Response-based therapy for ruptured appendicitis reduces resource utilization

Standardization of Antibiotic Management and Reduction of Opioid Prescribing in Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis: A Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures in the United States. However, wide variation remains in antibiotic prescribing and pain management across and within institutions. We aimed to minimize variation in antibiotic usage and decrease opioid prescribing at discharge for children with complicated appendicitis by implementation of a quality improvement (QI) initiative.

METHODS

On December 1st, 2021, a QI initiative standardizing postoperative care for complicated appendicitis was implemented across a tertiary pediatric healthcare system with two main surgical centers. QI initiative focused on antibiotic and pain management. An extensive literature search was performed and a total of 20 articles matching our patient population were critically appraised to determine the best evidence-based interventions to implement. Antibiotic regimen included: IV or PO ceftriaxone/metronidazole immediately post-operatively and transition to PO amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for completion of 7-day total course at discharge. Discharge pain control regimen included acetaminophen, ibuprofen, as needed gabapentin, and no opioid prescription. Guideline compliance were closely monitored for the first six months following implementation.

RESULTS

In the first 6-months post-implementation, compliance with use of ceftriaxone/metronidazole as initial post-operative antibiotics was 75.6 %. Transition to PO amoxicillin-clavulanic acid prior to discharge increased from 13.7 % pre-implementation to 73.7 % 6-months post-implementation (p < 0.001). Compliance with a 7-day course of antibiotics within the first 6-months post-implementation was 60 % across both sites. After QI intervention, overall opioid prescribing remained at 0 % at one surgical site and decreased from 17.6 % to 0 % at the second surgical site over the study timeframe (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic use can be standardized and opioid prescribing minimized in children with complicated appendicitis using QI principles. Continued monitoring of the complicated appendicitis guideline is needed to assess for further progress in the standardization of post-operative care.

STUDY TYPE

Quality improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

2 days versus 5 days of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis: a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis is unclear. The increasing global threat of antimicrobial resistance warrants restrictive antibiotic use, which could also reduce side-effects, length of hospital stay, and costs.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, open-label, non-inferiority trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, patients with complex appendicitis (aged ≥8 years) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 days or 5 days of intravenous antibiotics after appendicectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre, and treating physicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days. The main outcome was the absolute risk difference (95% CI) in the primary endpoint, adjusted for age and severity of appendicitis, with a non-inferiority margin of 7·5%. Outcome assessment was based on electronic patient records and a telephone consultation 90 days after appendicectomy. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Safety outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NL5946.

FINDINGS

Between April 12, 2017, and June 3, 2021, 13 267 patients were screened and 1066 were randomly assigned, 533 to each group. 31 were excluded from intention-to-treat analysis of the 2-day group and 30 from the 5-day group owing to errors in recruitment or consent. Appendicectomy was done laparoscopically in 955 (95%) of 1005 patients. The telephone follow-up was completed in 664 (66%) of 1005 patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 (10%) of 502 patients analysed in the 2-day group and 41 (8%) of 503 patients analysed in the 5-day group (adjusted absolute risk difference 2·0%, 95% CI -1·6 to 5·6). Rates of complications and re-interventions were similar between trial groups. Fewer patients had adverse effects of antibiotics in the 2-day group (45 [9%] of 502 patients) than in the 5-day group (112 [22%] of 503 patients; odds ratio [OR] 0·344, 95% CI 0·237 to 0·498). Re-admission to hospital was more frequent in the 2-day group (58 [12%] of 502 patients) than in the 5-day group (29 [6%] of 503 patients; OR 2·135, 1·342 to 3·396). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

2 days of postoperative intravenous antibiotics for complex appendicitis is non-inferior to 5 days in terms of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days, based on a non-inferiority margin of 7·5%. These findings apply to laparoscopic appendicectomy conducted in a well resourced health-care setting. Adopting this strategy will reduce adverse effects of antibiotics and length of hospital stay.

FUNDING

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the management of complicated appendicitis in children: Results from a multicenter pediatric NSQIP analysis

BACKGROUND

Narrow-spectrum antibiotics have been found to be equivalent to anti-Pseudomonal agents in preventing organ space infections (OSI) in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. Comparative effectiveness data for children with complicated appendicitis remains limited. This investigation aimed to compare outcomes between the most common narrow-spectrum regimen (ceftriaxone with metronidazole: CM) and anti-Pseudomonal regimen (piperacillin/tazobactam: PT) used perioperatively in children with complicated appendicitis.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort study using clinical data from the NSQIP-Pediatric Appendectomy Collaborative database merged with antibiotic utilization data from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Mixed-effects multivariate regression was used to compare NSQIP-defined outcomes and resource utilization between treatment groups after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, and clustering of outcomes within hospitals.

RESULTS

654 patients from 14 hospitals were included, of which 37.9% received CM and 62.1% received PT. Following adjustment, patients in both groups had similar rates of OSI (CM: 13.3% vs. PT: 18.0%, OR 0.88 [95%CI 0.38, 2.03]), drainage procedures (CM: 8.9% vs. PT: 14.9%, OR 0.76 [95%CI 0.30, 1.92]), and postoperative imaging (CM: 19.8% vs. PT: 22.5%, OR 1.17 [95%CI 0.65, 2.12]). Treatment groups also had similar rates of 30-day cumulative post-operative length of stay (CM: 6.1 vs. PT: 6.0 days, RR 1.01 [95%CI 0.81, 1.25]) and hospital cost (CM: $19,235 vs. PT: $20,552, RR 0.92 [95%CI 0.69, 1.23]).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of organ space infection and resource utilization were similar in children with complicated appendicitis treated with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole and piperacillin/tazobactam.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Treatment study - Retrospective comparative study.

Antimicrobial Stewardship and the Infection Control Practitioner: A Natural Alliance

Antibiotic overuse and misuse has contributed to rising rates of multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridioides difficile. Decreasing antibiotic misuse has become a national public health priority. This review outlines the goals of antimicrobial stewardship, essential members of the program, implementation strategies, approaches to measuring the program's impact, and steps needed to build a program. Highlighted is the alliance between antimicrobial stewardship programs and infection prevention programs in their efforts to improve antibiotic use, improve diagnostic stewardship for C difficile and asymptomatic bacteriuria, and decrease health care-associated infections and the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Implementing PDSA Methodology for Pediatric Appendicitis Increases Care Value for a Tertiary Children's Hospital

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction:

We used the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) framework to develop and implement an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) within an urban, tertiary children’s referral center.

Methods:

We developed an evidence-based CPG for appendicitis using iterative PDSA cycles. Similar CPGs from other centers were reviewed and modified for local implementation. Adjuncts included guideline-specific order sets and operative notes in the electronic medical record system. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, hospital costs, and patient and family experience (PFE) scores. Our team tracked outcome, process, and balancing measures using Statistical Process Charts. Outcome measures were compared over 2 fiscal quarters preimplementation and 3 fiscal quarters postimplementation, using interrupted time series, student t test, and chi-square tests when appropriate.

Results:

LOS for simple (uncomplicated) appendicitis decreased to 0.87 days (interquartile range [IQR] 0.87–0.94 days) from 1.1 days (IQR 0.97–1.42 days). LOS for complicated appendicitis decreased to 4.96 days (IQR 4.95–6.15) from 5.58 days (IQR 5.16–6.09). This reduction equated to an average cost-savings of $1,122/patient. Thirty-day readmission rates have remained unchanged. PFE scores increased across all categories and have remained higher than national benchmarks.

Conclusion:

Development and Implementation of a CPG for pediatric appendicitis using the PDSA framework adds value to care provided within a large tertiary center.

Improving quality and efficiency of care for advanced appendicitis in children

BACKGROUND

Complicated appendicitis encompasses a spectrum of severity with heterogeneity in definition and substantial variation in care. Enhanced recovery after surgery or 'fast-track' protocols aim to reduce practice variation by standardizing care. These initiatives may improve quality and efficiency of care, preserve resources and expedite discharge. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a standardized Enhanced Recovery Pathway (ERP) on the post-operative recovery of children with a subset of complicated appendicitis termed 'advanced' appendicitis.

METHODS

We defined advanced appendicitis as gangrenous or suppurative appendicitis without perforation, contained iatrogenic perforation, or localized purulent fluid. Children with operative findings reflecting these criteria were enrolled in the ERP protocol. Key protocol components include early upgrade of diet, avoidance of intravenous analgesia, abridged intravenous antibiotics, early ambulation and standardized discharge criteria. The study period was May 2018 to June 2019. A historical cohort was used as the comparator group.

RESULTS

Outcomes for 44 children treated under the ERP were compared to 44 historical controls. There was a 20% reduction in median post-operative length of stay (1.80 vs. 2.24 days, p = 0.02). Intravenous analgesia was received by fewer patients (6.8% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.01) with significant reduction in antiemetic requirement (p = 0.03). No significant difference in 30-day complication rates was observed.

CONCLUSION

Reduced post-operative length of stay and reduction in practice variation were achieved after implementation of a 'fast-track' protocol for children with advanced appendicitis. Additional benefits of this protocol include reduced provision of intravenous morphine analgesia, decreased resource use and cost savings.

Distilling the Key Elements of Pediatric Appendicitis Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been shown to reduce care delays, optimize resource utilization, and improve patient outcomes. We conducted a systematized review to identify key elements that should be included in an evidence-based CPG for pediatric appendicitis.

METHODS

We characterized key decision points and content areas from CPGs developed from 2000 to 2019 that were identified using publicly available platforms and manual search/personal communications.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven CPGs were reviewed with content saturation achieved after reviewing eight. We found 16 key elements spanning from triage to postoperative care. Elements with high accord among CPGs included use of laparoscopy and delay of postoperative imaging for abscess screening until postoperative day seven. For simple appendicitis, all CPGs endorsed antibiotic cessation, diet advancement, and early activity, and 11 CPGs included same-day discharge. Elements with heterogeneity in decision-making included antibiotic selection/duration for perforated appendicitis, criteria defining perforation, and utility of postoperative laboratory evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of an evidence-based CPGs for pediatric appendicitis requires attention to a finite number of key decision points and content areas. Existing literature demonstrates improved patient outcomes with CPG implementation.

Implementation of an evidence-based protocol after appendectomy reduces unnecessary antibiotics

BACKGROUND

Children with acute appendicitis have historically received intravenous antibiotics before and after appendectomy, yet recent literature supports minimizing postoperative antibiotics. In this study, we examined the impact of a standardized protocol that eliminates postoperative antibiotics for nonperforated appendicitis and discontinues antibiotics at discharge for perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis between May 2013 and March 2017 was performed. Preprotocol patients (5/1/2013-3/31/2015) were compared to postprotocol patients (5/1/2015-3/31/2017), excluding those who underwent surgery during the month of protocol introduction (4/2015). Primary outcomes were postoperative antibiotic doses for nonperforated cases and antibiotics after discharge for perforated cases. Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests were performed.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 748 children before (PRE) and in 814 children after (POST) protocol implementation. Perforation rates were similar (POST 21.5 vs. PRE 21.8%, p=0.90). For nonperforated appendicitis, postoperative antibiotics were reduced (median 0 [IQR 0-0] vs. 3 [0-5] doses, p<0.001), and more patients were discharged less than 24 h after surgery (65.7 vs. 40.9%, p<0.001). Fewer patients with perforated appendicitis underwent PICC placement (8.6 vs. 21.0%, p=0.002), and fewer patients were prescribed antibiotics on discharge (33.7 vs. 89.0%, p<0.001). There were no differences between groups for complication, readmission, or return to ED rates.

CONCLUSION

For children with acute appendicitis, a standardized protocol can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotics and decrease length of stay. Furthermore, the judicious use of antibiotics does not increase SSI, readmission, or overall complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Variation in Classification and Postoperative Management of Complex Appendicitis: A European Survey

Background

Data on common practice in the management of patients with complex appendicitis are scarce, especially for the adult population. Variation in the definition of complex appendicitis, indications for and the type of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis have not been well studied yet. The aim of this study was to document current practice of the classification and postoperative management of complex appendicitis on an international level.

Methods

An online survey was dispersed among practicing surgeons and surgical residents. Survey questions pertained to the definition of a complex appendicitis, indications for antibiotic prophylaxis after appendectomy, the duration, route of administration and antibiotic agents used.

Results

A total of 137 survey responses were eligible for analysis. Most respondents were from Northern or Western Europe and were specialized in gastrointestinal surgery. Opinion varied substantially regarding the management of appendicitis, in particular for phlegmonous appendicitis with localized pus, gangrenous appendicitis and iatrogenic rupture of appendicitis. The most common duration of postoperative antibiotics was evenly spread over <3, 3, 5 and 7 days. Whereas most respondents indicated a combined intravenous and oral route of administration was common practice, 28% answered a completely intravenous route of administration was standard practice.

Conclusion

Current practice patterns in the classification and postoperative management of complex appendicitis are highly variable.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4806-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prospective evaluation of a clinical response directed pathway for complicated appendicitis

AIM

Despite evidence to suggest shorter durations of antibiotics are safe in complicated appendicitis, the practice has not been widely adopted in the UK. Our aim was to determine whether a clinical pathway that tailors antibiotics to clinical condition was safe and effective.

METHODS

A new post-operative pathway (NewPath) was devised that reduced mandatory intravenous antibiotics for complicated appendicitis (perforated or gangrenous) from 5 to 3 days post-operatively, provided the child was apyrexial for >12 h and tolerating oral diet. Oral antibiotics were only given if white-blood-cell counts were raised. Data were collected prospectively (NewPath) and compared to 100 cases immediately prior. Data are presented as median [IQR]. Comparisons used the Fisher's exact or Mann Whitney U tests as appropriate. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four children completed the NewPath over 11 months. Age and normal appendicectomy rate were similar [NewPath vs. control, 9y (6-12) vs. 10y (7-13) and 19/164 (12%) vs.15/100 (15%)]. Complicated appendicitis rates were 88/164 [54%] vs. 42/100 [42%]; p = 0.08. Length of stay was shorter for the NewPath [5 (4-7) vs. 7 (6-8) days; p = 0.009], and fewer required oral antibiotics [35/88 (40%) vs. 26/42 (62%); p = 0.01]. Readmissions within 28 days [24/88 (27%) vs. 8/42 (19%), p = 0.39) and intra-abdominal collections [20/88 (23%) vs. 6/42 (14%), p = 0.35] were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative appendicitis care guided by clinical progress and white-blood-cell count can reduce hospital stay and antibiotic use without increasing complications. Pathways such as this could save considerable health resource and contribute to important antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Utility of standardized discharge criteria after appendectomy to identify pediatric patients requiring intervention after postoperative imaging

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of failure-of-discharge criteria and identify the cohort of pediatric patients after appendectomy in whom postoperative imaging would impact management.

METHODS

Pediatric patients who underwent an appendectomy from July 2009 to May 2017 were included. Complicated appendicitis was defined based on the intraoperative diagnosis. Postoperative imaging was recommended at postoperative days 5-7 for patients who met at least one criterion of failure of standard management: fever (>38°C), leukocytosis (white blood cell count >12,000/mm³), diet intolerance, or uncontrolled pain by oral analgesics at postoperative day 5. Primary outcomes included any intervention (reoperation, drainage procedures, or change in antibiotics).

RESULTS

In all, 3,276 pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy were identified. Of these patients, 12% met at least 1 discharge criterion of failure Most discharge failures (79%) underwent postoperative imaging, such as computed tomography (68%), ultrasonography then computed tomography (20%), or ultrasonography only (12%); 39% of imaging patients required intervention. On multiple logistic regression, 3 criteria (diet intolerance, fever, and leukocytosis), complicated disease, and age were associated with the need for intervention after imaging. The type of imaging modality did not discriminate need for intervention.

CONCLUSION

Standardized criteria identifying failure of ability to discharge the patient after appendectomy limits the need for unnecessary imaging. In the management of pediatric appendicitis, a selective approach resulted in a high yield of complications requiring intervention after obtaining postoperative imaging.

Disease-based antimicrobial stewardship: a review of active and passive approaches to patient management

Although new antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) often begin by targeting the reduction of antimicrobial use, an increasing focus of ASPs is to improve the management of specific infectious diseases. Disease-based antimicrobial stewardship emphasizes improving patient outcomes by optimizing antimicrobial use and increasing compliance with performance measures. Directing efforts towards the comprehensive management of specific infections allows ASPs to promote the shift in healthcare towards improving quality, safety and patient outcome metrics for specific diseases. This review evaluates published active and passive disease-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions and their impact on antimicrobial use and associated patient outcomes for patients with pneumonia, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, asymptomatic bacteriuria, Clostridium difficile infection and intra-abdominal infections. Current literature suggests that disease-based antimicrobial stewardship effects on medical management and patient outcomes vary based on infectious disease syndrome, resource availability and intervention type.

Improving the value of care for appendectomy through an individual surgeon-specific approach

PURPOSE

Standardized care via a unified surgeon preference card for pediatric appendectomy can result in significant cost reduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of cost and outcome feedback to surgeons on value of care in an environment reluctant to adopt a standardized surgeon preference card.

METHODS

Prospective observational study comparing operating room (OR) supply costs and patient outcomes for appendectomy in children with 6-month observation periods both before and after intervention. The intervention was real-time feedback of OR supply cost data to individual surgeons via automated dashboards and monthly reports.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixteen children underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis (110 pre-intervention and 106 post-intervention). Median supply cost significantly decreased after intervention: $884 (IQR $705-$1025) to $388 (IQR $182-$776), p<0.001. No significant change was detected in median OR duration (47min [IQR 36-63] to 50min [IQR 38-64], p=0.520) or adverse events (1 [0.9%] to 6 [4.7%], p=0.062). OR supply costs for individual surgeons significantly decreased during the intervention period for 6 of 8 surgeons (87.5%).

CONCLUSION

Approaching value measurement with a surgeon-specific (rather than group-wide) approach can reduce OR supply costs while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Two versus five days of antibiotics after appendectomy for complex acute appendicitis (APPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common indications for emergency surgery. In patients with a complex appendicitis, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended after appendectomy. There is no consensus regarding the optimum duration of antibiotics. Guidelines propose 3 to 7 days of treatment, but shorter courses may be as effective in the prevention of infectious complications. At the same time, the global issue of increasing antimicrobial resistance urges for optimization of antibiotic strategies. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short course (48 h) of postoperative antibiotics is non-inferior to current standard practice of 5 days.

Methods

Patients of 8 years and older undergoing appendectomy for acute complex appendicitis – defined as a gangrenous and/or perforated appendicitis or appendicitis in presence of an abscess – are eligible for inclusion. Immunocompromised or pregnant patients are excluded, as well as patients with a contraindication to the study antibiotics. In total, 1066 patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental treatment arm (48 h of postoperative intravenously administered (IV) antibiotics) or the control arm (5 days of postoperative IV antibiotics). After discharge from the hospital, patients participate in a productivity-cost-questionnaire at 4 weeks and a standardized telephone follow-up at 90 days after appendectomy. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of infectious complications, including intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and surgical site infection (SSI), and mortality within 90 days after appendectomy. Secondary outcomes include IAA, SSI, restart of antibiotics, length of hospital stay (LOS), reoperation, percutaneous drainage, readmission rate, and cost-effectiveness. The non-inferiority margin for the difference in the primary endpoint rate is set at 7.5% (one-sided test at ɑ 0.025). Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses will be performed.

Discussion

This trial will provide evidence on whether 48 h of postoperative antibiotics is non-inferior to a standard course of 5 days of antibiotics. If non-inferiority is established, longer intravenous administration following appendectomy for complex appendicitis can be abandoned, and guidelines need to be adjusted accordingly.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register, NTR6128. Registered on 20 December 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2629-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Measuring the Value of a Clinical Practice Guideline for Children With Perforated Appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of a clinical practice guideline (CPG) compared with "usual care" for treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. Secondary objective was to compare cost analyses using hospital accounting system data versus data in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS).

BACKGROUND

Value-based surgical care (outcomes relative to costs) is frequently touted, but outcomes and costs are rarely measured together.

METHODS

During an 18-month period, 122 children with perforated appendicitis at a tertiary referral children's hospital were treated using an evidence-based CPG. Clinical outcomes and costs for the CPG cohort were compared with patients in the 30-month period before CPG implementation (n = 191 children).

RESULTS

With CPG-directed care, intra-abdominal abscess rate decreased from 0.24 to 0.10 (adjusted risk ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.75). The rate of any adverse event decreased from 0.30 to 0.23 (adjusted risk ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.58-1.17). Mean total hospital costs per patient (hospital accounting system) decreased from $16,466 to $10,528 (adjusted absolute difference-$5451, 95% CI -$7755 to -$3147), leading to estimated adjusted total savings of $665,022 during the study period. Costs obtained from the PHIS database also showed reduction with CPG-directed care (-$6669, 95% CI -$8949 to -$4389 per patient). In Bayesian cost-effectiveness analyses, likelihood that CPG was the dominant strategy was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

An evidence-based CPG increased the value of surgical care for children with perforated appendicitis by improving outcomes and lowering costs. Hospital cost accounting data and pre-existing cost data within the PHIS database provided similar results.

Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review

Appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain in children. The diagnosis and treatment of the disease have undergone major changes in the past two decades, primarily as a result of the application of an evidence-based approach. Data from several randomized controlled trials, large database studies, and meta-analyses have fundamentally affected patient care. The best diagnostic approach is a standardized clinical pathway with a scoring system and selective imaging. Non-operative management of simple appendicitis is a reasonable option in selected cases, with the caveat that data in children remain limited. A minimally invasive (laparoscopic) appendectomy is the current standard in US and European children's hospitals. This article reviews the current 'state of the art' in the evaluation and management of pediatric appendicitis.

The contribution of practice variation to length of stay for children with perforated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative length of stay (pLOS) is an easily tracked outcome that reflects health care efficiency and resource utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of practice variation on pLOS for children with perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

Children ages 2-18years with appendectomy for complicated appendicitis were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric. Extended pLOS (EpLOS) was defined as ≥7days (75th percentile). The contribution of comorbidities, operative traits, and postoperative complications to EpLOS was evaluated using regression models and matched subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Of 2585 children with complicated appendicitis in our study, 835 had EpLOS. Regression analysis found that EpLOS was associated with extended operative time (odds ratio (OR) 1.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-2.44), dehiscence (OR 13.19; 95% CI 1.52-114.23), wound infection (OR 7.39; 95% CI 2.63-20.80), organ space infection (OR 92.51; 95% CI 34.03-251.50), and pneumonia (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.06-19.44). Over three-fourths of the variation in pLOS could not be explained by preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative factors.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variation in pLOS for children undergoing appendectomy that is not accounted for by comorbidities, operative traits, or complications indicating an opportunity to improve outcomes through modifying practice patterns.

Pediatric appendicitis and need for antibiotics at time of discharge: Does route of administration matter?

INTRODUCTION

Following complicated appendicitis, there are limited data available to guide the surgeon regarding antibiotic selection, specifically in regards to route of administration. We hypothesized that among children with appendicitis who are discharged home with antibiotic therapy, the post-discharge readmission and complication rates do not differ between those children who receive IV antibiotics and those who receive PO antibiotics.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all children discharged home on antibiotics following appendectomy at a single institution between 11/10-10/14. We compared outcomes including ED and hospital readmission rates, and development of postoperative complications, between those children who were discharged on IV antibiotics and those discharged on PO antibiotics.

RESULTS

325 children were discharged with antibiotics following appendectomy (n=291 PO antibiotics group; n=34 IV group). On both univariate and multivariate analysis, rate of each complication did not differ between the two groups including inpatient readmission (5% PO vs. 6% IV; p=0.8), ED readmission (10% vs. 11%; p=0.8), postdischarge complications related to the operation (10% vs. 15%; p=0.4), or abscess development post-discharge (4% vs. 3%; p=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with complicated appendicitis who are discharged home with ongoing antibiotic therapy, our data demonstrate no differences in outcomes between those children who receive IV and PO antibiotics. Further data, collected in a prospective fashion, are needed to clarify the role of IV and PO antibiotics among children with perforated appendicitis.