1
|
Dammann E, Ording-Müller LS, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Ville de Goyet J, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kaliciński P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Brinkert F, Petit P, Herrmann J. European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (3) postoperative imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:276-284. [PMID: 38285190 PMCID: PMC10830633 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05842-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of postoperative complications. So far, limited data is available regarding the best radiologic approach to monitor children after liver transplantation. OBJECTIVE To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. This paper reports the responses related to postoperative imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. RESULTS All sites commence ultrasound (US) monitoring within 24 h after liver transplantation. Monitoring frequency varies across sites, ranging from every 8 h to 72 h in early, and from daily to sporadic use in late postoperative phases. Predefined US protocols are used by 73% of sites. This commonly includes gray scale, color Doppler, and quantitative flow assessment. Alternative flow imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography are applied at 31.8%, 18.2%, and 63.6% of sites, respectively. Computed tomography is performed at 86.4% of sites when clarification is needed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used for selected cases at 36.4% of sites, mainly for assessment of biliary abnormalities or when blood tests are abnormal. CONCLUSION Diagnostic imaging is extensively used for postoperative surveillance of children after liver transplantation. While US is generally prioritized, substantial differences were noted in US protocol, timing, and monitoring frequency. The study highlights potential areas for future optimization and standardization of imaging, essential for conducting multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lil-Sofie Ording-Müller
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital: Oslo universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kaliciński
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals: Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hong SY, Yi NJ, Hong K, Han ES, Suh S, Lee JM, Hong SK, Choi Y, Jin US, Chang H, Lee KW, Suh KS, Minn KW. Redo hepatic artery reconstruction for thrombosis without retransplantation in 1355 adult living donor liver transplantations. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:961-969. [PMID: 37254603 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after liver transplantation is associated with a marked increase in morbidity, leading to graft and patient loss. We evaluated the outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation patients with HAT under an aggressive surgical intervention. A total of 1355 recipients underwent adult living donor liver transplantation at the Seoul National University Hospital. Surgical redo reconstruction for HAT was performed in all cases except in those with graft hepatic artery injury and late detection of HAT. Postoperative HAT developed in 33 cases (2.4%) at a median time of 3.5 days. Thirty patients (90.9%) underwent redo-arterial reconstruction. The survival rates in patients with HAT were similar to the rates in those without HAT (72.7% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.115). Although graft survival rates were lower in patients with HAT (84.8%) than in those without HAT (98.0%) ( p < 0.001), the graft survival rate was comparable (92.0% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.124) in the 25 patients with successful revascularization. Biliary complication rates were higher in patients with HAT (54.5%) than in those without HAT (32.0%) ( p = 0.008). In conclusion, the successful redo reconstruction under careful selection criteria saved the graft without retransplantation in 96.0% of the cases. Surgical revascularization should be preferentially considered for the management of HAT in adult living donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwangpyo Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sanggyun Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ung Sik Jin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hak Chang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Won Minn
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beyzaei Z, Bagheri Z, Karimzadeh S, Geramizadeh B. Outcome of liver transplantation in hepatic glycogen storage disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14867. [PMID: 36433721 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver transplantation (LT) is the choice of therapeutic option for end-stage hepatic GSD patients; however, reports about the long-term outcome of LT in these patients have remained controversial. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published until Dec 31, 2021, that investigated the long-term outcome of LT in hepatic GSD patients. A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE,Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed. RESULTS 14 studies with 210 patients were included in our analysis. As the results showed, the pooled proportion of GSD patients with complications after liver transplant (e.g., hemorrhagic shock, biliary complications, tacrolimus encephalopathy, chronic hepatitis, hepatic artery thrombosis, hepatic adenoma, sepsis, liver dysfunction, chronic rejection, acute cellular rejection, and CMV infection) was 27.7% (95% CI: 20.42-35.67) without heterogeneity (I2 = 24.04%), as calculated by the random-effect model. The pooled proportion of GSD patients with complications related to GSD after LT, including HCC (Hepatocellular carcinoma), renal complication, muscle problems, delayed menarche, persistent neutropenia, pneumonitis, renal failure, and hepatic adenoma was 22.2% (95% CI: 7.97-40.01) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 82.47%). Subgroup analysis including the age of patients (adult/pediatric), duration of follow-up, and type of donor was conducted to investigate the resources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION According to our investigation and review analysis, most GSD patients showed significant outcome improvement after liver transplantation. Overall, our findings showed an excellent outcome of liver transplantation in GSD patients; however, it needs further investigations to be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Beyzaei
- Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Zahra Bagheri
- Department of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sara Karimzadeh
- Shiraz Medical School Library, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Bita Geramizadeh
- Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.,Department of Pathology, Medical School of Shiraz University, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoo BM, Hong SY, Hong SK, Ahn YH, Kang HG, Lee S, Suh S, Han ES, Lee JM, Choi Y, Lee KW, Suh KS, Yi NJ. Posttransplant renal replacement therapy is an alarm signal for survival outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14422. [PMID: 36325595 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on the long-term survival outcomes of pediatric liver recipients remains controversial. METHODS A total of 224 patients aged <18 years, who underwent liver transplantation (LT), were divided into two groups: patients who underwent renal replacement therapy (RRT) (group R, n = 25, 11.2%) and those who did not (group N, n = 199, 88.8%). The posttransplant patient survival outcomes according to RRT use constituted the primary end-point. RRT was initiated preoperatively in 12 patients (48.0%) and postoperatively in 13 [early: <6 months after LT (n = 5, 20.0%) and late: ≥6 months after LT (n = 8, 32.0%)]. The indications for RRT included liver disease involving the kidney (44.0%) and hepatorenal syndrome (56.0%). RESULTS The age at the time of LT (71.6 vs. 19.1 months) was higher, the pediatric end-stage liver disease score was lower (9.9 vs. 21.2), and the duration of hospitalization posttransplantation (41.0 vs. 27.0 days) was longer, while the rates of hepatic artery thrombosis (8.0% vs. 3.5%) were higher in group R (p < .05). The number of patients (60.0% vs. 93.0%; p < .001) and graft survival rates (68.0% vs. 93.0%; p < .001) were significantly lower in group R. Multivariate analysis revealed that posttransplant RRT and hepatic artery complications were risk factors for patient survival outcomes. Renal function was recovered in 7 patients (28.0%) in group R, and 9 (36.0%) eventually underwent kidney transplantation. CONCLUSION The survival outcomes of children requiring posttransplant RRT were significantly worse than those of children, who did not undergo RRT. Physicians should pay meticulous attention to patients requiring post-LT RRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Min Yoo
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yo Han Ahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Gyung Kang
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sola Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sanggyun Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Long-Term Survival Outcomes beyond the First Year after Liver Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Compared with Biliary Atresia: A Large-Volume Living Donor Liver Transplantation Single-Center Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247480. [PMID: 36556096 PMCID: PMC9780885 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is a common cause of liver transplantation (LT) but showed poor post-LT outcomes. We reviewed 36 PALF patients and 120 BA patients who underwent LT in our institution. The cause of PALF was unknown in 66.7%. PALF patients were older (6.2 vs. 2.9 years) with higher PELD scores (31.5 vs. 24.4) and shorter waitlist time (15.7 vs. 256.1 days) (p < 0.01). PALF patients showed higher rates of post-transplant renal replacement therapy (RRT) (13.9% vs. 4.2%) and hepatic artery complications (13.9% vs. 0.8%), while portal vein complications rates were lower (0% vs. 10.8%), (p < 0.05). Although PALF patients showed lower 5-year survival rates (77.8% vs. 95.0 %, p < 0.01), the 5-year survival rates of patients who lived beyond the first year were comparable (96.6% vs. 98.3%, p = 0.516). The most common cause of deaths within one year was graft failure (75.0%) in PALF patients, but infection (67.7%) in BA patients. In multivariate analysis, lower body weight, hepatic artery complications and post-transplant RRT were associated with worse survival outcomes (p < 0.05). In conclusion, physicians should be alert to monitor the immediate postoperative graft dysfunction and hepatic artery complications and patients on post-transplant RRT in order to improve survival outcomes in PALF patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Quelhas P, Cerski C, Dos Santos JL. Update on Etiology and Pathogenesis of Biliary Atresia. Curr Pediatr Rev 2022; 19:48-67. [PMID: 35538816 DOI: 10.2174/1573396318666220510130259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Biliary atresia is a rare inflammatory sclerosing obstructive cholangiopathy that initiates in infancy as complete choledochal blockage and progresses to the involvement of intrahepatic biliary epithelium. Growing evidence shows that biliary atresia is not a single entity with a single etiology but a phenotype resulting from multifactorial events whose common path is obliterative cholangiopathy. The etiology of biliary atresia has been explained as resulting from genetic variants, toxins, viral infection, chronic inflammation or bile duct lesions mediated by autoimmunity, abnormalities in the development of the bile ducts, and defects in embryogenesis, abnormal fetal or prenatal circulation and susceptibility factors. It is increasingly evident that the genetic and epigenetic predisposition combined with the environmental factors to which the mother is exposed are potential triggers for biliary atresia. There is also an indication that a progressive thickening of the arterial middle layer occurs in this disease, suggestive of vascular remodeling and disappearance of the interlobular bile ducts. It is suggested that the hypoxia/ischemia process can affect portal structures in biliary atresia and is associated with both the extent of biliary proliferation and the thickening of the medial layer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia Quelhas
- CICS-UBI - Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Carlos Cerski
- Department of Pathology, University Federal Rio Grande do Sul, 90040-060, Porto Alegre, Brasil
| | - Jorge Luiz Dos Santos
- CICS-UBI - Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hong SK, Yi NJ, Hong K, Han ES, Lee JM, Choi Y, Lee KW, Suh KS. Risk Factors Affecting Outcomes in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Real-World Single-Center Experience. Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e929145. [PMID: 34045429 PMCID: PMC8168285 DOI: 10.12659/aot.929145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite liver transplantation (LT) being the standard treatment for pediatric end-stage liver disease, complications often persist and can adversely affect the post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to identify the risk factors affecting the outcomes in pediatric LT patients. Material/Methods Data from pediatric patients who underwent primary LT from March 1988 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Chronic liver disease was defined as an explanted liver showing fibrosis regardless of grade, cirrhosis, or any other underlying disease that may cause progressive liver injury leading to fibrosis or cirrhosis. Results A total of 255 pediatric patients underwent LT during the study period. Their 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 90.5%, 88.4%, and 87.8%, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, while liver disease without underlying chronic liver disease (P=0.024) and a pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score ≥30 (P=0.036) were the only factors associated with worse survival, body weight <6 kg (P=0.050), whole-liver DDLT compared to LDLT (P=0.001), fulminant liver failure (P=0.008), and postoperative hepatic artery complications (P<0.001) were associated with worse graft survival. Liver disease without underlying chronic liver disease was the only factor independently associated with hepatic artery complications (P=0.003). Conclusions Greater caution is recommended in pediatric patients with liver disease unaccompanied by underlying chronic liver disease, high PELD score, or low body weight to improve survival after LT. Hepatic artery complication was the only surgical complication affecting the graft survival outcome, especially in patients having liver disease without underlying chronic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwangpyo Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Calinescu AM, Wildhaber BE. Early Vascular Complications. PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2021:181-191. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-63671-1.00020-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
9
|
Hong SK, Yi NJ, Yoon KC, Kim MS, Lee JG, Lee S, Kang KJ, Hwang S, Ryu JH, Hong K, Han ES, Lee JM, Lee KW, Suh KS. Outcomes of Pediatric Liver Transplantation in Korea Using Two National Registries. J Clin Med 2020; 9:3435. [PMID: 33114650 PMCID: PMC7694033 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective study aimed to evaluate overall survival and the risk factors for mortality among Korean pediatric liver transplantation (LT) patients using data from two national registries: the Korean Network Organ Sharing (KONOS) of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY). METHODS Prospectively collected data of 755 pediatric patients who underwent primary LT (KONOS, February 2000 to December 2015; KOTRY, May 2014 to December 2017) were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 90.6%, 86.7%, 85.8%, and 85.5%, respectively, in KONOS, and the 1-month, 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 92.1%, 89.4%, 89.4%, and 87.2%, respectively, in KOTRY. There was no significant difference in survival between the two registries. Multivariate analysis identified that body weight ≥6 kg (p <0.001), biliary atresia as underlying liver disease (p = 0.001), and high-volume center (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival according to the KONOS database, while hepatic artery complication (p < 0.001) was associated with poorer overall survival rates according to the KOTRY database. CONCLUSION Long-term pediatric patient survival after LT was satisfactory in this Korean national registry analysis. However, children with risk factors for poor outcomes should be carefully managed after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Kyung Chul Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.S.K.); (J.G.L.)
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (M.S.K.); (J.G.L.)
| | - Sanghoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 13557, Korea;
| | - Koo Jeong Kang
- Department of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea;
| | - Shin Hwang
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea;
| | - Je Ho Ryu
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 46241, Korea;
| | - Kwangpyo Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea; (S.K.H.); (K.C.Y.); (K.H.); (E.S.H.); (J.-M.L.); (K.-W.L.); (K.-S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Su G, Wang H, Bai J, Chen G, Pei Y. A Metabonomics Approach to Drug Toxicology in Liver Disease and its Application in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Curr Drug Metab 2019; 20:292-300. [PMID: 30599107 DOI: 10.2174/1389200220666181231124439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The progression of liver disease causes metabolic transformation in vivo and thus affects corresponding endogenous small molecular compounds. Metabonomics is a powerful technology which is able to assess global low-molecular-weight endogenous metabolites in a biological system. This review is intended to provide an overview of a metabonomics approach to the drug toxicology of diseases of the liver. METHODS The regulation of, and relationship between, endogenous metabolites and diseases of the liver is discussed in detail. Furthermore, the metabolic pathways involved in drug interventions of liver diseases are reviewed. Evaluation of the protective mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine in liver diseases using metabonomics is also reviewed. Examples of applications of metabolite profiling concerning biomarker discovery are highlighted. In addition, new developments and future prospects are described. RESULTS Metabonomics can measure changes in metabolism relating to different stages of liver disease, so metabolic differences can provide a basis for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of various diseases. CONCLUSION Metabonomics has great advantages in all aspects of the therapy of liver diseases, with good prospects for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangyue Su
- School of Functional Food and Wine, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Haifeng Wang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Jiao Bai
- Department of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Yuehu Pei
- Department of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| |
Collapse
|