Robotic conversion of cecostomy tube to catheterizable antegrade continence enema (ACE): Surgical technique

Advancing Pediatric Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Trends, Outcomes, and Future Directions-A Comprehensive Review

INTRODUCTION

 Pediatric robotic colorectal surgery has rapidly evolved, offering enhanced precision and safety for treating complex conditions such as Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), anorectal malformations (ARMs), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review analyzes recent trends, outcomes, and complications in robotic colorectal procedures for pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A systematic review was performed using PubMed, yielding 1,112 articles related to pediatric robotic colorectal surgery. After applying exclusion criteria, 35 papers were analyzed, focusing on patient characteristics, procedure types, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

 Since 2001, approximately 700 pediatric patients have undergone robotic colorectal procedures, with HSCR being the most commonly treated condition (n = 421). The review highlights that 1.7% of patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, while 11.5% had grade I to II complications, indicating a favorable safety profile. The use of robotic platforms facilitated improved precision during perirectal dissection and reduced the risk of damage to adjacent structures, particularly in cases requiring complex pelvic dissections. Despite promising outcomes, the uptake of robotic colorectal surgery remains lower than that for urologic procedures due to challenges such as cost, instrument size, and specialized training.

CONCLUSION

 Robotic colorectal surgery in children is a safe and effective approach, particularly for complex conditions like HSCR, IBDs, and ARMs. While adoption is currently limited by cost and training requirements, ongoing advancements in technology and techniques promise to broaden its application and improve outcomes in pediatric surgery.

Robotic surgery for paediatric neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in a systematic review the outcomes, benefits, and limitations of robot-assisted surgeries for paediatric neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), as robot-assisted techniques have emerged as a potential alternative, offering enhanced precision, dexterity, and visualisation.

METHODS

This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier CRD42023464849) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included studies of paediatric patients (aged <18 years) with neurogenic LUTD undergoing robot-assisted continence surgery, assessing safety and efficacy. Literature searches in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Scopus were conducted until 12 July 2024. Data extraction included surgical procedures, complications, operative times, lengths of stay, and bladder function outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies (20 case reports, 10 case series, six cohort studies, six comparative cohort studies) were included. Robotic procedures for continent catherisable channel construction, augmentation cystoplasty, and bladder neck reconstruction showed comparable peri- and postoperative outcomes. Meta-analysis of five studies comparing robotic vs open appendicovesicostomy indicated a significant reduction in length of stay for robotic groups, while operative time, complications, and re-intervention rates were not significantly different. Conversions to open surgery were rare, indicated by adhesions or small appendices during channel constructions.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted surgeries for paediatric neurogenic LUTD demonstrate potential benefits, including reduced hospital stays and comparable complication rates to open surgery in certain contexts. However, the available evidence is limited by heterogeneity in study designs, small sample sizes, and single-centre experiences, which constrain generalisability. Standardised reporting of complications and outcomes, alongside multicentre studies, is essential to clarify the long-term efficacy and broader applicability of these techniques.

Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

No gold standard exists for managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction, specifically in individuals with spina bifida. Since the International Children's Continence Society published its consensus document on neurogenic bowel treatment in 2012, an increased focus on why we must manage bowels and how to improve our management has occurred. This review provides updated information for clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

A surge in research, mostly retrospective, has been conducted on the success and satisfaction of three types of management for neurogenic bowel. All three management techniques have relatively high success rates for fecal continence and satisfaction rates. Selection of which treatment to carry out still is debated among clinicians. Transanal irrigation is a safe and effective management option for neurogenic bowel that does not require surgery. Antegrade enemas can be carried out via cecostomy tube or Malone antegrade continence enema with similar fecal continence outcomes.