score evaluation.

Clinical Management of Pediatric Achalasia: A Survey of Current Practice

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative disorder of the esophagus that requires treatment. Different diagnostic and treatment modalities are available, but there are no data that show how children can best be diagnosed and treated. We aimed to identify current practices regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic approach toward children with achalasia.

METHODS

Information on the current practice regarding the management of pediatric achalasia was collected by an online-based survey sent to members of the European and North American Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition involved in pediatric achalasia care.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 38 centers from 24 countries. Within these centers, 108 children were diagnosed with achalasia in the last year (median 2, range 0-15). Achalasia was primarily managed by a pediatric gastroenterologist (76%) and involved a multidisciplinary team in 84% of centers, also including a surgeon (87%), radiologist (61%), dietician (37%), speech pathologist (8%), and psychologist (5%). Medical history taking and physical examination were considered most important to establish the diagnosis (50%), followed by (a combination of) manometry (45%) or contrast swallow (21%). Treatment of first choice was Heller myotomy (58%), followed by pneumatic dilation (46%) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (29%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a great heterogeneity in the management of pediatric achalasia amongst different centers worldwide. These findings stress the need for well-designed intervention trials in children with achalasia. Given the rarity of this disease, we recommend that achalasia care should be managed in centers with access to appropriate diagnostic and treatment modalities.

The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines

Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.

Obstructive bronchitis and recurrent pneumonia in esophageal achalasia in a child: A CARE compliant case report

RATIONALE

Esophageal achalasia is characterized by impaired relaxation of the cardia and dilation of the intrathoracic part of the esophagus. We describe the late presentation of achalasia in an 11-year old girl.

PATIENT CONCERNS

She suffered from recurrent pneumonia, obstructive bronchitis, and problems with swallowing solid food. Her family noted a wet pillow in the morning.

DIAGNOSES

This case report describes the typical symptoms of achalasia in children in order to facilitate earlier diagnosis of this rare disease. Our patient was admitted to a pediatric hospital for treatment of severe pneumonia, low-grade fever, and pancreatitis. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax showed massive dilation of the esophagus and infiltration and partial atelectasis of the right lung. An upper gastrointestinal contrast study confirmed massive dilation of the esophagus and stenosis at the level of the cardia.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed laparoscopic Heller myotomy combined with Dor fundoplication. Bronchoscopic lavages were conducted in the pre- and postoperative period to relief obstruction of bronchi by purulent mucus secretions.

OUTCOMES

A further upper gastrointestinal contrast study demonstrated patency of the cardia and fast propulsive movement of contrast agent into the stomach. At follow up 2 months after the operation, the girl had gained 3 kg of body weight, and her respiratory, gastrointestinal, and swallowing symptoms had subsided. At follow-up 12 months after the operation, no recurrent symptoms of achalasia were recorded.

LESSONS

Late presentation of achalasia in children can mimic respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy combined with Dor fundoplication is feasible and advisable in children suffering from achalasia of the cardia.

Clinical management of pediatric achalasia

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder. Much of the literature is based on the adult population. In adults, guidance of therapeutic approach by manometric findings has led to improvement in patient outcome. Promising results have been achieved with novel therapies such as PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of the novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools for achalasia management and in what way they will relate to the future management of pediatric achalasia. We performed a PubMed and EMBASE search of English literature on achalasia using the keywords 'children', 'achalasia', 'pneumatic dilation', 'myotomy' and 'POEM'. Cohort studies < 10 cases and studies describing patients ≥ 20 years were excluded. Data regarding patient characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were extracted and presented descriptively, or pooled when possible. Expert commentary: Available data report that pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic Heller's myotomy are effective in children, with certain studies suggesting lower success rates in pneumatic dilation. POEM is increasingly used in the pediatric setting with promising short-term results. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) may occur post-achalasia intervention due to disruption of the LES and therefore requires diligent follow-up, especially in children treated with POEM.

Long-term outcomes of Heller's myotomy and balloon dilatation in childhood achalasia

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder: its optimal treatment in children is still a matter of debate. Records of children treated for achalasia, over an 18-year period, were reviewed.Forty-eight children (median age at diagnosis 10 years; range 3-17 years) were identified. Twenty-eight patients were initially treated with Heller's myotomy (HM) and 20 with balloon dilatation (BD). At last follow-up (median 3 years; range 1-5.5 years), 43.8% (21/48) of children were symptom free. The number of asymptomatic children was significantly higher among those treated initially with HM compared to BD (HM 15/28, 53.6% BD 6/20, 30%, p < 0.05). All children who underwent BD required HM due to symptom recurrence. The median (range) total number of procedures was significantly higher in the BD group (BD 3 (1-7); HM 1 (1-5); p < 0.05) with a shorter time to the second intervention (BD 14 months, 95%CI 4-24; HM 58 months, 95%CI 38-79; p < 0.05). Of 108 procedures, esophageal perforation occurred in two children after HM (two out of 48 HM procedures in total, 4%) and one child after BD (1/60, 1.7%).

CONCLUSION

Less than half of children with achalasia are symptom free after initial treatment with either BD or HM. HM, however, when performed as first procedure, provided longer symptom-free period and reduced need for subsequent intervention. What is Known: • Balloon dilatation (BD) and Heller's myotomy (HM) are safe and effective treatment options for achalasia. • Controversy, however, exists regarding the most effective initial therapeutic approach. What is New: • HM with or without fundoplication may represent the initial therapeutic approach of choice. • Initial BD may negatively affect the outcome of a subsequent HM.

Achalasia

Achalasia is a rare neurogenic motility disorder of the esophagus, occurring in approximately 0.11 cases per 100,000 children. The combination of problems (aperistalsis, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and lack of receptive LES relaxation) results in patients having symptoms of progressive dysphagia, weight loss, and regurgitation. Treatment modalities have evolved over the past few decades from balloon dilation and botulinum toxin injection to laparoscopic Heller myotomy and endoscopic myotomy. Most data on achalasia management is extrapolated to children from adult experience. This article describes understanding of the pathogenesis and discusses newer therapeutic techniques as well as controversies in management.

Results of Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Achalasia in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a rare disorder in children who are commonly treated by laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM). However, there are no large studies evaluating the results of LHM in the pediatric population, and the need of a concomitant fundoplication remains unclear. The aim of the study is to appraise the results of LHM based on a systematic literature review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE search of the English literature was performed for "achalasia," "children," "laparoscopy," "Heller," "myotomy," and "cardiomyotomy." Frequency of postoperative symptoms was grouped to calculate the percentage of patients with symptoms improvement. Incidence of postoperative gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and dysphagia between patients with and without fundoplication at the time of LHM was compared by Fisher's Exact Test. P < .05 was regarded as significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were analyzed (331 children, 1-19 years). All studies were retrospective case-series reviews. Intraoperative complications occurred in 33 patients (10%), with esophageal perforations in 31 (9%), and conversion to open procedure in 9 (2.7%). Fundoplication was performed in 271 (82%): Dor (n = 205, 76%), Toupet (n = 49, 18%), Thal (n = 13, 4.5%), and Nissen (n = 4, 1.5%). Incidence of postoperative GER and dysphagia was similar between children with and without fundoplication (P = 1). Forty-nine (15%) required re-intervention: pneumatic dilatations (n = 30, 9%), redo-surgery (n = 23, 7%), botox injection (n = 1, 0.3%), and medical therapy (n = 5, 1.5%).

DISCUSSION

LHM for achalasia is effective in 85% of children. Revision surgery is required in 7%. There is no difference in incidence of GER and dysphagia between patients with and without fundoplication. Routine use of an additional fundoplication might not be justified.

Surgical management of esophageal achalasia: Evolution of an institutional approach to minimally invasive repair

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of esophageal achalasia (EA) in children has transitioned over the past 2 decades to predominantly involve laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) or minimally invasive surgery (MIS). More recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been utilized to treat achalasia in children. Since the overall experience with surgical management of EA is contingent upon disease incidence and surgeon experience, the aim of this study is to report a single institutional contemporary experience for outcomes of surgical treatment of EA by LHM and POEM, with regards to other comparable series in children.

METHODS

An IRB approved retrospective review of all patients with EA who underwent treatment by a surgical approach at a tertiary US children's hospital from 2006 to 2015. Data including demographics, operative approach, Eckardt scores pre- and postoperatively, complications, outcomes, and follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients underwent 35 operative procedures to treat achalasia. Of these operations; 25 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with Dor fundoplication; 4 patients underwent LHM alone; 2 patients underwent LHM with Thal fundoplication; 2 patients underwent primary POEM; 2 patients who had had LHM with Dor fundoplication underwent redo LHM with takedown of Dor fundoplication. Intraoperative complications included 2 mucosal perforations (6%), 1 aspiration, 1 pneumothorax (1 POEM patient). Follow ranged from 8months to 7years (8-84months). There were no deaths and no conversions to open operations. Five patients required intervention after surgical treatment of achalasia for recurrent dysphagia including 3 who underwent between 1 and 3 pneumatic dilations; and 2 who had redo LHM with takedown of Dor fundoplication with all patients achieving complete resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal achalasia in children occurs at a much lower incidence than in adults as documented by published series describing the surgical treatment in children. We believe the MIS surgical approach remains the standard of care for this condition in children and describe the surgical outcomes and complications for LHM, as well as, the introduction of the POEM technique in our center for treating achalasia. Our institutional experience described herein represents the largest in the "MIS era" with excellent results. We will refer to alterations in our practice that have included the use of flexible endoscopy in 100% of LHM cases and use of the endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) in both LHM and POEM cases which we believe enables adequate Heller myotomy.

Heller Myotomy Is Superior to Balloon Dilatation or Botulinum Injection in Children with Achalasia: A Two-Center Review

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is an uncommon disorder in children. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for achalasia. We investigate the effectiveness of symptom relief in patients who underwent endoscopic treatments versus Heller myotomy (HM).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all children (age 0-18 years) treated for achalasia at two pediatric hospitals from 2004 to 2014. Demographics, presenting symptoms, outcomes, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (61% male) were identified with a mean age at diagnosis of 11.6 ± 5.0 years. About 47.8% of the cohort had no comorbidities. Common presenting symptoms included weight loss/failure to thrive (87.0%), emesis (69.6%), and dysphagia (69.6%). Mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 18 ± 18.9 months. Nine patients underwent laparoscopic HM as their primary treatment, whereas 14 received esophageal dilatation (ED) as their first-line therapy. Patients who underwent ED as their initial treatment were younger (9.92 versus 15.6 years, P = .047). Patients who underwent HM were more likely to attain symptom resolution compared to those managed with ED alone (P = .004). Of the 14 patients who underwent ED initially, 10 subsequently required HM due to persistent symptoms. None of the 4 patients who underwent ED alone achieved long-term symptom relief and, on the average, required an increased number of procedures compared to their HM counterparts (5.25 versus 2.47, P = .010). There was a trend toward increased intraoperative mucosal perforation in patients who underwent preoperative ED and botulinum injections.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that HM is superior to balloon dilatation or botulinum injection in children with achalasia. We conclude that HM should be recommended for newly diagnosed children with achalasia as a first-line therapy.

Early myotomy and fundoplication in achalasia in childhood: a single-centre experience for 22 years

Introduction The aim of this study was to review a single institution's experience with surgical interventions in children with achalasia and to determine treatment strategies for this rare disorder. Patients and methods This study is a retrospective analysis of 22 cases of childhood achalasia from 1991 to 2013. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, symptoms, interventions, intraoperative complications, and recurrent dysphagia. Results There were 13 boys and nine girls (7 months to 17 years old). The clinical symptoms were vomiting (68%), dysphagia (36%), wheezing (18%), coughing (13%), and weight-loss (13%). The mean duration of symptoms was 2.4 years (1 month to 6 years). A barium contrast X-ray study was performed in all of the patients. Oesophageal manometry was performed in eight patients. Six patients underwent multiple oesophageal dilatations (ED) as a first intervention. A Heller myotomy (HM) and fundoplication were performed in all the patients except two patients who recovered with dilatation. In the long term, one patient had a stricture due to the operation and had to undergo a reoperation. Of the Heller myotomy patients, one had a recurrent stricture that responded to dilatation. No other complications were present. All the patients are now asymptomatic. Conclusion Early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment is important to prevent growth impairment in childhood achalasia cases. A Heller myotomy followed by a partial anti-reflux procedure is an effective treatment for achalasia in children. Based on our experience, it is superior to oesophageal dilatation therapy.

Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in children: A review

Esophageal achalasia in children is rare but ultimately requires endoscopic or surgical treatment. Historically, Heller esophagomyotomy has been recommended as the treatment of choice. The refinement of minimally invasive techniques has shifted the trend of treatment toward laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) in adults and children with achalasia. A review of the available literature on LHM performed in patients < 18 years of age was conducted. The pediatric LHM experience is limited to one multi-institutional and several single-institutional retrospective studies. Available data suggest that LHM is safe and effective. There is a paucity of evidence on the need for and superiority of concurrent antireflux procedures. In addition, a more complete portrayal of complications and long-term (> 5 years) outcomes is needed. Due to the infrequency of achalasia in children, these characteristics are unlikely to be defined without collaboration between multiple pediatric surgery centers. The introduction of peroral endoscopic myotomy and single-incision techniques, continue the trend of innovative approaches that may eventually become the standard of care.

Treatment of esophageal achalasia in children: Today and tomorrow

BACKGROUND

Esophageal achalasia (EA) is a rare esophageal motility disorder in children. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) represents the treatment of choice in young patients. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is becoming an alternative to LHM. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of POEM vs LHM in treatment of children with EA.

METHODS

Data of pediatric patients with EA, who underwent LHM and POEM from February 2009 to December 2013 in two centers, were collected.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (9 male, mean age: 11.6 years; range: 2-17 years) were included. Nine patients (6 male, mean age: 10.7 years; range: 2-16 years) underwent LHM, and the other 9 (3 males, mean age: 12.2 years; range: 6-17 years) underwent POEM procedure. Mean operation time was shorter in POEM group compared with LHM group (62/149 minutes). Myotomy was longer in POEM group than in LHM group (11/7 cm). One major complication occurred after LHM (esophageal perforation). No clinical and manometric differences were observed between LHM and POEM in follow-up. The incidence of iatrogenic gastroesophageal reflux disease was low (1 patient in both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of a midterm follow-up show that LHM and POEM are safe and effective treatments also in children. Besides, POEM is a mini-invasive technique with an inferior execution timing compared to LHM. A skilled endoscopic team is mandatory to perform this procedure.

Paediatric laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy: a single centre series

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of oesophageal achalasia remains unclear in the paediatric population due to the rarity of the disease. This study reviews the institutional experience of the laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy (HC) procedure and attempts to define the most appropriate treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children undergoing HC at a single institution was performed. Demographics, pre-operative investigations, and interventions were reviewed. Post-operative outcomes and follow up were evaluated. Data is expressed as median (range).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight children were included (13 male, 15 female) whose median age was 13 (3.2-17.4) years. Nine children underwent a pre-operative oesophageal balloon dilatation (OBD) a median of 1(1-6) times. Others included botulinum toxin injection (n=1) and Nifedipine (n=1). All had a pre-operative upper gastrointestinal contrast series, and twenty-five had upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and manometry. All had laparoscopic HC with no conversions, and ten had a concomitant fundoplication. Post-operative intervention occurred in eight (28%) incorporating OBD (n=7), of whom four required a redo HC. One patient underwent a redo without intervening OBD. Follow-up was for a median of 0.83 (0-5) years with fourteen children discharged from surgical follow-up. Twenty-seven have thus far had a good outcome.

CONCLUSION

This study comprises the largest series of paediatric laparoscopic HC reported to date. It is effective with or without a fundoplication and is the best long term treatment modality available. OBD for persisting symptoms following HC may obviate the need for redo myotomy.

Achalasia--balloon dilation or surgery?

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapeutic schedule in patients with achalasia is still under discussion. The aim of this study was to review our institution's experience with myotomy and dilation in patients with achalasia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical data were available for 59 patients who had ever had myotomy (n=38), dilation (n=21), or both procedures (n=8) between 2000 and 2007. Patients were followed prospectively with objective (a barium esophagogram) and subjective (a simple survey that scored dysphagia and overall patient satisfaction with the procedure) diagnostic tools. In the group of patients after pneumatic dilatations, frequency of interventions was higher (1, 2) than in the myotomy group (0, 2) at 2-year follow-up. Patients after myotomy with recurrence of dysphagia were treated with dilations.

RESULTS

Mean time of dysphagia occurrence was similar in both groups (10 months). The statistically significant differences in treatment outcomes in both groups were in favor of myotomy during 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicates that both methods of treatment might be useful in dysphagia control, but better results are obtained after myotomy. Repeat interventions are more frequent after endoscopic dilation. One method of treatment does not exclude the other. A short period of symptom relief after myotomy may suggest the myotomy was incomplete.

Diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and associated diseases of achalasia in children and adolescents: a twelve-year single center experience

PURPOSE

Although achalasia is a rare disorder in children, its symptom may mimic common childhood diseases. This study aimed to assess the diagnosis and management of achalasia in children and adolescents in a Brazilian single center during a 12-year period.

METHODS

Patients with achalasia were identified from a database built during the period of January 2000-January 2012 from a Pediatric Gastroenterology reference center. Information regarding demographic data, clinical symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term follow-up were described.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were studied; median age was 7 (1-14) years. Most frequent symptoms were vomiting (84.6 %) and dysphagia (69.2 %). Weight loss occurred in 46.0 % of patients and chronic cough in 46.1 %. Associated disorders were Down's syndrome, Allgrove syndrome, and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. Achalasia was misdiagnosed with anorexia nervosa. Six patients were previously treated as having gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma. Five patients had pneumatic balloon dilation as initial therapy whereas five had esophageal myotomy. Finally, 11 patients had surgical therapy with a favorable follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Achalasia symptoms may mimic common diseases in children, and therefore, may delay the diagnosis. This study emphasizes the importance of the clinical symptoms for the diagnosis of achalasia, mainly in those cases with associated disorders.

Pneumatic balloon dilation in pediatric achalasia: efficacy and factors predicting outcome at a single tertiary pediatric gastroenterology center

BACKGROUND

The use of pneumatic dilation (PD) is well established in adults with achalasia; however, it is less commonly used in children.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of PD in pediatric achalasia and to define predictive factors for its treatment failure.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four patients with achalasia were enrolled from January 2004 to November 2009 and were followed for a median of 6 years.

INTERVENTION

PD was performed with the patients under general anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Efficacy and safety of PD. Follow-up was performed by using the Eckardt score, barium swallow contrast studies, and esophageal manometry at baseline; 1, 3, and 6 months after dilation; and every year thereafter. A Cox regression model was used to identify independent predictors of failure after the first PD.

RESULTS

The PD success rate was 67%. In 8 patients, the first PD failed, but the parents of one patient refused a second PD and requested surgery. Of the 7 patients who underwent repeated treatment, the second PD failed in 3 (43%). Overall, only 3 of the 24 patients underwent surgery (overall success rate after a maximum of 3 PDs was 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that only older age was independently associated with a higher probability of the procedure success (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

PD is a safe and effective technique in the management of pediatric achalasia. Young age is an independent negative predictive factor for successful clinical outcome.

Fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation of benign esophageal strictures: incidence of esophageal rupture and its management in 589 patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to investigate the incidence and management of esophageal rupture caused by balloon dilation in patients with benign esophageal strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fluoroscopically guided esophageal balloon dilation was performed on 589 patients with benign esophageal strictures during an 18-year period. The strictures had a range of causes: postoperative anastomotic stricture, corrosive stricture, postradiation stricture, esophageal achalasia, esophageal reflux, congenital stricture, esophageal web, esophageal ulcer, medication fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and posttraumatic stricture (in descending order of frequency). Esophageal rupture was assigned to one of three categories: type 1 was intramural, type 2 was transmural with a contained leak, and type 3 was transmural with an uncontained mediastinal leakage.

RESULTS

A total of 1421 procedures were performed in 589 patients, with each patient undergoing 1-29 procedures. The technical success rate was 99.8%, and the clinical success rate was 91.7%. Patients with corrosive stricture underwent the highest number of procedures (mean, 4.38 procedures). The incidence of esophageal rupture was 14.7%. All esophageal ruptures were detected immediately after the procedure. Most ruptures (98.6%) were types 1 and 2 and were successfully managed conservatively. Only 1.4% of the ruptures were type 3 and required active management. One of the type 3 ruptures was successfully treated with a retrievable covered stent. Two patients with type 3 ruptures (0.96% of ruptures) underwent surgery and were successfully treated. The rupture rate was not statistically related to the diameter of balloon used.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of esophageal rupture after fluoroscopically guided esophageal balloon dilation was 14.7%. Almost all ruptures were type 1 or 2 and were successfully managed conservatively. Only 1.4% of the ruptures were type 3 and required active management. There was no procedure-related mortality in any patient. Therefore, in spite of the high incidence of ruptures, fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation is a safe procedure, particularly if a rupture is identified early and managed appropriately.

Surgical treatment for achalasia: when should it be performed, and for which patients?

Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the esophagus, characterized by the absence of peristalsis and impaired swallow-induced relaxation. In the past decade, evidence has been accumulated suggesting that achalasia may be an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has slowly shifted the treatment of achalasia toward the greater use of surgical therapy. The goal of both surgical and nonsurgical treatment is to eliminate the outflow obstruction afforded by a nonrelaxing sphincter, relieving dysphagia and maintaining a barrier against gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Endoscopic botulinum toxin injection (EBTI) is safe, easy to perform, inexpensive, and effective in aged patients, and it is especially effective when the lower esophageal pressure is hypertonic. This therapeutic option is reserved for patients too ill to undergo any surgical procedure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) has been shown to be an effective and inexpensive treatment with few adverse effects. The long-term success rate of PD seems to drop progressively over time. Heller myotomy (HM) has shown the best clinical efficacy in achalasia as a first-line treatment. Multiple endoscopic treatments are associated with poorer outcomes after HM. EBTI also makes LHM more difficult and results in a worse surgical outcome. The inferior symptomatic outcomes after thoracoscopic HM may be caused by the difficulty in extending an adequate myotomy onto the stomach from the chest and the inability to create a fundoplication. LHM with Dor's fundoplication (LHM + Dor) is effective and is safer procedure for avoiding GER, dysphagia, mucosal perforation, and a pseudodiverticulum. LHM + Dor is also effective in the presence of sigmoid achalasia, but the clinical result is not as good as nonsigmoid achalasia. A few patients need esophagectomy for surgical failure of HM. However, considering the risk of esophagectomy, LHM + Dor is the first treatment option for patients with achalasia regardless of the degree of esophageal dilatation. This procedure is therefore considered to be an effective and safe treatment for patients of any age or with any condition.

Outcomes of treatment of childhood achalasia

PURPOSE

The optimal management of achalasia in children and adolescents remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review a single institution's experience with endoscopic and surgical interventions in children with achalasia.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of children treated for achalasia from 1978 to 2008. Patient demographics and interventions were reviewed. Outcomes after procedural intervention were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with achalasia were identified, and data were available for 34 (age, 13 +/- 6 years; male, 62%). Eighteen patients underwent esophageal dilation (ED), and 16 patients underwent Heller myotomy (HM). Follow-up was available for 30 patients (ED, 15; HM, 15). There was symptom recurrence in 15 of 15 ED cases and 8 (53%) of 15 HM cases (P < .01). Additional interventions were performed in 14 (93%) of 15 ED cases and 6 (40%) of 15 HM cases (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Heller myotomy may provide more durable long-term outcomes, as defined by symptom recurrence and need for subsequent intervention, and may be considered the procedure of choice.

Treatments for pediatric achalasia: Heller myotomy or pneumatic dilatation?

AIM

The treatment of achalasia consists of reducing distal esophageal obstruction by either Heller myotomy surgery or endoscopic pneumatic dilatation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the short- and middle-term results of these procedures in children.

METHODOLOGY

For technical reasons, children under six years old (n=8) were treated by surgery only, whereas patients over six years old (n=14) were treated by either Heller myotomy or pneumatic dilatation.

RESULTS

Of the children aged under six years, 75% were symptom-free at six months and 83% at 24 months of follow-up. Of the patients aged over six years, complete remission was achieved by Heller myotomy in 44.5% vs. 55.5% by pneumatic dilatation after six months, and in 40% vs. 65%, respectively, after 24 months. Both pneumatic dilatation and Heller myotomy showed significant rates of failure.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pneumatic dilatation may be considered a primary treatment in children over six years old. Also, where necessary, Heller myotomy and pneumatic dilatation may be used as complementary treatments.