Preparing enhanced recovery after surgery for implementation in pediatric populations

Five Lessons in Feeding Following Abdominal Surgery in Children: Can We Discontinue Unnecessary Fasting?

Fasting children after gastrointestinal surgery is traditionally thought to reduce complications. However, over the last two decades, there has been increasing interest in feed commencement within 24 h of operation, termed 'early enteral nutrition'. Evidence is now demonstrating that this approach to feeding aligns more closely with value-based healthcare principles than traditional postoperative fasting. This is reflected in the fact that early feeding can be safely offered and is associated with earlier return of bowel function, with shorter time to stool, quicker progression to full feeds and reduced length of stay. There is higher patient satisfaction, and no increase in complications. Because of this, early enteral nutrition is a key component of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, which are being integrated into paediatric surgical practice.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Pediatric Single Lobe Thyroidectomy

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERP) have gained popularity for optimizing perioperative care, improving patient outcomes, and reducing hospital stays. While extensively studied in adult populations, ERPs in pediatric patients, especially for thyroid surgeries, are uncommon. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing an ERP designed for pediatric patients undergoing single-lobe thyroidectomy.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at Nationwide Children's Hospital from January 2023 to December 2024 and involved children 8 years of age or older undergoing single lobe thyroidectomy. Patients with significant comorbid conditions or undergoing total thyroidectomy were excluded. The ERP incorporated standardized preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. Outcome measures were postoperative pain, incidence of postoperative nausea, time to discharge, and patient/parent satisfaction. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

16 patients were included, predominantly female (81.3 %, n = 13), ranging in age from 8 to 17 years. The median surgical time was 63 min (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 56.5, 75). Following surgery, patients spent a median of 60 min (IQR: 43, 63.5) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and 217 min (IQR: 189, 260) in the transitional care unit (TCU) before discharge. Adherence to the ERP was high, with 100 % compliance to the order set. 81 % of patients experienced no nausea or vomiting in the PACU/TCU. A single patient required an extended stay due to postoperative nausea, for same-day discharge success rate of 93.8 %. Post-discharge, 93.8 % of patients reported no nausea, and pain was effectively managed without opioid use in 68.8 % of patients. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No patients required readmission, and all reported high satisfaction with the care received on post-operative satisfaction survey (mean score = 5/5).

DISCUSSION

Implementation of a pediatric ERP for single-lobe thyroidectomy was successful in promoting same-day discharge, effective pain control without opioids, healthcare utilization management, high patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that ERPs can be safely and effectively adapted for select pediatric thyroid surgery, potentially setting a new standard for perioperative care in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Decreasing Opioid Usage in Pediatric Cholecystectomy Through Care Standardization: A Quality Improvement Project Using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols

BACKGROUND

While enhanced recovery after surgery protocols have been successful in adults, their impact in pediatric surgery is less documented.

SMART AIM

Reduce opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents by 25% over 32 months through an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. This period included 5 months dedicated to testing and implementing the protocol, followed by 27 months of full implementation. Process measures ensured adherence, with 30-day readmission rates, pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and hospital length of stay as balancing measures.

METHODS

Inconsistent perioperative management led to variable opioid use in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients at our hospital. A quality improvement project using the Model for Improvement was implemented at a 443-bed pediatric academic hospital. A multidisciplinary enhanced recovery after surgery team implemented perioperative standardizations supported by electronic medical record best practice advisories, monthly educational sessions, and stakeholder engagement.

RESULTS

After full enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation, morphine milligram equivalents decreased by 27% over 32 months. Mean pain scores decreased from 4.69 (95% CI: 4.32-5.06) pre-enhanced recovery after surgery to 4.10 (95% CI: 3.84-4.36) post-enhanced recovery after surgery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence decreased from 18% (95% CI: 11.7-26.7) to 15% (95% CI: 9.3-23.3), and pruritus incidence declined from 6% (95% CI: 2.8-12.5) to 5% (95% CI: 2.2-11.2). Mean hospital length of stay was 1.37 days (95% CI: 1.33-1.41) pre-enhanced recovery after surgery and 1.34 days (95% CI: 1.30-1.38) post-enhanced recovery after surgery. The 30-day readmission rate remained unchanged, with the sole readmission attributed to constipation.

CONCLUSION

Standardizing care through enhanced recovery after surgery protocols effectively reduces opioid use in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy without increasing mean postoperative pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, or hospital length of stay.

Error Traps in Developing a Pediatric Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve patient outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and decrease costs. First created and implemented in the adult population, these pathways are now commonplace and continue to expand in the pediatric realm. While there are many proven benefits to ERAS pathways, there continue to be challenges to their proper implementation and long-term success. This article aims to explore common challenges in pediatric ERAS development and implementation, along with strategies to avoid potential pitfalls. Key themes include departmental and institutional support, stakeholder engagement, awareness of pathways, data management and dissemination, and long-term maintenance including Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Pathway development teams should be aware of these considerations and potential pitfalls, and focusing on them can promote long-term success for a well-designed pathway.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Pediatric Abdominal Tumor Resections: A Prospective Multi-institution Study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multi-disciplinary approaches to standardize perioperative care. This is the first prospective, multi-institutional study to evaluate ERAS in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal tumor resections.

METHODS

All patients >1-month-old undergoing abdominal tumor resection at one of three children's hospitals between 2020 and 2022 were eligible. ERAS counseling was performed, and informed consent obtained. The ERAS protocol was standardized across institutions. We compared the prospective cohort to a propensity-matched historical cohort (2014-2020) from each institution utilizing 16 variables. Categorical variables were compared using McNemar's and/or Stuart-Maxwell testing. Continuous data was compared using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients enrolled in the prospective cohort and were compared to 95 well-matched historic patients. Median LOS was 5.3 (4.1-7.2) days in the historic cohort, and 4.3 (3.3-6.2) days in the ERAS cohort (p = 0.053). Post-operative opioid consumption was lower in ERAS patients at 0.08 (0.03-0.16) MME mg/kg/day versus 0.23 (0.12-0.52) in historic patients (p = 0.013). ERAS patients received clear (POD#0, 0-0) and regular (POD#1, 1.0-1.0) diets two days sooner (both p < 0.001). ERAS patients ambulated two days sooner (1.0, 1.0-2.0 versus 3.0, 2.0-5.0). The number of patients who experienced any complication was significantly lower in the ERAS cohort (44, 44.2 %) compared to historic (82, 86.3 %, p < 0.001). This reduction was seen across each Clavien-Dindo grade 1-3 category (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocols are feasible in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal tumor resections. Use of an ERAS protocol significantly reduced complications, opioid consumption, time to mobility, and time to diets.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Pain management after pediatric minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Pectus excavatum is a common congenital chest wall abnormality characterized by a concave appearance of the chest, and minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) is the surgical treatment of choice. A rapidly growing field of research is pain management in children undergoing MIRPE, with many shifts in practice occurring over the last decade. The primary objectives of this narrative review are to describe current methods of perioperative pain management and the development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) to improve the experience of patients undergoing MIRPE.

Methods

Recent literature was found using the PubMed database using combinations of keywords: pectus excavatum, pediatric, pain management, minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Literature search was conducted by the authorship team and an independent, certified librarian. Articles published in English from 2010-2024 were the focus of our review; however, older literature was included when appropriate.

Key Content and Findings

Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing MIRPE continues to evolve and improve patient outcomes. While evidence supports the use of more traditional analgesia, such as opioid-based or epidural analgesia, it also supports the trend toward contemporary multimodal pain control via pre-, intra-, and post-operative strategies including opioid-sparing analgesics, intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC), intercostal nerve blocks (INBs), and single or continuous infusion regional anesthesia techniques.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing surgical repair of pectus excavatum benefit from the use of contemporary pain control techniques discussed in this review, with a growing body of literature supporting the use of INC, regional pain blocks and multimodal analgesia. Additionally, ERAS pathways and institutional protocols are discussed that are currently transforming postoperative MIRPE pain management and are being implemented widely.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways in Pediatric Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pediatric spinal fusion surgery is a complex procedure that poses challenges in perioperative management. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach is an evidence-based, multidisciplinary strategy to optimize patient care in an individualized, multidisciplinary way. Despite the benefits of ERAS protocol implementation, the role of ERAS in pediatric spine surgery remains understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the current literature regarding pediatric spinal surgery ERAS protocols and their ability to decrease the length of stay, pain, time-to-stand, and complications.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan (version 5.4).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies totaling 2733 patients were included in this analysis. Patients treated in an ERAS protocol had significant reductions in length of stay (P < 0.001), time-to-stand (P < 0.001), total complications (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS protocol implementation can significantly enhance outcomes for pediatric patients receiving spinal surgery. Consequently, ERAS protocols have the potential to lower healthcare expenses, increase access, and set a new standard of care. Future research should be conducted to expand pediatric ERAS protocols to a diverse range of spinal pathologies and assess the long-term advantages of this practice.

Implementing Change: Sustaining Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Pediatric Surgery Using Iterative Assessments

INTRODUCTION

While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are becoming more common in pediatric surgery, there is still little published about protocol compliance and sustainability.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study to evaluate the compliance of an ERAS protocol for pectus repair at a large academic children's hospital. Our primary outcome was overall protocol compliance at 1-y postimplementation of the ERAS protocol. Our comparison group included all pectus repairs for 2 y before protocol implementation.

RESULTS

Overall protocol compliance at 12 mo was 89%. Of the 16 pectus repairs included in the ERAS protocol group, 94% (n = 15) and 94% (n = 15) received preoperative acetaminophen and gabapentin, respectively, which was significantly greater than the historical control group (P < 0.001). For the intraoperative components analyzed, only the intrathecal morphine was significantly different than historical controls (100% versus 49%, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the time from operating room to return to normal diet was shorter for the ERAS group (0.53 d versus 1.16 d, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in readmission rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS protocol compliance varies based on phase of care. Solutions to sustain protocols depend on the institution and the patient population. However, the utilization of implementation science fundamentals was invaluable in this study to identify and address areas for improvement in protocol compliance. Other institutions may adapt these strategies to improve protocol compliance at their centers.

Perioperative Health Interventions in Children With Chronic Neuromuscular Conditions Undergoing Major Musculoskeletal Surgery: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children with chronic neuromuscular conditions (CCNMC) have many coexisting conditions and often require musculoskeletal surgery for progressive neuromuscular scoliosis or hip dysplasia. Adequate perioperative optimization may decrease adverse perioperative outcomes. The purpose of this scoping review was to allow us to assess associations of perioperative health interventions (POHI) with perioperative outcomes in CCNMC.

METHODS

Eligible articles included those published from January 1, 2000 through March 1, 2022 in which the authors evaluated the impact of POHI on perioperative outcomes in CCNMC undergoing major musculoskeletal surgery. Multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched by using controlled vocabulary terms and relevant natural language keywords. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were used to perform the review. A risk of bias assessment for included studies was performed by using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS

A total of 7013 unique articles were initially identified, of which 6286 (89.6%) were excluded after abstract review. The remaining 727 articles' full texts were then reviewed for eligibility, resulting in the exclusion of 709 (97.5%) articles. Ultimately, 18 articles were retained for final analysis. The authors of these studies reported various impacts of POHI on perioperative outcomes, including postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Because of the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures, meta-analyses with pooled data were not feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reveal various impacts of POHI in CCNMC undergoing major musculoskeletal surgery. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to better address the overall impact of specific interventions on perioperative outcomes in CCNMC.

Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for pediatric solid tumors

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, multi-modal approach to decrease surgical stress, expedite recovery, and improve postoperative outcomes. ERAS is increasingly being utilized in pediatric surgery. Its applicability to pediatric patients undergoing abdominal tumor resections remains unknown.

Methods and Analysis

A group of key stakeholders adopted ERAS principles and developed a protocol suitable for the variable complexity of pediatric abdominal solid tumor resections. A multi-center, prospective, propensity-matched case control study was then developed to evaluate the feasibility of the protocol. A pilot-phase was utilized prior to enrollment of all patients older than one month of age undergoing any abdominal, retroperitoneal, or pelvic tumor resections. The primary outcome was 90-day complications per patient. Additional secondary outcomes included: ERAS protocol adherence, length of stay, time to administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, readmissions, reoperations, emergency room visits, pain scores, opioid usage, and differences in Quality of Recovery 9 scores.

Ethics and Dissemination

Institutional review board approval was obtained at all participating centers. Informed consent was obtained from each participating patient. The results of this study will be presented at pertinent society meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. We expect the results will inform peri-operative care for pediatric surgical oncology patients and provide guidance on initiation of ERAS programs. We anticipate this study will take four years to meet accrual targets and complete follow-up.

Trial Registration Number

NCT04344899.

The principles of enhanced recovery after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (ERaPEG): a UK tertiary center experience

PURPOSE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. The aim of the study was to assess whether the implementation of a perioperative enhanced recovery after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (ERaPEG) pathway based on ERAS principles was safe, satisfactory to parents and improved outcomes.

METHODS

Following a quality improvement project, a multimodal ERaPEG pathway was introduced as standard practice within the department and children undergoing elective same-day admission percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) at a single UK tertiary center were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria were patients undergoing other concurrent procedures and those who underwent a laparoscopic assisted/open procedure. Data included patient demographics, underlying diagnosis, indication, length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. Parental experience and satisfaction were determined using a questionnaire including 5-point Likert scales. A retrospective cohort was used for comparison. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square test and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria: 50 pre and 45 post the implementation of ERaPEG. Median age was 3 and 2 years, respectively. Neurodisability was the underlying diagnosis in most patients (84%-pre-ERaPEG; 76%-post-ERaPEG). Most common PEG indication was medication/nutritional supplementation (52%-pre-ERaPEG; 51%-post-ERaPEG). The LOS significantly decreased from a median of 51.5 h (pre-ERaPEG) to 32 h (post-ERaPEG) (p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar (6% vs 11%). Most parents felt that the educational material was easy to access and understand. Post-operatively the majority of parents (≥ 80%) were confident in managing the gastrostomy device, setting up/giving the feeds and also felt that the LOS was appropriate.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the implementation of an ERaPEG pathway significantly reduced LOS following PEG. In addition, the pathway was satisfactory to parents and offered the benefit of improved resource utilization.

Safety and Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Pediatric Colostomy Closure

Aims

To study the safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric colostomy closure.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective observational study of children who underwent colostomy closure. Data were collected from the electronic medical records and telephonic follow-up calls of patients from October 2013 to October 2023, in the Department of Pediatric Surgery of a Tertiary level Medical College. The parameters obtained were age, gender, type of stoma, primary diagnosis, discrepancy in luminal diameters, time to reach full feeds, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. The protocol followed for colostomy closure included the following-no bowel preparation or nasogastric tube, no overnight fasting, single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis, avoiding opioids, packing proximal stoma till mobilization and starting early oral feeds postoperatively. The continuous parameters were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (range) while the descriptive parameters were expressed as number and percentage.

Results

A total of 90 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients had colostomy for anorectal malformation. Five of them had significant luminal discrepancy of 4 or more times. Full feeds were reached within 2 days in 79 patients. Postoperative hospital stay was 2-3 days in 62 patients. Six patients stayed for more than 5 days, due to complications requiring further management. We noted surgical site infection in 6 patients all of whom were managed with regular wound dressings and fecal fistula in 4 cases, two of which resolved spontaneously.

Conclusion

ERAS protocol in colostomy closure reduces the hospital stay and is cost effective, with early recovery and no added complications.

The implementation of a pectus bar insertion enhanced recovery after surgery pathway: A quality improvement initiative

BACKGROUND

Pectus excavatum repair is associated with significant discomfort, and pain is a primary contributor to postoperative hospital length of stay. Recent advances in postoperative pain control include the use of intercostal cryoablation techniques that may now make it possible to discharge patients on the day of surgery. Unnecessary variation in patient care and noncompliance with care bundles may be a factor in extended length of stay. The global aim of this quality improvement initiative was to successfully implement an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. The SMART aim was to have a greater than 70% compliance for the perioperative bundle elements within 1 year of the pathway implementation.

METHODS

Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were designed to create and implement an ERAS pathway for patients undergoing a pectus bar insertion procedure. This multidisciplinary pathway was designed, managed, and implemented with key stakeholders from the Departments of Evidence Based Practice, Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Perioperative Nursing. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and compliance with elements of the pathway were measured for analysis for both the baseline and post-intervention groups with monthly automated reports.

RESULTS

After implementation of the ERAS pathway, data on the first 50 patients showed a 90% compliance with the perioperative bundle elements. Mean length of stay was significantly decreased from 33 h (95% CI [28.76, 37.31]) to 18 h (95% CI [14.54, 21.70]). There were zero readmissions within 24 hours for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Employing a multidisciplinary approach in both planning and execution that standardized clinician practices and minimized unnecessary variation in patient care, an ERAS pathway for pectus bar insertion has been successfully established at our institution.

Role of practice standardization in outcome optimization for CDH

Standardization of care seeks to improve patient outcomes and healthcare delivery by reducing unwanted variations in care as well as promoting the efficient and effective use of healthcare resources. There are many types of standardization, with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), based on a stringent assessment of evidence and expert consensus, being the hallmark of high-quality care. This article outlines the history of CPGs, their benefits and shortcomings, with a specific focus on standardization efforts as it relates to congenital diaphragmatic hernia management.

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery during the perioperative period in children with Meckel's diverticulum-a single-center prospective clinical trial

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in adult surgery. However, few studies have reported the efficacy of ERAS in paediatric patients with Meckel's diverticulum (MD), the aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ERAS in treating MD.

Methods

A prospective randomised controlled study of children with MD admitted to our hospital from Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2023 were conducted, we developed and implemented an ERAS program for this patients. All cases were strictly selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these patients, they were randomly assigned to the ERAS group or the traditional (TRAD) group with random number table row randomization. The main observational indicators were operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, FLACC pain scale results on 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h after surgery, length of postoperative stay (LOPS), time to first defecation, time to first eating after surgery, time to discontinuation of intravenous infusion, total treatment cost, incidence of postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rate and parental satisfaction rate.

Results

A total of 50 patients underwent Meckel's diverticulectomy during this period, 7 patients were excluded, 23 patients were assigned to the ERAS group and 20 patients were assigned to the TRAD group. There were no significant differences in demographic data and operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage. The FLACC pain scale results on 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ERAS group. The LOPS was 6.17 ± 0.89 days in the ERAS group and 8.30 ± 1.26 days in the TRAD group, resulting in a significantly shorter LOPS in ERAS group. ERAS could also reduce the first postoperative defecation time, the time to first eating after surgery and the time to discontinuation of intravenous infusion. The treatment cost was decreased in the ERAS group. The rate of complications and 30-day readmission were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

In this single-center study, the ERAS protocol for patients with MD requiring surgery was safe and effective.

Optimizing the Postoperative Management of Children Undergoing Resection of High-Risk Abdominal Neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment in high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB), but there exists wide variability in perioperative management practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate two standardized adult perioperative enhanced recovery practices (ERPs) in pediatric patients undergoing open resection of abdominal HR-NB.

METHODS

All patients with abdominal HR-NB surgically resected at a free-standing children's hospital between 12/2010 and 7/2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative ERPs of interest included avoidance of routine nasogastric tube (NGT) use and the use of neuraxial anesthesia. Primary outcomes included time to enteral intake, urinary catheter use, opioid utilization, and length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Overall, 37 children, median age 33 months (IQR: 20-48 months), were identified. Avoidance of an NGT allowed for earlier feeding after surgery (P = .03). Neuraxial anesthesia use more frequently required an indwelling urinary catheter (P < .01) for a longer duration (P = .02), with no difference in total opioid utilization (P = .77) compared to patients without neuraxial anesthesia. Postoperative LOS was unaffected by avoidance of routine NGT use (P = .68) or use of neuraxial anesthesia (P = .89).

CONCLUSION

Children undergoing open resection of abdominal HR-NB initiated diet sooner when an NGT was not left postoperatively, and the need for a urinary catheter was significantly higher in patients who received neuraxial anesthesia. However, these two ERP components did not decrease postoperative LOS. To optimize the postoperative management of NB patients, postoperative NGTs should be avoided, while the benefit of neuraxial anesthesia is less clear as it necessitates the placement of a urinary catheter without decreasing opioid utilization.

Gabapentin is Associated With Decreased Postoperative Opioid Use and Length of Stay After Appendectomy in Children With Perforated Appendicitis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gabapentin is increasingly used as an off-label, opioid-sparing pain medication in children. We investigated perioperative gabapentin administration and postoperative opioid use in children who underwent appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of healthy children ages 2-18 years undergoing appendectomy for perforated appendicitis from 2014 to 2019 was performed using the Pediatric Health Information System®. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was conducted with 1:1 matching based on patient and hospital characteristics. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to evaluate an association between gabapentin, postoperative opioid use, and postoperative length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 29,467 children with perforated appendicitis who underwent appendectomy, 236 (0.8%) received gabapentin. In 2014, <10 children received gabapentin, but by 2019, 110 children received gabapentin. On univariate analysis of the PSM cohort, children receiving gabapentin had decreased total postoperative opiate use (2.3 SD ± 2.3 versus 3.0 SD ± 2.5 days, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, children receiving gabapentin had 0.65 fewer days of postoperative total opioid use (95% CI: -1.09, -0.21) and spent 0.69 fewer days in the hospital after surgery (95% CI: -1.30, -0.08).

CONCLUSION

While overall use is infrequent, gabapentin is increasingly administered to children with perforated appendicitis who undergo an appendectomy and is associated with decreased postoperative opioid use and reduced postoperative length of stay. Multimodal pain management strategies incorporating gabapentin may reduce postoperative opioid consumption, but further studies of drug safety are needed for this off-label use in children undergoing surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A Survey on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements in Cleft Palate Repair

This study aims to characterize current use, knowledge, and attitude toward ERAS protocols by academic craniofacial surgeons.

Craniofacial surgeons were provided with electronic surveys.

Electronic survey; Institutional tertiary surgeons.

102 cleft palate surgeons surveyed and 31 completed the survey (30.4%).

None.

Respondents rated their knowledge, use, and willingness to implement perioperative interventions modeled after adult ERAS protocols.

Majority (67.7%) rated they were knowledgeable about ERAS. However, 61.3% "never use" a standardized protocol for cleft palate surgery. Only 3 ERAS elements are currently implemented by a majority of cleft surgeons: avoiding prolonged perioperative fasting (67.7%), using hypothermia prevention measures (74.2%), and minimizing use of opioids (62.5%). A large majority of respondents noted they never administer bolus (71.0%) or infusion (80.6%) dosing of tranexamic acid; most of these surgeons also indicated that administering tranexamic acid "would not be a valuable addition" (67.7% and 71.0%, respectively). Short-acting sedatives are used by 12.9% and by 16.1% of surgeons in all patients during extubation and postoperative recovery, respectively. By contrast, 22.6% never use such agents during extubation and 48.4% never use it during postoperative recovery. Overall, 67.7% of respondents replied that they would be willing to implement an ERAS protocol for cleft palate repair.

Many respondents report using interventions compatible with an ERAS approach and the majority are willing to implement an ERAS protocol for cleft palate repair.

A mixed-method approach to generate and deliver rapid-cycle evaluation feedback: lessons learned from a multicenter implementation trial in pediatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Rapid-cycle feedback loops provide timely information and actionable feedback to healthcare organizations to accelerate implementation of interventions. We aimed to (1) describe a mixed-method approach for generating and delivering rapid-cycle feedback and (2) explore key lessons learned while implementing an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) across 18 pediatric surgery centers.

METHODS

All centers are members of the Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (PedSRC, www.pedsrc.org ), participating in the ENhanced Recovery In CHildren Undergoing Surgery (ENRICH-US) trial. To assess implementation efforts, we conducted a mixed-method sequential explanatory study, administering surveys and follow-up interviews with each center's implementation team 6 and 12 months following implementation. Along with detailed notetaking and iterative discussion within our team, we used these data to generate and deliver a center-specific implementation report card to each center. Report cards used a traffic light approach to quickly visualize implementation status (green = excellent; yellow = needs improvement; red = needs significant improvement) and summarized strengths and opportunities at each timepoint.

RESULTS

We identified several benefits, challenges, and practical considerations for assessing implementation and using rapid-cycle feedback among pediatric surgery centers. Regarding potential benefits, this approach enabled us to quickly understand variation in implementation and corresponding needs across centers. It allowed us to efficiently provide actionable feedback to centers about implementation. Engaging consistently with center-specific implementation teams also helped facilitate partnerships between centers and the research team. Regarding potential challenges, research teams must still allocate substantial resources to provide feedback rapidly. Additionally, discussions and consensus are needed across team members about the content of center-specific feedback. Practical considerations include carefully balancing timeliness and comprehensiveness when delivering rapid-cycle feedback. In pediatric surgery, moreover, it is essential to actively engage all key stakeholders (including physicians, nurses, patients, caregivers, etc.) and adopt an iterative, reflexive approach in providing feedback.

CONCLUSION

From a methodological perspective, we identified three key lessons: (1) using a rapid, mixed method evaluation approach is feasible in pediatric surgery and (2) can be beneficial, particularly in quickly understanding variation in implementation across centers; however, (3) there is a need to address several methodological challenges and considerations, particularly in balancing the timeliness and comprehensiveness of feedback.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NIH National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT04060303. Registered August 7, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04060303.

Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Pediatric Colostomy Reversal

Aim

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) are multimodal perioperative pathways that have shown improved outcomes. ERAS after colostomy reversal has shown promising results in adults and few pediatric studies. We report our experience using ERAS for a colostomy reversal.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of children in whom ERAS was used during colostomy reversal between May 2016 and 2019 was carried out. ERAS protocol in our study included avoiding mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral liquid diet upto 3 h preoperatively, usage of regional anesthesia, minimal handling of bowel intraoperatively, using nonopioid analgesics for pain relief, early initiation of feeding on the first postoperative day, early discharge once full feeds are established. Outcomes analyzed are the duration of hospital stay and complications, including readmissions. Requirement for opioids and anti-emetics are noted. The outcomes are compared with traditional care pathways (TCP), which use MBP, overnight fasting, opioid analgesia, and delayed feeding. A total of 48 are included in the study, with 13 cases using ERAS and TCP in 35 cases.

Statistical Analysis Used

Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used.

Results

In the ERAS group, the mean length of hospital stay (LOS) postoperatively was 3.7 days (2-5 days) as opposed to 7.2 days (5-11 days) in TCP. There was only one child with complications in the ERAS group, while 9 cases in TCP had complications, though none of them required operative intervention. There was the requirement of anti-emetic in only one child in the ERAS group.

Conclusion

ERAS for colostomy reversal is feasible in the pediatric population. For successful implementation, all personnel involved in the care of the child need to be educated about the protocol. It reduces LOS and complications.

Providers' Perceptions Versus Practices Inform Pediatric Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation

INTRODUCTION

There are many barriers to the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. The aim of this study was to compare surgeon and anesthesia perceptions with current practices prior to the initiation of an ERAS protocol in pediatric colorectal patients and to use that information to inform ERAS implementation.

METHODS

This was a mixed method single institution study of barriers to implementation of an ERAS pathway at a free-standing children's hospital. Anesthesiologists and surgeons at a free-standing children's hospital were surveyed regarding current practices of ERAS components. A retrospective chart review was performed of 5- to 18-y-old patients undergoing colorectal procedures between 2013 and 2017, followed by the initiation of an ERAS pathway, and a prospective chart review for 18 mo postimplementation.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% (n = 7) for surgeons and 60% (n = 9) for anesthesiologists. Preoperative nonopioid analgesics and regional anesthesia were rarely used. Intraoperatively, 54.7% of patients had a fluid balance of <10 cc/kg/h and normothermia was achieved in only 38.7%. Mechanical bowel prep was frequently utilized (48%). Median nil per os time was significantly longer than required at 12 h. Postoperatively, 42.9% of surgeons reported that patients could have clears on postoperative day zero, 28.6% on postoperative day one, and 28.6% after flatus. In reality, 53.3% of patients were started on clears after flatus, with a median time of 2 d. Most surgeons (85.7%) expected patients to get out of bed once awake from anesthesia; however, median time that patients were out of bed was postoperative day one. While most surgeons reported frequent use of acetaminophen and/or ketorolac, only 69.3% received any nonopioid analgesic postoperatively, with only 41.3% receiving two or more nonopioid analgesics. Nonopioid analgesia showed the highest rates of improvement from retrospective to prospective: preoperative use of analgesics increased from 5.3% to 41.2% (P < 0.0001), postoperative use of acetaminophen increased by 27.4% (P = 0.5), Toradol by 45.5% (P = 0.11), and gabapentin by 86.7% (P < 0.0001). Postoperative nausea/vomiting prophylaxis with >1 class of antiemetic increased from 8% to 47.1% (P < 0.001). The length of stay was unchanged (5.7 versus 4.4 d, P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

For the successful implementation of an ERAS protocol, perceptions versus reality must be assessed to determine current practices and identify barriers to implementation.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Gastrointestinal Surgery in Children: Practical Tools From Key Stakeholders

INTRODUCTION

We explored patient, caregiver, and provider recommendations for development of a tool kit to implement enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. ERPs are widely used for adults to decrease hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and complications while hastening patient recovery after surgery. With limited data available for ERPs among pediatric populations informed modification of adult ERPs is needed to facilitate successful implementation for pediatric surgery.

METHODS

Using a qualitative research design, semistructured interviews were conducted with hospital-based teams including surgeons, anesthesiologists, gastroenterologists, nursing, and physician assistants. Four in-person focus groups were held at two pediatric hospitals with patients and caregivers. Codes were developed and applied to interview and focus groups transcripts for structural content analysis. Thematic analysis guided by the Active Implementation Framework, included recommendations that informed ERP implementation tool kit development.

RESULTS

Key components of the ERP tool kit included the need for a structured and systematic approach, leadership support from key champions, and buy-in from surgical partners and hospital management. Providers identified the need for multimodal educational materials on ERP elements for staff and patients; use of uniform checklists, care sets and an electronic repository to collect outcome data for quality assurance assessment. Patients and caregivers endorsed expansion of the team to include child-life specialists, nutritionists, and patient-parent supporters to help navigate the surgical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to leverage key input from patients, caregivers, and providers to identify practical components for an ERP implementation tool kit for children undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Glycemic Stress Index: Does It Correlate with the Intensive Care Length of Stay?

Postoperative hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. In adults, perioperative hyperglycemia is influenced by prolonged fasting, but data in children are lacking. The Glycemic Stress Index (GSI) has been shown to predict prolonged Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stays in neurosurgical patients. This study aimed to confirm the correlation between GSI and duration of intubation, PICU stay, and postoperative complications in infants undergoing elective open heart surgery. The correlation between preoperative fasting and GSI was also investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 85 infants ≤ 6 months undergoing elective open heart surgery was performed. GSI values ≥ 3.9 and 4.5 were tested to determine whether they carried a higher incidence of postoperative complications (metabolic uncoupling, kidney injury, ECMO, and death). The correlation between GSI and the length of intubation, PICU stay, and duration of fasting were also investigated. Perioperative factors such as age, weight, blood gas analysis, use of inotropes, and risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery were also analyzed as possible predictors.

RESULTS

GSI correlated with the duration of intubation and PICU stay. A GSI ≥ 4.5, but not 3.9, was associated with a higher incidence of metabolic uncoupling. GSI was not influenced by preoperative fasting. None of the preoperative patient factors analyzed was associated with prolonged intubation, PICU stay, or PICU complications. An abnormal creatinine before surgery increased the risk of developing acute kidney injury postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

GSI may be valuable to predict prolonged intubation, PICU stay, and metabolic derangement in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Fasting does not appear to affect GSI.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in children undergoing abdominal surgery: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal approach that streamlines patient processes before, during, and after surgery. The goal is to reduce surgical stress responses and improve outcomes; however, the impact of ERAS programmes in paediatric abdominal surgery remains unclear. The authors aimed to review the effectiveness of ERAS on clinical outcomes in children undergoing abdominal surgery.

METHOD

CINAHL, CENTRAL, Embase, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published from inception until January 2021. The length of hospital stay (LOS), time to oral intake, time to stool, complication rates, and 30-day readmissions were measured. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4 with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among 2371 records from the initial search, 111 articles were retrieved for full-text screening and 12 were included for analyses. The pooled mean difference (MD) demonstrated reduced LOS (MD -1.96; 95 per cent c.i. -2.75 to -1.17), time to oral intake (MD -3.37; 95 per cent c.i. -4.84 to -1.89), and time to stool (MD -4.19; 95 per cent c.i. -6.37 to -2.02). ERAS reduced postoperative complications by half and 30-day readmission by 36 per cent. Subgroup analyses for continuous outcomes suggested that ERAS was more effective in children than adolescents.

CONCLUSION

ERAS was effective in improving clinical outcomes for paediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Standardized perioperative care reduces colorectal surgical site infection in children: A Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium multicenter analysis

PURPOSE

Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a significant source of patient morbidity and resource utilization in children undergoing colorectal surgery. We examined the utility of a protocolized perioperative care bundle in reducing SSI in pediatric patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients ≤18 years of age undergoing colorectal surgery at ten United States children's hospitals. Using a perioperative care protocol comprising eight elements, or "colon bundle", we divided patients into low (1-4 elements) or high (5-8 elements) compliance cohorts. Procedures involving colorectal repair or anastomosis with abdominal closure were included. Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between low and high compliance cohorts. Compliance was compared with a retrospective cohort. The primary outcome was superficial SSI incidence at 30 days.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-six patients were included in our analysis: 138 from the low compliance cohort and 198 from the high compliance cohort. Age and gender were similar between groups. Preoperative diagnosis was similar except for more patients in the high compliance cohort having inflammatory bowel disease (18.2% versus 5.8%, p<0.01). The most common procedure performed was small bowel to colorectal anastomosis. Wound classification and procedure acuity were similar between groups. Superficial SSI at 30 days occurred less frequently among the high compliance compared to the low compliance cohort (4% versus 9.7%, p = 0.036). Median postoperative length of stay and 30-day rates of readmission, reoperation, intra-abdominal abscess and anastomotic leak requiring operation were not significantly different between groups. None of the individual colon bundle elements were independently protective against superficial SSI.

CONCLUSION

Standardization of perioperative care is associated with a reduction in superficial SSI in pediatric colorectal surgery. Expansion of standardized protocols for children undergoing colorectal surgery may improve outcomes and decrease perioperative morbidity.

TYPE OF STUDY

Clinical Research Paper LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Baseline assessment of enhanced recovery after pediatric surgery in mainland China

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a clinical pathway that optimizes perioperative management based on evidence-based medicine. ERAS has been gradually introduced to pediatric surgery in recent years. However, there are limited reports on its overall implementation. We aimed to determine the implementation of ERAS in patients who received pediatric surgery in mainland China.

METHODS

We designed a questionnaire involving 17 key ERAS elements and sent the questionnaire to 66 chiefs of pediatric surgery distributed throughout 31 provinces in mainland China to obtain a baseline assessment of the assimilation of ERAS protocols in the care of congenital biliary dilatation (CBD).

RESULTS

A total of 66 questionnaires were collected. The range of elements implemented at participating centers was 4-16, with a mean of 10.23. The least commonly practiced elements were administration of non-opioid preoperative analgesia (6 centers, 9.09%), prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] (9 centers, 13.64%), and postoperative pain management (26 centers, 39.39%).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of elements differed from center to center. Measures relying primarily on anesthesiologists had lower execution. The adherence to ERAS elements was often inhibited by a lack of institutional support, poor knowledge of ERAS protocols, and difficulties in coordinating multidisciplinary care, as well intransigence in changing surgical practices out of fear of liability for poor outcomes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of early enteral nutrition as an isolated component of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery [ERAS] in children after bowel anastomosis surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative feeding practices are not uniform in children undergoing bowel anastomosis surgery. Primary aim of this review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early enteral nutrition (EEN) as an isolated component of enhanced recovery in children undergoing bowel anastomosis surgery.

METHODS

Medical search engines (PubMed, CENTRAL, Google scholar) were accessed from inception to January 2021. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)s, non-randomized controlled trials, observational studies and retrospective studies comparing EEN, initiated within 48 h vs late enteral nutrition (LEN), initiated after 48 h in children ≤ 18 years undergoing bowel anastomosis surgery were included. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative complications (anastomotic leak, abdominal distension, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, vomiting and septic complications). Secondary outcome measures were the time to passage of first feces and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twelve hundred and eighty-six children from 10 studies were included in this review. No difference was seen between the EEN and LEN groups in the incidence of anastomotic leak (1.69% vs 4.13%; p = 0.06), abdominal distention (13.87% vs 12.31%; p = 0.57), wound dehiscence (3.07% vs 2.69%; p = 0.69) or vomiting (8.11% vs 8.67%; p = 0.98). The incidence of surgical site infections (7.51% vs 11.72%; p = 0.04), septic complications (14.02% vs 26.22%; p = 0.02) as well as pooled overall complications (8.11% vs 11.27%; RR 0.71; 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.89; p = 0.003; I² = 33%) were significantly lower in the EEN group. The time to passage of first feces (MD - 17.23 h; 95% CI -23.13 to -11.34; p < 0.00001; I² = 49%) and the length of hospital stay (MD -2.95 days; 95% CI -3.73 to -2.17; p < 0.00001; I² = 93%) were significantly less in the EEN group.

CONCLUSION

EEN is safe and effective in children following bowel anastomosis surgery and is associated with a lower overall incidence of complications as compared to LEN. EEN also promotes early bowel recovery and hospital discharge. However, further well designed RCTs are required to validate these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Elective choledochal cyst excision is associated with improved postoperative outcomes in children

PURPOSE

The majority of pediatric patients with choledochal cysts (CDC) are symptomatic prior to undergoing CDC excision. This study investigated the impact of surgical timing of CDC excision on postoperative outcomes among children.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 59 patients undergoing open CDC excision with Roux-Y hepaticojejunostomy between 2000 and 2020. Patients were grouped based on whether they underwent an electively scheduled or urgent CDC excision, as defined as CDC excision within the same admission due to CDC-related symptoms. Patient characteristics and perioperative data were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent an elective surgery were older, had more Todani-type 1 CDC, and had decreased postoperative hospital length of stay and opioid use compared to patients who underwent CDC excision within the same admission due to CDC-related symptoms. No significant differences emerged regarding postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis showed that elective cyst excision (HR = 0.55, p = 0.04; HR = 0.59, p = 0.008) and type 1 CDC (HR = 0.32, p = 0.03; HR = 0.12, p < 0.001) were independently associated with decreased opioid use and postoperative hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective CDC excision is associated with shortened hospital stay and decreased opioid use among children compared to patients who undergo a CDC excision during the same admission for CDC-related symptoms.

Age- and Sex-Specific Needs for Children Undergoing Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

The use of enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) is extending to pediatric surgical populations, such as patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Given the variation in age- and sex-specific characteristics of pediatric IBD patients, it is important to understand the unique needs of subgroups, such as male versus female or preadolescent versus older patients, when implementing ERPs. We gathered clinician, patient, and caregiver perspectives on age- and sex-specific needs for children undergoing IBD surgery.

METHODS

We used semistructured interviews and focus groups to assess ERP needs and perceived differences in needs between preadolescent (10-13 y), older (14-19 y), male, and female IBD patients. Participants included clinicians, patients who had recent IBD surgery, and patients' caregivers.

RESULTS

Forty-eight clinicians, six patients, and eight caregivers participated. Three broad categories of themes emerged: concerns, needs, and experiences related to the (1) surgical care process; (2) continuum of IBD care; and (3) suggestions to make surgical care more patient centered. With regard to surgical care processes, stakeholders reported different communication needs for preadolescent and older children. Key themes about the continuum of IBD care were the need (1) for support from child life specialists and (b) to address young women's health issues. Suggestions to make surgical care more patient centered included providing older children with patient experiences that reflect their perspective as young adults.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the need to adopt a patient-centered approach for ERP use that actively addresses age- and sex-specific factors while engaging patients and caregivers as partners with clinicians to improve surgical care for children with IBD.

Follow-up Plan as a Necessity for Nursing Care: A Decrease of Stress in Mothers with their Children in Pediatric Surgical Units

Introduction: Children are vulnerable to damage. Health problems in children, especially if necessitate hospitalization, can cause stress in their parents that may persist even long after discharge. This study aimed to investigate the effect of implementing follow-up care plans on stress in mothers of children discharged from pediatric surgical units.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 64 mothers whose children were hospitalized in the surgical wards of two educational hospitals affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups of control and experimental. The data collection tools included a demographic data questionnaire and stress response inventory (SRI). The interventions were performed using a four-stage follow-up care plan. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 13 and descriptive statistics, independent t-test, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and least significant difference (LSD) test.

Results: The mean (SD) stress scores of the experimental group were 64.1 (28.8), 20.4 (12.4), and 11.6 (7.5) before, one week, and one month after the intervention, respectively. In the control group, these scores were 61.2 (29.2), 59.9 (25.5), and 46.7 (19.1), respectively. The results showed the mean score was significantly lower than that of the control group at one week and one month after the intervention in the experimental group.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that a follow-up care plan can decrease the stress levels of mothers as a continuity of patient care even after discharge.

Observations from Implementation of the ERAS Protocol after DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multivariate intervention requiring the help of several departments, including anesthesia, nursing, and surgery. This study seeks to observe ERAS compliance rates and obstacles for its implementation at a single academic institution.

METHODS

 This is a retrospective study looking at patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction from January 2016 to September 2019. The ERAS protocol was implemented on select patients early 2017, with patients from 2016 acting as a control. Thirteen points from the protocol were identified and gathered from the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate compliance.

RESULTS

 Two hundred and six patients were eligible for the study, with 67 on the control group. An average of 6.97 components were met in the pre-ERAS group. This number rose to 8.33 by the end of 2017. Compliance peaked with 10.53 components met at the beginning of 2019. The interventions most responsible for this increase were administration of preoperative medications, goal-oriented intraoperative fluid management, and administration of scheduled gabapentin postoperatively. The least met criterion was intraoperative ketamine goal of >0.2 mg/kg/h, with a maximum compliance rate of 8.69% of the time.

CONCLUSION

 The introduction of new protocols can take over a year for full implementation. This is especially true for protocols as complex as an ERAS pathway. Even after years of consistent use, compliance gaps remain. Staff-, patient-, or resource-related issues are responsible for these discrepancies. It is important to identify these issues to address them and optimize patient outcomes.

A Comparison of Adult and Pediatric Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathways: A Move for Standardization

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) are a multimodal approach to standardize perioperative care. To substantiate the benefit of a pediatric-centered pathway, we compared outcomes of children treated with pediatric ERP (pERP) versus adult (aERP) pathways. We aimed to compare components of each pathway to create a new comprehensive pERP to reduce variation in care.

METHODS

Retrospective study of children (≤18 y) undergoing elective colorectal surgery from August 2015 to April 2019 at a single institution managed with pERP versus aERP. Multivariable linear and logistic regression, adjusting for demographics and operation characteristics, were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 100 hospitalizations (72 patients) were identified, including 37 treated with pERP. pERP patients were, on average, younger (13 versus 16 y), more likely to be ASA III (70% versus 30%), and more likely to receive regional (32% versus 3%) or neuraxial (35% versus 8%) anesthesia. Epidural use was an independent risk factor for longer length of stay (P = 0.000). After adjustment, pERP patients had similar LOS and time to oral intake, but shorter foley duration. pERP patients used significantly fewer opioids and were less likely to return to the operating room within 30 d. 30-d readmissions and ED visits were also lower, but this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, data from both ERPs contributed formation of a synthesized pathway and reflected the pERP approach to opioid utilization and the aERP approach to earlier enteral nutrition.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in children

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a systematic approach to optimize a patient's health and improve clinical outcomes, increase patient satisfaction and decrease healthcare costs. Enhanced recovery protocols have been used across a variety of surgical disciplines and patient groups to improve patient safety and reduce hospital length of stay without increasing return visits to the system. ERAS involves the application of clinical decision making throughout the patient experience with interventions in the preoperative, perioperative and post operative phases. In addition, ERAS is multidisciplinary and the success of an ERAS program is dependent on the effort and integration of stakeholders across the healthcare system. Utilization of ERAS systems have grown across the global adult surgical community over the last three decades and adoption in pediatric surgery has only occurred recently. Hospitals in both adult and pediatric surgery have found that implementation of ERAS systems lead to a shortened length of stay and reduced complications without increasing patient returns to the system. Importantly patients who have surgery within an ERAS program experience less pain, less opioid utilization, a quicker recovery and increased satisfaction. In pediatric surgery ERAS has successfully been employed across most all disciplines from congenital cardiac surgery to colorectal surgery. The evolution of ERAS continues as a paradigm of quality and safety.

Optimizing Outcomes After Cleft Palate Repair: Design and Implementation of a Perioperative Clinical Care Pathway

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the development process and clinical impact of implementing a standardized perioperative clinical care pathway for cleft palate repair.

DESIGN

Medical records of patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair prior to pathway implementation were retrospectively reviewed as a historical control group (N = 40). The historical cohort was compared to a prospectively collected group of patients who were treated according to the pathway (N = 40).

PATIENTS

Healthy, nonsyndromic infants undergoing primary cleft palate repair at a tertiary care pediatric hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

A novel, standardized pathway was created through an iterative process, combining literature review with expert opinion and discussions with institutional stakeholders. The pathway integrated multimodal analgesia throughout the perioperative course and included intraoperative bilateral maxillary nerve blocks. Perioperative protocols for preoperative fasting, case timing, antiemetics, intravenous fluid management, and postoperative diet advancement were standardized.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes include: (1) length of hospital stay, (2) cumulative opioid consumption, (3) oral intake postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients treated according to the pathway had shorter mean length of stay (31 vs 57 hours, P < .001), decreased cumulative morphine consumption (77 vs 727 μg/kg, P < .001), shorter time to initiate oral intake (9.3 vs 22 hours, P = .01), and greater volume of oral intake in first 24 hours postoperatively (379 vs 171 mL, P < .001). There were no differences in total anesthesia time, total surgical time, or complication rates between the control and treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a standardized perioperative clinical care pathway for primary cleft palate repair is safe, feasible, and associated with reduced length of stay, reduced opioid consumption, and improved oral intake postoperatively.

Opioid prescribing patterns following implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric patients undergoing lower tract urologic reconstruction

BACKGROUND

With increasing awareness of the opioid epidemic, there is a push for providers to minimize opioid prescriptions. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a comprehensive multidisciplinary perioperative protocol that includes minimization of opioid analgesia in favor of non-opioid alternatives and regional analgesia. While ERAS protocols have consistently been shown to decrease inpatient opioid utilization, the impact on opioid prescribing practices and use after discharge in pediatric surgical patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the impact of an ERAS protocol on outpatient opioid prescription patterns after pediatric lower urinary tract reconstructive surgery. We hypothesize that implementation of an ERAS protocol leads to fewer outpatient opioid prescriptions as measured by number and total quantity of oral morphine milligram equivalents by body weight per patient.

METHODS

All patients who underwent bladder augmentation, creation of a continent catheterizable channel, bladder neck reconstruction or closure, or revision of prior reconstructive procedures at our tertiary care facility between 2011 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients were divided into pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts based on whether surgery occurred before or after ERAS implementation. The Colorado Prescription Drug Monitoring Program was used to track filling of postoperative opioid prescriptions for patients covered by the database.

RESULTS

A total of 167 urologic reconstructive surgeries were analyzed, including 83 before ERAS and 84 after ERAS implementation. Patients in the ERAS cohort received and filled more outpatient opioid prescriptions at time of discharge (82.6% historical vs 93.9% ERAS, p = 0.015; 76.1% vs 57.9%, p = 0.012). There were no differences in prescription total morphine milligram equivalents normalized to body mass, total days supplied, or 90-day opioid prescription refill rates.

DISCUSSION

We found an unexpected increase in postoperative outpatient opioid prescriptions following implementation of an ERAS protocol for lower urinary tract reconstructive surgery. Possible reasons include worry about pain crisis at home in the setting of decreased hospital length of stay in the ERAS cohort or generalized upward drift in opioid prescribing patterns over time. ERAS protocols in other subspecialties reveal mixed findings but consistently suggest standardization of outpatient opioid prescribing patterns leads to a decrease in opioid prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients received more, not fewer, outpatient opioid prescriptions following major urologic reconstructive surgery after implementation of an ERAS protocol. Purposeful efforts should be made to standardize opioid prescriptions at discharge based on meaningful clinical criteria.

An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in pediatric colorectal surgery improves patient outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in adult colorectal surgery are known to reduce complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). However, there is a paucity of ERAS data for pediatric colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A 2014-2018 single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric colorectal surgery patients (2-18 years) pre- and post-ERAS pathway implementation. Bivariate analysis and linear regression were used to determine if ERAS pathway implementation reduced total morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram (MME/kg), LOS, and time to oral intake.

RESULTS

98 (70.5%) and 41 (29.5%) patients were managed with ERAS and non-ERAS pathways, respectively. There was no statistical difference in age, sex, diagnosis, or use of laparoscopic technique between cohorts. The ERAS cohort experienced a significant reduction in total MME/kg, Foley duration, time to oral intake, and LOS with no increase in complications. The presence of an ERAS pathway reduced the total MME/kg (-0.071, 95% CI -0.10, -0.043) when controlling for covariates.

CONCLUSION

The use of an ERAS pathway reduces opioid utilization, which is associated with a reduction in LOS and expedites the initiation of oral intake, in colorectal pediatric surgery patients. Pediatric ERAS pathways should be incorporated into the care of pediatric patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III evidence.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

Enhanced recovery after surgery for the treatment of congenital duodenal obstruction

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in adult surgery. However, ERAS has not been reported in neonatal surgery. The present prospective study explored the application value of ERAS in treating congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO).

METHODS

A total of 68 cases of CDO were collected from October 1, 2017 to July 31, 2019. We divided patients with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital duodenal obstruction into the ERAS group and those who were diagnosed the disease after birth into the control group. The ERAS group adopted ERAS-related measures, and the control group followed the usual measures. The study compared the differences in the gestational age, birth weight, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, feeding intolerance, and weight one month after surgery between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were included in the analysis, including 23 who were allocated to the ERAS group and 26 to the control group. The LOS was 9.696±1.222 days in the ERAS group and 12.654±1.686 days in the control group, resulting in a significantly shorter LOS in the ERAS group than in the control group (p<0.001). One month after surgery, the neonates in the ERAS group weighted significantly more than those in the control group. No differences were observed in birth weight, gestational age, and the incidence of complications or feeding intolerance between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In this single-center study, the implementation of neonate-specific ERAS for CDO surgery was feasible and safe and led to a shorter LOS without increasing the incidence of complications or feeding intolerance.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment Study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

An enhanced recovery programme improves the comfort and outcomes in children with obstructive sleep apnoea undergoing adenotonsillectomy: A retrospective historical control study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme on postoperative rehabilitation in children with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) during the perioperative period of adenotonsillectomy.

DESIGN

A retrospective historical control study.

SETTING

Service improvement project.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 394 children with OSA (207 males, 187 females; age range, 2.5 years to 14 years) who underwent adenotonsillectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The children who had undergone adenoidal ablation and bilateral tonsillectomy were divided into an ERAS group (208 patients) treated with the combined optimisation measures and a control group (186 patients) treated with traditional measures during the perioperative period. The postoperative incidence of complications, pain scores, anxiety scores and postoperative diets in the two groups were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients in the ERAS group had significantly a lower overall complication rate and incidence of fever for 2 weeks of follow-up when compared to patients in the control group through the application of perioperative optimisation measures. Furthermore, patients in the ERAS group had less post-surgical pain, had better dietary intake at days 1, 3 and 7 after surgery and had lower preoperative anxiety scores after admission education and while waiting in the operation room.

CONCLUSION

The ERAS programme consisting of combined optimisation measures can reduce physical and psychological trauma during the perioperative period of adenotonsillectomy performed for children with OSA.

Minimizing variance in pediatric surgical care through implementation of a perioperative colon bundle: A multi-institution retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Employing an institutional initiative to minimize variance in pediatric surgical care, we implemented a set of perioperative bundled interventions for all colorectal procedures to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs).

METHODS

Implementation of a standard colon bundle at two children's hospitals began in December 2014. Subjects who underwent a colorectal procedure during the study period were analyzed. Demographics, outcomes, and complications were compared with Wilcoxon Rank-Sum, Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of time period (independent of protocol implementation) on the rate of subsequent infection.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-five patients were identified (preprotocol=68, postprotocol= 77). Gender, diagnosis, procedure performed and wound classification were similar between groups. Superficial SSIs (21% vs. 8%, p=0.031) and readmission (16% vs. 4%, p=0.021) were significantly decreased following implementation of a colon bundle. Median hospital days, cost, reoperation, intraabdominal abscess, and anastomotic leak were unchanged before and after protocol implementation (all p > 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression found time period to be independent of SSIs (OR: 0.810, 95% CI: 0.576-1.140).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a standard pediatric perioperative colon bundle can reduce superficial SSIs. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of colon bundles in reducing complications, hospital stay and cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III - Retrospective cohort study.

The impact of an enhanced recovery perioperative pathway for pediatric pectus deformity repair

PURPOSE

Pediatric repair of chest wall deformities is associated with significant pain, morbidity, and resource utilization. We sought to determine outcomes of a perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing minimally invasive (Nuss) and traditional (Ravitch) corrective procedures.

METHODS

Our ERAS protocol was implemented in 2015. We performed a retrospective review of patients for Nuss or Ravitch procedures before and after ERAS implementation. Combined and procedure segregated bivariate analyses were conducted on postoperative outcomes and resource utilization.

RESULTS

There are 17 patients in the pre-intervention group (Nuss = 13 and Ravitch = 4) compared to 38 patients in the post-intervention group (Nuss = 28 and Ravitch = 10). Protocol implementation increased utilization of pre-operative non-narcotic medication. The combined and Nuss post-intervention groups had a significant decrease in epidural duration and time to enteral medications, but had increased total postoperative opioid usage. The Ravitch post-intervention group had a significant decrease in intra-operative narcotics and discharge pain scores. There were no differences in length of stay or complications.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of our ERAS protocol standardized pectus perioperative care, but did not improve postoperative opioid usage, complications, or resource utilization. Alterations in the protocol may lead to achieving desired goals of better pain management and decreased resource utilization.

Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in pectus excavatum patients following Nuss procedure

Background

Evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on postoperative recovery quality of pectus excavatum patients with Nuss procedure.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing Nuss procedure from the Department of Thoracic Surgery of The Cancer Hospital of China Medical University between September 2016 and September 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups by perioperative management: the traditional procedure group (T group) and the ERAS strategy group (E group). The outcome measures were postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital time, and postoperative complications measured by the Clavien-Dindo method.

Results

Of the 168 patients from this time period, 148 met the inclusion criteria (75 in Group T and 73 in Group E). All operations involved in this study were completed successfully. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with respect to baseline demographics (P>0.05). In Group E, postoperative drainage time (2.53±0.72 vs. 3.45±2.07 days) and postoperative hospitalization time (4.96±1.48 vs. 7.71±7.78 days) were statistically significantly better than those in Group T (P<0.05). There was no difference in overall postoperative complications as measured by Clavien–Dindo score.

Conclusions

The measures of no indwelling urinary catheter (IDUC), laryngeal mask anesthesia, and indwelling tubule drainage can improve postoperative recovery quality of pectus excavatum patients following Nuss procedure.

Expanded Analysis of a Modified Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Cleft Palatoplasty

OBJECTIVE

We have previously shown the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric cleft palatoplasty for proof of concept (POC). We sought to validate the efficacy of ERAS when expanded to patients of variable age and complexity undergoing primary palatoplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Between April 2017 and December 2018, 100 patients were collected prospectively for the expanded assessment (ERAS₂) and POC (ERAS₁) and compared to historical controls both independently and in aggregate (ERAS_(T)). We compared patient demographics, perioperative narcotic administration, length of stay (LOS), and rates of return to service (RTS).

RESULTS

Despite increased complexity, total narcotic usage (morphine equivalents normalized per weight) during each phase of care was significantly greater in controls when compared to ERAS₁, ERAS₂, or ERAS_T, respectively (intraoperative: 0.44 mg/kg vs 0.013 mg/kg vs 0.016 mg/kg vs 0.014 mg/kg; postanesthesia care unit: 0.061 mg/kg vs 0.006 mg/kg vs 0.007 mg/kg vs 0.007 mg/kg; postoperative: 0.389 mg/kg vs 0.009 mg/kg vs 0.026 mg/kg vs 0.017 mg/kg). ERAS₁ and ERAS₂ groups each demonstrated a decrease in LOS (-36.6%, -26.3%) when compared to controls. Overall, application of ERAS led to a 95.7% reduction in narcotic administration and a 31.7% decrease in LOS when compared to controls. The incidence of RTS was higher in ERAS₂ (13.0%) when compared to ERAS₁ (2.1%) or controls (2.4%), with the strongest independent predictor being a positive perioperative respiratory viral panel (PRVP).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of ERAS to palatoplasty patients of advanced age and complexity evidenced consistency with respect to decreased perioperative narcotic administration and shortened LOS. A positive PRVP was found to be an independent predictor of RTS even when ERAS was applied.

Nutritional Advancement in the Hospitalized Child After NPO: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

A clear-liquid diet is commonly used after a nil per os (NPO) order in children recovering from acute gastrointestinal (GI) illnesses. Our purpose for this study was to compare outcomes in patients receiving a clear-liquid diet after an NPO order with outcomes in those receiving a regular diet.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged 1 to 18 years admitted to a tertiary care children's hospital between 2016 and 2017 were screened to identify those who had an NPO order placed for acute GI illnesses. Patients with complex medical needs, a feeding disorder, or chronic GI disorders were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 39 total patients, 17 (44%) received a clear-liquid diet after an NPO order. There was no difference in diet tolerance between patients receiving a clear-liquid diet and those receiving a regular diet on the basis of emesis in the first 12 hours (P = .40), pain scores after the first oral intake (P = .86), return to clear-liquid diet (P = .57), or return to NPO status (P > .99). Patients started on a clear-liquid diet had a longer length of stay (LOS) after diet initiation compared with those receiving a regular diet (median: 43.7 hours [interquartile range: 29.8-53.4] vs median: 20.8 hours [interquartile range 6.7-47.3]), both in the univariate analysis (P = .01) and after controlling for age, diagnosis category, and pain score before and after the first oral intake (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients transitioned to a clear-liquid diet after NPO status have a longer LOS after the first oral intake independent of patient age, diagnosis, and pretransition abdominal pain. Both groups had similar diet tolerance, suggesting that transition to a regular diet after NPO status may decrease LOS without significant adverse effects.

Is a nasogastric tube necessary after transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis?

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the necessity of postoperative nasogastric tube (NGT) use in acute pediatric cases of perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

All cases of acute pediatric perforated appendicitis managed with transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy at our hospital from 2011 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-two cases were selected and divided into two groups based on NGT placement.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in most parameters of patient demographics, or surgical data. Notably, the mean time to first oral intake and to regular diet was significantly shorter in no-NGT group (1 day vs 3 days, P < 0.0001; and 4 days vs 7 days, P = 0.003, respectively). Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in no-NGT group (7 days vs 9 days, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Considering the results of our analysis, we believe that routine NGT placement is not always necessary in these situations.

Opioid use and length of stay following minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair in 436 patients - Benefits of an enhanced recovery pathway

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) at a high volume center, hypothesizing it is associated with decreased opioid requirement and shorter hospital stay.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into pre-ERP (1998-2006), transition (2007-2011), and ERP (2012-2017) cohorts. Data were abstracted from medical records. Univariate and multivariable analyses compared opioid utilization, length of stay (LOS), and complications between cohorts. Opioids were converted to morphine daily dose per kilogram (MEDD/kg).

RESULTS

Of 436 patients, 186 were ERP, 104 were transition, and 146 were pre-ERP. ERP was associated with decreased hospital opioid utilization (mean MEDD/kg 0.5 ± 0.2 vs 0.7 ± 0.4 vs 0.7 ± 0.8 p < .001) and shorter median LOS (3 vs 4 vs 5 days, p < .001) despite equivalent pain scores at discharge (2.7 ± 0.1 vs 2.8 ± 0.2 vs 2.9 ± 0.3, p = .73). Most ERP patients (76%) had LOS ≤3 days. Differences in LOS between ERP, transition, and pre-ERP persisted on multivariable analysis after adjusting for confounding factors. Post-operative complications were rare and not different between groups (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of our ERP was associated with decreased opioid requirement and shorter hospital stay. ERPs are a valuable tool in pediatric surgery given the current emphasis on optimizing opioid and resource utilization.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Retrospective comparative study).

Trends in hospital length of stay and 30-day morbidity in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection, 2012-2016

PURPOSE

To examine postoperative length of stay (LOS), hospital readmission, and 30-day complications in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection in a contemporary cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Project, Pediatric (NSQIP-P) 2012-2016 participant user files for patients <19 years old who underwent laparoscopic ileocecal resection. Mean postoperative LOS, hospital readmission and both wound-specific and composite complications were calculated and compared by year of operation.

RESULTS

348 patients were identified (range, 46-96 per year); 55.2-69.8% of these were admitted the day of operation, with a nonsignificant increase in frequency over the study period. Postoperative LOS ranged from 5.4 ± 2.9 days to 7.3 ± 9.1 days (p = 0.24). In subset analysis of only those patients admitted on the day of operation, postoperative LOS remained relatively long, ranging from 5.0 ± 3.0 days to 5.7 ± 4.0 days (p = 0.89). 30-day hospital readmission proportions rose insignificantly, from 6.9% in 2012 to 15.5% in 2016 (p = 0.41). Wound complication rates (including superficial, deep, and deep organ space infections, as well as wound dehiscence) ranged from 0.0% to 8.6%, but did not vary in a statistically significant manner. Nonwound complication rates were vanishingly small.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative LOS in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection in a select group of patients cared for in hospitals participating in NSQIP-P has not decreased in the past 5 years despite emerging evidence of the safety and relevance of enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Opportunities for shortening LOS without compromising patient safety may still exist.

LEVEL-OF-EVIDENCE

III Retrospective comparative study.