Gastric antral vascular ectasia in portal hypertensive children: Endoscopic band ligation versus argon plasma coagulation

Endoscopic band ligation versus argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the established endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). Recently, the use of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has gained recognition as an alternate approach. The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of APC versus EBL in the treatment of GAVE.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for articles on APC versus EBL for GAVE treatment. Preferred outcomes were subjected to systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 10 studies involving 476 subjects (47.47% men and mean age of 56.25 years). The number of sessions required for the obliteration of lesions was higher with APC. The pooled eradication rate of GAVE with EBL was 88.6% (95% CI, 79.9-81.5; I2 = 13.5%) and with APC was 57.9% (95% CI, 43.7-71; I2 = 59%; relative risk [RR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-2.02; I2 = 72%; P < .001). EBL had a lower bleeding recurrence (6.6%; 95% CI, 3.4-12.5; I2 = 0%) compared with APC (39.7%, 95% CI, 26.9-54.15; I2 = 55%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.44; I2 = 0%; P < .001). GAVE recurrence with EBL was 7.3% (95% CI, 3.8-13.6; I2 = 0%) and with APC was 38.5% (95% CI, 24.4-54.9; I2 = 64%; RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.109-0.446; I2 = 0%; P < .01). Transfusion requirements and hospitalizations were lower with EBL compared with APC. Adverse events associated with EBL were 16.8% (95% CI, 6.6-36.7; I2 = 83%) compared with APC at 9.3% (95% CI, 5.6-15.1; I2 = 19%; RR, 2.11; 95% CI, 0.8-5.46; I2 = 58%; P = .1).

CONCLUSIONS

EBL demonstrated better eradication with fewer treatment sessions, recurrent bleeding, hospitalizations, and transfusion requirements as compared with APC. It is time that EBL be used as the first-line endoscopic treatment for GAVE.

A delayed gastric antral vascular ectasia: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. It presents challenges in both diagnosis and treatment.

PATIENT CONCERN

We reported a female patient who was initially misdiagnosed with hemorrhage of the digestive tract. She was treated with medication for 4 months, but her hemoglobin levels still declined without blood transfusion.

DIAGNOSIS

Her diagnosis was GAVE after an endoscopic examination.

INTERVENTIONS

She was treated with an endoscopic argon plasma coagulation treatment, an endoscopic band ligation treatment, medication, and traditional Chinese medicine.

OUTCOMES

This case was followed up for 6 months and her hemoglobin levels were above 9 g/dL.

LESSONS

A combination treatment of endoscopic and medication treatment will be a good choice of GAVE. More comprehensive understanding of GAVE will be build up with the developments of new technologies and methods.

Comparing Endoscopic Treatment Modalities for Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes in a Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is characterized by vascular ectasias accounting for 4% of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeds, which can range from occult bleeds to severe acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In turn, GAVE can lead to severe morbidity and recurrent hospitalization. Current endoscopic treatments for GAVE include argon plasma coagulation (APC), endoscopic band ligation (EBL), and radiofrequency ablation. With this significant burden in mind, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of various modalities in the treatment of GAVE.

METHODS

All studies that involved adults and children with endoscopic characteristics of GAVE undergoing treatment with APC, EBL, radiofrequency ablation, or a combination of 2 treatment modalities were included.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the rate of adverse events and the number of red blood cell transfusions across all 3 groups (APC, EBL, and APC + EBL). However, statistical differences were noted for outcomes of bleeding recurrence, length of hospitalization, and change in hemoglobin status. EBL exhibited a significant decrease in bleeding recurrence when compared with APC. Moreover, shorter hospitalization stays were seen in APC + EBL and EBL groups compared with APC, and a beneficial change in hemoglobin status was also more often seen in APC + EBL and EBL groups compared with APC.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, EBL was found to have superior efficacy when compared with APC for the treatment of GAVE; however, there was no significant difference in rates of adverse events between APC, EBL, and combination therapy.

To coagulate, ligate, or both: a randomized study comparing the safety and efficacy of two endoscopic approaches for managing gastric antral vascular ectasia in cirrhotic patients

Background

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is an uncommon but important cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the standard therapy for GAVE. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is an emerging, safe and effective treatment for GAVE. The best way of applying EBL in the management of GAVE is not clear yet.

Aim

We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of APC alternating with EBL versus EBL alone for managing GAVE in cirrhotic patients.

Patients and methods

Forty cirrhotic patients with bleeding GAVE were randomized to receive either APC alternating with EBL (20 patients) or EBL alone (20 patients) until GAVE lesions are eradicated. Gastroscopy was done 6 months after eradication of GAVE lesions to document recurrence. Cessation of bleeding, rise of hemoglobin level, need for transfusion, hospitalization, complications, number of sessions, and recurrence of GAVE in both groups were statistically analyzed.

Results

Patients in both groups showed significantly high rate of bleeding cessation, improvement in hemoglobin levels, reduction in transfusions, and hospitalizations. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the recurrence of GAVE between the two groups. There were no complications seen in the combined therapy group. Twenty percent of the patients in the EBL group had complications including hypertrophied polyp formation and post-band ulcerations.

Conclusion

APC alternating with EBL and EBL alone are effective methods in the treatment of bleeding GAVE. Combined therapy has the potential to decrease the number of banding sessions and the number of rubber bands required to treat GAVE, consequently decreasing the incidence of band-related complications.

Endoscopic Band Ligation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation in the Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the most commonly used endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has emerged as an alternative therapy. Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of APC and EBL for the treatment of GAVE. This is the first systematic review that included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed using electronic databases to identify RCTs comparing APC and EBL for the treatment of GAVE following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Four RCTs were included, with a total of 204 patients. EBL was related to higher endoscopic eradication rates risk difference [RD], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.14, 0.44]; I2=0%) and less bleeding recurrence than APC (RD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.15, 0.44]; I2=0%). Patients treated with EBL required fewer blood transfusions (mean difference [MD], 1.49; 95% CI [0.28, 2.71]; I2=96%) and hospitalizations (MD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.19, 0.39]; I2=0%). The number of sessions required for the obliteration of lesions was higher with APC. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

EBL is superior to APC in the treatment of GAVE in terms of endoscopic eradication rates, recurrence of bleeding, and transfusion requirements.

Endoscopic band ligation compared to thermal therapy for gastric antral vascular ectasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Gastric antral vascular ectasia is an infrequent cause of gastrointestinal‐related blood loss manifesting as iron‐deficiency anemia or overt gastrointestinal bleeding, and is associated with increased healthcare burdens. Endoscopic therapy of gastric antral vascular ectasia most commonly involves endoscopic thermal therapy. Endoscopic band ligation has been studied as an alternative therapy with promising results in gastric antral vascular ectasia.

Aims

The primary aim was to compare the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic thermal therapy by argon plasma coagulation for the management of bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia in terms of the mean post‐procedural transfusion requirements and the mean hemoglobin level change. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the number of sessions needed for cessation of bleeding, the change in transfusion requirements, and the adverse events rate.

Methods

PubMed, Medline, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were reviewed. Randomized controlled clinical trials and retrospective studies comparing endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic thermal therapy in bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia, with a follow‐up period of at least 6 months, were included. Statistical analysis was done using Review Manager.

Results

Our search yielded 516 papers. After removing duplicates and studies not fitting the criteria of selection, five studies including 207 patients were selected for analysis. Over a follow‐up period of at least 6 months, patients treated with endoscopic band ligation had significantly lower post‐procedural transfusion requirements (MD −2.10; 95% confidence interval (−2.42 to −1.77)) and a significantly higher change in the mean hemoglobin with endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic thermal therapy (MD 0.92; 95% confidence interval [0.39–1.45]). Endoscopic band ligation led to a fewer number of required sessions (MD −1.15; 95% confidence interval [−2.30 to −0.01]) and a more pronounced change in transfusion requirements (MD −3.26; 95% confidence interval [−4.84 to −1.68]). There was no difference in adverse events.

Conclusion

Results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited literature concerning the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia. Compared to endoscopic thermal therapy, endoscopic band ligation for the management of bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia led to significantly lower transfusion requirements, showed a trend toward more remarkable post‐procedural hemoglobin elevation, and a fewer number of procedures. Endoscopic band ligation may improve outcomes and lead to decreased healthcare burden and costs.

Endoscopic treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia in real-life settings: Argon plasma coagulation or endoscopic band ligation?

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) on gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) may be impaired over time and depends greatly on the application settings. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) may be an alternative, but study on its efficacy is limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of APC and EBL in treating GAVE.

METHODS

Changes in the need for blood transfusion, number of treatment sessions and hospitalizations were retrospectively assessed in 63 transfusion-dependent patients with GAVE (mean age: 67.1 y, 54.0% female) treated with either APC or EBL (45 and 18 patients, respectively) in four tertiary endoscopic centers.

RESULTS

Both methods substantially increased hemoglobin levels and decreased patients' need for a transfusion (22.0 ± 4.0 g/L and -5.62 ± 2.30 units of packed red blood cells [RBC] with APC, and 27.4 ± 6.1 g/L and -4.79 ± 2.46 units of packed RBC with EBL), without a significant statistical difference between the methods. However, fewer EBL sessions were required both for the cessation of need for a transfusion compared with those for the resolution of GAVE lesions (0.90 ± 0.10 vs 1.69 ± 0.31, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Both APC and EBL are effective in GAVE treatment. EBL may be superior in terms of number of treatment sessions, but not in its influence on hemoglobin level and need for transfusion. Further prospective studies with large, homogeneous sample size and standardized APC settings are needed.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension

These guidelines on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) in the management of portal hypertension have been commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee (CSSC) of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the Liver Section of the BSG. The guidelines are new and have been produced in collaboration with the British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) and British Association of the Study of the Liver (BASL). The guidelines development group comprises elected members of the BSG Liver Section, representation from BASL, a nursing representative and two patient representatives. The quality of evidence and grading of recommendations was appraised using the GRADE system. These guidelines are aimed at healthcare professionals considering referring a patient for a TIPSS. They comprise the following subheadings: indications; patient selection; procedural details; complications; and research agenda. They are not designed to address: the management of the underlying liver disease; the role of TIPSS in children; or complex technical and procedural aspects of TIPSS.